Prevalence and trends of contact sensitization in patients with psoriasis in Lithuania.

Background: Psoriasis and allergic contact dermatitis are 2 very common dermatoses. The relationship between them has not yet been fully understood. Contact dermatitis can be an additional cause of epidermal disruption in psoriasis patients, resulting in poor management of the disease. Objective: To analyze the tendencies of contact sensitization in a cohort of psoriasis patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Methods: Psoriasis patients (n = 85) with suspected contact dermatitis underwent patch testing with European Baseline allergen series S-1000 in Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos Centre of Dermatovenereology from August 2020 to August 2021. Their results are presented in this study. Results: The patch test was positive in 43.5% (n = 37) of patients. Contact sensitization was more prevalent in patients with mild psoriasis, as characterized by Psoriasis Area Surface Index scores ≤10, compared to those with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (P < .05). Generalized psoriasis and nail involvement were more common among nonsensitized patients (P < .05). Most common contact allergens among sensitized patients were nickel (II) sulfate, formaldehyde, and potassium dichromate. Conclusion: An inverse trend was observed between psoriasis severity and contact sensitization. Extended psoriatic involvement was uncommon in sensitized patients.

Patch testing while immunosuppressed: potential risks and benefits.

INTRODUCTION: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common cutaneous inflammatory skin disorder that is diagnosed via epicutaneous patch testing (PT). ACD may also coexist with other systemic inflammatory conditions such as atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Many of the treatments used to manage severe ACD, along with other systemic conditions, interact with and suppress the immune system, thereby potentially interfering with the mechanism of PT. There is uncertainty in the literature regarding the effects of immunosuppression on the results of PT. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify articles relevant to the topic of this review. Only articles available in English were included. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses the impact of immunomodulating therapies on the results of PT. We summarize the available evidence and provide updated recommendations for several immunomodulating drugs commonly used in patients undergoing PT. EXPERT OPINION: In general, the results of PT are most reliable when performed without immunosuppression. If this is not feasible, it is best to have patients on as low a dose of immunosuppression as possible, but it may not be necessary to stop or change an immunomodulating drug prior to PT.

A Retrospective Analysis to Investigate Contact Sensitization in Greek Population Using Classic and Machine Learning Techniques.

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is an inflammatory reaction affecting all age groups and both sexes. ACD is characterized by a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction IV caused by skin contact with haptens. Chronic exposure typically leads to a decrease in erythema accompanied by lichenification (thickening and hardening of the skin) and persistent itching. The current study aims to investigate the patterns of contact sensitization in the Greek population using patch test data analysis. Patch test data from 240 patients (120 Males/120 Females) with allergic contact dermatitis were collected at the Laboratory for Patch Testing, National Reference Center for Occupational Dermatoses "Andreas Syggros" Hospital in Athens Greece. The contact allergic reactions were caused by ethylenediamine dihydrochloride 1%, thimerosal 0.5%, and methyldibromo-glutaronitrile 0.1% from the European baseline series of allergens; information was also collected for ICDRG evaluation, an extended MOAHLFA index and patient-reported outcomes (daily routine questionnaire). The chi-square test for independence and Spearman's rank were used to evaluate the association and correlation, respectively, between patient characteristics and ACD-related factors. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA), which is a data analysis approach, was used to find and depict underlying structures in the data collection for nominal categorical data. Statistically significant associations were found between the following pairs of characteristics: eczema triggers and gender and eczema triggers and hand dermatitis. The results from MCA showed that there is correlation between allergic contact dermatitis onset, allergens, and demographic variables.

