Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 4.571
Filtrar
1.
Cureus ; 16(7): e63577, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39087171

RESUMO

Bisphosphonates are widely used for a number of metabolic bone conditions. Orbital inflammation is a very rare side effect of bisphosphonate therapy that can risk permanent visual loss. We describe the complex case and successful treatment of a 79-year-old man who developed orbital cellulitis following the use of intravenous pamidronate disodium for severe hypercalcaemia. The challenges regarding the diagnosis of parathyroid carcinoma are also discussed.

2.
Clin Interv Aging ; 19: 1287-1300, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39050519

RESUMO

Purpose: Identify the prevalence and prevalence differences of fall risk factors by sex, clinic rurality, and race/ethnicity among older adults (≥65 years old) receiving outpatient rehabilitation. Patients and Methods: Our secondary analysis used Electronic Health Record data of 108,751 older adults attending outpatient rehabilitation (2018-2022) within a large health system across 7 states and completed the Stay Independent Questionnaire. The mean age was 73.3 (±6.36), 58.1% were female, 84.3% were non-Hispanic White, and 88.8% attended an urban clinic. Fall risks were identified via the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Stay Independent Questionnaire. Results: Older adults had a high prevalence of fall risks (44.3%), including history of falls (34.9%). The most prevalent fall-risk factors were impaired strength, gait, and balance. Compared to males, females had a higher prevalence of reporting a fall (4.3%), a fall with injury (9.9%), worrying about falling 9.1%), rushing to the toilet (8.5%), trouble stepping onto a curb (8.4%), taking medicine for sleep or mood (6.0%), feeling sad or depressed (5.3%), and feeling unsteady (4.6%). Males reported a higher prevalence of losing feeling in feet (9.4%), ≥1 fall in the past year (8.1%), and using hands to stand up (4.4%). Compared to White older adults, Native American/Alaska Natives had the highest prevalence of fall history (43.8%), Hispanics had the highest prevalence of falls with injury (56.1%), and Hispanics and Blacks had a higher prevalence of reporting 11/12 Stay Independent Questionnaire risk factors. Conclusion: Older adults receiving outpatient rehabilitation have a high prevalence of fall risks, including falls and difficulties with strength, balance, or gait. Findings indicate that rehabilitation providers should perform screenings for these impairments, including incontinence and medication among females, loss of feeling in the feet among males, and all Stay Independent Questionnaire -related fall risk factors among Native American/Alaska Natives, Hispanics, and Blacks.


Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas , Autorrelato , Humanos , Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Fatores de Risco , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Prevalência , Fatores Sexuais , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Equilíbrio Postural , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Age Ageing ; 53(7)2024 Jul 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39051145

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is an imaging technique performed bedside. To date, few published studies have reported the usefulness of multiorgan POCUS in Geriatrics. The objective of this study was to describe the utility of multiorgan POCUS in the care of older adults admitted to geriatric care settings. METHODOLOGY: Observational retrospective study of patients admitted to geriatric settings in Spain and UK. Multiorgan POCUS was performed when there was a specific clinical suspicion or unexplained torpid clinical course despite physical examination and complementary tests. A geriatrician with a certificate degree in comprehensive ultrasound and long-standing experience in POCUS carried out POCUS. All patients underwent multiorgan POCUS in a cephalo-caudal manner. RESULTS: Out of 368 patients admitted to geriatric units, 29% met the inclusion criteria. Average age was 85.9 years (SD ± 6.1). POCUS identified 235 clinically significant findings (2.2 per patient). Findings were classified as 37.9% confirmed diagnosis, 16.6% ruled out diagnosis, 14.9% unsuspected relevant diagnoses and 30.6% clinical follow-ups. POCUS findings led to changes in pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment in 66.3 and 69.2% respectively, resulted in completion or avoidance of invasive procedures in 17.8 and 15.9%, respectively, facilitating early referrals to other specialities in 14.9% and avoiding transfers in 25.2% of patients. CONCLUSION: Multiorgan POCUS is a tool that aids in the assessment and treatment of patients receiving care in geriatrics units. These results show the usefulness of POCUS in the management of older adults and suggest its inclusion in any curriculum of Geriatric Medicine speciality training.


