RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anti-TNF therapy represented a landmark in medical treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). There is lack of data on the efficacy and safety of these agents in Brazilian patients. The present study aimed to analyze rates of clinical and endoscopic remission comparatively, between adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX), in Brazilian patients with UC, and evaluate factors associated with clinical and endoscopic remission after 1 year of treatment. METHODS: A national retrospective multicenter study (24 centers) was performed including patients with UC treated with anti-TNF therapy. Outcomes as clinical response and remission, endoscopic remission and secondary loss of response were measured in different time points of the follow-up. Baseline predictive factors of clinical and endoscopic remission at week 52 were evaluated using logistic regression model. Indirect comparisons among groups (ADA and IFX) were performed using Student's t, Pearson χ2 or Fisher's exact test when appropriated, and Kaplan Meier analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 393 patients were included (ADA, n = 111; IFX, n = 282). The mean age was 41.86 ± 13.60 years, 61.58% were female, most patients had extensive colitis (62.40%) and 19.39% had previous exposure to a biological agent. Overall, clinical remission rate was 66.78%, 71.62% and 82.82% at weeks 8, 26 and 52, respectively. Remission rates were higher in the IFX group at weeks 26 (75.12% vs. 62.65%, p < 0.0001) and 52 (65.24% vs. 51.35%, p < 0.0001) when compared to ADA. According to Kaplan-Meier survival curve loss of response was less frequent in the Infliximab compared to Adalimumab group (p = 0.001). Overall, endoscopic remission was observed in 50% of patients at week 26 and in 65.98% at week 52, with no difference between the groups (p = 0.114). Colectomy was performed in 23 patients (5.99%). Age, non-prior exposure to biological therapy, use of IFX and endoscopic remission at week 26 were associated with clinical remission after 52 weeks. Variables associated with endoscopic remission were non-prior exposure to biological therapy, and clinical and endoscopic remission at week 26. CONCLUSIONS: IFX was associated with higher rates of clinical remission after 1 year in comparison to ADA. Non-prior exposure to biological therapy and early response to anti-TNF treatment were associated with higher rates of clinical and endoscopic remission.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Brasil , Colite Ulcerativa/induzido quimicamente , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Infliximab/efeitos adversos , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Despite significant development in the pharmacological treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) along with the evolution of therapeutic targets and treatment strategies, a significant subset of patients still requires surgery during the course of the disease. As IBD patients are frequently exposed to biologics at the time of abdominal and perianal surgery, it is crucial to identify any potential impact of biological agents in the perioperative period. Even though detectable serum concentrations of biologics do not seem to increase postoperative complications after abdominal procedures in IBD, there is increasing evidence on the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in the perioperative setting. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of published studies reporting the association of drug concentrations and postoperative outcomes, postoperative recurrence (POR) after an ileocolonic resection for Crohn's disease (CD), colectomy rates in ulcerative colitis (UC), and perianal fistulizing CD outcomes in patients treated with biologics. Current data suggest that serum concentrations of biologics are not associated with an increased risk in postoperative complications following abdominal procedures in IBD. Moreover, higher concentrations of anti-TNF agents are associated with a reduction in colectomy rates in UC. Finally, higher serum drug concentrations are associated with reduced rates of POR after ileocolonic resections and increased rates of perianal fistula healing in CD. TDM is being increasingly used to guide clinical decision making with favorable outcomes in many clinical scenarios. However, given the lack of high quality data deriving mostly from retrospective studies, the evidence supporting the systematic application of TDM in the perioperative setting is still inconclusive.
