Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.063
Filtrar
1.
Rev. clín. esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 223(5): 270-280, may. 2023. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-219942

RESUMO

Introducción y objetivo La herramienta Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) analiza las estancias e ingresos hospitalarios inadecuados. El objetivo de este estudio fue adaptar el cuestionario AEP para analizar la adecuación de los ingresos y las estancias hospitalarias en nuestra realidad asistencial. Método Se desarrolló un estudio utilizando el método Delphi en el que participaron 15 expertos en gestión clínica y en asistencia hospitalaria. Los ítems del formulario inicial se conformaron a partir de la herramienta AEP tal y como fue definida en su primera versión. En la primera ronda los participantes aportaron nuevos ítems que consideraron relevantes en nuestra realidad actual. En las rondas 2 y 3 evaluaron 80 ítems según su relevancia mediante la utilización de una escala Likert del 1 al 4 (máxima utilidad). De acuerdo al diseño de nuestro estudio los ítems del AEP se consideraron adecuados si la media de la puntuación una vez evaluados por los expertos, era igual o superior a 3. Resultados Los participantes definieron un total de 19 nuevos ítems. Finalmente 47 ítems obtuvieron una puntuación media igual o superior a 3. El cuestionario resultante modificado consta de 17 ítems en «causas de admisiones adecuadas», 5 en «causas de admisiones inadecuadas», 15 en «causas de estancias adecuadas» y 10 en «causas de estancias inadecuadas». Conclusiones La identificación de ítems prioritarios para determinar la adecuación de los ingresos y las estancias prolongadas en nuestro medio y según la opinión de los expertos, podría definir un futuro instrumento para su utilización en nuestro entorno (AU)


Introduction and aim The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) tool analyzes inappropriate hospital stays and admissions. This study aimed to adapt the AEP questionnaire in order to analyze the appropriateness of hospital admissions and stays in our healthcare reality. Methods A study was conducted using the Delphi method in which 15 experts in clinical management and hospital care participated. The initial questionnaire items were taken from the first version of the AEP. In the first round, the participants contributed new items that they considered relevant in our current reality. In rounds 2 and 3, they evaluated 80 items according to their relevance using a Likert scale from 1 to 4 (maximum usefulness). Pursuant to the study's design, AEP items were considered adequate if the mean score according to the experts’ evaluation was greater than or equal to 3. Results The participants defined a total of 19 new items. In the end, 47 items earned a mean score greater than or equal to 3. The resulting modified questionnaire include 17 items in “Reasons for Appropriate Admissions”, 5 in “Reasons for Inappropriate Admissions”, 15 in “Reasons for Appropriate Hospital Stays”, and 10 in “Reasons for Inappropriate Hospital Stays”. Conclusions The identification according to expert opinion of priority items to determine the appropriateness of admissions and extended stays could be used in the future to help create an instrument to be used in our setting (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Planejamento Estratégico , Tempo de Internação , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Técnica Delphi , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
PLoS One ; 17(3): e0263688, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35263347

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 surge in Taiwan, the Far East Memorial Hospital established a system including a centralized quarantine unit and triage admission protocol to facilitate acute care surgical inpatient services, prevent nosocomial COVID-19 infection and maintain the efficiency and quality of health care service during the pandemics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing acute care surgery. The triage admission protocol was based on rapid antigen tests, Liat® PCR and RT-PCT tests. Type of surgical procedure, patient characteristics, and efficacy indices of the centralized quarantine unit and emergency department (ED) were collected and analyzed before (Phase I: May 11 to July 2, 2021) and after (Phase II: July 3 to July 31, 2021) the system started. RESULTS: A total of 287 patients (105 in Phase I and 182 in Phase II) were enrolled. Nosocomial COVID-19 infection occur in 27 patients in phase I but zero in phase II. More patients received traumatological, orthopedic, and neurologic surgeries in phase II than in phase I. The patients' surgical risk classification, median total hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and the number of patients requiring postoperative ICU care were similar in both groups. The duration of ED stay and waiting time for acute care surgery were longer in Phase II (397 vs. 532 minutes, p < 0.0001). The duration of ED stay was positively correlated with the number of surgical patients visiting the ED (median = 66 patients, Spearman's ρ = 0.207) and the occupancy ratio in the centralized quarantine unit on that day (median = 90.63%, Spearman's ρ = 0.191). CONCLUSIONS: The triage admission protocol provided resilient quarantine needs and sustainable acute care surgical services during the COVID-19 pandemic. The efficiency was related to the number of medical staff dedicated to the centralized quarantine unit and number of surgical patients visited in ED.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Triagem/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Quarentena , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Tempo para o Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Am J Surg ; 223(1): 126-130, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34373083

