Application of Diagnostic Stewardship to Fungal Polymerase Chain Reaction: Low Yield of Follow-up Testing on Plasma and Bronchoalveolar Lavage After a Negative Result.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of invasive fungal disease is essential for optimizing management. Although the clinical utility of fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has been established, the role of follow-up testing remains unclear. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center study. The yield of follow-up PCR for Aspergillus species, Mucorales agents, Fusarium species, Scedosporium species, dimorphic fungi, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and Candida species on plasma and/or BAL was measured at intervals of 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks following a negative result. RESULTS: A total of 1389 follow-up tests on 406 plasma specimens from 264 patients and 983 BAL specimens from 431 patients were evaluated. Overall, the positivity rate at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks was 2.7% (4/148), 3.3% (4/123), 5.1% (4/78), and 3.5% (2/57), respectively, on plasma, and 0% (0/333), 0.3% (1/288), 0.4% (1/228), and 0.7% (1/134), respectively, on BAL. Conversions occurred with Aspergillus species, Mucorales agents, and Fusarium species PCR on plasma and Aspergillus species and P jirovecii PCR on BAL. All patients who converted were immunocompromised. Within 1 week of a prior negative test, 2 Aspergillus and 2 Mucorales PCRs were positive on plasma, and zero tests were positive on BAL. In week 1, only 1 Aspergillus species that was positive on day 7 was classified as probable fungal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Fungal PCR follow-up testing on plasma and BAL within 4 weeks of a prior negative result was of low yield and rarely generated a positive result considered clinically significant in the first week.

A Diagnostic Stewardship Intervention to Improve Utilization of 1,3 ß-D-Glucan Testing at a Single Academic Center: Five-Year Experience.

Background: (1,3)- ß-D-glucan (BDG) testing is one of the noninvasive tests to aid diagnosis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). The study results have been heterogenous, and diagnostic performance varies depending on the risks for IFI. Thus, it is important to select appropriate patients for BDG testing to prevent false-positive results. An algorithmic diagnostic stewardship intervention was instituted at a single academic medical center to improve BDG test utilization. Methods: The BDG test order in the electronic health record was replaced with the BDG test request order, which required approval to process the actual test order. The approval criteria were (1) immunocompromised or intensive care unit patient and (2) on empiric antifungal therapy, or inability to undergo invasive diagnostic procedures. A retrospective observational study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention by comparing the number of BDG tests performed between 1 year pre- and post-intervention. Safety was assessed by chart review of the patients for whom BDG test requests were deemed inappropriate and rejected. Results: The number of BDG tests performed per year decreased by 85% from 156 in the pre-intervention period to 24 in the post-intervention period. The average monthly number of BDG tests performed was significantly lower between those periods (P = .002). There was no delay in IFI diagnosis or IFI-related deaths in the patients whose BDG test requests were rejected. The sustained effectiveness of the intervention was observed for 5 years. Conclusions: Institution of the diagnostic stewardship intervention successfully and safely improved BDG test utilization.

Aerobic vaginitis: antibiotic resistance trend and future actions of antimicrobial diagnostic stewardship.

The study objective is to examine epidemiological and microbiological aspects of aerobic vaginitis in female patients admitted to University Hospital of Campania "L. Vanvitelli" over five years. The most represented strains were E. coli (n = 153), Citrobacter spp. increasing from 2020, E. faecalis (n = 149), S. haemolitycus (n = 61), and Candida albicans (n = 87). The susceptibility patterns of a selection of gram-negative and gram-positive representative bacterial isolates were examined. Carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and fosfomycin were most effective against gram-negative bacteria, whereas vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid exhibited greater efficacy against gram-positive bacteria. None of the E. coli and Citrobacter spp. isolates produced extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, and the S. haemolyticus strains were methicillin-resistant. In gram-positive isolates, gentamicin susceptibility increased in 2020 and 2021 compared to clindamycin; erythromycin showed high resistance rates in 2020. Our findings indicate that integrating proper microbiological cultures into clinical practice could improve the management of aerobic vaginitis. Moreover, they highlight the necessity of establishing a nationwide surveillance guideline to mitigate antimicrobial resistance. Improvement actions in antimicrobial diagnostic stewardship must be considered when seeking the appropriate diagnosis and treatment for aerobic vaginitis.

