Assessing a cut-off point for the diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding using the Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (MBQ): a validation and cultural translation study with Brazilian women

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a common condition, and the Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (MBQ) is used for its assessment. OBJECTIVES: To translate, assess the cut-off point for diagnosis, and explore psychometric properties of the MBQ for use in Brazilian Portuguese. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study including 200 women (100 with and 100 without AUB) at a tertiary referral center. METHODS: MBQ translation involved a pilot-testing phase, instrument adjustment, data collection, and back-translation. Cut-off point was obtained using receiver operating curve analysis. Menstrual patterns, impact on quality of life due to AUB, internal consistency, test-retest, responsiveness, and discriminant validity were assessed. For construct validity, the Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) and World Health Organization Quality of Life - abbreviated version (WHOQOL-BREF) were applied. RESULTS: Women with AUB were older, had higher body mass indices, and had a worse quality of life during menstruation. Regarding the MBQ's psychometric variables, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was > 0.70 in all analyses, high intraclass correlation coefficient was found in both groups; no ceiling and floor effects were observed, and construct validity was demonstrated (correlation between MBQ score, PBAC score, and clinical menstrual cycle data). No difference between MBQ and PBAC scores were perceived after the test-retest. Significant differences were found between MBQ and PBAC scores before and after treatment. An MBQ score ≥ 24 was associated with a high probability of AUB; accuracy of 98%. CONCLUSION: The MBQ is a reliable questionnaire for Brazilian women. The cut-off ≥ 24 shows high accuracy to discriminate AUB.

Utility of the Pediatric Bleeding Questionnaire in Predicting Posttonsillectomy Bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: Posttonsillectomy bleeding is a dreadful complication that may be life-threatening. Preoperative coagulation tests have not been shown to be effective in predicting this complication. The Pediatric Bleeding Questionnaire (PBQ) is a validated and sensitive tool in diagnosing children with abnormal hemostatic functions, and the objective of our study was to assess its utility as a preoperative screening tool for predicting posttonsillectomy bleeding. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective single-blinded cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital system. METHODS: All children scheduled for tonsil surgery between 2017 and 2019 in the Galilee Medical Center were included. The PBQ was completed by the caregivers prior to surgery, and all children underwent coagulation tests. Each PBQ item is scored on a scale of -1 to 4, and the total score per candidate is based on summation of all items. RESULTS: An overall 272 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 5.2 years; 57.7% were boys. The main finding was that in a multivariable model adjusted to age, a PBQ score of 2 is correlated with increased postoperative bleeding risk (odds ratio, 10.018 [95% CI, 1.20-82.74]; P = .046). The results of the PBQ demonstrated better predictive ability when compared with abnormal coagulation test results (odds ratio, 1.76 [95% CI, 0.63-4.80]; P = .279). Sex was not found to be significant (odds ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.70-3.18]; P = .343). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a PBQ score ≥2 has a higher yield for detecting children at risk for posttonsil surgery bleeding as compared with coagulation studies.

Prediction of bleeding and prophylactic platelet transfusions in cancer patients with thrombocytopenia.

Studies on markers for bleeding risk among thrombocytopenic cancer patients are lacking. This prospective observational cohort study investigated whether platelet parameters and a standardised bleeding questionnaire predicted bleeding or prophylactic platelet transfusions in patients with cancer and thrombocytopenia. Admitted adult patients with cancer and platelet count <80 × 10(9)/L were enrolled, but excluded if they experienced surgery or trauma within 7 days or platelet transfusion within 14 days. Patients were interviewed, blood samples collected and, subsequently, spontaneous bleeding and prophylactic platelet transfusion within 30 days were registered. Of 197 patients enrolled, 56 (28%) experienced bleeding. In multivariate analyses, predictors of bleeding were infection (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.65 and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.04-6.74); treatment with platelet inhibitors, heparin or warfarin OR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.23-4.48; urea nitrogen OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.25; creatinine OR = 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.01; and haemoglobin OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.93. Specific information regarding previous gastrointestinal bleeding OR = 3.33, 95% CI 1.19-9.34 and haematuria OR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.20-7.52 predicted bleeding whereas the standardised bleeding questionnaire did not. Prophylactic platelet transfusions were administered to 97 patients. Predictors of prophylactic platelet transfusions were: platelet count OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.97; fibrinogen OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.95; mean platelet volume OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.97; platelet aggregometry with OR = 2.48, 95% CI 1.09-5.64 for collagen-induced platelet aggregation within the lowest quartile; and albumin OR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.15. In conclusion, except for immature platelet fraction (IPF), platelet parameters predicted prophylactic platelet transfusion but not bleeding. Bleeding risk factors were previous haematuria or gastrointestinal bleeding, infection, antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment, high urea nitrogen, low haemoglobin or high creatinine.

