Comparing independent prescribing to patient group direction use in a general practitioner out-of-hours service: a retrospective cross-sectional service evaluation.

Introduction: Global demand for healthcare is escalating, prompting exploration of innovative strategies to augment service capacity. Independent prescribing (IP) helps to address this challenge, allowing non-medical professionals to prescribe medication. Paramedics in the UK were granted prescribing privileges in 2018, yet uptake remains low. Despite qualitative evidence indicating that paramedic prescribing is beneficial, quantitative comparisons of medication provision between prescribers and non-prescribers are lacking. Paramedics provide patients with non-emergency medication by three different routes: IP, using a patient group direction (PGD) or with prescriber support.Advanced paramedic practitioners who are not qualified as independent prescribers, rotating through ambulance and general practitioner out-of-hours services, offered an opportunity to quantitatively compare medication supply. Methods: This study compares medication supply by three advanced paramedic practitioners using PGDs with three prescribing nurses in a Welsh general practitioner out-of-hours service. A cross-sectional design was employed to retrospectively review electronic patient clinical records between 1 December 2019 and 30 November 2020, including patients presenting with one of five generalised clinical conditions (urinary, soft tissue, respiratory, abdominal pain, ear). Descriptive analysis and non-parametric tests compared medications prescribed or supplied, how patients received medication and reasons for seeking prescriber support. Results: A total of 397 patient records were analysed. Paramedics supplied medications more frequently with prescriber support (68.2%) than via PGD (27.9%). Nurses predominantly prescribed medication independently (99.3%). Medication provision was comparable when paramedics had prescriber support. Reasons for paramedic support-seeking included having no PGD available (34.1%) and PGD being excluded from use (28.4%). Conclusions: Advanced paramedic practitioner medication supply using PGDs and prescriber support was comparable to that of prescribing nurse colleagues. However, autonomy restrictions highlight the need for paramedic prescribing in services where prescriber availability is limited. Further research evaluating the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of PGD use versus IP is necessary. Additionally, the qualitative benefits of IP, such as improved patient care and satisfaction, warrant due consideration when implementing future healthcare strategies.

What is nursing in advanced nursing practice? Applying theories and models to advanced nursing practice-A discursive review.

AIM: This article appraises models and theories related to advanced nursing practice. It argues that while the role of the advanced nurse practitioner builds on and extends beyond traditional nursing, it remains firmly grounded in 'caring'. BACKGROUND: The stereotype that nurses 'care' and doctors 'cure' is fading. Increasingly, nurses have crossed boundaries and conducted independent assessment, diagnosis, prescribing and consultation, which used to be the doctor's role. Confusion and argument have arisen due to the higher-level practice of the advanced nurse practitioner, as many questions where these 'doctor nurses' stand. DESIGN: A literature review. DATA SOURCES: Databases, including CINAHL, Medline and Google Scholar, were searched. METHOD: Databases were searched, and relevant studies and review articles from 1970 to 2023 were identified using the following keywords: 'advanced nurse practitioner', 'nurse practitioner', 'advanced nursing', 'advance practice', 'nurse practitioner', 'nursing theory' and 'nursing model'. RESULTS: Although advanced nurse practitioners identify themselves as nurses, there is limited use of nursing theory to conceptualize this new level of practice and to define their contribution to the multi-disciplinary team. It is noted that a holistic approach to personalized patient care, based on therapeutic relationships and effective communication, may help us identify the unique contribution of the advanced nurse practitioner. CONCLUSIONS: The development of advanced nursing theory needs to capture this holistic approach and its caring element to recognize the value and strengthen the identity allegiance of this hybrid role. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Holistic approach and patient-centred care, effective communication and the therapeutic relationship are strong characteristics relating to ANP practice, the latter of which is yet to be clearly defined and captured in nursing theories. Conceptualizing ANP practice and capturing their valuable nursing care will enable better understanding and clarity for the role to realize its full potential.

