RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This updated version of a systematic review (SR) originally published in 2009 evaluated the effect of smoking on the clinical outcomes achieved with root coverage (RC) procedures in the treatment of gingival recession (GR) defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This SR includes randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and case series with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Eligible studies involved GR defects without interproximal tissue loss submitted to RC procedures, as well as outcome measures from smokers (i.e., those smoking 10 or more cigarettes per day at baseline) and nonsmokers, recorded separately. Three electronic databases were searched up to March 31, 2024. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted thoroughly. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies reporting on 181 smokers and 162 nonsmokers, submitted to different RC procedures, were included. Half of these trials were originally included in the 2009 SR, whereas the other half (six studies) were included in this update. Nonsmokers experienced greater reductions in GR and gains in clinical attachment level compared to smokers. Pooled estimates comparing smokers and nonsmokers who received coronally advanced flap (CAF) alone and subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) + CAF showed that nonsmokers achieved greater mean root coverage (MRC) in both treatments. Significant differences in MRC of 10.85% (95% CI, 1.92 to 19.77) and 22.04 (95% CI, 14.25 to 29.83), favoring nonsmokers, were identified for CAF and SCTG + CAF, respectively. Similarly, nonsmokers treated with SCTG + CAF displayed superior number of sites exhibiting complete root coverage (CRF) when compared with smokers (risk ratio, 4.12; 95% CI, 1.73 to 9.80). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking negatively impacts the outcomes of RC procedures, particularly those achieved by SCTG-based procedures. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Smoking was linked to poorer RC outcomes. These outcomes highlight the critical need to integrate smoking cessation into periodontal treatment plans.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was two-fold: (i) to evaluate the long-term (≥5 years) stability of the gingival margin position, keratinized tissue width (KTW) and gingival thickness (GT) in sites that underwent root coverage (RC) or gingival augmentation (GA); and (ii) to assess the influence of different local variables on the long-term stability of dental and gingival tissues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs reporting short-term (i.e., 6-12 months after baseline surgical intervention) and long-term (≥5 years) follow-up data after surgical treatment of adult patients presenting single or multiple mucogingival deformities, defined as sites presenting gingival recession defects (GRDs) and/or (KTW) deficiency (i.e., <2 mm), were considered eligible for inclusion. MEDLINE-PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for articles published up to 15 May 2023. Mixed-effects multiple linear regression was used to assess the association between KTW, type of surgical procedure and time (i.e., independent variables) on the stability of the gingival margin in sites that received RC or GA therapy. RESULTS: Of the 2569 potentially eligible records, 41 (reporting 40 studies) met the eligibility criteria. Graphical estimates including data from all RC procedures found an upward trend in recession depth (RD) increase over time. Conversely, it was observed that in 63.63% of RC studies and in 59.32% of RC treatment arms KTW increased over time, particularly in sites treated with subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTGs). Conversely, sites that underwent GA procedures generally exhibited an overall reduction of KTW over time. However, sites treated with free gingival grafts (FGGs) showed a decrease in RD after 10 years of follow-up. Three main findings derived from the pooled estimates were identified: (i) Gingival margin stability was associated with the amount of KTW present during short-term assessment (i.e. the greater the KTW at 6-12 months after treatment, the more stable the gingival margin). (ii) The use of autogenous soft-tissue grafts was associated with lower RD increase over time. (iii) Treatment approaches that contribute to the three-dimensional enhancement of the gingival phenotype, as clearly demonstrated by FGG, were associated with gingival margin stability. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of apical migration of the gingival margin appears to be directly related to the amount of KTW and GT upon tissue maturation. Interventions involving the use of autogenous grafts, either SCTG or FGG, are associated with greater short-term KTW gain and lower RD increase over time.
