Effects of a Dietary Supplement Composed of Baicalin, Bromelain and Escin for Venous Chronic Insufficiency Treatment: Insights from a Retrospective Observational Study.

Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) represents a risk factor for cardiovascular events. The first-line treatment includes the use of compression stockings and lifestyle changes. Natural products, such as flavonoids, could be used to improve the effects of compression therapy due to their anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties. This study aims to evaluate the effects of a dietary supplement containing baicalin, bromeline and escin in CVI patients. A retrospective cohort study was performed by using the medical records of CVI affected outpatients. Patients treated with the dietary supplement were defined as "users". A modified Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) was calculated, including pain, inflammation, vessels induration and skin pigmentation. All clinical variables were evaluated at baseline (T0), after 30 (T1) and 90(T2) days in "users" and "non-users". Out of 62 patients, 30 (48.4%) were "users". No difference was observed between groups at baseline. A lower VCSS value was recorded in "users" than that observed in "non-users" at T2 (7.0 (4.0-9.0) vs. 9.0 (5.0-10.0); p = 0.025). Vessels' induration and pain significantly reduced in 53.3% and 43.3% of "users" and in 18.8% and 9.4% of "non-users". Only "users" (33.3%) showed a reduction of the inflammatory signs as well as a decrease in malleolar circumference, from 29.0 (26.5-30.0) to 27.5 (26.0-28.5) (p < 000.1). A reduction of C-reactive Protein levels was found in "users" compared to "non-users" at T2 (1.0 (0.9-1.2) vs. 1.3 (1.0-1.5); p = 0.006). These findings suggest that implementation of a dietary supplement could improve the clinical outcomes of CVI patients.

Evaluation of Elastic Venous Compression Device dispensation in pregnant and post-partum women using the French National Health Insurance Claims Database: The ProFIL retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the real-world use of Elastic Venous Compression Devices (EVCDs) during pregnancy and post-partum using data from a representative subset of the French National Health Insurance Claims Database (the Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires, EGB). STUDY DESIGN: Women aged 15-49 who were pregnant between 1st July 2017 and 15th June 2018 were identified in the EGB using pregnancy-specific acts (certain prenatal examinations or deliveries). Subgroups were defined by age, presence of Venous Thrombo-Embolism (VTE) risk factors, history of VTE, delivery type and time period. EVCD dispensations (format, prescriber, and date) were identified among those for "standard orthotics" using their unique reimbursement tariffs. Dispensation rates were computed for all subgroups, overall and by format and were compared. RESULTS: 15,528 pregnant women were included: 7,252 [46.7 %] deliveries (5,796 vaginal [79.9 %], 482 planned cesarean sections (C-sections) [6.7 %] and 974 unplanned C-Sections [13.4 %]), 2,734 (17.6 %) terminations and 5,542 (35.7 %) unknown outcomes. Overall, 4,919 (31.7 %) women were dispensed at least one EVCD. Ante-partum dispensation occurred in 43.1 % (n = 3,122) of women whose pregnancy led to a delivery. Dispensation rates were 17.3 % (n = 1,005), 46.7 % (n = 225) and 44.1 % (n = 430) after vaginal delivery, planned C-sections or unplanned C-sections, respectively. Overall, dispensation rates significantly increased with age, the presence of VTE risk factors, and a history of VTE (p < 0.01). EVCD dispensation was most frequent (17.0 %) during the 5th month of pregnancy. Among pregnant women who were dispensed at least one EVCD during ante- or post-partum, 69.0 % had one or two units of compression (27.1 % [one unit], 41.9 % [two units]). Stockings (48.6 %, n = 6,038) were dispensed significantly more frequently than socks (36.9 %, n = 4,586) and tights (14.5 %, n = 1,806) (p < 0.01). The main contributors to mechanical VTE prophylaxis were gynecologists (26.3 % of dispensations, n = 2,280), general practitioners (20.2 %, n = 1,749) and midwives (15.1 %, n = 1,314). CONCLUSIONS: Low observed dispensation rates highlight a discrepancy between the French National Authority for Health (Haute Autorité de Santé, HAS), recommending EVCDs use during pregnancy and after delivery, and the real-life use of EVCD. Prescription sensitization combined with targeted information campaigns for pregnant women would be beneficial to contribute to the prevention of VTE, a health problem for pregnant women.

