Comparative evaluation of hard and soft tissue parameters by using short implants and standard long implants with sinus lift for prosthetic rehabilitation of posterior maxilla.

Objective: The objective is to compare and evaluate the hard and soft tissue parameters by using short and standard long implants with sinus lifting in the posterior maxilla. Materials and Methods: Eleven patients with complaints of missing upper back teeth were enrolled in the study for implant-supported rehabilitation and were categorized into two groups: Group long (GL): longer implant (>8 mm) placement, preceded by Sinus Augmentation. Group short (GS): short implant (≤8 mm) placement, without sinus augmentation. The primary outcome measured was cumulative survival rate (CSR) in the compromised partial edentulous posterior maxilla. Secondary outcomes measured were implant stability (IS), marginal bone level alterations (MBL), pocket probing depth (PPD), crown-to-implant ratio, and any complications. Results: The difference in CSR between the groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.317). High stability was achieved immediately after the placement of the implants, in both groups (GS: 64 ± 4.07, GL: 65.58 ± 9.75); this difference in the mean ISQ (IS quotients) values was not found to be statistically significant at implant placement (P = 0.7). The mean MBL reported in the study at the end of 12 months of prosthesis function was - 0.762 ± 0.48 mm and - 0.7 ± 0.34 mm for GS and GL, respectively. The mean PPD measurements in GS and GL groups were 1.917 ± 0.68 mm and 1.833 ± 0.38 mm, respectively, and it was not statistically significant (P = 0.8). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, the obtained results indicate that short implants provided a similar clinical and radiographic performance compared to long implants placed in combination with a sinus augmentation procedure (lateral window) up to 12 months after prosthetic loading.

Effect of supracrestal tissue height on marginal bone level changes at platform-switching dental implants placed crestally and subcrestally: A randomized clinical-trial.

OBJECTIVES: The presence of insufficient peri-implant supracrestal tissue height (STH) may increase marginal bone resorption. This study aims to evaluate the effect of STH on marginal bone level changes (ΔMBC) in platform-switching posterior implants placed crestally and subcrestally. METHODS: A total of 80 implants were included in this study. There were two main groups in the study; STH≤2 mm (A) and STH> 2 mm (B) and four subgroups according to the implant placement level, crestally (I) and subcrestally (II): A-I, A-II, B-I, and B-II. Intraoperatively, STH and placement depths of implants were measured from mesial and distal aspects. The mesial and distal peri-implant marginal bone levels were measured on periapical radiographs at immediately (T0), 6 months (T1), 9 months (T2), and 12 months (T3) after functional loading, and the difference between the marginal bone levels was calculated as the ΔMBC. RESULTS: Statistically significantly more mesial ΔMBC was detected in the A-I than in the B-I at the time of T0-T1. In the group with STH greater than 2 mm, the difference in ΔMBC between the crestally and subcrestally placements was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study was found that STH is effective at protecting the marginal bone in the early period, and in cases where the STH is insufficient, subcrestally placement may increase long-term implant success by preventing marginal bone loss from occurring beyond the implant shoulder. The clinical trial number is NCT05595746. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: In this study, it was demonstrated that an STH greater than 2 mm is important for marginal bone stabilization, regardless of crestal and subcrestal levels, and that subcrestally placement is beneficial in cases of insufficient STH.

Immediate Placement and Loading of Maxillary Single-Tooth with Scalloped Shape Implants and Digitalized Customized Restoration: A 5-Year Prospective Study of Marginal Bone Level.

