The Efficacy of LRINEC Scoring in Patients with Necrotizing Fasciitis and its Correlation with the Outcomes.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is an expeditiously escalating inflammatory infection of the fascia, with secondary necrosis of the subcutaneous tissues. To aid diagnosis, the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) scoring system was devised to stratify the likelihood of infection in patients on presentation.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> The study aimed to investigate and quantify the relationships between the LRINEC scoring system and the outcomes such as the need for amputation, length of hospital stay, and mortality in patients with necrotizing fasciitis.</br> <b><br>Material and methods:</b> A total number of 90 patients were admitted with a provisional diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis. LRINEC score was calculated for each case based on six laboratory variables at the time of presentation. Enrolled patients were divided into three groups on the basis of the LRINEC score. The differences in mortality, length of hospitalization, number of debridement procedures, and need for amputation between these groups were compared.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> Increasing age, male gender, and DM have a poor prognosis in necrotizing fasciitis patients. The amputation and mortality rates are better correlated with higher LRINEC scores.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> The LRINEC score helps in stratifying the patients into three risk categories (low risk, moderate risk, and high risk) according to the severity in a much more organized way, and thus the appropriate management like surgical debridement can be introduced on time. LRINEC score is a robust index that is capable of detecting early cases of necrotizing fasciitis and is simple enough for routine use. It is a simplified bedside diagnostic tool for early diagnosis and prediction of outcomes in patients with necrotizing fasciitis.</br>.

Fournier's gangrene originating from the perianal region or the urogenital area: does it make a difference?

OBJECTIVE: Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a rare and serious disorder which is associated with high mortality. In the literature, there is no study evaluating clinician-, patient- and disease-related factors affecting disease outcomes according to aetiological variation in FG. In our study, laboratory results and Uludag Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index (UFGSI) score, clinical characteristics and mortality rates were compared between FG originating from perianal or from urogenital regions. METHOD: Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) and UFGSI risk scores were calculated in patients with FG at presentation to the emergency department. The patients were assigned to two groups according to FG aetiology. RESULTS: It was observed that the number of debridement interventions and the need for colostomy were significantly greater in the perianal FG group, while the need for flap or reconstruction was significantly (p=0.002) higher in the genitourinary FG group. No significant difference was detected in mortality between groups and the difference in aetiology had no significant effect on the results of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, LRINEC or UFGSI scores. CONCLUSION: Laboratory results and UFGSI score were helpful in assessing disease severity independently from aetiology. The higher number of debridement interventions to protect anal function in the perianal group and the greater need for reconstructive surgery in the urogenital group were identified as factors that prolonged length of hospital stay.

A rare case of necrotizing fasciitis of the leg in an intravenous drug user caused by Prevotella denticola.

Background: Intravenous drug users (IDUs) have a high risk of developing skin and soft tissue infections such as erysipelas, abscesses, and less frequently necrotizing fasciitis (NF) or gas gangrene. Rarely, the cause of the infection is microorganisms residing in the oral cavity and can lead to life-threatening infections. Methods: We describe the case of a 43-year-old man intravenous drug user (IDU) who was admitted for intense leg pain following an injection of cocaine at that site. Results: A clinical and radiological diagnosis of NF was made, so the patient was started on empirical antibiotic therapy and underwent surgical fasciotomy (after 8 hours from admission). Prevotella denticola was isolated from multiple intraoperative specimens and was resistant to initial antimicrobial therapy. The man, suffering from periodontal disease, reported sucking the syringe several times to unblock it. Both fasciotomy surgery and adjustment of antimicrobial therapy enabled therapeutic success. Conclusions: In IDUs the risk of deep skin and soft tissue infections is high and may be aggravated by contamination with oral microorganisms. The choice of empirical antibiotic treatment should include agents active against oral cavity anaerobes, such as P. denticola.

Necrotizing Fasciitis Associated With Toxic Shock Syndrome.

