Underrepresented Applicants Post-USMLE Pass/Fail: A National Survey of Competitive Residency Directors.

Objective: To report the selection criteria important to residency program directors (PDs) and whether they believe pass/fail scoring will impact underrepresented in medicine (URM), International Medical Graduate (IMG), or osteopathic (DO) residency applicants after the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) changed Step 1 score reporting to pass/fail in January 2022. Methods: A Qualtrics survey was sent between August 2022 and January 2023 to 1141 US PDs from specialties with traditionally low residency selection rates: dermatology, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, interventional radiology, diagnostic radiology, radiation oncology, thoracic surgery, vascular surgery, plastic surgery, and urology. Contact information was obtained from AMA, FRIEDA, or program websites. Results: We received 433 responses (38%). When asked to anticipate the difficulty student groups will face matching into their specialty, PDs reported: for URM, 24.0% increased, 46.0% unchanged, and 30.0% decreased; for DO, 49.19% increased, 44.58% unchanged, and 6.23% decreased and for IMG, 56.35% increased, 39.72% unchanged, and 3.93% decreased. When asked to rank the most important selection factors, the top two responses were Step 2 CK score and away rotation participation at their site. Conclusion: PDs overwhelmingly believed residency selection difficulty would either increase or remain unchanged for DO (93.77%) and IMG (96.07%). In contrast, 76.0% reported difficulty for URM students would either decrease or remain unchanged. PDs ranked Step 2 CK score and away rotation participation as the most important selection factors. Despite PDs' belief that the Step 1 pass/fail scoring system may mitigate one barrier for URM students, emphasis on Step 2 CK and away rotations place additional barriers.

The Impact of United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Transitioning To Pass/Fail on Medical Student Perception of Research Needed to Match Into One's Preferred Specialty.

Purpose To evaluate how the transition of United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 to a pass/fail scoring influenced medical student perceptions of the importance of research required to match into their preferred residency specialty. Methods A 14-item survey was distributed by e-mail to medical students at one medical school in the southeastern United States in November of 2021. Responses were compared between medical students taking USMLE Step 1 pass/fail in the future and medical students taking USMLE Step 1 for a three-digit score. Results A total of 168 medical students responded to the survey with 98 respondents who planned on taking USMLE Step 1 pass/fail (45 first-year medical students (MS1) and 53 MS2) and 70 respondents who took USMLE Step 1 for a numerical score (37 MS3 and 33 MS4). There were no differences in how each cohort scored the level of importance of research in matching into their preferred residency specialty (p=0.10); however, those taking USMLE Step 1 pass/fail believe an average of 4.6 research experiences are necessary to match into their preferred residency, compared to only 3.4 research experiences for those who took it for a numerical score (p=0.04). Conclusion No statistically significant difference in the perceived importance of research in matching into one's preferred residency specialty was found between cohorts. However, the pass/fail cohort believes they will need more research experiences to match their chosen specialty than the numerical score cohort. Results could indicate that students participate in more research and extracurricular activities to be more competitive for residency applications.

Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Who Failed Screening for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) has recently emerged as a promising alternative to surgery for tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, a significant proportion of patients fail screening for TTVI, and little is known about their characteristics and natural history. This study sought to investigate causes of screen failure and outcomes of patients declined for TTVI. This was a retrospective single-center study of 32 patients who were ineligible for participation in transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement and tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair trials. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to the therapy they received: optimized medical therapy (OMT) group or intervention group. The mean age was 82 ± 7.8 years and 68.8% were women. The most common reasons for TTVI exclusion were anatomic/procedural impediment (53.1%), inclusion criteria not met (40.6%), and multivalvular disease (6.3%). Overall, 19 patients (59.4%) did not undergo subsequent tricuspid intervention. The clinical outcomes of these patients who received OMT alone were poor, with a 1-year composite of cardiac death or heart failure readmission of 47.4%. These rates were worse than in patients who subsequently underwent an intervention, albeit not statistically significant (OMT: 47.7% vs 23.1% interventions, p = 0.3), and were significantly more pronounced in the subgroup of patients who were excluded for anatomic/procedural limitations (OMT: 70% vs 14.3% interventions, p = 0.05). In conclusion, patients ineligible for TTVI, particularly, those with anatomic/procedural limitations, and treated medically have poor outcomes. These data underscore the importance of earlier referral and support the need for further transcatheter therapy iterations.