Preventing lower limb lymphedema after pelvic lymphadenectomy with progressive resistance exercise training: A randomized controlled trial.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a self-designed progressive resistance exercise training program for preventing the development of lower limb lymphedema. Methods: An open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients who underwent radical surgery for cervical cancer treatment in our department between October 7, 2019, and October 7, 2021. The participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: progressive resistance exercise training, graduated compression stocking, and control group. Results: A total of 267 patients were enrolled (89 in each group). The incidence of lower limb lymphedema was 9.0% (n = 8) in the progressive resistance exercise training group, 28.1% (n = 25) in the graduated compression stocking group, and 42.7% (n = 38) in the control group. Over the 2-year follow-up period, the risk of lower limb lymphedema was significantly lower in the progressive resistance exercise training group than in the control group, with a hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 0.156 (0.073-0.335). The study was underpowered to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in risk in the graduated compression stocking group, with an HR (95% CI) of 0.624 (0.376-1.033). Conclusions: Progressive resistance exercise training is an effective strategy for preventing lower limb lymphedema after pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. It imposes no additional economic burden and can be performed conveniently without the need for dedicated exercise facilities. This makes it particularly accessible to patients in developing countries, allowing them to exercise at their convenience. Trial registration: ChiCTR1800014905.

A systematic review of venous thromboembolism mechanical prophylaxis devices during surgery.

PURPOSE: Hospitalisation and surgery are major risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) and graduated compression stockings (GCS) are common mechanical prophylaxis devices used to prevent VTE. This review compares the safety and efficacy of IPC and GCS used singularly and in combination for surgical patients. METHODS: Ovid Medline and Pubmed were searched in a systematic review of the literature, and relevant articles were assessed against eligibility criteria for inclusion along PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: This review is a narrative description and critical analysis of available evidence. Fourteen articles were included in this review after meeting the criteria. Results of seven studies comparing the efficacy of IPC versus GCS had high heterogeneity but overall suggested IPC was superior to GCS. A further seven studies compared the combination of IPC and GCS versus GCS alone, the results of which suggest that combination mechanical prophylaxis may be superior to GCS alone in high-risk patients. No studies compared combination therapy to IPC alone. IPC appeared to have a superior safety profile, although it had a worse compliance rate and the quality of evidence was poor. The addition of pharmacological prophylaxis may make mechanical prophylaxis superfluous in the post-operative setting. CONCLUSION: IPC may be superior to GCS when used as a single prophylactic device. A combination of IPC and GCS may be more efficacious than GCS alone for high-risk patients. Further high-quality research is needed focusing on clinical relevance, safety and comparing combination mechanical prophylaxis to IPC alone, particularly in high-risk surgical settings when pharmacological prophylaxis is contraindicated.

Development and validation of a graduated compression stockings adherence scale.

OBJECTIVE: Compression therapy with the use of graduated compression stockings (GCSs) is a common treatment strategy for chronic venous disease (CVD). However, there is no uniform and objective standard to assess adherence to the use of GCSs. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a GCS Compliance Scale (GCSAS) to fill gaps in internationally recognized comprehensive scales and provide a useful tool for future research. METHODS: The items included in the GCSAS were based on a review of the literature and open-ended interviews with experts, who screened the initial items using an item-level content validity index. Then, pilot tests were conducted three times with 50 participants. After exclusion of redundant and cross-loading items by exploratory factor analysis, 290 subjects were recruited to evaluate the reliability and validity of the proposed GCSAS. Analyses included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, split-half reliability, construct validity, criterion validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. RESULTS: The final GCSAS consisted of 17 items and 5 dimensions. The results of the exploratory factor analysis indicated that the variances of each factor explained were 22.03%, 14.85%, 14.74%, 14.16%, and 13.35%, and all 5 factors explained 79.13% of the variance among the 17 items. The factor loadings of all items were >0.7. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the indices were adequate. A significant positive correlation was found between the GCSAS and the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study - Quality of Life questionnaire scores (r = 0.76, p < 0.001). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.90, test-retest reliability was 0.81, and split-half reliability was 0.92. CONCLUSIONS: The GCSAS showed good validity and reliability to assess compliance with the use of GCSs among patients with CVD.