Exploring the role of advanced clinical practitioners (ACPs) and their contribution to health services in England: A qualitative exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: An extended role being explored globally is the advanced clinical practitioner (ACP). In England this is an extended role for allied health professions, nurses and midwives in a range of settings. OBJECTIVES: This paper focuses on three research questions: 1) What is the role of ACPs in England? 2) What are the barriers and facilitators to implementing the role? and 3) What is the contribution of ACPs to health services in England? DESIGN/SETTING: A qualitative, exploratory study to explore perspectives on the ACP role in a range of clinical settings. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 63 stakeholders, including 34 nurses, working in a ACP role or ACP education. A purposive snowball sampling technique identified participants meeting inclusion criteria. METHODS: One-to-one semi-structured interviews throughout 2020, recorded and transcribed verbatim, anonymised and thematically analysed. RESULTS: The ACP role in England was undertaken in a broad range of clinical contexts. In England 'advanced clinical practitioner' was not a protected title. There were high levels of variability and ambiguity of understanding and deployment of the ACP role in England. Facilitators to the implementation process included training and education, clinical supervision and organisational support. Lack of protection for the role and variances in experience were barriers. Employer support facilitated development of the ACP role, however where support was limited, at either an individual or organisation level, this was a barrier. Our study highlighted the wide range of ways the ACP role benefitted patient outcomes and workforce development. CONCLUSIONS: This study outlines the contribution that ACPs can make to health services, contributing factors and key barriers and facilitators to implementing this role. The work showed the positive contribution ACPs can make to service redesign, workforce development and patient outcomes, whilst accepting there is much work to do to ensure protected status and parity across all professions and clinical contexts.

Determining the top research priorities in UK prehospital critical care: a modified Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital critical care is a rapidly evolving field. There is a paucity of evidence relating to its practice, with limited progress in answering those research questions identified over a decade ago. It is vital that evidence gaps are identified and addressed. This study aimed to define the current research priorities in UK prehospital critical care. METHODS: This modified national Delphi study was coordinated by the Pre-HOspital Trainee Operated research Network and conducted in four rounds between October 2021 and April 2022. Rounds 1 and 2 were conducted online with clinicians involved in prehospital critical care delivery and non-clinical prehospital researchers. Rounds 3 and 4 were completed online by a subject matter expert (SME) panel. RESULTS: In round 1, 78 participants submitted 394 research questions relating to prehospital critical care delivery in the UK. These were refined and categorised into 192 questions, which were scored for importance in round 2. Fifty questions were discussed and scored by the SME panel in round 3. Round 4 created a ranked top 20 list. The top research priority was 'Which cardiac arrest patients should critical care teams be dispatched to; how do we identify these patients during the emergency call?'. Other priorities included dispatch optimisation, out-of-hospital medical cardiac arrest management, optimising resuscitation in haemorrhagic shock, improving traumatic brain injury outcomes and optimising management of traumatic cardiac arrest. CONCLUSIONS: This modified Delphi study identified 20 research priorities where efforts should be concentrated to develop collaborative prehospital critical care research within the UK over the next 5 years.

An analysis of the utility, effectiveness and scope of advanced physiotherapy practitioners in an urgent treatment centre pilot.

BACKGROUND: The NHS Five Year Forward View explored the requirement to redesign emergency departments in England. It suggested that by December 2019, all emergency departments should aim to develop urgent treatment centres primarily led by primary care services opposed to the traditional model of being emergency physician led. This redesign aims to improve patient care by "helping people who need urgent care to get the right advice in the right place, first time". AIM: One aim was to quantify the proportional presentations of patients attending the emergency department who were suitable for management by advanced physiotherapy practitioners (APPs). A second aim was to analyse patient care delivered by APPs in comparison to other members of the multidisciplinary team. METHODS: A retrospective service evaluation was undertaken reviewing a pilot urgent treatment centre at a busy major trauma centre. Data was collected to assess number of patients seen by all multidisciplinary cohort members. This was to assess presentation patterns and compare workload delivery. RESULTS: The pilot found that APPs could assess and treat a wide range of conditions within the urgent treatment centre. APPs saw 30% of the caseload, organised similar numbers of investigations than GPs and had fewer 30 days re-attendances. CONCLUSION: The service review highlighted APP can assess, treat, discharge and appropriately refer similar numbers of patients compared to multidisciplinary colleagues. This would suggest that APPs are likely to be highly cost effective within an urgent treatment centre environment, but further study is warranted to assess clinical and cost effectiveness.