Necrotizing fasciitis is a rapidly progressing bacterial infection that affects the deep fascia and subcutaneous tissues, often resulting in tissue necrosis and systemic toxicity. This case involves a male in his late forties who initially sought emergency care for a minor rash on his right lower extremity and symptoms of a viral illness. Despite an initial diagnosis of hematoma, his symptoms rapidly escalated within 24 hours, prompting his return to the emergency room. During this subsequent visit, signs of septic shock emerged, accompanied by a worsening rash and blister formation. Admitted to the intensive care unit, our patient received urgent treatment, including broad-spectrum antibiotics and surgical debridement based on the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score for assessing necrotizing fasciitis severity. Further debridement and a fasciotomy were performed, leading to improved clinical conditions, stabilized vitals, and normalized laboratory results. This case underscores the critical importance of early clinical suspicion, prompt diagnosis, and a collaborative, team-based approach in successfully managing necrotizing fasciitis.

Evaluation of laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis score as an early diagnostic tool for necrotizing fasciitis: a prospective observational study.

Introduction: From its historical identification to modern times with advancements in management modalities globally, the mortality of necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is high ranging from 19 to 30% for all affected sites. Although many diagnostic adjuncts have been developed to assist with the prompt and accurate diagnosis of NF, the primary diagnosis is still based on high clinical suspicion. The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score was developed as a tool for distinguishing NF from other soft tissue infections. The main objective of this study is to evaluate LRINEC as a tool for early diagnosis of NF and differentiating it from other soft tissue infections like cellulitis. Methods: This is a single-centered, prospective observational study. Patients presenting with soft tissue infections of the limbs to the emergency department from November 2020 to October 2021 were included in this study. The clinical findings and blood parameters for the LRINEC score were collected and the score was calculated. Based on clinical suspicion of NF, patients underwent debridement and had a tissue biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. The data obtained was analyzed using SPSS version 24 and MS Excel. The AUC curve was used to calculate a cutoff, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for the LRINEC score based on our study. Results: Forty-five patients with 28 males and 17 females were included. The average age was 53.667 years within a range of 19-79 years. Among them 44.4% of the patients had NF and 66.6% had other minor forms of soft tissue infections. The ROC curve obtained a cutoff value of greater than or equal to 6, with an AUC of 0.751. At this cut of value study showed a sensitivity of 85% with a specificity of 52%. Similarly, positive predictive value was found to be 58.62%, negative predictive values of 81.25%, and overall accuracy of 66.67% in early diagnosis of NF. Conclusion: In conclusion, our study showed that the LRINEC score can be a reliable tool for the early diagnosis of NF in an ED setting. This scoring system is best to be used to rule out NF.

Necrotizing fasciitis due to mycobacterium tuberculosis: A case report.

We admitted a patient with extensive and rapidly progressing necrotizing fasciitis, pulmonary tuberculosis, cutaneous tuberculosis, and bacterial infections because of late diagnosis and treatment. Early diagnosis is necessary for both cutaneous tuberculosis and necrotizing fasciitis. However, these are rare clinical manifestations and are difficult to detect. Despite surgical and pharmacologic treatment, the patient had poor outcomes. We discussed the next-generation sequencing test for early tuberculosis diagnosis, especially for atypical ones. The modified and typical laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis score was used for diagnosing and identifying patients at high risk for necrotizing fasciitis. Subcutaneous effusions and gas accumulations observed through imaging were useful in assessing necrotizing fasciitis progression. Debridement or tuberculosis treatment should be initiated as early as possible in managing patients with both necrotizing fasciitis and cutaneous tuberculosis. Clinicians should be alert in identifying the condition, whether Mycobacteria tuberculosis is the independent cause of necrotizing fasciitis, and treating the condition. The choice of rapid microbial diagnostic tools should be of concern. Debridement or tuberculosis treatment should be initiated as early as possible in managing patients with both necrotizing fasciitis and cutaneous tuberculosis. Multidisciplinary cooperation should be considered.

Is the LRINEC score useful for predicting necrotizing fasciitis as a complication of MRONJ?

