"Lives and times": The case for qualitative longitudinal research in anatomical sciences education.

Qualitative longitudinal research (QLR) focuses on changes in perceptions, interpretations, or practices through time. Despite longstanding traditions in social science, QLR has only recently appeared in anatomical sciences education (ASE). While some existing methodology papers guide researchers, they take a narrow view of QLR and lack specificity for ASE. This discursive article aims to (1) describe what QLR is and its benefits, its philosophies, methodologies and methods, considerations, and quality indicators, and (2) critically discuss examples of QLR in ASE. Underpinned by relativist ontology and subjectivist epistemology, time can be understood as fluid/subjective or fixed/objective. QLR is a flexible, creative, and exploratory methodology, often associated with other methodologies. Sampling is typically purposive, with repeated and recursive data collection methods, and complex three-strand analyses (themes, cases, and time), enabling cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. QLR involves ethical, relationship, analytical, dissemination, and funding considerations. Key quality indicators relate to qualitative research as well as temporal aspects. Most of the nine ASE papers reviewed explored changes in anatomy learners, but few labeled their methodology as QLR. Just under half described their sampling as purposive, most employed pre-planned and standardized repeated interviews, analyzed their data cross-sectionally, and utilized qualitative data analysis software. Most cited the confirmability and transferability of their studies, but few cited credibility and dependability elements. Study timeframes and tempos were generally clear, but details of longitudinal retention/attrition were often lacking, and longitudinal data analysis was not often conducted. We therefore provide recommendations for the conduct of QLR in ASE.

Putting the Horse Back in Front: Advancing Simulation Education With Implementation Science and Structured Research Processes.

This editorial explores the application of implementation science methodologies within simulation-based health professions education. It introduces two models, the adapted implementation model for simulation (AIM-SIM) and the implementation quality rubric for simulation (IQR-SIM), tailored to optimize educational simulation programs' development, implementation, and long-term sustainability in simulation contexts. These models are introduced against the backdrop of their development process, which notably lacked a formal needs assessment, highlighting a critical gap in their foundational preparation. To address this gap effectively, the editorial advocates for a scoping review as a strategic next step. The proposed scoping review will aim to comprehensively survey the landscape of existing literature, specifically probing the utilization of implementation science methodologies within simulation-based education. By identifying gaps and assessing the current state of research, the proposed scoping review will seek to substantiate the necessity for a simulation-specific model grounded in implementation science principles. The outcomes of the future scoping review are anticipated to validate the applicability and relevance of AIM-SIM and IQR-SIM in real-world educational settings. Moreover, it may provide insights crucial for refining these models to better meet the dynamic and nuanced needs of the field. By systematically scrutinizing the existing literature, the proposed scoping review may also elude to how effectively current methodologies address the complexities of simulation-based education. Ultimately, this process has the potential to inform future directions in research and practice, ensuring that simulation programs are not only effectively implemented but also sustained over time, thereby maximizing their impact on health professions education.

Incorporating equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) into the education and assessment of professionalism for healthcare professionals and trainees: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Current definitions of professionalism for healthcare trainees often lack equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in the expectations and assessment of professionalism. While professionalism teaching is incorporated in healthcare training, equity-deserving groups still experience discrimination. This scoping review investigates the literature to understand how EDI and associated domains of cultural humility, and advocacy can be incorporated in healthcare trainees' education and assessment of professionalism. METHODS: The Arksey and O'Malley framework was applied to this scoping review. MEDLINE, Embase & PsychINFO were searched up to March 2023, with terms surrounding health professionals, professionalism, EDI, cultural humility, and advocacy. Titles and abstracts (n = 3870) and full-texts (n = 140) were independently screened by two reviewers. Articles were included if they focused on EDI, cultural humility, or advocacy among healthcare students/trainees, and had outcomes related to professionalism. Articles lacking discussion of professionalism as an outcome were excluded. Themes were generated by mutual discussion. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cote et al. and Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) tools. RESULTS: 48 articles underwent thematic analysis. Studies investigated the disciplines of medicine, nursing, social work, physiotherapy, and dentistry. Most studies were qualitative in methodology (n = 23). Three themes emerged: (1) EDI-related interventions are associated with improved professionalism of healthcare trainees/workers (n = 21). Interventions employed were either an EDI-associated educational course (n = 8) or an exchange program to promote EDI competencies among trainees (n = 13). (2) Trainee definitions and perceptions of professionalism include themes related to EDI and cultural humility (n = 12). (3) Current standards of professionalism are perceived as non-inclusive towards historically-marginalized populations (n = 15). Literature investigating advocacy as it relates to professionalism is limited. CONCLUSION: This review identified that core EDI principles and its associated domains of cultural humility and advocacy are often viewed as integral to professionalism. These findings create a strong impetus to incorporate EDI principles within professionalism frameworks in healthcare education. Future research should employ standardized tools for professionalism assessment to provide more conclusive evidence. Incorporating patient perspectives of professionalism can inform actionable recommendations for fostering inclusive healthcare environments.