Porous structures inspired by porcupine quill: multiscale design optimization approach.

This paper presents a novel approach for designing a freeform bending-resistant structure from the combination of explicit discrete component-based topology optimization (TO) and the porcupine quill-inspired features. To embed the porcupine quill's features into the TO formulations, the method involves constructing discrete components at various scales to imitate features including solid shell, stochastically distributed pores, and graded stiffeners. The components are iteratively updated, and the optimization process allows for the grading of quill-inspired features while achieving optimal structural compliance under bending loads. The proposed approach is demonstrated to be effective through the resolution of Messershmitt-Bolkow-Blohm (MBB) beam designs, parameterized studies of geometric parameters, and numerical validation of long-span and short-span quill-inspired beam designs. By examining the von Mises stress distribution, the study highlights the mitigation of material yielding at the shell region brought by the geometric features of porcupine quills, leading to the potential theory support for the bending resistance. The optimized MBB beams are manufactured using the material extrusion technique, and three-point bending tests are conducted to explore the failure mitigation capability of the quill-inspired beam under large deformation. Consequently, the study concludes that the proposed quill-inspired component-based TO approach can design a structure with excellent bending resistance according to the improved energy absorption as well as increased deformation after reaching 75% peak load.

Trends in the Main Residency Match From 2007 to 2020.

Background The United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 was recently changed from a numerically scored grading system to a pass/fail grading system. Until late 2024, there will be no formal studies about the impact that the grading change will have on the match process. To thoroughly assess the impact that this change will have on the overall match process, it is important to look at what the trends in applicants' objective measures have been in the years before the change. We aim to systematically evaluate the rates of change and mean trend of objective metrics found in residency applications in the main residency match.  Methods Objective medical student data of matched and unmatched applicants were queried from the National Matching Program's Charting Outcomes in the Match Reports for the 2007 to 2020 application cycles. Data were used to create linear regression analyses and statistical tests were performed to evaluate trends over time. Results For matched applicants, there were statistically significant positive trends for the mean number of contiguous ranks (m=0.33, p<0.01), having another non-doctoral graduate degree (m=0.67, p<0.01), membership to Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) honor society (m=0.22, p<0.01), mean USMLE Step 1 score (m=1.01, p<0.01), mean USMLE Step 2 score (m=1.68, p<0.01), mean number of research experiences (m=0.12, p<0.01), and mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications (m=0.34, p<0.01). Additionally, there was a statistically significant negative trend for the percentage who graduated from a top 40 National Institutes of Health-funded medical school (m=-0.41, p<0.01). For unmatched applicants, there were statistically significant positive trends for having another non-doctoral graduate degree (m=0.83, p<0.01), mean USMLE Step 1 score (m=1.26, p<0.01), mean USMLE Step 2 score (m=2.27, p<0.01), mean number of research experiences (m=0.13, p<0.01), and mean number of abstracts, presentations, and publications (m=0.33, p<0.01). Conclusion Our study shows that there have been statistically significant increases in almost all objective measures in the residency application. Recent changes to the abstracts, presentations, and publications on the Step 1 scoring system will force almost all residency programs to overhaul their application process and potentially increase reliance on Step 2, research, and other nonobjective factors. For students early in their medical education, emphasis on Step 2 and research will yield increased chances of matching into residency in the future.