A physiotherapy triage service for orthopaedic upper limb service: an effective way to reduce clinic visits and identify patients for operative intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Waiting times for orthopaedic outpatient clinics are steadily increasing over the past number of years worldwide. Physiotherapy triage clinics are being utilised to improve access for patients with non-urgent or routine musculoskeletal disorders, to be seen in a timely manner in specialised out-patient clinics. Using these clinics, the aim is to ultimately stratify patients into appropriate management pathways. The aim of our study is to review the effectiveness of a physiotherapy triage clinic run by advanced practitioner physiotherapists (APP), who specialise in the review of upper limb referrals from primary care physicians. METHODS: For this study, a prospective, observational design was used. Patients were referred to the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Upper Limb Service at a national elective Orthopaedic Unit. The patients' referrals were reviewed and allocated to a physiotherapy triage pathway if deemed routine, non-urgent cases. After assessment in the APP clinic, the physiotherapist made recommendations and highlighted patients who required review or case discussion with an orthopaedic surgeon. The discharge rate and outcome of patients referred on for further interventions or operative procedures was followed over a 3-year period. The outcomes for the patients were reviewed, including whether patients who met an orthopaedic surgeon went on to have surgical intervention. RESULTS: During the study, 646 patients were reviewed in an upper limb APP physiotherapy triage clinic. Of those reviewed, only 201 patients required review by an orthopaedic surgeon. Of those, 56 patients were scheduled for an operative procedure. Within the 3-year period, 50 patients of those scheduled underwent the procedure. The most commonly performed procedure being an arthroscopic subacromial decompression with or without acromioplasty or rotator cuff repair. A total of 145 patients referred by the physiotherapist had a shoulder injection including subacromial and glenohumeral intra-articular injection. The initial discharge rate was 68%. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high initial discharge rate after initial assessment by APP triage clinics for upper limb musculoskeletal pathology. This is beneficial in alleviating waiting list pressures allowing only those patients in need of intervention to be placed on the ever expanding waiting lists to see orthopaedic surgeons. This study shows a high proportion of patients being offered surgical intervention after being referred by the APP. We conclude from this that the agreement between the physiotherapist's initial diagnosis and that of the consultant surgeon being similar in identifying patients who would benefit from operative intervention.

The changing context of advanced practice nursing within the UK community care setting.

Advanced practice nursing (APN) roles have developed partly to address demand and workforce issues. In community care settings and general practice, an advanced nursing practitioner is generally understood to mean a nurse who has undertaken additional education and training in clinical assessment, including history-taking and physical examination, clinical reasoning and independent prescribing, so they can safely manage patients presenting with undifferentiated and undiagnosed conditions. Capabilities in the Skills for Health framework cover everything from communication and consultation skills, practising holistically and personalised care, to working with colleagues and in teams. The framework is intended to ensure advanced nursing practitioners work to an advanced level. It is also designed to support them to demonstrate and evidence their capabilities to service commissioners, employers, people accessing healthcare and the public.

Introducing advanced level practice and the scope of developing new roles.

Barry Hill and Aby Mitchell introduce a new series on advanced level practice. They describe the frameworks that outline advanced practitioner roles and explain how the roles affect patients, services and organisations.

Factors influencing the implementation of Epilepsy Specialist Nurse role: Using the Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research.