RESUMO
Introduction: Registries of spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients' follow-up provided evidence that tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) increase the incidence of active tuberculosis infection (TB). However, most of these registries are from low burden TB areas. Few studies evaluated the safety of biologic agents in TB endemic areas. This study compares the TB incidence rate (TB IR) in anti-TNF-naïve and anti-TNF-experienced subjects with SpA in a high TB incidence setting.Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, medical records from patients attending a SpA clinic during 13 years (2004 to 2016) in a university hospital were reviewed. The TB IR was calculated and expressed as number of events per 105 patients/year; the incidence rate ratio (IRR) associated with the use of TNFi was calculated.Results: A total of 277 patients, 173 anti-TNF-naïve and 104 anti-TNF-experienced subjects, were evaluated; 35.7% (N = 35) of patients who were prescribed an anti-TNF drug were diagnosed with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Total follow-up time (person-years) was 1667.8 for anti-TNF-naïve and 394.9 for anti-TNF-experienced patients. TB IR (95% CI) was 299.8 (37.4-562.2) for anti-TNF naïve and 1012.9 (25.3-2000.5) for anti-TNF experienced subjects. The IRR associated with the use of TNFi was 10.4 (2.3- 47.9).Conclusions: In this high TB incidence setting, SpA patients exposed to anti-TNF therapy had a higher incidence of TB compared to anti-TNF-naïve subjects, although the TB incidence in the control group was significant.(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Tuberculose/induzido quimicamente , Tuberculose/epidemiologia , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Espondilartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/efeitos adversos , Espondilite Anquilosante/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seguimentos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Endêmicas , Tuberculose Latente/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
ABSTRACT Most people infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) do not have any signs or disease symptoms, a condition known as latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). The introduction of biological agents, mainly tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases such as Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and other rheumatic diseases, increased the risk of reactivation of LTBI, leading to development of active TB. Thus, this review will approach the aspects related to LTBI in patients with rheumatologic diseases, especially those using iTNF drugs. For this purpose it will be considered the definition and prevalence of LTBI, mechanisms associated with diseases and medications in use, criteria for screening, diagnosis and treatment. Considering that reactivation of LTBI accounts for a large proportion of the incidence of active TB, adequate diagnosis and treatment are crucial, especially in high-risk groups such as patients with rheumatologic diseases.
RESUMO A maioria das pessoas infectadas por Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) não possui sinais ou sintomas da doença, quadro conhecido como infecção latente por tuberculose (ILTB). A introdução de agentes biológicos, sobretudo inibidores do fator de necrose tumoral (iTNF), para o tratamento de doenças imunomediadas, como artrite reumatoide (AR) e outras doenças reumatológicas, aumentou o risco de reativação de ILTB, levando ao desenvolvimento de tuberculose (TB) ativa. Assim, esta revisão abordará os aspectos relacionados à ILTB em pacientes com doenças reumatológicas, especialmente naqueles em uso de medicamentos iTNF. Para tanto, serão considerados a definição e a prevalência de ILTB, os mecanismos associados às doenças e às medicações em uso, bem como os critérios para rastreamento, diagnóstico e tratamento da ILTB. Como a reativação da ILTB é responsável pela grande proporção de casos de TB ativa, o diagnóstico e o tratamento adequados são cruciais, principalmente em grupos de alto risco, como os pacientes com doenças reumatológicas.
Assuntos
Humanos , Doenças Reumáticas/complicações , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Tuberculose Latente/etiologia , Teste Tuberculínico , Fatores de Risco , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Tuberculose Latente/diagnóstico , Tuberculose Latente/tratamento farmacológico , Testes de Liberação de Interferon-gamaRESUMO
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affects young people of reproductive age. Therefore, a broad discussion is needed about the possible disease effects in pregnancy, as well as the risks of fetal exposure to the medications used, especially biological therapy. This study aimed to describe the management of 4 Crohn's disease patients who received anti-TNF therapy during pregnancy and present a literature review. We reported 4 cases composed of young women who became pregnant while receiving anti-TNF agents. The patients presented a satisfactory response to the clinical treatment and the pregnancies progressed without complications. We did not observe maternal or embryonic toxicity, or unfavorable outcomes. The available data point to inflammatory activity as the main risk factor for unfavorable gestational evolution to date, and showed anti-TNF therapy to be safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding. However, the benefits and risks must be discussed with the patient and management decisions should be taken on an individual basis.
