Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) delivers a high dose of radiation to a specific brain area while limiting radiation to nearby healthy tissue. While most SRS has traditionally been performed with a stereotactic frame-based approach, this study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of frameless radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases. Our study followed the recommended guidelines summarized in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. The electronic databases of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS) were searched from inception to 10 October 2023. The pooled rate of outcomes was calculated using random effect model and Restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) method. All statistical analysis was performed by STATA V.17. A total of 499 studies were recruited from the electronic databases. After removing duplicates (n = 117), 382 studies were used for title/abstract, and 329 were removed from the study selection process. A total of 53 articles were used for full-text assessment, and 35 studies were included for data extraction. Our analysis revealed a significant increase across all pooled survival rates and local control rates by initiating the radiosurgery for patients, estimating the pooled 6-month OSR of 75% (95% CI: 68-81%), 1-year overall survival rate (OSR) of 60% (95% CI: 51-69%), 18-month OSR of 48% (95% CI: 10-85%), 2-year OSR of 39% (95% CI: 19-58%), 1-year progression-free survival rate (PFSR) of 68% (95% CI: 39-98%), 2-year PFSR of 75% (95% CI: 58-91%), 6-month local control rate (LCR) of 93% (95% CI: 90-96%), and 12-month LCR of 86% (95% CI: 82-90%). Our meta-analysis findings confirm the efficacy of frameless radiosurgery in treating brain metastases. Using data from several trials, we were able to demonstrate stereotactic radiosurgery's effectiveness as a therapy option for brain metastasis patients, demonstrating local control and reasonable overall survival.

Robot-assisted stereotactic electroencephalography using 3-dimensional intraoperative imaging and frameless registration tool.

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is the gold standard to investigate the epileptic network in cases of drug-resistant epilepsy. Robot-assisted SEEG is increasingly being used; however, its installation process in the operating room is more difficult than that of the stereotactic frame procedure. New robotic tools and 3D intraoperative imaging ease the setup while achieving the same mechanical precision and a lower complication rate. In this video, the authors illustrate the surgical technique and step-by-step workflow using a robotic arm (neuromate) guided by a frameless registration system (neurolocate), registered with an intraoperative flat-panel CT scanner (O-arm). The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2024.4.FOCVID2419.

Comparison of Navigated and Frame-Based Stereotactic Biopsy-A Single-Center Cohort Study.

Background and Objectives: As brain lesions present complex diagnostic challenges, accurate tissue sampling via biopsy is critical for effective treatment planning. Traditional frame-based stereotactic biopsy has been complemented by navigated biopsy techniques, leveraging advancements in imaging and navigation technology. This study aims to compare the navigated and frame-based stereotactic biopsy methods in a clinical setting, evaluating their efficacy, safety, and diagnostic outcomes to determine the optimal approach for precise brain lesion targeting. Materials and Methods: retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent brain biopsies between January 2017 and August 2023 at an academic medical center. Data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, biopsy technique (navigated vs. frame-based), and outcomes including accuracy, complications, and hospital stay duration were analyzed. Results: The cohort comprised 112 patients, with no significant age or gender differences between groups. Symptoms leading to biopsy were predominantly diminished muscle strength (42.0%), cognitive issues (28.6%), and aphasia (24.1%). Tumors were most common in the deep hemisphere (24.1%). The median hospital stay was 5 days, with a rehospitalization rate of 27.7%. Complications occurred in 4.47% of patients, showing no significant difference between biopsy methods. However, navigated biopsies resulted in fewer samples (p < 0.001) but with comparable diagnostic accuracy as frame-based biopsies. Conclusions: Navigated and frame-based stereotactic biopsies are both effective and safe, with comparable accuracy and complication rates. The choice of technique should consider lesion specifics, surgeon preference, and technological availability. The findings highlight the importance of advanced neurosurgical techniques in enhancing patient care and outcomes.