Incidence and prevalence of occupational contact dermatitis in hairdressing apprentices: A 3-year prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: It is known that a large number of hairdressing apprentices (HA) develop occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) during schooling, but studies that address prevalence of contact sensitization in HAs with hand eczema are missing. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence, incidence rate and clinical characteristics of OCD, including contact sensitization, in a sample of Croatian HAs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 408 HAs from 25 Croatian towns were examined at the beginning of education and monitored at the end of each school year. Clinical evaluation of skin changes was performed using the Osnabrueck Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI). Standard patch test (PT) with baseline and hairdresser series of contact allergens was performed in 46 HAs with skin changes lasting ≥3 months. RESULTS: The overall incidence rate of OCD was 32.3/100 person-years, and the 3-year prevalence 50.3%. Contact sensitization was found in 14 out of 46 (30.3%) HAs, with 10 of these 14 HAs (71.4%) sensitized to specific hairdressing allergens. The strongest reactions were found to PPD. HAs with positive PT had higher OHSI than HAs with negative patch test (median, IQR: 3, 2-4 vs. 2, 2-4). CONCLUSIONS: Contact sensitization to specific hairdressing chemicals was found in 71.4% of HAs with a positive patch test, supporting evidence on the early contact sensitization to occupational allergens among HAs.

Patch testing with the European baseline series and 10 added allergens: Single-centre study of 748 patients.

BACKGROUND: The European baseline series (EBS) of contact allergens is subject to change. An allergen is considered for inclusion when routine patch testing of patients with suspected contact dermatitis results in ≥0.5% prevalence rate. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the frequency of sensitizations to 30 EBS allergens and 10 locally added allergens. Additionally, we assessed the strength and evolution of reactions to all tested allergens and co-reactivity of additional allergens. METHODS: Patch testing with our baseline series of 40 allergens was done in 748 consecutive adults. Tests were applied to the upper back and removed by patients after 48 h. Readings were done on Day 3 (D3) and D6 or D7 (D6/7). Positive reactions fulfilled the criteria of at least one plus (+) reaction. A retrospective analysis was done. RESULTS: Eight allergens not listed in the EBS had ≥0.5% prevalence rate (i.e., cocamidopropyl betaine, thiomersal, disperse blue mix 106/124, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, diazolidinyl urea, propylene glycol, Compositae mix II and dexamethasone-21-phosphate), and 16.6% of positive reactions would have been missed without D6/7 readings. CONCLUSION: We propose further studies to evaluate whether cocamidopropyl betaine, disperse blue mix 106/124, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, diazolidinyl urea and Compositae mix II need to be added to the EBS.

A systematic review on the treatment of pediatric severe alopecia areata by topical immunotherapy or Anthralin (contact sensitization) or low-level light/laser therapy (LLLT): focus on efficacy, safety, treatment duration, recurrence, and follow-up based on clinical studies.

INTRODUCTION: Alopecia areata (AA) in its extensive and severe forms is treatment-challenging, especially in pediatrics. METHOD: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of seven electronic databases was searched by the terms "alopecia areata," "pediatric," "topical immunotherapy," "Anthralin," and "light therapy" from inception until March 2021. All the alternative names of the disease and therapies have been included in the search terms. 790 articles went to title abstract review by two independent reviewers. In the subsequent level, a review of the full text of studies was conducted. RESULTS: Finally, 10 relevant articles in terms of content structure, subject coverage, and purpose, were selected for further review. The highest percentages of complete hair regrowth were 79.6% and 63.61% by SADBE (topical immunotherapy) and laser therapy. By Anthralin (contact sensitization), the complete response rate was below 50% (between 30 and 35%). Regarding average response, the most effective methods were local immunotherapy (with an average effectiveness of 53.8%), laser therapy (52.55%), and the use of Anthralin-induced contact dermatitis (30.86%), respectively. However, recurrence rate-after treatment with induced contact dermatitis by topical medications like Anthralin (contact sensitization)-was lower (mean 43.53%) in comparison with local immunotherapy (57%). In topical immunotherapy, light base therapy, and contact sensitization, the highest percentage of complete hair regrowth and the average response rate were (63.61% and 52.55%), (79.6% and 53.8%) and (32% and 30.8%), respectively. These methods are considered safe in children. CONCLUSION: A high and more than 50% efficacy in hair regrowth could be expected by topical immunotherapy and light/laser therapy method. No serious side effects have been observed by these methods that are well tolerated in children. Therefore, a combination of local immunotherapy and light/laser therapy could be suggested for the treatment of extensive AA in children. The use of Anthralin could be associated with a lower but more durable response. These points are important for patient selection in individualized situations.

