Development of a Quality Indicator Set for the Optimal Acute Management of Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Australian Context.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based set of indicators of high-quality acute moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI) clinical management that can be used to measure structure, process, and outcome factors that are likely to influence patient outcomes. This is the first stage of the PRECISION-TBI program, which is a prospective cohort study that aims to identify and promote optimal clinical management of msTBI in Australia. METHODS: A preliminary set of 45 quality indicators was developed based on available evidence. An advisory committee of established experts in the field refined the initial indicator set in terms of content coverage, proportional representation, contamination, and supporting evidence. The refined indicator set was then distributed to a wider Delphi panel for assessment of each indicator in terms of validity, measurement feasibility, variability, and action feasibility. Inclusion in the final indicator set was contingent on prespecified inclusion scoring. RESULTS: The indicator set was structured according to the care pathway of msTBI and included prehospital, emergency department, neurosurgical, intensive care, and rehabilitation indicators. Measurement domains included structure indicators, logistic indicators, and clinical management indicators. The Delphi panel consisted of 44 participants (84% physician, 12% nursing, and 4% primary research) with a median of 15 years of practice. Of the 47 indicators included in the second round of the Delphi, 32 indicators were approved by the Delphi group. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a set of 32 quality indicators that can be used to structure data collection to drive quality improvement in the clinical management of msTBI. They will also be used to guide feedback to PRECISION-TBI's participating sites.

Compliance of Surgical Care in Patients with Carcinoma Endometrium in a Tertiary Care Centre in South India, to European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (ESGO) Quality Indicators.

To analyse the compliance of surgical care provided to patients diagnosed with carcinoma endometrium, to the European Society of Gynaeacological Oncology (ESGO) quality indicators. This is a retrospective audit done in the Department of Gynaecologic Oncology. Electronic medical records of patients who underwent surgical management of carcinoma endometrium from January 2020 to December 2021 were assessed. A total of 163 patients had undergone primary surgery, and 2 patients had surgery for recurrence. The audit showed that the target for categories of general indicators and pre-operative work-up was met. There was lack in compliance to the intraoperative management, with only 34% among presumed early-stage disease undergoing successful MIS, 31% undergoing sentinel lymph node procedure and 53% among them being done using indocyanine green with 18% bilateral mapping rate. None of the patients had complete molecular classification. Compliance to adjuvant treatment provided was adequate. Minimal required elements in surgical reports were in 81% and pathological reports in 91% of patients falling short of the set target. The audit helped us identify the need to increase MIS and use and adapt sentinel lymph node procedure with ICG dye more aggressively. There also is a need for improvement in documentation of pertinent information on surgical and pathology reporting. Molecular classification should be routinely incorporated into the diagnostic algorithm to aid in adjuvant therapy.

Comparison of soil quality assessment methods for different vegetation eco-restoration techniques at engineering disturbed areas.

Scientific assessment of soil quality is the foundation of sustainable vegetation eco-restoration in engineering disturbed areas. This study aimed to find a qualitative and comprehensive method for assessing soil quality after vegetation eco-restoration in engineering disturbed areas. Sixteen soil indicators were used at six vegetation eco-restoration sites as the potential soil indicators. A minimum data set (MDS) and revised minimum data set (RMDS) were determined by principal component analysis. Six soil quality indices (SQIs) of varying scoring functions based on different data sets were employed in this study. Significant positive correlations were observed among all six SQIs, indicating that the effects of different vegetation eco-restoration measures on soil quality could be quantified by all six SQIs. The SQI values of the vegetation concrete eco-restoration slope (VC), frame beam filling soil slope (FB), thick layer base material spraying slope (TB), and external-soil spray seeding slope (SS) were all significantly higher than the SQI value of the abandoned slag slope (AS). It is noteworthy that the SQIs of the VC and TB sites were also significantly higher than the SQI of the natural forest (NF) site. These results indicate that the application of artificial remediation measures can significantly improve the soil quality of the disturbed area at the Xiangjiaba hydropower station. The results of this study also indicate that the SQI-NLRM method is a practical and accurate quantitative tool for soil quality assessment and is recommended for evaluating soil quality under various vegetation eco-restoration techniques in disturbance areas at the Xiangjiaba hydropower station and in other areas with similar habitat characteristics.

