Ospemifene and vulvovaginal atrophy: an update of the clinical profile for post-menopausal women.

INTRODUCTION: The demand for effective and safe treatments of genitourinary syndrome (GSM) in post-menopausal women (PMW) is growing. Published data on the efficacy and safety of ospemifene (OSP) prompt an updated literature review to enlighten possible improvements in the GSM treatment. AREA COVERED: We searched articles published in English from 2010 to 2023 through Medline (PubMed) and Embase databases with Boolean terms: OSP, PMW, GSM, endometrium, breast cancer, cardiometabolic syndrome, bone metabolism, adherence to treatment, and patient satisfaction. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational and cross-sectional studies and completed the search manually. EXPERT OPINION: Of the 157 retrieved records, 25 primary studies met the inclusion criteria (15 regarding efficacy and safety, two for additional effects, and four for adherence and satisfaction with the OSP treatment). Seven RCTs involved nearly 5,000 patients, 10 out of 18 prospective observational studies 563, and six retrospective analyses 356,439. Evidence of OSP treatment in PMW with GSM relies on RCTs and remarkable real-world data. The 25 primary studies showcased the high clinical response to symptoms, the favorable safety profile of OSP with very few adverse events, a neutral impact on the endometrium, breast, bone, and thrombosis, and the possible improvement of cardiovascular risk factors.

Ospemifene for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: Patient Selection.

Vulvar vaginal atrophy is a common condition affecting postmenopausal women, significantly impacting their quality of life. Fortunately, various treatment options are available, ranging from hormonal to non-hormonal therapies. Ospemifene has emerged as a promising non-hormonal alternative for managing vulvar vaginal atrophy. Its targeted approach, unique mechanism of action, favorable safety profile particularly for breast tissue, and efficacy make it a valuable option for women seeking relief from symptoms such as vaginal pain, dryness and dyspareunia and cannot receive estrogen supplementations. This is particularly the case for breast cancer survivors or women with a significant family history of estrogen-dependent cancers. Hence, tailored treatment plans, considering individual preferences and health circumstances, are essential in optimizing outcomes and improving the overall well-being of affected individuals.

Vulvovaginal atrophy in women with and without a history of breast cancer: Baseline data from the PatiEnt satisfactiON studY (PEONY) in Italy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess clinical characteristics of postmenopausal women with moderate/severe vulvovaginal atrophy, as well as its impact on sexual function, well-being, and quality of life, and to provide an overview of most used treatments. STUDY DESIGN: Ongoing longitudinal, observational study conducted in 17 Italian gynecology centers, involving women already treated or initiating a local vaginal estrogen therapy or ospemifene. We report baseline data for women with and without a history of breast cancer. Participants filled in self-reported questionnaires at study entry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Severity of vulvovaginal atrophy; ongoing treatments; patient-reported outcomes, including severity of symptoms, Day-to-Day Impact of Vaginal Aging (DIVA), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R), and SF-12® Health Survey. RESULTS: Overall, 334 women (20.4 % with a history of breast cancer) started or continued local therapy (61.1 %) or ospemifene (38.8 %) at study entry. Vulvovaginal atrophy was severe in 28.6 %, and was responsible for severe symptoms, particularly vulvar dryness with burning or irritation and pain during sexual intercourse. Both sexual dysfunction (FSFI≤26) (81.5 %) and sexual distress (FSDS-R ≥ 11) (74.4 %) were common. A reduction in the SF-12 mental component score was documented. Women with breast cancer more often had severe vulvovaginal atrophy (41.2 %), had more severe symptoms, and the impact of vaginal symptoms on emotional well-being, sexual functioning and self-concept/body image was greater. The majority of them (83.8 %) received ospemifene as a treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate/severe vulvovaginal atrophy is a common, often neglected condition with an impact on QoL and sexuality, particularly in women with a history of breast cancer. It is important to alleviate the burden associated with the disease.

Vulvovaginal atrophy in the CRETA study: the healthcare professionals' perception.

