Interaction of GABAA and GABAB antagonists after status epilepticus in immature rats.

Among neurotransmitter systems affected by status epilepticus (SE) in adult rats are both GABAergic systems. To analyze possible changes of GABAA and GABAB systems in developing rats lithium-pilocarpine SE was induced at postnatal day 12 (P12). Seizures were elicited by a GABAA antagonist pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) 3, 6, 9, and 13 days after SE (i.e., in P15, P18, P21, and P25 rats), and their possible potentiation by a GABAB receptor antagonist CGP46381 was studied. Pilocarpine was replaced by saline in control animals (lithium-paraldehyde [LiPAR]). Pentylenetetrazol in a dose of 50 mg/kg s.c. elicited generalized seizures in nearly all 15-day-old naive rats and in 40% of 18-day-old ones but not in older animals. After SE, PTZ no longer elicited seizures in these two younger groups, i.e., sensitivity of GABAA system was diminished. The GABAB antagonist exhibited proconvulsant effect in P15 and P18 SE as well as LiPAR rats returning the incidence of PTZ-induced seizures to values of control animals. A decrease in the incidence of minimal clonic seizures was seen in P21 LiPAR animals; these seizures in the oldest group were not affected. Change of the effect from proconvulsant to anticonvulsant (or at least to no action) took place before postnatal day 21. Both SE and LiPAR animals exhibited similar changes but their intensity differed, effects in LiPAR controls were usually more expressed than in SE rats.

Reducing Adverse Effects During Drug Development: The Example of Lesogaberan and Paresthesia.

PURPOSE: Lesogaberan, a γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)B receptor agonist, was developed for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with a partial response to proton pump inhibitor therapy. A high prevalence of paresthesia was observed in healthy individuals after dosing with lesogaberan in early-phase clinical trials. The aim of this review was to gain further insight into paresthesia caused by lesogaberan by summarizing the relevant preclinical and clinical data. METHODS: This study was a narrative review of the literature and unpublished data. FINDINGS: The occurrence of paresthesia may depend on the route or rate of drug administration; several studies were conducted to test this hypothesis, and formulations were developed to minimize the occurrence of paresthesia. Phase I clinical studies showed that, in healthy individuals, paresthesia occurred soon after administration of lesogaberan in a dose-dependent manner regardless of the route of administration. The occurrence of paresthesia could be decreased by fractionating the dose or reducing the rate of administration. These findings suggest that the initial rate of absorption plays an important part in the development of paresthesia. Modified-release formulations minimize the occurrence of paresthesia while retaining the anti-reflux activity of the drug, as measured by esophageal pH and the number of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations. IMPLICATIONS: The development of lesogaberan was halted because the effect on gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms observed in Phase II studies was not considered clinically meaningful in the target patient population. Nevertheless, it is an example of successful formulation development designed to minimize the occurrence of a compound's adverse effect while retaining its pharmacodynamic action.

Dose-dependent effects of lesogaberan on reflux measures in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The γ-aminobutyric acid type B-receptor agonist lesogaberan (AZD3355) has been developed for use in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (partial responders). This study aimed to explore the dose-response effect of lesogaberan on reflux episodes in partial responders. METHODS: In this randomized, single-centre, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study, partial responders taking optimised PPI therapy were given 30, 90, 120 and 240 mg doses of lesogaberan. Each dose was given twice (12 h apart) during a 24-h period, during which impedance-pH measurements were taken. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included in the efficacy analysis and 27 in the safety analysis. The effect of lesogaberan on the mean number of reflux episodes was dose-dependent, and all doses significantly reduced the mean number of reflux episodes relative to placebo. Lesogaberan also dose-dependently reduced the mean number of acid reflux episodes (except the 30 mg dose) and weakly acid reflux episodes (all doses) significantly, relative to placebo. Regardless of dose, lesogaberan had a similar effect on the percentage of time with esophageal pH < 4 [mean reduction: 68.5% (30 mg), 54.2% (90 mg), 65.9% (120 mg), 72.1% (240 mg); p < 0.05 except 90 mg dose]. No adverse events led to discontinuation and no serious adverse events occurred during active treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Lesogaberan inhibited reflux in a dose-dependent manner in partial responders taking optimised PPI therapy, and these effects were significant versus placebo. All lesogaberan doses were well tolerated and were not associated with clinically relevant adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01043185.

Effect of food on the bioavailability of lesogaberan given as an oral solution or as modified-release capsules in healthy male volunteers.

