Clinical and cortical trajectories in non-fluent primary progressive aphasia and Alzheimer's disease: A role for emotion processing.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the clinical trajectories and neural correlates of cognitive and emotion processing changes in the non-fluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA) and the logopenic (lvPPA) variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA). DESIGN: Observational case-control longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Research clinic of frontotemporal dementia. PARTICIPANTS: This study recruited 29 non-semantic PPA patients (15 nfvPPA and 14 lvPPA) and compared them with 15 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and 14 healthy controls. MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed an annual assessment (median = 2 years; range = 1-5 years) of general cognition, emotion processing and structural MRI. Linear mixed effects models investigated clinical and imaging trajectories between groups. RESULTS: Over time, lvPPA showed the greatest cognitive deterioration. In contrast, nfvPPA showed significant decline in emotion recognition, whereas AD showed preserved emotion recognition, even with disease progression. Importantly, lvPPA also developed emotion processing impairments, with disease progression. Both nfvPPA and lvPPA showed continuing cortical atrophy in hallmark language-processing regions associated with these syndromes, together with progressive involvement of the right hemisphere regions, mirroring left hemisphere atrophy patterns at presentation. Decline in emotion processing was associated with bilateral frontal atrophy in nfvPPA and right temporal atrophy in lvPPA. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show divergent clinical courses in nfvPPA and lvPPA, with rapid cognitive and neural deterioration in lvPPA and emotion processing decline in both groups and support the concurrent assessment of cognition and emotion processing in the clinic to inform diagnosis and monitoring in the non-semantic variants of PPA.

Neural basis of speech and grammar symptoms in non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia spectrum.

The non-fluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) is a neurodegenerative syndrome primarily defined by the presence of apraxia of speech (AoS) and/or expressive agrammatism. In addition, many patients exhibit dysarthria and/or receptive agrammatism. This leads to substantial phenotypic variation within the speech-language domain across individuals and time, in terms of both the specific combination of symptoms as well as their severity. How to resolve such phenotypic heterogeneity in nfvPPA is a matter of debate. 'Splitting' views propose separate clinical entities: 'primary progressive apraxia of speech' when AoS occurs in the absence of expressive agrammatism, 'progressive agrammatic aphasia' (PAA) in the opposite case, and 'AOS + PAA' when mixed motor speech and language symptoms are clearly present. While therapeutic interventions typically vary depending on the predominant symptom (e.g. AoS versus expressive agrammatism), the existence of behavioural, anatomical and pathological overlap across these phenotypes argues against drawing such clear-cut boundaries. In the current study, we contribute to this debate by mapping behaviour to brain in a large, prospective cohort of well characterized patients with nfvPPA (n = 104). We sought to advance scientific understanding of nfvPPA and the neural basis of speech-language by uncovering where in the brain the degree of MRI-based atrophy is associated with inter-patient variability in the presence and severity of AoS, dysarthria, expressive agrammatism or receptive agrammatism. Our cross-sectional examination of brain-behaviour relationships revealed three main observations. First, we found that the neural correlates of AoS and expressive agrammatism in nfvPPA lie side by side in the left posterior inferior frontal lobe, explaining their behavioural dissociation/association in previous reports. Second, we identified a 'left-right' and 'ventral-dorsal' neuroanatomical distinction between AoS versus dysarthria, highlighting (i) that dysarthria, but not AoS, is significantly influenced by tissue loss in right-hemisphere motor-speech regions; and (ii) that, within the left hemisphere, dysarthria and AoS map onto dorsally versus ventrally located motor-speech regions, respectively. Third, we confirmed that, within the large-scale grammar network, left frontal tissue loss is preferentially involved in expressive agrammatism and left temporal tissue loss in receptive agrammatism. Our findings thus contribute to define the function and location of the epicentres within the large-scale neural networks vulnerable to neurodegenerative changes in nfvPPA. We propose that nfvPPA be redefined as an umbrella term subsuming a spectrum of speech and/or language phenotypes that are closely linked by the underlying neuroanatomy and neuropathology.

Atypical TDP-43 proteinopathy clinically presenting with progressive nonfluent aphasia: A case report.

Progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA) is a form of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) caused by tau and transactive response DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43) accumulation. Here we report the autopsy findings of a 64-year-old right-handed man with an atypical TDP-43 proteinopathy who presented with difficulties with speech, verbal paraphasia, and dysphagia that progressed over the 36 months prior to his death. He did not show pyramidal tract signs until his death. At autopsy, macroscopic brain examination revealed atrophy of the left dominant precentral, superior, and middle frontal gyri and discoloration of the putamen. Spongiform change and neuronal loss were severe on the cortical surfaces of the precentral, superior frontal, and middle frontal gyri and the temporal tip. Immunostaining with anti-phosphorylated TDP-43 revealed neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions and long and short dystrophic neurites in the frontal cortex, predominantly in layers II, V, and VI of the temporal tip, amygdala, and transentorhinal cortex. Immunoblot analysis of the sarkosyl-insoluble fractions showed hyperphosphorylated TDP-43 bands at 45 kDa and phosphorylated C-terminal fragments at approximately 25 kDa. The pathological distribution and immunoblot band pattern differ from the major TDP-43 subtype and therefore may represent a new FTLD-TDP phenotype.

Clinical dimensions along the non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia spectrum.

It is debated whether primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS) and progressive agrammatic aphasia (PAA) belong to the same clinical spectrum, traditionally termed non-fluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), or exist as two completely distinct syndromic entities with specific pathologic/prognostic correlates. We analysed speech, language and disease severity features in a comprehensive cohort of patients with progressive motor speech impairment and/or agrammatism to ascertain evidence of naturally occurring, clinically meaningful non-overlapping syndromic entities (e.g. PPAOS and PAA) in our data. We also assessed if data-driven latent clinical dimensions with aetiologic/prognostic value could be identified. We included 98 participants, 43 of whom had an autopsy-confirmed neuropathological diagnosis. Speech pathologists assessed motor speech features indicative of dysarthria and apraxia of speech (AOS). Quantitative expressive/receptive agrammatism measures were obtained and compared with healthy controls. Baseline and longitudinal disease severity was evaluated using the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB). We investigated the data's clustering tendency and cluster stability to form robust symptom clusters and employed principal component analysis to extract data-driven latent clinical dimensions (LCD). The longitudinal CDR-SB change was estimated using linear mixed-effects models. Of the participants included in this study, 93 conformed to previously reported clinical profiles (75 with AOS and agrammatism, 12 PPAOS and six PAA). The remaining five participants were characterized by non-fluent speech, executive dysfunction and dysarthria without apraxia of speech or frank agrammatism. No baseline clinical features differentiated between frontotemporal lobar degeneration neuropathological subgroups. The Hopkins statistic demonstrated a low cluster tendency in the entire sample (0.45 with values near 0.5 indicating random data). Cluster stability analyses showed that only two robust subgroups (differing in agrammatism, executive dysfunction and overall disease severity) could be identified. Three data-driven components accounted for 71% of the variance [(i) severity-agrammatism; (ii) prominent AOS; and (iii) prominent dysarthria]. None of these data-driven LCDs allowed an accurate prediction of neuropathology. The severity-agrammatism component was an independent predictor of a faster CDR-SB increase in all the participants. Higher dysarthria severity, reduced words per minute and expressive and receptive agrammatism severity at baseline independently predicted accelerated disease progression. Our findings indicate that PPAOS and PAA, rather than exist as completely distinct syndromic entities, constitute a clinical continuum. In our cohort, splitting the nfvPPA spectrum into separate clinical phenotypes did not improve clinical-pathological correlations, stressing the need for new biological markers and consensus regarding updated terminology and clinical classification.

A cognitive marker for Alzheimer disease pathology in primary progressive aphasia? A validation study in the clinical setting.

We validated in the clinical setting a putative clinical marker for a biological diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) due to amyloid previously identified in an autopsy cohort and including impaired (score ≤4) digit span (DS) as index of phonological loop dysfunction and broadened criteria for logopenic PPA. In 29 PPA patients with an amyloid-positive (A+) biomarker and 28 PPA patients with an amyloid-negative (A-) biomarker, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis showed moderate specificity (71%) but insufficient sensitivity (41%) for the proposed marker. Specificity was particularly poor (58%) for the discrimination between A+ PPA and the A- subgroup with nonfluent PPA. DS may be compromised in both logopenic and nonfluent PPA, whose loci of neurodegeneration lie at the 2 ends of the left fronto-parieto-temporal system that underpins phonology. An Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) correlation analysis between DS score and metabolism on brain 18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography also showed a major contribution of the left frontal cortex to impaired span.