An Overview of Specific Considerations in Chronic Venous Disease and Iliofemoral Venous Stenting.

Unlike arterial disease, chronic venous disease (CVD) is rarely life-threatening or limb-threatening. However, it can impose substantial morbidity on patients by influencing their lifestyle and quality of life (QoL). The aim of this nonsystematic narrative review is to provide an overview of the most recent information on the management of CVD and specifically, iliofemoral venous stenting in the context of personalized considerations for specific patient populations. The philosophy of treating CVD and phases of endovenous iliac stenting are also described in this review. Additionally, the use of intravascular ultrasound is described as the preferred operative diagnostic procedural tool for iliofemoral venous stent placement.

Measuring patient compliance with wearing graduated compression stockings.

BACKGROUND: Patient compliance is an essential precondition for assessing the effectiveness of graduated compression stockings (GCS). However, patient compliance with use of GCS has not received sufficient attention. Only a few clinical studies have explicitly evaluated patients' adherence to GCS therapy, and the instruments used to measure patient compliance have either not been well adapted to daily use or lacked scientific development techniques. Most instruments have focused on "wear or not wear" or "how long did you wear" questions, which do not consider all the perspectives on patient compliance. In the present study, we used scale development and validation steps to create a self-reported questionnaire to measure patients' compliance with wearing GCS. METHODS: We designed a questionnaire to measure compliance with wearing GCS among patients who had undergone invasive treatment of superficial varicose veins of the lower extremities. The initial questions were determined after a literature review and interviews with experts and patients. Reliability was evaluated using the Delphi method with expert judges, pretesting, Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the questionnaire's validity. RESULTS: The developed questionnaire had 11 questions with the responses rated from 1 to 4 and included three factors: compliance with correct GCS wearing methods, compliance with GCS wearing cautions, and compliance with seeking advice. The Cronbach alpha for the overall questionnaire was 0.853 (factor 1, 0.934; factor 2, 0.803; factor 3, 0.789), its content validity was good, and the factor structure fitted the data well. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented our initial version of the questionnaire for patients who have undergone invasive treatment of superficial varicose veins of the lower extremities. The questionnaire can be used to evaluate patient compliance with wearing GCS thoroughly and effectively. However, further work is still required to maximize its reliability and validity for its use in daily practice in the future.

Thigh-length graduated compression stocking cannot increase blood velocity of the common femoral vein in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVES: Graduated compression stocking (GCS) is one of the mechanical prophylaxes commonly used for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The present study was designed to observe the effects of graduated compression stockings on the vein deformation and hemodynamics of lower limbs in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: The lower extremity veins of 22 patients awaiting THA were examined by ultrasound, when they rested in supine position with or without thigh-length GCS. The deformation parameters we measured included antero-posterior (AP) diameters, latero-medial (LM) diameters, and cross-sectional area (CSA) of great saphenous vein (GSV), posterior tibial vein (PTV), popliteal vein (PV), gastrocnemius vein (GV), and superficial femoral vein (SFV). We measured peak velocity and mean velocity of GSV, common femoral vein (CFV), junction of GSV and CFV to represent for hemodynamics of veins. RESULTS: Significant compression was observed in almost all measured veins with the use of thigh-length GCS, while it was unable to significantly compress GSV in latero-medial diameter. The mean latero-medial diameter reductions for GSV, PTV, GV, PV and SFV were 19.4, 30.2, 43.2, 29.7 and 20.4%, respectively. GCS significantly compressed antero-posterior diameter of GSV, PTV, GV, PV and SFV by 43.4, 33.3, 42.1, 37.5, and 27.8%, respectively. The mean reduction of cross-section area was 44.8% for GSV, 49.6% for PTV, 60.0% for GV, 57.4% for PV, and 36.2% for FV. No significant changes were observed in the mean blood velocity of GSV, CFV, and junction. GCS was able to significantly reduce peak velocity of CFV (17.6 ± 5.6 cm/s to 16.1 ± 6.0 cm/s) and junction (23.3 ± 9.5 cm/s to 21.3 ± 9.7 cm/s), while it did not change the peak velocity of GSV. CONCLUSION: Thigh-length GCS is sufficient to compress lower extremity veins in patients awaiting THA in supine position with the greatest compression in GV, while it was unable to significantly increase blood velocity of common femoral vein or GSV. GCS may prevent DVT through more than simply increasing blood flow. Further studies are needed to determine the specific effects of GCS.

