Breast conserving surgery with intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy for low-risk breast cancer: Five-year follow-up of 306 patients.

Recent studies have reported a higher than expected risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) and a single dose of electron beam intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT). This finding was the rationale to perform a retrospective single center cohort study evaluating the oncologic results of consecutive patients treated with BCS and IORT. Women were eligible if they had clinical low-risk (N0, ≤2 cm unifocal, Bloom and Richardson grade 1-2), estrogen receptor-positive and human-epidermal-growth-factor-receptor-2-negative breast cancer. Prior to BCS, pN0 status was determined by sentinel lymph node biopsy. Data on oncologic follow-up were analyzed. Between 2012 and 2019, 306 consecutive patients were treated and analyzed, with a median age of 67 (50-86) years at diagnosis. Median follow-up was 60 (8-120) months. Five-year cumulative risk of IBTR was 13.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.4-17.4). True in field recurrence was present in 3.9% of the patients. In 4.6% of the patients, the IBRT was classified as a local recurrence due to seeding of tumor cells in the cutis or subcutis most likely related to percutaneous biopsy. In 2.9% of the patients, the IBRT was a new outfield primary tumor. Three patients had a regional lymph node recurrence and two had distant metastases as first event. One breast cancer-related death was observed. Estimated 5-year overall survival was 89.8% (95% CI 86.0-93.6). In conclusion, although some of IBTR cases could have been prevented by adaptations in biopsy techniques and patient selection, BCS followed by IORT was associated with a substantial risk of IBTR.

A review study on application of gel dosimeters in low energy radiation dosimetry.

INTRODUCTION: The accuracy of dose delivered to tumors and surrounding normal tissues is vital in either radiotherapy using low energy photons and radiological techniques as well as radiotherapy with mega voltage energies. This systematic review focuses on applications of gel dosimetry in low energy radiation contexts applied either through radiotherapy or interventional radiology. METHODS: Literature was reviewed based on electronic databases: Google Scholar, Scopus, Embase, PubMed, Science Direct, Research Gate and IOP science. The search was conducted on relevant terms in the title and keywords. 82 articles related to our criteria has been extracted and included in the study. RESULTS: The findings demonstrated that almost all types of gel dosimeters had an acceptable accuracy and high resolution in low energy radiation contexts with their own limitations and advantages. CONCLUSION: Gel dosimeters compete well with other conventional dosimeters in terms of tissue equivalence and energy dependence; however, choosing the best gel dosimeter for use in low energy radiation dosimetry depends on their different limitation and advantages. There are some general features about each gel group which can help to select the suitable gel related to our work. For example, methacrylic acid based gel dosimeters show higher sensitivity compared to other types of gel dosimeters but have more toxicity and are dose rate dependent in the range of dose rates applied in low energy contexts. In addition, Fricke gel dosimeters exhibit less sensitivity while they are independent of dose rate and energy applied in low energy situations.

The role of intraoperative radiotherapy in advanced rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

AIM: Patients with locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LARC/LRRC) experience higher rates of local recurrence (LR) and poorer overall survival than patients with primary rectal cancer restricted to the mesorectum despite improved neoadjuvant treatment regimens and radical surgical procedures. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has been suggested as an adjunctive tool in the surgical management of these challenging cases. However, clear evidence regarding the oncological benefit of IORT is sparse. The aim of this review was to update this evidence in the era of standardized neoadjuvant radiotherapy administration. METHOD: A systematic review of patients who received IORT as part of multimodal treatment for advanced rectal cancer from 2000 to 2020 and an analysis of IORT and surgery/external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) groups was performed. The primary endpoint was the rate of LR between the two groups. RESULTS: Seven papers met the predefined criteria. LR was reduced by the addition of IORT when compared with the surgery/EBRT alone group (14.7% vs. 21.4%; OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.27-1.14; p = 0.11). There was no increase in reported genitourinary morbidity, wound issues, pelvic collections or anastomotic leak in those patients who received IORT. Notably, there was no survival difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of IORT to current treatment strategies in the management of patients with LARC/LRRC is associated with a lower rate of locoregional recurrence without increased morbidity. However, this marks a highly selective group of patients, with heterogeneity regarding indications, prior neoadjuvant treatments and/or IORT dosing.