Afasia primaria progresiva variante no fluente/agramática / Non-fluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia

Introducción: Entre las enfermedades neurodegenerativas se encuentra un grupo de patologías que se caracterizan por un compromiso prominente del lenguaje, denominadas usualmente afasias primarias progresivas, las cuales se subdividen en 3 tipos: variante logopénica, variante semántica y variante no fluente o agramática. Presentación del caso: Paciente con cuadro clínico que inicia a los 65 años, con disminución en la interacción social. Un par de meses después, la esposa nota que el lenguaje del paciente se torna poco fluido, habla con palabras o frases cortas, no logra decir oraciones completas, además de presentar cambios en la entonación de las palabras y alteraciones del lenguaje escrito. El paciente manifiesta que su principal limitación en el momento es el no poder expresar lo que quiere decir, y por este motivo consulta. Discusión: En el caso de este paciente, se describe inicialmente un cambio en su personalidad que no compromete su funcionalidad, sin embargo, al poco tiempo se presenta compromiso del lenguaje como síntoma prominente y que genera mayor compromiso en su calidad de vida, con pruebas neuropsicológicas y hallazgos de neuroimagen que apoyan el diagnóstico de afasia primaria progresiva (APP) variante no fluente o agramatical, con síntomas comportamentales y motores asociados. Conclusión: Las APP son un grupo de trastornos neurocognitivos cuya característica primordial es el compromiso en el lenguaje, cada variante de APP tiene unas características clínicas y criterios diagnósticos específicos que se deben conocer para lograr sospechar el diagnóstico y hacer un abordaje apropiado en el paciente.

Introduction: In the group of neurodegenerative diseases, there is a group of pathologies that are characterized by a prominent compromise of language, normally called primary progressive aphasias, these are subdivided into 3 types: logopenic variant, semantic variant and non-fluent or agrammatic variant. Case presentation: Patient with a clinical picture that begins at age 65, with decreased social interaction, a couple of months later his wife notices that his language becomes not fluent, speaks in short words or phrases, cannot say complete sentences, in addition to changes in the intonation of words and alterations in written language, the patient states that his main limitation at the moment is not being able to express what he wants to say and for this reason they consult. Discussion: In the case of this patient, a change in his personality is initially described that does not compromise his functionality, however soon after a language involvement is presented as the main symptom and the one that generates a compromise in his quality of life, with neuropsychological tests and findings on neuroimaging that supports the diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) non-fluent or agrammatical variant, with associated behavioral and motor symptoms. Conclusion: APPs are a group of neurocognitive disorders whose primary characteristic is language impairment. Each APP variant has specific clinical characteristics and diagnostic criteria that must be known in order to suspect the diagnosis and make an appropriate approach to the patient.

Distinct neurophysiology during nonword repetition in logopenic and non-fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia.

Overlapping clinical presentations in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) variants present challenges for diagnosis and understanding pathophysiology, particularly in the early stages of the disease when behavioral (speech) symptoms are not clearly evident. Divergent atrophy patterns (temporoparietal degeneration in logopenic variant lvPPA, frontal degeneration in nonfluent variant nfvPPA) can partially account for differential speech production errors in the two groups in the later stages of the disease. While the existing dogma states that neurodegeneration is the root cause of compromised behavior and cortical activity in PPA, the extent to which neurophysiological signatures of speech dysfunction manifest independent of their divergent atrophy patterns remain unknown. We test the hypothesis that nonword deficits in lvPPA and nfvPPA arise from distinct patterns of neural oscillations that are unrelated to atrophy. We use a novel structure-function imaging approach integrating magnetoencephalographic imaging of neural oscillations during a non-word repetition task with voxel-based morphometry-derived measures of gray matter volume to isolate neural oscillation abnormalities independent of atrophy. We find reduced beta band neural activity in left temporal regions associated with the late stages of auditory encoding unique to patients with lvPPA and reduced high-gamma neural activity over left frontal regions associated with the early stages of motor preparation in patients with nfvPPA. Neither of these patterns of reduced cortical oscillations was explained by cortical atrophy in our statistical model. These findings highlight the importance of structure-function imaging in revealing neurophysiological sequelae in early stages of dementia when neither structural atrophy nor behavioral deficits are clinically distinct.