A comprehensive approach to continuous quality improvement of massive transfusion by developing key performance indicators.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To develop key performance indicators (KPI) for use in quality assessment of our institutional goal-directed massive transfusion (GDMT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A team comprising our transfusion and emergency medicine departments carried out a cross-sectional data analysis of GDMT in adult patients from January 2021 to December 2022. The study was rooted in the Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control (DMAIC) approach. Features of KPIs were (a) importance, (b) scientific soundness and (c) feasibility. Study parameters were defined and analysed using measures of central tendencies and benchmark comparison. RESULTS: Ninety-two massive transfusion events occurred and 1405 blood components were used. Trauma was the leading cause, followed by postpartum haemorrhage and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Appropriate GDMT activation was observed only in 43.47% of events. The turnaround time (TAT) was within the benchmark in 85.8% of events with an average of 16 ± 10 min. The average utilization of blood components was 20.5 (interquartile range [IQR] = 11.3) in the appropriate group and 5.5 (IQR = 4.25) in the inappropriate group with a wastage rate of 3.5%. Duration of activation was 6.19 ± 4.59 h, and the adherence to thromboelastography was 66.3%. Overall mortality was 45.65%, and the average duration of hospital stay was 6.1 ± 5.9 days. CONCLUSION: The KPIs developed were easy to capture, and the analysis provided a comprehensive approach to the quality improvement of the GDMT protocol.

Cell throughput and performance ratio as quality indicators on hematopoietic stem cell apheresis: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Benchmarking in CD34+ cell apheresis is crucial for optimizing resources, ensuring consistent collection performance, and ultimately, decision-making algorithms to improve donor safety. Key performance indicators such as the "performance ratio" (PR) are applied routinely in some apheresis centers, whereas this report identifies the "cell throughput" (CT) as another quality indicator in apheresis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This single-center study includes retrospective data from 117 aphereses. CT and PR were calculated based on the mononuclear cell collection (MNC) or continuous mononuclear cell collection (cMNC) protocols of the Spectra Optia® apheresis system, types of venous access, transplant settings, and mobilization regimens. RESULTS: CTs (× 106 CD34+ cells/min) were found to be greater in cMNC compared to MNC protocols (1.4 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0037), in allogeneic versus autologous (1.3 vs. 1.1, p = 0.0274), and in the mobilization regimen of G-CSF alone versus the G-CSF combined (1.3 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0249). In contrast, PR (%) was only statistically significant in favor of the cMNC protocol (213.0 vs. 186.8 for MNC). CONCLUSIONS: CT and PR are feasible quality indicators on CD34+ cell apheresis, are easy to calculate and implement, and have clinical and administrative implications. Analyzing CT and PR may strengthen the institutional criteria for selecting cMNC or MNC protocols; they may also be used to evaluate the performance of new personnel or cell separator devices or, eventually, trigger investigations for those aphereses under-collected by specific thresholds.

