Relationship Between Submental Superficial Layer Hardness and Tongue Pressure Determined Using a Tissue Durometer.

Aging affects the tongue and suprahyoid muscles, causing dysphagia and undernutrition. We hypothesized that tongue function would affect submental superficial layer hardness. Tongue movements during water retention between the tongue and palate are the same as those required during bolus formation, involving internal and external tongue muscle movement. In 28 healthy adults (14 males, 14 females, average age 28.7 ± 2.9 years), we measured the submental superficial layer characteristics (frequency [tension], stiffness, decrement [inverse of resilience], relaxation, and creep [deformation over time]) using a simple tissue durometer (MyotonPRO®), and examined their relationship with maximum voluntary tongue pressure. The tissue durometer sensor was placed in the submental region, where there is no intervening bone. Measurements were performed at rest and while retaining 5 mL water. Tongue pressure was measured using a tongue pressure-measuring device. The submental superficial layer hardness differed significantly between rest and during water retention. During water retention, frequency and stiffness were high, while decrement, relaxation, and creep were low. When pressure is applied to the palate, such as during water retention the inner tongue muscle, which changes the tongue's shape, and the outer tongue muscle, which moves the tongue laterally, are active. However, the change in the hardness of the submental superficial layer during water retention may be related to the suprahyoid muscles that are present in this layer. The results of this study suggested that the hardness of the submental superficial layer changed during water retention, and that tongue movement could be measured from outside the mouth.

Interrater reproducibility of the Myoton and durometer devices to quantify sclerotic chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a severe complication in long-term survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This disease is challenging to manage clinically due to a lack of validated tools to quantitatively measure skin sclerosis. The current gold standard for measuring skin sclerosis is the NIH Skin Score which has only moderate agreement among clinicians and experts. To more accurately assess skin sclerosis in cGVHD, the Myoton and durometer devices can be used to directly measure biomechanical parameters of the skin. However, the reproducibility of these devices is not known in patients with cGVHD. To determine this reproducibility, three observers independently measured 10 anatomic sites in each of seven patients with sclerotic cGVHD using the Myoton and durometer. Clinical reproducibility was measured by mean pairwise differences (U-statistic) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Mean pairwise differences, expressed in true physical units, were used to report typical errors for each anatomic site and device. Mean pairwise differences were less than 11% of the average overall values for all five Myoton parameters and durometer hardness. These were lower for Myoton creep (4.1%), relaxation time (4.7%), and frequency (5.1%) than decrement (9.0%), stiffness (10.4%), and durometer hardness (9.0%). Myoton parameters creep, relaxation time, and frequency showed promise for capturing skin biomechanics more accurately than Myoton stiffness, decrement, or durometer hardness. Mean pairwise differences trended highest in the shin and volar forearm and lowest in the dorsal forearm. The interobserver ICC for overall (averaged across all measured body sites of a patient) creep (0.94; 95% CI 0.87-1.00), relaxation time (0.96; 95% CI 0.90-1.00), and frequency (0.95; 95% CI 0.88-1.00), trended higher than that for decrement (0.43; 95% CI 0.00-0.88), stiffness (0.92; 95% CI 0.81-1.00), and durometer hardness (0.82; 95% CI 0.61-1.00). Similar trends were observed in healthy participants. These findings can help clinicians design better studies to assess therapeutic response to new cGVHD treatments and support the interpretation of future measurements.

