Synergistic effects of sulopenem in combination with cefuroxime or durlobactam against Mycobacterium abscessus.

Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab) affects patients with immunosuppression or underlying structural lung diseases such as cystic fibrosis (CF). Additionally, Mab poses clinical challenges due to its resistance to multiple antibiotics. Herein, we investigated the synergistic effect of dual ß-lactams [sulopenem and cefuroxime (CXM)] or the combination of sulopenem and CXM with ß-lactamase inhibitors [BLIs-avibactam (AVI) or durlobactam (DUR)]. The sulopenem-CXM combination yielded low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for 54 clinical Mab isolates and ATCC19977 (MIC50 and MIC90 ≤0.25 µg/mL). Similar synergistic effects were observed in time-kill studies conducted at concentrations achievable in clinical settings. Sulopenem-CXM outperformed monotherapy, yielding ~1.5 Log10 CFU/mL reduction during 10 days. Addition of BLIs enhanced this antibacterial effect, resulting in an additional reduction of CFUs (~3 Log10 for sulopenem-CXM and AVI and ~4 Log10 for sulopenem-DUR). Exploration of the potential mechanisms of the synergy focused on their interactions with L,D-transpeptidases (Ldts; LdtMab1-LdtMab4), penicillin-binding-protein B (PBP B), and D,D-carboxypeptidase (DDC). Acyl complexes, identified via mass spectrometry analysis, demonstrated the binding of sulopenem with LdtMab2-LdtMab4, DDC, and PBP B and CXM with LdtMab2 and PBP B. Molecular docking and mass spectrometry data suggest the formation of a covalent adduct between sulopenem and LdtMab2 after the nucleophilic attack of the cysteine residue at the ß-lactam carbonyl carbon, leading to the cleavage of the ß-lactam ring and the establishment of a thioester bond linking the LdtMab2 with sulopenem. In conclusion, we demonstrated the biochemical basis of the synergy of sulopenem-CXM with or without BLIs. These findings potentially broaden the selection of oral therapeutic agents to combat Mab. IMPORTANCE: Treating infections from Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab), particularly those resistant to common antibiotics like macrolides, is notoriously difficult, akin to a never-ending struggle for healthcare providers. The rate of treatment failure is even higher than that seen with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The role of combination ß-lactams in inhibiting L,D-transpeptidation, the major peptidoglycan crosslink reaction in Mab, is an area of intense investigation, and clinicians have utilized this approach in the treatment of macrolide-resistant Mab, with reports showing clinical success. In our study, we found that cefuroxime and sulopenem, when used together, display a significant synergistic effect. If this promising result seen in lab settings, translates well into real-world clinical effectiveness, it could revolutionize current treatment methods. This combination could either replace the need for more complex intravenous medications or serve as a "step down" to an oral medication regimen. Such a shift would be much easier for patients to manage, enhancing their comfort and likelihood of sticking to the treatment plan, which could lead to better outcomes in tackling these tough infections. Our research delved into how these drugs inhibit cell wall synthesis, examined time-kill data and binding studies, and provided a scientific basis for the observed synergy in cell-based assays.

A pairwise approach to revitalize ß-lactams for the treatment of TB.

The dual ß-lactam approach has been successfully applied to overcome target redundancy in nontuberculous mycobacteria. Surprisingly, this approach has not been leveraged for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, despite the high conservation of peptidoglycan synthesis. Through a comprehensive screen of oral ß-lactam pairs, we have discovered that cefuroxime strongly potentiates the bactericidal activity of tebipenem and sulopenem-advanced clinical candidates-and amoxicillin, at concentrations achieved clinically. ß-lactam pairs thus have the potential to reduce TB treatment duration.

Oral ß-Lactam Pairs for the Treatment of Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease.

Cure rates for pulmonary disease caused by the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) are poor. While ß-lactam are front line antibiotics against Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease, they have not been used or recommended to treat MAC lung infections. Through a comprehensive screen of oral ß-lactams, we have discovered that selected pairs combining either a penem/carbapenem or penicillin with a cephalosporin are strongly bactericidal at clinically achieved concentrations. These dual ß-lactam combinations include tebipenem and sulopenem, both in phase 3, and Food and Drug Administration-approved amoxicillin and cefuroxime. They could therefore immediately enter clinical trials or clinical practice.