Phantom and in vivo accuracy of frameless optical navigation in stereotactic laser interstitial thermal therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Targeting accuracy presents a key factor in achieving maximal safe ablation in laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). The VarioGuide system has proven precise for brain biopsies, but data showing its accuracy in combination with LITT are limited. The aim of this study was to determine the phantom and in vivo accuracy of LITT probe placement using the VarioGuide system and to evaluate the effect of targeting error on maximum possible ablation volume. METHODS: Stereotactic LITT probe placement was performed using the VarioGuide system in 3 phantom skulls. The same system was used in 10 patients treated with LITT, for which data were retrospectively analyzed. Target point error (TPE), target depth deviation (TDD), target lateral deviation (TLD), and angular deviation (AD) were derived from intraprocedural MRI scans of both the phantom and in vivo trajectories. In vivo, the effect of targeting error on the maximum reachable ablation was calculated as the difference between the planned maximal achievable tumor ablation (PTA) and the actual maximal achievable tumor ablation (ATA). RESULTS: In total, 24 phantom and 16 in vivo trajectories were analyzed. In the phantom setting, the median TPE was 3.3 mm and median AD was 1.9°. Targeting accuracy significantly decreased for longer trajectories and those less perpendicular to the skull. In patients, the authors observed a comparable median TPE of 4.0 mm but significantly higher AD of 3.2°. In vivo, targeting inaccuracy resulted in a median decrease in maximum achievable ablation volume of 6% as compared to the planned trajectory. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' study indicates that utilizing the VarioGuide system in combination with LITT yields an average targeting error as large as 4 mm, which was smaller for shorter and straighter trajectories. In patients, targeting inaccuracy resulted in a median 6% decrease of the planned tumor ablation volume. These are important factors that should be considered in optimal case planning and patient selection in LITT.

A prospective randomized study comparing two frameless immobilization systems for cranial stereotactic radiotherapy.

Introduction: The Dual Shell Encompass Fibreplast™ System (DS-Encompass) by CQ Medical™ is validated for frameless immobilization in stereotactic brain radiotherapy. An alternative mask model has been proposed with the rear shell replaced by a Moldcare® cushion (M-Encompass). To validate the use of this model in our cranial stereotactic workflow method including HyperArc™, we performed a prospective randomized study comparing inter-and intrafractional motion and patients comfort between both masks. Materials & Methods: A prospective randomized study between DS-Encompass and M-Encompass was conducted involving 60 participants. Stratification between DS-Encompass and M-Encompass was carried out based on the fractionation scheme. Treatment plans were created with HyperArc™. During treatment, surface guidance was used for patient positioning and monitoring. A pre-treatment cone-beam CT (CBCT) was acquired to correct interfractional motion and a post-treatment CBCT was acquired to quantify the intrafractional motion. Patients reported comfort was analyzed with a Likert-scale at the end of the treatment. Unpaired t-tests were conducted to determine the level of significance. Results: No significant difference in interfractional translations is present. A significant difference is revealed in roll-axis rotation, where DS-Encompass allows for smaller deviations. Since interfractional motion can be corrected through daily CBCT-scans and 6D-couch corrections, they are clinically irrelevant. Intrafractional motion does not differ significantly and remains below 0.5 mm and 0.5° for both systems. There is no statistical difference in patient-reported comfort. Conclusion: We conclude that Encompass with Moldcare offers a safe alternative to Duall Shell Encompass for non-coplanar stereotactic brain radiotherapy. There is no significant difference in intrafractional motion nor difference in comfort levels.

Dynamic Workflow Proposal for Continuous Frameless Electromagnetic Neuronavigation in Rigid Neuroendoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Ventriculoscopic neuronavigation has been described in several articles. However, there are different ventriculoscopes and navigation systems. Due to these different combinations, it is difficult to find detailed neuronavigation protocols. We describe, step-by-step, a simple method to navigate both the trajectory until reaching the ventricular system, as well as the intraventricular work. METHODS: We use a rigid ventriculoscope (LOTTA, KarlStorz) with an electromagnetic stylet (S8-StealthSystem, Medtronic). The protocol is based on a modified or 3-dimensionally printed trocar for navigating the extraventricular step and on a modified pediatric nasogastric tube for the intraventricular navigation. RESULTS: This protocol can be set up in less than 10 minutes. The extraventricular part is navigated by introducing the electromagnetic stylet inside the modified or 3-dimensionally printed trocar. Intraventricular navigation is done by combining a modified pediatric nasogastric tube with the electromagnetic stylet inside the endoscope's working channel. The most critical point is to obtain a blunt-bloodless ventriculostomy while achieving perfect alignment of all targeted structures via pure straight trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: This protocol is easy-to-set-up, avoids head rigid-fixation and bulky optical-based attachments to the ventriculoscope, and allows continuous navigation of both parts of the surgery. Since we have implemented this protocol, we have noticed a significant enhancement in both simple and complex ventriculoscopic procedures because the surgery is dramatically simplified.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for idiopathic glossopharyngeal neuralgia: A systematic review.