Considerations in ureteral stent selection in order to minimize symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: Ureteral stent-related symptoms are common after stent placement. Various characteristics of stent design have been previously investigated to mitigate this issue. Our review summarizes available literature on stent design parameters (diameter, material, position, length, distal loop modifications) and their effect on stent-related symptoms, including pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified articles from PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Grey Literature using a search strategy employing MESH search headings (i.e, ureteral stent diameter, length, composition, material, durometer, and stent-related pain). RESULTS: Out of 2,970 identified studies, 26 met eligibility criteria. Most diameter studies found patients with > 6Fr stents reported significantly increased stent-related symptoms. A few did report more migration with thinner stents. Almost half of durometer studies found composition made no difference in symptoms. Distal loop modification studies found minimizing intravesical material decreased stent-related pain. All studies on positioning found patients reported more severe urinary, pain and quality of life symptoms when stents crossed the bladder midline. No difference in stent-related symptoms was seen between multi-length and standard stents patients. CONCLUSION: Adverse symptoms occur commonly after ureteral stent placement. No definitive recommendations on the model stent can be provided due to the heterogeneity of studies. Though the number of robust studies is limited, data suggest stents crossing midline, larger diameters, and those without distal material-reduction modifications may worsen stent-related symptoms. Future studies are needed to better understand the ideal stent design.

Baseline incision characteristics and early scar maturation indices following cardiac device implantation.

AIMS: Dermatologic evaluation for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has not been established. We sought to ascertain baseline wound scar features using quantifiable surgical tools and scar scales on post-CIED patients. METHODS: A single-center, prospective observational case-control study was performed where 92 study subjects (40 healthy volunteers and 52 post-CIED patients) completed the study. Durometer was used to quantify skin pliability before CIED placement, postprocedure, and 2 weeks postprocedure. Higher durometer readings signified reduced skin pliability. Durometer readings were compared to the patients' contralateral pectoral skin and to a healthy volunteer's cohort skin within the prepectoral region. Patient wounds were observed and graded using the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Manchester Scar Scale (MSS). RESULTS: Baseline pectoral skin pliability readings were similar in healthy volunteers and CIED patient population. In comparison to preprocedural measurements, surgical site skin pliability decreased in postprocedural and 2 weeks follow-up time points (P-value .004 and <.001, respectively). The increases in durometer readings were higher in the older population (age >75 over time, P = .008). POSAS evaluations showed on average a thin painless hypopigmented scar with moderate stiffness. MSS scar evaluation showed a palpable scar with slight contour differences and color mismatch and appeared to be slightly better in the African American population. There was no difference in scar characteristics with preprocedural use of antiplatelet or anticoagulation or staple closure or gender. CONCLUSIONS: Serial measurements could be of value for development of new strategies for cosmesis and improved wound healing.

Model for liver hardness using two-dimensional shear wave elastography, durometer, and preoperative biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) increases morbidity and mortality after liver resection for patients with advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Preoperative liver stiffness using two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) is widely used to evaluate the degree of fibrosis. However, the 2D-SWE results were not accurate. A durometer measures hardness by quantifying the ability of a material to locally resist the intrusion of hard objects into its surface. However, the durometer score can only be obtained during surgery. AIM: To measure correlations among 2D-SWE, palpation by surgeons, and durometer-measured objective liver hardness and to construct a liver hardness regression model. METHODS: We enrolled 74 hepatectomy patients with liver hardness in a derivation cohort. Tactile-based liver hardness scores (0-100) were determined through palpation of the liver tissue by surgeons. Additionally, liver hardness was measured using a durometer. Correlation coefficients for durometer-measured hardness and preoperative parameters were calculated. Multiple linear regression models were constructed to select the best predictive durometer scale. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to calculate the best model's prediction of PHLF and risk factors for PHLF, respectively. A separate validation cohort (n = 162) was used to evaluate the model. RESULTS: The stiffness measured using 2D-SWE and palpation scale had good linear correlation with durometer-measured hardness (Pearson rank correlation coefficient 0.704 and 0.729, respectively, P < 0.001). The best model for the durometer scale (hardness scale model) was based on stiffness, hepatitis B virus surface antigen, and albumin level and had an R 2 value of 0.580. The area under the ROC for the durometer and hardness scale for PHLF prediction were 0.807 (P = 0.002) and 0.785 (P = 0.005), respectively. The optimal cutoff value of the durometer and hardness scale was 27.38 (sensitivity = 0.900, specificity = 0.660) and 27.87 (sensitivity = 0.700, specificity = 0.787), respectively. Patients with a hardness scale score of > 27.87 were at a significantly higher risk of PHLF with hazard ratios of 7.835 (P = 0.015). The model's PHLF predictive ability was confirmed in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: Liver stiffness assessed by 2D-SWE and palpation correlated well with durometer hardness values. The multiple linear regression model predicted durometer hardness values and PHLF.