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Elderly rib fracture patients are generally admitted to an ICU which may result in overutilization of scarce resources. We hypothesized that this practice results in significant overtriage. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients over age 70 with acute rib fracture(s) as sole indication for ICU admission. Primary outcomes were adverse events (intubation, pneumonia, death), which we classified as meriting ICU admission. We utilized Cribari matrices to calculate triage rates. RESULTS: 101 patients met study criteria. 12% had adverse events occurring on average at day 5. Our undertriage rate was 6% and overtriage rate 87%. The 72 overtriaged patients utilized 295 total ICU days. Evaluating guideline modification, ≥3 fractures appears optimal. Changing to this would have liberated 50 ICU days with 3% undertriage. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with small numbers of rib fractures are overtriaged to ICUs. Modifying guidelines to ≥3 rib fractures will improve resource utilization and save ICU beds.


Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/normas , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fraturas das Costelas/diagnóstico , Triagem/normas , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia/normas
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 51: 163-168, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34741995

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of emergency department (ED) crowding levels on patient admission decisions and outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed based on 2-year electronic health record data from a tertiary care hospital ED in Alberta, Canada. Using modified Poisson regression models, we studied the association of patient admission decisions and 7-day revisit probability with ED crowding levels measured by: 1) the total number of patients waiting and in treatment (ED census), 2) the number of boarding patients (boarder census), and 3) the average physician workload, calculated by the total number of ED patients divided by the number of physicians on duty (physician workload census). The control variables included age, gender, treatment area, triage level, and chief complaint. A subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the heterogeneous effects among patients of different acuity levels. RESULTS: Our dataset included 141,035 patient visit records after cleaning from August 2013 to July 2015. The patient admission probability was positively correlated with ED census (relative risk [RR] = 1.006, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.005 to 1.007) and physician workload census (RR = 1.029, 95% CI = 1.027 to 1.032), but inversely correlated with boarder census (RR = 0.991, 95% CI = 0.989 to 0.993). We further found that the 7-day revisit probability of discharged patients was positively associated with boarder census (RR = 1.009, 95% CI = 1.004 to 1.014). CONCLUSIONS: Patient admission probability was found to be directly associated with ED census and physician workload census, but inversely associated with the boarder census. The effects of boarder census and physician workload census were stronger for patients of triage levels 3-5. Our results suggested that (i) insufficient physician staffing may lead to unnecessary patient admissions; (ii) too many boarding patients in ED leads to an increase in unsafe discharges, and as a result, an increase in 7-day revisit probability.


Assuntos
Censos , Aglomeração , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Triagem/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Alberta , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Triagem/normas , Triagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
5.
Pan Afr Med J ; 40: 49, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34795829