Quality indicators for occupational therapy: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Occupational therapists are increasingly asked to demonstrate the effectiveness, appropriateness, and efficiency of their interventions to funding bodies. However, the extent to which this is practiced and the health policy context within which such a practice is situated differs internationally. The aim of this scoping review was to establish which quality indicators are used internationally for this purpose. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review, limiting our search to Europe and the English-speaking world. To search for suitable literature, we used specialized databases from medicine, health sciences, and related fields, including CINAHL Complete and MEDLINE, as well as free internet search via Google. Furthermore, we contacted national occupational therapy associations from several countries asking for access to documents found within this search that were only accessible to association members. RESULTS: The screening process identified 32 studies and documents from six national contexts. We identified and described process-level indicators, functional outcome indicators, one outcome indicator based on individual goal attainment (the Goal Attainment Scale, or GAS), and PRO-Ergo, a patient-reported experience measure (PREM). There was little information on the use of quality indicators to demonstrate the effectiveness, appropriateness, and efficiency of occupational therapy services to funding bodies in Europe and the English-speaking world that was openly available. The identified process indicators were in most cases not specific to occupational therapy interventions. Functional outcome indicators were highly specific to certain client groups or health conditions and partially appropriate for use in occupational therapy. The GAS was found to be a highly customizable measure which allowed an evaluation on body structure and function levels as well as activity and participation levels. PRO-Ergo was focused on the clients' subjective view and their experience with occupational therapy interventions. CONCLUSIONS: All identified quality indicators have advantages and disadvantages. Process-level indicators specific to occupational therapy could be a chance to foster the use of best practice methods. GAS and PRO-Ergo seem to be the most versatile assessment, allowing an evaluation on the level of activity and participation. Functional outcome indicators that cover a broad area of client problems may be useful additional quality indicators for some areas of practice.

Quality Indicators for Pediatric Bronchiolitis and Croup Care in the Emergency Department; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: As the quality of care for respiratory diseases in pediatric patients in emergency departments (EDs) becomes increasingly important, this systematic review aims to evaluate the current quality indicators (QIs) specifically designed for the ED management of pediatric bronchiolitis and croup. Methods: We conducted searches in four electronic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and MEDLINE) from their inception up to February 2024. We focused on English-language qualitative and quantitative publications that suggested or described at least one indicator initiative related to ED care for pediatrics with bronchiolitis and croup diseases. These publications were identified by two reviewers, independently. We extracted study characteristics, all relevant QIs reported, and the percentage of compliance with these QIs, where available. All QIs identified from expert panels and observational studies were grouped by definition and categorized by the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) and Donabedian's frameworks for healthcare quality. The percentage of compliance with the identified QIs as reported by observational studies was pooled using a random effect meta-analysis, when appropriate. Results: A total of 17 studies were identified, comprising 5 expert panel studies and 12 observational studies. Altogether, these studies reported 126 QIs for potential use in EDs for pediatric bronchiolitis and croup patients. Of these, 55 QIs were reported by expert panel studies, and 71 by observational studies. Specifically, 81 QIs were related to bronchiolitis, while 45 pertained to croup patients. In terms of the Donabedian domain, most indicators (96.5%) measured the process of care while a smaller fraction (3.5%) addressed care outcomes. In the Institute of Medicine (IOM) domain, most indicators focused on effectiveness and safety. Observational studies reported the percentage of compliance for 35 QIs identified in the expert studies. It was noted that compliance with these QIs varied significantly between studies and health sectors. Conclusions: The findings of this systematic review highlight significant disparities in compliance to the established QIs, which underscores the urgent need for dedicated strategies to enhance the treatment of pediatric bronchiolitis and croup in ED settings.

Predictive utility of self-efficacy in early stroke rehabilitation.

INTRODUCTION: A biopsychosocial approach entailing person-centered factors provides valuable insight to post-stroke rehabilitation potential. The consideration of an individual's belief in their capabilities, known as self-efficacy, may prove especially informative in the inpatient rehabilitation setting where motor learning often occurs. OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive utility of self-efficacy in functional independence status change during inpatient rehabilitation. METHODS: Individuals with stroke admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) completed an assessment battery near IRF admission and discharge involving motor assessments, participant-reported self-efficacy (Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire), and functional independence status evaluation (sum of self-care and mobility Quality Indicators (QI) from the IRF-Patient Assessment Instrument). Linear regression was performed to determine the predictive performance of self-efficacy on QI change during IRF stay while accounting for age, time post-stroke, and IRF length of stay. Regression procedures were repeated for separate subgroups based on initial motor impairment level. RESULTS: Thirty individuals with stroke (14 females, age = 67.0 ± 9.80 years, 10.4 ± 3.46 days post-stroke) were enrolled. Self-efficacy at IRF admission explained a significant percentage of variance in QI Change for the cohort (R2 = 30.7%, p = .001) and for the moderate to severe motor impairment subgroup (n = 12; R2 = 49.9%, p = .010). After accounting for confounders, self-efficacy remained a significant predictor for the cohort (n = 30) model. DISCUSSION: Findings generated from this work support the predictive utility of self-efficacy in early post-stroke motor recovery. The inclusion of self-efficacy in a multi-faceted evaluation framework may therefore optimize rehabilitation outcomes by providing therapists with additional knowledge to better tailor an individual's care.