Durometry in SSc: The hard facts. A systematic literature review and additional pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the reliability of durometry in systemic sclerosis (SSc), by means of a systematic review and additional pilot study. METHODS: Literature was systematically reviewed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify all original studies assessing the reliability of durometry in SSc. Additionally, in the pilot study, intra-rater reliability was evaluated in a first cohort of 74 SSc patients (61 female, 13 LSSc/53 LcSSc/8 DcSSc). In a second separate set of 30 SSc patients (21 female, 4 LSSc/20 LcSSc/6 DcSSc), intra- and inter-rater reliability were evaluated. RESULTS: Only two unique records identified through the systematic review were qualified to generate conclusions. Regarding intra-rater reliability, Kissin reported excellent intra-class correlation coefficient values (ICC, 0.86-0.94) for measurements at nine skin sites in two DcSSc patients. Merkel and Kissin described, both in five DcSSc patients, good to excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC, 0.82-0.96 and 0.61-0.85) for measurements at respectively, six and nine skin sites. In our pilot study, ICC for intra-rater reliability at 17 standardized skin sites were excellent in both cohorts, ranging 0.93-0.99 and 0.78-0.98, respectively. ICC for inter-rater reliability at 17 standardized skin sites were good to excellent 0.63-0.93, except for the feet (0.48 and 0.52). CONCLUSION: The preliminary findings in the literature are supported by our pilot study in which we have attested the reliability of durometry in SSc patients. However, prior to including durometry as an (additional) outcome measure in SSc clinical trials, its validation status in the assessment of skin fibrosis needs to be completely attested.

Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Denture Cleansers on Surface Hardness of Permanent Silicone Denture Liners - An In vitro Study.

AIM: This study aimed to determine the effect of three commercially available denture cleansers on surface hardness of two different silicone denture liners at various time intervals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 cylindrical specimens of permanent silicone-based soft liners were prepared from a custom made metal mold with dimensions of 15 mm × 10 mm, of which 60 specimens were fabricated using Voco™ and the remaining 60 specimens with Molossil™ permanent denture liners. All specimens were divided into four major groups based on cleansing treatments, comprising 30 specimens each. And then, all cleansers dissolved in 250 mL water as recommended by the manufacturer. Specimens of the first group were cleansed daily by rinsing with water and second group with Periogard™ denture cleansing solution and third group with Secure™ denture cleansing solution and the fourth group with Polident™ denture cleansing solution. Specimens of all groups were tested on 1st week, 1st month, and 6th month time interval using a Shore A Durometer. Three readings were noted for each sample and the mean of those readings was taken. RESULTS: Surface hardness of all the samples was significantly higher after a period of 6 months irrespective of the cleansing treatment. Statistically significant changes were observed between Polident™, Secure™, and Periogard™ denture cleanser groups over control with time. Minor changes were observed in surface hardness of Voco™ denture liners as compared to Molossil™ soft liners for all groups, as time progressed. CONCLUSION: Voco™ soft denture lining material can be performed significantly better than Mollosil™ soft denture lining material in all cleansing treatments and Polident™ denture cleanser has the least effect on surface hardness of soft liners than Periogard™ and Secure™ denture cleansing agents.

Predicting the consistency of intracranial meningiomas using apparent diffusion coefficient maps derived from preoperative diffusion-weighted imaging.