The changes of the calf-vein deformation and femoral vein peak velocity during ankle pump exercise with or without graduated compression stockings.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the changes of lower limb hemodynamics parameters before and after wearing graduated compression stockings (GCS) during ankle pump exercise in patients preparing for arthroplastic surgery. METHOD: The leg veins of 16 patients awaiting arthroplasty were analyzed using a Sonosite M-Turbo ultrasound system during ankle pump exercise with or without GCS. The age of them was 70 ± 7 years (mean ± SD) (range 56-82 years) and body mass index was 25.8 ± 3.0 kg/m2 (range 18.0-30.5 kg/m2). Measured data including the cross-sectional area (CSA), anteroposterior (AP) diameter and lateromedial (LM) diameter of the soleus vein (SV), posterior tibial vein (PTV) and great saphenous vein (GSV). Additionally, the peak velocities of femoral vein (FV) were also measured. RESULTS: GCS could significantly decrease the cross-sectional area of SV, PTV and GSV in supine position at rest and maximum ankle plantar flexion. But the compression effect of GCS to SV and GSV was not observed during maximum ankle dorsiflexion. It was found that GCS application reduced the peak flow velocity of the femoral vein from 61.85 cm/s (95% CI = 50.94-72.75 cm/s) to 38.01 cm/s (95% CI = 28.42-47.59 cm/s) (P < 0.001) during ankle plantar flexion and decreased the femoral vein in these patients from 80.65 cm/s (95% CI = 70.37-90.92 cm/s) to 51.15 cm/s (95% CI = 42.58-59.73 cm/s) (P < 0.001) during ankle dorsiflexion. But this effect was not significant in supine position at rest. CONCLUSIONS: GCS could significantly reduce the peak flow velocity of the femoral vein during ankle pump exercise in the patients preparing for arthroplastic surgery.

Exploration of Effects of Graduated Compression Stocking Structures on Performance Properties Using Principal Component Analysis: A Promising Method for Simultaneous Optimization of Properties.

This paper focuses on the comfort properties of graduated and preventive compression stockings for people who work long hours in standing postures and for athletes for proper blood circulation. The present study was conducted in order to investigate the effects of the yarn insertion density and inlaid stitches on the performance of the compression stockings. The effects of these parameters on the thermo-physiological comfort properties were tested with standard and developed methods of testing. All compression stockings were maintained with class 1 pressure as per German standards. The structural parameters of the knitted fabric structures were investigated. The stretching and recovery properties were also investigated to determine the performance properties. The theoretical pressure was predicated using the Laplace's law by testing the stockings' tensile properties. The compression interface pressures of all stockings were also investigated using a medical stocking tester (MST) from Salzmann AG, St. Gallen, Switzerland. Correlation between the theoretical pressures and pressures measured using the MST system were also assessed. The current research used a multi-response optimization technique, i.e., principal component analysis (PCA), to identify the best structure based on the optimalization of the above-mentioned properties. The results also revealed that samples with higher insertion density levels exhibit better comfort properties. The results showed that sample R1 was the best sample, followed by R2 and P. In addition, all developed stocking samples exhibited better comfort properties than the control sample from the market.

Implementation of the graduated compression as an adjunct to pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis in surgery trial results across the UK.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine uptake and dissemination of a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA)-funded trial - Graduated compression as an Adjunct to Pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis in Surgery (GAPS) (project number: 14/140/61) amongst health professionals in the UK. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the trial on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention policies 7 months after publication. METHOD: A 12-question online survey emailed to 2750 individuals via several vascular societies, 34 VTE Exemplar Centre leads and 1 charity over a 3-month period. RESULTS: In total, 250 responses were received; a 9.1% response rate. Over half of all respondents (52.4%) had read the GAPS trial results prior to completing the survey. Precisely, 77.1% said their hospital had not yet made changes or did not intend to make changes to local hospital VTE policy based on the GAPS trial. CONCLUSIONS: Findings must be interpreted in the context of the low response rate. Further in-depth interviews would aid understanding of barriers to implementing change.