RESUMO
The introduction of biological agents, especially the tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNF), for the treatment of rheumatic diseases increased the risk of developing tuberculosis (TB). Screening for latent TB infection (LTBI) is strongly recommended before starting therapy with anti-TNF agents. The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of LTBI and TB among patients with rheumatic diseases on anti-TNF agents. This is a cross-sectional study. The electronic medical records of all adult patients (≥18 years old) undergoing anti-TNF treatment were reviewed. Every patient underwent tuberculin skin test (TST) before starting anti-TNF treatment. In total, 176 patients were included; the mean age was 51.9 ± 12.4 years, 34.7% were males, and 90.9% were white. The underlying diseases were rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 50.6% (N = 89), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in 27.8% (N = 49), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 17.6% (N = 31). The prevalence of positive TST was 29.5%. Household contact with TB was significantly associated with a positive TST (p = 0.020). RA patients had lower TST reactions than AS patients (p = 0.022). There were six cases of TB (3.4%) diagnosed during anti-TNF therapy. We demonstrated a high prevalence of positive TST (29.5%) among patients with rheumatic diseases in a region with high TB prevalence. Our data corroborates the ACR's recommendation that patients who live in high TB incidence settings should be tested annually for LTBI.
Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Tuberculose Latente/etiologia , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose/etiologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Teste Tuberculínico , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidoresRESUMO
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have shown to be at increased risk of developing extraintestinal malignancies. Immunomodulators (immunosuppressant and anti-tumor necrosis factor) diminish the mucosal inflammatory response changing the evolution of the disease, especially when these strategies are introduced earlier. However, therapies that alter the immune system may also promote carcinogenesis. Treatment of IBD in patients with prior malignancy is challenging and the final decision regarding therapeutic strategy should be made on a case-by-case basis. The purpose of this review is to show the characteristics of extra-colonic cancer in patients with IBD, including risks, pathogenesis and management of IBD after cancer diagnosis, the effect of neoplasm treatment on IBD, and the effect of IBD and its treatments on cancer outcomes.
Los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) presentan un mayor riesgo de desarrollar neoplasias extraintestinales. Los inmunomoduladores (inmunosupresores y terapia biológica anti-TNF) disminuyen la respuesta inflamatoria a nivel de la mucosa, modificando la evolución de la enfermedad, especialmente cuando son introducidos precozmente. Sin embargo, estas terapias pueden alterar el sistema inmune y promover la carcinogénesis. El tratamiento de la EII en pacientes con antecedentes de cáncer es un desafío y la decisión final sobre la estrategia terapéutica debe ser determinada caso a caso. Esta revisión tiene como objetivo mostrar las características de las neoplasias extra-intestinales en pacientes con EII, incluyendo los riesgos, patogénesis y manejo de la EII posterior al diagnóstico del cáncer, el efecto de la neoplasia sobre el tratamiento de la EII y el efecto de la EII y su tratamiento sobre el cáncer.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/patologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco , Terapia de Imunossupressão/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/etiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In Brazil, patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have access to free-of-charge comprehensive therapeutic care through the Brazilian National Health System. We collected prospective data on patients with AS receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy through the Brazilian National Health System in Belo Horizonte City in order to evaluate the effectiveness, quality-of-life outcomes and safety of this therapy. METHODS: This was a prospective study that included 87 patients receiving their first course of anti-TNF agents (adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab). The effectiveness of treatment was assessed at 6 and 12 months of follow-up using measures of disease activity [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)], function [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)] and quality of life (EuroQol-5D). Good clinical response was defined as an improvement of at least 50% or 2 units in the BASDAI. Episodes of adverse events were recorded. Logistic regression was performed, and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated to estimate predictors of good clinical response at 6 months. RESULTS: At 6 months of follow-up, 64.9% of patients had a good clinical response, as evidenced by a drop in the median BASDAI score from 5.21 to 2.50 (p < 0.0001) and a reduction in the HAQ score from 1.13 to 0.38 (p < 0.0001). Patients also showed an improvement in health-related quality of life which was sustained after 12 months of follow-up. Female patients achieved a significantly lower clinical response than male patients (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.78), but we observed no significant associations between the other variables. At the end of the study, 93 non-serious adverse events had been reported. CONCLUSION: Treatment with the anti-TNF drugs adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab is effective and well tolerated in patients with AS. The improvement in disease activity, functional parameters and quality of life was sustained for 12 months.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The Brazilian Public Health System offers free-of-charge drug treatment for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) to all Brazilian citizens. We report here the first population-based cohort study on patients with AS in Brazil. The aim of this study was to evaluate the costs of the tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) blockers and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) that were used in the treatments of patients with AS in Brazil between March 2010 and September 2013. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using administrative databases. All patients with a diagnosis of AS who were aged 18 years or older and had been dispensed anti-TNF or DMARDs were included in the analysis. The cost analysis was carried out from the health system perspective, and the results were described as median monthly cost per capita and the annual cost over the study period. RESULTS: A search of the databases identified 1251 patients with AS who were treated during the study period, of whom 63.3% were male; the median age was 41 years. During the study period, 78.0% of patients initiated treatment with anti-TNF drugs and 22.0% with DMARDs. The median monthly cost per capita was US$ 1650 for anti-TNF therapy and US$ 25 for treatment with DMARDs. Among the anti-TNF drugs, therapy with etanercept was associated with the lowest cost per patient, followed by adalimumab and infliximab. No difference in monthly cost was observed in relation to gender and age. CONCLUSION: The cost per patient of treating AS in this study cohort was lower with etanercept than with adalimumab and infliximab. These results highlights the economic burden of treating patients with AS.