Perceptions and Expectations Regarding the Step 1 Score Change Among Surgical and Non-Surgical Program Directors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

There are currently no studies examining differences in perceptions and expected impact of the Step 1 score change to pass/fail between surgical and non-surgical program directors (PDs). We conducted a systematic review in May 2023 of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PSYCInfo to evaluate studies examining PDs' perspectives regarding the Step 1 score change. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to determine differences in perspectives among surgical and non-surgical PDs. Surgical PDs (76.8% [95% CI, 72.1%-82.0%], I2 = 52%) reported significantly greater rates of disagreement with the score change compared to non-surgical (65.1% [95% CI, 57.9%-73.1%], I2 = 69.7%) (P = .01). Surgical PDs also reported significantly greater rates of agreement that the score change will increase the difficulty in objectively comparing applicants (88.1% [95% CI, 84.6%-91.7%], I2 = 16.4%), compared to non-surgical (81.0% [95% CI, 75.6%-86.8%], I2 = 72.6%) (P = .04). There was less heterogeneity among non-surgical PDs (88.7% [95% CI, 86.2%-91.2%], I2 = 0%), compared to surgical (84.7% [95% CI, 79.0%-90.8%], I2 = 67.3%), regarding expected increases in emphasis on Step 2, although the difference in rates of agreement was not statistically significant. Overall, there is significant heterogeneity in the literature regarding expected changes in the residency application review process. Most PDs reported significant disagreement with the score change, greater expected difficulty in objectively evaluating applicants, and greater emphasis on Step 2, with surgical PDs reporting greater rates of disagreement, greater expected difficulty, and heterogeneity regarding expected increases in emphasis on Step 2, compared to non-surgical. Additionally, there is significant heterogeneity in the overall literature regarding expected changes in the residency application review process. Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines that improve the overall residency application process for all stakeholders.

Transitioning From Points-Based Grading to a Modified Pass/Fail Grading Approach in a Simulated Patient Program.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of transitioning from points-based grading to a modified pass/fail grading approach in a simulated patient (SP) program on first year pharmacy (P1) student performance in a PharmD curriculum. METHODS: Course-level data from the 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 academic years were collected to assess the impact of transitioning to a modified pass/fail grading approach on P1 student performance. During the 2021-2022 academic year, points-based grading was used. In 2022-2023, a modified pass/fail grading approach was implemented: communication assessment used pass/fail grading and clinical assessment used points-based grading; each assessment was worth 50% of the total SP activity grade. Chi-square tests were used to compare the percentage of students who passed each assessment (≥70%) with those who failed. RESULTS: Across both academic years, students completed 9 formative (18 rubrics) and 6 summative (12 rubrics) SP activities. Each activity included separate communication and clinical assessment rubrics. There were no significant differences in performance on 27 of 30 rubrics. There were two formative SP activities where the percentage of students who passed the communication assessment using pass/fail grading (2022-2023 academic year) was different than points-based grading (2021-2022 academic year). In one fall semester activity, the cohort with the modified pass/fail grading approach had lower pass rates, but the opposite trend was observed in the winter semester. CONCLUSION: Our program was able to successfully move to a pass/fail approach for communication assessments of SP activities while maintaining points-based grading for clinical assessments in our P1 curriculum with minimal impact on student performance.

Summative Evaluation of Vaginal Surgery Skills: Setting A Pass-Fail Score.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We developed a summative assessment tool to evaluate competent performance on three procedure-specific low fidelity simulation models for vaginal surgery. Our purpose was to determine a pass-fail score for each model. METHODS: We enrolled participants (2011-2023, three Canadian academic centers) and grouped them according to operative competency in vaginal procedures. Novice operators were medical students recruited through targeted advertisement to clerkship level medical students. Proficient operators consisted of gynecology residents from the intervention arm of a randomized controlled trial, trained to competence in the use of the models; urogynecology fellows and attending gynecologic surgeons recruited through departmental rounds. All participants were asked to perform the three procedures on the models, were videotaped, and their performance assessed by evaluators familiar with the procedure and the scoring system, blinded to operator identity. A total performance score (range 0-400) assessed timing and errors. Basic skill deductions were set a priori. We calculated sensitivity and specificity scores and obtained an optimal cutoff based on Youden's J statistic. RESULTS: For anterior repair, we rated 46 novice and 16 proficient videos. The pass-fail score was 170/400. For posterior repair, we rated 54 novice and 14 proficient videos. The pass-fail score was 140/400. For vaginal hysterectomy, we rated 47 novice and 12 proficient videos. The pass-fail score was 180/400. Scores of proficient operators were significantly better than those of novice participants (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: A pass-fail score can distinguish between novice and proficient operators and can be used for summative assessment of surgical skill.

