Pemetrexed and platinum with or without pembrolizumab for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining pemetrexed and platinum with or without pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web Of Science databases was conducted to identify studies comparing pemetrexed and platinum with or without pembrolizumab in advanced NSCLC. Raw data were extracted from eligible studies to calculate Hazard Ratios (HR) for Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), as well as rates of adverse events of all grades and those of Grade 3 or higher. RESULTS: Eight studies with 1639 patients occurred advanced NSCLC included. The group receiving pembrolizumab in combination with pemetrexed and platinum showed significant benefits in terms of OS (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.54-0.73; p < 0.00001) and PFS (HR:0.64; 95% CI 0.48-0.85; p = 0.002) compared to the group receiving pemetrexed and platinum alone. However, this benefit was accompanied by a higher incidence of Grade 3 or higher adverse events (OR: 1.55; 95% CI 1.24-1.95; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The combination of pemetrexed and platinum with pembrolizumab is recommended as a first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC due to its significant efficacy benefits. However, the increased risk of Grade 3 or higher adverse events suggests the need for careful consideration and assessment when considering this regimen for second-line or subsequent therapy.

Analysis of genomic alternations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-T790M-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with acquired resistance to osimertinib therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Genomic alterations after resistance to osimertinib therapy in advanced T790M-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are complex and poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to detect these genomic alternations via comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tissue and liquid biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 2020 to June 2021, 31 stage IIIB/IV T790M-mutated NSCLC patients who exhibited progressive disease after osimertinib therapy and provided written informed consent were recruited. Liquid and tissue biopsy samples for NGS testing were collected from 31 and 18 patients, respectively. Eighteen study patients had paired NGS data from tissue and liquid biopsies. RESULTS: With respect to the T790M mutation status, the preservation and loss rates were 33% and 67%, respectively, in both liquid and tissue biopsy samples. Five patients (16.1%) had the C797S mutation (4 liquid samples and 1 tissue sample). Two (6.5%) had MET mutations, 3 (9.7%) had BRAF-V600E mutations, and 1 (3.2%) had a KRAS-G12C mutation. Among the 18 patients who underwent tissue rebiopsies, those with preserved T790M mutation had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) with osimertinib therapy than those with T790M mutation loss (10.8 vs. 5.0 months, P = 0.045). Among all patients, those with T790M mutation loss in liquid biopsy samples had longer PFS after osimertinib therapy (10.8 vs. 7.5 months, P = 0.209) and postprogression survival (17.7 vs. 9.6 months, P = 0.132) than those with preserved T790M mutation based on liquid biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: NGS using either tissue or liquid biopsy samples from advanced T790M-mutated NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to osimertinib therapy can detect various genomic alternations. Future studies focusing on subsequent tailored therapies on the basis of NGS results are warranted.

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in resectable stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) is a new treatment method for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Network meta-analysis assessed efficacy, safety, and optimal treatment. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NICT with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and international conferences. Outcomes were surgical resection rate, pathological complete response(pCR),event-free survival (EFS), and Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). RESULTS: RCTs of 3,387 patients, six treatment combinations, and two modalities were included. Meta-analysis showed that NICT yielded higher pCR and EFS rates than NCT. The toripalimab-chemotherapy combination had the highest surgical resection rate (OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.05-2.73), pCR (OR = 38.84, 95% CI: 11.05-268.19) and EFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28-0.58).This regimen worked well for patients with low programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression or squamous cell pathology. For high PD-L1 expression and patients with NSCLC, neoadjuvant nivolumab with chemotherapy had the most efficacy. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events increased with longer treatment cycles, with perioperative nivolumab combined with chemotherapy showing the worst safety profile (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.00-1.76), while neoadjuvant nivolumab combined with chemotherapy alone had the best safety profile (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.68-1.21). Indirect comparison showed no survival benefit for neoadjuvant-adjuvant immunotherapy (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.65-1.35). In the indirect comparison between the two immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs), although there was no significant difference in EFS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.61-1.08), PD-1 inhibitors may still be the most effective treatment option. CONCLUSIONS: NICT effectively and safely treats resectable NSCLC. The optimal treatment combination is typically toripalimab and chemotherapy. Treatment based on PD-L1 expression and pathological type is recommended.

