RESUMO
Para avaliar o papel da pregabalina na proteção das náuseas e vômitos induzidos pela quimioterapia, foi realizado um ensaio clínico de fase II, aleatorizado, duplamente cego, controlado por placebo, para investigar se a pregabalina poderia melhorar o controle completo das náuseas e vômitos (desfecho primário). Inscrevemos 82 pacientes virgens de quimioterapia, programados para receber quimioterapia moderadamente e altamente emetogênica. Todos os doentes receberam ondansetron 8mg por via intravenosa, dexametasona 10mg antes da quimioterapia no primeiro dia e, dexametasona 4 mg por via oral, b.d., nos dias dois e três. Os doentes foram distribuídos aleatoriamente para tomar pregabalina 75 mg ou placebo, bd, desde a noite anterior à quimioterapia até ao quinto dia. A resposta completa global não foi estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos (53,7 versus 48,8%, respetivamente, no grupo da pregabalina e no grupo de controlo (P=0,65)). Também não houve diferença estatística significativa durante a fase aguda (primeiras 24 horas) e a fase tardia (24-120h): 80,5% versus 82,9% (P=0,77), 53,7 versus 51,2% (P=0,82), respectivamente. Neste estudo não foi identificada ação da pregabalina na prevenção de náuseas e vômitos induzidos por quimioterapia. Número de registo no Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT04181346.
To evaluate the role of pregabalin in the protection of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, we performed a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate whether pregabalin could improve the complete control of nausea and vomiting (primary end point). We enrolled 82 chemotherapy-naive patients, scheduled to receive moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy. All patients received IV ondansetron 8mg, dexamethasone 10mg before chemotherapy on day one and oral dexamethasone 4mg, b.d., on days two and three. Patients were randomly assigned to take pregabalin 75mg or placebo, bd, from the night before chemotherapy to day five. The overall complete response was not statistically significant between the groups (53.7 versus 48.8%, respectively, in the pregabalin group and the control group (P=0.65)). There was also no significant difference during the acute phase (first 24 hours) and delayed phase (24-120h): 80.5% versus 82.9% (P=0.77), 53.7 versus 51.2% (P=0.82), respectively. There is no role for pregabalin preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Clinicaltrial.gov registration number: NCT04181346.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis (CD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease caused by type 1 biased adaptive immunity for which there is an unmet need for antigen (Ag)-specific immunotherapies. Exposure to skin sensitizers stimulates secretion of the proinflammatory neuropeptides substance P and hemokinin 1, which signal via the neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) to promote the innate and adaptive immune responses of CD. Accordingly, mice lacking the NK1R develop impaired CD. Nonetheless, the role and therapeutic opportunities of targeting the NK1R in CD remain to be elucidated. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop an Ag-specific immunosuppressive approach to treat CD by skin codelivery of hapten and NK1R antagonists integrated in dissolvable microneedle arrays (MNA). METHODS: In vivo mouse models of contact hypersensitivity and ex vivo models of human skin were used to delineate the effects and mechanisms of NK1R signaling and the immunosuppressive effects of the contact sensitizer NK1R antagonist MNA in CD. RESULTS: We demonstrated in mice that CD requires NK1R signaling by substance P and hemokinin 1. Specific deletion of the NK1R in keratinocytes and dendritic cells, but not in mast cells, prevented CD. Skin codelivery of hapten or Ag MNA inhibited neuropeptide-mediated skin inflammation in mouse and human skin, promoted deletion of Ag-specific effector T cells, and increased regulatory T cells, which prevented CD onset and relapses locally and systemically in an Ag-specific manner. CONCLUSIONS: Immunoregulation by engineering localized skin neuroimmune networks can be used to treat cutaneous diseases that like CD are caused by type 1 immunity.