Electron beam intraoperative radiotherapy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: a prospective observational study.

To assess the additional effects of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with decompression surgery and adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). This single-arm institutional prospective observational study recruited patients between June 2017 and March 2020 and included those with symptoms of spinal cord compression owing to metastases, who were diagnosed using MRI. Patients with radiation-sensitive primary tumors and those who could not tolerate surgery were excluded. The treatment protocol comprised decompression surgery and electron beam IORT of 20 Gy in a single fraction followed by EBRT of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The primary endpoints included the 1-year local failure rate and ambulatory functions. The study was closed in May 2019 owing to changes in treatment policies at our institution. Twenty patients were registered between June 2017 and May 2019. Although all patients completed surgery and IORT, 2 did not receive postoperative EBRT. Patients most commonly had colorectal cancer (4 patients), followed by thyroid cancer, renal cell carcinoma, lung cancer, breast cancer, sarcomas, and other cancers (3, 3, 2, 2, 2, and 4 patients, respectively). The median follow-up duration was 16 months (range 2-30 months); the 1-year local failure rate was 16%. On comparing ambulatory functions pre-treatment and at 1 year after treatment, improvement, no change, and worsening were observed in 3, 9, and 0 patients, respectively. This study's findings suggest that decompression surgery and IORT followed by EBRT are effective in achieving local control and maintaining ambulation in patients with MESCC.

A phase II study investigating the acute toxicity of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy as tumor-bed boost plus whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery in Korean patients.

BACKGROUND: There are concerns regarding local toxicity when IORT is applied in Asian women with a smaller breast volume than that of Western women. Trials are required to develop safety profiles for this technique. The aim of this trial was to evaluate acute toxicity after intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT) with low-energy X-ray plus whole breast irradiation (WBI) in Asian patients with breast cancer. METHODS: This single-arm, single-institute, phase II trial investigated acute toxicity after completion of radiotherapy (targeted IORT followed by WBI) in Korean patients treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS). In the conventional WBI arm from the TARGIT-A trial, the incidence of acute toxicity within 6 months was 15%. To prove the non-inferiority of the acute toxicity rate, 215 patients were required. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02213991). RESULTS: Two-hundred and fifteen women were enrolled, and 198 underwent IORT. In 33 patients, clinically significant complications during the acute period were noted. The incidence of acute toxicity was 16.7% (95% CI 11.5-21.9%). There were 29 patients with seroma needing more than 3 aspirations, 4 with wound infection, and 2 with skin breakdown. There was no difference in the rate of complications according to the tumor volume or the tumor-breast volume ratio. Advanced age and high BMI were risk factors for acute complications. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted intra-operative radiotherapy using Intrabeam® is a safe procedure for Korean patients with breast cancer with an acceptable toxicity profile in the acute period.

[A prospective pilot study of combined intra-operative radiotherapy for centrally located hepatocellular carcinomas].