The journey of service-learning: Perspectives from medical imaging and therapeutic sciences students.

INTRODUCTION: South Africa (SA) is portrayed as a developing country facing many socio-economic challenges. Service-Learning (SL) is considered an integral part of work-integrated learning (WIL) whereby students are provided an opportunity to experience the real world of work by putting to practice the theory that they have been taught. In the context of this paper, SL is embedded in the undergraduate curriculum of medical imaging and therapeutic sciences (MITS) students in SA, in the form of a SL community project (SLCP). Similar projects permit students to engage with a variety of patient groups to better understand their future patients' bio-psycho-social environments for improved person-centred care practices. Although publications pertaining to students' lived experience of SL are available, no study has yet been conducted with MITS students and their experience of SL. The authors, therefore, aimed to explore the experience of MITS students in SA who successfully completed a SLCP. METHODS: A qualitative research design was employed with the use of purposive sampling. The study population included all registered MITS students at the research site who completed a SLCP. This study was undertaken using a phased approach, phase A: a document analysis of reflective reports, phase B: one-on-one semi-structured interviews and phase C: the development of recommendations. Participation was voluntary and a reflexive thematic analysis technique was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Three main themes were developed: 1) challenges and barriers, 2) positive lecturer attributes and 3) positive project outcomes. Although the participants shared some of their challenges while engaged in SL, several positive outcomes were also highlighted which encouraged them to want to give back to their communities. The support received from their lecturer was highly recognised. Recommendations for educators that were developed included having regular check-in sessions, finding methods to develop a trusting relationship with the students and the consideration of an earlier introduction of SL in the curriculum. CONCLUSION: It is clear, from the findings of this study, that SL is able to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. Within the undergraduate curriculum of healthcare students, SL is considered a key instrument towards cultivating an enhanced sense of civic responsibility. Effective time management and finding sponsors were noted as critical for the successful completion of a SLCP. Personal- and professional growth was evident amongst the sampled participants and the importance of interdisciplinary learning was highlighted. Participants furthermore expressed their appreciation for the opportunity that SL provided them by being able to collaborate with, and learn from, other healthcare professionals.

Snapshot of Examination Usage in Emergency Medicine Clerkships.

Objective Emergency Medicine (EM) clerkships often use a written exam to assess the knowledge gained over the course of an EM rotation in medical school. Clerkship Directors (CDs) may choose the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) EM Advanced Clinical Science Subject Exam (ACE), the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) M4 exam, which has two versions, the SAEM M3 exam, or departmental exams. There are currently no published guidelines or consensus regarding their utility. This survey-based study was designed to collect data regarding current practices of EM clerkship exam usage to analyze trends and variability in what exams are used and how.  Methods The authors designed a cross-sectional observational survey to collect data from EM CDs on exam utilization in clerkships. The survey population consisted of clerkship directors, assistant clerkship directors, or faculty familiar assessments in their EM clerkship. Initial dissemination was by electronic distribution to subscribers of the Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine (CDEM) list-serve on the SAEM website. Subsequently, contact information of CD's from institutions that had not responded was obtained by manual search of the Emergency Medicine Residents' Association (EMRA) Match website and individual correspondence was sent at regular intervals. Data obtained include clerkship characteristics, exam used, weight of the exam relative to the overall grade, and alternatives if the preferred exam was previously taken. Results Eighty-seven programs (42% response rate) completed the survey between August 2019 and February 2021. Of the 87 responses, 71 (82%) were completed by a CD. Forty-six (53%) institutions required an EM rotation. Students were tested in 34 (74%) required EM clerkships and 48 (69%) out of 70 EM electives. In required rotations that used an exam, 20 (59%) used the NBME EM ACE, while 28 of 46 (61%) of EM electives that reported an exam used the SAEM M4 Exam. Five (15%) of the required clerkships used a departmental exam. Of clerkships requiring an exam, 46 (57%) weighed the score at 11-30% of the final grade. Data for extramural rotations mirrored that of EM electives. One-third of respondents indicated they do not inquire about previously taken exams. Conclusion This survey demonstrates significant variability in the type of exam, the weighting of the score, and alternatives if the preferred exam was previously taken. The lack of a consistent approach in how these exams are used in determining students' final EM grades diminishes the reliability of the EM clerkship grade as a factor used by residency directors in choosing future residents. Further research on optimal usage of these exams is needed.