Functional Connectivity From Disease Epicenters in Frontotemporal Dementia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: MRI connectomics is an ideal tool to test a network-based model of pathologic propagation from a disease epicenter in neurodegenerative disorders. In this study, we used a novel graph theory-based MRI paradigm to explore functional connectivity reorganization, discerning between direct and indirect connections from disease epicenters, and its relationship with neurodegeneration across clinical presentations of the frontotemporal dementia (FTD) spectrum, including behavioral variant of FTD (bvFTD), nonfluent variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), and semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA). METHODS: In this observational cross-sectional study, disease epicenters were defined as the peaks of atrophy of a cohort of patients with high confidence of frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathology (Mayo Clinic). These were used as seed regions for stepwise functional connectivity (SFC) analyses in an independent (Milan) set of patients with FTD to assess connectivity in regions directly and indirectly connected to the epicenters. Correlations between SFC architecture in healthy conditions and atrophy patterns in patients with FTD were also tested. RESULTS: As defined by comparing the 42 Mayo Clinic patients with 15 controls, disease epicenters were the left anterior insula for bvFTD, left supplementary motor area for nfvPPA, and left inferior temporal gyrus (ITG) for svPPA. Compared with 94 age-matched controls, patients with bvFTD (n = 64) and nfvPPA (n = 34) of the Milan cohort showed widespread decreased SFC in bilateral cortical regions with direct/indirect connections with epicenters and increased SFC either in directly connected regions, physically close to the respective seed region, or in more distant cortical/cerebellar areas with indirect connections. Across all link steps, svPPA (n = 36) showed SFC decrease mostly within the temporal lobes, with co-occurrent SFC increase in cerebellar regions at indirect link steps. The average stepwise topological distance from the left ITG in a reference group of 50 young healthy controls correlated with regional gray matter volume in svPPA, consistent with network-based degeneration. DISCUSSION: Our findings demonstrate that each FTD syndrome is associated with a characteristic interplay of decreased and increased functional connectivity with the disease epicenter, affecting both direct and indirect connections. SFC revealed novel insights regarding the topology of functional disconnection across FTD syndromes, holding the promise to be used to model disease progression in future longitudinal studies.

Association of cortical and subcortical microstructure with disease severity: impact on cognitive decline and language impairments in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

BACKGROUND: Cortical and subcortical microstructural modifications are critical to understanding the pathogenic changes in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) subtypes. In this study, we investigated cortical and subcortical microstructure underlying cognitive and language impairments across behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), and nonfluent variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) subtypes. METHODS: The current study characterized 170 individuals with 3 T MRI structural and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences as portion of the Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuroimaging Initiative study: 41 bvFTD, 35 nfvPPA, 34 svPPA, and 60 age-matched cognitively unimpaired controls. To determine the severity of the disease, clinical dementia rating plus national Alzheimer's coordinating center behavior and language domains sum of boxes scores were used; other clinical measures, including the Boston naming test and verbal fluency test, were also evaluated. We computed surface-based cortical thickness and cortical and subcortical microstructural metrics using tract-based spatial statistics and explored their relationships with clinical and cognitive assessments. RESULTS: Compared with controls, those with FTLD showed substantial cortical mean diffusivity alterations extending outside the regions with cortical thinning. Tract-based spatial statistics revealed that anomalies in subcortical white matter diffusion were widely distributed across the frontotemporal and parietal areas. Patients with bvFTD, nfvPPA, and svPPA exhibited distinct patterns of cortical and subcortical microstructural abnormalities, which appeared to correlate with disease severity, and separate dimensions of language functions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings imply that cortical and subcortical microstructures may serve as sensitive biomarkers for the investigation of neurodegeneration-associated microstructural alterations in FTLD subtypes. Flowchart of the study design (see materials and methods for detailed description).

Buccofacial apraxia in primary progressive aphasia.

Buccofacial apraxia (BFA) is associated with nonfluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) as well as with the severity of apraxia of speech (AOS), a core symptom of nfvPPA. However, an association with agrammatism has not been established. The aim of this study was to examine the association between BFA and agrammatism in nfvPPA and to determine differences in atrophic regions in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) with and without BFA. Seventy-four patients with PPA were recruited, including 34, 15, 10, and 15 patients with nfvPPA, semantic variant PPA, logopenic variant PPA, and unclassified PPA, respectively. All patients underwent language examination and BFA evaluations. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was performed to determine whether atrophy of a specific lesion correlated with the presence of BFA. BFA was observed in 20 and 3 patients with nfvPPA and unclassified PPA, respectively. In a comparison of patients with nfvPPA with and without BFA, the BFA group showed significantly worse spontaneous speech and writing in the Western Aphasia Battery. The agrammatism ratio or the ratio of agrammatic errors to the total number of particles was higher in the BFA group; however, the severity of prosodic and phonetic components of AOS did not differ between the two groups. VBM showed that the severity of BFA correlated with atrophy of the opercular and triangular areas of the inferior frontal gyrus to a part of the left middle frontal gyrus. BFA has a different anatomical basis from AOS in patients with nfvPPA and that BFA is characterized by more anterior degeneration compared to that of AOS.