Patient-Related Factors Associated with Adverse Outcomes Following Weaning from Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vaECMO) removal reflects a critical moment and factors of adverse outcomes are incompletely understood. Thus, we studied various patient-related factors during vaECMO removal to determine their association with outcomes. METHODS: A total of 58 patients from a university hospital were included retrospectively. Demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic parameters were recorded while under vaECMO support, as well as the need for inotropic and vasoactive-inotropic scores (VIS). Successful weaning was defined as 28-day survival without reinitiation of vaECMO. RESULTS: Patient age differed significantly between patients with a successful and a failed vaECMO weaning (54 ± 14 vs. 62 ± 12 years, p = 0.029). In univariable logistic regression, age (OR 0.952 (0.909-0.997), p = 0.038), the necessities for inotropic agents at the time of echocardiography (OR 0.333 (0.113-0.981), p = 0.046), and vaECMO removal (OR 0.266 (0.081-0.877), p = 0.030) as well as the dobutamine dose during removal (OR 0.649 (0.473-0.890), p = 0.007), were significantly associated with a successful weaning from vaECMO. Age (HR 1.048 (1.006-1.091), p = 0.024) and the VIS (HR 1.030 (1.004-1.056), p = 0.025) at the time of vaECMO removal were independently associated with survival in bivariable Cox regression. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, a VIS of >5.1 at vaECMO removal was associated with impaired survival (log-rank p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, age and the extent of vasoactive-inotropic agents were associated with adverse outcomes following vaECMO, whereas echocardiographic biventricular function during vaECMO support was not.

Assessor discomfort and failure to fail in clinical performance assessments.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of trainee performance in the workplace is critical to ensuring high standards of clinical care. However, some supervisors find the task to be challenging, and may feel unable to deliver their true judgement on a trainee's performance. They may 'keep MUM' (that is, keep mum about undesirable messages) and fail to fail an underperforming trainee. In this study, we explore the effect of discomfort on assessors. METHODS: Using a survey method, supervisors of trainees in the Australasian College of Dermatologists were asked to self-report experiences of discomfort in various aspects of trainee workplace assessment and for their engagement in MUM behaviours including failure to fail. RESULTS: Sixty-one responses were received from 135 eligible assessors. 12.5% of assessors self-reported they had failed to fail a trainee and 18% admitted they had grade inflated a trainee's score on a clinical performance assessment in the previous 12-month period. Assessors who reported higher levels of discomfort in the clinical performance assessment context were significantly more likely to report previously failing to fail a trainee. The study did not reveal significant associations with assessor demographics and self-reports of discomfort or MUM behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals the impact of assessor discomfort on the accuracy of assessment information and feedback to trainees, including as a contributing factor to the failure to fail phenomenon. Addressing assessor experience of discomfort offers one opportunity to impact on the complex and multifactorial issue that failure to fail represents.

Longitudinal associations with positivity, quarantining and pass/fail policy use on student GPAs during the first three semesters of the pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: This research sought to understand the effects of testing positive, quarantining, and pass/fail policy use on college student GPAs across three semesters from Spring 2020 to Spring 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 644 students were followed across three semesters. METHODS: Anonymized secondary data sets regarding student health behaviors, perceived stress, and satisfaction were combined with registrar data concerning demographic factors, COVID-19 infection, the need to quarantine, and converting grades to pass/fail (P/F). RESULTS: The use of P/F was associated with inflated GPAs when offered during Spring and Fall 2020. Students opting to use P/F were more likely to be low-income and achieve a lower GPA in Spring 2021 when the P/F option was no longer offered. Testing positive and quarantining did not have a significant association with student GPA. CONCLUSIONS: The research challenges the value of providing students the ability to convert grades to P/F during the pandemic.

The Timing, Factors, and Impact of USMLE Step 1 Becoming Pass/Fail on the Process of Choosing a Specialty.