Assuntos
Gengiva , Regeneração Tecidual Guiada Periodontal , Adulto , Humanos , Tecido Conjuntivo/transplante , Gengiva/cirurgia , Retração Gengival/cirurgia , Regeneração Tecidual Guiada Periodontal/métodos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/cirurgia , Raiz Dentária/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: There are few studies comparing xenogeneic acellular dermal matrixes (XDMs) with connective tissue graft (CTG) to treat single gingival recession (GR). The present study involved a reanalysis of previous studies and comparison of CTG or XDM to treat single RT1/GR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients from three previous randomized clinical trials treated either by CTG (n = 25) or XDM (n = 25) were evaluated after 6-month. Clinical, patient-centered, and esthetic parameters were assessed. Pearson's correlation and regression analyses were also performed. RESULTS: Greater recession reduction (RecRed), percentage of root coverage (%RC), and complete root coverage (CRC) were observed in the CTG group (p ≤ 0.02). Gingival thickness (GT) and keratinized tissue width (KTW) gains were higher in the CTG group. The CTG group showed better esthetic at 6-month. Logistic analyses reported that GT([OR] = 1.6473 ) and papilla height (PH) (OR = 8.20) are predictors of CRC. GT*XDM interaction was a negative predictor of CRC (OR = 7.105-5 ). GT at baseline acted as a predictor of RecRed in both groups (p = 0.03). The XDM graft impacted RecRed and %RC negatively. Baseline PH was a predictor of %RC for both grafts. CONCLUSION: CTG was superior for treating RT1/GR, providing better root coverage outcomes and tissue gains over time. GT, PH, and graft type were classified as predictors of CRC. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: CTG presented better outcomes to treat single RT1 gingival recession when compared to the XDM.
Assuntos
Derme Acelular , Retração Gengival , Humanos , Retração Gengival/cirurgia , Raiz Dentária , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Tecido Conjuntivo/transplante , GengivaRESUMO
Introducción: Las recesiones gingivales son afecciones de las encías, que son muy frecuentes y podrían provocar repercusiones estéticas, hipersensibilidad dentinaria y tener más tendencia a la formación de lesiones cervicales. Es necesario recubrir la superficie radicular mediante técnicas regenerativas periodontales. Objetivo: Comparar la cantidad de recubrimiento radicular, la profundidad al sondaje y el nivel de inserción clínica, empleando las técnicas de colgajo de reposición coronal, con y sin injerto de tejido conectivo, en pacientes con recesiones gingivales Miller I y II. Métodos: Se incluyeron un total de 16 pacientes con recesiones gingivales Miller clase I y II, de los cuales se seleccionaron 50 piezas dentarias tratadas quirúrgicamente para cubrir las recesiones. Se utilizaron las técnicas de colgajo de reposición coronal, con y sin injerto de tejido conectivo. Las mediciones clínicas fueron comparadas al inicio y a los tres meses posoperatorios. Resultados: Al tercer mes poscirugía los resultados del recubrimiento radicular, profundidad al sondaje y el nivel de inserción clínica para la técnica colgajo de reposición coronal con injerto de tejido conectivo, fueron 0,96 ± 1,33; 0,87 ± 0,63; 1,83 ± 1,7 y para la técnica colgajo de reposición coronal fueron 1,44 ± 1,19; 1,04 ± 0,52; 2,48 ± 1,48, respectivamente. Al comparar el recubrimiento radicular intergrupo no se encontraron diferencias significativas (p = 0,11). Sin embargo, al comparar la profundidad al sondaje intergrupo (p = 0,04), el nivel de inserción clínica intergrupo (p = 0,001) y todas las mediciones clínicas intragrupo (p = 0,001), se encontraron diferencias significativas. Conclusiones: La técnica de colgajo de reposición coronal, con y sin injerto de tejido conectivo, demostró diferencias significativas en la profundidad al sondaje y el nivel de inserción clínica en recesiones gingivales Miller I y II. No se alcanzaron diferencias significativas para el recubrimiento radicular en ambas técnicas a los 3 meses de seguimiento(AU)