Improvement in Diagnosis and Management of Nosocomial Pneumonias in a Cardiovascular Surgery Intensive Care Unit: A Multidisciplinary Approach.

BACKGROUND: While criteria for the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonias exist, objective definitions are a challenge and there is no gold standard for diagnosis. We analyzed the impact of the implementation of a logical, consensus-based diagnostic and treatment protocol for managing nosocomial pneumonias in the cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit (CVS-ICU). METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental, interrupted time series analysis to evaluate the impact of a diagnostic and treatment protocol for nosocomial pneumonias in the CVS-ICU. Impacts were measured relative to patient outcomes, diagnostic processes, and antimicrobial stewardship improvement. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze results. RESULTS: Overall, 35 pre-protocol and 39 post-protocol patients were included. Primary clinical variables suggesting pneumonia in pre- and post-protocol patients were new lung consolidation (50% vs. 71%), new leukocytosis (59% vs. 64%), and positive culture (32% vs. 55%). Appropriate diagnostic testing improved (23% vs. 54%, p = 0.008) after protocol implementation. The proportion of patients meeting the criteria for nosocomial pneumonia (77% vs. 87%) was not statistically significant, though more patients in the post-protocol group met probable diagnostic criteria (51% vs. 77%). Duration of therapy was not significantly different (6 days [IQR = 5.0, 10.0] vs. 7 days [IQR = 6.0, 9.0]). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a diagnostic and treatment protocol for management of nosocomial pneumonias in the CVS-ICU resulted in improved diagnostic accuracy, advanced antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship efforts, and laboratory cost savings without an adverse impact on patient-centered outcomes.

Diagnostic Stewardship in Clinical Microbiology: An Indispensable Component of Patient Care.

Emerging infectious diseases and increasing resistance to available antimicrobials are mapping the evolution of clinical microbiology and escalating the nature of undertakings required. Rapid diagnosis has become the need of the hour, which can affect diagnostic algorithms and therapeutic decisions simultaneously. Subsequently, the concept of 'diagnostic stewardship' was introduced into clinical practice for coherent implementation of available diagnostic modalities to ensure that these new rapid diagnostic technologies are conserved, rather than consumed as part of health care resources, with a view to improve the patient care and reduce Turnaround Time (TAT) and treatment expense. The present study highlights the requisite of diagnostic stewardship and outlines the infectious disease diagnostic modalities that can assist in its successful implementation. Diagnostic stewardship promotes precise, timely diagnostics, from the initial specimen collection and identification to reporting with appropriate TAT, so as to enable timely management of the patient. The main aim of diagnostic stewardship is to optimize the right choice of diagnostic test for the right patient to attain clinically significant reports with the least possible TAT for timely management and the least expected adverse effects for the patient, community, and the healthcare system. This underlines the requisite of a multifaceted approach to make technological advancements effective and successful for implementation as a part of diagnostic stewardship for the best patient care.

Utility of microbial cell free DNA next-generation sequencing for diagnosis and management of infectious diseases.

Microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing is a promising tool to identify infectious pathogens when traditional methods fail to identify the causative agent. We performed a retrospective observational cohort study to evaluate clinical outcomes among pediatric and adult patients who underwent mcfDNA testing. 127 mcfDNA tests were reviewed from 112 patients. Baseline characteristics included 61 (54.5 %) adults, 52 (40.9 %) tests were from female patients, and 67 (52.8 %) tests were obtained from patients designated as immunocompromised. Of all tests obtained, 59 (46.4 %) were deemed clinically relevant. 41 (32.3 %) of tests also led to a change in antimicrobial management for the corresponding patient. No statistically significant association was ascertained between patient-specific factors and clinically relevant test results. Testing in certain clinical scenarios or high-risk settings may be useful, however further studies are needed to assess the cost-benefit of this approach.