Midwife-led quality improvement: Increasing the use of evidence-based birth practices in Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Addressing the evidence-to-practice gap in midwifery is vital for improving maternal and newborn health outcomes. Despite the potential of involving midwives in quality improvement interventions to address this gap, such interventions are understudied. In a Ugandan urban hospital, midwifery practices with a significant evidence-to-practice gap have been identified as areas for clinical improvement. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the Quality Improvement was to increase the uptake of identified and essential midwifery practices through a quality improvement approach led by midwives. PARTICIPANTS: We enrolled 703 women aged 18 years and older with uncomplicated full-term pregnancies (between 37+0 and 42+0 weeks) who gave birth at the facility. INTERVENTION: The intervention focused on evidence-based practices with an identified evidence-to-practice gap: dynamic birth position, including women's involvement in birth position decision-making, perineal protection and intrapartum support. A team of midwives led a seven-month co-created quality improvement intervention. The intervention used Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, following the Model for Improvement and included a train-the-trainer approach and weekly online support meetings. DATA COLLECTION: In this single-case prospective observational study, we compared pre-, during and post-intervention uptake of evidence-based practices. Trained research assistants collected data through interviews and observations. RESULTS: We observed improvements in the uptake of all clinical improvement areas. Dynamic birth positions increased from 0 % to 79 %, decision-making of birth positions from 0 % to 75 %, perineal protection measures from 62 % to 92 % and intrapartum support from 7 % to 67 %. CONCLUSION: A multifactorial midwife-led Quality Improvement resulted in significant and sustained improvements in the uptake of evidence-based practices in maternal and newborn healthcare. If given the mandate and time, midwives can successfully lead Quality Improvements, which enhance the quality of care and close the evidence-to-practice gaps in maternal and newborn health. The study's results underscore the significance of developing effective strategies to enhance care quality and promote the adoption of evidence-based midwifery practices.

The European Society of Cardiology quality indicators in atrial fibrillation in centers of excellence in Spain: the SEC-EXCELLENCE in AF registry.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: By 2022, 9 centers had been accredited by the Spanish Society of Cardiology for the atrial fibrillation (AF) process. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of these centers based on the quality indicators (QIs) proposed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) in 2020. METHODS: Adults with AF who were attended in the cardiology departments of participating centers during the second week of May 2019 were included in a retrospective registry (n = 797, age 72 ± 11 years, 60% male). Key ESC QIs were assessed. RESULTS: CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED scores, and serum creatinine levels were documented in 24.9%, 6.1%, and 96.2% of patients, respectively. Anticoagulation was appropriately prescribed in 90.6% of high-risk patients according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score, but was inappropriately prescribed in 57.8% of low-risk patients. Among all patients, 84.1% received high-quality anticoagulation. Inappropriate antiarrhythmic drugs were prescribed in 7.2% of patients with permanent AF, 2.9% of those with structural heart disease, and 0.0% of those with end-stage kidney disease. Catheter ablation was offered to 70% of patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF after the failure or intolerance of 1 antiarrhythmic drug. All modifiable risk factors were documented in 59.3% of patients. Rates of all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, and major bleeding were 8.1, 0.8, and 2.56 per 100 patients/y, respectively. QIs for anticoagulation and outcomes were similar between general cardiology and tertiary referral centers. CONCLUSIONS: Although accredited centers in Spain demonstrated good performance in many of the ESC QIs for AF, there remains room for improvement. These data could serve as a starting point for enhancing the quality of care in this population.