Introduction: Gingival recession is a very common gum condition which may result in aesthetic alterations and dentin hypersensitivity, and increase the probability of cervical lesions. It is necessary to cover the root surface using periodontal regeneration techniques. Objective: Compare the amount of root coverage, probing depth and clinical insertion level, using coronally repositioned flap techniques with and without connective tissue graft in patients with Miller I and II gingival recessions. Methods: A total 16 patients with Miller class I and II gingival recessions were included in the study, from whom 50 teeth were selected which had been treated surgically to cover the recessions. The techniques used were coronally repositioned flap with and without connective tissue graft. Clinical measurements were compared at the start of the postoperative period and three months later. Results: Three months after surgery, root coverage, probing depth and clinical insertion level were 0.96 ± 1.33; 0.87 ± 0.63; 1.83 ± 1.7, respectively, for coronally repositioned flap with connective tissue graft, and 1.44 ± 1.19; 1.04 ± 0.52; 2.48 ± 1.48, respectively, for coronally repositioned flap. Root coverage intergroup comparison did not find any significant differences (p = 0.11). However, intergroup comparison of probing depth (p = 0.04) and clinical insertion level (p = 0.001), and all the intragroup clinical measurements (p = 0.001) did find significant differences. Conclusions: Coronally repositioned flap technique with and without connective tissue graft showed significant differences in terms of probing depth and clinical insertion level in Miller I and II gingival recessions. At three months' follow-up, no root coverage significant differences were observed for either technique(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Tecido Conjuntivo , Retração Gengival/terapia , Transplante de Tecidos , Sensibilidade da DentinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Xenogeneic matrices (XMs) have been increasingly used for root coverage procedures. This study compared the use of two types of XM (collagen matrix [CM] and xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix [XDM]) associated with the coronally advanced flap technique (CAF) to treat single gingival recessions. METHODS: Seventy-five patients presenting single RT1 gingival recession were treated by CAF (control group, n = 25), CAF+CM (test group 1, n = 25), or CAF+XDM (test group 2, n = 25) and completed 6-month follow-up. Clinical, patient-centered, and esthetic assessments were performed and intra- and intergroup differences were analyzed. RESULTS: At 6 months, the mean recession reduction for CAF, CAF+CM, and CAF+XDM was 2.4 ± 0.8 mm, 2.4 ± 0.9 mm and 2.1 ± 0.8 mm, respectively (P > 0.05). The corresponding mean percentage of root coverage was 78.9% ± 26.2% for CAF, 78.0% ± 28.5% for CAF+CM, and 65.6% ± 26.9% for CAF+XDM (P > 0.05). Dentin hypersensitivity and esthetic conditions showed significantly improvements in all groups. Test groups presented significant gains in gingival thickness (GT; CAF+CM: 0.4 ± 0.3 mm; CAF+XDM: 0.4 ± 0.2 mm) compared to the control group (CAF: 0.0 ± 0.1 mm; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The CAF, CAF+CM, and CAF+XDM treatments each provided similar results in the treatment of single gingival recessions. The addition of either CM or XDM to CAF increases the GT.
Assuntos
Retração Gengival , Colágeno/uso terapêutico , Tecido Conjuntivo , Estética Dentária , Gengiva/cirurgia , Retração Gengival/tratamento farmacológico , Retração Gengival/cirurgia , Humanos , Raiz Dentária/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the deviation of the implant position after placement in single maxillary incisor post-extraction sockets between fully and partially guided surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with a failing maxillary incisor were randomly allocated into two groups: the partially guided surgery (PGS, n = 12) group or fully guided surgery (FGS, n = 12) group. Clinical analyses, intra-oral scans, and computed tomography scans (CT) were initially performed to define the virtual positioning of the implants and fabrication of the 3D printed surgical guides. A narrow, 3.5 × 16 mm implant was placed in each socket. In this moment, the insertion torque (IT) was assessed and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed. All patients received an immediate provisional without occlusal contacts. Another CT scan was performed after the procedures to compare the implant position with the virtually planned position. RESULTS: Significant deviations occurred at the implant apex, according to the global and facial-palatal analyses, in comparison to its cervical position. The PGS group also presented a larger deviation in the MD position. No statistical differences between the groups were detected, however, there was a tendency of lower angular deviation in the PGS group. CONCLUSIONS: While there was a slight deviation from the virtually planned position of the implant to the actual position and a tendency of lower angular deviation in the PGS group, there was no difference among groups regarding its position and primary stability. (UNT: 1111-1214-2812 - http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-4tmcrk/).