Challenges Facing Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in the Endemic Region for Coccidioidomycosis.

Coccidioidomycosis poses a significant cost and morbidity burden in the United States. Additionally, coccidioidomycosis requires constant decision-making related to prevention, diagnosis, and management. Delays in diagnosis lead to significant consequences, including unnecessary diagnostic workup and antibacterial therapy. Antifungal stewardship considerations regarding empiric, prophylactic, and targeted management of coccidioidomycosis are also complex. In this review, the problems facing antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) in the endemic region for coccidioidomycosis, consequences due to delayed or missed diagnoses of coccidioidomycosis on antibacterial prescribing, and excess antifungal prescribing for prevention and treatment of coccidioidomycosis are elucidated. Finally, our recommendations and research priorities for ASPs in the endemic region for coccidioidomycosis are outlined.

The utility of procalcitonin for identifying secondary infections in patients with influenza or COVID-19 receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Background: Identifying secondary infections in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) presents challenges due to the ECMO circuit's influence on traditional signs of infection. Objectives: This study evaluates procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for secondary infections in patients receiving ECMO with influenza or COVID-19 infection. Design: Single-center retrospective cohort study. Methods: All adult patients receiving veno-venous ECMO with underlying influenza or COVID-19 from November 2017 to October 2021 were included. Patient demographics, time receiving ECMO, culture data, and procalcitonin levels were examined. The first procalcitonin within 3 days of infection was compared to negative workups that were collected at least 10 days from the last positive culture. Furthermore, we compared procalcitonin levels by the type of pathogen and site of infection. Results: In this study, 84 patients with influenza or COVID-19 who received ECMO were included. A total of 276 procalcitonin labs were ordered in this cohort, with 33/92 (36%) of the secondary infections having an associated procalcitonin value. When comparing procalcitonin levels, there was no significant difference between the infection and negative workup groups [1 ng/mL (interquartile ranges, IQR: 0.4-1.2) versus 1.3 (0.5-4.3), p = 0.19]. Using 0.5 ng/mL as the cut-off, the sensitivity of procalcitonin was 67% and the specificity was 30%. In our cohort, the positive predictive value of procalcitonin was 14.5% and the negative predictive value was 84%. There was no difference in procalcitonin by type of organism or site of infection. Procalcitonin levels did not routinely decline even after an infection was identified. Conclusion: While procalcitonin is a proposed potential diagnostic marker for secondary infections in patients receiving ECMO, this single-center study demonstrated low sensitivity and specificity of procalcitonin in identifying secondary infections. Furthermore, there was no association of procalcitonin levels with etiology of infection when one was present. Procalcitonin should be used cautiously in identifying infections in veno-venous ECMO.

BACKGROUND: It is very difficult to determine whether patients receiving ECMO have infections as both vital signs and laboratory markers have not shown good utility. Procalcitonin is a laboratory test sometimes used to identify infections, but its test performance is not known in this population. METHODS: We performed a study of adult patient patients receiving ECMO to determine if there were differences in procalcitonin levels when patients had infections as compared to when they did not have infections. We also looked to see if procalcitonin levels routinely dropped after an infection was diagnosed. RESULTS: Procalcitonin values were no different when patients had an infection as compared to when they did not have an infection. Using standard laboratory cut-offs, the procalcitonin sensitivity was 67%, and specificity was 30%. Procalcitonin levels did not routinely decline even after an infection was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin poorly differentiated patients with infections from those without infections and should be used with caution in patients receiving ECMO.