How Do Nurses Experience Relational Work in the Emergency Department-Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to explore how nurses experience relational work in the emergency department. METHODS: A qualitative design with 34 focus group interviews using an abductive thematic analysis were completed for this study. Participants were recruited from an annual mandatory continuous learning program in 2020-2022 at 2 university hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark. We applied semistructured interviews in an instructor-supported reflection session on the topic "relational nursing care." Group discussion was supported by an interview guide addressing key elements of the nurse-patient relationship as described in the fundamentals of care framework. RESULTS: Acute care nurses' attention was primarily directed toward the initial patient assessment, rather than toward the later stages of the patient trajectory. Forming a relationship with the patient was highly individual and done at the discretion of each nurse. The key elements of relational nursing were not mutually exclusive, but the findings could be separated into biomedical and relational care, where biomedical tasks took precedence. DISCUSSION: Relational care in the emergency department is optional and individually performed. Moreover, emergency nurses lack a vocabulary to express this type of work. Consequently, there is a risk that patients' psychosocial needs are not sufficiently met. According to the emergency nurses participating in this study, nurses fall short when performing and describing relational care. Nurses need more knowledge to address the psychosocial patient needs during short-term hospital admissions. Relational care and patient centeredness also need to be acknowledged by nursing leaders and further developed.

Managing Newborn Screening Repeat Collections for Sick and Preterm Neonates.

Some preterm and sick neonates have altered biochemical profiles and follow-up newborn screening (NBS) collections are recommended. The Victorian NBS program historically recommended repeat collections for babies with birth weight < 1500 g (managed by the maternity service provider) and 3 weeks post-transfusion (managed by the laboratory). We aimed to determine adherence to current guidelines and review the guidelines to improve NBS performance. To do this, we audited data from 348,584 babies between January 2018 and June 2022. Babies with a recorded birth weight of <1500 g were filtered for inclusion. For the overall review and visualization of the protocol, we sourced information from the literature, our professional society and tertiary hospital services. A total of 2647 babies had a birth weight recorded between 200 and 1499 g. Of these, 2036 (77%) had a second sample collected, indicating that >1 in 5 babies were not receiving a follow-up collection. Our timing of repeat collections for transfused babies, requiring a 3-week follow-up collection, was longer than in other Australasian jurisdictions. A new combined "sick-prem protocol" was launched to support repeat collections and after a 1-year review achieved 95% compliance. We recommend NBS laboratories audit preterm and sick neonate repeat collections to ensure appropriate follow-up. This should be supported with a visual process map to aid education and compliance.

Effect of early multi-professional mobilization on quality indicators of intensive care in a less economically developed country: an action on "Rehabilitation 2030" in Brazil: Effects of early mobilization in Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of implementing early multi-professional mobilization on quality indicators of intensive care in Brazil. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A Brazilian educational and research-intensive care unit (ICU). PARTICIPANTS: 1047 patients hospitalized from May 2016 to April 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of early multi-professional mobilization by the MobilizAÇÃO Program (MAP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical, ventilation and safety quality indicators, and physical function before (pre-program period) and after (post-program period) the MAP. RESULTS: There was a reduction in sedation time (4 vs. 1 day), hospital stay (21 vs. 14 days) and ICU stay (14 vs. 7 days), mechanical ventilation (8 vs. 4 days), hospital death rate (46 vs. 26%) (p<0.001) and ICU readmission (21 vs. 16%; p=0.030) from pre to post MAP. Successful weaning (42 vs. 55%) and discharge rate (50 vs. 71%) (p <0.001) increased after MAP. No differences were found to safety quality indicators between periods. After MAP, complex physical functions assessed by the Manchester Mobility Score (MMS) were more frequent. The in-bed intervention was a predictor for readmission (p=0.009; R²=0.689) and death (p=0.035; R²=0.217), while walking was a predictor for successful weaning (p=0.030; R²=0.907) and discharge (p=0.033; R²=0.373). The post-program period was associated with the MMS at ICU discharge (p<0.001; R²=0.40). CONCLUSION: Early mobilization implementation through changes in low mobility culture and multi-professional actions improved quality indicators, including clinical, ventilation, and physical functional quality, without compromising patient safety in the ICU.