Development of a suite of short planetary health learning resources by students for students as future health professionals.

Planetary health recognizes the interdependencies between human health and the well-being of the Earth's ecosystems. Human activities have led to the disruption and transformation of natural systems and a range of global environmental changes such as climate change, air pollution, and biodiversity loss. Health professionals must be equipped to deal with the health impacts of global environmental changes. This article describes the development and usage of a suite of 14 short online learning resources ('bricks') on Planetary Health on the ScholarRx platform. There are several principles that inform the development of these bricks, including learner-centric, peer learning, diversity, equity and inclusion, and authentic learning. The content is developed using a student-educator collaboration model, supported by an editorial team. The suite of 14 modules was published in June 2023, with the initial usage data promising with 1,990 views in the first 10 months. These digital, modular resources allow for easy dissemination and can be incorporated in different programs depending on context and need.

Success stories: exploring perceptions of former fellows of a global faculty development program for health professions educators.

BACKGROUND: Faculty development programs (FDPs) in health professions education (HPE) are instrumental in supporting, promoting, and improving HPE curricula and activities that target individual- and system-level capacity strengthening. FAIMER, a division of Intealth, has been offering FDPs for global health professions educators in HPE and leadership for over two decades through the International FAIMER Institute in the USA and FAIMER Regional Institutes located globally. This paper explores perceptions of former program participants (Fellows) of FAIMER global FDPs by eliciting their success stories. METHODS: The study utilized a modified Success Case Method approach. Study participants recruited were 14 FAIMER Fellows nominated as exemplars of success cases by program directors and faculty members from seven global sites, using extreme case sampling technique. Of the 14 Fellows, two were from Africa, nine from Asia and three from Latin America. In-depth interviews were conducted with each Fellow to understand their self-perceived success, and factors from both their local context and FAIMER's FDPs that have contributed to their success. Theoretical thematic analysis method was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The top three areas of success perceived by Fellows were career advancement & recognition, professional development, and advancement of HPE. Fellows identified both institutional-level factors and personal attributes as contributing to their success. They also reported that FAIMER global FDPs have substantially contributed to their success by expanding professional networks, fostering academic achievement, and enhancing interpersonal development and leadership skills. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show that Fellows perceive that there are multiple pathways for them to succeed in advancing the field of HPE. The Fellows' stories highlight the continuing value of FAIMER global FDPs for HPE educators worldwide in professional development and leadership. The study also proposes recommendations for enhancing faculty development activities in HPE.

What if we consider research teams as teams?

Research teams are an important means by which knowledge is generated in Health Professions Education (HPE). Although funding agencies encourage the formation of interdisciplinary and interprofessional research teams, we know little about how our interdisciplinary and interprofessional research teams are functioning, nor how best to ensure their success. Indeed, while HPE Scholarship Units and research environments have been the object of study, little work has been focused on research teams themselves. In this article, the authors propose that research teams should be studied as unique instantiations of teams where several individuals work together towards a common goal. Considering research teams as a team can encourage attention to how effective teams are built, supported, and celebrated, it can acknowledge that competent individuals may form incompetent teams, and it opens important avenues for future research. Turning our attention to better understanding how and when research teams thrive should support the development of more effective teams; resulting in reduced waste and redundancy, better mobilization of team members' time and skills, and enhanced knowledge generation. Considering research teams as teams, encourages an understanding that these teams require care, commitment, and effort to sustain them, and it acknowledges that pursuing research in a team context is both a collaborative and a social endeavour.

Nurturing compassion and cultural humility in health professions students through a brief mindfulness practice.