The utility of procalcitonin for identifying secondary infections in patients with influenza or COVID-19 receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Aim: To determine if procalcitonin performs well as a diagnostic marker in identifying additional infections in adult patients receiving ECMO with influenza or COVID-19.

An exception-reporting approach for wound swab culture: effect on post-report antibiotic initiation.

A prior analysis suggested that wound swab culture (WSC) results were driving unnecessary antibiotic use in patients who were not already receiving treatment. As a quality-improvement initiative, our laboratory introduced an "exception-reporting" protocol on 1 March 2023, whereby typical wound pathogens susceptible to recommended empiric therapy (flucloxacillin/cefalexin) were not reported, and a comment was provided, stating no significant resistant organisms had been detected. Full results were available to clinicians on request. Cultures falling outside protocol criteria were reported in the standard fashion. This analysis sought to assess the effect of exception-reporting on post-report antibiotic initiation (PRAI). All community WSC results were matched to antibiotic dispensing records from October 2021 to December 2023. Sampling without treatment pre-report was termed "test and wait" (TaW). Following TaW, PRAI was identified if antibiotics were started within 5 days post-report. There were 1,819 and 764 WSCs received in the pre-change and post-change periods, respectively, where an initial TaW approach had been taken and an organism eligible for exception-reporting had been isolated. In the post-change period, 407 (53.3%) met the criteria and were exception-reported. PRAI occurred in 901 (49.5%) pre-change samples, compared to 102 (25.1%, P < 0.01) with exception-reporting. There was no detectable increase in hospitalization or repeat WSC collection in the 30 days following exception-reporting. Exception-reporting was associated with a markedly reduced proportion of patients being initiated on antibiotics following WSC where an organism had been isolated. The naming of organisms in reports appears to drive unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in many patients. These results require confirmation in other jurisdictions. IMPORTANCE: Wound swab culture is a high-volume test performed in clinical microbiology laboratories. In this analysis, we have shown that an alternative approach to reporting positive wound swab cultures has resulted in a large reduction in post-report antibiotic initiation, suggesting that the current standard method of reporting generates considerable unnecessary antibiotic use. If these findings are replicated elsewhere, wider adoption of this reporting would represent an opportunity for many clinical microbiology laboratories to have a significant impact on community antimicrobial stewardship.

Diagnostic stewardship in infectious diseases: a scoping review.

Introduction. The term 'diagnostic stewardship' is relatively new, with a recent surge in its use within the literature. Despite its increasing popularity, a precise definition remains elusive. Various attempts have been made to define it, with some viewing it as an integral part of antimicrobial stewardship. The World Health Organization offers a broad definition, emphasizing the importance of timely, accurate diagnostics. However, inconsistencies in the use of this term still persist, necessitating further clarification.Gap Statement. There are currently inconsistencies in the definition of diagnostic stewardship used within the academic literature.Aim. This scoping review aims to categorize the use of diagnostic stewardship approaches and define this approach by identifying common characteristics and factors of its use within the literature.Methodology. This scoping review undertook a multi-database search from date of inception until October 2022. Any observational or experimental study where the authors define the intervention to be diagnostic stewardship from any clinical area was included. Screening of all papers was undertaken by a single reviewer with 10% verification by a second reviewer. Data extraction was undertaken by a single reviewer using a pre-piloted form. Given the wide variation in study design and intervention outcomes, a narrative synthesis approach was applied. Studies were clustered around common diagnostic stewardship interventions where appropriate.Results. After duplicate removal, a total of 1310 citations were identified, of which, after full-paper screening, 105 studies were included in this scoping review. The classification of an intervention as taking a diagnostic stewardship approach is a relatively recent development, with the first publication in this field dating back to 2017. The majority of research in this area has been conducted within the USA, with very few studies undertaken outside this region. Visual inspection of the citation map reveals that the current evidence base is interconnected, with frequent references to each other's work. The interventions commonly adopt a restrictive approach, utilizing hard and soft stops within the pre-analytical phase to restrict access to testing. Upon closer examination of the outcomes, it becomes evident that there is a predominant focus on reducing the number of tests rather than enhancing the current test protocol. This is further reflected in the limited number of studies that report on test performance (including protocol improvements, specificity and sensitivity).Conclusion. Diagnostic stewardship seems to have deviated from its intended course, morphing into a rather rudimentary instrument wielded not to enhance but to constrict the scope of testing. Despite the World Health Organization's advocacy for an ideology that promotes a more comprehensive approach to quality improvement, it may be more appropriate to consider alternative regional narratives when categorizing these types of quality improvement interventions.