The novel Type B gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAB)-receptor agonist lesogaberan (AZD3355) has been evaluated as an add-on to proton pump inhibitor treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease, but the effect of food on the bioavailability of this compound has not been assessed. In this openlabel crossover study, healthy males received single 100 mg doses of lesogaberan (oral solution (A) or oral modified release (MR) capsules with a dissolution rate of 50% (B) or 100% (C) over 4 h) with and without food. Blood plasma concentrations of lesogaberan were assessed over 48 h. A log-transformed geometric mean Cmax and AUC ratio within the 90% confidence interval (CI) range (0.80 - 1.25) was defined as excluding a clinically relevant food effect. Overall, 57 subjects completed the study. Only the oral lesogaberan solution had a fed/fasting Cmax ratio outside the 90% CI range (Cmax ratio: 0.76). AUC ratios were within the 90% CI limits for all three lesogaberan formulations. The only substantial change in tmax associated with food intake was observed for the oral solution (1.0 h without food, 1.8 h with food). In conclusion, a clinically relevant food effect could be excluded for the lesogaberan MR formulations, but not for the oral lesogaberan solution.

A novel reflux inhibitor lesogaberan (AZD3355) as add-on treatment in patients with GORD with persistent reflux symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor therapy: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: o evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of add-on treatment with lesogaberan (AZD3355), a novel reflux inhibitor, in patients with persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. METHODS: double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, parallel-group, multicentre phase IIA study was carried out in outpatient clinics. The study group comprised 244 adult patients with persistent GORD symptoms (heartburn and/or regurgitation) of at least mild intensity and for 3 days of 7 days before enrolment, despite ≥6 weeks of continuous PPI therapy. Patients received either lesogaberan (65 mg twice daily) or placebo in addition to PPI therapy for a period of 4 weeks. Symptom intensity, based on the Reflux Disease Questionnaire, was recorded twice daily. Treatment response (defined as at most one 24 h period with heartburn or regurgitation of not more than mild intensity during the last 7 days of treatment). Time to response, proportion of symptom-free days and measures of tolerability were also analysed. RESULTS: total of 232 (114 lesogaberan- and 118 placebo-treated patients) of the 244 randomised patients were analysed for efficacy. Treatment with lesogaberan, compared with placebo, resulted in a significantly larger proportion of responders to treatment (16% vs 8% of patients; p=0.026) and cumulative proportion of responders over time (log-rank p=0.0195). Lesogaberan was well tolerated: adverse events of mostly mild to moderate intensity were reported in 45% of patients on lesogaberan and in 37% on placebo. CONCLUSIONS: esogaberan add-on therapy to PPIs significantly improved heartburn and regurgitation symptoms; however, the proportion of responders was small. Clinical trial number NCT00394472.

The GABA B receptor agonist CGP44532 and the positive modulator GS39783 reverse some behavioural changes related to positive syndromes of psychosis in mice.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: An important role of GABAergic neurotransmission in schizophrenia was proposed a long time ago, but there is limited data to support this hypothesis. In the present study we decided to investigate GABA(B) receptor ligands in animal models predictive for the antipsychotic activity of drugs. The GABA(B) receptor antagonists CGP51176 and CGP36742, agonist CGP44532 and positive allosteric modulator GS39783 were studied. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effects of all ligands were investigated in MK-801- and amphetamine-induced hyperactivity tests. The anti-hallucinogenic-like effect of the compounds was screened in the model of head twitches induced by (±)1-(2.5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI). Furthermore, the effect of GS39783 and CGP44532 on DOI-induced frequency of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in slices from mouse brain frontal cortices was investigated. The anti-cataleptic properties of the compounds were also assessed. KEY RESULTS: The GABA(B) receptor activators CGP44532 and GS39783 exhibited antipsychotic-like effects both in the MK-801- and amphetamine-induced hyperactivity tests, as well as in the head-twitch model in mice. Such effects were not observed for the GABA(B) receptor antagonists. DOI-induced increased frequency of spontaneous EPSCs was also decreased by the compounds. Moreover, CGP44532 and GS39783 inhibited haloperidol-induced catalepsy and EPSCs. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: These data suggest that selective GABA(B) receptor activators may be useful in the treatment of psychosis.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between lesogaberan (AZD3355) and esomeprazole in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) have been identified as a primary cause of reflux events in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). GABA(B) receptor agonists such as lesogaberan (AZD3355) have been shown to inhibit TLESRs in healthy subjects and patients with GERD, and, therefore, offer a novel therapeutic add-on strategy to acid suppression for the management of GERD. As lesogaberan is being developed as an add-on treatment for the management of patients with GERD who have a partial response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, it is important to rule out any clinically important pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between lesogaberan and PPIs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of esomeprazole on the pharmacokinetics and safety of lesogaberan and vice versa. STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label, randomized, three-way crossover study. The study was open to healthy adult male and female subjects. The study subjects received treatment with, in random order, lesogaberan (150 mg twice daily [dose interval 12 hours]), esomeprazole (40 mg once daily), and a combination of both, during 7-day treatment periods. MAIN OUTCOME: The presence or absence of pharmacokinetic interactions between lesogaberan and esomeprazole was assessed by measuring the steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curves during the dosing interval (AUC(τ)) and the maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) for lesogaberan and esomeprazole. RESULTS: Thirty male subjects (mean age 23.2 years, 97% Caucasian) were randomized to treatment and 28 subjects completed the study (one subject was lost to follow-up, and one subject discontinued due to an adverse event). The 95% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for AUC(τ) and C(max) of lesogaberan and esomeprazole administered alone and concomitantly were within the recognized boundaries of bioequivalence (0.8-1.25). No new safety concerns were raised during this study. The number of patients with adverse events during treatment with lesogaberan alone (n = 17) and concomitantly with esomeprazole (n = 18) were comparable but higher than with esomeprazole alone (n = 10). Paresthesia (episodic, mild, and transient), pharyngitis, and flatulence were the most frequently reported adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: There was no observed pharmacokinetic interaction between lesogaberan and esomeprazole when concomitantly administered to healthy subjects, and concomitant therapy was well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (clinicaltrials.gov): NCT00684190.

