Comparative anatomical analysis between lateral supraorbital and minipterional approaches.

Background: The pterional craniotomy, described by Yasargil and Fox in 1975, constitutes the most traditional and important surgical access in vascular neurosurgery. Minimally invasive alternatives include the minipterional (MP) and lateral supraorbital (LSO) craniotomies, which avoid complications such as injury to the frontal branch of the facial nerve, temporal muscle dysfunction, depression of the craniotomy site, frontal sinus opening, and cosmetically unacceptable outcomes. We evaluated and compared the exposures provided by MP and LSO craniotomies through quantitative measurements of the surgical exposure area around the circle of Willis and parasellar regions, as well as angular and linear exposures of the internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation, middle cerebral artery (MCA), midpoint of the anterior communicating artery, and tip of the basilar artery (BA). Methods: Seven fresh cadavers were dissected at the São Paulo Medical Examiner's Office, SP, and three at the skull base laboratory of Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA. The craniotomies were performed sequentially, initially with the LSO craniotomy followed by the MP. After the craniotomy, the surgical exposure area, craniotomy area, and angular exposures in the horizontal and vertical axes were determined. Results: The MP craniotomy provided better angular exposure for the ipsilateral MCA, while the LSO craniotomy and BA provided better vertical axis exposures. The LSO craniotomy provided better angular exposure in the vertical axis for the midpoint of the anterior communicating artery and contralateral ICA bifurcation. Regarding surgical exposure and craniotomy area, there were no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: The MP craniotomy offers a significantly larger surgical exposure compared to the LSO craniotomy, with specific advantages regarding angular exposure to important neurovascular structures. This study provides important quantitative data to guide the choice between these minimally invasive access techniques in vascular neurosurgery.

Estudio comparativo entre la fusión lumbar intersomática por vía oblicua y la fusión lumbar intersomática por vía posterior. Resultados radiográficos y clínicos a corto plazo / Comparison between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Short-term radiographic and clinical results

Introducción. La fusión lumbar intersomática posterior (PLIF, "posterior lumbar interbody fusion") es un procedimiento ampliamente utilizado. En los últimos años, la fusión lumbar intersomática por vía oblicua (OLIF, "oblique lumbar interbody fusión") ha ganado cierta popularidad dado su abordaje mini-invasivo y su capacidad de descompresión indirecta. Objetivo. Comparar retrospectivamente los resultados clínicos y radiológicos de pacientes operados por vía oblicua y por vía posterior a corto plazo.Materiales y métodos. Se reunieron los pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente por vía OLIF y PLIF entre 2020 y 2021. Se dividieron en dos grupos según la vía utilizada y se compararon los datos demográficos y resultados radiográficos entre el preoperatorio y postoperatorio. Se utilizó el cuestionario de Oswestry (ODI) para evaluar la escala de discapacidad por dolor lumbar y se registraron las complicaciones de ambos grupos. Resultados. Sobre 118 pacientes, 56 corresponden a la vía OLIF y 62 al PLIF. Con respecto al ODI, no se registraron diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos previamente ni posterior a la cirugía. El grupo OLIF mostró mejores resultados radiográficos que el grupo PLIF en el posoperatorio, con una diferencia significativa en la lordosis lumbar total (p 0,017). El grupo PLIF mostró un mayor número de complicaciones posoperatorias. Conclusión. La vía OLIF puede ser un método quirúrgico alternativo a la vía posterior tradicional en pacientes con patología degenerativa lumbar. Esta vía permitiría obtener mejores resultados radiográficos con menos complicaciones comparado con la vía tradiciona

Background. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is a widely used method. In recent years, oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) has gained some popularity due to its minimally invasive approach and ability of indirect decompression. Objective. Our objective is to compare retrospectively clinical and radiological results of patients operated by boths techniques in the short term.Materials and methods. Patients who underwent surgery by the OLIF and PLIF between 2020 and 2021 were gathered. They were divided into two groups according to the technique used; and demographic data and radiographic results were compared between the preoperative and postoperative periods. The Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI) was used to assess the low back pain disability; and complications were recorded for both groups. Results. Out of 118 patients, 56 correspond to the OLIF group and 62 to the PLIF group. Regarding the ODI, no significant differences were recorded between the two groups before and after surgery. The OLIF group showed better radiographic results than the PLIF group in the postoperative period, with a significant difference in total lumbar lordosis (p 0.017). The PLIF group showed a higher number of postoperative complications. Conclusion: The OLIF approach can be an alternative surgical method to the traditional posterior approach in patients with lumbar degenerative pathology. This technique would allow obtaining better radiographic results with fewer complications compared to the traditional technique