BACKGROUND: Research to support the added value of including Epilepsy Specialist Nurses as members of the multidisciplinary team is developing, yet little information exists on factors influencing the translation of these roles into practice. AIM: To describe the enabling and inhibiting factors to the implementation of the Epilepsy Specialist Nurse role in the Republic of Ireland. METHODS: A qualitative design involving semi-structure interviews, observation and analysis of documents, such as portfolios was used. The sample included 12 Epilepsy Specialist Nurses, 24 multidisciplinary team members, and 35 individuals with epilepsy and family members. Data were analysed using the Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research. Reporting rigour is demonstrated using the COREQ checklist (See Appendix S1). RESULTS: While there was overwhelming support for the role, barriers and enablers were identified across all domains of the Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research. Enablers included national policies and guidelines, leadership from senior nursing and medical colleagues, climate of learning and mentorship, networking opportunities, infrastructural supports and competence of Epilepsy Specialist Nurses. Barriers included the limited consideration of service expansion and the increasingly complex nature of clinical cases on workload capacity. Deficits in infrastructural supports, challenges in relation to role preparation, role implementation and role responsibility, including concerns around lone practitioner models and concerns that the role was a cost-saving measure, also emerged as potential barriers to future sustainability. CONCLUSION: The Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research offers researchers a pragmatic typology for analysing interrelationships between enabling and inhibiting factors that impact implementation of advanced practice roles, across different evidence sources, disciplines and boundaries. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: In order to secure role sustainability, managers need to address the rate of service expansion, models of role development, deficits in supports and perceived motivations for role development on the quality, acceptability and sustainability of services provided.

An investigation into the perceived value of the College of Radiographers voluntary accreditation scheme for advanced and consultant practitioners in breast imaging.

INTRODUCTION: A voluntary accreditation scheme has been introduced, requiring advanced (AdP) and consultant practitioners (CP) to submit several pieces of work to the College of Radiographers (CoR). However, few individuals have opted to become voluntary accredited. This study investigated the reasons behind becoming voluntary accredited, the value that was gained and why there appears to be a lack of support for the scheme. METHODS: An online electronic survey was conducted using a mixed methods approach. Open questions enabled individual opinions and thoughts to be expressed, Likert scale style questions allowed further understanding of the level of agreement and closed questions identified the support for and against the scheme. RESULTS: A total of 55 respondents participated, including 18 AdPs, 25 CPs, 1 consultant trainee practitioner, 5 practitioners and 6 listed as 'other'. Forty-four participants were non-accredited, citing too much clinical work; no recognition from employers and too much effort for little reward. Motivations for joining the scheme were to improve the profession; help create a new consultant post and protect the non-clinical element of the consultant role. CONCLUSION: The CoR voluntary accreditation scheme has a small perceived value but overall, the majority of respondents believed the scheme did not warrant the work needed to apply. Concern was raised about the risk of creating a two-tier profession by the scheme's instigation. The results of this study suggest that the CoR's voluntary accreditation scheme would need to address these barriers before more practitioners would apply.

Impact of emergency physician experience on decision-making in patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia and undergoing systematic thoracic CT scan.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the impact of a thoracic CT scan on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) diagnosis and patient management varies according to emergency physician's experience (≤10 vs >10 years). METHODS: Early thoracic CT Scan for Community-Acquired Pneumonia at the Emergency Department is an interventional study conducted from November 2011 to January 2013 in four French emergency departments, and included suspected patients with CAP. We analysed changes in emergency physician CAP diagnosis classification levels before and after CT scan; and their agreement with an adjudication committee. We performed univariate analysis to determine the factors associated with modifying the diagnosis classification level to be consistent with the radiologist's CT scan interpretation. RESULTS: 319 suspected patients with CAP and 136 emergency physicians (75% less experienced with ≤10 years, 25% with >10 years of experience) were included. The percentage of patients whose classification was modified to become consistent with CT scan radiologist's interpretation was higher among less-experienced than experienced emergency physicians (54.2% vs 40.2%; p=0.02). In univariate analysis, less emergency physician experience was the only factor associated with changing a classification to be consistent with the CT scan radiologist's interpretation (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.10, p=0.04). After CT scan, the agreement between emergency physicians and adjudication committee was moderate for less-experienced emergency physicians and slight for experienced emergency physicians (k=0.457 and k=0.196, respectively). After CT scan, less-experienced emergency physicians modified patient management significantly more than experienced emergency physicians (36.1% vs 21.7%, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, less-experienced emergency physicians were more likely to accurately modify their CAP diagnosis and patient management based on thoracic CT scan than more experienced emergency physicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01574066.