PURPOSE: To evaluate, within a period of 5 years, the bone level in mesial, distal, palatal, and buccal areas around scalloped shape implants immediately placed and loaded with temporary crowns fixed on final prefabricated abutments, and also to evaluate the thickness of buccal bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 18 implants were inserted and loaded immediately using computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing technology on 18 patients to replace single tooth in the esthetic part of the maxilla. The marginal bone level across the scalloped implant neck was measured mesially and distally using intraoral standardized radiographs after crown fixations and 1, 3, and 5 years later. Cone beam computed tomography para-axial cuts images were used to measure bone level buccally and palatally from the implant neck to the implant-to bone contact after 5 years of loading and to evaluate the thickness of the buccal bone at the implant neck and 4 mm apically, immediately after implant placement and 5 years later. RESULTS: All implants were assessed clinically and radiologically after 5 years. No implant failure was recorded, and the average marginal bone variation on mesial and distal sites was 0.114 ± 0.135 mm at crown cementation, 0.239 ± 0.158 mm 1 year later, 0.233 ± 0.182 mm 3 years later, and 0.180 ± 0.182 mm 5 years later. Our findings indicate that at T0, the average thickness of the buccal bone was 2.27 mm at implant neck M0 (ranging from 1.9 to 2.4) and 2.33 mm at 4 mm apically to the implant neck M1 (ranging from 1.9 mm to 2.9 mm). By T4, the mean had decreased to 1.94 mm at M0 (with a range of 1.7 mm to 2.3 mm) and 2.14 mm at M1 (with a range of 1.8 mm to 2.4 mm). After 5 years the mean changes at buccal and palatal bone for all implants were +0.187 ± 0.52 mm and +0.06 ± 0.38 mm respectively. Minor prosthetic problems were observed over the five years: incisal ceramic chipping occurred in two crowns, and two crowns were replaced for esthetic reasons after one year. No loosening of crowns or abutments was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Scalloped neck implants demonstrated a comparable behavior to regular neck implants with similar designs in an immediate implantation and temporization protocol over a five-year period.

Influence of an allogenic collagen scaffold on implant sites with thin supracrestal tissue height: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: This randomized clinical trial focused on patients with thin peri-implant soft-tissue height (STH) (≤ 2.5 mm) and investigated the impact of an allogenic collagen scaffold (aCS) on supracrestal tissue height and marginal bone loss (MBL). MATERIAL & METHODS: Forty patients received bone level implants and were randomly assigned to the test group with simultaneous tissue thickening with aCS or the control group. After three months, prosthetic restoration occurred. STH measurements were taken at baseline (T0) and reopening surgery (TR), with MBL assessed at 12 months (T1). Descriptive statistics were calculated for continuous variables, and counts for categorical variables (significance level, p = 0.05). RESULTS: At T1, 37 patients were available. At T0, control and test groups had mean STH values of 2.3 ± 0.3 mm and 2.1 ± 0.4 mm. TR revealed mean STH values of 2.3 ± 0.2 mm (control) and 2.6 ± 0.7 mm (test), with a significant tissue thickening of 0.5 ± 0.6 mm in the test group (p < 0.03). At T1, control and test groups showed MBL mean values of 1.1 ± 0.8 mm and 1.0 ± 0.6 mm, with a moderate but significant correlation with STH thickening (-0.34), implant position (0.43), history of periodontitis (0.39), and smoking status (0.27). CONCLUSION: The use of an aCS protocol resulted in soft tissue thickening but did not reach a threshold to reliably reduce MBL compared to the control group within the study's limitations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Peri-implant STH is crucial for maintaining peri-implant marginal bone stability. Marginal bone stability represents a crucial factor in prevention of peri-implantitis development. German register of clinical trial registration number DRKS00033290.

Immediate Loading Using the Digitalized Customized Restoration of Single-tooth Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets in the Aesthetic Anterior Maxilla: A 10-Year Prospective Study of Marginal Bone Level.