Robotic Surgery for Bladder Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Women with bladder endometriosis often present with more advanced stages of endometriosis. Robotic surgery has emerged as a promising approach to the management of bladder endometriosis. This systematic review aims to analyze the current literature on robotic surgery for bladder endometriosis and describe our systematic approach to surgical treatment. METHODS: This review followed the PRISMA guidelines, which ensured a comprehensive and transparent approach to selecting and evaluating relevant studies. We conducted a thorough literature search to identify studies that investigated the use of robotic surgery for bladder endometriosis. Relevant databases were searched, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select eligible studies. Data extraction and analysis were performed to assess the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic surgery for the treatment of bladder endometriosis. RESULTS: We did not find any randomized clinical trials with the use of robotics in the treatment of bladder endometriosis. We found only two retrospective studies comparing robotic surgery with laparoscopy, and another retrospective study comparing robotic surgery, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in the treatment of bladder endometriosis. All the other 12 studies were solely case reports. Despite the lack of robust evidence in the literature, the studies demonstrated that robotic surgery is feasible and is associated with reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of robotic technology is a promising option for the surgical management of bladder endometriosis. We advocate a surgical systematic approach for the robotic treatment of bladder endometriosis. Robotic technology, with its 3D vision, instrumental degrees of freedom, and precision, particularly in suturing, may provide potential benefits over traditional laparoscopy.

VAAFT PROCEDURE (Video-assisted Anal Fistula Treatment) versus open method in the treatment of high fistula in ano

Background: A common acquired anorectal condition is anal fistula. The treatment approaches that have been employed have been linked to erratic outcomes and sometimes life-threatening consequences. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT), a minimally invasive method, was introduced for adult patients in 2011. Objective: To know the efficacy of the VAAFT procedure in treating high anal fistulas and to compare it to open methods in the Basrah province. Methods: The present study was performed on 200 patients with high fistulas in ano in Basrah province. We divided the patients into 2 groups: Group A: treated by the VAAFT technique and Group B: treated by open fistulotomy Results: The patients treated with VAFFT revealed no occurrence of the following postoperative complication: Infection, incontinence, recurrence, anal stenosis, and bleeding. There was lower incidence of pain, short time for wound healing, rapid return to work, and more patient satisfaction compared with open fistulotomy Conclusion: An innovative method for managing ano fistula is VAAFT. Compared with traditional methods, it has a lot of benefits. It is day case surgeryno open wound.no damage to anal sphincter and no risk of incontinence, it is more affordable.it allow for clear identification of internal office, whole tract and its associated branches and cavity. The instrument can be used for multiple patients after good sterilization and disinfection. (AU)

Minimal invasive surgery in locally advanced N2 non-small cell lung cancer.

Locally advanced lung cancer, defined by nodal involvement in upper mediastinal stations (N2) (stage IIIA-N2), includes a wide spectrum of patients with multiple therapeutic alternatives. Such heterogeneity is explained, at least in part, by tumor size and magnitude of mediastinal nodal involvement. In this setting, many variants can influence the prognosis, such as the specific nodal stations compromised, the burden of mediastinal disease, and the presence of skip metastasis. In the surgical field, the advent of minimally invasive techniques, including video-assisted thoracoscopic and robotic surgery, have revolutionized the management of early-stage lung cancer, but implementations of these approaches in the locally advanced setting have been erratic. This review attempts to highlight the most relevant scientific data of the surgical management of locally advanced lung cancer patients, analyzing not only the medical evidence but also the cost-effectiveness and accessibility.