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: despite the adoption of mental disorders act in 1972, the use of required mental health care act (MHCA) forms during admission of patients with mental illnesses remained below the legal expectation in the Maun District Hospital. This study audited Letsholathebe II Memorial Hospital (LIIMH) professionals´ usage of MHCA forms. METHODS: this was a quasi-experimental study that audited files of patients admitted with mental illnesses, before, three and six months after a continuing medical education (CME). Cochran Q, McNemar symmetry Chi-square were used for comparison of performance. RESULTS: of the 239 eligible files, we accessed 235 (98.3%). About two in ten (n=36/235, 15.3%) MHCA forms were not used in combination with required forms. The quasi-majority of MHCA forms set used, aligned with involuntary admission (n=134/137, 97.8%). Required admission MHCA forms significantly increased from nil before continuing medical education (CME-0), to 64.6% (n=51/79) at CME-3 and 77% (n=59/77) at CME-6 (p<0.001). However, there was no statistical difference between the last two periods (64.6% vs 77%, p=0.164). Voluntary admission remained below 13% (n=10/79). Only six types of MHCA forms were used during this study. CONCLUSION: there was no adequate use of required MHCA forms at LIIMH before CME. Thereafter, the proportion of adequate use increased from period CME-0 to the periods CME-3 and CME-6. However, there was no difference in proportion between the last two periods. We recommend an effective and regular CME twice a year for health professionals on selected MHCA forms.


Assuntos
Educação Continuada/métodos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Botsuana , Feminino , Formulários como Assunto , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Hospitais/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Admissão do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Atenção Primária à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto Jovem
6.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 23(7): 420-425, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34251124

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Syncope is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits; however, the decision to admit or discharge patients after a syncopal episode remains challenging for emergency physicians. Decision rules such as the Boston Syncope Criteria have been developed in an attempt to aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients as well as those who can be safely discharged, but applying these rules to different populations remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the Boston Syncope Criteria are valid for emergency department patients in Israel. METHODS: This retrospective cohort convenience sample included patients who visited a tertiary care hospital in Jerusalem from August 2018 to July 2019 with a primary diagnosis of syncope. Thirty-day follow-up was performed using a national health system database. The Boston Syncope Criteria were retrospectively applied to each patient to determine whether they were at high risk for an adverse outcome or critical intervention, versus low risk and could be discharged. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and completed follow-up. Of these, 21 patients had either an adverse outcome or critical intervention. The rule detected 20/21 with a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 66%, and a negative predictive value of 99. CONCLUSIONS: The Boston Syncope Criteria may be useful for physicians in other locations throughout the world to discharge low-risk syncope patients as well as identify those at risk of complications.


Assuntos
Regras de Decisão Clínica , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Seleção de Pacientes , Medição de Risco , Síncope , Idoso , Procedimentos Clínicos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Alta do Paciente/normas , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Medição de Risco/normas , Síncope/diagnóstico , Síncope/epidemiologia , Síncope/etiologia , Síncope/terapia
8.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 103(7): 496-498, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34192485

RESUMO

As the COVID-19 pandemic progressed across the UK and Northern Ireland in March 2020, our otolaryngology department began to make preparations and changes in practice to accommodate for potentially large numbers of patients with COVID-19 related respiratory illness in the hospital. We retrospectively reviewed the number of non-elective admissions to our department between the months of January and May in 2019 and 2020. A significant reduction in admissions of up to 94% during the months of the pandemic was observed. Our practice shifted to manage patients with epistaxis and peritonsillar abscess on an outpatient basis, and while prospectively collecting data on this, we did not observe any significant adverse events. We view this as a positive learning point and change in our practice as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/tendências , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/tendências , Admissão do Paciente/tendências , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Epistaxe/cirurgia , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Irlanda do Norte/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Abscesso Peritonsilar/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/normas , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 103(7): 478-480, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34192500

