Endocardial repolarization dispersion in BrS: A novel automatic algorithm for mapping activation recovery interval.

INTRODUCTION: Repolarization dispersion in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) contributes to the type-1 electrocardiographic (ECG) phenotype of Brugada syndrome (BrS), while data on the significance and feasibility of mapping repolarization dispersion in BrS patients are scarce. Moreover, the role of endocardial repolarization dispersion in BrS is poorly investigated. We aimed to assess endocardial repolarization patterns through an automated calculation of activation recovery interval (ARI) estimated on unipolar electrograms (UEGs) in spontaneous type-1 BrS patients and controls; we also investigated the relation between ARI and right ventricle activation time (RVAT), and T-wave peak-to-end interval (Tpe) in BrS patients. METHODS: Patients underwent endocardial high-density electroanatomical mapping (HDEAM); BrS showing an overt type-1 ECG were defined as OType1, while those without (latent type-1 ECG and LType1) received ajmaline infusion. BrS patients only underwent programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS). Data were elaborated to obtain ARI corrected with the Bazett formula (ARIc), while RVAT was derived from activation maps. RESULTS: 39 BrS subjects (24 OType1 and 15 LTtype1) and 4 controls were enrolled. OType1 and post-ajmaline LType1 showed longer mean ARIc than controls (306 ± 27.3 ms and 333.3 ± 16.3 ms vs. 281.7 ± 10.3 ms, p = .05 and p < .001, respectively). Ajmaline induced a significant prolongation of ARIc compared to pre-ajmaline LTtype1 (333.3 ± 16.3 vs. 303.4 ± 20.7 ms, p < .001) and OType1 (306 ± 27.3 ms, p < .001). In patients with type-1 ECG (OTtype1 and post-ajmaline LType1) ARIc correlated with RVAT (r = .34, p = .04) and Tpec (r = .60, p < .001), especially in OType1 subjects (r = .55, p = .008 and r = .65 p < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: ARIc mapping demonstrates increased endocardial repolarization dispersion in RVOT in BrS. Endocardial ARIc positively correlates with RVAT and Tpec, especially in OType1.

dST-Tiso Interval, a Novel Electrocardiographic Marker of Ventricular Arrhythmia Inducibility in Individuals With Ajmaline-Induced Brugada Type I Pattern.

The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of a novel electrocardiographic (ECG) marker in predicting ventricular arrhythmia (VA) inducibility in individuals with drug-induced Brugada syndrome (BrS) type I pattern. Consecutive patients with drug-induced type I BrS pattern underwent programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) and, according to their response, were divided into 2 groups. Clinical characteristics and 12-lead ECG intervals before and after ajmaline infusion were compared between the 2 groups. A novel ECG marker named dST-Tiso interval consisting in the interval between the onset of the coved ST-segment elevation and its termination at the isoelectric line was also evaluated. Our cohort included 76 individuals (median age 44 years, 75% male). Twenty-five (32.9%) had VA inducibility requiring defibrillation. As compared with not inducible subjects, those with VA inducibility were more frequently male (92% vs 65%, p = 0.013), had longer PQ interval (basal: 172 vs 152 ms, p = 0.033; after ajmaline: 216 vs 200 ms, p = 0.040), higher J peak (0.6 vs 0.5 mV, p = 0.006) and longer dST-Tiso (360 vs 240 ms, p < 0.001). The dST-Tiso showed a C-statistics of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.82 to 0.99) and an adjusted odds ratio for VA of 1.03 (1.01 to 1.04, p < 0.001). A dST-Tiso interval >300 ms yielded a sensitivity of 92.0%, a specificity of 90.2%, positive and negative predictive values of 82.1% and 95.8%. In conclusion, the dST-Tiso interval is a powerful predictor of VA inducibility in drug-induced BrS type I pattern. External validation is needed, but this marker might be useful in the clinical counseling process of these individuals before invasive PVS.

Coexistence of Brugada and Wolff Parkinson White syndromes: A case report and review of the literature.