OBJECTIVE: The consistency of meningiomas is a critical factor affecting the difficulty of resection, operative complications, and operative time. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and is calculated using two optimized b values. While the results of comparisons between the standard ADC and the consistency of meningiomas vary, the shifted ADC has been reported to be strongly correlated with liver stiffness. The purpose of the present prospective cohort study was to determine whether preoperative standard and shifted ADC maps predict the consistency of intracranial meningiomas. METHODS: Standard (b values 0 and 1000 sec/mm2) and shifted (b values 200 and 1500 sec/mm2) ADC maps were calculated using preoperative DWI in patients undergoing resection of intracranial meningiomas. Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed within the tumor on standard and shifted ADC maps and registered on the navigation system. Tumor tissue located at the registered ROI was resected through craniotomy, and its stiffness was measured using a durometer. The cutoff point lying closest to the upper left corner of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was determined for the detection of tumor stiffness such that an ultrasonic aspirator or scissors was always required for resection. Each tumor tissue sample with stiffness greater than or equal to or less than this cutoff point was defined as hard or soft tumor, respectively. RESULTS: For 76 ROIs obtained from 25 patients studied, significant negative correlations were observed between stiffness and the standard ADC (ρ = -0.465, p < 0.01) and the shifted ADC (ρ = -0.490, p < 0.01). The area under the ROC curve for detecting hard tumor (stiffness ≥ 20.8 kPa) did not differ between the standard ADC (0.820) and the shifted ADC (0.847) (p = 0.39). The positive predictive value (PPV) for the combination of a low standard ADC and a low shifted ADC for detecting hard tumor was 89%. The PPV for the combination of a high standard ADC and a high shifted ADC for detecting soft tumor (stiffness < 20.8 kPa) was 81%. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of standard and shifted ADC maps derived from preoperative DWI can be used to predict the consistency of intracranial meningiomas.

Durometry as an alternative tool to the modified Rodnan's skin score in the assessment of diffuse systemic sclerosis patients: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The reproducibility and reliability of the modified Rodnan's Skin Score (mRSS) are debated due to investigator-related subjectivity. Here, we evaluate if durometry correlates with mRSS in patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2018 to June 2019, including 58 diffuse SSc patients. Two certified researchers, blind to each other's scores, performed the mRSS, followed by durometry at 17 predefined skin sites. For durometry and mRSS, individual scores per skin site were registered. Durometry and mRSS results measured by each researcher, as well as scores from different researchers, were compared. Skin thickness measurements from forearm skin biopsies were available in a subset of the patients, for comparisons. Statistical analyses included Cohen's Kappa Coefficient, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Kendall's Coefficient and Spearman's test. RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation, SD) patient age was 44.8 (12.9) years, and 88% were female. Inter-rater agreement varied from 0.88 to 0.99 (Intraclass correlation coefficient) for durometry, and 0.54 to 0.79 (Cohen's Kappa coefficient) for mRSS, according to the specific evaluated sites. When data were compared with skin thickness assessed in forearm biopsies, durometry correlated better with skin thickness than mRSS. CONCLUSION: Durometry may be considered as an alternative method to quantify skin involvement in patients with diffuse SSc. The strong inter-rater agreement suggests that the method may be useful for the assessment of patients by multiple researchers, as in clinical trials.

Durometry as an alternative tool to the modified Rodnans skin score in the assessment of diffuse systemic sclerosis patients: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Background The reproducibility and reliability of the modified Rodnan's Skin Score (mRSS) are debated due to investigator-related subjectivity. Here, we evaluate if durometry correlates with mRSS in patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2018 to June 2019, including 58 diffuse SSc patients. Two certified researchers, blind to each other's scores, performed the mRSS, followed by durometry at 17 predefined skin sites. For durometry and mRSS, individual scores per skin site were registered. Durometry and mRSS results measured by each researcher, as well as scores from different researchers, were compared. Skin thickness measurements from forearm skin biopsies were available in a subset of the patients, for comparisons. Statistical analyses included Cohen's Kappa Coefficient, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Kendall's Coefficient and Spearman's test. Results Mean (standard deviation, SD) patient age was 44.8 (12.9) years, and 88% were female. Inter-rater agreement varied from 0.88 to 0.99 (Intraclass correlation coefficient) for durometry, and 0.54 to 0.79 (Cohen's Kappa coefficient) for mRSS, according to the specific evaluated sites. When data were compared with skin thickness assessed in forearm biopsies, durometry correlated better with skin thickness than mRSS. Conclusion Durometry may be considered as an alternative method to quantify skin involvement in patients with diffuse SSc. The strong inter-rater agreement suggests that the method may be useful for the assessment of patients by multiple researchers, as in clinical trials.(AU)