The impact of graduated compression stockings on calf-vein deformation and blood velocity in patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to explore venous deformation of the lower extremities and the changes in venous hemodynamics in supine position before and after wearing graduated elastic stockings in patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHOD: The leg veins of 21 elderly patients awaiting TKA were imaged in the supine position with and without knee-length graduated compression stockings (GCS) according to a fixed protocol. Measured parameters including the lateromedial (LM) diameter, anteroposterior (AP) diameter, and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV), gastrocnemius vein (GV), soleus vein (SV), posterior tibial vein (PTV), fibular vein (FV), and anterior tibial vein (ATV). In addition, the mean and maximum velocities of the popliteal vein (PV) and superficial femoral vein (FSV) were measured. RESULTS: GCS-related compression was observed for all the measured veins. Maximal reduction was observed for the GV and SV, whereas the GSV exhibited the lowest degree of GCS-related compression. The mean cross-sectional area reduction values associated with GCS were 33.1 ± 41.2 % for the GSV, 94.8 ± 11.1 % for the GV, and 85.6 ± 20.3 % for the SV, while the mean reduction of anteroposterior diameter was 18.1 ± 34.5 % for the GSV, 89.0 ± 22.5 % for the GV, and 72.9 ± 35.1 % for the SV, and the mean reduction of the lateromedial diameter was 25.9 ± 36.4 % for the GSV, 89.6 ± 19.6 % for the GV, 78.2 ± 28.3 % for the SV. No significant GCS-related changes in blood velocity in the superficial femoral veins or popliteal veins were detected. CONCLUSIONS: For elderly patients awaiting TKA, knee-length GCS can significantly reduce calf vein dilation while at rest in the supine position, with the greatest reductions being observed for the soleus and gastrocnemius veins. These data might help provide a theoretical basis for the GCS in reducing incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing TKA.

Systematic review on the benefit of graduated compression stockings in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in low-risk surgical patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review is to assess the performance of graduated compression stockings (GCS) in comparison to no venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in the prevention of hospital-acquired thrombosis in low-risk surgical patients undergoing short-stay procedures. METHODS: Aligning with PRISMA guidelines, online databases MEDLINE and EMBASE, Cochrane Library® and trial registries were searched. Eligible articles reported the VTE rate in low-risk surgical patients either receiving GCS or no VTE prophylaxis. RESULTS: Narrative synthesis was performed on a single eligible article. The included study arm consisted of participants undergoing knee arthroscopy with the use of GCS alone reporting a total of 29 VTE events (4.4%), 16 of which were asymptomatic DVTs (2.4%). CONCLUSION: There is a complete lack of evidence to support the use of GCS in the prevention of HAT for low-risk surgical patients. An adequately powered trial is required to provide level-IA evidence to support this practice.

Compression stockings in addition to low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent venous thromboembolism in surgical inpatients requiring pharmacoprophylaxis: the GAPS non-inferiority RCT.