AIM: The objective of this study was to assess marginal bone level around single implants inserted in fresh extraction sockets in the anterior maxillary region and instantly restored with computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing customized temporary crowns cemented on the final abutment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients (15 females and 5 males, with a mean age of 30 years), where 20 were placed in fresh extraction sockets. After raising a full-thickness flap, atraumatic extraction was performed the implant site was prepared and fixtures were stabilized on the palatal bone wall. The implant location was immediately transmitted to the prepared master model using the pick-up impression coping seated in the surgical guide template. Prefabricated abutments were used as the final abutment on the master model, scanned and the crown was planned using computer-aided manufacturing customized software. Later on 8th weeks, abutments were torqued as per the manufacturer's recommendation, and the final crowns were cemented. Using personalized intraoral radiographs marginal bone level was evaluated mesially and distally to the implant shoulder as a reference at implant placement, 8 weeks, 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after loading. RESULTS: Wholly implants were osteo-integrated positively after 10 years of practical loading, but only 18 were available for clinical and radiological follow-up, and 2 patients with two implants were excluded from the study due to relocation abroad without any implant failure. The average marginal bone loss (MBL) in the current report was 0.16 ± 0.167 mm at crown cementation, 0.275 ± 0.171 mm after 1 year, 0.265 ± 0.171 mm after 3 years, 0.213 ± 0.185 mm after 5 years, and 0.217 ± 0.194 mm at 10 years. CONCLUSION: The strategy of inserting and not removing the final abutment at the time of implant placement facilitates the establishment of adequate attachment of both soft and hard tissues to the abutment surface, ensuring uninterrupted organization of tissue architecture and offers advantages in helping maintain soft tissue maturation and preventing marginal bone level. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Immediately loaded implants in freshly extracted sockets lead to a significant reduction in marginal ridge resorption. The use of a temporary crown on a prefabricated abutment, exclusive of successive abutment manipulation, proved effective in preserving the primarily founding blood clot and served as a prototype for shaping the soft tissue around the previously wounded gum. How to cite this article: Berberi A, El Zoghbi A, Aad G, et al. Immediate Loading Using the Digitalized Customized Restoration of Single-tooth Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets in the Aesthetic Anterior Maxilla: A 10-Year Prospective Study of Marginal Bone Level. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(3):213-220.

Bone-Level Tapered Implants for Single Tooth Replacement: Immediate vs Delayed Placement-A Multicenter Randomized Controlled, 1-Year, Non-inferiority Clinical Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of immediate and delayed implant placement with bone-level tapered implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this post-market, multicenter prospective randomized controlled study with a primary endpoint of 1 year, 53 patients were randomized to receive either immediate implant placement (test group) or delayed implant placement (control group). The mean crestal bone level changes from implant loading to 12 months postloading were measured using standardized digital periapical radiographs. Changes in facial plate thickness (as measured on CBCT images), implant success and survival, implant stability, soft tissue changes, patient-centered outcomes, and adverse events were measured to assess outcomes between the test and control treatments at 12 months postloading. RESULTS: Of the original 53 patients, 46 patients completed the study (23 in each group). Mean bone changes from loading to the 12-month follow-up were recorded with no statistically significant difference (P = .950) between the groups. The hypothesis was confirmed that immediate implant placement (test) in extraction sockets produces in similar outcomes as delayed placement (control). The test group was found to be similar to the control group (P = .022) in terms of mean changes in facial plate thickness. Implant survival and success were 95.8% in the test group and 92% in the control group. Stability in the control group was superior at the time of surgery, but there was no difference between the groups at implant loading, producing a nonsignificant P value of .563). CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled multicenter study showed comparable outcomes 1 year after prosthetic loading in the immediate and delayed implant placement groups.

Radiographic Evaluation Factors That Influence the Decision of the Tooth Extraction Method.