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has recently gained space as an accepted non-invasive alternative treatment option for drug resistant Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN). The purpose of this systematic review was to provide an overview of the outcomes of SRS treatment in patients with GPN. Methods: A literature review until March 2023 was performed. Data about patient's demographics, complications and recurrence rates, additional treatment post procedure as well as pain outcomes in the short and long term were collected. Studies without reported pain outcomes were excluded. Results: Sixteen studies with a total of 97 patients diagnosed with GPN who had undergone SRS were identified. The mean reported maximal radiation dose ranged from 70 to 88.7 Gy with the glossopharyngeal meatus (GPM) being the most common target in 12/16 studies. The median time from SRS till pain response was between 2 and 120 days. The mean proportion of patients requiring further treatment after SRS ranged from 11.1 to 57.14% in a time frame between 2 and 36 months post procedure. Favourable pain response rates after SRS (BNI-IIIb) ranged from 60% to 100% and 57.1%-100% in short and long term respectively. Conclusion: SRS for GPN remains a safe alternative to surgery with low complication rates and favourable pain outcomes in both short and long term.

Stereotactic placement of dual lumen catheter system for continuous drainage, irrigation, and intraventricular antibiotic therapy for treatment of brain abscess with ventriculitis - A case report and literature review.

Background: Cerebral abscesses complicated by ventriculitis present significant treatment challenges, often associated with high morbidity and mortality. Traditional management approaches, including systemic antibiotic therapy and external ventricular drainage (EVD), face limitations due to the blood-brain barrier and risks of catheter-related complications. This report discusses a case where the dual-lumen catheter system, an innovative neurosurgical tool integrating continuous irrigation with drainage, was employed. Case Description: A patient presented with a cerebral abscess ruptured into the ventricle, leading to ventriculitis. Conventional treatment options were limited due to the abscess's deep and eloquent location and the associated risk of complications from standard EVD. The dual lumen system was chosen for its ability to provide continuous irrigation and drainage, effectively addressing issues of catheter blockage and enhancing localized antibiotic delivery. The system was used to create a single stereotactic tract for simultaneous treatment of the abscess and ventriculitis. This approach allowed for a more controlled and effective treatment process, resulting in rapid resolution of the conditions without chronic hydrocephalus development or further complications. Conclusion: The use of the dual lumen system represented a significant advancement in this case, addressing the limitations of conventional treatments. Its ability to maintain intracranial pressure within optimal limits while providing localized, continuous treatment was pivotal. This case highlights the potential of the dual lumen catheter in managing complex neurosurgical infections and underscores the need for further research to establish its efficacy in broader clinical applications.

Long-term safety and efficacy of frameless subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is standard of care for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and a correct lead placement is crucial to obtain good clinical outcomes. Evidence demonstrating the targeting accuracy of the frameless technique for DBS, along with the advantages for patients and clinicians, is solid, while data reporting long-term clinical outcomes for PD patients are still lacking. OBJECTIVES: The study aims to assess the clinical safety and efficacy of frameless bilateral STN-DBS in PD patients at 5 years from surgery. METHODS: Consecutive PD patients undergoing bilateral STN-DBS with a frameless system were included in this single-center retrospective study. Clinical features, including the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in its total motor score and axial sub-scores, and pharmacological regimen were assessed at baseline, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery. The adverse events related to the procedure, stimulation, or the presence of the hardware were systematically collected. RESULTS: Forty-one PD patients undergone bilateral STN-DBS implantation were included in the study and fifteen patients already completed the 5-year observation. No complications occurred during surgery and the perioperative phase, and no unexpected serious adverse event occurred during the entire follow-up period. At 5 years from surgery, there was a sustained motor efficacy of STN stimulation: STN-DBS significantly improved the off-stim UPDRS III score at 5 years by 37.6% (P < 0.001), while the dopaminergic medications remained significantly reduced compared to baseline (- 21.6% versus baseline LEDD; P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the use of the frameless system for STN-DBS in PD patients, as a safe and well-tolerated technique, with long-term clinical benefits and persistent motor efficacy at 5 years from the surgery.