Effects of lesogaberan on reflux and lower esophageal sphincter function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are a major mechanism behind reflux. This study assessed the effects of lesogaberan (AZD3355), a novel gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor agonist, on reflux and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function when used as add-on treatment in patients with reflux symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, patients received lesogaberan (65 mg) or placebo twice on day 1 (morning/evening) and once on day 2 (morning), in addition to existing PPI treatment. Patients consumed a standardized meal 45-60 minutes after morning doses. Ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring was conducted for 24 hours after the first dose on day 1. Stationary manometry and impedance-pH monitoring was conducted for 4 hours after the third dose on day 2. RESULTS: Of 27 randomized patients, 21 were included in the per-protocol efficacy analysis. During the 24 hours after treatment start, lesogaberan reduced the mean number of reflux events by approximately 35% compared with placebo. During the 3 postprandial hours on day 2, lesogaberan reduced the geometric mean number of TLESRs by 25% and increased geometric mean LES pressure by 28% compared with placebo. The most common adverse events were headache (placebo: 11/27 patients; lesogaberan: 8/25 patients) and paresthesia (transient; placebo: 3/27 patients; lesogaberan: 5/25 patients). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with reflux symptoms despite PPI treatment, lesogaberan decreased the number of TLESRs and reflux episodes, and increased LES pressure compared with placebo. These findings support further evaluation of lesogaberan as an add-on treatment in patients partially responding to PPIs.

Microdose pharmacokinetics of IDX899 and IDX989, candidate HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, following oral and intravenous administration in healthy male subjects.

IDX899 and IDX989 are new non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) that exhibit potent inhibition of HIV-1 replication, including NNRTI-resistant mutants. This microdose study investigates the pharmacokinetics and determined oral bioavailability. For each compound, 4 healthy male subjects are randomized to receive via a crossover design a single 100-microg oral and intravenous dose together with 100 nCi of [(14)C]-labeled drug. Plasma and urine samples are obtained over a period of 168 hours postdose and analyzed for total, unchanged drug and major metabolites using an accelerator mass spectrometry method. Based on total radioactivity, oral absorption is near complete. For the parent drug, mean absolute bioavailability is 61% and 65% for IDX899 and IDX989, respectively. Both compounds are extensively metabolized especially after oral dosing. Observed terminal phase half-lives after oral and intravenous doses range from 4 to 10 hours and are comparable for the 2 compounds. Urine excretion of radioactivity for both compounds is less than 10%. These data show for the first time that IDX899 and IDX989 possess favorable pharmacokinetic properties in humans, including high mean absolute bioavailability and long half-life. IDX899 has been selected based on these initial pharmacokinetic assessments and other criteria as the candidate for further clinical development.