OBJECTIVES: The objective is to assess the perception of gynecologists regarding patients' adherence to vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) treatments, to evaluate the gynecologists' opinions on what their patients think about treatment adherence, and to compare the gynecologists' opinions with the patients' own perceptions within the CRETA study. METHODS: Spanish gynecologists who participated in the CRETA study were asked to fill out an online 41-item questionnaire to evaluate their views on VVA management. RESULTS: From 29 centers across Spain, 44 gynecologists completed the survey. Their mean age was 47.2 years old, two-thirds of them were women, and the average professional experience was over 20 years. According to the gynecologists, the therapy most frequently used by VVA-diagnosed women was vaginal moisturizers (45.5%), followed by local estrogen therapy (36.4%) and ospemifene (18.2%). Nevertheless, ospemifene was viewed as the therapeutic option with the most efficacy, easiest route of administration, shorter time to symptom improvement, lower percentage of dropouts, and higher treatment adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Spanish gynecologists are in general agreement with their patients regarding VVA treatment preferences and the main issues for adherence and effectiveness. However, there is an opportunity for doctor-patient communication improvement. Among the three therapeutic options evaluated, ospemifene is regarded as offering some competitive advantages.

A real-world disproportionality analysis of ospemifene: data mining of the public version of FDA adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND: Ospemifene has been authorized for the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA). This study wasto evaluate adverse events (AEs) associated with ospemifene by data mining the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: The signals of AEs linked to ospemifene were measured using disproportionality analyses, such as the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms. RESULTS: There were 2283 events of ospemifene being the 'primary suspected (PS)' AE out of the 12,692,824 reports from the FAERS database. Ospemifene-induced AEs hit 25 organ systems. There were 726 severely disproportional preferred terms (PTs) that complied with the four algorithms. The investigation turned up a number of anticipated adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and significant unanticipated ADRs linked to eye and renal problems were found, indicating potential side effects not yet included in the prescription instructions. CONCLUSION: We detected novel AEs signals for ospemifene, and the results of our investigation were compatible with clinical observations. This suggests that further prospective clinical trials are required to confirm these findings and demonstrate their link. Our findings might be useful supporting data for ospemifene safety research in the future.

Posttreatment with Ospemifene Attenuates Hypoxia- and Ischemia-Induced Apoptosis in Primary Neuronal Cells via Selective Modulation of Estrogen Receptors.

Stroke and perinatal asphyxia have detrimental effects on neuronal cells, causing millions of deaths worldwide each year. Since currently available therapies are insufficient, there is an urgent need for novel neuroprotective strategies to address the effects of cerebrovascular accidents. One such recent approach is based on the neuroprotective properties of estrogen receptors (ERs). However, activation of ERs by estrogens may contribute to the development of endometriosis or hormone-dependent cancers. Therefore, in this study, we utilized ospemifene, a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) already used in dyspareunia treatment. Here, we demonstrated that posttreatment with ospemifene in primary neocortical cell cultures subjected to 18 h of hypoxia and/or ischemia followed by 6 h of reoxygenation has robust neuroprotective potential. Ospemifene partially reverses hypoxia- and ischemia-induced changes in LDH release, the degree of neurodegeneration, and metabolic activity. The mechanism of the neuroprotective actions of ospemifene involves the inhibition of apoptosis since the compound decreases caspase-3 overactivity during hypoxia and enhances mitochondrial membrane potential during ischemia. Moreover, in both models, ospemifene decreased the levels of the proapoptotic proteins BAX, FAS, FASL, and GSK3ß while increasing the level of the antiapoptotic protein BCL2. Silencing of specific ERs showed that the neuroprotective actions of ospemifene are mediated mainly via ESR1 (during hypoxia and ischemia) and GPER1 (during hypoxia), which is supported by ospemifene-evoked increases in ESR1 protein levels in hypoxic and ischemic neurons. The results identify ospemifene as a promising neuroprotectant, which in the future may be used to treat injuries due to brain hypoxia/ischemia.

Non-hormonal treatments for managing vulvovaginal atrophy/genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

The demand for non-hormonal therapies for vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is increasing due to an increasing number of patients surviving long term post cancer diagnosis, as well as increased public knowledge of the symptoms of menopause and availability of non-hormonal therapies. Treatment options are wide-ranging and encompass different formulations and methods of application. This review summarizes the key characteristics of the main forms of these therapies, as well as considering the current evidence for each of them and where future clinical studies should be directed. Care for VVA may be in primary care, or under gynecology or oncology. Further research requirements include the need for long-term data as well larger randomized controlled trials into alternatives where vaginal estrogen cannot be used as first-line treatment. Widespread education of health-care providers and patients on VVA and the impact on quality of life is urgently needed, as well as increased use of non-hormonal methods in routine clinical practice.