Identifying patients who benefit more from perioperative immunotherapy combinations for resectable non-small cell lung cancer based on clinical and molecular characteristics: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

PURPOSE: This study aims to identify patient subgroups who benefit more from perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (IO-CT) based on clinical and molecular characteristics in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on perioperative IO-CT were searched. Beneficial differences of IO-CT regimens across different patient subgroups were assessed by pooling trial-specific ratios in event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), pathological complete response (pCR), and major pathological response (MPR). RESULTS: Six studies (n = 3003) involving five IO-CT regimens were included. Compared to CT alone, all IO-CT regimens significantly improved EFS, OS, MPR, and pCR, but increased toxicity. Toripa-chemo showed the best EFS and nivo-chemo showed the best OS. Patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% had more EFS benefits compared to those with PD-L1 < 1% (HR [hazard ratio]: 1.55, 95% CI 1.17-2.04). Squamous NSCLC patients had significantly more pCR and MPR benefits than non-squamous NSCLC patients (pCR: OR [odds ratio] 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.95; MPR: OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.82). Former smokers had significantly higher pCR benefits than non-smokers (OR: 2.18; 95% CI 1.21-3.92). Additionally, OS benefit was significantly higher in patients < 65 years compared to those ≥ 65 years (HR ratio: 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.95). For MPR, males benefited significantly more from IO-CT compared to females (OR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.42). CONCLUSION: Perioperative IO-CT is more effective but more toxic than CT alone in resectable NSCLC. Patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1%, squamous NSCLC, a history of smoking, age < 65 years and male gender may experience greater benefits from perioperative IO-CT.

Prognostic impact of nectin-like molecule-5 (CD155) expression in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: CD155 is a transmembrane protein that inhibits antitumor immune response and represents a predictor of worse prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it remains unexplored its association with clinical characteristics and genomic status of Latin American patients. This study characterizes the CD155 expression and its clinical implications in this population. METHODS: Tissue biopsies from 86 patients with locally-advanced or metastatic NSCLC were assessed for CD155 protein expression, ALK rearrangements and EGFR mutations. Cutoff values for high CD155 expression (CD155high) were determined from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves according to 2-year survival. It was evaluated its association with clinicopathological features, median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS). RESULTS: the cutoff score for CD155high was 155 in the entire cohort and in patients without oncogenic alterations, and it was 110 in patients with oncogenic alterations. Eighty-four patients (97.7%) were CD155 positive, of which fifty-six (65.0%) had CD155high. EGFR L858R mutation related to lower CD155 IHC score than exon 19 deletion. Individuals with CD155high showed a shorter mOS (13.0 vs. 30.8 months; HR: 1.96 [95% CI, 1.15-3.35]; p = 0.014). Patients without oncogenic alterations having a CD155high displayed shorter mPFS (1.6 vs. 6.4 months, HR: 2.09 [95% CI, 1.06-4.20]; p = 0.034) and mOS (2.9 vs. 23.1 months; HR: 1.27 [95% CI, 1.07- 4.42]; p = 0.032). Patients with oncogenic alterations having CD155high only showed a trend to shorter mOS (26.3 vs. 52.0 months; HR: 2.39 [95% CI, 0.98-5.83]; p = 0.058). CONCLUSION: CD155high is a predictor of worse outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC, predominantly among those without oncogenic alterations. CD155 could be a potential biomarker and a molecular target in patients with poor responses to current therapies.