Rapid Molecular Testing for UTIs: A Diagnostic Stewardship Perspective.

With increased focus on antimicrobial stewardship in post-acute, long-term care (PALTC) settings, optimization of diagnostic testing is essential. Molecular diagnostics are currently being offered and used for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in community and PALTC settings. Yet, no studies to date explore the role of rapid diagnostics such as polymerase chain reaction and other molecular methods in the stewardship efforts of PALTC settings, specifically compared with standard testing with urinalysis and culture with antimicrobial susceptibility testing. This article outlines a framework of diagnostic stewardship to critically evaluate the use of molecular diagnostics for the diagnosis of UTIs in PALTC and the impact on patient outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship. The authors suggest a 5-step process for evaluating the role of novel diagnostics in the PALTC setting. Understanding the shortcomings of newer diagnostic tests may identify needs for further investigation before their widespread use.

Utilization of a Meningitis/Encephalitis PCR panel at the University Hospital Basel - a retrospective study to develop a diagnostic decision rule.

Background: The Biofire® FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) PCR panel covers 14 viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens and has been implemented in many institutions worldwide. Post-marketing studies indicate a reduced sensitivity and overutilization underscoring the need for a more targeted usage. The aim of our study is to describe the utilization of the ME panel and to develop a diagnostic-stewardship based decision rule. Materials: Adult patients, who underwent CSF analysis with the ME panel between August 2016 and June 2021 at the University Hospital Basel, were included. Demographic, clinical, microbiological, and laboratory data were extracted from the electronic health record. Factors associated with a positive ME panel result were identified, and a decision rule was developed to potentially optimize the diagnostic yield and reduce the number of unnecessary tests. Results: 1,236 adult patients received at least one panel in the observed period, of whom 106 panels tested positive (8.6%). The most frequently observed pathogens were Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV, 27%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (19%), Enterovirus (16%), Herpes simplex Virus 1/2 (16%), and Human Herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6, 13%). Fever, vomiting, headache, and photophobia were more frequently present in test positive patients as were significantly higher CSF leukocytes and protein concentrations. When simulating a decision rule based on CSF leukocytes and protein concentration, only 35% of all patients would have qualified for a ME panel tests, thereby increasing the positivity rate to 22.7%. 10 of 106 positive ME panels would have been missed, only involving HHV-6 and VZV (6 and 4 cases, respectively). As these subjects were either severely immunocompromised or had clinical features of shingles we propose extending the testing algorithm by including those criteria. Conclusion: The ME panel positivity rate at our institution was similar as previously published. Our results highlight the need for diagnostic-stewardship interventions when utilizing this assay by implementing a stepwise approach based on a limited number of clinical and laboratory features. This decision rule may improve the pretest probability of a positive test result, increase the quality of test utilization, and reduce costs.

Do all Emergency Room Patients With Influenza-like Symptoms Need Blood Cultures? A Retrospective Cohort Study of 2 Annual Influenza Seasons.

In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated risk factors for bacteremia in emergency department patients presenting with influenza-like symptoms during influenza epidemic seasons. In patients without fever, chronic heart or chronic liver disease, blood culture collection might be omitted.

The Role of Frequent Screening or Diagnostic Testing of Serum Cryptococcal Antigen in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Descriptive Epidemiology.