Assuntos
Ultrassonografia , Humanos , Espanha , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Masculino , Feminino , Reino Unido , Ultrassonografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Idoso , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Geriatria , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Fatores Etários , Testes Imediatos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/normas
4.
Geriatr Nurs ; 59: 223-227, 2024 Jul 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39053164

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Hip fracture is a common condition among older adults. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of nutritional status and comorbidity burden on changes in functionality, fall risk, and pain intensity one month after hip surgery in older adults with in-hospital rehabilitation. METHODS: Thirty-six hip fracture patients (55.6% female) aged 65 years or older with indication for surgical resolution were recruited. The main outcomes were functional independence (Barthel Index), risk of falls (Downton Falls Risk Index) and pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale), assessed preoperatively and one month after discharge. Covariates included age, sex, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and nutritional status (Mini Nutritional Assessment). For the inferential analysis, a one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was applied. RESULTS: Significant improvements were observed in functional independence (11.0 points, 95% CI: 1.7 to 20.3), risk of falls (-2.8 points, 95% CI: -4.0 to -1.7) and pain intensity (-2.6 points, 95% CI: -3.4 to -1.9). Among the covariates, a significant interaction was found between the CCI and improvements in functional independence (F=7.03, p=0.010, η2p=0.093), while nutritional status showed a significant interaction with pain reduction (F=5.65, p=0.020, η2p=0.075). CONCLUSION: A lower comorbidity burden was associated with greater postoperative functional independence, while better nutritional status was associated with a greater reduction in postoperative pain intensity.

5.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; : 105173, 2024 Jul 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39053890

RESUMO

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive cognitive and functional decline. Nearly all patients with AD develop neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs). Agitation is one of the most distressing and challenging NPS. Brexpiprazole is an oral antipsychotic and is the first approved pharmacologic agent in the United States for the treatment of agitation associated with dementia due to AD. Its effect is thought to be from its partial serotonin 5-HT1A and dopamine D2 receptor agonist activity and serotonin 5-HT2A receptor antagonism. Brexpiprazole is a maintenance medication, and it should not be used "as needed" or as a "PRN" treatment for breakthrough agitation. Brexpiprazole is a major substrate of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Dose adjustments may be required for drug interactions or impaired renal or hepatic function. Clinical trials found brexpiprazole 2 to 3 mg/d demonstrated significant improvements in agitation, with brexpiprazole showing an approximate 5-point greater reduction on change in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory total score at week 12 from baseline compared with placebo. Brexpiprazole is generally well tolerated and safe, and common adverse reactions when used for this indication include dizziness, headaches, insomnia, nasopharyngitis, somnolence, and urinary tract infections. Like other antipsychotics used for agitation in AD, brexpiprazole is associated with higher mortality rates compared with placebo. In a long-term care setting, there are several considerations for its use. Benefits include an oral agent that is well tolerated and clinical data showing statistically significant effects on agitation. However, brexpiprazole has not been studied in head-to-head clinical trials against other antipsychotics, and there are differing opinions if the agitation score reductions translate to a clinically meaningful difference. The approval of brexpiprazole signals favorably for upcoming agents for this indication, including escitalopram and dextromethorphan-bupropion. Both escitalopram and dextromethorphan-bupropion are currently undergoing clinical trials.

7.
Emerg Med J ; 2024 Jul 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39053972

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Older patients living with frailty have an increased risk for adverse events. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a 9-point frailty assessment instrument that has shown promise to identify frail emergency department (ED) patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between CFS scores and 30-day mortality in an ED setting when assessments are made by regular ED staff. METHOD: This was a prospective multicentre observational study carried out between May and November 2021 at three EDs in Sweden, where frailty via CFS is routinely assessed by ED staff. All patients ≥65 years of age were eligible for inclusion. Mortality at 7, 30 and 90 days, admission rate, ED and hospital length of stay (LOS) were compared between patients living with frailty (CFS≥5) and robust patients. Logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 1840 ED visits of patients aged ≥65 years with CFS assessments done during the study period were analysed, of which 606 (32.9%) were patients living with frailty. Mortality after the index visit was higher in patients living with frailty at 7 days (2.6% vs 0.2%), 30 days (7.9% vs 0.9%) and 90 days (15.5% vs 2.4%). Adjusted ORs for mortality for those with frailty compared with more robust patients were 9.9 (95% CI 2.1 to 46.5) for 7-day, 6.0 (95% CI 3.0 to 12.2) for 30-day and 5.7 (95% CI 3.6 to 9.1) 90-day mortality. Patients living with frailty had higher admission rates, 58% versus 36%, a difference of 22% (95% CI 17% to 26%), longer ED LOS, 5 hours:08 min versus 4 hours:36 min, a difference of 31 min (95% CI 14 to 50), and longer in-hospital LOS, 4.8 days versus 2.7 days, a difference of 2.2 days (95% CI 1.2 to 3.0). CONCLUSION: Patients living with frailty, had significantly higher mortality and admission rates as well as longer ED and in-hospital LOS compared with robust patients. The results confirm the capability of the CFS to risk stratify short-term mortality in older ED patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04877028.