Abordaje lateral retropleural mínimamente invasivo para hernia de disco torácica gigante calcificada: reporte de caso / Minimally Invasive Lateral Retropleural Approach for Calcified Giant Thoracic Disc Herniation: Case Report

Introducción: Las hernias de disco torácicas (HDT) representan solo el 0.15-1.8% de las hernias de disco tratadas quirúrgicamente. Se han descrito distintos tipos de abordajes que reportan diferentes índices de éxito y complicaciones. El objetivo es presentar el caso quirúrgico de una HDT resuelta por un abordaje lateral retropleural mínimamente invasivo y exponer las ventajas del mismo. Descripción: Se presenta el caso de una paciente de 29 años, que consultó por dorsalgia y paresia crural izquierda 4/5. La TC y RM mostraron una HDT gigante calcificada T8-9. Bajo monitoreo neurofisiológico y visión microscópica, se realizó un abordaje lateral retropleural izquierdo mínimamente invasivo, con resección parcial de la costilla para luego utilizar un sistema de dilatadores y retractores tubulares. Se confirmó el nivel bajo radioscopía, y se completó con el drilado de la cabeza costal para exponer el espacio y la HDT calcificada de manera precoz. Se realizó la discectomía del fragmento herniado, incluyendo drilado intracanal de la porción calcificada y se completó la descompresión incluyendo la porción posterior de los platillos vertebrales y el pedículo inferior. Parte del fragmento herniado se encontraba íntimamente adherido al saco dural, por lo que creímos conveniente dejar este remanente para evitar complicaciones. La paciente evolucionó favorablemente, recuperando de manera completa el déficit motor y el dolor que motivaron la consulta. Consideramos que no fue necesario realizar ningún tipo de fusión intersomática. Discusión: Los distintos abordajes propuestos tienen sus ventajas y desventajas. El desarrollo de las técnicas mínimamente invasivas sumado a la posibilidad de exponer precozmente la lesión resultan ventajas importantes en estos casos. La necesidad de fusión es un tema controversial, donde la mayoría de los trabajos sugieren que no es mandatoria. Conclusión: el abordaje lateral retropleural mínimamente invasivo es una técnica segura, que permitió una visualización precoz de la HDT sin desplazar el estuche dural y logrando una adecuada descompresión. Además, evita la morbilidad que podría representar la toracotomía transtorácica y la necesidad de fusión

Introduction: Thoracics disc herniations (TDH) represent just 0.15-1.8% of all surgically treated herniated discs. Many approaches had been described with different amount of success and complications. The objective is to present a TDH surgical case using a minimally invasive lateral retropleural approach and describe the advantages of this approach. Case description: we present a 29 years old female who presented with dorsal pain and right leg weakness 4/5. CT and MRi showed a calcified giant TDH T8-9. The surgery was performed under neurophysiological monitoring and using a surgical microscope. A minimally invasive left lateral retropleural approach was performed, with partial resection of a rib. Finally, we used dilators and tubular retractors. After radioscopic confirmation of T8-9, we completed the approach by drilling rib ́s head in order to early expose the spinal canal with the TDH. We resected the herniated fragment of the TDH, drilled the calcified intraspinal canal portion and completed the decompression including the posterior portion of the endplates and the inferior pedicle. The most anterior portion of the TDH was intimately attached to the dural sac, so we decided to leave this remanent in order to avoid complications. The patient had a good postoperative recovery, the leg weakness and pain improved significantly. From our perspective, we consider that no intersomatic fusion was necessary. Discusion: each approach has it advantages and disadvantages. The evolution of minimally invasive techniques together with the early visualization of TDH became important advantages in these cases. The need of fusion remains controversial, and most of the literature suggest that is not mandatory. Conclusión: the minimally invasive lateral retropleural approach is a safe technique that offers an early visualization of the TDH without manipulation of the dural sac and allows an adequate decompression. Furthermore, this approach avoids the morbidity of a transthoracic approach and the requirement of fusion.

[Claudication, functional outcomes and quality of life in primary total hip arthroplasty with minimally invasive anterolateral approach]. / Claudicación, resultados funcionales y calidad de vida en artroplastía total de cadera primaria con abordaje anterolateral mínimamente invasivo.