BACKGROUND: Patients admitted to hospital for surgery are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis and mechanical prophylaxis (usually graduated compression stockings or intermittent pneumatic compression) have been shown to reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism. The evidence base supporting the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's recommendation for the use of graduated compression stockings for venous thromboembolism prevention in the UK has recently been challenged. It is unclear if the risks and costs associated with graduated compression stockings are justified for deep-vein thrombosis prevention in moderate- and high-risk elective surgical inpatients receiving low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the venous thromboembolism rate in elective surgical inpatients at moderate or high risk of venous thromboembolism who were receiving either graduated compression stockings and low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (standard care) or low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin alone (intervention). DESIGN: This was a pragmatic, multicentre, prospective, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: This took place in secondary care NHS hospitals in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥ 18 years who were assessed to be at moderate or high risk of venous thromboembolism according to the NHS England venous thromboembolism risk assessment tool (or the trust equivalent based on this form) and who were not contraindicated to low-molecular-weight heparin or graduated compression stockings were deemed eligible to take part. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised 1 : 1 to either low-molecular-weight heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin and graduated compression stockings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism up to 90 days after surgery. A combined end point of duplex ultrasound-proven new lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis (symptomatic or asymptomatic) plus imaging-confirmed symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, compliance with graduated compression stockings and low-molecular-weight heparin during admission, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1905 participants were randomised and 1858 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. A primary outcome event occurred in 16 out of 937 (1.7%) patients in the low-molecular-weight heparin-alone arm compared with 13 out of 921 (1.4%) patients in the low-molecular-weight heparin plus graduated compression stockings arm. The risk difference between low-molecular-weight heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin plus graduated compression stockings was 0.30% (95% confidence interval -0.65% to 1.26%). As the 95% confidence interval did not cross the non-inferiority margin of 3.5% (p < 0.001 for non-inferiority), the results indicate that non-inferiority of low-molecular-weight heparin alone was shown. LIMITATIONS: In total, 13% of patients did not receive a duplex ultrasound scan that could have detected further asymptomatic deep-vein thrombosis. However, missing scans were balanced between both trial arms. The subpopulation of those aged ≥ 65 years assessed as being at a moderate risk of venous thromboembolism was under-represented in the study; however, this reflects that this group is under-represented in the general population. CONCLUSIONS: For elective surgical patients at moderate or high risk of venous thromboembolism, administration of pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis alone is non-inferior to a combination of pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis and graduated compression stockings. These findings indicate that graduated compression stockings may be unnecessary for most elective surgical patients. FUTURE WORK: Further studies are required to evaluate whether or not adjuvant graduated compression stockings have a role in patients receiving extended thromboprophylaxis, beyond the period of hospital admission, following elective surgery or in patients undergoing emergency surgical procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13911492. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 69. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

WHY DID WE CONDUCT THIS RESEARCH?: People undergoing operations are at risk of developing blood clots in their legs, which is known as a deep-vein thrombosis. Blood clots occur for several reasons, such as not being able to move around after an operation, changes in the blood or damage to the veins in which blood travels. To decrease the risk of getting deep-vein thrombosis, patients having operations are given tight elastic socks to wear called graduated compression stockings. They are also given blood thinning medicine to prevent clotting. There is little evidence that wearing elastic socks in hospital will reduce the risk of blood clots if blood thinners are also given. Many patients say that the socks can hurt or cause bruising and can be difficult to put on. The graduated compression as an adjunct to thromboprophylaxis in surgery (GAPS) trial investigated whether or not patients having an operation would benefit from wearing elastic socks as well as getting blood thinners, or if blood thinners on their own prevented blood clots. WHAT DID WE DO?: A total of 1905 patients who were having operations at seven hospitals in England agreed to take part. They were randomly assigned to different treatments by a computer program. Half of the patients were given elastic socks plus blood thinners, and the other half were given the blood thinners alone. WHAT DID WE FIND?: There was no significant difference in the number of people who had a blood clot in either study group. This could mean that blood thinners are as good at stopping blood clots as blood thinners and elastic socks for patients having operations. WHAT COULD BE CARRIED OUT NEXT?: The NHS spends around £63M per year across England on elastic stockings. This research indicates that patients might not get extra benefit from wearing them if they have taken blood thinners.

Healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding graduated compression stockings: a survey of China's big-data network.

BACKGROUND: The accurate identification of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis implementation barriers is an important part of prophylaxis prevention. However, in China, data to help identify these barriers is limited. This study has two objectives: 1) to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) of healthcare professionals regarding graduated compression stockings (GCS) since the launch of the National Program for the Prevention and Management of Pulmonary Embolism (PE) and Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) in October 2018 and 2) to identify the obstacles and assist the program. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 5070 healthcare professionals in China. We used exploratory factor and reliability analyses to evaluate the researcher-designed questionnaire's reliability and validity. The formal questionnaire, which included demographic data, knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice patterns, was distributed to healthcare professionals. RESULTS: Of the 5070 respondents, 32.5% had a good knowledge of GCS, 78.5% had a positive attitude towards their use, and 34.0% exhibited normative behavior when applying them. The KAPs of healthcare professionals towards GCS were significantly correlated with one another. Binary logistic regression suggested that the training received by healthcare professionals was an important factor affecting their knowledge regarding GCS usage. CONCLUSIONS: The training provided for the use of GCS in China cannot meet medical staff needs and deserves more attention from policy makers. This represents an obstacle for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, which restricts the effective implementation of the National Program for Prevention and Management of PE and DVT.