8.
Emerg Med J ; 2024 Jul 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39060102

RESUMO

Older people living with frailty are frequent users of emergency care and have multiple and complex problems. Typical evidence-based guidelines and protocols provide guidance for the management of single and simple acute issues. Meanwhile, person-centred care orientates interventions around the perspectives of the individual. Using a case vignette, we illustrate the potential pitfalls of applying exclusively either evidence-based or person-centred care in isolation, as this may trigger inappropriate clinical processes or place undue onus on patients and families. We instead advocate for delivering a combined evidence-based, person-centred approach to healthcare which considers the person's situation and values, apparent problem and available options.

9.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 13: e56277, 2024 Jul 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39042875

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Potentially inappropriate medication remains a significant concern in general practices, particularly in the context of overactive bladder (OAB) treatment for individuals aged 65 years and older. This study focuses on the exploration of alternative options for treating OAB and the deprescribing of anticholinergic drugs commonly used in OAB. The research aims to comprehensively evaluate the efficiency of deprescribing through a mixed methods approach, combining quantitative assessment and qualitative exploration of perceptions, experiences, and potential barriers among patients and health care personnel. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the efficiency and safety of the intervention in which health care staff in primary care encourage patients to participate in deprescribing their drugs for OAB. In addition, we aim to identify factors contributing to or obstructing the deprescribing process that will drive more informed decisions in the field of deprescribing and support effective and safe treatment of patients. METHODS: The drugs for overactive bladder in primary care (DROP) study uses a rigorous research design, using a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with an embedded sequential explanatory mixed methods approach. All general practices within the North Denmark Region will be paired based on the number of general practitioners (GPs) and urban or rural locations. The matched pairs will be randomized into intervention and control groups. The intervention group will receive an algorithm designed to guide the deprescribing of drugs for OAB, promoting appropriate medication use. Quantitative data will be collected from the RCT including data from Danish registries for prescription analysis. Qualitative data will be obtained through interviews and focus groups with GPs, staff members, and patients. Finally, the quantitative and qualitative findings are merged to understand deprescribing for OAB comprehensively. This integrated approach enhances insights and supports future intervention improvement. RESULTS: The DROP study is currently in progress, with randomization of general practices underway. While they have not been invited to participate yet, they will be. The inclusion of GP practices is scheduled from December 2023 to April 2024. The follow-up period for each patient is 6 months. Results will be analyzed through an intention-to-treat analysis for the RCT and a thematic analysis for the qualitative component. Quantitative outcomes will focus on changes in prescriptions and symptoms, while the qualitative analysis will explore experiences and perceptions. CONCLUSIONS: The DROP study aims to provide an evidence-based intervention in primary care that ensures the deprescription of drugs for OAB when there is an unfavorable risk-benefit profile. The DROP study's contribution lies in generating evidence for deprescribing practices and influencing best practices in health care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06110975; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06110975. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/56277.


Assuntos
Desprescrições , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa , Humanos , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Feminino , Masculino , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Dinamarca
10.
Geriatr Nurs ; 59: 203-207, 2024 Jul 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39043047

RESUMO

THE PURPOSE: Of this study was to understand emergency nurses' use of frailty to inform care, disposition decision-making, and further assessment. METHODS: A qualitative, descriptive, exploratory approach was used. Field notes from group discussions held during a conference presession on frailty and post-session evaluation data were analyzed. RESULTS: Two common ideas threaded these discussions: frailty as vulnerability to "falling through the cracks" and that of an iceberg. Participants stressed the broad and expansive ramifications of frailty, and lack of structure/process to accurately describe, quantify, and utilize the concept. Participants described issues of physical and emotional/social fragility, including being unable to complete activities of daily living independently; also of concern were the patients' social determinants of health and financial challenges. CONCLUSION: The conceptual understanding of frailty encompassed physical, social, cognitive, and access deficits. Emergency nurses are aware of this concept and would conduct formal frailty screening if provided with training, time, and resources.