INTRODUCTION: The coxarthrosis has incidence of 88 cases per 100,000 people/year and symptomatic prevalence of 16% men and 6% women aged 65-74 years and increases with age. It is a growing public health disease. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become the most successful procedure to increase the quality of life of patients with coxarthrosis. Our objective was to determine the claudication, quality of life and functional results of THA through minimal invasive approach in patients with primary coxarthrosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective longitudinal study in patients with unilateral primary coxarthrosis postop of THA with minimally invasive approach from March 2015-February 2016, each patient was analyzed with quality of Life instrument (WOMAC), Functional test for coxarthrosis (HHS) and functional test in patients with hip surgery (OHS) with follow-up of one year. RESULTS: We included 21 patients, 17 female and 4 males corresponding to 80.95% and 19.05% respectively, average age of 59.95 years (ED = 9.64), with excellent functional results to one year according to HHS and OHS, quality of life high in 100% of cases according to WOMAC, with claudication rate of 4.76%. DISCUSSION: The minimal invasive approach is a reproducible surgical technique, with excellent functional results, low claudication rate and high quality of life in postoperative patients of primary ATC at only one year of follow-up.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La coxartrosis tiene incidencia de 88 casos por 100,000 personas/año y prevalencia sintomática de 16% para hombres y 6% para mujeres en edades de 65-74 años e incrementa con la edad. Representa una enfermedad de salud pública que va en aumento, la mujer es quien presenta padecimiento más grave. La ATC (artroplastía total de cadera) se ha convertido en el procedimiento más exitoso para mejorar la calidad de vida de pacientes con coxartrosis. OBJETIVO: Determinar la claudicación, calidad de vida y resultados funcionales de la ATC mediante abordaje mínimo invasivo en pacientes con coxartrosis primaria. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio longitudinal y prospectivo en pacientes con coxartrosis primaria unilateral postoperados de ATC primaria con técnica mínimamente invasiva en el período comprendido de Marzo de 2015 a Febrero de 2016, se analizó a cada paciente con somatometría, calidad de vida (WOMAC), funcionalidad en pacientes con coxartrosis (HHS) y funcionalidad en pacientes con cirugía de cadera (OHS) de manera prequirúrgica y postquirúrgica con seguimiento a un año. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 21 pacientes, 17 femeninos y cuatro masculinos que corresponde a 80.95 y 19.05%, respectivamente, edad promedio de 59.95 años (DE = 9.64), con resultados funcionales excelentes a un año, según escalas de HHS y OHS, calidad de vida alta en 100% de los casos según WOMAC, con índice de claudicación bajo de 4.76%. DISCUSIÓN: El abordaje mínimo invasivo es una técnica quirúrgica reproducible con resultados funcionales excelentes, índice de claudicación baja y alta calidad de vida en pacientes postoperados de ATC primaria durante el primer año de seguimiento.

Claudicación, resultados funcionales y calidad de vida en artroplastía total de cadera primaria con abordaje anterolateral mínimamente invasivo / Claudication, functional outcomes and quality of life in primary Total hip arthroplasty with minimally invasive anterolateral approach

Resumen: Introducción: La coxartrosis tiene incidencia de 88 casos por 100,000 personas/año y prevalencia sintomática de 16% para hombres y 6% para mujeres en edades de 65-74 años e incrementa con la edad. Representa una enfermedad de salud pública que va en aumento, la mujer es quien presenta padecimiento más grave. La ATC (artroplastía total de cadera) se ha convertido en el procedimiento más exitoso para mejorar la calidad de vida de pacientes con coxartrosis. Objetivo: Determinar la claudicación, calidad de vida y resultados funcionales de la ATC mediante abordaje mínimo invasivo en pacientes con coxartrosis primaria. Material y métodos: Estudio longitudinal y prospectivo en pacientes con coxartrosis primaria unilateral postoperados de ATC primaria con técnica mínimamente invasiva en el período comprendido de Marzo de 2015 a Febrero de 2016, se analizó a cada paciente con somatometría, calidad de vida (WOMAC), funcionalidad en pacientes con coxartrosis (HHS) y funcionalidad en pacientes con cirugía de cadera (OHS) de manera prequirúrgica y postquirúrgica con seguimiento a un año. Resultados: Se incluyeron 21 pacientes, 17 femeninos y cuatro masculinos que corresponde a 80.95 y 19.05%, respectivamente, edad promedio de 59.95 años (DE = 9.64), con resultados funcionales excelentes a un año, según escalas de HHS y OHS, calidad de vida alta en 100% de los casos según WOMAC, con índice de claudicación bajo de 4.76%. Discusión: El abordaje mínimo invasivo es una técnica quirúrgica reproducible con resultados funcionales excelentes, índice de claudicación baja y alta calidad de vida en pacientes postoperados de ATC primaria durante el primer año de seguimiento.