Objective: To carry out a prospective cohort study of combined intra-operative radiotherapy for centrally located hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and to observe the safety and postoperative complications. Methods: A total of 79 patients with centrally located HCC who underwent hepatectomy were divided into two groups: experimental group (combined with targeted intra-operative radiotherapy, 32 cases) and control group (single surgical operation, 47 cases). Patients in the experimental group received intra-operative electron radiotherapy after tumor resection, while patients in the control group received to intra-operative electron radiotherapy.The haemorrhagia amount and operation time during the operation, intra-operative liver function and the recovery of liver and gastrointestinal tract of patients in these two groups were compared. Results: No postoperative 30-day mortality was observed in all of the patients. The average total operation time of patients in the experimental group was (319±76) min, significantly longer than (233±76) min of the control group (P<0.001). The average aspartate transaminase (AST) level of patients in the experimental group at postoperative day 1 was 562.5 U/L, significantly higher than 347.0 U/L of control group (P=0.031). However, the average prothrombin activity levels of patients in the experimental group at postoperative day 3 and day 7 were (68.3±17.9)% and (73.4±10.2)%, respectively, significantly lower than (78.9±15.9)% and (80.0±10.6)% of control group (both P<0.05). There were no significant differences of tumor volume, differentiation degree, satellite lesion, dorsal membrane invasion, microvascular invasion between these two groups (all P>0.05). There were no significant differences of hospital stay, ventilation time, the incidence of hepatic insufficiency, ascites, pleural effusion, infection, biliary fistula between these two groups (all P>0.05). There were no significant differences of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, total bilirubin between these two groups at postoperative day 1, 3, 5 and 7 (all of P>0.05). Conclusion: The resection of centrally located HCC combined with intra-operative radiotherapy may increase the total operation time, delay the early postoperative recovery of liver function, but it is still safe and feasible. Trial registration: National Cancer Centre /Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, ChiCTR-TRC-12002802.

A prospective pilot study of combined intra-operative radiotherapy for centrally located hepatocellular carcinomas / 中华肿瘤杂志

Objective@#To carry out a prospective cohort study of combined intra-operative radiotherapy for centrally located hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and to observe the safety and postoperative complications.@*Methods@#A total of 79 patients with centrally located HCC who underwent hepatectomy were divided into two groups: experimental group (combined with targeted intra-operative radiotherapy, 32 cases) and control group (single surgical operation, 47 cases). Patients in the experimental group received intra-operative electron radiotherapy after tumor resection, while patients in the control group received to intra-operative electron radiotherapy.The haemorrhagia amount and operation time during the operation, intra-operative liver function and the recovery of liver and gastrointestinal tract of patients in these two groups were compared.@*Results@#No postoperative 30-day mortality was observed in all of the patients. The average total operation time of patients in the experimental group was (319±76) min, significantly longer than (233±76) min of the control group (P<0.001). The average aspartate transaminase (AST) level of patients in the experimental group at postoperative day 1 was 562.5 U/L, significantly higher than 347.0 U/L of control group (P=0.031). However, the average prothrombin activity levels of patients in the experimental group at postoperative day 3 and day 7 were (68.3±17.9)% and (73.4±10.2)%, respectively, significantly lower than (78.9±15.9)% and (80.0±10.6)% of control group (both P<0.05). There were no significant differences of tumor volume, differentiation degree, satellite lesion, dorsal membrane invasion, microvascular invasion between these two groups (all P>0.05). There were no significant differences of hospital stay, ventilation time, the incidence of hepatic insufficiency, ascites, pleural effusion, infection, biliary fistula between these two groups (all P>0.05). There were no significant differences of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, total bilirubin between these two groups at postoperative day 1, 3, 5 and 7 (all of P>0.05).@*Conclusion@#The resection of centrally located HCC combined with intra-operative radiotherapy may increase the total operation time, delay the early postoperative recovery of liver function, but it is still safe and feasible.@*Trial registration@#National Cancer Centre /Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, ChiCTR-TRC-12002802.

Intraoperative radiotherapy using low-energy X rays：dosimetric characteristics and potential limitations in clinical application / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