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on perioperative outcomes of surgical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic to inform continued operating into the winter period. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the rate of 30-day COVID-19 transmission and mortality of all surgical patients in the three hospitals in our trust in the East of England during the first lockdown in March 2020. All patients who underwent a swab were swabbed on or 24 hours prior to admission. RESULTS: There were 4,254 patients and an overall 30-day mortality of 0.99%. The excess surgical mortality in our region was 0.29%. There were 39 patients who were COVID-19 positive within 30 days of admission, 12 of whom died. All 12 were emergency admissions with a length of stay longer than 24 hours. There were three deaths among those who underwent day case surgery, one of whom was COVID-19 negative, and the other two were not swabbed but not suspected to have COVID-19. There were two COVID-19 positive elective cases and none in day case elective or emergency surgery. There were no COVID-19 positive deaths in elective or day case surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There was a low rate of COVID-19 transmission and mortality in elective and day case operations. Our data have allowed us to guide patients in the consent process and provided the evidence base to restart elective and day case operating with precautions and regular review. A number of regions will be similarly affected and should perform a review of their data for the winter period and beyond.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/mortalidade , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/mortalidade , Tratamento de Emergência/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/transmissão , Teste para COVID-19/normas , Teste para COVID-19/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento de Emergência/normas , Tratamento de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Incidência , Controle de Infecções/normas , Controle de Infecções/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Medicina Estatal/normas , Medicina Estatal/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
World Neurosurg ; 152: e387-e397, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34087463

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy is a proven treatment for large-vessel ischemic stroke with improved functional outcomes compared with intravenous thrombolytics. Access to thrombectomy-capable sites varies greatly by geography, often necessitating interhospital transfer of patients who first present to hospitals unable to provide thrombectomy. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the impact of interhospital transportation on patient outcomes to better inform recommendations for prehospital protocols. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed following systematic literature searches. Outcomes of interest included successful reperfusion, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2, 90-day mortality, onset-to-puncture times, and door-to-puncture times. RESULTS: Pooled analysis comprised >27,000 patients. Door-to-puncture time was 35.6 minutes shorter among transferred patients; however, symptom onset-to-puncture time was 91.6 minutes longer. Rate of reperfusion or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage as well as 90-day mortality did not differ significantly between transferred and directly admitted patients. While the proportion of patients achieving good functional outcome at 90 days with modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 did not differ by admission type, when modified Rankin Scale score was narrowed to 0-1, direct transport showed 20% greater probability of achieving excellent functional outcome (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis represents the largest pooled population examined to date to assess how interfacility transportation to thrombectomy-capable sites affects patient outcomes. Our results indicate that direct admission is a significant predictor of excellent functional outcome. The findings presented here can be used to better inform quality improvement projects to streamline access to facilities providing endovascular mechanical thrombectomy capabilities.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , AVC Isquêmico/cirurgia , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Transferência de Pacientes/normas , Humanos , AVC Isquêmico/terapia , Reperfusão , Trombectomia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251686, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33984054

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Over time, ambulance assignments have increased in number both nationally and internationally, and a substantial proportion of patients encountered by emergency medical services are assessed as not being in need of services. Non-conveying patients has become a way for emergency medical services clinicians to meet this increasing workload. It has been shown that ambulances can be made available sooner if patients are non-conveyed, but there is no previous research describing the factors that influence the non-conveyance time. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe ambulance time consumption and the factors that influence time consumption when patients are non-conveyed. METHODS: A prospective observational review of 2615 non-conveyed patients' ambulance and hospital medical records was conducted using a consecutive sample. Data were analysed with the Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman's rank correlation (rho) for linear correlations. RESULTS: The mean NC time for all ambulance assignments during the study period was 26 minutes, with a median of 25 minutes. The shortest NC time was 4 minutes, and the longest NC time was 73 minutes. NC times were significantly faster during the day than at night. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new knowledge about time consumption when patients are non-conveyed. Although there are time differences when patients are non-conveyed, the differences observed in this study are small and not of clinical value. Ambulances will most often become available sooner if patients are non-conveyed. Although patients might be eligible for non-conveyance, policy-makers might have to decide when it is appropriate to non-convey patients from time, resource, patient safety and patient-centred care perspectives.