Abstract: Introduction: The coxarthrosis has incidence of 88 cases per 100,000 people/year and symptomatic prevalence of 16% men and 6% women aged 65-74 years and increases with age. It is a growing public health disease. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become the most successful procedure to increase the quality of life of patients with coxarthrosis. Our objective was to determine the claudication, quality of life and functional results of THA through minimal invasive approach in patients with primary coxarthrosis. Material and methods: Prospective longitudinal study in patients with unilateral primary coxarthrosis postop of THA with minimally invasive approach from March 2015-February 2016, each patient was analyzed with quality of Life instrument (WOMAC), Functional test for coxarthrosis (HHS) and functional test in patients with hip surgery (OHS) with follow-up of one year. Results: We included 21 patients, 17 female and 4 males corresponding to 80.95% and 19.05% respectively, average age of 59.95 years (ED = 9.64), with excellent functional results to one year according to HHS and OHS, quality of life high in 100% of cases according to WOMAC, with claudication rate of 4.76%. Discussion: The minimal invasive approach is a reproducible surgical technique, with excellent functional results, low claudication rate and high quality of life in postoperative patients of primary ATC at only one year of follow-up.

Tratamiento de las fracturas de húmero diafisarias distales con abordaje posterior mínimamente invasivo y placa extraarticular anatómica / Treatment of distal diaphyseal humeral fractures with minimally invasive posterior approach and anatomical extraarticular plate

Introducción Las fracturas de húmero diafisarias corresponden al 3-5% de las fracturas en general. La distribución de las fracturas que comprometen el tercio distal de la diáfisis es variable con incidencias estimadas entre el 10 y el 48%. El objetivo del estudio es evaluar los resultados funcionales y la tasa de consolidación de un grupo de pacientes con fractura diafisaria de húmero del tercio distal con técnica mínimamente invasiva por vía posterior. Materiales y métodos Entre 2013 y 2016 se intervino a 23 pacientes, con una media de edad de 36 años. La valoración funcional se realizó por medio de la Escala de Discapacidades del Hombro, el Codo y la Mano (DASH) abreviada y la medición de los arcos de movilidad de hombro y codo con goniometría; el dolor fue evaluado de acuerdo con la Escala Visual Análoga del Dolor (EVA). Resultados Todas las fracturas consolidaron de forma exitosa, excepto dos casos que presentaron retardo en la consolidación. La lesión del nervio radial previa a la intervención se recuperó de forma progresiva sin requerimiento de transferencias. Los resultados funcionales fueron satisfactorios en un grupo de diez pacientes que completaron más de 1 año de seguimiento. Discusión El abordaje posterior de humero con mínima invasión en el tratamiento de este patrón particular de fracturas parece que muestra una ventaja biológica al permitir una consolidación completa en todos los pacientes. La lesión del nervio radial iatrogénica no parece que aumente en relación con su aislamiento y protección en la porción proximal del tríceps. Nivel de evidencia clínica Nivel IV.

Background Diaphyseal humeral fractures correspond to 3-5% of all fractures. The proportion of these fractures in which the distal third of the diaphysis is involved is variable with estimated incidences between 10-48%. The aim of the study is to evaluate the functional results and rate of fracture consolidation for a group of patients with distal third diaphyseal humeral fractures managed using a minimally invasive technique through a posterior approach. Materials and methods Twenty-two patients (mean age of 36 years) were evaluated between 2013 and 2016. Functional assessment was performed using the DASH abbreviated functional scale. Shoulder and elbow mobility range of motion were measured with goniometry, and pain was measured following the VAS scale. Results All fractures consolidated successfully, with two cases exhibiting delay in consolidation. Radial nerve injury prior to the intervention was progressively recovered without the need for supplementary tendons transfers. Functional results were satisfactory for ten patients that completed more than one year of follow-up. Discussion Minimally invasive technique with posterior approach in the treatment of this particular pattern of humeral fractures seems to show a biological advantage in allowing complete consolidation in all patients. Iatrogenic radial nerve injury does not appear to increase in relation to its isolation and protection in the proximal portion of the triceps. Evidence level IV.