Ability of hemostatic assessment to detect bleeding disorders and to predict abnormal surgical blood loss in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Systematic preoperative coagulation testing is still widely used in children scheduled for surgery, although current guidelines recommend that a bleeding history should be the first choice for hemostatic assessment. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate the pertinence of bleeding questionnaire and screening laboratory testing to detect bleeding disorders (BDs) in children and to predict abnormal surgical blood loss. METHODS: A search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE(R), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Health technology Assessment, and all EBM Reviews (Cochrane DSR, ACP Journal Club, DARE, CCTR, CMR, HTA, and NHSEED and EBM Reviews) up to October 22, 2013. Prospective trials containing 20 children or more and any tests evaluating either the ability of the test to detect a congenital BD or the ability of the test to predict increased surgical blood loss were retained. The quality of the study was judged with the Cochrane Collaboration Tool and two investigators extracted data independently. Data were combined to calculate the pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI 95%). I(2) statistics were used to assess statistics heterogeneity. RESULTS: Data could be extracted from 16 studies. Best results for detecting a congenital abnormality at potential risk for increased surgical blood loss were obtained with the PFA-100 (DOR = 113.0; 95% CI, 22.6-566.2; I(2) = 0%) in two studies, followed by the bleeding time in two other studies (DOR = 110.7; 95% CI, 24.4-502.3; I(2) = 0%). With a high amount of heterogeneity, questionnaires showed disappointing performances (DOR = 7.9; 95% CI: 3.5-17.5; I(2) = 72.6%). CONCLUSION: Current evidence does not identify a tool that adequately predicts BDs and/or abnormal surgical blood loss in children. Questionnaires currently available do not perform well. In the setting of a pediatric coagulation clinic, the PFA-100 has the highest chance of detecting a BD. This meta-analysis highlights the weakness of the literature regarding the prediction of perioperative bleeding due to congenital hemostatic disorders in children.

Utility of a Paediatric Bleeding Questionnaire as a screening tool for von Willebrand disease in apparently healthy children.

UNLABELLED: von Willebrand disease (VWD), an inherited bleeding disorder caused by deficiency or dysfunction of von Willebrand factor (VWF) is diagnosed when a personal and often a family history of excessive mucocutaneous bleeding is present along with abnormal laboratory studies. An accurate assessment of haemorrhagic symptoms is key in suspecting VWD but presents a challenge especially in children due to overlap between normal and abnormal bleeding. Bleeding questionnaire (BQ) scores have been validated in adults and have recently been validated in children with VWD for assessing bleeding severity. However, there are limited data supporting their use prospectively in healthy children with bleeding complaints. AIM: The objectives of this study were to obtain normative data from children and validate a paediatric BQ (PBQ) to determine the discriminative ability of its total score and its individual components for identifying children likely to have VWD. METHODS: The PBQ was administered to 1281 multiethnic, healthy children between 30 days and 18 years of age presenting to a general paediatric office and to 35 children with VWD based on VWF antigen, activity and multimer pattern. RESULTS: When children with total BQ scores of 3 or more were predicted to have VWD, the sensitivity was 97.2%, the specificity was 97.1%, the positive predictive value was 48.6% and the negative predictive value was 99.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The PBQ may help discriminate a significant bleeding history from trivial bleeding, may be integrated into the primary care algorithm for evaluating children suspected with VWD.

Comprehensive evaluation of hemostasis in normal women: impact on the diagnosis of mild bleeding disorders.

Women with mild bleeding disorders (MBDs) pose a diagnostic challenge and menorrhagia, the most common presenting symptom that remains underreported. We tested the hypothesis that screening apparently normal females using general and gynecological bleeding assessment tools and a global hemostatic assay together with platelet aggregation can help predict MBDs. We assessed 47 women using electronic bleeding assessment tools; e-bleeding questionnaire; and e-Pictorial Bleeding Assessment Chart (e-PBAC) based on previously validated methods, thrombelastography (TEG), and platelet aggregation together with basic coagulation testing. Three women had elevated bleeding score with von Willebrand disease diagnosis confirmed in one case and eleven cases had elevated e-PBAC. We report normal ranges for TEG and platelet aggregation in women during the first half of the menstrual cycle and show 23.4% of apparently normal women may have general or heavy menstrual bleeding. This is a prelude to a larger study to determine the validity of bleeding assessment tools in screening for MBDs in women.

Normal range of bleeding scores for the ISTH-BAT: adult and pediatric data from the merging project.

Bleeding Assessment Tools (BATs) have been developed to aid in the standardized evaluation of bleeding symptoms. The Vicenza Bleeding Questionnaire (BQ), published in 2005, established a common framework and scoring key that has undergone subsequent modification over the years, culminating in the publication of the ISTH-BAT in 2010. Understanding the normal range of bleeding scores is critical when assessing the utility of a BAT. Within the context of The Merging Project, a bioinformatics system was created to facilitate the merging of legacy data derived from four different (but all Vicenza-based) BATs; the MCMDM1-VWD BQ, the Condensed MCMDM-1VWD BQ, the Pediatric Bleeding Questionnaire and the ISTH-BAT. Data from 1040 normal adults and 328 children were included in the final analysis, which showed that the normal range is 0-3 for adult males, 0-5 for adult females and 0-2 in children for both males and females. Therefore, the cut-off for a positive or abnormal BS is ≥4 in adult males, ≥6 in adult females and ≥3 in children. This information can now be used to objectively assess bleeding symptoms as normal or abnormal in future studies.