INTRODUCTION: Necrotizing fasciitis as a complication of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), which we named "ONJ-NF", has been sometimes reported. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score for predicting ONJ-NF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients with acute MRONJ who required hospitalization at a single institution from April 2013 to June 2022. They were divided into two groups: patients with ONJ-NF and those with severe cellulitis as a complication of MRONJ, which we named "ONJ-SC." LRINEC scores were compared between the groups and the cut-off value of the score was set by creating a receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Eight patients with ONJ-NF and 22 patients with ONJ-SC were included. The LRINEC score was significantly higher in patients with ONJ-NF (median: 8.0 points, range 6-10 points) than in those with ONJ-SC (median: 2.5 points, range 0-6 points). A LRINEC score of ≥ 6 points had a sensitivity of 100.0%, a specificity of 77.3%, and an area under the curve of 0.97. Among 6 parameters of LRINEC score, only C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) had significant differences between two groups. Most of the patients with ONJ-NF were rescued by antibiotic therapy and surgical drainage including debridement of necrotic tissues, but unfortunately, one patient did not survive. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that the LRINEC score may be a useful diagnostic tool to predict ONJ-NF but valuating only CRP and WBC may be sufficient particularly in patients with osteoporosis.

A Case Report of Culture-Negative Necrotizing Fasciitis With Low Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) Score: A Diagnostic Dilemma.

The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score is a diagnostic tool used to help clinicians identify necrotizing fasciitis (NF) in its early stages. This tool uses six laboratory values including the patient's white blood cell count, C-reactive protein level, serum sodium level, creatinine level, and hemoglobin level to help with risk stratification. Each of these laboratory values is assigned a point value and the total score is used to determine the likelihood that a patient has NF, with a score of 6 or higher considered to be strongly indicative. The LRINEC score has gained popularity in recent years, having been included in guidelines and society recommendations for the management of NF. However, some studies have challenged the validity of the LRINEC score. Prompt and accurate diagnosis of NF is imperative given the associated mortality rate, which can be as high as 30%-40%, especially if the diagnosis is delayed. We present a case of a patient with a delayed diagnosis of NF that was initially missed in the early stages in the setting of a low LRINEC, however, growing clinical suspicion eventually led to an accurate diagnosis and management.

Necrotizing Fasciitis-Severe Complication of Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review, Risk Factors, and Treatment Challenges.

Background and objectives: Bullous pemphigoid (BP), the most common subepidermal autoimmune skin blistering disease (AIBD) has an estimated annual incidence of 2.4 to 42.8 new cases per million in different populations, designating it an orphan disease. Characterized by disruption of the skin barrier combined with therapy-induced immunosuppression, BP could pose a risk for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare necrotizing skin and soft tissue infection, with a prevalence of 0.40 cases per 100,000 to 15.5 cases per 100,000 population, often associated with immunosuppression. Low incidences of NF and BP classify them both as rare diseases, possibly contributing to the false inability of making a significant correlation between the two. Here, we present a systematic review of the existing literature related to the ways these two diseases correlate. Materials and methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature review was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE), Google Scholar, and SCOPUS databases. The primary outcome was prevalence of NF in BP patients, while the secondary outcome was prevalence and mortality of SSTI in BP patients. Due to the scarcity of data, case reports were also included. Results: A total of 13 studies were included, six case reports of BP complicated by NF with six retrospective studies and one randomized multicenter trial of SSTIs in BP patients. Conclusions: Loss of skin integrity, immunosuppressive therapy, and comorbidities commonly related to BP patients are risk factors for necrotizing fasciitis. Evidence of their significant correlation is emerging, and further studies are deemed necessary for the development of BP-specific diagnostic and treatment protocols.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotising Fasciitis (LRINEC) based on an 18 years' experience.

BACKGROUND: Necrotising fasciitis (NF) represents a rare but often life-threatening condition. Early diagnosis and surgical treatment are of vital importance. The LRINEC score was developed to distinguish necrotising fasciitis from other soft tissue infections (STI) at initial evaluation using six laboratory values. In this retrospective study, we attempted to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of the LRINEC score. METHODS: A total of 125 patients, hospitalised in our clinic between 2003 and 2021 with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of necrotising fasciitis (NF group) and 319 patients with surgically treated soft tissue infections (STI group) were included in this study. Individual LRINEC scores were calculated and analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the LRINEC score at the cut-off point of ≥ 6 was 59%, whereas the specificity was 82%. The positive and negative predictive values were 57% and 84%, respectively. The mean LRINEC score was significantly higher in the NF group than in the STI group (6.0 compared to 2.4, respectively). All clinical outcome parameters such as amputation and mortality rates (15% vs 1%) were found to be significantly higher in the NF group (p<0.001). Within the NF group, there was no statistically significant association between the LRINEC score and clinical outcomes except for the necessary number of operations. CONCLUSION: In isolation, we found the LRINEC score not to be a reliable enough diagnostic tool for the differentiation between NF and other soft tissue infections, because of its low sensitivity. Although we cannot recommend it as a prognostic tool either, we do believe it can be a useful adjunct to the clinical suspicion of NF.