Impact of acquired broad-spectrum ß-lactamases on susceptibility to oral penems/carbapenems (tebipenem, sulopenem, and faropenem) alone or in combination with avibactam and taniborbactam ß-lactamase inhibitors in Escherichia coli.

The impact of ß-lactamases on susceptibility to oral penems/carbapenems (tebipenem, sulopenem, and faropenem) and other carbapenem molecules was evaluated in Escherichia coli, alone and in combination with avibactam or taniborbactam ß-lactamase inhibitors. Tebipenem and sulopenem exhibited a similar spectrum of activity compared to the intravenous carbapenems and displayed lower MIC values than ceftibuten-avibactam against E. coli producing extended-spectrum ß-lactamases or AmpC enzymes. Combined with taniborbactam, tebipenem and sulopenem exhibited low MIC values against almost all tested recombinant E. coli, including metallo-ß-lactamase producers.

Sulopenem Disk Development, Quality Control Range, and MIC to Disk Result Correlation for Enterobacterales Isolates.

Sulopenem disk masses of 2, 5, 10, and 20 µg were evaluated by susceptibility testing isolates by broth microdilution and disk diffusion. A 2-µg disk was chosen, and error-rate bounding analysis in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline M23 was conducted using a proposed sulopenem susceptible/intermediate/resistant (S/I/R) interpretive criterion of ≤0.5/1/≥2 µg/mL. Among the evaluated Enterobacterales (n = 2,856), very few interpretive errors were observed (no very major errors and only one major error). An eight-laboratory quality control (QC) study was performed using the 2-µg disk, and 99.0% (470/475) of results were within a 7-mm range of 24 to 30 mm. Results were similar by disk lot and media, and no outlier sites were observed. A sulopenem 2-µg disk QC range for Escherichia coli 29522 of 24 to 30 mm was established by the CLSI. A 2-µg sulopenem disk performs accurately and reproducibly for testing of Enterobacterales.

Sulopenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Including Pyelonephritis: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Sulopenem is a thiopenem antibiotic being developed for the treatment of multidrug-resistant infections. The availability of both intravenous (IV) and oral formulations will facilitate earlier hospital discharge. METHODS: Hospitalized adults with pyuria, bacteriuria, and signs and symptoms of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) were randomized to 5 days of IV sulopenem followed by oral sulopenem etzadroxil/probenecid or 5 days of IV ertapenem followed by oral ciprofloxacin or amoxicillin-clavulanate, depending on uropathogen susceptibility. The primary end point was overall combined clinical and microbiologic response at the test-of-cure visit (day 21). RESULTS: Of 1392 treated patients, 444 and 440 treated with sulopenem and ertapenem, respectively, had a positive baseline urine culture and were eligible for the primary efficacy analyses. Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing organisms were identified in 26.6% of patients and fluoroquinolone-nonsusceptible pathogens in 38.6%. For the primary end point, noninferiority of sulopenem to the comparator regimen was not demonstrated, 67.8% vs 73.9% (difference, -6.1%; 95% confidence interval, -12.0 to -.1%). The difference was driven by a lower rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in the subgroup of ertapenem-treated patients who stepped down to ciprofloxacin. No substantial difference in overall response was observed at any other time point. Both IV and oral formulations of sulopenem were well-tolerated and compared favorably to the comparator. CONCLUSIONS: Sulopenem followed by oral sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid was not noninferior to ertapenem followed by oral step-down therapy for the treatment of cUTIs, driven by a lower rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in those who received ciprofloxacin. Both formulations of sulopenem were well-tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03357614.