Background  Choosing a medical specialty is an important decision. A combination of factors influenced this decision. Student characteristics and examination performances can influence this decision. With the transition of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 becoming pass/fail, it is important to analyze the specialty decision process. Objective The purpose of this multimethod study is to assess when in the curriculum students choose a specialty, what factors influence their decision, and the impact of USMLE Step 1 scores on a student's assessment of competitiveness. Methods In February 2022, a survey was prepared and approved by the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV) Institutional Review Board (IRB). The survey contained multiple-choice questions and a free-response section. The survey was sent to the Class of 2022 and 2023 students at Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine who follow a Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship. Descriptive statistics and one-sample t-tests were calculated. Results A total of 89 students completed the survey: 42 out of 60 students (70%) from the Class of 2022 and 47 out of 61 students (77%) from the Class of 2023. This study found that 78.8% of longitudinal interleaved clerkship (LInC) students committed to their specialty during the second half of the clinical year. The effects of positive and negative experiences during clerkships were most significantly different (p < 0.001). Conclusion The majority of LInC students arrive at their decision by the latter half of the clinical year. A variety of factors help students arrive at their decision. Our findings suggest that the pass/fail grading system will make it more difficult for students to assess their personal competitiveness.

Ophthalmology Residency Program Director Survey on Pass/Fail U.S. Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 Scoring.

Background Beginning January 26, 2022, the U.S. Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 changed from a numerical score to pass/fail (P/F). The purpose of this study was to determine the perspective of ophthalmology program directors regarding this change in evaluating applicants. Methods After institutional review board approval, a survey was sent out to program directors of all 125 ophthalmology programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Survey questions asked for program demographics, the utility of USMLE Step 1 and 2 Clinical Knowledge scores in assessing applicants, and the importance of 16 different applicant metrics before and after Step 1 becomes P/F. The metrics examined were: letters of recommendation; clerkship grades; class ranking; Alpha Omega Alpha Membership; Gold Humanism Honor Society Membership; Dean's Letter; involvement and leadership; personal statement; number of abstracts, presentations, and publications; mean number of research experiences in the specialty; Step 2 Clinical Knowledge score; volunteering; preclinical grades; away rotation in the specialty; the applicant having another graduate degree; and graduation from a top 40 National Institutes of Health-funded program. Data were analyzed using nonoverlapping 95% confidence intervals. Results The survey was completed by 50 (40%) program directors. Sixty-eight percent of respondents stated a student's ranking would be considered more after USMLE Step 1 scores become P/F, and 60% stated medical schools should share clerkship shelf exam scores with residency programs. There were no significant differences in program directors' rankings of applicant metrics following the transition to P/F Step 1. Conclusion Based on our data, program directors will likely not place a greater emphasis on Step 2 scores, despite it being the only remaining objective measure for all applicants following the switch to a P/F Step 1. Nevertheless, program directors expressed an interest in receiving other objective measures, such as shelf exam scores and class ranking, as part of the application process. Notably, we found no significant changes in the rankings of various applicant metrics before and after the transition to P/F Step 1, indicating that the metrics that were important to program directors prior to the change remain just as critical in the new era of admissions.

The Effect of Pass/Fail Exam Grading on Exam Performance in a Pediatric Clerkship.

OBJECTIVE: Clerkship grades are a component of determining a residency candidate's competitiveness. In 2017, the University of Minnesota Medical School's pediatric clerkship transitioned its standardized multiple-choice exam, the Aquifer Pediatrics Examination, to pass/fail with eligibility for honors being determined by clinical performance, not exam performance. We assessed the effect this change had on Aquifer exam performance and evaluated for correlation between Aquifer exam performance and clinical evaluation scores in order to gather insight into the validity of each type of assessment with respect to one another. METHODS: We analyzed de-identified data from 750 medical students between the academic years of 2016 to 2017 and 2019 to 2020. Individual Aquifer exam scores were compared to individual clinical performance scores. Differences in exam performance before and after the transition to pass/fail were investigated with a two-sample t-test and Cohen's d for effect size. RESULTS: No correlation was found between Aquifer exam scores and clinical performance scores. The mean Aquifer exam score prior to the transition to pass/fail was 80.02 ± 7.51 while the mean after the exam was made pass/fail was 77.8 ± 7.42. This difference was statistically significant (P < .001) with a Cohen's d (effect size) of 0.297. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of correlation between the Aquifer exam scores and clinical performance scores was found. There was a small yet statistically significant decrease in Aquifer exam scores after the change to pass/fail; it is not clear if this represents a meaningful decrease in learning by students.