Acoustic and Kinematic Assessment of Motor Speech Impairment in Patients With Suspected Four-Repeat Tauopathies.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to use acoustic and kinematic speech measures to characterize type of motor speech impairment-apraxia of speech (AOS) versus dysarthria-in individuals with four-repeat tauopathy (4RT)-associated syndromes, including nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), primary progressive AOS (PPAOS), corticobasal syndrome (CBS), and progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome (PSPs). METHOD: Twenty patient participants were recruited and stratified into two groups: (a) a motor-speech-impaired group of individuals with nfvPPA, PPAOS, CBS, or PSPs and suspected 4RT pathology ("MSI+") and (b) a non-motor-speech-impaired group of individuals with logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia ("MSI-"). Ten healthy, age-matched controls also participated in the study. Participants completed a battery of speech tasks, and 15 acoustic and kinematic speech measures were derived. Quantitative speech measures were grouped into feature categories ("AOS features," "dysarthria features," "shared features"). In addition to quantitative speech measures, two certified speech-language pathologists made independent, blinded auditory-perceptual ratings of motor speech impairment. A principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to investigate the relative contributions of quantitative features. RESULTS: Quantitative speech measures were generally concordant with independent clinician ratings of motor speech impairment severity. Hypothesis-driven groupings of quantitative measures differentiated predominantly apraxic from predominantly dysarthric presentations within the MSI+ group. PCA results provided additional evidence for differential profiles of motor speech impairment in the MSI+ group; heterogeneity across individuals is explained in large part by varying levels of overall severity-captured by the shared feature variable group-and degree of apraxia severity, as measured by the AOS feature variable group. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative features reveal heterogeneity of MSI in the 4RT group in terms of both overall severity and subtype of MSI. Results suggest the potential for acoustic and kinematic speech assessment methods to inform characterization of motor speech impairment in 4RT-associated syndromes. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.21401778.

El uso de gestos en la comunicación de sujetos con afasia / The use of gestures in the communication of speakers with aphasia

Antecedentes y objetivos: Mucho se ha discutido sobre el uso de la gestualidad en la afasia. Tradicionalmente, los estudios se han centrado en dos aspectos: a)determinar si su empleo se encuentra deteriorado o no en la afasia, y b)si la presencia o ausencia de fluidez tiene alguna influencia en su uso. Sin embargo, en español son pocas las investigaciones que han abordado el estudio de la gestualidad en la afasia y los aspectos antes mencionados. Por tal motivo, el objetivo de esta investigación es analizar el empleo de gestos en cuatro hablantes con afasia para saber si la gestualidad se mantiene a pesar de la patología y para determinar cuál es el papel que desempeña la fluidez en el uso de gestos. Materiales y métodos: Participaron cuatro sujetos con afasia —dos con afasia fluida y dos con afasia no fluida—, por lo que fueron distribuidos en dos grupos. El estudio fue de tipo descriptivo-exploratorio de las conductas no verbales de los participantes. A cada sujeto se le realizó una entrevista semiestructurada con la intención de promover un índice de participación alto. Se evaluó el tipo y la cantidad de gestos utilizados, considerando la variable fluidez/no fluidez, a partir de las propuestas teóricas de Cosnier (1987) y Ekman (2004), principalmente. Resultados: Se observó que los sujetos con afasia conservan el empleo de gestos; además, los participantes con afasia no fluida emplean más gestos con una alta carga semántica y sin la presencia de habla, mientras que los sujetos con afasia fluida emplean menos gestos y con la presencia de habla. Conclusiones: El habla y los gestos son dos procesos independientes que trabajan en paralelo, por lo que el uso de gestos puede permanecer a pesar de las alteraciones lingüísticas de los hablantes con afasia. Los gestos son empleados como estrategias compensatorias que ayudan a que los hablantes con afasia se comuniquen a pesar de la pérdida del habla.(AU)

Background and objective: Much has been discussed about the use of gestures in aphasia. Mainly, studies have been focused on two aspects: (i)to stablish if gestures are employed normally in aphasia or if there is some loss in this capacity, and (ii)to determine if fluency plays a major role. However, in Spanish there are few researches which has tackle study about gestuality in aphasia and the two aspects mentioned before. For this reason, the aim of this study is analyzing the use of gestures in four aphasic-speakers to figure out if gestuality remains despite pathology, and determine what role plays the fluency in the use of gestures. Materials and methods: A descriptive-exploratory study of four subjects with aphasia has been carried out: two with fluent aphasia and two with non-fluent aphasia. A semi-structured interview was conducted with each subject in order to obtain a high participation rate. The type and amount of gestures used were evaluated from the theoretical proposals of Cosnier (1987) and Ekman (2004) mainly, and considering the fluency/non-fluency variable. Results: Both groups employ gestures, but non-fluent subjects use more gestures with a high semantic content and with no speech, meanwhile fluent speakers use less gestures and accompanied of speech. Conclusions: Speech and gestures are two independent processes working in parallel, and gestures are utilized as compensatory strategies which help to speakers with aphasia to communicate despite loss of speech.(AU)

Functional connectivity to the premotor cortex maps onto longitudinal brain neurodegeneration in progressive apraxia of speech.

Primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS) is a neurodegenerative motor speech disorder affecting the ability to produce speech. If agrammatic aphasia is present, it can be referred to as the non-fluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA). We investigated whether resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) connectivity from disease "epicenters" correlated with longitudinal gray matter atrophy and hypometabolism in nfvPPA and PPAOS. Eighteen nfvPPA and 23 PPAOS patients underwent clinical assessment, structural MRI, rs-fMRI, and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET at baseline and ∼2 years follow-up. Rates of neurodegeneration in nfvPPA and PPAOS correlated with functional connectivity to the premotor, motor, and frontal cortex. Connectivity to the caudate and thalamus was more strongly associated with rates of hypometabolism than atrophy. Connectivity to the left Broca's area was more strongly associated with rates of atrophy and hypometabolism in nfvPPA. Finally, functional connectivity to a network of regions, and not to a single epicenter, correlated with rates of neurodegeneration in PPAOS and nfvPPA, suggesting similar biological mechanisms driving disease progression, with regional differences related to language.

Genetic Spectrum and Clinical Heterogeneity of Chinese Frontotemporal Dementia Patients: Data from PUMCH Dementia Cohort.

BACKGROUND: There are relatively few data on the genetic spectrum of Chinese frontotemporal dementia (FTD) population. OBJECTIVE: With the dementia cohort of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, we aim to illustrate the genetic spectrum of FTD patients, as well as the phenotypic heterogeneity of FTD-gene variant carriers. METHODS: 204 unrelated, clinically diagnosed FTD patients of Chinese ancestry were enrolled. All the participants received demographic survey, history inquiry, physical examination, cognitive assessment, blood biochemical test, brain CT/MRI, and gene sequencing. RESULTS: 56.4% (115/204) participants were clinically diagnosed with behavioral variant of FTD, 20.6% (42/204) with nonfluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (PPA), 20.1% (41/204) with semantic variant PPA, and 2.9% (6/204) with mixed variant PPA. 11.8% (24/204) subjects harbored the potential causative variants in FTD-related genes, including the MAPT (n = 7), TBK1 (n = 7), GRN (n = 2), TBK1+GRN (n = 1), VCP (n = 1), TARDBP (n = 1), UBQLN2 (n = 1), SQSTM1 (n = 1), DCTN1 (n = 1), HNRNPA1 (n = 1), and C9orf72 GGGGCC repeats (n = 1). The TBK1 T31fs, T457fs, K622fs, c.359-1G>A, the VCP P188T, and the GRN P50fs, P439fs were novel pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. The TBK1 carriers showed a later disease onset and a higher incidence of parietal atrophy relative to the MAPTcarriers. CONCLUSION: There is genetic and clinical heterogeneity among Chinese FTD population. The TBK1 has a high mutation frequency in Chinese FTD patients.