Objective: Given the importance of compassion and cultural humility in healthcare providers, the study aspired to investigate the effects of a brief mindfulness practice on compassion and cultural humility in health professions students. Methods: A quantitative, one-group pre-test/post-test study was conducted with 58 participants from undergraduate health profession education programs in the United States. Participants completed questionnaires measuring mindfulness, compassion, and cultural humility before and after engaging in an eight-minute loving-kindness meditation exercise three to four times per week for two weeks. Results: There were statistically significant increases in mindfulness, compassion, and cultural humility after participants engaged in the brief loving-kindness meditation exercise, with small to moderate effect sizes. Conclusion: Brief mindfulness practices may be helpful for cultivating essential qualities such as compassion and cultural humility in health professions students. Innovation: The findings add to the research gap about the effects of mindfulness on health professions students' compassion and cultural humility. Using mindfulness as a training tool in health professions education may foster compassion, cultural humility, and mindfulness in health professions students who will become healthcare providers, addressing individual health concerns but also broader social issues related to social justice and health equity.

Theoretical foundations and implications of augmented reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality for immersive learning in health professions education.

BACKGROUND: Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR) and Mixed Reality (MR) are emerging technologies that can create immersive learning environments for health professions education. However, there is a lack of systematic reviews on how these technologies are used, what benefits they offer, and what instructional design models or theories guide their use. AIM: This scoping review aims to provide a global overview of the usage and potential benefits of AR/VR/MR tools for education and training of students and professionals in the healthcare domain, and to investigate whether any instructional design models or theories have been applied when using these tools. METHODOLOGY: A systematic search was conducted in several electronic databases to identify peer-reviewed studies published between and including 2015 and 2020 that reported on the use of AR/VR/MR in health professions education. The selected studies were coded and analyzed according to various criteria, such as domains of healthcare, types of participants, types of study design and methodologies, rationales behind the use of AR/VR/MR, types of learning and behavioral outcomes, and findings of the studies. The (Morrison et al. John Wiley & Sons, 2010) model was used as a reference to map the instructional design aspects of the studies. RESULTS: A total of 184 studies were included in the review. The majority of studies focused on the use of VR, followed by AR and MR. The predominant domains of healthcare using these technologies were surgery and anatomy, and the most common types of participants were medical and nursing students. The most frequent types of study design and methodologies were usability studies and randomized controlled trials. The most typical rationales behind the use of AR/VR/MR were to overcome limitations of traditional methods, to provide immersive and realistic training, and to improve students' motivations and engagements. The most standard types of learning and behavioral outcomes were cognitive and psychomotor skills. The majority of studies reported positive or partially positive effects of AR/VR/MR on learning outcomes. Only a few studies explicitly mentioned the use of instructional design models or theories to guide the design and implementation of AR/VR/MR interventions. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The review revealed that AR/VR/MR are promising tools for enhancing health professions education, especially for training surgical and anatomical skills. However, there is a need for more rigorous and theory-based research to investigate the optimal design and integration of these technologies in the curriculum, and to explore their impact on other domains of healthcare and other types of learning outcomes, such as affective and collaborative skills. The review also suggested that the (Morrison et al. John Wiley & Sons, 2010) model can be a useful framework to inform the instructional design of AR/VR/MR interventions, as it covers various elements and factors that need to be considered in the design process.

"I seemed calmer, clearer, and better able to react to challenging situations": phenomenological reflections on learning about mindfulness in health professions education.

It is widely acknowledged that healthcare practitioner well-being is under threat, as many factors like excessive workloads, perceived lack of organizational support, the rapid introduction of new technologies, repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic, and other factors have transformed the health care workplace. Distress, anxiety and burnout are on the rise, and are particularly concerning for health professions' students who must navigate challenging academic and clinical demands, in addition to personal responsibilities. While not a panacea for the systemic issues at play, 'mindfulness practices' have shown some promise in supporting students to navigate stressful environments. Yet despite calls for more phenomenological studies, little is known about health professions students' lived experiences of learning about and using mindfulness in higher education contexts. The objective of this hermeneutic phenomenological study was to inquire into the first-hand lived experiences of health professions students by examining their written reflections on learning about and using mindfulness in a higher education context. The study reports on themes identified in an analysis of students' phenomenological reflections written during and following a mindfulness elective course offered at a Canadian University. The analysis revealed four predominant themes: (a) reframing perceptions, (b)'being' while 'doing', (c) witnessing the struggle, and (d) compassion for self and others. In a time when health professionals are increasingly under strain, and systemic reform is needed but slow to take shape, the findings of this study reveal potential affordances of mindfulness for helping students to navigate the myriad of challenges they face. The findings are unique in their in-depth exploration of students' reflections on the experience of learning about and engaging in 'mindfulness practices' in a higher education context. The findings contribute first-hand perspectives to the evolving field of mindfulness education research and generate new conversations about mindfulness education in the health professions curriculum.