Intensive Care Quality Indicators Dashboard Using Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model.

This paper presents the development of a visualization dashboard for quality indicators in intensive care units (ICUs), using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM). The dashboard enables the user to visualize quality indicator data using histograms, pie charts and tables. Our project uses the OMOP CDM, ensuring a seamless implementation of our dashboard across various hospitals. Future directions for our research include expanding the dashboard to incorporate additional quality indicators and evaluating clinicians' feedback on its effectiveness.

Feasibility of Calculating Indicators for Intensive Care Unit Antibiotic Use Based on Routine Electronic Health Record Data.

This study evaluated the feasibility of utilizing routinely collected EHR data to calculate pre-developed quality indicators on antibiotic use. Three out of four indicators were found feasible. Main barriers included local codes for lab tests and surveillance cultures and lack of data on empirical prescription. Future studies should include data from multiple ICUs to test the variations in QIs between ICUs.

Towards Efficient Value-Based Healthcare Measurement Across Hospital Care Pathways - A Scoping Review.

Hospitals widely employ value-based healthcare (VBHC) to effectively manage healthcare quality. VBHC aims to maximize patient outcomes while minimizing costs by using quality measurements. The Dutch Erasmus Medical Centre experiences challenges with the time-consuming efforts to collect, evaluate, and present value-based quality measurements. Using similar VBHC measurement indicators across multiple care pathways could reduce these efforts. This study aims to identify such generic indicators for evaluating and monitoring VBHC across care pathways. A scoping review resulted in 33 articles from which indicators for VBHC measurement were extracted, aggregated and categorized using Donabedian's Structure-Process-Outcome model. The results of this study can inform researchers and VBHC practitioners on generic quality measurement indicators for VBHC management and guide future system development to facilitate the inclusion of standardized quality indicators in healthcare information systems.

Presentation, care, coronary intervention and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI according to age: insights from the international prospective ACVC-EAPCI EORP NSTEMI registry.

BACKGROUND: Older people less frequently receive invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for NSTEMI than younger patients. We describe care, ICA data, and in-hospital and 30-day outcomes of NSTEMI by age in a contemporary and geographically diverse cohort. METHODS: Prospective cohort study including 2947 patients with NSTEMI from 287 centres in 59 countries, stratified by age (≥75 years, n = 761). Quality of care was evaluated based on 12 guideline-recommended care interventions, and data collected on ICA. Outcomes included in hospital acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, repeat myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, BARC Type ≥3 bleeding and death, as well as 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Patients aged ≥75 years, compared with younger patients, at presentation had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and oral anticoagulation prescription (22.4% vs 7.6%, p < 0.001). Older patients less frequently received ICA than younger patients (78.6% vs 90.6%, p < 0.001) with the recorded reason more often being advanced age, comorbidities or frailty. Of those who underwent ICA, older patients more frequently demonstrated 3-vessel, 4-vessel and/or left main stem coronary artery disease compared to younger patients (49.7% vs 34.1%, p < 0.001) but less frequently received revascularisation (63.6% vs 76.9%, p < 0.001). Older patients experienced higher rates of in-hospital acute heart failure (15.0% vs 8.4%, p < 0.001) and bleeding (2.8% vs 1.3%, p = 0.006), as well as in-hospital and 30-day mortality (3.4% vs 1.3%, p < 0.001; 4.8% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001; respectively), than younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients aged ≥75 years with NSTEMI, compared with younger patients, less frequently received ICA and guideline-recommended care, and had worse short-term outcomes.