Automated Detection of Speech Timing Alterations in Autopsy-Confirmed Nonfluent/Agrammatic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Motor speech function, including speech timing, is a key domain for diagnosing nonfluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA). Yet, standard assessments use subjective, specialist-dependent evaluations, undermining reliability and scalability. Moreover, few studies have examined relevant anatomo-clinical alterations in patients with pathologically confirmed diagnoses. This study overcomes such caveats using automated speech timing analyses in a unique cohort of autopsy-proven cases. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we administered an overt reading task and quantified articulation rate, mean syllable and pause duration, and syllable and pause duration variability. Neuroanatomical disruptions were assessed using cortical thickness and white matter (WM) atrophy analysis. RESULTS: We evaluated 22 persons with nfvPPA (mean age: 67.3 years; 13 female patients) and confirmed underlying 4-repeat tauopathy, 15 persons with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA; mean age: 66.5 years; 8 female patients), and 10 healthy controls (HCs; 70 years; 5 female patients). All 5 speech timing measures revealed alterations in persons with nfvPPA relative to both the HC and svPPA groups, controlling for dementia severity. The articulation rate robustly discriminated individuals with nfvPPA from HCs (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.95), outperforming specialist-dependent perceptual measures of dysarthria and apraxia of speech severity. Patients with nfvPPA exhibited structural abnormalities in left precentral and middle frontal as well as bilateral superior frontal regions, including their underlying WM. The articulation rate correlated with atrophy of the left pars opercularis and supplementary/presupplementary motor areas. Secondary analyses showed that, controlling for dementia severity, all measures yielded greater deficits in patients with nfvPPA and corticobasal degeneration (nfvPPA-CBD, n = 12) than in those with progressive supranuclear palsy pathology (nfvPPA-PSP, n = 10). The articulation rate robustly discriminated between individuals in each subgroup (AUC = 0.82). More widespread cortical thinning was observed for the nfvPPA-CBD than the nfvPPA-PSP group across frontal regions. DISCUSSION: Automated speech timing analyses can capture specific markers of nfvPPA while potentially discriminating between patients with different tauopathies. Thanks to its objectivity and scalability; this approach could support standard speech assessments. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that automated speech analysis can accurately differentiate patients with nonfluent PPA from normal controls and patients with semantic variant PPA.

Progressive supranuclear palsy with predominant frontal presentation exhibiting progressive nonfluent aphasia due to crossed aphasia.

Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) with predominant frontal presentation (PSP-F) is a clinical phenotype of PSP that is characterized by frontal cognitive impairment and behavioral changes. Here, we report on a patient with pathologically diagnosed PSP-F in whom we were able to observe temporal changes of the clinical manifestations. A 77-year-old right-handed man developed progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA) at the age of 69 years, festinating gait, and clumsiness of his left arm at age 75, disinhibition at age 76, and unprovoked falls at age 77. Neurological examination at age 77 revealed limb-kinetic apraxia of the left upper and lower limbs, rigidity, cortical sensory loss, and vertical supranuclear gaze palsy. According to the Movement Disorder Society clinical diagnostic criteria for PSP, his clinical manifestations shifted from suggestive PSP with predominant speech/language disorder to probable PSP-F over nine years. Cerebral atrophy on brain magnetic resonance imaging and decreased accumulation of 99m Tc-ECD on cerebral blood flow single-photon emission computed tomography were noted with right side predominance. Pathologically, 4-repeat tau-immunoreactive globose-type neurofibrillary tangles, coiled bodies, tufted astrocytes, and neuropil threads were observed predominantly in the frontal cortex. Tau pathology of the substantia nigra, locus coeruleus and subthalamic nucleus was mild. These findings suggested that localized tau pathology involving the pars opercularis extended to the precentral gyrus, prefrontal cortex, and brainstem. This case report demonstrates that PSP-F can present as a PNFA due to crossed aphasia.

Dysgraphia Phenotypes in Native Chinese Speakers With Primary Progressive Aphasia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Most primary progressive aphasia (PPA) literature is based on English language users. Linguistic features that vary from English, such as logographic writing systems, are underinvestigated. The current study characterized the dysgraphia phenotypes of patients with PPA who write in Chinese and investigated their diagnostic utility in classifying PPA variants. METHODS: This study recruited 40 participants with PPA and 20 cognitively normal participants from San Francisco, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. We measured dictation accuracy using the Chinese Language Assessment for PPA (CLAP) 60-character orthographic dictation test and examined the occurrence of various writing errors across the study groups. We also performed voxel-based morphometry analysis to identify the gray matter regions correlated with dictation accuracy and prevalence of writing errors. RESULTS: All PPA groups produced significantly less accurate writing responses than the control group and no significant differences in dictation accuracy were noted among the PPA variants. With a cut score of 36 out of 60 in the CLAP orthographic dictation task, the test achieved sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 95% in identifying Chinese participants with PPA vs controls. In addition to a character frequency effect, dictation accuracy was affected by homophone density and the number of strokes in semantic variant PPA and logopenic variant PPA groups. Dictation accuracy was correlated with volumetric changes over left ventral temporal cortices, regions known to be critical for orthographic long-term memory. Individuals with semantic variant PPA frequently presented with phonologically plausible errors at lexical level, patients with logopenic variant PPA showed higher preponderance towards visual and stroke errors, and patients with nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA commonly exhibited compound word and radical errors. The prevalence of phonologically plausible, visual, and compound word errors was negatively correlated with cortical volume over the bilateral temporal regions, left temporo-occipital area, and bilateral orbitofrontal gyri, respectively. DISCUSSION: The findings demonstrate the potential role of the orthographic dictation task as a screening tool and PPA classification indicator in Chinese language users. Each PPA variant had specific Chinese dysgraphia phenotypes that vary from those previously reported in English-speaking patients with PPA, highlighting the importance of language diversity in PPA.