Lesogaberan, a GABA(B) agonist for the potential treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Lesogaberan, under development by AstraZeneca plc, is a GABA(B) agonist for the potential treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In vitro, lesogaberan was an efficient GABA(B) agonist and was taken up by GABA(B) receptors, thereby maintaining low extracellular levels of lesogaberan in the CNS and avoiding the serious CNS side-effect profile of the GABA(B) agonist baclofen. In phase I and IIa clinical trials, lesogaberan treatment was well tolerated, and resulted in a substantial reduction in reflux episodes by decreasing the frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations. At the time of publication, a phase IIa trial was ongoing in patients with GERD that was partially refractive to standard proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Lesogaberan may have potential to be used as an add-on therapy to PPIs. However, the safety, efficacy and advantages of lesogaberan compared with existing therapies remain to be established in phase IIb and III trials.

Single-dose escalation and multiple-dose safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of IDX899, a candidate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, in healthy subjects.

IDX899 is a novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) with potent in vitro activity against wild-type and NNRTI-resistant strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and with a high genetic barrier to resistance. Single rising doses of 50 and 100 (given by use of a 50-mg capsule) and 200, 400, 800, and 1,200 mg (given by use of a 200-mg capsule) of IDX899 or matching placebo were administered sequentially to cohorts of healthy male subjects, followed by the administration of multiple doses of 800 mg once daily (QD) or 400 mg twice daily (BID) for 7 days. A single dose of 400 mg was also administered to a cohort of females. IDX899 was administered orally under fasted (50- to 400-mg doses) and then fed (> or = 200-mg doses) conditions. Exposure to IDX899 was dose proportional and comparable in males and females. With a different drug-to-excipient ratio, the 50-mg capsule led to a higher exposure but a shorter mean terminal half-life (t(1/2)) of 6.2 to 6.8 h. The 200-mg capsule resulted in a more sustained exposure with a longer mean t(1/2) of 7.9 to 14.6 h. Food enhanced absorption by approximately twofold, while it delayed the time to the maximum concentration. The mean concentration at 24 h following the administration of a single 200-mg dose under fed conditions exceeded the in vitro protein binding-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration by fourfold. The levels of plasma exposure were similar between the single dosing and the repeat dosing with 800 mg QD and was approximately twofold higher with 400 mg BID. Mean steady-state trough levels were 0.9 microg/ml (range, 0.2 to 2.5 microg/ml) and 2.1 microg/ml (range, 0.5 to 4.5 microg/ml) for the 800-mg QD and 400-mg BID regimens, respectively. The level of excretion of unchanged drug in urine was negligible. IDX899 was well tolerated; and no serious adverse events, dose-dependent adverse events, or laboratory abnormalities were detected. These favorable safety and pharmacokinetic results support further clinical studies with patients with HIV-1 infection by the use of a QD regimen.

Improving non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for first-line treatment of HIV infection: the development pipeline and recent clinical data.

Efavirenz non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based therapy or boosted protease inhibitor (PI)-based therapy are currently recommended as first-line regimens for the treatment of HIV infection. Although the available therapy options are efficacious and well-tolerated in the majority of patients, treatment durability is still limited by drug-related side effects, inadequate patient adherence and the development of drug resistance. PI-based regimens have higher tablet loads, more complicated drug interactions and have been associated with gastrointestinal side effects and metabolic abnormalities. NNRTI-based regimens are efficacious, but have a low genetic barrier to resistance and have been associated with rash, hypersensitivity reactions and central nervous system side effects. There is, therefore, still a need for first-line antiviral agents that facilitate patient adherence and allow durable suppression of viral replication. The next-generation NNRTIs in development include rilpivirine (TMC-278), UK-453061, RDEA-806, IDX-899 and MK-4965. These NNRTIs demonstrate significant advantages over efavirenz, and may improve treatment options for first-line therapy. A number of other structurally diverse compounds that inhibit common NNRTI-resistant mutant viruses are also under investigation. In this review, the desirable features of a next-generation NNRTI for treatment-naïve patients are discussed, as well as the properties of the NNRTIs that are currently in development.

Effect of sodium hypophosphite feeding on adenosine triphosphatase activity in ageing Zaprionus paravittiger (Diptera).

Addition of antioxidant, sodium hypophosphite (SHP; 1 mM), to the diet of Zaprionus paravittiger (Diptera) results in depressed ATPase activity in both the sexes in comparison to the normal group. However, the rate of age-related decline in ATPase activity is lowered considerably in SHP fed group. Such changes in ATPase activity might be one of the important factors responsible for increased life span of flies with SHP feeding.