Satisfaction and medication adherence in women with vulvovaginal atrophy: the CRETA.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the self-reported satisfaction of Spanish postmenopausal women currently treated for vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) symptoms. METHODS: The CRETA (CRoss sectional European sTudy on Adherence) is a multicenter cross-sectional study conducted in 29 public and private hospitals in Spain, which enrolled postmenopausal women receiving treatment with ospemifene, local hormone therapy (HT) or vaginal moisturizers for VVA. After the prior informed consent of the patients, sociodemographic and treatment perception data were collected using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: Among 752 women who completed the survey, the satisfaction score was significantly higher for the group treated with ospemifene (mean 8.3 ± 1.4) compared with the local HT group (7.2 ± 1.7) and the vaginal moisturizer group (6.5 ± 2.1) according to a 10-point Likert scale (p < 0.0001). Compared to vaginal moisturizers and local HT, participants treated with ospemifene reported the highest adherence (96.7% vs. 70.2% and 78.6%, respectively) and the lowest number of missed doses in the last month (0.6 ± 1.3 standard deviation [SD] vs. 3.5 ± 4.3 SD and 2.0 ± 2.8 SD, respectively) (p < 0.0001). Ospemifene was significantly perceived as easy to use (83.9% vs. 44.9% and 58.6%, respectively; p < 0.0001), efficacious in reducing the time to relieve symptoms (17.1% vs. 7.0% and 6.7%, p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0006, respectively) and convenient for sexual life (53.1% vs. 25.6% and 42.3%, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0234, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among postmenopausal women with VVA, treatment with ospemifene has the most positive perceptions and the highest overall satisfaction level and could be an optimal therapeutic approach, maximizing patient adherence.

Expert opinion on the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy with ospemifene based on new evidence.

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is an underdiagnosed and undertreated chronic condition resulting in physiological and histological changes in the genitourinary tract of postmenopausal women. Treatment of moderate to severe VVA includes local estrogens, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and oral ospemifene, a third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM). Due to venous thromboembolism (VTE) safety concerns classically associated with the SERM class, and as part of its original marketing authorization approval (MAA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA) requested the performance of a 5-year post-authorization safety study (PASS) to study the incidence rate of VTE among women receiving ospemifene. The results have led to important regulatory changes to ospemifene's labeling, extending its indication and eliminating concerted risk management measures. A panel of experts discussed and reached consensus on the impact of these regulatory changes on clinical practice, reflecting on the reassurance of ospemifene's benefit-risk balance and recommending its positioning as a first-line pharmacological treatment option for moderate to severe VVA together with local therapies. In a scenario where different treatments present similar efficacy and safety profiles, a shared decision between clinician and patient, according to her needs and preferences over time, is fundamental to improve adherence and persistence with sequential treatment, contributing to the achievement of health outcomes.

Impact of vulvovaginal atrophy therapies on postmenopausal women's quality of life in the CRETA study measured by the Cervantes scale.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the correlation of different vulvovaginal atrophy therapeutic options with the quality of life of postmenopausal women. STUDY DESIGN: The CRETA study is a descriptive, observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study designed to measure, besides treatment satisfaction and adherence, the quality of life of postmenopausal women diagnosed with vulvovaginal atrophy in 29 hospitals and centers across Spain. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study enrolled postmenopausal women currently receiving treatment with vaginal moisturizers, local estrogen therapy or ospemifene. Clinical features and treatment perceptions were collected by self-report questionnaire and quality of life was evaluated using the Cervantes scale. RESULTS: Among the 752 women included, the ospemifene cohort showed a statistically significant lower global score (44.9 ± 21.7) on the Cervantes scale (and therefore, a better quality of life) than the cohorts treated with moisturizers (52.5 ± 21.6, p = 0.003) or local estrogen therapy (49.2 ± 23.8, p = 0.0473). In the analysis by domains, ospemifene-treated women showed statistically significant better scores in menopause & health and psychological status than moisturizers-treated women (p < 0.05). In the domains of sexuality and couple relations, the score for the quality of life of the ospemifene cohort was statistically significantly better than the scores in either of the cohorts treated with moisturizers (p < 0.001) or local estrogen therapy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal women diagnosed with vulvovaginal atrophy and treated with ospemifene have better quality of life than women treated with vaginal moisturizers or local estrogen therapy. The improvement observed with ospemifene is more remarkable in those aspects related to sex life and couple relations. CLINCIALTRIALS. GOV NUMBER: NCT04607707.