Right uncinate fasciculus supports socioemotional sensitivity in health and neurodegenerative disease.

The uncinate fasciculus (UF) connects fronto-insular and temporal gray matter regions involved in visceral emotional reactivity and semantic appraisal, but the precise role of this tract in socioemotional functioning is not well-understood. Using the Revised-Self Monitoring (RSMS) informant questionnaire, we examined whether fractional anisotropy (FA) in the right UF corresponded to socioemotional sensitivity during face-to-face interactions in 145 individuals (40 healthy older adults [NC], and 105 patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration [FTLD] syndromes in whom this tract is selectively vulnerable, including 31 behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia [bvFTD], 39 semantic variant primary progressive aphasia [svPPA], and 35 nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia [nfvPPA]). Voxelwise and region-of-interest-based DWI analyses revealed that FA in the right but not left UF significantly predicted RSMS score in the full sample, and in NC and svPPA subgroups alone. Right UF integrity did not predict RSMS score in the bvFTD group, but gray matter volume in the right orbitofrontal cortex adjacent to the UF was a significant predictor. Our results suggest that better socioemotional sensitivity is specifically supported by right UF white matter, highlighting a key neuro-affective relationship found in both healthy aging and neurologically affected individuals. The finding that poorer socioemotional sensitivity corresponded to right UF damage in svPPA but was more robustly influenced by gray matter atrophy adjacent to the UF in bvFTD may have important implications for endpoint selection in clinical trial design for patients with FTLD.

Pure Prosodic Type of Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech Mimicking Nonfluent Aphasia and Later Progressing to Corticobasal Syndrome.

Primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS), a rare neurodedegenerative disorder, can be subdivided into predominant phonetic or prosodic type. Pure prosodic type of PPAOS as an isolated disorder has been hardly found. We present 2 cases of patients with pure prosodic PPAOS who initially were misdiagnosed as nonfluent variant of primary progressive aphasia and later turned out to be corticobasal syndrome. A 65-year-old woman and a 72-year-old man were referred to our speech-language clinic under the clinical impression of nonfluent variant of primary progressive aphasia. The neurological examinations revealed no definite abnormalities except for slow and effortful speech with the production of simple sentences. However, their receptive and expressive language abilities were normal. Their brain magnetic resonance imaging was unremarkable. We initially entertained the diagnosis of pure prosodic type of PPAOS. During several years of follow up, they gradually developed extrapyramidal symptoms which are compatible with corticobasal syndrome. The characteristics of the patients and the results of neuroimaging studies are discussed.

Utility of the Repeat and Point Test for Subtyping Patients With Primary Progressive Aphasia.

BACKGROUND: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) may present with three distinct clinical sybtypes: semantic variant PPA (svPPA), nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA (nfvPPA), and logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA). OBJECTIVE: The aim was to examine the utility of the German version of the Repeat and Point (R&P) Test for subtyping patients with PPA. METHOD: During the R&P Test, the examiner reads out aloud a noun and the participants are asked to repeat the word and subsequently point to the corresponding picture. Data from 204 patients (68 svPPA, 85 nfvPPA, and 51 lvPPA) and 33 healthy controls were analyzed. RESULTS: Controls completed both tasks with >90% accuracy. Patients with svPPA had high scores in repetition (mean=9.2±1.32) but low scores in pointing (mean=6±2.52). In contrast, patients with nfvPPA and lvPPA performed comparably in both tasks with lower scores in repetition (mean=7.4±2.7 for nfvPPA and 8.2±2.34 for lvPPA) but higher scores in pointing (mean=8.9±1.41 for nfvPPA and 8.6±1.62 for lvPPA). The R&P Test had high accuracy discriminating svPPA from nfvPPA (83% accuracy) and lvPPA (79% accuracy). However, there was low accuracy discriminating nfvPPA from lvPPA (<60%). CONCLUSION: The R&P Test helps to differentiate svPPA from 2 nonsemantic variants (nfvPPA and lvPPA). However, additional tests are required for the differentiation of nfvPPA and lvPPA.