An observational study to determine the sensitizing potential of orthopedic implants.

INTRODUCTION: Patients who receive orthopedic implants have been shown to develop sensitivity to its components and there are concerns that this sensitivity might lead to contact dermatitis or implant-related problems like loosening and/or failure. The objective of the study was to determine the sensitizing potential of orthopedic implants. METHODS: Fifty-four patients undergoing knee, hip, or shoulder replacement surgeries between July 2014 and July 2015 were recruited. Patch tests were performed before the implant surgery with 10 allergens likely to be implicated in metal hypersensitivity. Postimplant patch test was performed 6 months after surgery. A majority of the patch tests were applied on the arms. RESULTS: Four positive reactions were recorded in the preimplant patch tests - three positive reactions to nickel and one to chromium. Thirty patients made themselves available for the follow-up patch test. The incidence of new contact sensitivity to components of implants was 13.8% (4/29) at 6 months. One patient who had undergone knee replacement developed eczematous lesions around the knee joint after surgery. This patient tested negative to patch test at both the times. LIMITATIONS: Short follow-up duration and performing patch tests on the arms, a site known to elicit less positive patch test response compared to the back in sensitized individuals, are limitations of the study. CONCLUSION: There is an increase in the sensitivity to implanted components after 6 months of joint replacement surgery. The incidence of new sensitivity to a component of the implant was 13.8% (4/29). In this context, nickel is a good sensitizer and could sensitize 50% of patients who received a nickel-containing implant.

Suitable test concentration of cobalt and concomitant reactivity to nickel and chromium: A multicentre study from the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group.

BACKGROUND: In Sweden, cobalt chloride 0.5% has been included in the baseline series since the mid-1980s. A recent study from Stockholm showed that cobalt chloride 1% petrolatum (pet.) was more suitable than 0.5%. Cobalt chloride at 1.0% has been patch tested for decades in many European countries and around the world. OBJECTIVES: To study the suitability of patch testing to cobalt 1.0% vs 0.5% and to analyze the co-occurrence of allergy to cobalt, chromium, and nickel. RESULTS: Contact allergy to cobalt was shown in 90 patients (6.6%). Eighty (5.9%) patients tested positive to cobalt 1.0%. Thirty-seven of the 90 patients (41.1%) with cobalt allergy were missed by cobalt 0.5% and 10 (0.7%) were missed by cobalt 1.0% (P < .001). No case of patch test sensitization was reported. Allergy to chromium was seen in 2.6% and allergy to nickel in 13.3%. Solitary allergy to cobalt without nickel allergy was shown in 61.1% of cobalt-positive individuals. Female patients had larger proportions of positive reactions to cobalt (P = .036) and nickel (P < .001) than males. CONCLUSION: The results speak in favor of replacing cobalt chloride 0.5% with cobalt chloride 1.0% pet. in the Swedish baseline series, which will be done 2021.

Contact sensitization to cosmetic series of allergens in female patients with rosacea: A prospective controlled study in China.