11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39043577

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Frailty, a state of increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes, has garnered significant attention in research and clinical practice. Existing constructs aggregate clinical features or health deficits into a single score. While simple and interpretable, this approach may overlook the complexity of frailty and not capture the full range of variation between individuals. METHODS: Exploratory factor analysis was used to infer latent dimensions of a frailty index constructed using survey data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, wave 9. The dataset included 58 self-reported health deficits in a representative sample of community-dwelling adults aged 65+ (N=4971). Deficits encompassed chronic disease, general health status, mobility, independence with activities of daily living, psychological well-being, memory and cognition. Multiple linear regression examined associations with CASP-19 quality of life scores. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed four frailty subdimensions. Based on the component deficits with the highest loading values, these factors were labelled 'mobility impairment and physical morbidity', 'difficulties in daily activities', 'mental health' and 'disorientation in time'. The four subdimensions were a better predictor of quality of life than frailty index scores. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct subdimensions of frailty can be identified from standard index scores. A decomposed approach to understanding frailty has a potential to provide a more nuanced understanding of an individual's state of health across multiple deficits.

12.
Int J Med Inform ; 190: 105535, 2024 Jul 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39047675

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Complexities in older patient care and frequent polypharmacy requires tailored tools, specific skills and interdisciplinary collaborations. Traditional disease-centered education often overlooks these issues. Despite digital gamification's relevance in health education, limited exploration exists for gamified platforms addressing polypharmacy, especially within comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). OBJECTIVE: This study outlines Optipharm's design, a gamified e-learning tool designed to enhance health students' education in managing polypharmacy among older adults. It also assesses its usability using a validated scale. METHODS: Optipharm development utilized gamification techniques guided by pedagogical principles. Learning objectives addressed clinical and educational gaps in older adult care. Hosted on a Moodle system, the platform housed a structured clinical case as a SCORM file, a usability scale, a certificate of achievement, and a literature library. Optipharm was assessed by 304 medical students from the University of Navarre, Spain, using the SUS-G-Sp scale. RESULTS: An immersive gamified e-learning tool simulating clinical practice settings was developed, requiring users to assume the role of healthcare professionals in multidisciplinary outpatient consultations. The interface, with a 2D cartoon-style aesthetic, aligns with learning objectives, integrating engaging storytelling and clear instructions for CGA in Phase 1 and pharmacological optimization in Phase 2. The evaluation of Optipharm's usability revealed very positive perceptions among users, with high agreement rates on usability items. CONCLUSION: Optipharm represents a pioneering gamified tool designed to simulate clinical scenarios, allowing users to engage as healthcare professionals within multidisciplinary teams and address medication-related challenges in older patients with polypharmacy. It provides a secure, interactive learning environment with clear educational objectives and seamless integration of gamification elements, enhancing users' knowledge and skills in managing complex medication regimens. As a platform for experiential learning and knowledge exchange, Optipharm contributes to shaping the future of health education and fostering a culture of patient-centred care among future healthcare professionals.

13.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1361420, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38978735

RESUMO

Introduction: Routine blood tests are prognostic tests for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. New drug regimens may produce a median overall survival of 2 years or more. Methods: This single practice, IRB-approved, phase II trial examines prognostic tests, Kaplan-Meier survival, and univariate Cox regression analyses. Eligibility requires: intent-to-treat; signed consent; advanced measurable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, with or without resistance to the test drugs; any adult age; performance status 0-2; and expected survival of ≥ 6 weeks. Biweekly treatment, with 1/3 of standard dosages in mg/M2, includes: Gemcitabine 500; 5-Fluorouracil 1200 over 24 hours; Leucovorin 180; Irinotecan 80; and on day 2, Oxaliplatin 40. On progression, drugs are added on day 2: first, Docetaxel 25 precedes Oxaliplatin, with or without Mitomycin C 6 after Oxaliplatin. The next sequential additions are day 1, Cetuximab 400 total mg, then 200 mg weekly, and then Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg is substituted for Cetuximab (FDA IND# 119005). Results: For 35 patients, 19 with 1-2 lines of prior therapy, resistant tumors, and 16 no prior therapy, survival at 24-months is ≥ 72 and ≥ 58%, respectively. For 14 patients aged ≥ 70 years, ≥ 63% survive 24 months, P = 0.28. Validated tests that predict ≤ 6-month survivals find median survival times of 17-months through > 2-years when compared to patients with favorable tests: Neutrophils lymphocyte ratio > 3.0, HR = 6.54, P < 6.4x10-3; absolute neutrophil count > 8000/µl, HR = 4.95, P < 6.5x10-3; serum albumin < 3.5 g/dl, HR = 4.10, P < 0.03; and lymphocyte monocyte ratio< 2.1, HR = 1.6, P = 0.50. Overall, the 76 (60-90)% of patients with 0-2 out of 4 high risk tests survive ≥ 24 months, (P = 7.1x10-3). Treatments produce neither hospitalization, neutropenic fever, severe enteritis, nor severe neuropathies. Conclusion: Two-year survival is replicable and predictable. Findings warrant phase III validation tests of sequential regimens, re-challenge with recombination, low dosages, and blood tests that are associated with lethal mechanisms that impair response and survival.