Risk factors and outcomes in patients with severe Necrotizing fasciitis admitted to surgical intensive Care unit: a retrospective cohort study from pakistan.

Background: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a debilitating condition that has high mortality and morbidity even in specialized centres. This study aims to determine risk factors in our local population and identify variables that contribute to mortality in the necrotizing fasciitis patients treated in the surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 39 patients admitted to the surgical ICU from January 1, 2015 to June 30, 2019. They were analyzed for comorbidities, symptoms at presentation, predisposing factors, location of the infection, microbiological analysis and mortality. Results: There were 27 (69.2%) males and 12 (30.8%) females while the age was distributed as 47.44±15 years. Pain was the most frequently reported symptom (89.7%), followed by swelling (79.5%) and tenderness (77%). Significant predisposing factors included trauma in 14 (35.9%) and Intramuscular injections (IM) in 10 (25.6%) patients. On univariate and multiple logistic regression, patients with chronic kidney disease (AOR:1.27, 95% CI: 0-691.22) and ischemic heart (AOR: 1.55, 95% CI: 0.02-153.26) disease had higher odds of mortality than those with no comorbidity. The overall mortality was 12/39 (30.8%). Conclusion: Intramuscular injections without aseptic measures in our local population are a significant predisposing risk factor for severe necrotizing fasciitis. High laboratory risk Indicators for necrotizing fasciitis and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores at admission were associated with increased mortality.

Necrotizing Fasciitis After Herpes Zoster Infection: A Rare Case With Diagnostic Difficulties.

Necrotizing fasciitis is a rare complication of herpes zoster. Because of its rarity, it may be overlooked in the differential diagnosis of patients with bacterial superinfection on herpes zoster lesions. We present the case of a 59-year-old woman with diabetes mellitus receiving oral antibiotic therapy with the diagnosis of bacterial superinfection due to herpes zoster involving the C7-T8 dermatomes bilaterally. She presented at our emergency department with a deteriorated general condition and signs of sepsis. Her Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score was 10. Necrotizing fasciitis can arise from herpes zoster lesions. However, its rarity can lead to delayed treatment which can further result in significant morbidity, and even mortality, and should be considered among patients presenting with bacterial superinfections. The LRINEC score is very effective and practical for differentiating necrotizing fasciitis from bacterial superinfections. In case of suspicion, follow-up must be conducted on an inpatient basis.

Necrotizing fasciitis in Indonesian adult with diabetes mellitus: Two case and review article.

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare and life-threatening form of infection involving rapidly spreading inflammation and extensive necrosis of the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and superficial fascia. CASE PRESENTATION: This study reported two cases of NF in a 56-year-old female and a 38-year-old male who demonstrated typical signs and symptoms of NF. Both presented to the hospital with skin necrosis in the lower extremity, sepsis shock, and multiorgan failure. Based on the clinical presentation, physical examination, and additional examination, a diagnosis of NF was made. The LRINEC score was used to distinguish NF from other soft tissue infections. Both patients were treated with empirical antibiotics, surgical debridement and planned to be amputated, but the patients were hemodynamically unstable and passed away before the amputation proceeded. DISCUSSION: Delay in the diagnosis of NF increases the risk of mortality and the use of the LRINEC score is very helpful in decision making for health workers. CONCLUSION: The key to the management of NF is early diagnosis, debridement, removal of necrotic tissue, amputation, and use of empirical antibiotics.