A 31-year-old male patient presented with complaints of palpitations, dizziness, and recurrent episodes of syncope. A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed manifest ventricular preexcitation, which suggested Wolff Parkinson White syndrome. In addition, an incomplete right bundle branch block and a 3-mm ST segment elevation ending with inverted T-waves in V2 were consistent with coved-type (type 1) Brugada pattern. An electrophysiological study was performed, and during the mapping, the earliest ventricular activation with the shortest A-V interval was found on the mitral annulus posterolateral site. After successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of the accessory pathway, the Brugada pattern on the ECG changed, which prompted an ajmaline provocation test. A type 1 Brugada ECG pattern occurred following the administration of ajmaline. Considering the probable symptom combinations of these 2 coexisting syndromes and the presence of recurrent episodes of syncope, programmed ventricular stimulation was performed and subsequently, ventricular fibrillation was induced. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted soon after.

Management of untreatable ventricular arrhythmias during pharmacologic challenges with sodium channel blockers for suspected Brugada syndrome.

Pharmacologic challenge with sodium channel blockers is part of the diagnostic workout in patients with suspected Brugada syndrome. The test is overall considered safe but both ajmaline and flecainide detain well known pro-arrhythmic properties. Moreover, the treatment of patients with life-threatening arrhythmias during these diagnostic procedures is not well defined. Current consensus guidelines suggest to adopt cautious protocols interrupting the sodium channel blockers as soon as any ECG alteration appears. Nevertheless, the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias persists, even adopting a safe and cautious protocol and in absence of major arrhythmic risk factors. The authors revise the main published case studies of sodium channel blockers challenge in adults and in children, and summarize three cases of untreatable ventricular arrhythmias discussing their management. In particular, the role of advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation with extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation is stressed as it can reveal to be the only reliable lifesaving facility in prolonged cardiac arrest.

Ablación de arritmias ventriculares en el síndrome de Brugada. Presente y futuro / Ventricular arrhythmias ablation in brugada syndrome. Current and future directions

No disponible

Ajmaline blocks INa and IKr without eliciting differences between Brugada syndrome patient and control human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac clusters.

The class Ia anti-arrhythmic drug ajmaline is used clinically to unmask latent type I ECG in Brugada syndrome (BrS) patients, although its mode of action is poorly characterised. Our aims were to identify ajmaline's mode of action in human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes (CMs), and establish a simple BrS hiPSC platform to test whether differences in ajmaline response could be determined between BrS patients and controls. Control hiPSCs were differentiated into spontaneously contracting cardiac clusters. It was found using multi electrode array (MEA) that ajmaline treatment significantly lengthened cluster activation-recovery interval. Patch clamping of single CMs isolated from clusters revealed that ajmaline can block both INa and IKr. Following generation of hiPSC lines from BrS patients (absent of pathogenic SCN5A sodium channel mutations), analysis of hiPSC-CMs from patients and controls revealed that differentiation and action potential parameters were similar. Comparison of cardiac clusters by MEA showed that ajmaline lengthened activation-recovery interval consistently across all lines. We conclude that ajmaline can block both depolarisation and repolarisation of hiPSC-CMs at the cellular level, but that a more refined integrated tissue model may be necessary to elicit differences in its effect between BrS patients and controls.

ST-Elevation Magnitude Correlates With Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Conduction Delay in Type I Brugada ECG.

BACKGROUND: The substrate location and underlying electrophysiological mechanisms that contribute to the characteristic ECG pattern of Brugada syndrome (BrS) are still debated. Using noninvasive electrocardiographical imaging, we studied whole heart conduction and repolarization patterns during ajmaline challenge in BrS individuals. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 13 participants (mean age, 44±12 years; 8 men), 11 concealed patients with type I BrS and 2 healthy controls, underwent an ajmaline infusion with electrocardiographical imaging and ECG recordings. Electrocardiographical imaging activation recovery intervals and activation timings across the right ventricle (RV) body, outflow tract (RVOT), and left ventricle were calculated and analyzed at baseline and when type I BrS pattern manifested after ajmaline infusion. Peak J-ST point elevation was calculated from the surface ECG and compared with the electrocardiographical imaging-derived parameters at the same time point. After ajmaline infusion, the RVOT had the greatest increase in conduction delay (5.4±2.8 versus 2.0±2.8 versus 1.1±1.6 ms; P=0.007) and activation recovery intervals prolongation (69±32 versus 39±29 versus 21±12 ms; P=0.0005) compared with RV or left ventricle. In controls, there was minimal change in J-ST point elevation, conduction delay, or activation recovery intervals at all sites with ajmaline. In patients with BrS, conduction delay in RVOT, but not RV or left ventricle, correlated to the degree of J-ST point elevation (Pearson R, 0.81; P<0.001). No correlation was found between J-ST point elevation and activation recovery intervals prolongation in the RVOT, RV, or left ventricle. CONCLUSIONS: Magnitude of ST (J point) elevation in the type I BrS pattern is attributed to degree of conduction delay in the RVOT and not prolongation in repolarization time.