Reproducibility of the durometer and myoton devices for skin stiffness measurement in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Clinical assessment of skin stiffness is unreliable in many applications. The durometer, an industrial device to measure hardness, has previously been applied in scleroderma. The Myoton is a noninvasive handheld device for assessing soft tissue biomechanical parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the reproducibility of both devices in six healthy subjects in the volar forearm, dorsal forearm, upper arm, shin, and calf bilaterally. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used as a measure of reproducibility among three observers. RESULTS: The interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of overall stiffness for the Myoton was 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-1.00] and 0.71 [0.39-1.00] for the durometer. Coefficient of variation (CV) for the Myoton was 6.4% [range 1.3-12.1] and 7.6% [range 4.4-13.8] for the durometer. Myoton and durometer values had a Pearson correlation of 0.69. The intraobserver Myoton ICC was 0.89 [0.74-1.00] and CV 3.1% [range 1.6-5.0]. The 95% confidence minimal detectable change by the Myoton for a single observer is 32.4 N/m, which is 7.6% of the average subject's overall stiffness. CONCLUSION: The Myoton demonstrated high reproducibility, particularly in the overall stiffness parameter, and merits further investigation to assess disease progression and treatment efficacy.

Scalp simulation - A novel approach to site-specific biomechanical modeling of the skin.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the hardness of the human scalp in vivo in order to identify an appropriate scalp simulant, from a range of commercially available silicone materials, for force impact assessment. Site-dependent variation in scalp hardness, and the applicability of contemporary skin simulants to the scalp were also considered. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Shore A-type durometer was used to collected hardness data from the scalps of 30 human participants (five males and five females in each of the three age categories: 18-30, 31-40, 41-50) and four commercially available silicones (light, medium, and heavy-bodied PVS, and duplication silicone). One-sample t-tests were used to compare the mean hardness of simulants to that of the scalp. Site-dependent variation in the hardness of the scalp was assessed using a mixed-model repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Mean human scalp hardness derived from participants was 20.6 Durometer Units (DU; SD = 3.4). Analysis revealed only the medium-bodied PVS to be an acceptable scalp simulant when compared to the mean hardness of the human scalp (p = 0.869). Scalp hardness varied significantly anteroposteriorly (with an observable linear trend, p < 0.001), but not mediolaterally (p = 0.271). Comparisons of simulants to site-specific variation in scalp hardness anteroposteriorly found the medium-bodied PVS to be only suitable in the central region of the scalp (p = 0.391). In contrast, the duplication silicone (p = 0.074) and light-bodied PVS (p = 0.147) were only comparable to the posterior region. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary skin simulants fail to accurately represent the scalp in terms of hardness. There is strong support for the use of medium-bodied PVS as a scalp simulant. Human scalp hardness varies significantly anteroposteriorly, but not mediolaterally, corresponding to regional anatomical variation within the scalp. A number of materials were identified as potential simulants for different regions of the scalp when more site-specific simulant research is required.

Bioerosive and bioprotective role of barnacles on rocky shores.