Quality of care assessment for non-small cell lung cancer patients: transforming routine care data into a continuous improvement system.

PURPOSE: The complexity of cancer care requires planning and analysis to achieve the highest level of quality. We aim to measure the quality of care provided to patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using the data contained in the hospital's information systems, in order to establish a system of continuous quality improvement. METHODS/PATIENTS: Retrospective observational cohort study conducted in a university hospital in Spain, consecutively including all patients with NSCLC treated between 2016 and 2020. A total of 34 quality indicators were selected based on a literature review and clinical practice guideline recommendations, covering care processes, timeliness, and outcomes. Applying data science methods, an analysis algorithm, based on clinical guideline recommendations, was set up to integrate activity and administrative data extracted from the Electronic Patient Record along with clinical data from a lung cancer registry. RESULTS: Through data generated in routine practice, it has been feasible to reconstruct the therapeutic trajectory and automatically calculate quality indicators using an algorithm based on clinical practice guidelines. Process indicators revealed high adherence to guideline recommendations, and outcome indicators showed favorable survival rates compared to previous data. CONCLUSIONS: Our study proposes a methodology to take advantage of the data contained in hospital information sources, allowing feedback and repeated measurement over time, developing a tool to understand quality metrics in accordance with evidence-based recommendations, ultimately seeking a system of continuous improvement of the quality of health care.

Role and benefits of infectious diseases specialists in the COVID-19 pandemic: Multilevel analysis of care provision in German hospitals using data from the Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (LEOSS) cohort.

PURPOSE: This study investigates the care provision and the role of infectious disease (ID) specialists during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: A survey was conducted at German study sites participating in the Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (LEOSS). Hospitals certified by the German Society of Infectious diseases (DGI) were identified as ID centers. We compared care provision and the involvement of ID specialists between ID and non-ID hospitals. Then we applied a multivariable regression model to analyse how clinical ID care influenced the mortality of COVID-19 patients in the LEOSS cohort. RESULTS: Of the 40 participating hospitals in the study, 35% (14/40) were identified as ID centers. Among those, clinical ID care structures were more commonly established, and ID specialists were always involved in pandemic management and the care of COVID-19 patients. Overall, 68% (27/40) of the hospitals involved ID specialists in the crisis management team, 78% (31/40) in normal inpatient care, and 80% (28/35) in intensive care. Multivariable analysis revealed that COVID-19 patients in ID centers had a lower mortality risk compared to those in non-ID centers (odds ratio: 0.61 (95% CI 0.40-0.93), p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: ID specialists played a crucial role in pandemic management and inpatient care.

2024 Update to the 2020 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Heart Failure: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Performance Measures.

This document describes performance measures for heart failure that are appropriate for public reporting or pay-for-performance programs and is meant to serve as a focused update of the "2020 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures." The new performance measures are taken from the "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines" and are selected from the strongest recommendations (Class 1 or Class 3). In contrast, quality measures may not have as much evidence base and generally comprise metrics that might be useful for clinicians and health care organizations for quality improvement but are not yet appropriate for public reporting or pay-for-performance programs. New performance measures include optimal blood pressure control in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and the use of guideline-directed medical therapy in hospitalized patients. New quality measures include the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction, the optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy prior to intervention for chronic secondary severe mitral regurgitation, continuation of guideline-directed medical therapy for patients with heart failure with improved ejection fraction, identifying both known risks for cardiovascular disease and social determinants of health, patient-centered counseling regarding contraception and pregnancy risks for individuals with cardiomyopathy, and the need for a monoclonal protein screen to exclude light chain amyloidosis when interpreting a bone scintigraphy scan assessing for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.