Experimental Therapeutics: Opportunities and Challenges Stemming From the National Institute of Mental Health Workshop on Novel Target Discovery and Psychosocial Intervention Development.

There has been slow progress in the development of interventions that prevent and/or reduce mental-health morbidity and mortality. The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) launched an experimental-therapeutics initiative with the goal of accelerating the development of effective interventions. The emphasis is on interventions designed to engage a target mechanism. A target mechanism is a process (e.g., behavioral, neurobiological) proposed to underlie change in a defined clinical endpoint and through change in which an intervention exerts its effect. This article is based on discussions from an NIMH workshop conducted in February 2020 and subsequent conversations among researchers using this approach. We discuss the components of an experimental-therapeutics approach such as clinical-outcome selection, target definition and measurement, intervention design and selection, and implementation of a team-science strategy. We emphasize the important contributions of different constituencies (e.g., patients, caregivers, providers) in deriving hypotheses about novel target mechanisms. We highlight strategies for target-mechanism identification using published and hypothetical examples. We consider the decision-making dilemmas that arise with different patterns of results in purported mechanisms and clinical outcomes. We end with considerations of the practical challenges of this approach and the implications for future directions of this initiative.

The Evaluation of Different Treatment Approaches in Patients With Earthquake-Related Crush Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: On February 6, 2023, an earthquake occurred in Kahramanmaras, Turkey, resulting in loss of life, injuries, and the displacement of thousands of people. The aim of this study is to determine the factors affecting amputation and fasciotomy decisions in patients with crush syndrome, along with clinical laboratory parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included patients over 18 years of age who presented with crush injuries and exhibited systemic symptoms. Inclusion criteria comprised patients with creatine kinase (CK) levels exceeding 1,000 IU/L, oliguria (urine output less than 400 mL per day), elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels surpassing 40 mg/dL, serum creatinine exceeding 1.5 mg/dL, potassium levels over 6 mEq/L, phosphorus levels surpassing 8 mg/dL, and serum calcium levels below 8 mg/dL. Multiple parameters were evaluated, including blood glucose, serum sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, BUN, creatinine, uric acid, CK, albumin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, prothrombin time (international normalized ratio (INR)), urinalysis, C-reactive protein (CRP), venous blood gas, ECG, and chest radiography. RESULTS: Following the Maras earthquake, a total of 3,184 patients were admitted to our hospital within the first seven days. Out of these patients, 2,216 received outpatient treatment, 639 were hospitalized in the general ward, and 128 were admitted to the intensive care unit. Among the admitted patients, 237 were diagnosed with crush syndrome, with 126 being male and 111 being female. The average duration of being trapped under debris was eight hours, ranging from four to 36 hours. In the study population, extremity trauma was observed in 84 patients, thoracic trauma in 32 patients, and abdominal trauma in 20 patients. Erythrocyte replacement was administered to 123 patients, while fresh frozen plasma was given to 69 patients, for a total of 1008 units utilized. Mannitol infusions were provided to 58 patients, while bicarbonate infusions were administered to 116 patients. Among the cohort, 71 patients underwent dialysis, with nine of them receiving hemodialysis along with mannitol. Additionally, 67 patients experienced stage 3 acute kidney injury, and 41 patients were deceased. None of the patients required permanent hemodialysis. CONCLUSION: Earthquakes are considered to be one of nature's most significant and inevitable disasters. While it is impossible to prevent them, effective management strategies are crucial in mitigating the ensuing chaos and reducing casualties. In order to achieve this, it is imperative to draw lessons from past seismic events and apply appropriate treatment protocols to the affected individuals.