Bioerosion and bioprotection (bio-remodeling) is the action exerted by biota colonizing rocky shores. It represents an important component among processes responsible for shaping coastal landforms, and a clear evidence of interaction between the biosphere and the solid earth. Barnacles extensively colonize the midlittoral belt of rocky shores in the Mediterranean Basin. Previous research, mostly based on laboratory evidence, suggests that barnacles are bioprotectors, in that they protect the rock surface from different types of physical and chemical weathering. In this paper, we present the results of a field experiment carried out at different spatial scales at two study areas along the moderately energetic and microtidal coast of NW Italy. Barnacles were removed from the sandstone bedrock in replicated plots (manipulated plots) arranged according to a hierarchical spatial design. After four months rock hardness was tested on each plot with both Schmidt hammer and Equotip Piccolo devices, as well as on a corresponding number of control plots. Data were processed by means of a multifactorial analysis of variance (ANOVA). In control plots, rock hardness tested with Schmidt hammer exceeded that measured in previously manipulated plots. Testing with Equotip yielded the opposite results. This experimental evidence confirmed that barnacles play a bio-protective role in the midlittoral at sub-surficial level, while adding the key aspect that this effect is generalizable to spatial scales ranging from a few centimeters up to tens of kilometers. In addition, our results showed, for the first time, that at surface level they can simultaneously act as bioeroders, likely causing corrosion of the rock surface by fostering dissolution of the sandstone carbonate matrix.

Objective assessment of reconstructed breast hardness using a durometer.

BACKGROUND: Whether a durometer was suitable for objectively measuring reconstructed breast hardness was evaluated. METHODS: Subjects were 81 women who underwent expander-implant reconstructions following breast cancer ablation. Capsular contracture was evaluated with Baker grading. Capsular thickness was measured with T1-weighted MRI at the upper areola area. The durometer was placed on the upper areola. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to compare variables. RESULTS: On Baker grading, 17 breasts were Baker grade I, 52 breasts were Baker grade II, 11 breasts were Baker grade III, and 1 breast was Baker grade IV. Mean capsular thickness on MRI was 1.1 (SD 0.4) mm with Baker grade I, 1.2 (SD 0.3) mm with Baker grade II, 1.4 (SD 0.4) mm with Baker grade III, and 1.9 mm with Baker grade IV. Mean durometer value was 0 with Baker grade I, 0.2 (SD 0.5) with Baker grade II, 2.0 (SD 1.7), with Baker grade III, and 8 with Baker grade IV. Baker grade IV was excluded from analysis because there was only one case. When Baker grade III was defined as positive for hardness, multiple logistic regression analysis showed that durometer value was associated with Baker grade III (p = 0.0005), but capsular thickness was not. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the durometer value for Baker grade III, the optimal cutoff value was 0.5 (sensitivity 0.92, 1-specificity 0.17, area under the curve 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: The durometer offers an objective index of hardness that might replace the subjective Baker grading. Further studies are needed to confirm the utility of this index.

A Three Month Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Surface Treatment Agents on the Surface Integrity and Softness of Acrylic based Soft Liner: An In vivo Study.

INTRODUCTION: Acrylic based soft liners are cost effective, yet are inferior in durability as compared to silicone based liners. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate if the softness and surface integrity of acrylic based soft liner can be maintained by using different surface treatment agents. AIM: To comparatively evaluate the effects of Varnish, Monopoly and Kregard surface treatment agents on the surface integrity and softness of acrylic based soft liner at baseline, at one month and after three months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 37 participants who required conventional maxillary dentures were selected according to the determined inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. In the maxillary denture on the denture bearing surface, eight palatal recesses (5 mm x 3 mm) were made and filled with acrylic based soft liner (Permasoft). The soft liners in these recesses were given surface treatment and divided as control (uncoated), Varnish, Monopoly and Kregard groups. The hardness and surface integrity were evaluated with Shore A Durometer and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) respectively at baseline, one month and three months interval. Surface integrity between groups was compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. Intergroup comparison for hardness was done using ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post-hoc tests. RESULTS: Amongst all the groups tested, surface integrity was maintained in the Kregard group, as compared to control, Varnish and Monopoly groups for all three time intervals (p< 0.001). Kregard treated samples also demonstrated significantly higher softness at all the time intervals (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Surface treatment with Kregard demonstrated better surface integrity and softness at all the time intervals.

CAN RUNNERS PERCEIVE CHANGES IN HEEL CUSHIONING AS THE SHOE AGES WITH INCREASED MILEAGE?