More, better feedback please: are learning analytics dashboards (LAD) the solution to a wicked problem?

There is a long-standing lack of learner satisfaction with quality and quantity of feedback in health professions education (HPE) and training. To address this, university and training programmes are increasingly using technological advancements and data analytic tools to provide feedback. One such educational technology is the Learning Analytic Dashboard (LAD), which holds the promise of a comprehensive view of student performance via partial or fully automated feedback delivered to learners in real time. The possibility of displaying performance data visually, on a single platform, so users can access and process feedback efficiently and constantly, and use this to improve their performance, is very attractive to users, educators and institutions. However, the mainstream literature tends to take an atheoretical and instrumentalist view of LADs, a view that uncritically celebrates the promise of LAD's capacity to provide a 'technical fix' to the 'wicked problem' of feedback in health professions education. This paper seeks to recast the discussion of LADs as something other than a benign material technology using the lenses of Miller and Rose's technologies of government and Barry's theory of Technological Societies, where such technical devices are also inherently agentic and political. An examination of the purpose, design and deployment of LADs from these theoretical perspectives can reveal how these educational devices shape and govern the HPE learner body in different ways, which in turn, may produce a myriad of unintended- and ironic- effects on the feedback process. In this Reflections article we wish to encourage health professions education scholars to examine the practices and consequences thereof of the ever-expanding use of LADs more deeply and with a sense of urgency.

Twelve tips for strengthening global equity in health professions education publication.

Despite recent calls to engage in scholarship with attention to anti-racism, equity, and social justice at a global level in Health Professions Education (HPE), the field has made few significant advances in incorporating the views of the so-called "Other" in understanding the nature, origin, and scope of knowledge as well as the epistemic justification of knowledge production. Editors, authors, and reviewers must take responsibility for questioning existing systems and structures, specifically about how they diffuse the knowledge of a few and silence the knowledge of many. This article presents 12 recommendations proposed by The Global South Counterspace Authors Collective (GSCAC), a group of HPE professionals, representing countries in the Global South, to help the Global North enact practical changes to become more inclusive and engage in authentic and representative work in HPE publishing. This list is not all-encompassing but a first step to begin rectifying non-inclusive structures in our field.

An antiracism framework for educating nursing professionals.

BACKGROUND: A conceptual, methodological, and theoretical framework is needed in Nursing Education to center racism, in the curriculum, as a root cause of health inequity. PURPOSE: To provide Nursing and health professions' educators with a comprehensive unifying framework to fundamentally conceptualize and deliver a curriculum which positions racism's impact as a root cause of health inequities. METHODS: Critical race theory is the underpinning for a historical analysis of racism and a critique of scientific racism, whiteness, and white supremacy ideologies that perpetuate harmful and lethal outcomes for racialized individuals and communities. RESULTS: This framework conceptualizes learning, unlearning, relearning, and reflective practice as the fundamental process needed to transformative nursing education and advance health equity. DISCUSSION: Methodological application is given for 1) unlearning harmful white supremacy ideology 2) learning that racism as it is embedded in every sector of American life and racial inequities are inherent in the health care system 3) relearning the importance of counternarratives and building structural competency and 4) engaging in reflective practice to challenge deficit paradigms assigned to racialized people and their communities. CONCLUSION: The Antiracism Framework provides foundational principles, guiding steps, and rationale for curricula that acknowledges the critical role of racism as a barrier to achieving health equity.

Unveiling the impact of interprofessional education on shaping students' interprofessional identity and collaboration perception: a mixed-method study.