Impact of Emergency Medicine Consultants and Clinical Advisors on a NHS 111 Clinical Assessment Service.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome of clinical advice given by emergency physicians (EPs) versus non-physician clinical advisors (NPCAs) on a UK National Health Service 111 centre. METHOD: This was a prospective study conducted between July 2016 and February 2017. We targeted calls in which call handlers using standard NHS 111 clinical decision support software would have advised the caller to attend a hospital ED. These calls were passed to a clinical assessment service (CAS) and reviewed by either an EP (July to November 2016) or an NPCA (December 2016 to February 2017). RESULTS: During the preintervention year, 80.2% of callers were advised to attend the ED within 1 or 4 hours, 1.2% were referred to out of hours (OOH) primary care and 0.3% to self-care. During the study, call handlers designated 2606 calls as needing to attend the ED in 1 or 4 hours and passed these on to the clinical advisors. There was a reduction of 75%-81% in cases advised to attend the ED in both intervention groups; EPs advised 396 of 1558 callers (25.4%) to attend ED; NPCAs advised 194 of 1048 callers (18.5%) to attend ED. For calls not requiring the ED, EPs recommended self/home care management in 38.1% of these calls, NPCAs recommended self-care for 15.7% (difference=22.4%; 95% CI 19.0% to 25.7%). EPs recommended 4.5% to attend OOH primary care, while NPCAs recommended OOH primary care for 42.1% (difference=37.6%, 95% CI 34.3% to 40.8%). CONCLUSIONS: A CAS within NHS 111 using clinicians decreases referrals to the ED. EPs use fewer services and resources. Further work needs to be undertaken to determine the workforce skill mix for an NHS 111 CAS.

Evidence-based practice among epilepsy specialist nurses in the Republic of Ireland: Findings from the SENsE study.

AIM: To describe how epilepsy specialist nurses in Ireland enact the evidence-based practice dimension of their role. BACKGROUND: The importance of epilepsy specialist nurses (ESNs) delivering evidence-based care to people experiencing epilepsy is unquestionable, yet research into this aspect of the role is relatively sparse. METHODS: A qualitative design was used, involving 12 epilepsy specialist nurses working in five units in Ireland, 24 multidisciplinary team members working with them and 35 people with epilepsy and their family members. Data were collected using individual and focus group interviews, observation and documentary analysis. RESULTS: These ESNs were active in accumulating, translating, applying, generating and disseminating evidence. All were actively involved in, or leading audit and service evaluations, and used findings to improve practice. Their research activity mainly consisted of small-scale unfunded research projects. CONCLUSIONS: These ESNs acted as opinion leaders and role models in relation to evidence-based practice, including the generation of new knowledge through audit and research. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Organisations and managers need to support ESNs by ensuring that they have the necessary resources and competencies to accumulate, translate, apply, generate and disseminate relevant evidence. Future research should explore the impact of ESNs' evidence-based practice on patient outcomes.

Rising to the challenge: Epilepsy specialist nurses as leaders of service improvements and change (SENsE study).

PURPOSE: To report the leadership role and change activities of epilepsy specialist nurses (ESNs) in Ireland; findings from the SENsE study. METHOD: A mixed methods study design was used, involving 12 epilepsy specialist nurses working in five units in Ireland, 24multidisciplinary team members working with them, and 35 people with epilepsy and their family members. Data were collected using individual and focus group interviews, observation and documentary analysis. RESULTS: Five key areas in which ESNs demonstrated leading on the change agenda were identified. These included: Initiating new clinical practice developments; Building capability within the multidisciplinary team; Developing education programmes and resources for people with epilepsy, family and the public; Exerting influence through membership of committees and lobbying; and Advancing the ESN role. CONCLUSION: Though the epilepsy specialist nurse role was first established in the UK in 1988, much of the literature that discusses or describes the ESN role is founded on anecdotal evidence, or focusses on their clinical expertise. Findings from this study provide empirical evidence that the ESNs were involved as key players in leading changes within the services, in the education of others, and the continuous advancement of epilepsy care.