Necrotizing fasciitis of the extremities in high and low Charlson Comorbidity Index: A multi-center retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a life-threatening and acute progressive soft tissue infection and needs early surgical intervention, that is, debridement or amputation. Surgical strategy or prognosis is influenced by the speed of progression and patients' general condition, which can be calculated by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the CCI scores and prognosis of patients with NF of the upper/lower extremities. METHODS: In the retrospective cohort study, we analyzed patients with NF of the upper/lower extremities who were determined to undergo surgery by orthopedic surgeons at four tertiary hospitals between August 2003 and April 2016. We divided the patients into two groups, Group L (low CCI scores of 0-2) and Group H (high CCI scores of ≥3). The primary event of this study was defined as death or amputation. Mortality cases were included when amputation was informed with documented certification but patients died while waiting for surgery. We compared the patients' background, laboratory data on admission, the laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC) score, and primary outcome between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 56 patients, 28 patients were classified into Group L and the other 28 patients into Group H. The data in this study showed that patients in Group H had lower white blood cell counts and hemoglobin and higher creatinine than Group L, but there was no difference in LRINEC scores between the two groups. Streptococcus pyogenes was the most common infectious agent in Group L (54%) but not in Group H (11%). Poorer outcome was observed in Group H compared with Group L (4 mortality and 16 amputation vs. no mortality and 9 amputation, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory data and causative microorganisms were different between high CCI and low CCI patients with NF. High CCI scores were associated with limb amputation or death caused by NF of the upper/lower extremities; whereas, low CCI scores were more likely associated with S. pyogenes monoinfection.

Necrotizing soft tissue infection: clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and management of 32 cases in Beijing.

OBJECTIVE: Necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) is a rare but life-threatening bacterial infection. This study was performed to analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with NSTI admitted to the intensive care unit of a trauma and burn center in Beijing and to summarize the treatment experience. METHODS: This retrospective study involved patients with NSTI admitted to the intensive care unit from January 2010 to January 2020. The clinical manifestations, pathogens, laboratory test results, and prognosis were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled (28 men, 4 women), including 25 (78.1%) survivors and 7 (21.9%) nonsurvivors. The patients' median age was 41.5 years (range, 30.0-52.5 years). Mortality was significantly higher in patients with a blood urea nitrogen concentration of ≥11.5 mg/dL, creatinine concentration of <3.4 mg/dL, prothrombin time of ≥15.9 s, and international normalized ratio of ≥1.3. Streptococcus pyogenes and Clostridium perfringens infections were associated with higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: More attention should be given to elderly patients and those with hyponatremia, coagulation disorder, and higher blood urea nitrogen or creatinine concentrations. The finding of large gram-positive rods or large numbers of gram-positive cocci in wound secretion smears is a helpful early warning sign of highly lethal NSTI.

[Saddle Bruise From Mountainbiking - Just a Trifle?] / Sattelprellung beim Mountainbiken ­ bloss eine Bagatelle?

Saddle Bruise From Mountainbiking - Just a Trifle? Abstract. Using the term of behavioral psychology, this review with case report illustrates how a necrotisizing fasciitis following a blunt soft tissue trauma got misinterpreted as pulmonary embolism. In addition to the most important red flags we describe the typical course of disease and provide relevant tools to differentiate upatient between minor ailments and this life-threatening disease on first presentation of the patient.

Necrotizing fasciitis of the upper extremity: a retrospective analysis of 19 cases.

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is both a limb-and life-threatening disease that affects skin, hypodermis as well as superficial fascia and deep fascia by rapidly progressive necrosis. Although this serious infection frequently occurs in the extremities, upper limb NF is a rare clinical presentation. The present study attempted to evaluate the clinical profiles, paraclinical findings, treatment modalities, outcomes and predictors of morbidity and mortality in patients with NF of the upper extremity. The validity of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotising Fasciitis (LRINEC) scoring system was also assessed. Nineteen patients who were treated between January 2010 and December 2019 for NF of the upper extremity were eligible for this study. Data including demographics, clinical signs, paraclinical findings, treatment and outcomes were collected retrospectively from our medical records. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze predictive factors for mortality and morbidity. The mean age was 62 years, with a male predominance. The most common comorbidity was diabetes mellitus (42%). Main clinical manifestations were pain (79%), tense edema (79%) and a large infiltrated swollen erythematous plaque (58%). Severe sepsis and septic shock were identified in 32% and 21% of patients, respectively. Thirteen of our 19 patients (68%) were identified as having a high or intermediate likelihood of NF based of the LRINEC scoring system, while the other 6 (32%) were classified as having low likelihood. All patients received systemic broad spectrum antibiotic therapy in addition to surgical debridement. Two patients (10%) died and one (5%) required amputation. Mortality was associated with septic shock (p = 0.006), delay in surgery >24 h (p = 0.018), creatininemia >141 mmol/l (p = 0.018) and LRINEC score ≥ 8 (p = 0.035). Otherwise, anemia (p = 0.021), hypercreatininemia (p = 0.001) and delayed surgical debridement (p = 0.001) were risk factors for morbidity and mortality. The surviving patients underwent reconstructive surgery (skin grafting after wound preparation by using vacuum therapy) with positive outcome. Early diagnosis coupled with emergent surgical debridement and broad-spectrum empiric antibiotic therapy are the keystones of a successful outcome. The LRINEC score was not strongly correlated to the true diagnosis of NF and was a prognostic tool rather than a diagnostic one.