Assuntos
Ambulâncias/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Triagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ambulâncias/normas , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/normas , Estudos Prospectivos , Suécia , Fatores de Tempo , Triagem/normas , Adulto Jovem
12.
J Surg Res ; 264: 368-374, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33848835

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the secondary overtriage rate of pediatric trauma patients admitted to pediatric trauma centers. We hypothesized that pediatric secondary overtriage (POT) would constitute a large percentage of admissions to PTC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study database was retrospectively queried from 2003 to 2017 for pediatric (age ≤ 18 y) trauma patients transferred to accredited pediatric trauma centers in Pennsylvania (n = 6). Patients were stratified based on discharge within (early) and beyond (late) 24 h following admission. POT was defined as patients transferred to a PTC with an early discharge. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model controlling for demographic and injury severity covariates were utilized to determine the adjusted impact of injury patterns on early discharge. RESULTS: A total of 37,653 patients met inclusion criteria. For transfers, POT compromised 18,752 (49.8%) patients. Compared to POT, non-POT were more severely injured (ISS: 10 versus 6;P < 0.001) and spent less time in the ED (Min: 181 versus 207;P < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, concussion, closed skull vault fractures, supracondylar humerus fractures, and consults to neurosurgery were associated with increased odds of POT. Overall, femur fracture, child abuse evaluation, and consults to plastic surgery, orthopedics, and ophthalmology were all associated with a decreased risk of being POT. CONCLUSIONS: POT comprises 49.8% of PTC transfer admissions in Pennsylvania's trauma system. Improving community resources for management of pediatric concussion and mild TBI could result in decreased rates of POT to PTCs. Developing better inter-facility transfer guidelines and increased education of adult TC and nontrauma center hospitals is needed to decrease POT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III.


Assuntos
Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Triagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/prevenção & controle , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Alta do Paciente/normas , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Transferência de Pacientes/normas , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Pennsylvania , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Centros de Traumatologia/normas , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Triagem/organização & administração , Triagem/normas , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia
13.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 90(5): 769-775, 2021 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33891571

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Predicting rib fracture patients that will require higher-level care is a challenge during patient triage. Percentage of predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) incorporates patient-specific factors to customize the measurements to each patient. A single institution transitioned from a clinical practice guideline (CPG) using absolute forced vital capacity (FVC) to one using FVC% to improve triage of rib fracture patients. This study compares the outcomes of patients before and after the CPG change. METHODS: A review of rib fracture patients was performed over a 3-year retrospective period (RETRO) and 1-year prospective period (PRO). RETRO patients were triaged by absolute FVC. Percentage of predicted FVC was used to triage PRO patients. Demographics, mechanism, Injury Severity Score, chest Abbreviated Injury Scale score, number of rib fractures, tube thoracostomy, intubation, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), transfer to ICU, hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, and mortality data were compared. A multivariable model was constructed to perform adjusted analysis for LOS. RESULTS: There were 588 patients eligible for the study, with 269 RETRO and 319 PRO patients. No significant differences in age, gender, or injury details were identified. Fewer tube thoracostomy were performed in PRO patients. Rates of intubation, admission to ICU, and mortality were similar. The PRO cohort had fewer ICU transfers and shorter LOS and ICU LOS. Multivariable logistic regression identified a 78% reduction in odds of ICU transfer among PRO patients. Adjusted analysis with multiple linear regression showed LOS was decreased 1.28 days by being a PRO patient in the study (B = -1.44; p < 0.001) with R2 = 0.198. CONCLUSION: Percentage of predicted FVC better stratified rib fracture patients leading to a decrease in transfers to the ICU, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS. By incorporating patient-specific factors into the triage decision, the new CPG optimized triage and decreased resource utilization over the study period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management. Trauma, Rib, Triage, level IV.