Sequential treatment in vulvovaginal atrophy.

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a chronic and progressive disease that affects sexuality and quality of life. VVA is preventable and treatable, but requires long-term and often sequential treatment. Sequential treatment consists of designing a strategy that uses one or more medications for a long enough time to achieve the desired benefits with minimal risk and maximum adherence. Currently available therapeutic options consist of topical over-the-counter products (including non-hormonal lubricants and moisturizers applied to the vagina), systemic hormone therapy and estrogens, and prescribed vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). In addition, we have a selective estrogen receptor modulator, ospemifene, and new energy-based treatments (laser and radiofrequency). There are clear differences between the treatments both in the mechanism of action and in the efficacy. Compliance is very low, and patients complain about the use of the vaginal route, often due to its low efficacy, or express fear of the long-term use of estrogens or the price of the treatments. We believe that, as a first option, and for physiological, preventive and efficacy reasons, we should consider the prescription of treatments that work on estrogen receptors. As a second option, there are vaginal moisturizers, which are effective on symptoms but do not prevent or improve conditions. Finally, techniques using heat, which although each time represent a clearer alternative, but on the other hand are the cost and the long-term safety data, give us a third option. Of course, we consider that vulvar moisturizers and lubricants can be used at any time.

Effects of ospemifene on overactive bladder in postmenopausal women with vulvovaginal atrophy.

OBJECTIVE: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a complex and multifactorial syndrome associated with urinary frequency, urgency and incontinence. The menopause-associated hormonal changes play a role in the development of this condition. Vaginal estrogens are effective in improving OAB in postmenopausal women (PMW) with vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA). Ospemifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator licensed for the treatment of VVA. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ospemifene on OAB symptoms in PMW with VVA. METHODS: Forty PMW suffering from OAB and VVA received oral ospemifene (60 mg/day) for 12 weeks. All patients were assessed with a urodynamic study, a 3-day bladder diary and validated questionnaires (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form [ICIQ-UI SF] and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Overactive Bladder [ICIQ-OAB]) at enrollment and at the end of the study. RESULTS: Cytometric capacity, bladder compliance and verbal sensory threshold responses during bladder filling were improved after treatment. The voiding diary showed a significant reduction of daily voids, urge urinary incontinence episodes and nocturnal events. The median overall scores of the ICIQ-UI and ICIQ-OAB were also significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggest that treatment with ospemifene in PMW suffering from OAB is associated with a reduction of OAB symptoms due to a decreased bladder sensitivity and with an improvement in quality of life.

New developments in the management of vulvovaginal atrophy: a comprehensive overview.

INTRODUCTION: Proper recognition and individualized therapy of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is paramount. AREAS COVERED: Assessment of VVA should be performed using several questionnaires in combination with wet mount microscopy to determine Vaginal Cell Maturation Index (VCMI) and infections. PubMed searches were carried out between 1 march 2022 and 15 October 2022.Low dose vaginal estriol seems safe, efficient, and could be used in patients with contraindications for steroid hormones such as women with a history of breast cancer, and should therefore be considered as first choice hormonal treatment, when non-hormonal treatments fail. New estrogens, androgens, and several Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) are being developed and tested. Intravaginal Hyaluronic Acid (HA) or Vit D can help women who can't or don't want to use hormones. EXPERT OPINION: Proper treatment is not possible without a correct and full diagnosis, including microscopy of the vaginal fluid. Low dose vaginal estrogen treatment, especially with estriol, is very efficient and is preferred in most women with VVA. Oral ospemifene and vaginal dihydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) are now considered efficient and safe alternative therapies for VVA. More safety data are waited for several SERMs and for a newly introduced estrogen: estetrol (E4), although so far no major side effects were seen from these drugs. Indications for laser treatments are questionable.

Current challenges in the pharmacological management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

INTRODUCTION: Genitourinary syndrome of menopause is caused by climacteric estrogens drop and leads to bothersome and progressive genital and urinary symptoms. Considering the high frequency in the population and the impact on quality of life, it is crucial to find a safe and effective treatment. Pharmacological therapies aim to modulate the hormonal system and reverse tissue changes due to hypoestrogenism and consequently the symptoms. AREAS COVERED: We analyzed the scientific evidence concerning the main pharmacological treatments, which include systemic and topical estrogens, prasterone and ospemifene. This literature review focused on recent safety and efficacy findings in an attempt to identify the best treatment choice for each individual patient. EXPERT OPINION: There are encouraging data regarding the efficacy of all currently available pharmacological options and concerning their short and long-term safety. There are still doubts regarding best treatment choice for oncological high-risk population, in particular for breast cancer survivors, and some issues relative to patients' poor compliance and treatment adherence. For these reasons further studies need to be conducted with a patient-tailored focus.

Pharmacotherapy for female sexual dysfunctions (FSDs): what is on the market and where is this field heading?

INTRODUCTION: Female sexual dysfunctions (FSDs) are common in women of any age and have a huge impact on quality of life and relationships. They have a multifaceted etiology limiting the development of pharmacotherapies with a high rate of effectiveness. Safety issues are also a concern. AREAS COVERED: The authors report the most recent advances in pharmacotherapy for premenopausal and postmenopausal women with a main focus on hypoactive sexual desire disorders (HSDD) and associated sexual symptoms. Good levels of evidence have emerged for psychoactive agents, such as flibanserin and bremelanotide, as well as hormonal compounds (transdermal testosterone). The authors also report briefly on intravaginal DHEA (prasterone), local estrogen therapy (LET), and ospemifene to manage effectively vulvovaginal atrophy/genitourinary syndrome of menopause (VVA/GSM). In addition, they discuss promising therapeutic options highlighting the main reasons that hamper the availability of new labeled products. Finally, they include the importance of the multimodal approach to address FSDs. EXPERT OPINION: Approved pharmacotherapies for FSD are limited. Validated multidimensional instruments and adequate objective measures of physical and mental responses to sexual external and internal incentives are mandatory to identify women suitable to chronic or on-demand treatments and to assess their pattern of response in research and practice.

Effect of Ospemifene on Densitometric and Plasma Bone Metabolism Biomarkers in Postmenopausal Women Reporting Vulvar and Vaginal Atrophy (VVA).

Menopausal hormone deficiency can exert multiple effects on various organs. Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is among the most widespread and disabling post-menopausal disorder. Hormonal changes can also result in a markedly increased rate of bone mineral density (BMD) loss. Ospemifene (OSP) is an SERM indicated to treat vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) in postmenopausal women. This study evaluates the long-term effects of ospemifene therapy on bone metabolism and bone mineral parameters in postmenopausal women reporting VVA/GSM. METHODS: Women reporting VVA symptoms were included. Bone health profile was investigated in 61 subjects treated with OSP (OSPG) (60 mg/day) and compared with a control group (CG) (n = 67) over 12 months. RESULTS: In the CG, BMD and T-score statistically decreased at the femoral neck (FN), total femur (TF), and lumbar spine (L1-L4). In the OSPG, BMD decreased significantly at FN but tended to remain stable at TF and L1-L4. No changes were observed in bone mineral markers after one year in either group, except BAP, which decreased in OSPG. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term OSP treatment improves bone mineral markers at TF and LS and slows bone loss at FN compared to the control group. Overall, OSP exerts a protective effect on bone loss in healthy menopausal women with VVA.

Risk of venous thromboembolism among women receiving ospemifene: a comparative observational study.

Introduction: The primary aim of this study was to compare the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among women initiating ospemifene vs other selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) therapies for estrogen-deficiency conditions or breast cancer prevention, and vs women with untreated vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA). The secondary objective examined numerous additional safety outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using the IBM Watson MarketScan claims database. Women receiving ospemifene, another SERM, or with a new diagnosis of VVA with no treatment from 1 May 2013 to 2 October 2018 were followed through the claims for incident adverse outcomes. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of VTE following cohort entry; secondary outcomes included cerebrovascular events and other adverse events potentially associated with SERM use. Cox models compared the risk of VTE between ospemifene and comparators, using a variety of approaches to control for confounding. Results: The incidence of VTE during the first continuous treatment episode was 3.39 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.55-6.43) events per 1,000 person-years (PY) for ospemifene (N = 8977), 11.30 (95% CI: 8.81-14.28) events per 1,000 PY for comparator SERM (N = 12,621), and 10.92 (95% CI: 10.49-11.37) events per 1,000 PY for untreated VVA (N = 242,488). Cox models indicated no increase in risk of VTE for ospemifene vs other SERMs (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.19-0.82), and vs untreated VVA (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24-0.91). Conclusion: This real-world safety analysis found no increase in risk of VTE or other adverse events with use of ospemifene in postmenopausal women. Plain Language Summary: Introduction: This study assessed the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among women treated with ospemifene or another selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) therapy and women with untreated vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA). Numerous additional safety outcomes were examined.Methods: This study was conducted in the IBM Watson MarketScan claims database. Women receiving ospemifene, another SERM, or with a new diagnosis of VVA with no treatment from 1 May 2013 to 2 October 2018 were followed through the claims for adverse outcomes, including VTE, cerebrovascular events (such as stroke), and other outcomes that might occur with use of a SERM. The analyses compared the risk of VTE between ospemifene and the other two groups, using methods that accounted for differences in patient characteristics between the groups. Because few women over 72 years old used ospemifene, the main analyses examined women aged 54-72 years.Results: The analyses included 8,977 ospemifene users, 12,621 other SERM users, and 242,488 women with untreated VVA. Among women aged 54-72 years, only 9 experienced a VTE during ospemifene treatment, while 55 other SERM users and 1,788 women with untreated VVA had a VTE. The analyses that accounted for differences between the groups confirmed that the risk of VTE was no higher in ospemifene users than in either comparison group.Conclusion: This real-world safety analysis found no increase in risk of VTE or other adverse events with use of ospemifene in postmenopausal women.

Long-term use of ospemifene in clinical practice for vulvo-vaginal atrophy: end results at 12 months of follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the improvement in vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) of postmenopausal women treated with oral ospemifene 60 mg/day under conditions of routine clinical practice after 12 months of follow-up. METHODS: The AYSEX study is a Spanish observational, prospective, and unicentric study in which five gynecologists recruited postmenopausal women with VVA in routine clinical practice treated with oral ospemifene 60 mg/day as an appropriate therapeutic option. Vaginal health, the most bothersome symptoms, sexual health, endometrial safety, bone resorption markers, bone densitometry, mammography, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life were assessed at baseline and after 12 months using appropriate scales. RESULTS: A total of 100 postmenopausal women cytologically and clinically diagnosed with VVA were included in the study. After 3 months of treatment with ospemifene, a significant improvement was observed in all domains of Vaginal Health Index. This improvement was maintained at month 12 and only one patient remained with vaginal atrophy. In addition, a significant improvement was observed in the most bothersome symptoms, sexual function, and quality of life. There was no significant change in endometrial thickness, mammography, and bone health during the 12 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study in routine clinical practice conditions confirms the results previously reported by randomized controlled trials, including a significant improvement in VVA, sexual function, quality of life, endometrial safety, and satisfaction with the treatment.

Management of Hypertension with Female Sexual Dysfunction.

Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in hypertension has been less studied than male sexual dysfunction, and antihypertensive agents' impact on female sexual function is not defined. In this review, randomized double-blind clinical trials and cross-sectional studies related to female sexual function in hypertension were analyzed from 1991 to 2021. FSD appeared to be higher in hypertensive women than in normotensive women. Beta-blockers are the only antihypertensive agents with relatively strong evidence of damaging the female sexual function. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are relatively beneficial to female sexual function. To treat FSD in the presence of hypertension, controlling blood pressure is key, and the administration of angiotensin receptor blockers is preferred. In addition to controlling blood pressure, for premenopausal women, flibanserin and bremelanotide can be tried, while ospemifene and hormone supplements are preferred for postmenopausal women.