Sulopenem or Ciprofloxacin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: There are limited treatment options for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) caused by resistant pathogens. Sulopenem etzadroxil/probenecid (sulopenem) is an oral thiopenem antibiotic active against multidrug-resistant pathogens that cause uUTIs. METHODS: Patients with uUTI were randomized to 5 days of sulopenem or 3 days of ciprofloxacin. The primary endpoint was overall success, defined as both clinical and microbiologic response at day 12. In patients with ciprofloxacin-nonsusceptible baseline pathogens, sulopenem was compared for superiority over ciprofloxacin; in patients with ciprofloxacin-susceptible pathogens, the agents were compared for noninferiority. Using prespecified hierarchical statistical testing, the primary endpoint was tested in the combined population if either superiority or noninferiority was declared in the nonsusceptible or susceptible population, respectively. RESULTS: In the nonsusceptible population, sulopenem was superior to ciprofloxacin, 62.6% vs 36.0% (difference, 26.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15.1 to 7.4; P <.001). In the susceptible population, sulopenem was not noninferior to ciprofloxacin, 66.8% vs 78.6% (difference, -11.8%; 95% CI, -18.0 to 5.6). The difference was driven by a higher rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) post-treatment in patients on sulopenem. In the combined analysis, sulopenem was noninferior to ciprofloxacin, 65.6% vs 67.9% (difference, -2.3%; 95% CI, -7.9 to 3.3). Diarrhea occurred more frequently with sulopenem (12.4% vs 2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Sulopenem was noninferior to ciprofloxacin in the treatment of uUTIs. Sulopenem was superior to ciprofloxacin in patients with uUTIs due to ciprofloxacin-nonsusceptible pathogens. Sulopenem was not noninferior in patients with ciprofloxacin-susceptible pathogens, driven largely by a lower rate of ASB in those who received ciprofloxacin. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03354598.

Strongly Bactericidal All-Oral ß-Lactam Combinations for the Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus Lung Disease.

Bioactive forms of oral ß-lactams were screened in vitro against Mycobacterium abscessus with and without the bioactive form of the oral ß-lactamase inhibitor avibactam ARX1796. Sulopenem was equally active without avibactam, while tebipenem, cefuroxime, and amoxicillin required avibactam for optimal activity. Systematic pairwise combination of the four ß-lactams revealed strong bactericidal synergy for each of sulopenem, tebipenem, and cefuroxime combined with amoxicillin in the presence of avibactam. These all-oral ß-lactam combinations warrant clinical evaluation.

Oral Antibiotics in Clinical Development for Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections.

The treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) has been complicated by the emergence of multidrug-resistant, ß-lactamase-expressing pathogens. As a result of the limited treatment options, patients often require hospitalization and intravenous therapy. In essence, a strong unmet need for oral antibiotics, active against extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) uropathogens has emerged. Oral carbapenems (tebipenem and sulopenem) and oral cephalosporin/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations are in various stages of clinical development for the treatment of uncomplicated and complicated UTI. Tebipenem, if approved, will be the first oral treatment for complicated UTI while sulopenem will be for uncomplicated UTI. The ß-lactamase inhibitors ETX0282, VNRX7145, ARX1796, and QPX7728 are combined with cefpodoxime proxetil or ceftibuten that achieve favorable exposures in urine compared to other uropathogen-active oral cephalosporins. The combination ceftibuten-QPX7728 has potential broad-spectrum coverage against carbapenemase producers including metallo ß-lactamase producers. Other novel combinations, namely cefpodoxime/ETX0282, ceftibuten/VNRX-7145, and ceftibuten/ARX1796, have also demonstrated excellent activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapanemase (KPC) and OXA-48-like producers. All these agents, upon their arrival for commercial use, would strengthen the outpatient therapy.

In Vitro Activity of Sulopenem, an Oral Penem, against Urinary Isolates of Escherichia coli.

The in vitro activity of sulopenem was assessed against a collection from 2014 to 2016 of 539 urinary isolates of Escherichia coli from Canadian patients by using CLSI-defined broth microdilution methodology. A concentration of sulopenem 0.03 µg/ml inhibited both 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of isolates tested; sulopenem MICs ranged from 0.015 to 0.25 µg/ml. The in vitro activity of sulopenem was unaffected by nonsusceptibility to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and/or ciprofloxacin, multidrug-resistant phenotypes, extended-spectrum ß-lactamases, or AmpC ß-lactamases.