NRI and SIRI are the optimal combinations for prognostic risk stratification in patients with non-small cell lung cancer after EGFR-TKI therapy.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become the standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations. However, NSCLC heterogeneity leads to differences in efficacy; thus, potential biomarkers need to be explored to predict the prognosis of patients. Recently, the prognostic importance of pre-treatment malnutrition and systemic inflammatory response in cancer patients has received increasing attention. METHODS: In this study, clinical information from 363 NSCLC patients receiving EGFR-TKI treatment at our clinical center was used for analysis. RESULTS: High nutritional risk index (NRI) and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) were significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients (P < 0.05). Importantly, NRI and SIRI were the best combination models for predicting clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients and independent OS and PFS predictors. Moreover, a nomogram model was constructed by combining NRI/SIRI, sex, smoking history, EGFR mutation, TNM stage, and surgery treatment to visually and personally predict the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year OS of patients with NSCLC. Notably, risk stratification based on the nomogram model was better than that based on the TNM stage. CONCLUSION: NRI and SIRI were the best combination models for predicting clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients receiving EGFR-TKI treatment, which may be a novel biomarker for supplement risk stratification in NSCLC patients.

Outcomes and Survival for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Wedge Resection or Lobectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Using a Novel Peruvian Registry.

Background: Using a previously unreported Peruvian registry of patients treated for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), this study explored whether wedge resection and lobectomy were equivalent regarding survival and impact on radiologic-pathologic variables. Methods: This observational, analytical, longitudinal study used propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis of a single-center retrospective registry of 2,570 patients with pathologic stage I-II NSCLC who were treated with wedge resection (n=1,845) or lobectomy (n=725) during 2000-2020. After PSM, 650 cases were analyzed (resection, n=325; lobectomy, n=325) through preoperative and clinical variables, including patients with ≥1 lymph node removed. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were created for 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional-recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Results: The principal complication was operative pain persisting >7 days for lobectomy versus wedge resection (58% vs. 23%, p=0.034) and shorter hospital stays for resection than for lobectomy (5.3 days vs. 12.8 days, p=0.009). The 5-year OS (84.3% vs. 81.2%, p=0.09) and DFS (79.1% vs. 74.1%, p=0.07) were similar and statistically insignificant between resections and lobectomies, respectively. LRFS was worse overall following wedge resection than lobectomy (79.8% vs. 91.1%, p<0.02). Nevertheless, in the PSM analysis, both groups experienced similar LRFS when the resection margin was >10 mm (90.9% vs. 87.3%, p<0.048) and ≥4 lymph nodes were removed (82.8% vs. 79.1%, p<0.011). Conclusion: Both techniques led to similar OS and DFS at 5 years; however, successful LRFS required a wedge resection with a surgical margin and adequate lymph node removal to obtain outcomes similar to lobectomy.

The progress of tumor vaccines clinical trials in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a significant global health challenge, with high mortality rates and limited treatment options. Tumor vaccines have emerged as a potential therapeutic approach, aiming to stimulate the immune system to specifically target tumor cells. METHODS: This study screened 283 clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov through July 31, 2023. After excluding data that did not meet the inclusion criteria, a total of 108 trials were assessed. Data on registered number, study title, study status, vaccine types, study results, conditions, interventions, outcome measures, sponsor, collaborators, drug target, phases, enrollment, start date, completion date and locations were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: The number of vaccines clinical trials for NSCLC has continued to increase in recent years, the majority of which were conducted in the United States. Most of the clinical trials were at stages ranging from Phase I to Phase II. Peptide-based vaccines accounted for the largest proportion. Others include tumor cell vaccines, DNA/RNA vaccines, viral vector vaccines, and DC vaccines. Several promising tumor vaccine candidates have shown encouraging results in early-phase clinical trials. However, challenges such as heterogeneity of tumor antigens and immune escape mechanisms still need to be addressed. CONCLUSION: Tumor vaccines represent a promising avenue in the treatment of NSCLC. Ongoing clinical trials are crucial for optimizing vaccine strategies and identifying the most effective combinations. Further research is needed to overcome existing limitations and translate these promising findings into clinical practice, offering new hope for NSCLC patients.