Assuntos
Admissão do Paciente/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fraturas das Costelas/diagnóstico , Fraturas das Costelas/fisiopatologia , Capacidade Vital , Adulto , Idoso , Colorado/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Alocação de Recursos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas das Costelas/mortalidade , Centros de Traumatologia , Triagem/métodos
14.
Psychiatry Res ; 298: 113833, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33657449

RESUMO

Some psychiatric hospitals have instituted mandatory COVID-19 testing for all patients referred for admission. Others have permitted patients to decline testing. Little is known about the rate of COVID-19 infection in acute psychiatric inpatients. Characterizing the proportion of infected patients who have an asymptomatic presentation will help inform policy regarding universal mandatory versus symptom-based or opt-out testing protocols. We determined the COVID-19 infection rate and frequency of asymptomatic presentation in 683 consecutively admitted patients during the surge in the New York City region between April 3rd, 2020 and June 8th, 2020. Among these psychiatric inpatients, there was a 9.8 % overall rate of COVID-19 infection. Of the COVID-19 infected patients, approximately 76.1 % (51/67) either had no COVID-19 symptoms or could not offer reliable history of symptoms at the time of admission. Had they not been identified by testing and triaged to a COVID-19 positive unit, they could have infected others, leading to institutional outbreak. These findings provide justification for psychiatric facilities to maintain universal mandatory testing policies, at least until community infection rates fall and remain at very low levels.


Assuntos
Teste para COVID-19/normas , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitais Psiquiátricos/normas , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Adulto , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Triagem/normas
15.
Am J Nurs ; 121(2): 46-52, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33497127

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this project was to examine whether initiating a standardized pressure injury (PI) assessment and prevention protocol early in adult patients' ED stay reduces hospital-acquired PIs (HAPIs) in those patients admitted from the ED to acute care inpatient medical units. METHODS: A nurse-led evidence-based practice team studied the problem of increasing HAPIs on four acute care inpatient units and found that, among patients who had been admitted to inpatient care from the ED, longer ED boarding times correlated with a higher rate of HAPIs. ED staff and acute care unit nurses collaborated to develop new protocols to prevent HAPIs in the ED, including staff education and standardized assessments and prevention care for at-risk patients. Data collection was performed at three time periods over approximately two and a half years: baseline, intervention, and postintervention. RESULTS: The incidence rate for HAPIs decreased from 3.56 per 1,000 patient-days at baseline to 1.31 per 1,000 patient-days during the intervention period. This reduction was sustained over the next five months, during which the HAPI incidence rate was 1.53 per 1,000 patient-days. IMPLICATIONS: At a time when ED length of stay is difficult to manage and continues to increase, the use of evidence-based interventions and protocols can reduce the rate of PIs in high-risk patients waiting for hospital admission, leading to a reduction in PI rates and overall hospital costs.


Assuntos
Admissão do Paciente/normas , Úlcera por Pressão/prevenção & controle , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , California , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/prevenção & controle , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 27(2): 283-287, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32290764

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To implement and optimize a pilot transitions of care model for scheduled chemotherapy admissions in patients with hematologic malignancies at our institution.Methodology: We utilized the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) quality improvement technique to prospectively measure success of interventions related to improving transitions of care processes that occurred in multiple stages including development of standardized operating procedures, electronic medical record documentation, and education to the malignant hematology multidisciplinary group. Chart review was performed retrospectively for at least nine patients per PDSA cycle. Areas of intervention addressed and measured regarding communication between the ambulatory care and acute care settings included: admission purpose, processes related to insurance benefits investigations for specialty medications required in the post-discharge setting, and plan for growth factors, prophylactic antimicrobials, and follow-up.Results and conclusions: We included 28 patients and performed a total of three PDSA cycles demonstrating specific improvements in: communication regarding status of benefits investigations performed for specialty medications prior to admission, resolution of these benefits investigations at various time points, improvement in efficient use of the electronic medical record for chemotherapy orders, and patient instructions for appropriate use of prophylactic antimicrobials. Although improvement was noted initially with prescribing of discharge antiemetics and antimicrobials, regression to baseline was noted with the third PDSA cycle.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Benefícios do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Transferência de Pacientes/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Comunicação , Documentação , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Sistemas de Medicação no Hospital , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Transferência de Pacientes/organização & administração , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Estudos Retrospectivos
17.
J Med Virol ; 93(6): 3934-3938, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32869890