The combined score of quick SOFA and the charlson comorbidity index could be a poor prognostic indicator for in-hospital mortality among patients with necrotizing fasciitis.

INTRODUCTION: While necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare but rapidly progressive devastating soft tissue infectious disease showing a high in-hospital mortality rate of 20-30%, there are no evidence-based predictive tools. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the purpose of examining which predictive tools could correctly reflect the severity and prognosis of NF, we retrospectively reviewed all patients who were diagnosed with NF at our institute. The disease severity was evaluated by quick SOFA (qSOFA), SOFA score, SIRS score, APACHE II score, LRINEC score and the combined score of qSOFA and CCI. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 68 years (range 39-96 years). With respect to the predictive values for in-hospital mortality among NF patients, the area under the ROC curve for qSOFA, SOFA score, APACHE II score, the combined score of qSOFA and CCI were 0.653 (p = 0.192), 0.588 (p = 0.12), 0.709 (p = 0.075) and 0.782 (p = 0.016) respectively. A univariate analysis showed that the combined score of qSOFA and CCI≥5 and the initial treatment failure were poor prognostic indicators for the in-hospital death among NF patients. The appropriate cut-offs of qSOFA and CCI were based on the Youden Index. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the combined score of qSOFA and CCI could reflect the severity and prognosis of NF for in-hospital death.

Predictive ability of LRINEC score in the prediction of limb loss and mortality in diabetic foot infection.

It was aimed to analyze the effectiveness of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score in predicting amputation and mortality in diabetic foot infection (DFI). Data of 416 patients who were hospitalized for DFI were recorded retrospectively. LRINEC scores were calculated for each patient from laboratory data. The diagnostic performance of LRINEC score was investigated in amputated/nonamputated and survived/deceased patient groups. Median LRINEC score of patients who underwent amputation was higher than those without amputation (P < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) value for LRINEC score was 0.638 with the cut-off point of ≥5 in predicting amputation. Median LRINEC score of deceased patients was higher than those who survived (P= 0.022). AUC value for LRINEC score was 0.663 with the cut-off point of ≥7 in predicting mortality. LRINEC score may be a promising scoring system in predicting both amputation and mortality in DFI.

Usefulness of serum procalcitonin for necrotizing fasciitis as an early diagnostic tool.

INTRODUCTION: While the early diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is crucial and could lead to a favorable outcome, it is difficult to differentiate NF from cellulitis, resulting in delay for the appropriate treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the purpose of examining which diagnostic tools could correctly differentiate NF from cellulitis, we conducted this case-control study. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who were diagnosed with NF at our institute during 2014-2019. The patients who were diagnosed with cellulitis were randomly selected during the study period as the control group. The severity of NF is evaluated by serum-procalcitonin (PCT), LRINEC score, NTSI assessment and SIARI score. RESULTS: A total of 25 NF patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 68 years (range 39-79) and 18 (72%) were male. Comparing NF and cellulitis groups, NF group showed a higher LRINEC score and serum PCT than cellulitis group did, even though there was no statistical significance in serum PCT. With respect to the diagnostic value for differentiating NF from cellulitis, the area under the ROC curve for of serum PCT and LRINEC scores were 0.928 [95% confidential interval (CI) 0.864-0.992, p < 0.001] and 0.846 (95% CI 0.757-0.936, p < 0.001). The appropriate serum-PCT cutoff value was 1.0 and had a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 89%, a positive predictive value of 81%, and a negative predictive value of 93%. CONCLUSION: Serum-PCT could be a useful diagnostic marker for differentiating diagnosis of NF from cellulitis.