Physical performance and plasma metabolic profile as potential prognostic factors in metastatic lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Low physical performance is associated with higher mortality rate in multiple pathological conditions. Here, we aimed to determine whether body composition and physical performance could be prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Moreover, we performed an exploratory approach to determine whether plasma samples from NSCLC patients could directly affect metabolic and structural phenotypes in primary muscle cells. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 55 metastatic NSCLC patients and seven age-matched control subjects. Assessments included physical performance, body composition, quality of life and overall survival rate. Plasma samples from a sub cohort of 18 patients were collected for exploratory studies in cell culture and metabolomic analysis. RESULTS: We observed a higher survival rate in NSCLC patients with high performance in the timed up-and-go (+320%; p = .007), sit-to-stand (+256%; p = .01) and six-minute walking (+323%; p = .002) tests when compared to NSCLC patients with low physical performance. There was no significant association for similar analysis with body composition measurements (p > .05). Primary human myotubes incubated with plasma from NSCLC patients with low physical performance had impaired oxygen consumption rate (-54.2%; p < .0001) and cell proliferation (-44.9%; p = .007). An unbiased metabolomic analysis revealed a list of specific metabolites differentially expressed in the plasma of NSCLC patients with low physical performance. CONCLUSION: These novel findings indicate that physical performance is a prognostic factor for overall survival in NSCLC patients and provide novel insights into circulating factors that could impair skeletal muscle metabolism.

Importance of Testing for ROS1 Rearrangements in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Targeted Therapy in a Latin American Country.

Purpose: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. However, with the optimization of screening strategies and advances in treatment, mortality has been decreasing in recent years. In this study, we describe non-small cell lung cancer patients diagnosed between 2021 and 2022 at a high-complexity hospital in Latin America, as well as the immunohistochemistry techniques used to screen for ROS1 rearrangements, in the context of the recent approval of crizotinib for the treatment of ROS1 rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer in Colombia. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. Sociodemographic, clinical, and molecular pathology information from non-small cell lung cancer individuals who underwent immunohistochemistry to detect ROS1 rearrangements between 2021 and 2022 at Fundación Valle del Lili (Cali, Colombia) was recorded. The clinical outcomes of confirmed ROS1 rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer patients were reported. Results: One hundred and thirty-six patients with non-small cell lung cancer were included. The median age at diagnosis was 69.8 years (interquartile range 61.9-77.7). At diagnosis, 69.8% (n = 95) were at stage IV. ROS1 immunohistochemistry was performed using the monoclonal D4D6 antibody clone in 54.4% (n = 74) of the cases, while 45.6% (n = 62) were done with the monoclonal SP384 antibody clone. Two patients were confirmed to have ROS1 rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer using next-generation sequencing and received crizotinib. On follow-up at months 5.3 and 7.0, one patient had a partial response, and the other had oligo-progression, respectively. Conclusion: Screening for ROS1 rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer is imperative, as multiple prospective studies have shown improved clinical outcomes with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Given the recent approval of crizotinib in Colombia, public health policies must be oriented toward early detection of driver mutations and prompt treatment. Additionally, future approvals of newly tested tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be anticipated.

Identification and Application of Emerging Biomarkers in Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises approximately 85% of all lung cancer cases, often diagnosed at advanced stages, which diminishes the effective treatment options and survival rates. This systematic review assesses the utility of emerging biomarkers-circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), microRNAs (miRNAs), and the blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB)-enhanced by next-generation sequencing (NGS) to improve the diagnostic accuracy, prognostic evaluation, and treatment strategies in NSCLC. Analyzing data from 37 studies involving 10,332 patients from 2020 to 2024, the review highlights how biomarkers like ctDNA and PD-L1 expression critically inform the selection of personalized therapies, particularly beneficial in the advanced stages of NSCLC. These biomarkers are critical for prognostic assessments and in dynamically adapting treatment plans, where high PD-L1 expression and specific genetic mutations (e.g., ALK fusions, EGFR mutations) significantly guide the use of targeted therapies and immunotherapies. The findings recommend integrating these biomarkers into standardized clinical pathways to maximize their potential in enhancing the treatment precision, ultimately fostering significant advancements in oncology and improving patient outcomes and quality of life. This review substantiates the prognostic and predictive value of these biomarkers and emphasizes the need for ongoing innovation in biomarker research.

EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Retreatment in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Previously Exposed to EGFR-TKI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) retreatment in advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane databases, ASCO, and ESMO websites for studies evaluating EGFR-TKI retreatment in advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients. All analyses were performed using R software (v.4.2.2). We included 19 studies (9 CTs and 10 retrospective cohorts) with a total of 886 patients. In a pooled analysis of all patients during retreatment with TKI, median OS was 11.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.2-13.4 months) and PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI 2.5-3.9 months). ORR was 15% (95% CI 10-21%) and DCR was 61% (95% CI 53-67%). The subanalysis by generation of TKI in the rechallenge period revealed a slightly better ORR for patients on 3rd generation TKI (p = 0.05). Some limitations include the high heterogeneity of some of the analyses and inability to perform certain subanalyses. Our results unequivocally support the benefit of EGFR-TKI rechallenge in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients progressing on TKI treatment after a TKI-free interval. These findings may be especially valuable in areas where access to novel therapeutic drugs and clinical trials is limited.

Survival and pulmonary function in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer after sublobar resection versus lobectomy: An updated meta-analysis.

Traditionally, lobectomy was standard for stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent RCTs suggest sublobar resection's comparable outcomes. Our meta-analysis, incorporating 30 studies (including four RCTs), assessed sublobar resection's efficacy. Employing a random-effects model and I2 statistics for heterogeneity, we found sublobar resection reduced DFS (HR 1.31, p < 0.01) and OS (HR 1.27, p < 0.01) overall. However, RCT subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in DFS (p = 0.28) or OS (p = 0.62). Sublobar resection is a viable option for well-selected patients.

Targeting hyaluronan metabolism-related molecules associated with resistant tumor-initiating cells potentiates chemotherapy efficacy in lung cancer.

The success of chemotherapy regimens in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could be restricted at least in part by cancer stem cells (CSC) niches within the tumor microenvironment (TME). CSC express CD133, CD44, CD47, and SOX2, among other markers and factors. Analysis of public data revealed that high expression of hyaluronan (HA), the main glycosaminoglycan of TME, correlated positively with CSC phenotype and decreased disease-free interval in NSCLC patients. We aimed to cross-validate these findings on human and murine lung cancer cells and observed that CD133 + CSC differentially expressed higher levels of HA, HAS3, ABCC5, SOX2, and CD47 (p < 0.01). We modulated HA expression with 4-methylumbelliferone (4Mu) and detected an increase in sensitivity to paclitaxel (Pa). We evaluated the effect of 4Mu + chemotherapy on survival, HA metabolism, and CSC profile. The combination of 4Mu with Pa reduced the clonogenic and tumor-forming ability of CSC. Pa-induced HAS3, ABCC5, SOX2, and CD47 expression was mitigated by 4Mu. Pa + 4Mu combination significantly reduced in vivo tumor growth, enhancing animal survival and restoring the CSC profile in the TME to basal levels. Our results suggest that HA is involved in lung CSC phenotype and chemosensitivity, and its modulation by 4Mu improves treatment efficacy to inhibit tumor progression.