A Survey of Otolaryngology Residency Programs on Adapting to the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 Transitioning to Pass/Fail.

Objectives In February 2020, the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) announced that the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 licensing examination would change from a numerical score to Pass/Fail (P/F). After implementation, many believe that USMLE-Step 2-Clinical Knowledge (CK) will become an important metric for students applying to otolaryngology (ENT). The purpose of this study is to determine factors important to resident selection after these changes. Methods A survey containing 15 questions related to resident selection practices and how changing USMLE Step 1 to P/F would impact future resident selection was designed. It was distributed to all ENT residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Results Forty percent of programs responded; 66% (95% confidence interval (CI): 51.1%-78.4%) felt that changing Step 1 scoring would not lead to students being more prepared for clinical rotations; 55% believe class rank will increase in significance (95% CI: 35.7%-64.3%). There was also an increase in the importance of Step 2 CK, which had a mean ranking of 10.67 prior to changes in Step 1 scoring and increased to 7.80 after P/F. Conclusions The changes in Step 1 scoring will likely lead to increasing importance of other objective measures like class rank or Step 2 CK. This may defeat the intended purpose put forth by the NBME. Therefore, further guidance on measures correlated with student performance as a resident will be integral to the selection process.

Fail-tests of DNA methylation clocks, and development of a noise barometer for measuring epigenetic pressure of aging and disease.

This study shows that Elastic Net (EN) DNA methylation (DNAme) clocks have low accuracy of predictions for individuals of the same age and a low resolution between healthy and disease cohorts; caveats inherent in applying linear model to non-linear processes. We found that change in methylation of cytosines with age is, interestingly, not the determinant for their selection into the clocks. Moreover, an EN clock's selected cytosines change when non-clock cytosines are removed from the training data; as expected from optimization in a machine learning (ML) context, but inconsistently with the identification of health markers in a biological context. To address these limitations, we moved from predictions to measurement of biological age, focusing on the cytosines that on average remain invariable in their methylation through lifespan, postulated to be homeostatically vital. We established that dysregulation of such cytosines, measured as the sums of standard deviations of their methylation values, quantifies biological noise, which in our hypothesis is a biomarker of aging and disease. We term this approach a "noise barometer" - the pressure of aging and disease on an organism. These noise-detecting cytosines are particularly important as sums of SD on the entire 450K DNAme array data yield a random pattern through chronology. Testing how many cytosines of the 450K arrays become noisier with age, we found that the paradigm of DNAme noise as a biomarker of aging and disease remarkably manifests in ~1/4 of the total. In that large set even the cytosines that have on average constant methylation through age show increased SDs and can be used as noise detectors of the barometer.

Course repetition in pre-licensure nursing students: A scoping review.

SIGNIFICANCE OF PROBLEM: Nursing student attrition is a global issue affecting students, nursing programs, and the profession. One group of nursing students at risk for attrition are those that have failed and need to repeat a required nursing course. These students experience academic consequences such as delayed graduation and entry into the workforce, further contributing to the nursing shortage. Unfortunately, current literature about nursing student repeaters remains inadequate, and evidence of support measures is minimal. PURPOSE: This scoping review aims to summarize the literature on course repetition in pre-licensure nursing students and identify gaps in the literature about this population. METHODS: Arskey and O'Malley's (2005) five-step procedure was used as the organizing framework to explore course repetition in pre-licensure nursing students. RESULTS: There were twenty articles relevant for this scoping review. The findings revealed nursing student repeaters are at an increased risk for subsequent failure and attrition. Students experienced shock, sadness, and uncertainty when course failure ensued. Nursing students sought additional help while repeating failed courses, but interventions solely harnessed toward student repeaters can be beneficial. CONCLUSION: Nursing student repeaters are a unique population that requires a multifaceted approach, including academic and non-academic support structures, to ensure they meet the educational standards of the repeated course. Future studies regarding this population should include progression policies' impact on student success and strategies and interventions that create positive outcomes among student repeaters.