Interactive Multi-Stage Robotic Positioner for Intra-Operative MRI-Guided Stereotactic Neurosurgery.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrates clear advantages over other imaging modalities in neurosurgery with its ability to delineate critical neurovascular structures and cancerous tissue in high-resolution 3D anatomical roadmaps. However, its application has been limited to interventions performed based on static pre/post-operative imaging, where errors accrue from stereotactic frame setup, image registration, and brain shift. To leverage the powerful intra-operative functions of MRI, e.g., instrument tracking, monitoring of physiological changes and tissue temperature in MRI-guided bilateral stereotactic neurosurgery, a multi-stage robotic positioner is proposed. The system positions cannula/needle instruments using a lightweight (203 g) and compact (Ø97 × 81 mm) skull-mounted structure that fits within most standard imaging head coils. With optimized design in soft robotics, the system operates in two stages: i) manual coarse adjustment performed interactively by the surgeon (workspace of ±30°), ii) automatic fine adjustment with precise (<0.2° orientation error), responsive (1.4 Hz bandwidth), and high-resolution (0.058°) soft robotic positioning. Orientation locking provides sufficient transmission stiffness (4.07 N/mm) for instrument advancement. The system's clinical workflow and accuracy is validated with lab-based (<0.8 mm) and MRI-based testing on skull phantoms (<1.7 mm) and a cadaver subject (<2.2 mm). Custom-made wireless omni-directional tracking markers facilitated robot registration under MRI.

Review of the targeting accuracy of frameless and frame-based robot-assisted deep brain stimulation electrode implantation in pediatric patients using the Neurolocate module.

OBJECTIVE: The Neurolocate module is a 3D frameless patient registration module that is designed for use with the Neuromate stereotactic robot. Long-term electrical stimulation of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) via deep brain electrode implantation is particularly successful in a select group of movement disorders in pediatric patients. This study aimed to review the targeting accuracy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implantation in a single center, comparing standard frame-based techniques to the frameless Neurolocate module. METHODS: Twenty-four pediatric patients underwent implantation of bilateral DBS electrodes under general anesthesia during the period of August 2018-August 2022. All patients underwent robot-assisted stereotactic implantation of DBS electrodes using an intraoperative O-arm 3D scanner to confirm the final electrode position. These coordinates were compared with the planned entry and target, with attention to depth, radial, directional, and absolute errors, in addition to Euclidean distance (ED). The primary outcome evaluated the accuracy and safety of the Neurolocate frameless technology compared with standard frame-based techniques. RESULTS: Of the 24 bilateral DBS electrode implantations performed, 62.5% used Neurolocate technology: 87.5% were delivered to the GPi and the remaining 12.5% to the STN. The mean patient age was 11.0 (range 4-18) years and 70.8% were male. The median absolute errors in x-, y-, and z-axes were 0.35, 0.75, and 0.9 mm, respectively, using the Neurolocate module compared with 0.30, 0.95, and 1.1 mm using the standard frame-based technique. The median ED from the planned target to the actual electrode position with the Neurolocate module was 1.28 mm versus 1.69 mm using standard frame-based techniques. No major perioperative complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic robot-assisted DBS implantation with the frameless Neurolocate module is safe for use in the pediatric population, showing good surgical accuracy and no inferiority to standard frame-based techniques. The Neurolocate module for robotic DBS surgery has the potential to improve surgical targeting accuracy, surgical time, patient comfort, and safety.

Application accuracy of a frameless optical neuronavigation system as a guide for craniotomies in dogs.

BACKGROUND: Optical neuronavigation systems using infrared light to create a virtual reality image of the brain allow the surgeon to track instruments in real time. Due to the high vulnerability of the brain, neurosurgical interventions must be performed with a high precision. The aim of the experimental cadaveric study was to determine the application accuracy of a frameless optical neuronavigation system as guide for craniotomies by determining the target point deviation of predefined target points at the skull surface in the area of access to the cerebrum, cerebellum and the pituitary fossa. On each of the five canine cadaver heads ten target points were marked in a preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. These target points were found on the cadaver skulls using the optical neuronavigation system. Then a small drill hole (1.5 mm) was drilled at these points. Subsequently, another CT scan was made. Both CT data sets were fused into the neuronavigation software, and the actual target point coordinates were identified. The target point deviation was determined as the difference between the planned and drilled target point coordinates. The calculated deviation was compared between two observers. RESULTS: The analysis of the target point accuracies of all dogs in both observers taken together showed a median target point deviation of 1.57 mm (range: 0.42 to 5.14 mm). No significant differences were found between the observers or the different areas of target regions. CONCLUSION: The application accuracy of the described system is similar to the accuracy of other optical neuronavigation systems previously described in veterinary medicine, in which mean values of 1.79 to 4.3 mm and median target point deviations of 0.79 to 3.53 mm were determined.

Accuracy and Utility of Frameless Stereotactic Placement of Stereoelectroencephalography Electrodes.

BACKGROUND: Successful surgery for epilepsy hinges on identification of the epileptogenic focus. Stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is the most effective way to identify most seizure foci. There are multiple methods of inserting depth electrodes, including frame-based, frameless, and robot-assisted techniques. Studies have shown the accuracy of frame-based and robotic-assisted techniques to be statistically similar, while only one study has detailed the frameless sEEG insertion technique. METHODS: Patients underwent placement of sEEG depth electrodes using frameless stereotaxy from September 2019 to September 2021 at Geisinger Medical Center by a single surgeon. Seizure history, electrode placement accuracy relative to the planned trajectories, surgical times, success rate of identifying the epileptogenic focus, and subsequent seizure control rates after surgical treatment were documented. RESULTS: Data were available for 21 patients and 181 electrodes inserted using the VarioGuide frameless stereotactic system. Each insertion took an average of 14.5 minutes per lead. Average entry variance was 2.7 mm with an average target variance of 4.6 mm. The epileptogenic focus was identified in 19 of 21 patients, and further surgical treatment was performed in 18 of 21 patients (85.7%). CONCLUSIONS: VarioGuide frameless stereotaxy for sEEG placement is comparable to frame-based and robotic-assisted techniques with statistically similar rates of epileptic focus identification. Lead placement accuracy is slightly lower and time per lead is slightly higher relative to robot-assisted surgeries. When a robot system is unavailable, surgeons can consider using a frameless stereotactic technique for sEEG insertion, allowing patients to benefit from a similarly high rate of epileptic zone identification.

Safety and efficacy of brain biopsy: Results from a single institution retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: Brain biopsy provides important histopathological diagnostic information for patients with new intracranial lesions. Although a minimally invasive technique, previous studies report an associated morbidity and mortality between 0.6% and 6.8%. We sought to characterise the risk linked to this procedure, and to establish the feasibility of instigating a day-case brain biopsy pathway at our institution. Materials and methods: This single-centre retrospective case series study included neuronavigation guided mini craniotomy and frameless stereotactic brain biopsies carried out between April 2019 and December 2021. Exclusion criteria were interventions performed for non-neoplastic lesions. Demographic data, clinical and radiological presentation, type of biopsy, histology and complications in the post-operative period were recorded. Results: Data from 196 patients with a mean age of 58.7 years (SD+/-14.4 years) was analysed. 79% (n=155) were frameless stereotactic biopsies and 21% (n=41) neuronavigation guided mini craniotomy biopsies. Complications resulting in acute intracerebral haemorrhage and death, or new persistent neurological deficits were observed in 2% of patients (n=4; 2 frameless stereotactic; 2 open). Less severe complications or transient symptoms were noted in 2.5% of cases (n=5). 8 patients had minor haemorrhages in the biopsy tract with no clinical ramifications. Biopsy was non-diagnostic in 2.5% (n=5) of cases. Two cases were subsequently identified as lymphoma. Other reasons included insufficient sampling, necrotic tissue, and target error. Discussion and conclusion: This study demonstrates that brain biopsy is a procedure with an acceptably low rate of severe complications and mortality, in line with previously published literature. This supports the development of day-case pathway allowing improved patient flow, reducing the risk of iatrogenic complications associated with hospital stay, such as infection and thrombosis.

Frameless versus frame-based stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A propensity-matched analysis.

Objective: The frameless linear accelerator (LINAC) based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been evolving with a reduction in patient discomfort. However, there was limited evidence comparing frame-based and frameless SRS for intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVM). We aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between frame-based and frameless LINAC SRS. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort compared the outcomes of frame-based LINAC SRS (1998-2009) with frameless LINAC SRS (2010-2020). The primary outcome was the obliteration rate. The other outcomes included the neurological, radiological, and functional outcomes after SRS. A matched cohort was identified by propensity scores for further comparisons. Results: A total of 65 patients were included with a mean follow-up time of 13.2 years (158.5 months). There were 40 patients in the frame-based group and 25 patients in the frameless group. The overall obliteration rate was comparable (Frame-based 82.5% vs Frameless 80.0%, p = 0.310) and not significantly different over time (log-rank p = 0.536). The crude post-SRS hemorrhage rate was 1.5% and the incidence was 0.3 per 100 person-years. There were 67.7% of patients with AVM obliteration without new persistent neurological deficits at the last visit and 56.9% of patients with AVM obliteration without any deficits (transient or persistent) during the entire follow-up period. Four patients (8.0%) developed late onset persistent adverse radiation effects (more than 96 months after SRS) among 50 patients with more than 8-year surveillance. In the propensity-matched cohort of 42 patients, there was no significant difference in AVM obliteration (Frame-based vs Frameless, log-rank p = 0.984). Conclusion: Frameless and frame-based LINAC SRS have comparable efficacy in intracranial AVM obliteration. A longer follow-up duration may further characterize the rate of late adverse radiation effects in frameless SRS.

Evaluation of Overshunting between Low and Medium Pressure Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts in Dogs with Severe Hydrocephalus Using Frameless Stereotactic Ventricular Shunt Placement.

Hydrocephalus is a neurological disorder characterized by an abnormal accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within the ventricular system of the brain, leading to cerebral ventricular dilation, brain parenchyma compression, and neuronal cell loss. Surgery is an effective method of draining excessive amounts of CSF. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) allows excess CSF to divert into the abdomen; this device is the most commonly used in the treatment of hydrocephalus both in veterinary and human patients. This study aims to describe the application of two types of VPS, low-pressure valve and medium-pressure valve, using a frameless stereotactic neuronavigational system in eight severe hydrocephalus in dogs and, in particular, analyze the prevalence of postoperative overshunting. Non-communicating hydrocephalus was found in seven dogs, whereas the rest of them had communicating hydrocephalus caused by traumatic brain injury with a skull fracture. The criteria for pressure valve selection depended on the intraoperative intraventricular pressure (IVP) that was determined by the adaptive manometer, according to the human protocol. Low-pressure valve placement was performed in five dogs, and the others received medium-pressure valve placement. The follow-up period was 2 weeks, 4-12 weeks, and 12 weeks to 12 months. Pre- and postoperative information including neurological signs, CT-Scan or MRI, medical treatment, complications, and ventricular volume were compared in all dogs. Seven dogs showed neurological improvement within 2 weeks after surgery. Overshunting was seen in four dogs who received low-pressure valve placement. Three of them had shunt infections within 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. One dog underwent shunt revision from a low-pressure valve to a medium-pressure valve caused by severe overshunting and progressive neurological signs. In addition, cognitive and learning improvements were evaluated based on the owners' feedback, and neurological signs were examined during the follow-up period in two dogs that received low-pressure valve placement. We conclude that a medium-pressure valve is recommended for overshunting prevention. However, low-pressure valve placement seems to improve cognitive function and learning ability, which is related to an increase in the brain parenchyma observed during long-term monitoring. Moreover, we also report our experience and surgical procedure for frameless stereotactic ventricular shunt placement (FSVSP) in VPS surgery in dogs affected by hydrocephalus.

Calculation of set-up margin in frameless stereotactic radiotherapy accounting for translational and rotational patient positing error.

