Effects of light finger touch on the regularity of center-of-pressure fluctuations during quiet bipedal and single-leg postural tasks.

BACKGROUND: The use of extra sources of sensory information associated with light fingertip touch to enhance postural steadiness has been associated with increased attentional demands, whereas the regularity of center of pressure (COP) fluctuations has been interpreted as a marker of the amount of attention invested in posture control. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study addressed whether increased attentional demands associated with postural tasks involving light finger touch might be reflected by measures of COP regularity. METHODS: The experiments involved quiet bipedal stance (n = 8 participants) and single-legged stance (n = 14 participants). Each participant was instructed to stand as quietly as possible on a force plate, either touching an external rigid surface (applied force < 1 N, light touch condition), or not (no touch condition). Postural steadiness was assessed by traditional COP measurements (COP Area, RMS, and velocity), whereas the regularity of postural sway was based on estimates of the sample entropy (SaEn) of the COP time series. RESULTS: Traditional parameters of postural sway and COP regularity (inversely related to SaEn COP measurements) were reduced during the touch conditions as compared to the no-touch conditions, for both bipedal quiet stance and single-legged stance. Decreased COP regularity with light touch was mainly reflected in the direction of the largest postural sway (i.e. in the sagittal plane for bipedal stance and in the frontal plane for single-legged stance). SIGNIFICANCE: The present results suggest that actively touching an external surface with the fingertip, besides increasing postural steadiness, generated an externally oriented (presumably cognitive-dependent) focus of attention, so that participants invested less attention on the postural task per se (as suggested by increased SaEn), which might be associated with a more "automatic" control of posture.

Association Between Plantarflexion Torque Variability In Quiet Stance And During Force And Position Tasks.

This study examined the association between plantarflexion torque variability during quiet bipedal standing (QS) and during plantarflexion force- and position-matching tasks (FT and PT, respectively). In QS, participants stood still over a force plate, and the mean plantarflexion torque level exerted by each subject in QS (divided by 2 to give the torque due to a single leg) served as the target torque level for right leg FT and PT (performed with the participants seated with their right knee fully extended). During FT participants controlled the force level exerted by the foot against a rigid restraint, while during PT they controlled the angular position of the ankle when sustaining equivalent inertial loads. Standard deviation (SD) of plantarflexion torque was computed from torque signals acquired during periods with and without visual feedback. Significant correlations were found between plantarflexion torque variability in QS and FT (r = 0.8615, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.8838, p = 0.0003 for visual and no visual conditions, respectively) as well as between QS and PT (r = 0.8046, p = 0.003 and r = 0.7332, p = 0.0103 for visual and no visual conditions, respectively), regardless of vision availability. No significant differences were found between the correlations for Qs vs FT and QS vs PT (t(8) = 0.4778, p = 0.6455 and t(8) = 1.6819, p = 0.1310 for visual and no visual conditions, respectively), as assessed by "Hotelling-Williams" tests for equality among dependent correlations. The results indicate that simple measurements of plantarflexion torque fluctuations during FT and PT may be used to estimate balance ability. From a practical standpoint, it is suggested that rehabilitation protocols designed to regain/improve balance function may be based on the performance of FTs or PTs executed in a seated position.

The Brief Kinesthesia test is feasible and sensitive: a study in stroke

BACKGROUND: Clinicians lack a quantitative measure of kinesthetic sense, an important contributor to sensorimotor control of the hand and arm. OBJECTIVES: The objective here was to determine the feasibility of administering the Brief Kinesthesia Test (BKT) and begin to validate it by 1) reporting BKT scores from persons with chronic stroke and a healthy comparison group and 2) examining the relationship between the BKT scores and other valid sensory and motor measures. METHOD: Adults with stroke and mild to moderate hemiparesis (N=12) and an age-, gender-, and handedness-matched healthy comparison group (N=12) completed the BKT by reproducing three targeted reaching movements per hand with vision occluded. OTHER MEASURES: the Hand Active Sensation Test (HASTe), Touch-Test(tm) monofilament aesthesiometer, 6-item Wolf Motor Function Test (Wolf), the Motor Activity Log (MAL), and the Box and Blocks Test (BBT). A paired t-test compared BKT scores between groups. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients assessed the relationship between BKT scores and other measures. RESULTS: Post-stroke participants performed more poorly on the BKT than comparison participants with their contralesional and ipsilesional upper extremity. The mean difference for the contralesional upper extremity was 3.7 cm (SE=1.1, t=3.34; p<0.008). The BKT score for the contralesional limb was strongly correlated with the MAL-how much (r=0.84, p=0.001), the MAL-how well (r=0.76, p=0.007), Wolf (r=0.69, p=0.02), and the BBT (r=0.77, p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The BKT was feasible to administer and sensitive to differences in reaching accuracy between persons with stroke and a comparison group. With further refinement, The BKT may become a valuable clinical measure of post-stroke kinesthetic impairment.