Predrawn prehospital medications are microbiologically safe for up to 48 hours.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital medical teams are commonly required to administer a range of medications for urgent stabilisation and treatment. The safe preparation of medications during resuscitation requires attention, time and resources, and can be a source of medication error. In our two road and HEMS (Helicopter Emergency Medical Service) prehospital services, medication errors are mitigated by predrawing commonly used medications to set concentrations daily (Hunter Retrieval Service, HRS) or second-daily (CareFlight Sydney, CFS). However, there are no published data confirming that such practice is microbiologically safe. METHODS: A convenience sample of 299 predrawn medication syringes with syringe dwell times up to 48 hours were collected at the end of their operational deployment. Predrawn medication syringes collected for culture were ketamine, midazolam, fentanyl, thiopentone, rocuronium, suxamethonium, metaraminol and normal saline. The samples were incubated and cultured at a tertiary hospital pathology laboratory using best-practice methodology for non-tissue samples. The samples were collected from June 2017 to February 2018. RESULTS: The mean dwell times ranged from 30.7 hours (fentanyl at HRS) to 48.5 hours (rocuronium at CFS). None of the 299 cultured samples yielded significant micro-organisms. One sample of suxamethonium with a syringe dwell time of 34 hours grew Bacillus cereus but was likely a contaminant introduced during sample collection. CONCLUSION: Predrawing of the eight studied medications for urgent prehospital procedures appears to be a microbiologically safe practice with syringe dwell times up to 48 hours.

Follow-up after arthroplasty of the hip and knee : are we over-servicing or under-caring?

The number of arthroplasties of the hip and knee is predicted to increase rapidly during the next 20 years. Accompanying this is the dilemma of how to follow-up these patients appropriately. Current guidelines recommend long-term follow-up to identify patients with aseptic loosening, which can occur more than a decade postoperatively. The current guidelines and practices of orthopaedic surgeons vary widely. Existing models take up much clinical time and are expensive. Pilot studies using 'virtual' clinics and advanced-practice physiotherapists have shown promise in decreasing the time and costs for orthopaedic surgeons and patients. This review discusses current practices and future trends in the follow-up of patients who have an arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:6-10.

A traumatic tale of two cities: does EMS level of care and transportation model affect survival in patients with trauma at level 1 trauma centres in two neighbouring Canadian provinces?

BACKGROUND: Two distinct Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems exist in Atlantic Canada. Nova Scotia operates an Advanced Emergency Medical System (AEMS) and New Brunswick operates a Basic Emergency Medical System (BEMS). We sought to determine if survival rates differed between the two systems. METHODS: This study examined patients with trauma who were transported directly to a level 1 trauma centre in New Brunswick or Nova Scotia between 1 April 2011 and 31 March 2013. Data were extracted from the respective provincial trauma registries; the lowest common Injury Severity Score (ISS) collected by both registries was ISS≥13. Survival to hospital and survival to discharge or 30 days were the primary endpoints. A separate analysis was performed on severely injured patients. Hypothesis testing was conducted using Fisher's exact test and the Student's t-test. RESULTS: 101 cases met inclusion criteria in New Brunswick and were compared with 251 cases in Nova Scotia. Overall mortality was low with 93% of patients surviving to hospital and 80% of patients surviving to discharge or 30 days. There was no difference in survival to hospital between the AEMS (232/251, 92%) and BEMS (97/101, 96%; OR 1.98, 95% CI 0.66 to 5.99; p=0.34) groups. Furthermore, when comparing patients with more severe injuries (ISS>24) there was no significant difference in survival (71/80, 89% vs 31/33, 94%; OR 1.96, 95% CI 0.40 to 9.63; p=0.50). CONCLUSION: Overall survival to hospital was the same between advanced and basic Canadian EMS systems. As numbers included are low, individual case benefit cannot be excluded.

Exploring the development and identity of advanced practice nursing in the UK.

The development of advanced nurse practice in the UK has been slow compared to some parts of the world. This article explores the history of advanced level nursing, the drivers for advanced nurse practice in the context of contemporary nursing and clinical leadership, the identity of advanced practice nursing roles, and the importance of advanced nurse practice in the UK.