INTRODUCTION: A simple tooth extraction method usually involves using elevators and forceps to remove the tooth easily. In contrast, a surgical extraction method requires utilizing a straight handpiece to facilitate the tooth extraction, either removing bone or sectioning the tooth into pieces. OBJECTIVE: In this research, we aim to diagnose a tooth radiographically before extraction and determine certain factors to observe which extraction method might be more feasible, either simple or surgical. METHODOLOGY: This study followed a retrospective cross-sectional study design. The x-ray radiographs (periapical (PA) or panoramic) were collected from the R4 system in the university dental hospital for data collection. Different radiographic influencing factors were measured, such as bone density, bone level, endodontic involvement (RCT/post and core), crowned or remaining root, and root morphology. Statistical associations were performed using SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) with a one-way ANOVA test. RESULTS: There were 62 cases with 47 simple and 15 surgical extractions. There was a non-significant (p>0.05) association between the measured factors and the extraction method, either simple or surgical tooth extraction. Although bone density measurements showed a slight tendency toward PA lesions and simple tooth extraction. CONCLUSION: There was no significant association between the factors and extraction methods. Future research is required to determine whether or not preoperative radiographic evaluation can influence the decision for the tooth extraction method.

IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH A SIMULTANEOUS BONE AUGMENTATION OF THE GAP-FILLING SITES CAN POTENTIALLY DECREASE BONE LOSS COMPARED WITH AUGMENTED SITES EXHIBITING GAPS WITH BONY DEFECTS.

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: Marginal bone level change of immediately restored implants with simultaneous guided bone regeneration: A systematic review. Lin, X., Yu, X., Wang, F., & Wu, Y. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2023. SOURCE OF FUNDING: CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS), Grant/Award Number: 2019-I2M- 5-037; Clinical Research Plan of SHDC, Grant/Award Number: SHDC2020CR3049B; Huangpu District Industrial Support Fund, Grant/Award Number: XK2020014; Research Discipline Fund, Grant/Award Number: KQYJXK2020. TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN: Systematic review.

Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels around implants supporting splinted fixed bridges: A retrospective study on 412 implants.

OBJECTIVES: The effect of the implant position within the prosthesis on bone remodeling is scarcely documented so far. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate whether central implants may suffer higher peri-implant marginal bone levels (MBL) compared to laterals in case of fixed splinted bridges supported by ≥ three implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Partially edentulous subjects rehabilitated with at least one fixed bridge supported by ≥ three dental implants were enrolled. MBL was assessed radiographically by means of intraoral radiographs acquired with phosphor plates and imported in a dedicated software. MBL was calculated as the distance between the implant platform level and the most coronal visible bone-to-implant contact. A three-level linear mixed effects model was used for investigating the fixed effect of patient-, prosthesis-, and implant-level variables on the MBL. RESULTS: Overall, 90 patients rehabilitated with 130 splinted fixed bridges supported by 412 implants were included. The median follow-up was 136 months. The mean peri-implant MBL resulted statistically significantly higher at central implants if compared to lateral implants (p < .01). The estimated MBL averages for central and external implants were 1.68 and 1.18 mm, respectively. The prosthesis-level variables suggested that a cement-retained bridge was prone to a significant 0.82 mm higher MBL than a screw-retained one. Implant surface showed an association with MBL changes, although less pronounced than implant retention. CONCLUSIONS: In case of ≥3 adjacent implants supporting splinted bridges, central implants were more predisposed to MBL compared to laterals. At the prosthesis level, implants supporting cement-retained bridges were statistically more susceptible to MBL compared to screw-retained ones. Surface characteristics can also influence MBL stability at the implant level.