14.
Geriatr Nurs ; 59: 40-47, 2024 Jul 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986428

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The number of older adults in the U.S. living with ADRD is projected to increase dramatically by 2060. As older adults increasingly assume informal caregiving responsibilities, community-based intervention to sustain caregiver well-being is a dementia research priority. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of the RWSI among older ADRD caregivers. The RWSI is informed by the Neurovisceral Integration Model, in which memories that engage safety signals cultivate feelings of safety and well-being. METHODS: A within-subjects pre/post-intervention design with older ADRD caregivers to evaluate feasibility (acceptability, demand, fidelity) and empirical promise (well-being). RESULTS: The feasibility of the RWSI, implemented with fidelity, was strongly endorsed, as participants attended each intervention session, after which reported experiencing feelings of warmth and safeness, and provided the highest possible acceptability ratings. Participant narratives provided corroboration. DISCUSSION: Findings support the feasibility of the RWSI in older ADRD caregivers, providing the basis for continued research.

15.
Ann Geriatr Med Res ; 2024 Jul 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986675

RESUMO

Background: Data on cardiopulmonary fitness in older adults in the longer term after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are of interest as the time required for the full recovery of physical fitness after COVID-19 remains unclear. Some studies have reported that patients do not recover physical fitness for up to 6 or 12 months after COVID-19, whereas other studies have observed full recovery after 12-months. Therefore, this study evaluated and compared the cardiopulmonary responses induced by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and 1-minute sit-to-stand-test (STST) results at 3, 6, and 12 months in older adults with and without COVID-19. Methods: This study included 59 older adults with and without a history of COVID-19. The cardiopulmonary response parameters including heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse oxygen saturation (O2 sat), rate of perceived exertion (RPE), and leg fatigue were evaluated in the participants after 6MWT and 1-min-STST assessments. Results: Post-COVID-19, older adults showed statistically significant differences in HR, SBP, DBP, O2 sat, RPE, leg fatigue, 6MWT time, and 1-min-STST step numbers at 3, 6, and 12 months (P < 0.001). Moreover, older adults showed statistically significant differences in HR, SBP, DBP, RPE, leg fatigue, O2 sat, and 6MWT distance at 3 months post-COVID-19 compared with those in older adults without COVID-19 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: While older adults showed recovery of cardiopulmonary response parameters according to 6MWT and 1-min-STST findings at the 12-month follow-up post-COVID-19, these results of these measurements did not return to the values observed in older adults without COVID-19.

16.
J Clin Med ; 13(13)2024 Jun 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38999306

RESUMO

Background/Objective: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a common healthcare-associated ailment, presenting major health and economic challenges, especially for the elderly. Despite its prevalence, comprehensive data about CDI's impact on the elderly are limited. Methods: This study used the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 data to analyze CDI trends from 2000 to 2019, considering factors like sex, region, and sociodemographic index (SDI). Results: This study revealed that CDI caused approximately 18,181 deaths and 252,709 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) among the elderly worldwide. The Americas showed the highest CDI burden, while the Eastern Mediterranean saw the steepest rate increase from 2000 to 2019. Regions with a high SDI also displayed substantial CDI impact. Conclusions: The escalating burden of CDI in the elderly, especially in high-SDI areas and the Americas, emphasizes an urgent need for targeted public health strategies.