Assuntos
Implantes Dentários , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador , Implantação Dentária Endóssea , Humanos , Incisivo , Maxila/diagnóstico por imagem , Maxila/cirurgia , Alvéolo Dental/diagnóstico por imagem , Alvéolo Dental/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this case series is to present a technique to harvest palatal connective tissue grafts (CTGs) that concurrently provides several advantages over previously described techniques when applied to treat gingival recessions. CASE SERIES: Twenty patients were treated with root coverage procedures using CTGs harvested with the modified double blade harvesting technique (MDBHT). A double blade knife with two surgical blades set 1 mm apart was used in this case series. The palatal connective tissue was accessed through a horizontal incision and an envelope flap that was closed by primary intention. The grafts were measured immediately after harvesting with a periodontal probe. The overall mean length was 28.8 ± 7.8 mm and graft thickness was homogeneous and near to 1 mm in all the cases. Graft mean apicocoronal height was 5.0 ± 0.8 mm and 5.3 ± 1 mm at the molar and premolar levels, respectively. Clinical wound healing was evaluated at 7 days post-surgically and showed a modified early-wound healing index mean value of 3.0 ± 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: The introduced MDBHT consistently rendered grafts of uniform thickness and sufficient dimensions, while excluding epithelial tissue and the deeper aspects of the submucosa, thus avoiding rich fatty and glandular tissues. MDBHT allowed for donor site healing with minimal discomfort and without complications.
Assuntos
Retração Gengival , Tecido Conjuntivo/cirurgia , Humanos , Palato , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Instrumentos CirúrgicosRESUMO
RESUMEN Introducción: La recesión periodontal es un problema mucogingival frecuente, de origen multifactorial que usualmente se asocia a hipersensibilidad dentinaria, caries radicular y problemas estéticos. La cobertura radicular es parte integral de su tratamiento quirúrgico. Las técnicas bilaminares con injerto de tejido conectivo subepitelial son las más predecibles. Objetivo: Describir los resultados clínicos obtenidos al realizar en recesiones periodontales múltiples, injerto de tejido conectivo subepitelial cubierto por colgajo reposicionado coronal modificado. Presentación del caso: Paciente masculino, blanco, obrero, de 43 años, con antecedentes personales y familiares de salud que acudió al Servicio de Periodoncia de la Clínica Estomatológica "III Congreso del PCC", Matanzas, Cuba, por "cambio de posición de la encía en algunos dientes". Clínicamente existía exposición radicular en los dientes 13, 53 y 14, ausencia del 12, higiene bucal adecuada, no presencia de bolsas periodontales. Se diagnosticó recesión periodontal clase I de Miller localizada en dichos dientes. Para su tratamiento quirúrgico se realizó injerto de tejido conectivo subepitelial y colgajo desplazado coronal sin incisiones verticales de 11 a 15. A la semana, se retiró sutura de zona donante, se observó buena cicatrización. Se citó a los siete días para retirar cemento quirúrgico y sutura de la zona injertada; existía discreto edema, materia alba, biopelícula y cobertura radicular completa del 13, 53 y 14. Al año del procedimiento, las superficies expuestas estaban completamente cubiertas con tejido gingival posicionado en 13 y 53, ganancia de encía insertada y armonía de color entre sitio injertado y área adyacente. El 14 mostró 1 mm de raíz expuesta. Conclusiones: La técnica empleada, cubrió totalmente la superficie radicular del 13, del 53 y parcialmente la raíz del 14. Se obtuvo incremento de encía queratinizada, óptimo aspecto estético y buena evolución posoperatoria(AU)
ABSTRACT Introduction: periodontal recession is a frequent mucogingival problem, of multifactorial origin that is usually associated to dentin hypersensibility, radicular caries and esthetic problems. Root coverage is an integral part of its surgical treatment, considering bilaminar techniques with subepithelial connective tissue graft as the most predictable ones. Objective: to describe the clinical results obtained when making a sub epithelial connective tissue graft covered by a modified coronal repositioned flap, in multiple periodontal recessions. Case presentation: a male, white, worker patient, aged 43 years, with health personal and family antecedents, who assisted the Periodontics service of the Dental Clinic "III Congreso del Partido", of Matanzas, Cuba, for "a change of the gum position in some teeth". Clinically, there it was a root exposition of the 13, 53 and 14 teeth, lack of the 12 one, adequate oral hygiene and absence of periodontal´s pockets. A Miller´s Class I periodontal recession located in those teeth was diagnosed. A subepithelial connective tissue graft and coronally advanced flap was performed without vertical incisions from 11 to 15 teeth. After a week, the suture of the donor zone was retired, showing good healing. He was cited at the seventh day to retire surgical cement and suture form the grafted zone, observing a discrete edema, debris, biofilm and complete root coverage of the 13, 53 and 14 teeth. At the year after the procedure, the exposed surface was completely covered with gingival tissue positioned in the 13 and 53 teeth, with a gaining of inserted gum and color harmony between the grafted site and adjacent areas. The 14 tooth showed 1 mm of exposed root. Conclusions: the used technique totally covered the root of the 13 and the 53, and most of the root of the 14 tooth, reaching an increase of the keratinized gum, and optimal esthetic aspect and post-surgery evolution(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/cirurgia , Transplante de Tecidos/efeitos adversos , Retração Gengival/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Gingival recession (GR) is one of the most common esthetic concerns for patients, and several surgical procedures have been developed for its treatment. It has been widely demonstrated that root coverage of shallow Miller class I and II areas of gingival recession is generally predictable, but the treatment of deep recessions associated with lack of attached keratinized tissue remains a challenge even for skilled surgeons. Although this type of recessions can be treated with tunneling procedures, because of their size, covering the connective tissue grafts (CTGs) with displaced flaps provide better graft nutrition and improve the outcome. The purpose of this case series is to present an alternative treatment to the traditional laterally displaced flap and tunneling techniques used for deep narrow recessions: The "laterally stretched flap" (LSF) with CTG. CASE PRESENTATION: Five healthy patients with isolated Miller Class II narrow deep gingival recessions were included in the case series. All the defects were treated with LSF and CTG. Complete root coverage (CRC) was achieved in 80% of the cases (4/5). Keratinized tissue increase was obtained in all the cases. The follow-up was between one and three years. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this case series, LSF + CTG demonstrated to be a promising technique for the treatment of narrow deep recessions. The lack of vertical incisions and an envelope approach renders a more stable wound with minimal scar formation and patient discomfort.
Assuntos
Tecido Conjuntivo , Retração Gengival , Incisivo , Tecido Conjuntivo/transplante , Estética Dentária , Retração Gengival/cirurgia , Humanos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This case report presents the successful multidisciplinary treatment of a maxillary lateral incisor with a deep and narrow recession involving the root apex associated with pulpal necrosis. The tooth initially considered with a hopeless prognosis, was treated with a combined periodontal plastic, regenerative, and endodontic surgical procedure. CASE PRESENTATION: A recently reported technique, the laterally stretched (LAST) flap with a connective tissue graft (CTG) technique for root coverage, was combined with enamel matrix derivative (EMD) for periodontal regeneration of the periapical lesion, that complemented an apicoectomy with retrograde sealing. The 6-year follow-up evidenced root coverage (RC) of 91.6% and increased keratinized tissue. Clinical and radiographic evaluation showed resolution of the periapical process. CONCLUSIONS: A severe gingival recession with endodontic involvement can be repaired if adequate control of the endodontic infection is obtained. The LAST flap, originally described for lower anterior teeth, was used successfully in a maxillary tooth, under extreme circumstances.
Assuntos
Tecido Conjuntivo , Proteínas do Esmalte Dentário , Retração Gengival , Gengivoplastia , Tecido Conjuntivo/transplante , Retração Gengival/cirurgia , Humanos , PlásticosRESUMO
A diminuição do tempo de tratamento com implantes osseointegrados, assim como a redução da complexidade do plano de tratamento e a otimização de protocolos minimamente invasivos, é um dos aspectos atuais em reabilitações com implantes. A instalação imediata de implantes em sítios pós-exodontia tem sido relatada na literatura como uma técnica previsível, permitindo a redução do tempo e do número de procedimentos para reabilitação protética. Este artigo relatou um caso clínico de reabilitação de um incisivo central superior perdido por reabsorção radicular, em que foi instalado um implante com confecção imediata de uma prótese temporária. No intuito de minimizar as alterações volumétricas inerentes ao processo de exodontia, além da utilização de um substituto ósseo entre a tábua óssea alveolar e o implante, foi utilizado enxerto de tecido conjuntivo removido do palato. A técnica possibilitou uma reabilitação estética e funcional adequada, e redução no tempo de tratamento com mínimo trauma ao paciente.