A Multicenter Cohort Study on 301 Tissue-Level Implants: Cumulative Implant Survival Rate and Marginal Bone Level Change up to 4.5 Years.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the cumulative survival rate (CSR) and marginal bone level change (ΔMBL) around novel hybrid design tissue-level (TL) dental implants that support multiple-screw-retained restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implant CSRs were analyzed at the implant and patient level using Kaplan-Meier estimates. ΔMBL was measured by comparing the periapical loading and follow-up visit radiographs using an improved standardized digital methodology based on image gray levels. ΔMBL outcomes were subject to linear mixed regression to identify potential risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 301 TL implants in 69 patients with an average age of 62.6 ± 11.7 years (range: 36 to 87 years) at the time of implant placement were considered for the analysis. All 301 implants were successfully restored and loaded. The 54-month CSRs at the implant and patient levels were 98.9% (95% CI: 96.7 to 99.6) and 95.3% (95% CI: 86.1 to 98.5), respectively. ΔMBL after a mean follow-up of 22 ± 10.7 months after loading was 0.00 ± 0.57 mm. None of the implant sites showed marginal bone loss exceeding 1.5 mm. Multivariate regression analysis revealed a significant association between ΔMBL and the loading protocol (P = .027) but not between ΔMBL and age or transgingival height. CONCLUSIONS: The high CSRs and stable peri-implant marginal bone levels support the use of recent TL implants, which have a hybrid design inherited from the bone-level implant-abutment connection, as a suitable treatment option for restoring partially or fully edentulous patients with a good mid-term prognosis. These results should be complemented by further prospective studies in a real-world multicenter private practice setup that represents the daily realities of implant treatment.

Survival and complication rates of two dental implant systems supporting fixed restorations: 10-year data of a randomized controlled clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical, radiographic, biological and technical long-term outcomes of two types of dental implants over a period of 10 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-eight implants were placed in 64 patients, randomly allocated to one of two manufacturers (AST and STM). All implants were loaded with fixed restorations. Outcome measures were assessed at implant insertion (Ti), at baseline examination (TL), at 1, 3, 5, 8 and 10 (T10) years. Data analysis included survival, bone level changes, complications and clinical measures. RESULTS: Re-examination was performed in 43 patients (23 AST and 20 STM) at 10 years. The implant level analysis was based on 37 (AST) and 32 (STM) implants. Survival rates of 100% were obtained for both groups. The median changes of the marginal bone levels between baseline and T10 (the primary endpoint) amounted to a loss of 0.07 mm for group AST and a gain of 0.37 mm for group STM (intergroup p = 0.008). Technical complications occurred in 27.0% of the implants in group AST and in 15.6% in group STM. The prevalence of peri-implant mucositis was 29.7% (AST) and 50.1% (STM). The prevalence of peri-implantitis amounted to 0% (AST) and 6.3% (STM). CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the implant system used, the survival rates after 10 years were high. Minimal bone level changes were observed, statistically significant but clinically negligible in favor of STM. Technical complications were more frequently encountered in group AST, while group STM had a higher prevalence of peri-implant mucositis.

Extra-short implants (≤ 6.5 mm in length) in atrophic and non-atrophic sites to support screw-retained full-arch restoration: a retrospective clinical study.

PURPOSE: Increasing scientific evidence support extending the application of short dental implants to non-atrophic dental arches. The purpose of this study has been the evaluation of extra-short implants (≤ 6.5 mm in length) that were placed in atrophic and non-atrophic anatomical sites to support the same prosthesis. METHODS: For that, a retrospective study was conducted by including complete dentures that were solely supported by extra-short implants in the maxilla and/or the mandible. Clinical data about patients, implants, anatomy, and prosthesis were obtained. Statistical analysis was performed to assess implant- and prosthesis-survival, changes in the marginal bone level and prosthetic complications. RESULTS: A total of 87 implants in 15 screw-retained complete dentures were assessed. None of the prostheses nor the extra-short implant failed during the follow-up of 27.2 ± 15.4 months. The changes in the mesial and distal marginal bone level were + 0.15 ± 0.51 mm and + 0.11 ± 0.50 mm, respectively. Comparing the implants according to the availability of sufficient bone to place longer implants, indicated the absence of significant differences in the changes of the mesial marginal bone level. However, the changes in the distal marginal bone level showed a statistically significant difference in favor of implants that were placed in non-atrophic sites. Two events of screw loosening were reported that were resolved by retightening the screws. CONCLUSIONS: Implant- and prosthesis-related outcomes support the use of extra-short implants in atrophic and non-atrophic site to support complete prosthesis.