Advanced non-squamous NSCLC with no actionable oncogenic driver in Spain: a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of data from the Thoracic Tumor Registry.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the vast majority of all diagnosed lung cancers. According to their histology, most NSCLCs are considered non-squamous cell carcinoma (NSCC), and up to 85% of the latter may lack either one of the two main actionable oncogenic drivers (i.e., EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements). OBJECTIVE: Our analysis aimed to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of Spanish patients suffering from NSCC with no actionable oncogenic driver in daily clinical practice. DESIGN: A retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive analysis. METHODS: We analyzed the records of all Spanish patients with advanced NSCC diagnosed between January 2011 and January 2020 and included in the Spanish Thoracic Tumor Registry database. We evaluated the presence of metastasis and molecular profiling at the time of diagnosis and treatments received. We also assessed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) according to first-line treatment. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred ninety-seven Spanish patients with NSCC were included. They were mainly men (73.2%), smokers (current [44.4%] and former [44.4%]) and presented adenocarcinoma histology (97.6%). Most patients had at least one comorbidity (80.4%) and one metastatic site (96.8%), and a non-negligible number of those tested were PD-L1 positive (35.2%). Notably, the presence of liver metastasis indicated a shorter median OS and PFS than metastasis in other locations (p < 0.001). Chemotherapy was more often prescribed than immunotherapy as first-, second-, and third-line treatment in that period. In first-line, the OS rates were similar in patients receiving either regimen, but PFS rates significantly better in patients treated with immunotherapy (p = 0.026). Also, a high number of patients did not reach second- and third-line treatment, suggesting the failure of current early diagnostic measures and therapies. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of the most lethal tumor in Spain could highlight the strengths and the weaknesses of its clinical management and set the ground for further advances and research.

Complete response to capmatinib in a patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma harboring CD47-MET fusion: a case report.

Comprehensive genomic profiling is highly recommended for treatment decision in nonsquamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, rare genomic alterations are still being unveiled, with scarce data to guide therapy. Herein, we describe the treatment journey of a 56-year-old, never-smoker Caucasian woman with a metastatic NSCLC harboring a CD47-MET fusion, initially classified as a variant of unknown significance. She had undergone 3 lines of therapy over the course of 3 years, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and anti-angiogenic therapy. After reanalysis of her next-generation sequencing data in our service, the fusion was reclassified as likely oncogenic. The patient was started with fourth-line capmatinib, with a good tolerance so far and a complete metabolic response in the active sites of disease, currently ongoing for 18 months. In conclusion, we highlight the sensitivity of a novel MET fusion to capmatinib and emphasize the need for comprehensive panels in NSCLC and molecular tumor board discussions with specialized centers when rare findings arise.

Efficacy and safety of metronomic oral vinorelbine and its combination therapy as second- and later-line regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of metronomic oral vinorelbine and its combination therapy as second- and later-line regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: NSCLC patients undergoing metronomic oral vinorelbine as second- and later-line regimens in Fujian Cancer Hospital from October 2018 to October 2022 were enrolled, and patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. The efficacy and safety of metronomic oral vinorelbine monotherapy and its combination therapy regimens were compared. RESULTS: Of 57 study subjects, 63.2% received third- and later-line therapy, with median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 4 months, overall response rate (ORR) of 10.5%, and disease control rate (DCR) of 80.7%. The incidence of therapy-related adverse events was 42.1%, and there was only one case presenting grades 3 and 4 adverse events (1.8%). Among driver gene-negative participants, vinorelbine combination therapy regimens achieved longer mPFS (4.6 vs. 1.2 months, hazards ratio = 0.11, P < 0.0001) and comparable toxicity in relative to metronomic oral vinorelbine, and metronomic oral vinorelbine combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors showed the highest response, with mPFS of 5.6 months (95% CI 4.8 to 6.4 months), ORR of 25%, and DCR of 81.3%. Among participants with gradual resistance to osimertinib, continuing osimertinib in combination with metronomic oral vinorelbine achieved mPFS of 6.3 months (95% CI 0.1 to 12.5 months) and DCR of 86.7%. CONCLUSION: Metronomic oral vinorelbine and its combination therapy regimens are favorable options as second- and later-line therapy for advanced NSCLC patients, with acceptable efficacy and tolerable toxicity. Vinorelbine combination therapy regimens show higher efficacy and comparable toxicity in relative to metronomic oral vinorelbine, and metronomic oral vinorelbine may have a synergistic effect with immunotherapy and EGFR-TKI targeted therapy.