RESUMO

Annual outbreaks of seasonal influenza cause a substantial health burden. The aim of this study was to compare patient demographic/clinical data in two influenza patient groups presenting to hospital; those requiring O2 or critical care admission and those requiring less intensive treatment. The study was conducted from 1 December 2017 until 1 April 2019 at a district general hospital in East London. Patient demographic and clinical information was collected for all patients who had tested influenza positive by near-patient testing. χ2 test was used for categorical variables to see if there were significant differences for those admitted and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare the length of inpatient stay. Of 127 patients, 56 (44.1%) required oxygen or critical care. There were significant increases in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) observations (P %3C .001), Charlson comorbidity index (P = .049), length of inpatient stay (P %3C .001), and a strong association with increasing age (P = .066) when the more intensive treatment group was compared with the less intensive treatment group. A total of 13 (18.3%) of 71 patients not requiring oxygen or critical care were not admitted to the hospital. Following rapid influenza testing, NEWS scores, comorbidities, and age should be incorporated into a decision tool in Accident and Emergency to aid hospital admission or discharge decisions.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Gerais/estatística & dados numéricos , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Londres , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Triagem/normas , Adulto Jovem
19.
J Nurs Adm ; 51(1): 19-25, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33278197

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospital flow disruptions have been linked to treatment delays, longer length of stay (LOS), poor patient outcomes, and overburdened staff leading to disengagement. OBJECTIVE: This project was designed to evaluate and determine if the bed reaggregation was successful at meeting its goals. METHODS: Donabedian's framework guided the following evaluation points: 1) patient placement accuracy, 2) LOS variance, 3) emergency department (ED) boarding times, 4) hospital bypass hours, 5) operational declination rates, 6) patient satisfaction, and 7) RN engagement. Data were analyzed using pre-post percent change and χ analysis. RESULTS: Primary placement of patients, LOS variance, and operational declinations improved. Hours on bypass and ED boarding times were not reduced. RN engagement scores varied widely with significant decreases on 2 of the reaggregated units. Patient satisfaction scores varied, but overall did not decrease. CONCLUSION: Further consideration is needed for improving hospital bypass, ED boarding times, and RN engagement.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/tendências , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Admissão do Paciente/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , População Urbana
20.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(1): e018343, 2021 01 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33345559

RESUMO

Background Shortening the pain-to-balloon (P2B) and door-to-balloon (D2B) intervals in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is essential in order to limit myocardial damage. We investigated whether direct admission of PPCI-treated patients with STEMI to the catheterization laboratory, bypassing the emergency department, expedites reperfusion and improves prognosis. Methods and Results Consecutive PPCI-treated patients with STEMI included in the ACSIS (Acute Coronary Syndrome in Israel Survey), a prospective nationwide multicenter registry, were divided into patients admitted directly or via the emergency department. The impact of the P2B and D2B intervals on mortality was compared between groups by logistic regression and propensity score matching. Of the 4839 PPCI-treated patients with STEMI, 1174 were admitted directly and 3665 via the emergency department. Respective median P2B and D2B were shorter among the directly admitted patients with STEMI (160 and 35 minutes) compared with those admitted via the emergency department (210 and 75 minutes, P<0.001). Decreased mortality was observed with direct admission at 1 and 2 years and at the end of follow-up (median 6.4 years, P<0.001). Survival advantage persisted after adjustment by logistic regression and propensity matching. P2B, but not D2B, impacted survival (P<0.001). Conclusions Direct admission of PPCI-treated patients with STEMI decreased mortality by shortening P2B and D2B intervals considerably. However, P2B, but not D2B, impacted mortality. It seems that the D2B interval has reached its limit of effect. Thus, all efforts should be extended to shorten P2B by educating the public to activate early the emergency medical services to bypass the emergency department and allow timely PPCI for the best outcome.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Tempo para o Tratamento , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Manejo da Dor/normas , Admissão do Paciente/normas , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/fisiopatologia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/cirurgia , Tempo para o Tratamento/organização & administração , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...