Evaluation of the clinical safety and performance of a narrow diameter (2.9 mm) bone-level implant: a 1-year prospective single-arm multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Narrow-diameter implants facilitate single-tooth restoration when interdental or inter-implant spaces and bone volume are inadequate for using standard diameter implants. This study reports the short-term data on the clinical safety and performance of a bone-level-tapered two-piece implant with a 2.9 mm diameter in the clinical practice setting. This study was retrospectively registered on March 1st, 2016 (NCT02699866). METHODS: Implants were placed in partially healed extraction sockets of the central and lateral incisors in the mandible and lateral incisors in the maxilla for single-tooth replacement. The primary outcome was to assess implant survival at 12 months after placement. Secondary outcomes included implant success, pink esthetic score, marginal bone-level changes, and safety. RESULTS: Twenty four males and 17 females with a mean age of 44.5 (± 18.3 standard deviation) received the implant. Three out of 41 implants were lost yielding a survival rate of 92.7% (95%-CI: 79.0%; 97.6%) at 1 year. One patient reported an ongoing foreign body sensation, pain, and/or dysesthesia at month 12. The average pink esthetic score at 6 months was 11.2 (95%-CI: 10.5; 11.9). The bone level was stable with a mean bone-level change of-0.3 mm (± 0.42 mm standard deviation) at 1 year after implantation. No serious adverse events or adverse device events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a 2.9 mm diameter bone-level-tapered implant is a safe and reliable treatment option for narrow tooth gaps at the indicated locations. Overall performance and good survival rates support their use in cases, where wider implants are unsuitable.

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Level (BL) in Two Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture With Lingualized Occlusion (LO): A Six-Year Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND:  The objective of this research was to assess the marginal bone loss and stability in a lingualized occlusal scheme with implant-supported mandibular overdentures as a viable solution for individuals experiencing difficulties with the retention of conventional mandibular dentures. The study assessed the marginal bone level (BL) using radiographic evaluation and clinically by evaluating periodontal health using probing depth index values over a period of 6 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  Ten completely edentulous male patients with a bone height (BH) of 15-25 mm at the mandibular symphyseal region and dissatisfaction with their mandibular conventional complete denture were included in the study. Patients were willing to accept the conditions of the study and provide informed consent. Bleeding index, plaque index (PI), probing depth, and crestal BL were accessed during the follow-up period. Marginal BLs using Wical and Swoop Analysis method were evaluated at baseline (BL) (during loading), 3 years and 6 years post-loading. RESULTS:  During the observation period, there was no incidence of implant loss, and all patients expressed contentment with the retention, stability, chewing functionality, and esthetic appeal of their dentures. Marginal BLs through clinical and radiographic evaluation, periodontal health using bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing depth were assessed during the follow-up period. Throughout the entire period of observation, no instances of implant displacement were detected. CONCLUSION:  The study found that the use of a lingualized occlusal scheme with two implant-retained mandibular complete overdenture effectively transmitted horizontal loads, reduced stress on individual implants leading to decreased bone loss, and increased stability.

The effect of different abutment materials on peri-implant tissues-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: In patients with dental implants, what is the effect of transmucosal components made of materials other than titanium (alloys) compared to titanium (alloys) on the surrounding peri-implant tissues after at least 1 year? MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review included eligible randomized controlled trials identified through an electronic search (Medline, Embase and Web of Science) comparing alternative abutment materials versus titanium (alloy) abutments with a minimum follow-up of 1 year and including at least 10 patients/group. Primary outcomes were peri-implant marginal bone level (MBL) and probing depth (PD), these were evaluated based on meta-analyses. Abutment survival, biological and technical complications and aesthetic outcomes were the secondary outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed with the RoB2-tool. This review is registered in PROSPERO with the number (CRD42022376487). RESULTS: From 5129 titles, 580 abstracts were selected, and 111 full-text articles were screened. Finally, 12 articles could be included. Concerning the primary outcomes (MBL and PD), no differences could be seen between titanium abutment and zirconia or alumina abutments, not after 1 year (MBL: zirconia: MD = -0.24, 95% CI: -0.65 to 0.16, alumina: MD = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.29 to 0.17) (PD: zirconia: MD = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.41 to 0.30, alumina: MD = -0.29, 95% CI: -0.96 to 0.38), nor after 5 years. Additionally, no differences were found concerning the biological complications and aesthetic outcomes. The most important technical finding was abutment fracture in the ceramic group and chipping of the veneering material. CONCLUSIONS: Biologically, titanium and zirconia abutments seem to function equally up to 5 years after placement.

Marginal bone level change of immediately restored implants with simultaneous guided bone regeneration: A systematic review.

AIM: To assess marginal bone level change (MBLc), clinical outcomes for soft tissue, and survival rates for immediately restored implants with simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic and manual searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for studies that investigated immediately restored implants in simultaneously grafted sites with a mean follow-up of over 12 months. MBLc was the primary outcome. Soft tissue clinical parameters and implant survival rate (ISR) were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies (5 randomized controlled trials, 6 prospective studies, 2 retrospective studies, and 12 case series) were included, from which 692 immediately restored implants were analyzed. For studies that investigated bone grafts in the gap between the implant and the peripheral bone wall, the weighted mean MBLc was -0.73 ± 1.52 mm (range: -1.50 to 0.26 mm) for 475 implants. Pink esthetic score (PES) was improved in eight studies and the weighted cumulative ISR was 98.99% (Median: 100%) in 622 implants. Mean MBLc was -1.19 ± 0.26 mm for 30 implants in studies that reported gap with dehiscence and/or fenestration augmentation. Weighted cumulative ISR was 97.25% in 70 implants. A meta-analysis was not possible due to the lack of studies with an eligible control group. Therefore, the data should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSION: Less marginal bone loss and more predictable soft tissue parameters can be achieved for immediately restored implants with simultaneous peri-implant gap filling compared with gap with dehiscence/fenestration grafting. Increased ISR for implants with gap filling was observed. However, more evidence is needed to confirm whether immediate provisional prostheses should be utilized when bone defects are simultaneously augmented around the implants.

Ten-Year Performance of Posterior 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The aim of the study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of short dental implants (6-mm test group, TG) to longer implants (10-mm control group, CG) with single crown restorations after 10 y of loading. Patients requiring single-tooth replacement in the posterior jaws were randomly assigned to TG or CG. Implants were loaded with screw-retained single crowns after a healing period of 10 wk. Follow-up appointments were scheduled yearly and comprised patient-adapted oral hygiene reinstructions and polishing of all teeth and implants. After 10 y, clinical and radiographical parameters were assessed again. Out of initially 94 patients (47 in TG and CG, each), 70 (36 TG and 34 CG) could be reassessed. Survival rates accounted for 85.7% (TG) and 97.1% (CG), without significant intergroup difference (P = 0.072). All but 1 lost implant had been located in the lower jaw. These implants were not lost due to peri-implantitis but due to a late loss of osseointegration without signs of inflammation and with actually stable marginal bone levels (MBLs) over the investigation period. In general, MBLs were stable with medians (interquartile ranges) of 0.13 (0.78) mm and 0.08 (1.2) mm, for TG and CG, without significant intergroup differences. Crown-to-implant ratio showed a highly significant intergroup difference of 1.06 ± 0.18 mm and 0.73 ± 0.17 mm (P < 0.001). Few technical complications (i.e., screw loosening or chipping) were registered during the investigation period. In conclusion, given stringent professional maintenance, short dental implants with single-crown restorations show a slightly worse but statistically not different survival rate after 10 y, especially in the lower jaw, but can still be considered a valuable alternative, especially when vertical bone dimensions are limited (German Clinical Trials Registry: DRKS00006290).