BACKGROUND: Interprofessional education (IPE) has the potential to shape students' collaboration perception and interprofessional identity but remains understudied. This study aims to understand the effects of the IPE program as a contextual trigger to promote collaboration perception change and interprofessional identity formation among healthcare professional students. METHODS: Using concurrent triangulation mixed-methods, we examined the relationship between collaboration perception and interprofessional identity change among health profession students (N = 263), and explored their perspectives on how their IPE experiences influenced their perception and identity. Participants completed the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale and Extended Professional Identity Scale and responded to open-ended questions before and after the IPE intervention. Pearson's correlation, t-tests, regression (quantitative), and thematic analysis (qualitative) were conducted. RESULTS: Teams with initially lower collaboration perception (M = 3.59) and lower interprofessional identity (M = 3.59) showed a significant increase in collaboration perception (M = 3.76, t = 2.63; p = .02) and interprofessional identity (M = 3.97, t = 4.86; p < .001) after participating in IPE. The positive relationship between collaboration perception and interprofessional identity strengthened after participating in IPE, as evident from the correlation (Time 1: r = .69; p < .001; Time 2: r = .79; p < .001). Furthermore, collaboration perception in Time 1 significantly predicted the variance in interprofessional identity at Time 2 (ß = 0.347, p < .001). Qualitative findings indicated that 85.2% of students expressed that IPE played a role in promoting their interprofessional identity and collaboration attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating the IPE program into the curriculum can effectively enhance students' collaboration perception and interprofessional identity, ultimately preparing them for collaborative practice in the healthcare system. By engaging students in interprofessional teamwork, communication, and joint decision-making processes, the IPE program provides a valuable context for students to develop a sense of belonging and commitment to interprofessional collaboration.

Empowering the future: improving community wellbeing and health literacy through outreach and service-learning.

Institutions training future healthcare professionals in healthcare and community engagement play a crucial role beyond traditional classroom settings. Recognizing their potential to support under-represented groups and minorities, institutions increasingly encourage engagement with schools and community organizations. However, work remains to advance meaningful and impactful educational outreach and service-learning programs. This manuscript synthesizes the perspectives of a group of medical school educators to discuss developing sustainable programs to engage youth in Science, Technology, Engineering, Math, and Medicine (STEMM) education with a focus on biomedical science. Through near-peer education and service-learning, healthcare students can impart knowledge, provide mentorship, promote enthusiasm for STEMM fields, and nurture health-related self-efficacy within individuals and communities. Collaborative efforts through student-as-teacher approaches bridge health-related disparities and cultivate healthier, more empowered futures for all. We advocate for community outreach strategies that target future health professionals early in their education and support the scholarship of teaching and learning and program evaluation. Successful long-term programs must ensure that results are systematically assessed, measured, and perpetuated. This perspective aims to highlight the role of service learning and community outreach in increasing individual health literacy and fostering an enduring interest in STEMM careers, thereby empowering the next generation of elementary and secondary school students.

International collaboration in health professions education.

This article explores the essential elements for achieving excellence in international collaborations within health professions education (HPE), drawing on the Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) ASPIRE Award criteria for International Collaboration. The International Collaboration award transcends recognition of excellence through the award; it aims to foster excellence in international HPE collaborations more broadly, by establishing a framework for evaluation and development that functions cross-culturally. This framework is based on five key elements that contribute to successful collaborations: mutually agreed goals; shared responsibilities and leadership structures; processes that support collaboration; demonstrated long-term impact and sustainability, and evaluation and practice sharing. Recognizing the historical context of unequal power dynamics in international partnerships, this article promotes the development of ethical and equitable collaborations. We advocate for integrating cultural competence, epistemic plurality, and leadership skills into HPE curricula to prepare future healthcare professionals for effective international collaboration.

ALLin4IPE- an international research study on interprofessional health professions education: a protocol for an ethnographic multiple-case study of practice architectures in sites of students' interprofessional clinical placements across four universities.