17.
J Palliat Med ; 2024 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39008410

RESUMO

In this report, we present the case of an older adult with severe obesity and multiple comorbidities, including heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), who experienced a prolonged decline complicated by recurrent hospitalizations and skilled nursing facility stays during the two years preceding death. This case highlights challenges in prognostication attributed to severe obesity complicated by HFpEF, which likely delayed goals of care conversations, and access to palliative care and hospice, despite high symptom burden. We discuss prognostic uncertainty among those with severe obesity and outline potential future directions.

18.
Cureus ; 16(6): e62838, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39036197

RESUMO

Congestive heart failure (CHF) and cognitive impairment (CI) are common in older age and often occur together. However, CI is often unrecognized leading to more hospitalizations and increased morbidity and mortality in patients with co-occurring CHF and CI. Universal screening can help identify these patients earlier and the use of the Institute of Healthcare Improvement's (IHI) 4Ms Framework (i.e. "What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility") can serve as a tool for providers to meet patients' needs surrounding goals of care, medication regimens, mental and emotional well-being, and mobility capabilities through a social determinants of health lens. Providers should engage in serious illness conversations early to honor patient preferences, reduce polypharmacy, use a validated instrument to assess cognition such as the Mini-Cog or Functional Activities Questionnaire, and assess the need for assistance completing activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Consultation with social work is highly recommended given the complexity of the medical and social needs of newly discharged cognitively impaired CHF patients and the need to optimize the use of all available community resources.

19.
JMIR Form Res ; 8: e51400, 2024 Jul 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39038282

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A growing body of research has examined lifestyle-based interventions for dementia prevention. Specifically, health coaching interventions have been linked to decreased risk of Alzheimer disease (AD) comorbidities, such as diabetes. Despite the association, there is a lack of research examining the efficacy and perception of digital health coaching on reducing AD risk. Understanding the perceived benefits of participating in a digital health coach program is critical to ensure long-term use, including participant adherence and engagement. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine the initial attitudes toward a digital health coaching intervention aimed at preventing cognitive decline among at-risk, rural participants. METHODS: This exploratory qualitative study is part of the ongoing Digital Cognitive Multidomain Alzheimer Risk Velocity Study (DC-MARVel; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04559789), a 2-year randomized control trial examining the effects of a digital health coaching intervention on dementia risk, cognitive decline, and general health outcomes. Participants were recruited from the northwest region of Arkansas via word of mouth, email, local radio, and social media. At the time of the analysis, 103 participants randomly assigned to the health coaching group completed an average of 4 coaching sessions over a 4-month period. The intervention included asynchronous messages 1-2 times per week from their health coach that contained health education articles based on the participant's goals (eg, increase physical activity), unlimited access to their coach for questions and recommendations, and monthly meetings with their coach via videoconference or phone to discuss their goals. Participants were asked 2 open-ended questions, "What were your top 1 or 2 takeaways from your recent Health Coaching session?" and "Is there anything you would change about our Health Coaching sessions?" A thematic analysis was conducted using feedback responses from 80 participants (mean age, SD 7.6 years). RESULTS: The following four themes emerged from participants' feedback: (1) healthy lifestyle and behavioral changes, (2) a sense of self-awareness through introspection, (3) value in coach support, and (4) a desire for a change in program format (eg, frequency). In total, 93% (n=74) of participants expressed that the intervention needed no changes. CONCLUSIONS: Initial participation in the digital cognitive health coaching intervention was well received, as evidenced by participants reporting value in goal setting and strategies for healthy lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as self-reflection on their personal lifestyle choices. Feedback about their assigned coach also offers insight into the importance of the coach-participant relationship and may serve as a significant factor in overall participant success. Given the exploratory nature of this study, more robust research is needed to elicit more information from participants about their experiences to fully understand the acceptability of the digital health coaching intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04559789; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04559789. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/31841.

20.
Mol Aspects Med ; 98: 101291, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38954948

RESUMO

Frailty and Biological Age are two closely related concepts; however, frailty is a multisystem geriatric syndrome that applies to elderly subjects, whereas biological age is a gerontologic way to describe the rate of aging of each individual, which can be used from the beginning of the aging process, in adulthood. If frailty reaches less consensus on the definition, it is a term much more widely used than this of biological age, which shows a clearer definition but is scarcely employed in social and medical fields. In this review, we suggest that this Biological Age is the best to describe how we are aging and determine our longevity, and several examples support our proposal.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Fragilidade , Longevidade , Humanos , Idoso
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA