Intracardiac Shunt Reversal and Early Right Ventricular Failure after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a common complication that occurs after a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is implanted. We report an interesting case of severe and refractory hypoxia during the early postoperative period after HeartMate3 (HM3) (Abbott Laboratories, Lake Forest, IL) implantation resulting in the unmasking of a right-to-left intracardiac shunt through a patent foramen ovale (PFO), triggered by early RVF. Importantly, the patient had a small left-to-right shunt after receiving a left-sided Impella 5.5 micro-axial pump (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) pre-LVAD implantation. We observed improved hypoxia but worsening RVF after percutaneous PFO closure, necessitating right-sided mechanical circulatory support. We outline potential reasons for the significant PFO-related shunting seen after HM3 implantation, but not after Impella 5.5 placement. Uncertainty exists regarding the approach to a PFO in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. We propose an approach based on existing literature.

Updates on Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) Closure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been previously linked to left circulation thromboembolism and stroke. This review article aims to discuss the latest evidence, updated societal guidelines, diagnostic algorithms and novel therapeutic devices for PFO closure. RECENT FINDINGS: PFO closure for cryptogenic stroke and systemic embolization is supported by a large body of evidence and has a strong societal recommendation. Limited data are available for platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome, although closure appears to be beneficial. Current data do not support routine closure for migraines and decompression Illness. Development of heart-brain teams can improve identification of patients most likely to benefit from closure, utilizing a combination of imaging test and risk score algorithms. Multiple novel devices aiming at reducing complications and improving the long-term impact of current available devices are being evaluated. PFO closure has significantly progressed over the last years, with new data supporting its superiority in reducing risk of recurrent embolic stroke in patients with PFO-related stroke. Additional clinical data are required to provide further refinements on patient selection and guidance on treatment of specific subgroups.

Construction and validation of a nomogram for predicting remission of migraine patients with patent foramen ovale after closure.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to construct and validate a nomogram model that predicts the remission of migraine attacks by screening factors that affect the prognosis of migraine patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) after closure. METHOD: Retrospective analysis was conducted in migraine patients with PFO who underwent PFO closure in the Department of Cardiology of Jiangsu Province Hospital from September 2020 to April 2023. Based on the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores from the 1-year follow-up after PFO closure, all patients who met the inclusion criteria were categorized into a remission group and a non-remission group. The primary efficacy endpoint was remission of migraine headache. After collecting clinical data, transcranial doppler sonography (TCD) results and MIDAS scores, LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to filter variables predictive to migraine remission and construct the nomogram model. The Nomogram's accuracy and consistency were respectively assessed through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curves. Additionally, an analysis of decision curves (DCA) was conducted to evaluate the clinical utility of this newly developed model. RESULT: A total of 241 consecutive patients were included in the study. The remission group included 21 males and 93 females, with a median age of 39 (30.25,50) years. The non-remission group included 26 males and 101 females, with a median age of 35 (25.5,47.5) years. All Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that 5 independent predictors, including MIDAS before closure (p = 0.0002), mitigating factors (p = 0.0057), number of attacks/month (p = 0.0058), TCD (p = 0.0093) and Platelet Crit (PCT) (p = 0.0351), played a significant role in the prediction of remission of migraine patients with PFO after closure. Based on these independent predictors, the predictive nomogram model of migraine remission in PFO patients was constructed. The application of the nomogram in the training cohort exhibited good discrimination (area under the ROC curve was 0.7763[95% CI 0.7108-0.8418]), which was confirmed in the validation cohort (AUC was 0.704[95% CI 0.5533-0.8547]). The calibration curve showed that the nomogram model demonstrated good calibration performance. Additionally, the decision curve analysis indicated the clinical utility of the nomogram model. CONCLUSION: The construction of the nomogram model had a considerable predictive accuracy for migraine remission in patients after PFO closure, which may provide constructive guidance for clinical decision making.

A Patent Foramen Ovale With an Atrial Septal Aneurysm in a Patient Presenting With Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an embryogenic remnant that can be found in healthy adults with no repercussions. However, it poses a risk of paradoxical embolism. In patients with known embolic stroke, the risk of recurrence is greater. A PFO can be accompanied by morphological variants such as atrial septal aneurysms (ASA). These have been shown to further increase the risk of stroke and embolism. This is a case of a patient who presented to the emergency department with deep vein thrombosis and sub-massive pulmonary embolism. An echocardiogram showed a PFO with an ASA as an incidental finding. The defect was closed with a transcatheter PFO closure device due to a high risk of paradoxical embolism.

Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Stroke and Beyond.

Over 750,000 individuals suffer from stroke annually in the United States, with 87% of these strokes being ischemic in nature. Roughly 40% of ischemic strokes occur in individuals 60 years of age or under. A quarter of all ischemic strokes have no identifiable cause despite extensive workup and are deemed cryptogenic in nature. Patent Foramen Ovales (PFO) has been postulated in stroke causation by either paradoxical embolization or platelet activation in the tunnel of the defect. The incidence of PFO is reported to be 15-25% in the general population but rises to 40% in patients with cryptogenic stroke. While the initial trials evaluating PFO closures were non-revealing, subsequent long-term follow-ups, as well as recent trials evaluating PFO closures in cryptogenic stroke patients 60 years of age or under, demonstrated the superiority of percutaneous closure compared to medical therapy alone, leading to FDA approval of PFO closure devices. In this review, we review the diagnosis of PFO, postulated stroke mechanisms, literature supporting PFO closure, patient selection for percutaneous closure, procedural considerations, and associated procedural complications.

Amplatzer or Figulla Flex II Occluder: a comparative study of outcomes after transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure.

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) for the prevention of recurrent paradoxical thromboembolic events has been shown to be safe and effective in randomized controlled trials. However, it remains uncertain if differences in the structure and design of the occluder devices impact the outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare results of percutaneous PFO closure using 2 widely used double-disc occluders. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous PFO closure with the Abbott Amplatzer occluder (APO) or the Occlutech Figulla-Flex-II occluder (OPO) at the Heart Center Lucerne between February 2017 and December 2022 were included in a registry. The primary endpoint was effective closure of the PFO, defined as a residual shunt grade 0 or 1, assessed by contrast echocardiogram at 6-month follow-up. Secondary endpoints included procedural efficacy/safety and major adverse cardiovascular events during the hospital stay and at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three consecutive patients (mean age 51.7 ± 12.5 years; 39% women; Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score = 7, IQR = 6-8) underwent percutaneous PFO closure with the APO (120 patients, 62.2%) or the OPO (73 patients, 37.8%). Main indications for closure were crypotogenic stroke in 168 patients (87.1%) and peripheral embolism in 13 patients (6.7%). At baseline, right-to-left shunt (RLS) greater than or equal to grade 2 was present in 189 patients (97.9%). Immediate procedural success was 99.5%. In 1 patient, an air embolism occurred during positioning of the APO occluder with transient chest pain and electrocardiogram changes, but without further sequelae to the patient. At 6-month follow-up, effective closure was achieved in 185 patients (95.8%; APO: 96.6% vs OPO: 94.5%, P = .30). Rates of atrial fibrillation and recurrent thromboembolic events were 4.2 and 0.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PFO closure is safe and effective when performed with either the self-expanding Abbott Amplatzer or Occlutech Figulla Flex II PFO occluder.

Late thrombosis of Gore Cardioform septal occluder device in a patient with history of patent foramen ovale closure.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a flaplike opening in the fossa ovalis; between the septum primum and secundum. It is highly prevalent with approximately 25% of the population having a PFO. It is usually asymptomatic but can rarely cause paradoxical embolism leading to stroke and/or significant right to left shunting causing hypoxia. The complications of PFO closure with a percutaneous device include embolization, cardiac perforation, and thrombosis. These are all early complications. We describe the case of a patient with a history of PFO closure who had device thrombosis 3 years after implantation. Management includes anticoagulation with warfarin. Repeat cardiac imaging to document the resolution of thrombosis is recommended.

Predictors of recurrent cerebral ischemia after patent foramen ovale closure: A single center observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure lowers recurrent stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack with an indication for closure. However, the incidence of recurrent stroke is not negligible and underlying pathophysiology remains largely unknown. We sought to evaluate the prevalence of recurrent ischemic neurological events and to assess its predictors after transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients who underwent patent foramen ovale closure for secondary prevention of neurological ischemic events at the University Hospital of Parma between 2006 and 2021. Clinical and procedure-related features were collected for each patient. The incidence of recurrent ischemic neurological events was assessed at follow-up. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 169 patients with mean Risk of Paradoxical Embolism score at hospital admission of 6.4 ± 1.5. The primary indication was previous cryptogenic stroke (94 [55.6 %] subjects), followed by transient ischemic attack (75 [44.4 %]). Among patients with complete outcome data (n= 154), after a median follow-up of 112 months, recurrent cerebral ischemia occurred in 13 [8.4 %], with an annualized rate of 0.92/100 patients. The presence of obesity [OR 5.268, p = 0.018], Risk of Paradoxical Embolism score < 7 [OR 5.991, p = 0.035] and migraine [OR = 5.932 p = 0.012] were independent positive predictors of recurrent stroke/ transient ischemic attack after patent foramen ovale closure. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of obesity, Risk of Paradoxical Embolism score < 7 and migraine were independent positive predictors of recurrent ischemic neurological events after patent foramen ovale closure.

Crochetage, the Forgotten Electrocardiographic Sign.

Acquired complete heart block is a rare but severe arrhythmia caused by various factors such as infections, medications, and autoimmune conditions. Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart defect, with larger ASDs possibly causing symptoms such as fatigue, shortness of breath, and frequent respiratory infections. In some cases, high-grade atrioventricular block with ASD can occur; however, the exact incidence is not well established. We report a rare case of a 15-year-old male presenting with acute dizziness. Initial electrocardiogram (EKG) showed a complete heart block with a Crochetage sign. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) was confirmed by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiograms. Closure of PFO and permanent pacemaker resulted in complete resolutions of symptoms and disappearance of Crochetage sign.

Coronary air embolism during transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure for platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome in a patient with severe respiratory disorder: a case report.

Background: Coronary air embolism (CAE) is a rare and life-threatening complication of endovascular procedures, mostly due to procedure-related causes. Case summary: A 70-year-old man with severe respiratory disorder presented with patent foramen ovale (PFO)-related platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome (POS). Transcatheter PFO closure was performed under local anaesthesia and intracardiac echocardiographic guidance. After a 5-Fr catheter was passed through the PFO via a 7-Fr femoral vein sheath, the patient suddenly coughed and breathed deeply. Thereafter, intracardiac echocardiography showed massive microbubbles in all cardiac chambers and the ascending aorta, and an electrocardiogram showed ST-segment elevations in the anterior and inferior leads. Emergency coronary angiography confirmed occlusion of the mid-left anterior descending artery, suggesting CAE. As the intracoronary infusion of saline, nitroglycerine, and nicorandil was ineffective, we performed air aspiration using a thrombectomy device, achieving coronary blood flow improvement and ST-segment resolution. Thereafter, positive pressure support using manual bag-valve-mask ventilation under intravenous sedation supported successful transcatheter PFO closure without further air embolization. Discussion: In this case with severe respiratory dysfunction, spontaneous deep breathing (spontaneous Valsalva manoeuvre) caused negative intrathoracic pressure and large drops in intravascular pressure. This phenomenon might have induced air contamination during device advancement, either by entrapping or leaving residual air in the gaps between the catheter and the sheath. Additionally, PFO with right-to-left shunts is more likely to cause paradoxical air embolization. Thus, the spontaneous Valsalva manoeuvre should be avoided with appropriate respiratory management to prevent paradoxical air embolization, including CAE, during transcatheter PFO closure under local anaesthesia in severe respiratory dysfunction patients.

Long-term risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events after patent foramen ovale closure: Results from a real-world stroke cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Patent foramen ovale (PFO)-closure is recommended for stroke prevention in selected patients with suspected PFO-associated stroke. However, studies on cerebrovascular event recurrence after PFO-closure are limited by relatively short follow-up periods and information on the underlying aetiology of recurrent events is scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients with a cerebral ischaemic event and PFO-closure at the University Hospital Graz were prospectively identified from 2004 to 2021. Indication for PFO-closure was based on a neurological-cardiological PFO board decision. Patients underwent standardized clinical and echocardiographic follow-up 6 months after PFO-closure. Recurrent cerebrovascular events were assessed via electronical health records. RESULTS: PFO-closure was performed in 515 patients (median age: 49 years; Amplatzer PFO occluder: 42%). Over a median follow-up of 11 years (range: 2-18 years, 5141 total patient-years), recurrent ischaemic cerebrovascular events were observed in 34 patients (ischaemic stroke: n = 22, TIA: n = 12) and associated with age, hyperlipidaemia and smoking in multivariable analysis (p < 0.05 each). Large artery atherosclerosis and small vessel disease were the most frequent aetiologies of recurrent stroke/TIA (27% and 24% respectively), and only two events were related to atrial fibrillation (AF). Recurrent ischaemic cerebrovascular event rates and incident AF were comparable in patients treated with different PFO occluders (p > 0.1). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In this long-term follow-up-study of patients with a cerebral ischaemic event who had received PFO-closure with different devices, rates of recurrent stroke/TIA were low and largely related to large artery atherosclerosis and small vessel disease. Thorough vascular risk factor control seems crucial for secondary stroke prevention in patients treated for PFO-related stroke.

Cardiac Platypnea-Orthodeoxia Syndrome: A Rare Case of Flow-Directed, Right-to-Left Shunt via a Patent Foramen Ovale Exacerbated by Aortic Root Enlargement.

Cardiac platypnea-orthodeoxia is a unique clinical syndrome characterized by dyspnea and deoxygenation when moving from a supine to an upright position. In this case report, we detail the experience of a 78-year-old male with persistent hypoxemia following a paradoxical embolic ischemic stroke. Despite proper management of his respiratory symptoms, the patient continued to be affected by marked dyspnea and hypoxemia, particularly when upright or in a right-sided decubitus position. Subsequent investigation revealed that his hypoxemia was a result of cardiac platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome (POS). This condition was attributed to the enlargement of his aortic root and ascending aorta, coupled with a counterclockwise rotation of the heart axis. These factors facilitated a flow-directed, right-to-left interatrial shunt through a patent foramen ovale, even in the absence of elevated right heart pressures.

The efficacy and safety of patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Refractory Epilepsy (PFOC-RE): a prospectively randomized control trial of an innovative surgical therapy for refractory epilepsy patients with PFO of high-grade right-to-left shunt.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients with epilepsy have an unknown etiology and lack effective targeted therapeutic drugs. Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) induces hypoxia and microembolism, leading to cerebral neurological dysfunction and increased epilepsy risk. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of PFO closure for relieving epileptic seizures in patients with refractory epilepsy associated with PFO. METHODS/DESIGN: Recruitment takes place at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University, China, for an open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial. The trial will include 110 patients with refractory epilepsy and PFO. Disease diagnoses will conform to the diagnostic criteria of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) for refractory epilepsy and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) for PFO. Refractory epilepsy and high-grade right-to-left shunt (RLS) of the PFO will be further diagnosed using 24-hour video electroencephalogram and transthoracic echocardiography with contrast injection, respectively. Eligible participants require a secondary or higher volume of RLS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200065681). Registered on November 11, 2022.

Left atrial disc device thrombosis after atrial defect closure with the Gore® Cardioform septal occluder: A case series.

Device thromboses after patent foramen ovale (PFO) and atrial septal defect (ASD) closure are rare but serious complications. They have been reported in different devices of virtually all manufacturers. Here, we report three cases of left atrial device thrombosis after atrial defect closure with the Gore® Cardioform septal occluder (GSO) in our recent institutional experience. All patients were symptomatic with new-onset neurological impairments and evidence of cerebral thromboembolism. Device thromboses have occurred despite antiplatelet therapy in two patients and moreover were observed late, at approximately 2 years after implantation, in two patients. One device was surgically explanted while in two cases, thrombi completely resolved with initiated anticoagulation. All patients had a favorable neurological recovery. Our observations suggest that regular follow-up echocardiography beyond 6 months after device implantation might be advisable in patients with GSO devices to rule out late device thromboses. More long-term follow-up data considering safety and late complications of contemporary PFO and ASD devices is required to establish confident evidence-based recommendations on long-term follow-up management and antithrombotic therapy regimen after PFO and ASD closure.

Patent foramen ovale closure in non-elderly and elderly patients with cryptogenic stroke: a hospital-based cohort study.

Introduction: The efficacy of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in the elderly population is unclear. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of PFO closure in non-elderly and elderly patients. Methods: Patients over 18 years of age with cryptogenic stroke (CS) or transient ischemic attack and PFO were prospectively enrolled and classified into two groups according to treatment: (1) closure of PFO (the PFOC group) and (2) medical treatment alone (the non-PFOC group). The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent cerebral ischemic events and all-cause mortality during the follow-up period. A modified Ranking Scale [mRS] at 180 days was recorded. The safety outcomes were procedure-related adverse events and periprocedural atrial fibrillation. The results between the PFOC and non-PFOC groups in non-elderly (<60 years) and elderly (≥60 years) patients were compared. Results: We enrolled 173 patients, 78 (45%) of whom were elderly. During a mean follow-up of 2.5 years, the incidence of primary outcome was significantly lower in the PFOC group (6.2% vs. 17.1%, hazard ratio[HR] = 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.97, p = 0.043) in adjusted Cox regression analysis. Compared with the non-PFOC group, the PFOC group had a numerically lower risk of the primary outcome in both the elderly (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-1.01, p = 0.051) and the non-elderly (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.11-3.27, p = 0.574) groups. In addition, patients with PFO closure in the elderly group had a lower median mRS at 180 days (p = 0.002). The rate of safety outcome was similar between the non-elderly and elderly groups. Discussion: PFO closure was associated with a reduced risk of the primary outcome in patients with PFO and CS in our total cohort, which included non-elderly and elderly patients. Compared to those without PFO closure, elderly patients with PFO closure had a better functional outcome at 180 days. PFO closure might be considered in selected elderly patients with PFO.

Transjugular patent foramen ovale closure in a young patient with stroke caused by inferior vena cava thrombus: a different method with balloon anchor support to pulmonary vein.

Patent foramen ovale closure is recommended for patients who are at risk for recurrent paradoxical embolism and cryptogenic stroke. The standard technique of patent foramen ovale closure is established from the femoral vein. However, alternative methods may be necessary for patent foramen ovale closure as in every interventional procedure. A 45-year-old female patient with an intramural giant uterine myoma had a history of recurrent deep vein thrombosis and stroke. A diffuse thrombus was detected in both iliac veins associated with inferior vena cava compression of the myoma. Also, a patent foramen ovale was revealed on echocardiography as a cause of embolic events. Hysterectomy was initially planned by gynaecology, but due to the possible risk of embolisation of inferior vena cava thrombus and stroke after removal of the compressive mass during hysterectomy, initial patent foramen ovale closure and then hysterectomy was scheduled in the Gynecology-Cardiology-Cardivascular Surgery council. Patent foramen ovale closure was performed via the right jugular vein approach. But because of the tight left atrial ostium of the patent foramen ovale, the catheter could not pass to the left atrium from the right atrium. With an anchor of a 5.0 × 15 mm coronary balloon over a 0.014-inch guidewire to the pulmonary vein, we were able to reach the left atrium. The patent foramen ovale was closed successfully, and the patient underwent a hysterectomy after closure without any embolic event. The patient was asymptomatic at 6 months of control.

Monitoring for atrial fibrillation prior to patent foramen ovale closure after cryptogenic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Patients who had a cryptogenic stroke (CS) suspected to be causally related to a patent foramen ovale (PFO) are candidates for percutaneous PFO closure. In such patients, it is important to screen for atrial fibrillation (AF). Limited guidance is available regarding AF monitoring strategies in CS patients with PFO addressing optimal monitoring technology and duration. AIM: To provide a narrative review of cardiac rhythm monitoring in CS patients considered for PFO closure, including current practices, stroke recurrences after CS, findings from monitoring studies in CS patients, and predictors for AF detection published in the literature. To propose a personalized strategy for cardiac monitoring in CS patients, accounting for aspects predicting AF detection. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: AF detection in CS patients is predicted by age, left atrial enlargement, prolonged PR interval, frequent premature atrial contractions, interatrial conduction block, diabetes, prior brain infarctions, leukoaraiosis, elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)/N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, and a family history of AF, as well as composed scores (e.g. CHA2DS2-VASc, atrial fibrillation in embolic stroke of undetermined source (AF-ESUS)). The causal role of the PFO may be accounted for by the risk of paradoxical embolism (RoPE) score and/or the PFO-Associated Stroke Causal Likelihood (PASCAL) classification. CONCLUSION: A personalized approach to AF detection in CS patients is proposed, accounting for the likelihood of AF detection and aimed at obtaining sufficient confidence regarding the absence of AF in patients considered for PFO closure. In addition, the impact of high-risk PFO features on the monitoring strategy is discussed.