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics (ACDC) complicates the diagnosis and treatment of rosacea, and is increasingly observed in daily practice. AIMS: The present study aimed to identify the contact allergens responsible for ACDC in Chinese female rosacea patients with or without suspected ACDC (SACDC). METHODS: From a total of 1267 women with rosacea, 122 with SACDC, 145 without SACDC, and 100 age-matched healthy controls without rosacea or SACDC were examined on a voluntary basis. Skin patch tests with C-1000 cosmetic series (Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Malmo, Sweden) were conducted, including 20 selected allergens. RESULTS: Positive allergic reaction was found in 85.2% and 33.8% of SACDC and non-SACDC (P < .001), respectively, and 27.0% of healthy volunteers. Most reactions occurred at day 3, and the majority of all the examinees including normal controls reacted to more than 1 allergen. In SACDC patients, leading allergens were methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (28.7%), linalool hydroperoxide (27.1%), fragrance mix I (21.3%), methylisothiazolinone (17.2%), limonene hydroperoxides (16.4%), formaldehyde (14.8%), myroxylon pereirae (13.9%), and propolis (10.7%); the overall allergic reaction rate positively correlated with new onset of facial pruritus (P < .001). The occurrence of irritant contact reactions correlated with positive allergic reactions in rosacea patients with or without SACDC (P = .032 or P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Preservatives and fragrances are primary culprits for ACDC in Chinese female rosacea patients. Patch testing should be considered in the suspected patients.

Can patch testing with methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone be optimized using a new diagnostic mix? - A multicenter study from the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group.

BACKGROUND: Methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) and methylisothiazolinone (MI) are tested to detect contact allergy to these isothiazolinones. OBJECTIVES: To study if an aqueous patch test preparation with MCI and MI in a mix of 0.015% and 0.2%, respectively, detects more contact allergies than the commonly used preparations of MCI/MI in 0.02% aq. and MI in 0.2% aq. METHODS: A total of 1555 patients with dermatitis in five Swedish dermatology departments were tested consecutively with MCI/MI 0.215% aq., MCI/MI 0.02% aq., and MI 0.2% aq. RESULTS: The share of contact allergy to MCI/MI 0.215% aq., MCI/MI 0.02% aq., and MI 0.2% aq. varied in the test centers between 7.9% and 25.9%, 3.2% and 10.3%, and 5.8% and 12.3%, respectively. MCI/MI 0.215% aq. detected significantly more patch-test positive individuals than both MCI/MI 0.02% aq. (P < .001) and MI 0.2% aq. (P < .001), as well as either one of MCI/MI and MI (P < .001). In the patients only reacting to MCI/MI 0.215% aq., 57.7% were recorded as having a dermatitis that was explained or aggravated by exposure to either MCI/MI or MI. CONCLUSION: The results speak in favor of replacing the preparations MCI/MI 0.02% aq. and MI 0.2% aq. with MCI/MI 0.215% aq. as the screening substance in the Swedish baseline series, which has been implemented in 2020.

[How common is fragrance allergy really?] / Wie häufig ist die Duftstoffallergie wirklich?

BACKGROUND: Fragrances are regarded as the most common contact allergens after nickel. In this context, the frequency of positive patch test reactions to fragrance mix is often presented as proof. According to EU regulation No. 1223/2009, 26 fragrances that are regarded as significant allergens have to be declared on cosmetic products. OBJECTIVES: The frequency of patch test reactions to fragrances and differentiation between frequently and rarely sensitizing fragrances were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), mostly of the years 2016-2018, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Frequency of positive reactions to fragrance mix I in the departments of dermatology joining the IVDK reached a historical low of 5.4% in 2018. Since 2013, positive reactions to fragrance mix II have been declining, yielding 3.2% in 2018. Of fragrance mix I, the allergen with the most positive test reactions is no longer oakmoss absolute, but isoeugenol. In fragrance mix II, hydroxyisohexyl 3­cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC) is still leading. Only 11 of the 26 fragrances subject to mandatory declaration elicited allergic test reactions in more than 1% of the patients tested. DISCUSSION: The decline of positive test reactions to the fragrance mixes is mainly due to the reduced use of oakmoss containing atranol and chloroatranol, and HICC. Use of these substances in cosmetic products was prohibited within the EU starting in August 2019. Therefore, a further decline of the sensitization frequencies can be expected. A differentiated consideration of the individual fragrances under allergological aspects is urgently required.