The clinical features and prognostic implications of the co-mutated TP53 gene in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: TP53 is a frequently mutated oncogene within non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical and prognostic significance of co-mutations in TP53 in patients with advanced NSCLC has not been fully elucidated. METHODS: A total of 174 patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in this study. All patients were subjected to sequencing analysis of tumor-related genes and information such as PD-L1 expression, TMB, and co-mutation changes were collected. Patients were categorized into TP53 mutant and TP53 wild-type groups according to their TP53 mutation status and then statistically analyzed. RESULTS: TP53 mutations were the most common among all patients, accounting for 56.32%, followed by epidermal growth factor receptor mutations at 48.27%. The most common mutation sites in the TP53 mutation group were exons 5-8.TP53 mutations were significantly associated with PD-L1 and TMB levels. Univariate Cox analysis showed that gender and EGFR mutation affected the prognosis of TP53-mutated NSCLC patients, and multivariate Cox regression analysis identified EGFR mutation as an independent risk factor. The OS of NSCLC patients in the TP53 mutation group was significantly shorter than that of the TP53wt group. Survival curves in the TP53/EGFR combined mutation group showed that patients with combined EGFR mutation had a lower survival rate. DISCUSSION: TP53 mutations are associated with different clinical indicators and have important implications in clinical treatment. TP53 is a poor prognostic factor for NSCLC patients, and TP53/EGFR co-mutation will affect the survival time of patients. TP53/EGFR co-mutation may be a new prognostic marker for NSCLC.

Safety and efficacy of restarting immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients following immune-related adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of restarting immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after experiencing immune-related adverse events (irAEs). METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies investigating the safety and efficacy of restarting ICIs in NSCLC patients after irAEs. Outcome measures, including objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after ICI restarting, were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using the R meta-package. RESULTS: Four studies involving a total of 326 subjects were included, comprising 137 patients who restarted ICI treatment after irAEs and 189 patients who did not restart ICI treatment. The results revealed that ICI restarting was associated with an increased ORR (OR = 2.36, 95% CI 1.49-3.84), prolonged PFS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.86), and prolonged OS (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.99) compared to non-restarting. The incidence of irAEs after ICI restarting was 45% (95% CI 0.27-0.63). CONCLUSION: Restarting ICI treatment after discontinuation due to previous irAEs appears to be a reasonable option for NSCLC patients. However, a comprehensive assessment of the potential benefits and risks to individual patients is crucial, and close monitoring of irAEs is warranted.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of domestically produced tislelizumab, camrelizumab, and imported pembrolizumab in the treatment of advanced NSCLC: a real-world retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Since the imported PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab was listed in China in 2018, China has opened up the era of immunotherapy for malignant tumors, with several domestically produced PD-1 inhibitors coming onto the market one after another. To find out whether there are differences in the efficacy and safety of domestic and imported PD-1 inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, we conducted this retrospective study in two tertiary hospitals in China. METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC treated with tislelizumab or camrelizumab or pembrolizumab who met the inclusion criteria were screened through the electronic medical record system. A total of 259 patients were screened, but due to the unbalanced baseline, we performed propensity score matching and finally included 149 patients in three groups: pembrolizumab (n = 38), tislelizumab (n = 38), and camrelizumab (n = 73), which had very balanced baseline characteristics in each group after propensity score matching treatment. RESULTS: The results showed that the median progression-free period was 11.3 m vs 10.1 m vs 8.9 m; p = 0.754; and the objective response rate was 63.2% vs 50% vs 57.5%; P = 0.510 for pembrolizumab, tislelizumab, and carrelizumab, respectively. There was no significant difference in median PFS between PD-L1 expression subgroups. In terms of safety, only skin toxicity of any grade of carrelizumab was higher than that of the other two groups (p = 0.034), and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse reactions was not statistically significant among the three groups. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, the efficacy and safety of the domestically produced tislelizumab, camrelizumab, and the imported pembrolizumab were comparable.