BACKGROUND: The global discourse on future health care emphasises that learning to collaborate across professions is crucial to assure patient safety and meet the changing demands of health care. The research on interprofessional education (IPE) is diverse but with gaps in curricula design and how IPE is enacted in practice. PURPOSE AND AIMS: This research project will identify. 1) how IPE in clinical placements emerges, evolves, and is enacted by students when embedded in local health care practices, 2) factors critical for the design of IPE for students at clinical placements across the four countries. METHODS: A study involving four countries (Sweden, Norway, Australia and New Zealand) using the theory of practice architectures will be undertaken between 2023 and 2027. The project is designed as an international, collaborative multiple-case ethnographic study, using the theoretical framework of practice architectures (TPA). It will include four ethnographic case studies of IPE, one in each country. Data will be collected in the following sequence: (1) participant observation of students during interprofessional placements, (2) interviews with students at clinical placement and stakeholders/professionals, (3) Non-clinical documents may be used to support the analysis, and collection of photos may be use as memory aids for documenting context. An analysis of "sayings, doings and relatings" will address features of the cultural- discursive, material-economic, social-political elements making up the three key dimensions of TPA. Each of the four international cases will be analysed separately. A cross case analysis will be undertaken to establish common learning and critical IPE design elements across the four collaborating universities. DISCUSSION: The use of TPA framework and methodology in the analysis of data will make it possible to identify comparable dimensions across the four research sites, enabling core questions to be addressed critical for the design of IPE. The ethnographic field studies will generate detailed descriptions that take account of country-specific cultural and practice contexts. The study will also generate new knowledge as to how IPE can be collaboratively researched.

Designing near-peer mentoring for work integrated learning outcomes: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Work-integrated learning (WIL) is a core aspect of allied health education. WIL placements typically focus on developing clinical skills, with broader conceptions of work readiness a secondary consideration. Near-peer mentoring (NPM), where senior students mentor junior students, is one WIL placement model that holds promise for developing students' work readiness, along with additional benefits for educators and service users. While there is emerging evidence of the benefits of NPM in allied health, a more comprehensive understanding of the design and outcomes of NPM WIL placements for allied health students, their educators and service users is needed. METHODS: A systematic search of seven electronic databases (CINAHL, ERIC, ProQuest Education, Medline, PsychInfo, EMBASE and Scopus) from 2003 to 2022 was conducted with 4195 records reviewed. Included studies reported on near-peer mentoring between at least one of the identified 11 allied health professionals providing services to real people (i.e. not simulation). Data extracted included pedagogical approaches, type of service model and relationship of peers to each other and educator, objectives for implementing the NPM, and effects for students. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Standards for Reporting of Qualitative Research (SRQR). RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority were North American in origin, from the disciplines of pharmacy, physiotherapy, psychology and occupational therapy, and used a range of research designs. Four types of placement design were observed from incidental co-location of students and observing outcomes through to deliberate preparation of students and/or educators for their roles in a NPM placement. Outcomes for junior students included lowered anxiety leading to increased confidence and motivation to learn and thus enhanced clinical skills. Senior student outcomes included development of educator skills, increased confidence, and enhanced professional reasoning. Service users and educators also benefited from NPM; however, evidence was sparse in these areas. CONCLUSION: The evidence supports near-peer mentoring as a valuable WIL model to support work readiness, and several general pedagogical designs are evident. Future research should design NPM WIL with a greater integration of educational theory and evaluate outcomes beyond satisfaction and self-reported experiences.

Curriculum reform and stereotype threat in medical education: Implications for student well-being.

PURPOSE: Altering the curriculum of a program can have negative repercussions for the student experience, including peer mentorships and interclass relationships. This study investigated the effect of curriculum reform on students' emotional and social well-being in a predoctoral dental program. We explored if any of these consequences could be related to stereotype threat. METHODS: We utilized a quasi-experimental design with two different treatments, New Curriculum Treatment (New-CT, n = 44) and Past Curriculum Treatment (Past-CT, n = 43). Quantitative data were collected through surveys to assess students' perceptions of curriculum changes and their impacts on anxiety, confidence, and clinical performance. Qualitative data were gathered via semi-structured interviews to explore personal experiences of stereotype threat and its implications on peer relationships and mentorship dynamics. RESULTS: The findings suggest significant effects of curriculum changes on interpersonal relationships. Past-CT viewed New-CT as overconfident, while New-CT felt heightened performance pressure. Thematic and interview analyses revealed deep-rooted tensions, with New-CT feeling mistrusted and Past-CT resenting New-CT's perceived accelerated competence. Stereotype threat was identified as a key factor worsening these inter-group tensions and affecting clinical performance and relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Curriculum changes in dental education can significantly affect students' well-being, with stereotype threat playing a critical role in these dynamics. When making changes to the structure, sequencing, or content of a program, administrators need to be aware of the potential ramifications these changes could have on students' relationships with their peers.