Anti-IL-4R versus Anti-IL-5/5R after Anti-IL-5/5R failure in asthma: an emulated target trial.

BACKGROUND: Switching biologics is now common practice in severe eosinophilic asthma. After insufficient response to anti-interleukin 5 or 5 receptor (anti-IL-5/5R), the optimal switch between an anti-IL-4R monoclonal antibody (mAb) (inter-class) or another anti-IL-5/5R drug (intra-class) remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effectiveness of these two strategies on asthma control in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and insufficient response to an anti-IL-5/5R mAb. METHODS: We emulated a target randomized trial using observational data from the RAMSES Cohort. Eligible patients were switched to an anti-IL-4R mAb or another anti-IL-5/5R drug after insufficient response to an anti-IL-5/5R mAb. The primary outcome was the change in Asthma Control Test (ACT) score at 6 months. RESULTS: Among the 2046 patients in the cohort, 151 were included in the study: 103 switched to an anti-IL-4R mAb and 48 to another anti-IL-5/5R. At 6 months, the difference in ACT score improvement was not statistically significant (mean difference groups, 0.82 [-0.47,2.10], p=0.213). The inter-class group exhibited greater cumulative reduction in oral corticosteroids dose (Pinter-intra -1.05g [-1.76, -0.34], p=0.041). The inter-class group had a better effect, although not significantly, on reducing exacerbations (Δinter-intra -0.37 [-0.77, 0.02], p=0.124) and increasing lung function (FEV1) (126.8 ml [-12.7, 266.4], p=0.124). CONCLUSION: After anti-IL-5/5R mAb insufficient response, switching to dupilumab demonstrated similar improvement in ACT scores compared to intra-class switching. However, it appeared more effective in reducing oral corticosteroid use. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these results.

Real-world data on tezepelumab in patients with severe asthma in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Tezepelumab is a novel biologic blocking thymic stromal lymphopoetin (TSLP), approved for severe asthma irrespective of biomarker levels or phenotype. OBJECTIVE: To characterize a real-world tezepelumab patient cohort and the efficacy among various asthma phenotypes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multi-center study on patients with severe asthma initiating tezepelumab. Clinical response was evaluated at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: We included 129 patients with an average age of 52.5 ± 13.1 years, 59.7% were female. The majority (86.0%) had increased T2 biomarkers, 68.2% an allergic and 31.8% an eosinophilic phenotype. 23.3% of patients were biologic-naïve. 22 (18.2%) patients discontinued tezepelumab therapy due to suspected side-effects or insufficient efficacy. At 6 months follow-up, median reduction in annualized exacerbation rate (AE) was -1 [-2.9;0.0], the reduction of oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose among patients with long term OCS therapy was -5 mg [-10;0] and asthma control test (ACT) improved by 2 [0;5] points. 80.8% demonstrated a treatment response according to Biologic Asthma Response Score. There were no significant differences in treatment response between T2-high vs. T2 low, early vs. adult onset and eosinophilic vs. non-eosinophilic asthma. Prior treatment with other biologics was associated with inferior treatment response. CONCLUSION: In this real-life cohort, including a large proportion of patients with history of previous biologic use and encompassing various subgroups, the majority responded to tezepelumab. Our data further suggest a steroid-sparing effect of tezepelumab.

Childhood severe asthma: relationship among asthma control scores, FeNO, spirometry and impulse oscillometry.

INTRODUCTION: The evaluation of the asthmatic patient is usually based on clinical and functional parameters that do not necessarily evidence the degree of airway inflammation. The aim of this study was to analyze whether clinical scores (CS) correlate with spirometry (S), impulse oscillometry (IO) and FeNO, in severe asthmatic children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicentric, prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted over a 12-month period. All SA patients (6-18 years old) followed-up in the Pulmonology Department were recruited. CS, FeNO measurements, IO and S were consecutively performed on the same day. Asthma control was ascertained using ACT and GINAq. A cut-off value of ≥ 25 parts per billion (ppb) was used to define airway inflammation. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included. ACT: 75% (n 61) were controlled; GINAq: 44.5% (n 36) were controlled; 39.5% (n 32) were partly controlled, and 16% (n 13) were uncontrolled. FeNO had a median value of 24 ppb (IQR 14-41); FeNO ≥ 25 ppb was observed in 49% of patients (n 39). ROC AUC for FeNO vs. ACT was 0.71 (95%CI 0.57-0.86), PPV 0.47, NPV 0.87, SE 0.61, SP 0.80; FeNO vs. GINAq was ROC AUC 0.69 (95%CI 0.54-0.85), PPV 0.34, NPV 0.91, SE 0.62, SP 0.77; Youden cut-off FeNO > 39 ppb for both CS. CONCLUSION: In severe asthmatic children, current symptoms control as evidenced by ACT and GINA correlates with low FeNO values. Clinical scores showed good correlation with airway inflammation.

Efficacy of Tezepelumab in Patients with Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma Across Multiple Clinically Relevant Subgroups in the NAVIGATOR Study.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with severe asthma continue to experience symptoms and exacerbations despite treatment with standard-of-care therapy. In the phase 3 NAVIGATOR study, tezepelumab significantly reduced exacerbations over 52 weeks compared with placebo in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma. This analysis assessed the efficacy of tezepelumab in reducing asthma exacerbations in various clinically relevant subgroups of patients in NAVIGATOR. METHODS: NAVIGATOR was a phase 3, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Participants (12-80 years old) with severe, uncontrolled asthma were randomized 1:1 to receive tezepelumab 210 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Pre-specified and post hoc analyses were performed to evaluate the annualized asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) over 52 weeks in clinically relevant subgroups of patients defined by baseline patient characteristics, medical history, exacerbation triggers, medication eligibility and medication use before and during the study. RESULTS: Tezepelumab reduced the AAER over 52 weeks compared with placebo across a wide range of patient subgroups assessed. Reductions in exacerbations were similar across subgroups defined by baseline patient characteristics, ranging from 48% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21, 65) to 60% (95% CI: 44, 71) in subgroups analysed by sex, smoking history and body mass index. Among the asthma-related comorbidity subgroups investigated, patients with aspirin or NSAID sensitivity had the greatest reductions in AAER with tezepelumab compared with placebo (83%; 95% CI: 66, 91). In patients eligible to receive dupilumab, tezepelumab reduced exacerbations compared with placebo by 64% (95% CI: 54, 71). Reductions in the AAER with tezepelumab compared with placebo were also observed irrespective of exacerbation trigger category and the number of asthma controller medications patients were receiving at baseline. CONCLUSION: These findings further support the benefits of tezepelumab in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and can help to inform healthcare providers' treatment decisions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NAVIGATOR (NCT03347279).

Experts' Opinion on diagnosis and management of Severe Asthma, an Indian/Low and middle-income countries (LMIC) Perspective.

Objective In this document, 9 Indian experts have evaluated the factors specific to LMICs when it came to Severe Asthma (SA) diagnosis, evaluation, biologic selection, non-biologic treatment options and follow-up.Data Sources A search was performed using 50 keywords., focusing on the Indian/LMICs perspective, in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The key areas of the search were focused on diagnosis, phenoendotyping, non-biological therapies, selecting a biologic, assessment of treatment response and management of exacerbation.Study Selections The initial search revealed 1826 articles, from these case reports, observational studies, cohort studies, non-English language papers etc were excluded and we short-listed 20 articles for each area. 5 relevant papers were selected by the experts for review.Results In LMICs SA patients may be referred to the specialist for evaluation a little late for Phenoendotyping of SA. While biologic therapy is now a standard of care, pulmonologists in LMICs may not have access to all the investigations to phenoendotype SA patients like Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), Skin prick test (SPT) etc., but phenotyping of SA patients can also be done with simple blood investigations, eosinophil count and serum immunoglobulin E (IgE). Choosing a biologic in the overlapping phenotype of SA and ACO patients is also a challenge in the LMICs.Conclusion Given the limitations of LMIC, it is important to select the right patient and explain the potential benefits of biological therapy. Non-biologic add-on therapies can be attempted in a resource-limited setting where biological therapy is not available/feasible for patients.

Predictors of exacerbation in Japanese patients with severe asthma: Analysis of the severe asthma research program (Okayama-SARP) cohort.

BACKGROUND: Because exacerbation of severe asthma decreases patients' quality of life, this study aimed to identify predictive factors for asthma exacerbation. METHODS: Japanese patients with severe asthma requiring treatment according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines ≥ Step 4 between January 2018 and August 2021 were prospectively enrolled and followed up for one year at facilities participating in the Okayama Respiratory Disease Study Group (Okayama Severe Asthma Research Program). RESULTS: A total of 85 patients (29 men and 56 women) were included. The median age was 64 (interquartile range [IQR], 51-72) years. Treatment according to GINA Steps 4 and 5 was required in 29 and 56 patients, respectively, and 44 patients (51.8%) were treated with biologics. The median peripheral-blood eosinophil count, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, IgE level, and percent predicted FEV1 (%FEV1) at enrollment were 204 (IQR, 49-436)/µL, 28 (IQR, 15-43) ppb, 172 (IQR, 56-473) IU/mL, and 80.0 (IQR, 61.1-96.1) %, respectively. Exacerbation during the previous year, asthma control test (ACT) score <20, %FEV1 <60%, and serum IL-10 level >6.7 pg/mL were associated with exacerbation during the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: Exacerbation during the previous year, low ACT score, and low %FEV1 were predictive factors of future exacerbation, even in a cohort with >50% of patients treated with biologics. Furthermore, high serum IL-10 levels might be a new predictive factor.

Work-related asthma in adults with severe asthma from the Korean Severe Asthma Registry (KoSAR).

Background: Exposure to allergens or irritants in the workplace may affect asthma control and the quality of life (QoL) of patients with asthma. Objective: To examine the prevalence and characteristics of work-related asthma (WRA) in adult patients with severe asthma. Methods: We analyzed data from the Korean Severe Asthma Registry (KoSAR), which is a nationwide multicenter observational study on severe asthma in Korea. Severe asthma was defined according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines. WRA was identified on the basis of asthma symptom aggravation at the workplace, as indicated by responses to a structured questionnaire. We compared the demographic and clinical characteristics and QoL between adult patients with severe asthma and WRA and those without WRA. Results: Among 364 patients with severe asthma who were employed at the time of enrollment, 65 (17.9%) had WRA. There were no significant differences in age, sex, obesity, or smoking history between the WRA and non-WRA groups. However, individuals with WRA exhibited a higher prevalence of anxiety (7.7% vs 2.4%, P = 0.046) and depression (12.3% vs 3.7%, P = 0.010) than those without. The levels of asthma control, lung function, and frequency of asthma exacerbations were similar between the two groups, but patients with WRA reported lower QoL, as determined by the Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adult Korean Asthmatics (56.6 ± 14.6 vs. 63.5 ± 13.9, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with severe asthma and WRA are more likely to experience anxiety and depression and have lower QoL than those without WRA.

Discovery and Validation of a Volatile Signature of Eosinophilic Airway Inflammation in Asthma.

RATIONALE: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in asthmatic breath may be associated with sputum eosinophilia. We developed a volatile biomarker-signature to predict sputum eosinophilia in asthma. METHODS: VOCs emitted into the space above sputum samples (headspace) from severe asthmatics (n=36) were collected onto sorbent tubes and analysed using thermal desorption gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS). Elastic net regression identified stable VOCs associated with sputum eosinophilia ≥3% and generated a volatile biomarker signature. This VOC signature was validated in breath samples from: (I) acute asthmatics according to blood eosinophilia ≥0.3x109cells/L or sputum eosinophilia of ≥ 3% in the UK EMBER consortium (n=65) and U-BIOPRED-IMI consortium (n=42). Breath samples were collected onto sorbent tubes (EMBER) or Tedlar bags (U-BIOPRED) and analysed by gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC×GC-MS -EMBER or GC-MS -U-BIOPRED). MAIN RESULTS: The in vitro headspace identified 19 VOCs associated with sputum eosinophilia and the derived VOC signature yielded good diagnostic accuracy for sputum eosinophilia ≥ 3% in headspace (AUROC (95% CI) 0.90(0.80-0.99), p<0.0001), correlated inversely with sputum eosinophil % (rs= -0.71, p<0.0001) and outperformed FeNO (AUROC (95% CI) 0.61(0.35-0.86). Analysis of exhaled breath in replication cohorts yielded a VOC signature AUROC (95% CI) for acute asthma exacerbations of 0.89(0.76-1.0) (EMBER cohort) with sputum eosinophilia and 0.90(0.75-1.0) in U-BIOPRED - again outperforming FeNO in U-BIOPRED 0.62 (0.33-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: We have discovered and provided early-stage clinical validation of a volatile biomarker signature associated with eosinophilic airway inflammation. Further work is needed to translate our discovery using point of care clinical sensors.

Precision medicine for severe asthma - Biological targeted therapy.

Severe asthma is a complex and heterogeneous chronic airway inflammatory disease. Current treatment strategies are increasingly focused on disease classification, facilitating the transition towards personalized medicine by integrating biomarkers and monoclonal antibodies for tailored therapeutic approaches. Several approved biological agents, including anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE), anti-interleukin (IL)-4, anti-IL-5, and anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) monoclonal antibodies, have demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing asthma exacerbations, eosinophil counts, improving lung function, minimizing oral corticosteroid usage, and enhancing patients' quality of life. The utilization of these biological agents has brought about profound transformations in the management of severe asthma. This article provides a comprehensive review on biomarkers and biological agents for severe asthma while emphasizing the increasing importance of further research into its pathogenesis and novel treatment modalities.

Evaluation of Clinical Remission in Best-Performing Severe Asthmatic Patients Treated for Three Years with Mepolizumab.

BACKGROUND: In its severe form, where possible, asthma is treated using biological drugs in order to reduce, as much as possible, the use of systemic steroids. Mepolizumab is effective for severe asthma based on key outcomes such as exacerbation and steroid dependence. Its efficacy in terms of the criteria for clinical remission in the short and long term has become of interest. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effect of mepolizumab in the achievement of clinical remission after 3 years of administration. METHODS: In this study, 71 patients who continued mepolizumab for 3 years were assessed for clinical remission according to six different published sets of remission criteria. RESULTS: According to the criteria, 39-52% of patients experienced complete remission in the first year, increasing to 51-73% at 3 years. By classifying patients according to partial and complete remission criteria, proposed by the SANI, we observe 22% of patients in partial remission at one year, achieving complete remission after three years. The baseline factors associated with earlier remission were a higher FEV1, if we consider classifications requiring an FEV1 ≥ 80%, a low OCS dose, and low FeNO levels, in the patients requiring FEV1 stabilization. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical remission is possible for patients treated with mepolizumab. The observations at three years compared with the first year indicated that the factors negatively affecting remission delayed rather than prevented it. Earlier treatment could increase the chances of remission.

Expert consensus on oral corticosteroids stewardship for the treatment of severe asthma in the Middle East and Africa.

In the Middle East and Africa (MEA) region, overuse of oral corticosteroids (OCS) for asthma management, both as burst and maintenance therapy, poses a significant challenge. Gaps in knowledge regarding the need to taper OCS in patients with severe asthma and the use of OCS in comorbid conditions have been noted. OCS stewardship can help attain optimal and effective OCS tapering along with reducing OCS overuse and over-reliance. In this paper, we discuss current practices regarding the use of OCS in asthma, globally and in the MEA region. Expert recommendations for achieving OCS stewardship in the MEA region have also been presented. Regional experts recommend increasing awareness among patients about the consequences of OCS overuse, engaging community pharmacists, and educating primary healthcare professionals about the benefits of prompt appropriate referral. Innovative local referral tools like ReferID can be utilized to refer patients with asthma to specialist care. The experts also endorse a multidisciplinary team approach and accelerating access to newer medicines like biologics to implement OCS stewardship and optimize asthma care in the MEA region.

Prevalence and burden of difficult-to-treat and severe asthma in Australia: A national population survey.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Most evidence about difficult-to-treat and severe asthma (DTTA) comes from clinical trials and registries. We aimed to identify people with DTTA from a large nationally representative asthma population and describe their characteristics and healthcare utilization compared with people whose asthma was not 'difficult-to-treat'. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of Australians aged ≥18 years with current asthma from large web-based survey panels. Enrolment was stratified by gender, age-group and state/territory based on national population data for people with asthma. Difficult-to-treat or severe asthma was defined by poor symptom control, exacerbations and/or oral corticosteroid/biologic use despite medium/high-dose inhaled therapy. Outcomes included exacerbations, healthcare utilization, multimorbidity, quality of life and coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19)-related behaviour. Weighted data were analysed using SAS version 9.4. RESULTS: The survey was conducted in February-March 2021. The weighted sample comprised 6048 adults with current asthma (average age 47.3 ± SD 18.1 years, 59.9% female), with 1313 (21.7%) satisfying ≥1 DTTA criteria. Of these, 50.4% had very poorly controlled symptoms (Asthma Control Test ≤15), 36.2% were current smokers, and 85.4% had ≥1 additional chronic condition, most commonly anxiety/depression. More than twice as many participants with DTTA versus non-DTTA had ≥1 urgent general practitioner (GP) visit (61.4% vs. 27.5%, OR 4.8 [4.2-5.5, p < 0.0001]), or ≥1 emergency room visit (41.9% vs. 17.9%, OR 3.8 [3.3-4.4, p < 0.0001]) in the previous 12 months. CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the burden of uncontrolled symptoms, current smoking, multimorbidity and healthcare utilization in people with DTTA in the community, who may be under-represented in registries or clinical trials.

Association between pre-biologic T2-biomarker combinations and response to biologics in patients with severe asthma.

Background: To date, studies investigating the association between pre-biologic biomarker levels and post-biologic outcomes have been limited to single biomarkers and assessment of biologic efficacy from structured clinical trials. Aim: To elucidate the associations of pre-biologic individual biomarker levels or their combinations with pre-to-post biologic changes in asthma outcomes in real-life. Methods: This was a registry-based, cohort study using data from 23 countries, which shared data with the International Severe Asthma Registry (May 2017-February 2023). The investigated biomarkers (highest pre-biologic levels) were immunoglobulin E (IgE), blood eosinophil count (BEC) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Pre- to approximately 12-month post-biologic change for each of three asthma outcome domains (i.e. exacerbation rate, symptom control and lung function), and the association of this change with pre-biologic biomarkers was investigated for individual and combined biomarkers. Results: Overall, 3751 patients initiated biologics and were included in the analysis. No association was found between pre-biologic BEC and pre-to-post biologic change in exacerbation rate for any biologic class. However, higher pre-biologic BEC and FeNO were both associated with greater post-biologic improvement in FEV1 for both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R, with a trend for anti-IL4Rα. Mean FEV1 improved by 27-178 mL post-anti-IgE as pre-biologic BEC increased (250 to 1000 cells/µL), and by 43-216 mL and 129-250 mL post-anti-IL5/5R and -anti-IL4Rα, respectively along the same BEC gradient. Corresponding improvements along a FeNO gradient (25-100 ppb) were 41-274 mL, 69-207 mL and 148-224 mL for anti-IgE, anti-IL5/5R, and anti-IL4Rα, respectively. Higher baseline BEC was also associated with lower probability of uncontrolled asthma (OR 0.392; p=0.001) post-biologic for anti-IL5/5R. Pre-biologic IgE was a poor predictor of subsequent pre-to-post-biologic change for all outcomes assessed for all biologics. The combination of BEC + FeNO marginally improved the prediction of post-biologic FEV1 increase (adjusted R2: 0.751), compared to BEC (adjusted R2: 0.747) or FeNO alone (adjusted R2: 0.743) (p=0.005 and <0.001, respectively); however, this prediction was not improved by the addition of IgE. Conclusions: The ability of higher baseline BEC, FeNO and their combination to predict biologic-associated lung function improvement may encourage earlier intervention in patients with impaired lung function or at risk of accelerated lung function decline.

Investigation of LTF mRNA expression levels as an anti-T2 asthma biomarker.

BACKGROUND: Lactotransferrin (LTF) has an immunomodulatory function and its expression levels are associated with asthma susceptibility. OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate LTF mRNA expression levels in human bronchial epithelial cells (BECs) as an anti-type 2 (anti-T2) asthma biomarker. METHODS: Association analyses between LTF mRNA expression levels in BECs and asthma-related phenotypes were performed in the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP) cross-sectional (n = 155) and longitudinal (n = 156) cohorts using a generalized linear model. Correlation analyses of mRNA expression levels between LTF and all other genes were performed using Spearman correlation. RESULTS: Low LTF mRNA expression levels were associated with asthma susceptibility and severity (P < 0.025), retrospective and prospective asthma exacerbations, and low lung function (P < 8.3x10-3). Low LTF mRNA expression levels were associated with high airway T2 inflammation biomarkers (sputum eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide; P < 8.3x10-3) but not associated with blood eosinophils or total serum IgE. LTF mRNA expression levels were negatively correlated with expression levels of Th2 or asthma-associated genes (POSTN, NOS2, and MUC5AC) and eosinophil-related genes (IL1RL1, CCL26, and IKZF2) and positively correlated with expression levels of Th1 and inflammation genes (IL12A, MUC5B, and CC16) and Th17-driven cytokines or chemokines for neutrophils (CXCL1, CXCL6, and CSF3) (P < 3.5x10-6). CONCLUSIONS: Low LTF mRNA expression levels in BECs are associated with asthma susceptibility, severity, and exacerbations through upregulation of airway T2 inflammation. LTF is a potential anti-T2 biomarker and its expression levels may help determine the balance of eosinophilic and neutrophilic asthma.

[Effectiveness and safety of biological therapy in patients with severe asthma in a real clinical practice].

AIM: To assess effectiveness and safety of biological therapy in patients with severe asthma during 5 yr follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 129 adult outpatients (29% males) aged 18-81 yrs with severe asthma were followed up during 5 yrs and were examined for every 3-6 months. Eighty five patients were treated by conventional therapy (ICS/LABA ± tiotropium, montelukast, OCS) only and 44 pts additionally received biologicals (оmalizumab - 9 pts, мepolizumab - 8 pts, benralizumab - 11 pts, dupilumab - 16 pts). Pulmonary function tests were measured by dry spirometer (2120, Vitalograph Ltd., UK). Eosinophil count in blood was assessed by automatic haemoanalyser. Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide was measured by a chemiluminescence analyzer (LR4100; Logan Research, UK). Asthma control and quality of life were assessed by using Russian versions of ACQ-5 and SGRQ. RESULTS: The use of biologicals led to a more significant reduction of exacerbations and OCS use, improvement of lung function, asthma control and quality of life, decrease of eosinophil and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide than conventional therapy of severe asthma (p<0.05). Systemic side effects were not registered, frequency of local adverse reactions (edema, hyperemia and itching at injection site) was 14%. CONCLUSION: Long-term use of biologicals added to conventional therapy in patients with severe asthma is characterized by high effectiveness and favorable safety profile.

[Burden and management of severe asthma in Russia: results from international observational study].

AIM: To assess clinical and demographic characteristics of severe asthma (SA) patients and their management in Russian Federation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This publication provides data for Russian part of population of the international observational study. In Phase I, retrospective analysis of medical records of patients with SA was performed with assessment of clinical and demographic data, medical history, comorbidities, treatment approaches and healthcare utilization. Phase II was a cross-sectional collection of patient-reported outcomes: level of asthma control assessed by ACT (Asthma Control Test) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Phase I patients were enrolled into Phase II if they signed a written consent form. RESULTS: A total of 315 patients were included in Phase I of the study, 106 (33.6%) of them entered Phase II. Majority of study participants were either obese (n=103; 39.8%) or overweight (n=94; 36.3%). The most common comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases (n=217; 71.4%), followed by chronic respiratory diseases (n=198; 68.8%). There were 268 (85.1%) patients who had at least one exacerbation during last 12 months. Data for blood eosinophil count were available in 176 patients; 81.3% of them (n=143) had only one test in the last 12 months. The mean (SD) last available blood eosinophil count was 161.2 (181.2) cells/mm3. Serum Immunoglobulin E (IgE) value was known for 88 patients, and the mean (SD) last measured IgE value was 254.3 (249.7) ng/mL. Only 4.7% of Phase II participants had ACT scores indicative of controlled asthma (>20). As much as 74.5% had scores ≤15 suggesting uncontrolled disease. Most patients also had impaired HRQoL. CONCLUSION: Most SA patients had poor disease control with frequent exacerbations and high number of comorbidities. Blood eosinophils and IgE level measurements were not evaluated routinely which might be a barrier for appropriate phenotyping and treatment selection.

A novel syndrome of silent rhinovirus-associated bronchoalveolitis in children with recurrent wheeze.

BACKGROUND: Rhinovirus (RV) infections trigger wheeze episodes in children. Thus, understanding of the lung inflammatory response to RV in children with wheeze is important. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the associations of RV on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) granulocyte patterns and biomarkers of inflammation with age in children with treatment-refractory, recurrent wheeze (n = 616). METHODS: Children underwent BAL to examine viral nucleic acid sequences, bacterial cultures, granulocyte counts, and phlebotomy for both general and type-2 inflammatory markers. RESULTS: Despite the absence of cold symptoms, RV was the most common pathogen detected (30%), and when present, was accompanied by BAL granulocytosis in 75% of children. Compared to children with no BAL pathogens (n = 341), those with RV alone (n = 127) had greater (P < .05) isolated neutrophilia (43% vs 16%), mixed eosinophils and neutrophils (26% vs 11%), and less pauci-granulocytic (27% vs 61%) BAL. Children with RV alone furthermore had biomarkers of active infection with higher total blood neutrophils and serum C-reactive protein, but no differences in blood eosinophils or total IgE. With advancing age, the log odds of BAL RV alone were lower, 0.82 (5th-95th percentile CI: 0.76-0.88; P < .001), but higher, 1.58 (5th-95th percentile CI: 1.01-2.51; P = .04), with high-dose daily corticosteroid treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Children with severe recurrent wheeze often (22%) have a silent syndrome of lung RV infection with granulocytic bronchoalveolitis and elevated systemic markers of inflammation. The syndrome is less prevalent by school age and is not informed by markers of type-2 inflammation. The investigators speculate that dysregulated mucosal innate antiviral immunity is a responsible mechanism.

Clinical remission maintained and improved over time in patients with severe asthma treated with omalizumab.

BACKGROUND: Clinical remission has recently been proposed as a possible treatment goal even in severe asthma. In this real-world study, we aimed to assess the achievement rate and predictive factors of clinical remission using omalizumab in patients with severe asthma. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients with severe asthma initiated with omalizumab therapy and recruited from the asthma clinic of the Akdeniz University Hospital, Turkey. Clinical remission was defined as patients who received no oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy; showed no exacerbations; showed an asthma control questionnaire score of ≤ 1, asthma control test (ACT) of ≥ 20, or both and, FEV1 of ≥ 80% predicted. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were included in the study, with an average age of 56.4 ± 13.6 years. The mean duration of asthma was 23.5 ± 11.8 years and the mean duration of omalizumab treatment was 80.05 ± 35.04 months. Clinical remission rates were 25.9% in the first and second year, 34.0% in the third year, 34.1% in the fourth year and 47.4% in the fifth year. Pre-omalizumab ACT, FEV1 (%) and OCS use were significantly higher in patients with clinical remission at 1 year. Logistic regression analyses showed that none of the factors predicted clinical remission. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab has the potential to induce disease remission in a significant proportion of people with severe asthma, and this is maintained and improved over time.