Effects of graduated compression stockings, local vibration and their combination on popliteal venous blood velocity.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this pilot study was to examine and compare the effects of graduated compression stockings, local vibration, and combined graduated compression stockings and local vibration on popliteal venous blood velocity. METHOD: Twenty-four healthy subjects received four 15 min interventions (control, graduated compression stockings alone, local vibration alone, and combined graduated compression stockings and local vibration), while resting inactive in the prone position. Popliteal vein blood velocity was investigated before (PRE) and at the end (POST) of each intervention using Doppler ultrasound. RESULTS: At POST, peak velocity was reported to be 26.3 ± 53.5% (p < 0.05) greater for local vibration than control (CONT). Peak velocity was 46.2 ± 54.6% (p < 0.001) and 21.1 ± 37.6% (p < 0.01) higher for graduated compression stockings than CONT and local vibration, respectively. Graduated compression stockings + local vibration presented 64.1 ± 58.0% (p < 0.001), 38.4 ± 52.4% (p < 0.001) and 15.0 ± 31.6% (p < 0.05) greater values than CONT, local vibration and graduated compression stockings, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated an increase in popliteal venous blood velocity after graduated compression stockings and local vibration application. Their combination provided the greatest effects.

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of healthcare professionals toward clinically applying graduated compression stockings: results of a Chinese web-based survey.

This study had three objectives: (1) to investigate healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitude, and practice toward clinically applying graduated compression stockings, (2) to analyze the influencing factors, and (3) to provide data to support departments that develop health policies. A self-administered web-based survey was completed by 1,444 healthcare professionals, including physicians and nurses from 15tertiary hospitals and four secondary hospitals from 10 provinces in China. Reliability analysis and exploratory factor analysis were used to evaluate the researcher-designed questionnaire's reliability and validity. The formal questionnaire, which included demographic data (eight items), knowledge (ten items), attitudes (four items), and clinical practice patterns (six items), was distributed among healthcare professionals. The relationships and mechanisms among the variables were explored using descriptive statistical analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and multiple linear regression analysis. Of the 1,444 respondents, 31.2% had good knowledge of clinically applying graduated compression stockings, 83.5% had a positive attitude toward clinically applying them, and 30.4% of respondents exhibited normative behavior when applying them. The multiple linear regression analysis indicated that training was an important factor influencing the knowledge, attitude, and practice toward clinically applying graduated compression stockings. The healthcare professionals' attitude toward clinically applying graduated compression stockings was positive, but the related knowledge was poor, and the code of behavior was deficient. Medical institutions should improve training for clinically applying graduated compression stockings among healthcare professionals and standardize the use of graduated compression stockings to facilitate the prevention of hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism.

The effectiveness of graduated compression stockings for prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopedic and abdominal surgery patients requiring extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: There is an increasing evidence base to support the use of extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in selected surgical patients to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE). The benefit of graduated compression stockings (GCS) in addition to extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is unclear. The aim of this study was to systematically review the evidence relating to the effectiveness of using GCS in conjunction with extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis to prevent VTE in surgical patients. METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in April 2017. The review protocol was published on PROSPERO (CRD42017062655). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible if one of the study arms included patients receiving extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis alone (>21 days) or in conjunction with GCS. Data on deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and VTE-related death were compiled. Pooled proportions of the VTE rates were determined using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: The systematic search identified 1291 studies, of which 19 studies were eligible for inclusion. No RCT directly compared extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis alone with GCS plus extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. A total of 9824 patients from 16 RCTs were treated with extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, of whom 0.81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-1.20) were diagnosed with symptomatic DVT and 0.2% (95% CI, 0.12-0.36) with PE. Three trials included 337 patients who received extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in conjunction with GCS. In this group, 1.61% (95% CI, 0.03-5.43) had symptomatic DVT with no reported PE. Similar VTE rates were observed when studies in orthopedic and abdominal surgery were analyzed separately. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to recommend GCS in conjunction with extended pharmacologic prophylaxis to prevent VTE in patients undergoing orthopedic and abdominal surgery. A clinical trial directly investigating this important subject is needed.