BACKGROUND: For those runners who utilize footwear and have a rearfoot strike pattern, the durability of the midsole heel region has been shown to deteriorate as shoe mileage increases. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was threefold: 1) to determine if the runner can self-report changes in heel cushioning properties of the midsole after an extended period of distance running, 2) to determine if force and plantar pressures measured in the heel region of the midsole using a capacitance sensor insole change after running 640 km, and 3) to determine if a durometer could be used clinically to objectively measure changes in the hardness of the material in the heel region of the midsole. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional Study. METHODS: Fifteen recreational runners voluntarily consented to participate and were provided with a new pair of running shoes. Each participant's running style was observed and classified as having a rearfoot strike pattern. Inclusion criteria included running at least 24 km per week, experience running on a treadmill, no history of lower extremity congenital or traumatic deformity, or acute injury six months prior to the start of the study. The ability of each participant to self-perceive changes in shoe cushioning, comfort and fit was assessed using the Footwear Comfort Assessment Tool (FCAT). In-shoe plantar pressures and vertical forces were assessed using a capacitance sensor insole while runners ran over a 42-meter indoor runway. A Shore A durometer was used to measure the hardness of the midsole in the heel region. All measures were completed at baseline (zero km) and after running 160, 320, 480, and 640 km. In addition to descriptive statistics, a repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine if the FCAT, pressures, forces, or midsole hardness changed because of increased running mileage. RESULT: While plantar pressures and vertical forces were significantly reduced in the midsole heel region, none of the runners self-reported a significant reduction in heel cushioning based on FCAT scores after running 640 km. The use of a durometer provided an objective measure of the changes in the heel region of the midsole that closely matched the reductions observed in pressure and force values. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that runners who have a rearfoot strike pattern will have a 16% to 33% reduction in the amount of cushioning in the heel region of the midsole after running 480 km. Although there were significant reductions in heel cushioning, the experienced recreational runners in this study were not able to self-perceive these changes after running 640 km. In addition, the use of a durometer provides a quick and accurate way to assess changes in the hardness of the heel region of the midsole as running mileage increases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3, Controlled laboratory study.

Autologous fat graft as treatment of post short stature surgical correction scars.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical limb lengthening is undertaken to correct pathological short stature. Among the possible complications related to this procedure, painful and retractile scars are a cause for both functional and cosmetic concern. Our team has already shown the efficacy of autologous fat grafting in the treatment of scars with varying aetiology, so we decided to apply this technique to scars related to surgical correction of dwarfism. A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of autologous fat grafting in the treatment of post-surgical scars in patients with short-limb dwarfism using durometer measurements and a modified patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS), to which was added a parameter to evaluate movement impairment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2009 and September 2012, 36 children (28 female and 8 male) who presented retractile and painful post-surgical scars came to our unit and were treated with autologous fat grafting. Preoperative and postoperative mean durometer measurements were analysed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and POSAS parameters were studied using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in all durometer measurements (p-value <0.05) and in all but one of the POSAS parameters (p-value <0.05) following treatment with autologous fat grafting. DISCUSSION: Surgical procedures to camouflage scars on lower limbs are not often used as a first approach and non-surgical treatments often lead to unsatisfactory results. In contrast, our autologous fat grafting technique in the treatment of post-surgical scars has been shown to be a valuable option in patients with short-limb dwarfism. CONCLUSION: There was a reduction of skin hardness and a clinical improvement of all POSAS parameters in all patients treated. Moreover, the newly introduced POSAS parameter appears to be reliable and we recommend that it is included to give a more complete evaluation of patient perception.

