Is re-Rex shunt a better choice for patients with failed Rex shunt?

Purpose: To review our single-center surgical outcomes of redo operations after failed Rex shunt procedures. Methods: From September 2017 to October 2021, a total of 20 patients (11 males, 9 females; median age: 8.6 years) with Rex shunt occlusions were admitted to our hospital. Two of these patients were previously operated on in our hospital, and the remaining 18 were from other centers. All patients underwent repeat operations after detailed preoperative evaluations. Results: Preoperative wedged hepatic vein portography (WHVP) was conducted for 18 patients. Thirteen patients exhibited well-developed Rex recessus and intrahepatic portal vein during WHPV examination, consistent with the intraoperative exploration results. Fifteen patients (75%, 15/20) underwent redo-Rex shunt, four underwent Warren shunt and one underwent devascularization surgery. During the redo-Rex shunt operations, the left internal jugular veins (IJV) were used as bypass grafts in 11 patients; the intra-abdominal veins were used in 4 patients. The patients were followed up for 12-59 months (mean, 24.8 months). After redo Rex shunts, the grafts were patent in 14 patients (93.3%, 14/15), but 1 graft had thrombosis (6.7%, 1/15). Three patients suffered from postoperative anastomotic stenosis, and all of the stenosis was relieved with balloon dilatations. After re-Rex shunts, esophageal varices and spleen size were substantially reduced, and the platelet count significantly increased. Postoperative graft thrombosis was found in 1 patient after Warren shunt (1/4, 25%), and there was no graft stenosis. Compared with Warren surgery, patients who underwent re-Rex shunt had a significantly higher rate of platelet increase. Conclusions: Redo-rex shunts can be finished in most patients with failed Rex shunts. Re-Rex shunt is a preferred surgical choice after a failed Rex shunt when a good bypass graft is available, and the surgical success rate can reach more than 90%. A suitable bypass graft is essential for a successful redo Rex shunt. Preoperative WHVP is recommended for the design of a redo surgical plan preoperatively.

An analysis on the use of Warren's distal splenorenal shunt surgery for the treatment of portal hypertension at the University Hospitals Leuven.

INTRODUCTION: Extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is the most common cause of portal hypertension (PH), particularly in children. PH-related manifestations include refractory variceal bleeding, splenomegaly and ascites. Albeit more rarely performed, the distal splenorenal shunt (Warren's shunt) has proven to be effective in selectively decompressing the collateral circulation. The aim of our study was to describe our experience with the distal splenorenal shunt and to determine the long-term effect on PH-related side-effects. METHODS: Distal splenorenal shunt operations performed at our institution between 2000 and 2014 were reviewed for: age, male/female ratio, children/adults ratio, body mass index, indications, grade of PVT (Yerdel classification), maximal shunt-flow velocity, shunt patency and thrombosis, re-intervention for variceal bleeding and survival. Complications of PH (esophageal variceal bleeding and ascites) were compared pre- versus post-operatively (last follow-up). Paired student t-test and fisher's exact were applied for pre- versus post-operative comparison. Results are reported as median [range]. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with PVT and refractory complications of PH underwent distal splenorenal shunt surgery. Age was 15 years [4.5-66]. Male/female ratio was 7/7. PVT -grade was 2 [1-4]. Follow-up was 3 [0.5-14]. All shunts were patent (100%) with no shunt thrombosis (0%) at last follow-up. There was no re-intervention for variceal bleeding (0%) and survival at last follow-up was 100%. Occurrence of esophageal variceal bleeding was higher pre-operatively (57%) than postoperatively (0%) (p = .0032) and also the incidence of ascites was higher pre-operatively (79%) than postoperatively (0%) (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our experience, the distal splenorenal shunt can be considered a valuable surgical technique for PVT-induced PH, with excellent post-operative prevention of complications of PH.

Surgical treatment for rebleeding caused by bypass failure after Rex shunt: re-Rex shunt or Warren shunt?

PURPOSE: Although Rex shunt is an effective treatment for extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO), 4-20% children develop rebleeding postoperatively. This study was used to evaluate the surgical treatment of rebleeding after Rex shunt in our center. METHOD: From June 2008 to Jan 2017, 12 of 122 children with EHPVO underwent a second operation due to graft stenosis and occlusion after Rex shunt in our center. The abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) showed the occlusion of bypass vein in nine children, stenosis of bypass vein in two children, and the patency of bypass vein in one child with dysplasia of intrahepatic portal vein. A re-Rex shunt was performed in eight children, of which one child required conversion to Warren shunt due to postoperative rebleeding. Five children underwent Warren shunt due to a narrowed left portal vein shown by intraoperative portal angiography and surgical exploration. All patients were followed up in this study. RESULTS: The postoperative incidences of re-bleeding and esophageal varices in children with Warren shunt were significantly lower than those in children undergoing re-Rex shunt (P = 0.027 and 0.015). After a second operation, the rate of bypass vein patency in children with re-Rex shunt was lower than that in children with Warren shunt (50 vs. 100%). The postoperative reduced size of spleen in children undergoing Warren shunt was significantly higher than that of children undergoing re-Rex shunt (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing to re-Rex shunt, Warren shunt was a better treatment for rebleeding caused by bypass failure after Rex shunt.

Distal pancreatectomy with splenorenal shunt to preserve spleen in a cirrhotic patient.

At pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with a high recurrence rate. Due to its high potentials of local invasion and distant metastasis, surgical resection is the only means for possible long-term survival. Surgical treatment comprises a distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy. Surgery has been conventionally contraindicated for patients with cirrhosis and portal vein hepato-biliary hypertension. Splenorenal shunt was first described by Warren and colleagues, to prevent death from bleeding esophageal varices in a patient with a patent portal vein hypertension. A 55-year-old Caucasian woman presented with an incidental pancreatic tumor. In our case, the shunt was necessary to complete the corrective oncological surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The main difficulty was the presence of portal hypertension due to liver cirrhosis Child A; moreover, preservation of the spleen was mandatory in this patient. We successfully performed a distal pancreatectomy without splenectomy through the help of splenorenal shunt to preserve venous circulation.