[Preservative allergy : An enduring issue]. / Dauerbrenner Konservierungsmittelallergie : Was geht, was kommt, was bleibt?

BACKGROUND: Preservatives in cosmetics are often suspected as contact sensitizers and hence frequently patch tested in dermatitis patients. Exposure in this field has changed over the course of years. OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of contact sensitization to various preservatives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective data analysis from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) for the years 2009-2018. RESULTS: Frequency of sensitization to methylisothiazolinone (MI) has increased from 2.0% in 2009 to 7.2% in 2013. Since 2014, the rate has been falling again. Increasing the patch test concentration of methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDBGN) in 2016 has caused a sudden rise in positive patch test reactions from 2.0% to more than 4.5%. Allergic reactions to other preservatives occurred in less than 1% of the patients tested. DISCUSSION: Since 2014, the worldwide "epidemic" of sensitization to MI has been subsiding in Central Europe, thanks to corresponding restrictions on use. Since 2008, there is no longer any widespread exposure to MDBGN; the new, higher test concentration elicits many false-positive test reactions and explains the sudden rise in positive patch test reactions since 2016. Despite widespread use, phenoxyethanol, benzoates, benzyl alcohol, parabens and sorbates rarely cause allergic reactions. Therefore, they can be recommended for cosmetics from the epidemiological-allergological point of view.

The methylisothiazolinone epidemic goes along with changing patients' characteristics - After cosmetics, industrial applications are the focus.

BACKGROUND: Sensitization to methylisothiazolinone (MI) has seen an exceptional epidemic, mainly attributed to its use in cosmetics. OBJECTIVES: To trace the epidemic of MI allergy (2009-2018), and to analyze a possible change of patients' characteristics. METHODS: Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken-data of patients patch tested between 2009 and 2018 with MI (0.05% aq.) were analyzed concerning anamnestic items and sensitization frequencies. RESULTS: Overall, 4.9% reacted positive to MI. Comparing sensitization to MI in three periods (2009, 2013/14, and 2017/18), there was an increase to 7% in 2013 and a decrease to 3.4% in 2018. The MOAHLFA Index (M=Men, O=Occupational Dermatitis, A=Atopic Dermatitis, L=Leg Dermatitis, F=Face Dermatitis, A= Age > 40) for the period 2013/14 is characterized by a lower proportion of occupational dermatitis and a higher proportion of face dermatitis. The period 2017/18 is characterized by increases of occupational dermatitis and hand dermatitis, and a decrease of face dermatitis. Painters, personal care workers, and hairdressers were particularly affected. Sensitization in hairdressers and personal care workers (mostly cosmeticians) decreased after the peak in 2013/14, whereas sensitization to MI in painters continued to increase. CONCLUSIONS: After an unprecedented epidemic of MI allergy, mainly caused by its use in cosmetics, the continuous use of MI in industrial applications, for example, paints, and subsequent sensitization remain a matter of concern.

[Pathogenesis of hand eczema]. / Pathogenese des Handekzems.

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of hand eczema is multifactorial. Exogenous factors such as skin irritation and contact sensitization contribute to this as well as an endogenous atopic predisposition. OBJECTIVE: This article provides a review of the pathogenetic factors relevant to the development of hand eczema. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An evaluation of the current literature on the pathogenesis of hand eczema was carried out. RESULTS: Impairment of the epidermal barrier function plays an essential role for the development of hand eczema. The molecular biological basis and the possible significance of a genetic predisposition beyond atopy are not yet fully understood. Immunological processes involved in the pathogenesis of allergic contact dermatitis and atopic eczema are likely to play a role in the development of certain subtypes of hand eczema. This might contribute to an expansion of the therapeutic armamentarium for hand eczema in the future. CONCLUSION: The exact understanding of the individual pathogenesis in single hand eczema patients is essential in order to provide specific advice on allergen avoidance, skin protection and basic treatment and to initiate appropriate therapeutic measures.