Context: Rotation corrected set-up margins in stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Aims: This study aimed to calculate the rotational positional error corrected set-up margin in frameless SRT. Settings and Design: 6D setup errors for the steriotactic radiotherapy patients were converted to 3D translational only error mathematically. Setup margins were calculated with and without considering the rotational error and compared. Materials and Methods: A total of 79 patients of SRT each received >1 fraction (3-6 fractions) incorporated in this study. Two cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were acquired for each session of treatment, before and after the robotic couch-aided patient position correction using a CBCT. The postpositional correction set-up margin was calculated using the van Herk formula. Further, a planning target volume_R (PTV_R) (with rotational correction) and PTV_NR (without rotational correction) were calculated by applying the rotation corrected and uncorrected set-up margins on the gross tumor volumes (GTVs). Statistical Analysis Used: General. Results: A total of 380 sessions of pre- (190) and post (190) table positional correction CBCT was analyzed. Posttable position correction mean positional error for lateral, longitudinal, and vertical translational and rotational shifts was (x)-0.01 ± 0.05 cm, (y)-0.02 ± 0.05 cm, (z) 0.00 ± 0.05 cm, and (θ) 0.04° ± 0.3°, (Φ) 0.1° ± 0.4°, (Ψ) 0.0° ± 0.4°, respectively. The GTV volumes show a range of 0.13 cc-39.56 cc, with a mean volume of 6.35 ± 8.65 cc. Rotational correction incorporated postpositional correction set-up margin the in lateral (x), longitudinal (y) and vertical (z) directions were 0.05 cm, 0.12 cm, and 0.1 cm, respectively. PTV_R ranges from 0.27 cc to 44.7 cc, with a mean volume of 7.7 ± 9.8 cc. PTV_NR ranges from 0.32 cc to 46.0 cc, with a mean volume of 8.1 ± 10.1 cc. Conclusions: The postcorrection linear set-up margin matches well with the conventional set-up margin of 1 mm. Beyond a GTV radius of 2 cm, the difference between PTV_NR and PTV_R is ≤2.5%, hence not significant.

Biopsies of Caudal Brainstem Tumors in Pediatric Patients-A Single-Center Retrospective Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: The indication for performing biopsies in patients with diffuse lesions in the brain stem is controversial. The possible risks associated with the technically challenging interventions must be balanced against clarifying the diagnosis and the possible therapeutic options. We reviewed the feasibility, risk profile, and diagnostic yield of different biopsy techniques in a pediatric cohort. METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients aged <18 years who had undergone biopsy of the caudal brainstem region (pons, medulla oblongata) at our pediatric neurosurgical center from 2009 to 2022. RESULTS: We identified 27 children. Biopsies were performed using frameless stereotactic (Varioguide; n = 12), robotic-assisted (Autoguide; n = 4), endoscopic (n = 3), and open biopsy (n = 8) techniques. Intervention-related mortality was not observed. Three patients experienced a transient postoperative neurological deficit. No patient experienced intervention-related permanent morbidity. Biopsy yielded the histopathological diagnosis in all 27 cases. Molecular analysis was feasible for 97% of the cases. The most common diagnosis was H3K27M-mutated diffuse midline glioma (60%). Low-grade gliomas were identified in 14% of patients. Overall survival was 62.5% after 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Biopsies of the caudal brainstem in children were feasible and safe in the presented setup. The amount of tumor material acquired allowing for an integrated diagnosis and was obtained at reasonable risk. The selection of the surgical technique depends on the tumor location and growth pattern. We recommend the performance of brainstem tumor biopsies in children at specialized centers to better understand the biology and enable possible novel therapeutic options.

Mask dependency of the lacrimal gland dose under whole brain radiotherapy when the six-degrees of freedom couch is not available.

BACKGROUND: Dry eye syndrome has been recently reported in patients who underwent whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). WBRT based on a couch with three-degrees of freedom (3D) can occasionally be performed in which the rotational head motion is not corrected. This study assessed the dependency of the rotational errors on the mask and the dose variation of the lens and lacrimal gland in WBRT patients. METHODS: Translational and rotational setup errors were obtained at the first treatment with cone-beam CT (CBCT) for patients under WBRT and frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (n = 20 each) immobilized using a conventional WB mask and an SRS mask with a bite block, respectively. For the CT sets of SRS cases, WBRT plans were generated for the study. To simulate the rotational error, rotated CT images were created with each rotational error, on which initial WBRT plans were copied and doses were recalculated. The lens and lacrimal gland doses with and without rotation errors were compared. RESULTS: Despite similar translational setup errors for the two masks, the SRS mask showed a dramatic reduction in rotational errors compared to those of the WB mask. The errors varied within -2.9° to 2.9° and -1.2° to 0.7° for the WB and SRS masks, respectively. Accordingly, the SRS mask confined the change in the maximum lens dose, mean dose of the lacrimal gland, and lacrimal volume receiving 15 Gy to one-third of those using the WB mask. CONCLUSION: When the six-degrees of freedom (6D) couch is not available, the frameless SRS mask is beneficial to WBRT for the faithful treatment as it was planned.