Surface Coatings of Dental Implants: A Review.

Replacement of missing teeth is possible using biocompatible devices such as endosseous implants. This study aims to analyze and recognize the best characteristics of different implant surfaces that ensure good peri-implant tissue healing and thus clinical success over time. The present review was performed on the recent literature concerning endosseous implants made of titanium, a material most frequently used because of its mechanical, physical, and chemical characteristics. Thanks to its low bioactivity, titanium exhibits slow osseointegration. Implant surfaces are treated so that cells do not reject the surface as a foreign material and accept it as fully biocompatible. Analysis of different types of implant surface coatings was performed in order to identify ideal surfaces that improve osseointegration, epithelial attachment to the implant site, and overall peri-implant health. This study shows that the implant surface, with different adhesion, proliferation, and spreading capabilities of osteoblastic and epithelial cells, influences the cells involved in anchorage. Implant surfaces must have antibacterial capabilities to prevent peri-implant disease. Research still needs to improve implant material to minimize clinical failure.

Effects of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone level and bone density in non-splinted single implants: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the effects of the crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio on the marginal bone level (MBL) and bone density in non-splinted single implants. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of C/I ratio on MBL and density of peri-implant bone in non-splinted posterior implants. METHODS: The C/I ratio, MBL, and grayscale values (GSVs) for bone density were measured from X-rays. Four areas of interest (two at the apical area and two at the middle of the peri-implant area) and two control areas were selected for evaluation. Follow-up radiographs were calibrated according to the control areas. RESULTS: In all, 117 non-splinted posterior implants in 73 patients followed up for a mean duration of 36.23 ± 10.40 (range 24-72) months were considered. The mean anatomical C/I ratio was 1.78 ± 0.43 (range 0.93 to 3.06). The mean change in MBL was 0.28 ± 0.97 mm. There were no significant associations between the C/I ratio and MBL changes (r = -0.028, p = 0.766). Pearson correlation showed a significant correlation between changes in GSV and the C/I ratio in the middle peri-implant area (r = 0.301, p = 0.001) and apical area (r = 0.247, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: A higher C/I ratio of single non-splinted posterior implants is associated with increased peri-implant bone density, but not correlated with changes in MBL.

Influence of supracrestal tissue height on peri-implant hard and soft tissues of single implants placed in the esthetic area using the one abutment-one time approach: a 1-year prospective interventional study.

OBJECTIVE: This pilot, prospective interventional study aimed to analyze the influence of supracrestal tissue height when using the one abutment-one time concept at the time of implant placement, on peri-implant hard and soft tissue remodeling in esthetic areas. The definitive crown was placed 7 days later. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Facial mucosal margin position, mesial and distal papilla levels, and mesial and distal marginal bone loss were assessed after 7 days (placement of the definitive crown), and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after implant placement. Patients were classified according to the supracrestal tissue height as thin (< 3 mm) and thick (≥ 3 mm). RESULTS: Fifteen patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. Eight presented a thick supracrestal tissue height and seven a thin supracrestal tissue height. After 12 months, the implant success rate was 100%. The mean recession at the facial mucosal margin position was -0.47 ± 0.57 mm and -0.19 ± 0.41 mm in thin and thick groups, respectively (P = .29). The mean mesial papilla level recession was -0.19 ± 0.06 mm in the thin group and -0.01 ± 0.07 mm in the thick group (P < .01), and the mean distal papilla level recession was -0.15 ± 0.09 mm in the thin group and 0.00 ± 0.15 mm in the thick group (P < .05). The mean bone loss was -0.21 ± 0.18 mm and -0.04 ± 0.14 mm in the thin and thick groups, respectively (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Single maxillary anterior implants with thin supracrestal tissue height (< 3 mm) at the time of implant placement had greater bone loss and papillary recession than implants with a thick soft tissue height (≥ 3 mm), even when using the one abutment-one time concept.