Effects of intra-arterial octreotide on pancreatic texture: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Octreotide is suggested to harden the pancreas, thus facilitating the construction of a pancreatic anastomosis and lowering the risk of postoperative fistula. We tested the hypothesis that intra-arterial application of octreotide in the gastroduodenal artery during pancreatectomy may increase pancreatic hardness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with parallel assignment was conducted. Patients planned for a pancreatoduodenectomy or a total pancreatectomy, who had a palpatory and durometer proven (<40 Shore units) soft pancreas, were assigned to receive intraoperatively either 5 mL 500µg octreotide or 5 mL 0.9% saline solution as a bolus injection in the gastroduodenal artery. Pancreatic hardness was measured before, early, and late after intervention. The investigator performing the durometer measurements and pathologist were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was increased pancreatic hardness. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (ID NCT01400100). RESULTS: A total of 12 patients received octreotide and 13 received saline solution. Pancreatic hardness marginally increased in the octreotide group: 0.67 ± 2.3 Shore units, whereas it decreased in the control group: -2.15 ± 2.7 Shore units. The difference was statistically significant, p = 0.029 (95% confidence interval = -4.87 to -0.77). Histology did not find any correlate for this clinically irrelevant hardening effect. CONCLUSIONS: A single bolus application of octreotide did not deliver a clinically relevant increase in pancreatic hardness. Future studies on the hardening effect of octreotide should employ repeated or continuous preoperative administration of this drug.

Quantitative assessment and determinants of suture-holding capacity of human pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Hard pancreas is welcome by surgeons performing resective pancreatic surgery, because it is believed to offer better suture holding capacity (SHC), thus decreasing the risk for a postoperative leak. However, neither the actual SHC of pancreatic tissue in humans nor its determinants have been studied. METHODS: We directly measured SHC for polydioxanone 5-0 suture and tissue hardness at the pancreatic isthmus in 53 human pancreata using a dynamometer and a durometer. A histologic score based on fibrosis grade, fat content, pancreatic duct size, and signs of chronic pancreatitis was calculated for every sample. We tested the hypothesis that SHC of the pancreas was proportional to tissue hardness, and evaluated the role of different possible histomorphologic determinants of SHC. RESULTS: Suture-holding capacity correlated perfectly with tissue hardness (r = 0.98; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.99). The histologic score showed a stronger correlation with both parameters than any single histologic parameter. The SHC of transductal sutures was significantly higher than that of pure transparenchymal sutures. The SHC and hardness were significantly lower in patients who developed a clinically relevant pancreatic fistula postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: A mixture of histomorphologic features of human pancreas determines its tissue hardness and SHC. Involvement of the main pancreatic duct in the suture line appears to increase the mechanical strength of the pancreatic anastomosis.

Effect of age on the biomechanical and microcirculatory properties of the skin in healthy individuals and during venous ulceration.

BACKGROUND: With aging there is alteration of elastic properties of the skin and skin-blood flow. AIM: The purpose of this study was to compare age-related changes in selected biomechanical parameters of the skin (skin hardness, skin extensibility, relaxation time constant, τ) and subcutaneous microcirculatory quality (SMQ) in individuals with and without venous diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TWO GROUPS WERE STUDIED: the first group was of asymptomatic healthy individuals and the second group included patients with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and venous ulceration, without edema. Both groups were subdivided to three age categories (21-40, 41-60 and 61-90 years old). Skin hardness was measured by durometer, extensibility and τ were measured using extensometer and SQM was assessed via postural vasoconstrictive response (LDF). RESULTS: Results showed that skin hardness, extensibility, and τ-values were increased, whereas LDF was decreased in the older groups as compared with younger groups. These changes are attributed to alterations in the skin structure and reduced capillaries density networks. Similar behavior was found in the biomechanical and microcirculatory changes in patients with venous ulceration and CVI, but these changes were more increased further in older patients with venous ulceration as compared with older patients with CVI and that can be attribute to more intense response against tissue injury. CONCLUSIONS: Since aging elevated skin hardness and extensibility, but lowered vasoconstrictive response in individuals, with and without, venous diseases, we conclude that aging process is likely to cause an accumulation of damaged skin tissues and that could induce an apparent antigen-driven response that altered skin structure and the subsequent biomechanical properties obtained in this study.