Background: Cryptococcosis is a notable infectious complication of liver transplantation. Currently, there is no recommendation for screening serum cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) levels in solid organ transplant recipients. We aimed to explore the role of serum CrAg in liver transplant recipients at an institution where posttransplant serum CrAg has been widely tested. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Japan. All liver transplant recipients with serum CrAg measured either for screening or for diagnostic testing at least once after transplantation between April 2005 and March 2022 were included. For participants with either a positive CrAg test result or positive culture for Cryptococcus, we manually reviewed clinical manifestations, management, and prognosis from the medical records. Results: During the study period, 12 885 serum CrAg tests (median, 16 tests per patient) were performed in 468 liver transplant recipients. The 1-year posttransplant incidence of positive serum CrAg test results and culture-proven cryptococcosis was 1.9% (9/468) and 0.6% (3/468), respectively. No patient with persistently negative serum CrAg test results showed growth of Cryptococcus in culture. Four patients had clinical manifestations consistent with cryptococcosis, of whom 2 (50.0%) started antifungal therapy promptly based on a positive serum CrAg test result. In contrast, 5 patients had no clinical manifestations. Three of the 5 (60.0%) patients did not receive antifungal therapy and remained free of clinical manifestations. Conclusions: Serum CrAg test was more sensitive than culture among liver transplant recipients and prompted early diagnosis and antifungal therapy in symptomatic patients. However, serial screening of serum CrAg in asymptomatic patients may be of little value, with the potential for false-positive results.

Clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in fever of undetermined origin.

Background: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a novel diagnostic tool increasingly used in the field of infectious diseases. Little guidance is available regarding its appropriate use in different patient populations and clinical syndromes. We aimed to review the clinical utility of mNGS in patients with a specific clinical syndrome and identify factors that may increase its utility. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts of 72 non-immunocompromised adults hospitalized with the clinical syndrome of 'fever of undetermined origin' and underwent mNGS testing. Standardized criteria from a previously published study were used to determine the clinical impact of mNGS testing. We applied logistic regression to identify factors associated with a positive clinical impact. Results: Of the 72 patients identified, 62.5% were males with a median age of 56. All patients had a fever at the time of evaluation. At least one organism was identified in 65.3% of cases; most commonly were Epstein-Barr virus (13.9%), cytomegalovirus (12.5%), and Rickettsia typhi (11.1%). Of those determined to have an infectious etiology of their febrile syndrome, 89.5% (n = 34/38) had a positive mNGS. Consistency between the organism(s) on mNGS and the clinically determined infectious etiology was 82.4%. mNGS had a positive clinical impact in 40.3% of cases, a negative impact in 2.8%, and no impact in 56.9% of cases. Besides age, we did not identify other factors associated with a higher likelihood of positive clinical impact. Conclusion: In our review, mNGS had a positive clinical impact in a large proportion of adults with fever of undetermined origin, with minimal negative impact. However, mNGS results should be interpreted carefully given the high rate of detection of pathogens of unclear clinical significance. Randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the clinical utility of this novel diagnostic tool.

Clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in fever of undetermined origin In this study, we evaluated the use of a new diagnostic tool, namely, metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS), in hospitalized, non-immunocompromised, adult patients with a fever that was otherwise unexplained. We reviewed the clinical utility of this tool in 72 patients and found that at least one organism was found in 65.3% of cases, with the 2 most common organisms being viruses. In patients who were found to have an infection as the cause of their fever, 89.5% had a positive mNGS study. In 82.4% of cases, the infectious organism(s) found on mNGS was the organism thought to be the cause of the fever. Based on definitions from another study, mNGS had a positive clinical impact in 40.3% of cases, a negative impact in 2.8%, and no impact in 56.9% of cases. This study suggests that mNGS has minimal negative impact and can be a useful tool in identifying a causative infectious organism in patients with unexplained fevers. Additional studies are needed to identify patients and clinical conditions that would most benefit from this tool.