RESUMO
OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a resposta clínica após a estratégia de troca entre agentes antifator de necrose tumoral alfa (anti-TNF-alfa) em pacientes com artrite reumatoide (AR). PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos 99 pacientes com diagnóstico de AR (American College of Rheumatology, 1987), em uso de terapia anti-TNF-alfa, para avaliação da resposta terapêutica após 24 semanas. A estratégia de troca foi feita se, após 12 a 24 semanas, houvesse relato de evento adverso sério (T: toxicidade) ou se não ocorresse redução maior que 0,6 do índice de atividade da doença (DAS28) inicial (RI: resposta inadequada). Nesse último caso, o paciente foi considerado como falência primária (FP). Falência secundária (FS) foi definida se houvesse perda de resposta após melhora inicial. Remissão (DAS28 < 2,6), baixa atividade de doença (2,61 < 3,2) e melhora funcional [aumento > 0,2 do questionário de avaliação da saúde (HAQ) inicial] foram avaliadas por análise de regressão linear. P < 0,05 foi considerado significante. RESULTADOS: A estratégia de troca foi realizada em 39 (39,4 por cento) pacientes, especialmente por FP (24,3 por cento), FS (35,1 por cento) e T (40,5 por cento). A taxa de retenção ao primeiro agente foi de 60,1 por cento, e o tempo médio para a troca foi de 14,2 ± 10,9 meses. Após a troca, houve tendência à queda do DAS28 (4,7 ± 1,4; P = 0,08), mas não do HAQ (1,2 ± 0,77; P = 0,11). Cerca de 43 por cento deles alcançaram boa/moderada resposta EULAR. O principal determinante da troca foi o DAS28 inicial mais elevado, independente de idade, tempo de doença e capacidade funcional. CONCLUSÃO: A estratégia de troca entre agentes anti-TNF-alfa é válida para o controle da atividade de doença, embora com baixa probabilidade de remissão e sem melhora significativa da capacidade funcional.
OBJECTIVES: To assess clinical response after switching between anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-alpha) agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 99 patients diagnosed with RA American College of Rheumatology, 1987), on anti-TNF-alpha therapy, to assess the therapeutic response after 24 weeks. Switching was performed if, after 12 to 24 weeks, a severe adverse event was reported (toxicity: T) or if no reduction greater than 0.6 in the initial Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) occurred (inadequate response: IR). In case of IR, the patient was considered as primary failure (PF). Secondary failure (SF) was defined as loss of response after initial improvement. Remission (DAS28 < 2.6), low disease activity (between 2.61 and 3.2), and functional improvement [increase in the initial Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) > 0.2] were assessed by use of linear regression analysis. The significance level adopted was P < 0.05. RESULTS: Switching was performed in 39 (39.4 percent) patients, especially due to PF (24.3 percent), SF (35.1 percent) and T (40.5 percent). The retention rate of the first agent was 60.1 percent, and the mean time for switching was 14.2 ± 10.9 months. After switching, a tendency towards a decrease in DAS28 was observed (4.7 ± 1.4; P = 0.08), but not in the HAQ (1.2 ± 0.77; P = 0.11). Around 43 percent of the patients achieved good/moderate EULAR response. The major determinant of switching was a higher initial DAS28, independent of age, duration of disease, and functional capacity. CONCLUSION: Switching between anti-TNF-alpha agents is a valid strategy to control disease activity, despite the low likelihood of remission and no significant improvement in functional capacity.