Semiautomatic intermittent pneumatic compression device applied to deep vein thrombosis in major orthopedic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of additional semiautomatic intermittent pneumatic compression device (IPCD) in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremity in these patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, when compared with the conventional graduated compression stockings alone. METHODS: The data of 112 patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery were retrospectively analyzed. 51 patients who ever received IPCD and graduated compression stockings during major orthopedic surgery were taken as the experimental group, and 61 patients who only received the conventional graduated compression stockings during surgery were taken as the observation group. The Doppler sonography was utilized to detect the presence of DVT and pulmonary embolism pre- and postoperatively. Besides, the mean and peak velocity of blood flow in femoral vein were recorded before and after surgery. And then, the comparisons between the two groups were made, respectively. RESULTS: When compared with the conventional graduated compression stockings alone, the intraoperative application of IPCD and stockings contributed the significant reduction of DVT (3.92%, 2/51 versus 9.84%, 6/61, X2 = 5.632, P = 0.034). In terms of the mean and peak velocity of blood flow in femoral vein, the postoperative difference was higher in the observation group than those in the control group (149.56 ± 26.35 versus 130.15 ± 22.56 mm/s, P < 0.05). With respect to perioperative blood loss, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (800.5 ± 320.7 versus 950.1 ± 305.9 ml, P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative application of IPCD could promote blood circulation of lower limbs, and significantly decrease the incidence of potentially fatal DVT in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, when compared with the conventional graduated compression stockings.

[Alternating pneumocompression - effective physiotherapeutic method for the prevention of venous thromboembolic complications in patients of medium and high risk in the acute period of the stroke].

BACKGROUND: the patients presenting with severe post-stroke in the acute period of this condition are characterized by the high risk of venous thromboembolic complications (VTEC), with the most dangerous of them being pulmonary embolism that makes an appreciable contribution to the mortality rate of such patients at the hospital stage of their treatment. Among the physical methods for the prevention of VTE, such as wearing graduated compression stockings (GCS), myoelectrostimulation (MES), pneumatic intermittent compression (PIC), only the latter technique has been shown to be efficient when applied for the treatment of surgical patients during the post-stroke period with the level of evidence 2B and the very uncertain parameters of the impact. AIM: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the advantages of the PIC in comparison with that of GCS and MES, substantiate the choice of the former method for the management of the high-risk post-stroke patients, and determine the impact parameters of PIC during the peracute and acute periods of the disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a series of analyses of the results of several controlled randomized studies and relevant reviews of the literature with a view to determining the feasibility and effectiveness of application of one or another approach and clarifying the parameters of the exposure to GCS, MES, and PIC for the prevention of VTEC. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The results of these studies gave evidence that the effectiveness of the GCS and MES is insufficient in contrast to that of PIC that was found to decrease the relative risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by 62% compared with placebo and by 47% in comparison with GCS. The low risk of DVT associated with the application of PIC was apparent from the low OR value of 0.45 and the absolute reduction in the risk of DVT by 3.6%. The analysis of the parameters being used made it possible to identify side effects and thereby allowed to formulate the optimal method for the application of PIC for the purpose of prevention of VTEC in the post-stroke patients during the peracute and acute periods of the disease. CONCLUSION: Only PIC of all the currently available methods for the physical prevention of VTEC in the group of high risk post-stroke patients during the peracute and acute periods of this condition can be practiced in the reliable evidence-based manner. The most rational PIC modality consists of exerting the external pressure on the lower extremities within the first 12-24 hours after stroke with the use of the cuffs of the «lower leg¼ type (i.e. at a pressure of 40-50 mm Hg in the wave mode with memorization for the multi-sectional cuffs, daily in the continuous manner throughout the daytime till the patient is downgraded to the group at lower risk of VTEC or actually till the discharge from the hospital.