Objective To test intraoperative radiotherapy with mobile photon beam using the INTRABEAM system ( Germany) , and to analyze the dosimetric characteristics of low?energy photon beam using X?ray source and spherical applicators and explore its potential limitations in clinical application. Methods A special water phantom, a parallel?plate ionization chamber, and an electrometer were used to measure the depth dose rates and isotropy of dose distribution in x/y plane of X?ray source and different spherical applicators in the INTRABEAM system. Those data were then compared with the system data. Results For the X?ray source, the deviation of observed depth dose rate and isotropy in the x/y plane from the system data were-2.16%± 1. 36% and-1.9%~ 2. 1%, respectively. For applicators with different diameters, the deviation of observed depth dose rate, transfer coefficient, and isotropy in x/y plane from the system data were-10.0%~2. 3%,-8.9%~4. 2%, and-1.6%~2. 6%, respectively. Surface dose rate and dose gradient became larger with the decrease in the diameter of the spherical applicator. The measurement of depth dose rate and isotropy of X?ray source and spherical applicators showed good repeatability. The influencing factors for measurement accuracy included the positioning error of ionization chamber, energy response, noise current, and correction factor f ’ ( R ) . Conclusions This study reveals the dosimetric characteristics of the INTRABEAM system, verifies the accuracy of the system data, and obtains the data for clinical application and routine quality assurance. However, large dose gradient and small therapeutic range may limit its wide clinical application.

Intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT) as a treatment for breast cancer is a relatively new technique that is designed to be a replacement for whole breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in selected women suitable for breast-conserving therapy. This article reviews twelve reasons for the use of the technique, with a particular emphasis on targeted intra-operative radiotherapy (TARGIT) which uses X-rays generated from a portable device within the operating theatre immediately after the breast tumour (and surrounding margin of healthy tissue) has been removed. The delivery of a single fraction of radiotherapy directly to the tumour bed at the time of surgery, with the capability of adding EBRT at a later date if required (risk-adaptive technique) is discussed in light of recent results from a large multinational randomised controlled trial comparing TARGIT with EBRT. The technique avoids irradiation of normal tissues such as skin, heart, lungs, ribs and spine, and has been shown to improve cosmetic outcome when compared with EBRT. Beneficial aspects to both institutional and societal economics are discussed, together with evidence demonstrating excellent patient satisfaction and quality of life. There is a discussion of the published evidence regarding the use of IORT twice in the same breast (for new primary cancers) and in patients who would never be considered for EBRT because of their special circumstances (such as the frail, the elderly, or those with collagen vascular disease). Finally, there is a discussion of the role of the TARGIT Academy in developing and sustaining high standards in the use of the technique.

[State of the art and perspectives of accelerated partial breast irradiation in 2014]. / État de l'art et perspectives de l'irradiation partielle et accélérée du sein en 2014.

In the frame of treatment de-escalation and personalization, accelerated partial breast irradiation is taking its place in the breast cancer therapeutic options. This study analyzed the results of phase III randomized trials having compared accelerated partial breast irradiation versus whole breast irradiation. Currently, among those trails, six proposed some results regarding efficacy and/or toxicity. Globally, the non-randomized studies confirmed the expected results showing a low rate of local recurrence and toxicity. The first results of the phase III randomized trials showed encouraging data in terms of local control while the toxicity varied mainly according to the accelerated partial breast irradiation technique used. However, the follow-up of the majority of these studies remains insufficient. The strict respect of accelerated partial breast irradiation indications likely represents one of the key factors of the therapeutic success. The next results could allow proposing a better definition of the accelerated partial breast irradiation selection criteria.

Day-care for breast cancer: ambulatory surgery and intra-operative radiation. Techniques and preliminary results of the Centre Val-d'Aurelle--Montpellier.

One-day breast carcinoma treatment is defined as association of ambulatory surgery and intra-operative irradiation. Selection and rigorous process of patients is the key to success. The surgical technique is not changed by the radiotherapy. Patient's satisfaction index is very high. Financial loss should not be a hurdle to its implementation.

Anaesthetic techniques for unique cancer surgery procedures.

Recent advances in cancer therapy have seen increased combinations of different treatment modalities as well as novel approaches that affect anaesthetic care. Increasingly, surgery is being combined with chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Moreover, minimally invasive procedures are gaining popularity and more targeted therapies are being used. These events have created a demand for new anaesthetic techniques from anaesthesiologists in order to provide safe patient care. This article will discuss anaesthetic considerations for proton therapy, hyperthermic intracavitary chemotherapy, limb perfusion, radiosurgery, robotic surgery and intra-operative radiation therapy and high-dose brachytherapy.