Decreasing treatment time with dental implants, as well as reducing the complexity of the treatment plan and optimize minimally invasive protocols, are current issues in rehabilitation with implants. Immediate implant placement in post-extraction sites have been reported in the literature as a predictable technique allowing to reduce the time and number of procedures for prosthetic rehabilitation. This is a case report of an upper central incisor lost due to root resorption, receiving an immediate implant and construction of a temporary prosthesis. In order to minimize volumetric changes inherent in the extraction process, besides the use of a bone substitute between alveolar bone plate and the implant, it was used connective tissue graft removed from the palate. The technique allowed an aesthetic and functional rehabilitation and appropriate reduction in treatment time with minimal tissue trauma.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Tecido Conjuntivo/transplante , Implantes Dentários para Um Único Dente , Estética Dentária , Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário/métodos , Cirurgia Bucal/instrumentação , Transplante de Tecidos/métodosRESUMO
La reconstrucción de la estética gingival (rosada) es un tema importante en la odontología implanto-soportada moderna, y cualquier resultado estético comprometido se considera un fracaso. En la literatura se proponen variados enfoques quirúrgicos y no quirúrgicos para reconstruir la papila interdental perdida. En esta técnica modificada, el extremo distal del injerto pediculado fue dividido en dos partes creando una estructura bífida, que luego se colocó alrededor del pilar y suturó por vestibular. Esta técnica dio como resultado un aumento significativo de volumen de la papila en las direcciones coronaria y vestibular. El injerto de tejido conectivo pediculado subepitelial asociado con un colgajo coronalmente desplazado parece ser un abordaje viable para el tratamiento de la papila ausente, asociado con restauraciones implanto-soportadas.
Rebuilding the pink esthetic is an important issue in modern esthetic implant dentistry, and any compromised esthetic results following implant-supported restorations are considered failures. Several surgical and nonsurgical approaches are proposed in the literature to reconstruct the lost interdental papilla. In this modified technique the distal end of the pedicle graft was divided into two parts creating a bifid, which were then placed around the abutment and sutured on the facial aspect. This technique resulted in a significant gain of papillary volume in both coronal and facial directions. The subepithelial connective pedicle graft associated with a coronally advanced flap seems to be a viable approach for the treatment of missing papilla associated with implant-supported restorations.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Gengiva/transplante , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Tecido Conjuntivo/transplante , Gengivoplastia/métodos , Retração Gengival/cirurgia , Retração Gengival/patologiaRESUMO
A doença periodontal é uma doença inflamatória crônica que resulta na destruição dos tecidos de suporte com consequente perda dental. A substituição dos dentes perdidos por restaurações implantossuportadas tem demonstrado ser um método de tratamento altamente previsível com bom prognóstico em longo prazo. Contudo, algumas sequelas da perda dentária inviabilizam a instalação de implantes osseointegrados em posição ideal, sendo, neste caso, necessários procedimentos regenerativos para tornar possível este tipo de reabilitação. Procedimentos menos invasivos, como próteses convencionais, surgem como uma opção terapêutica para reabilitação de casos em que não há estrutura óssea suficiente para implantes e não há aceitação de procedimentos invasivos por parte dos pacientes. Sendo assim, este trabalho teve como objetivo apresentar a resolução de uma reabilitação por meio de tratamento não invasivo e multidisciplinar. A paciente, gênero feminino, compareceu a clínica da faculdade apresentando próteses fixas mandibulares mal adaptadas bilateralmente, lesões endodônticas, recessão gengival nos dentes pilares e sensibilidade dentinária. Para a adequada resolução deste caso foi proposto à associação de implantes osseointegrados, prótese parcial fixa, exodontia e procedimentos periodontais estéticos, com a utilização de enxerto de tecido conjuntivo subepitelial. Após dois anos de pós-operatório, a paciente mostrou satisfação estética e mastigatória. Com base no caso apresentado, este trabalho discutiu os diversos fatores que podem afetar a escolha de uma determinada modalidade de tratamento, para a reabilitação de espaços edêntulos unitários.
Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease that results in the destruction of teeth and their supporting tissues with subsequent tooth loss. The replacement of missing teeth for implant-supported restorations has proven to be a highly predictable treatment method with good long-term prognosis. However, some consequences of tooth loss prevents dental implant placement in an ideal position, where regenerative procedures are necessary for this type of rehabilitation. Less invasive procedures such as conventional prosthesis emerge as a therapeutic option in cases where there is enough bone structure for implants and patient´s non-acceptance for invasive procedures. Thus, this paper aims to present the resolution of rehabilitation through a noninvasive and multidisciplinary treatment. One female patient referred to the clinic presented maladaptive bilateral mandibular fixed prostheses, endodontic lesions, gingival recession, and root sensitivity. For proper resolution of this case, an association among osseointegrated implants, fixed partial prosthesis, tooth extraction, and aesthetic periodontal procedures with the use of subepithelial connective tissue graft was proposed. After two years, the patient shows excellent aesthetics and chewing. Within the limits of this scenario, this paper discusses the various factors that may affect the choice of a particular treatment modality for the rehabilitation of edentulous single spaces.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Implantação Dentária , Prótese Parcial FixaRESUMO
Objetivo: comparar injertos de tejido blando autólogos y alógenos para el tratamiento de defectos clase I de Seibert. Métodos: se seleccionaron 18 sitios quirúrgicos, de 14 pacientes, y se asignaron aleatoriamente. Fueron asignados ocho sitios quirúrgicos para recibir injerto autólogo de tejido conectivo, y nueve para recibir injerto alógeno de fascia muscular. Se tomaron cuatro modelos diagnósticos para las mediciones, uno al inicio, y luego al primero, al segundo y al cuarto mes después de la cirugía. Adicionalmente, se realizaron seis biopsias del grupo de fascia. Resultados: el grupo control presentó una profundidad inicial promedio de 2,29 ± 0,55 mm, y el experimental, 3,50 ± 0,85 mm. La ganancia en espesor al primero, al segundo y al cuarto mes fue de 71,2, 46,52 y 28,5% en la fascia, y de 56,53, 38,31 y 38,1% en el tejido conectivo, respectivamente. La fascia se reabsorbió 28,8, 53,48 y 71,5%, al primero, al segundo y al cuarto mes, y el tejido conectivo se reabsorbió 43,47, 61,69 y 61,69%, respectivamente. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los dos grupos (p>0,05). El análisis histológico mostró presencia de tejido colágeno denso, poco celular, entremezclado con el tejido conectivo del huésped. La fascia tuvo una mayor tendencia a la reabsorción que el tejido conectivo, y la ganancia al cuarto mes en ambos fue similar. Sin embargo, el tejido conectivo fue más estable en el tiempo. La fascia mostró menor morbilidad,e histológicamente se observó presencia de este injerto después de 20 semanas. Conclusiones: la fascia humana constituye una alternativa de tratamiento para corregir defectos de reborde en el sector anterior.
Aim: Compare tissue grafting from autologous and allogenous sources for the treatment of Seibert Class I border defects. Methods: 18 surgical sites from 14 patients were selected and randomly assigned. 8 surgical sites received connective tissue grafts from autologous donor sites, and 9 surgical sites received allogenous muscular fascia grafts. 4 diagnostic casts were taken for comparative study (baseline, 1 month, 2nd month and 4th month postsurgical). In addition, 6 tissue punch biopsies were taken from the fascia group to determine presence of fascia tissue. ResultsThe control group showed an average tissue depth of 2.29 ± 0.55 mm and the experimental group showed 3.5 ± 0.85 mm, at baseline. Tissue gain for the fascia group was 71.2%, 46.52% y 28.5% for the 1st, 2nd and 4th months respectively, and the control group presented 56.53%, 38.31% y 38.1% respectively. There were not statistically significant differences between the two treatments (p>0,05). Histological analysis of the fasciagroup showed dense collagen tissue and host connective tissue at the 4th month. Fascia tissue grafts seemed to reabsorb faster than the connective tissue from the control group and the gain in tissue size at the 4th month was similar in both groups. The fascia tissue group, however, seemed to present less morbidity and was found in the histological samples at the 20 week postsurgical measurements. The connective tissue grafts were more stable in the treatment of Seibert I border defects. Conclusions: Human muscular fascia tissue could be an alternative treatment for the correction of Seibert class I border defects.