Value of the sodium-channel blocker challenge in Brugada syndrome.

AIMS: Intravenous drug challenge is frequently performed to unmask Brugada syndrome (BrS). However, its true sensitivity has never been assessed. We used the obligate BrS transmitters in families affected by BrS to evaluate the true accuracy of drug challenge. METHODS: All consecutive patients from 2000 to 2014 who underwent drug challenge during familial screening for BrS were included in the study. Obligate BrS transmitters were defined as the presence of a descendant and non-descendant first-degree relative affected by BrS. Two physicians blinded to the clinical and genetic status reviewed the data. RESULTS: Among 705 drug challenges performed in 149 families, 50 were performed in obligate transmitters from 42 different families. SCN5A mutations were identified in 20 families. Two obligate transmitters were not carrier of the familial mutation. Based on obligate transmitters, sensitivity was 100% for Ajmaline vs 77% for Flecainide (P=0.002). Based on the presence of the familial SCN5A mutation in all family relatives, sensitivity and specificity of sodium channel blocker challenge were respectively 78% (95/122) and 46% (68/148). During a median follow-up of 91 (26-136) months, 2 ventricular fibrillations occurred in obligate transmitters. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that Ajmaline challenge presents an excellent sensitivity that may rule out the diagnosis of BrS when negative. Conversely, a negative Flecainide challenge may not prevent from Brs inheritance and risk of SCD. This may lead to suggest systematic use of Ajmaline during drug challenge.

Sodium-channel blocker challenge in the familial screening of Brugada syndrome: Safety and predictors of positivity.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-channel blocker challenge (SCBC) is frequently performed to unmask Brugada syndrome. OBJECTIVE: We aim to identify predictors of positivity and complications of SCBC in the setting of familial screening of Brugada syndrome. METHODS: All consecutive patients from 2000 to 2014 who benefit from a sodium-channel blocker and belong to a family with at least 2 subjects affected by the syndrome were enrolled and followed prospectively. Data were reviewed by 2 physicians blinded to the clinical and genetic status. RESULTS: Of the 672 SCBCs performed in 137 families, 337 (50%) were positive. Multivariate analysis identified ajmaline (odds ratio [OR] 2.98; 95% CI 1.65-4.91) and a significant S wave in lead DII (OR 3.11; 95% CI 2.12-4.58), DIII (OR 2.75; 95% CI 1.78-4.25), or V5 (OR 3.71; 95% CI 2.54-5.44) as predictors of a positive SCBC (P < .0001). Eleven patients (1.6%) presented complications (10 ventricular arrhythmias and 1 atrial flutter), but no deaths occurred. Familial history of complications (OR 41; lower quartile, upper quartile 10, 203; P < .0001), young age (P = .04), and decreased electrocardiographic conduction parameters at baseline (P = .04) were predictors of complications. QRS enlargement during SCBC was not associated with complications. During a median follow-up of 106 months (lower quartile, upper quartile 54, 143 months), 11 life-threatening arrhythmias occurred. CONCLUSION: SCBC in the screening of familial Brugada syndrome is safe. The risk of complication is considerably increased in the case of familial history of complicated SCBC, in young patients, and in the presence of decreased electrocardiographic conduction parameters. However, QRS enlargement during the test is not directly related to complications and should not be used to prematurely stop the test unless leading to false-negative results.

Electrical Substrate Elimination in 135 Consecutive Patients With Brugada Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: There is emerging evidence that localization and elimination of abnormal electric activity in the epicardial right ventricular outflow tract may be beneficial in patients with Brugada syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 135 symptomatic Brugada syndrome patients having implantable cardiac defibrillator were enrolled: 63 (group 1) having documented ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) and Brugada syndrome-related symptoms, and 72 (group 2) having inducible VT/VF without ECG documentation at the time of symptoms. About 27 patients of group 1 experienced multiple implantable cardiac defibrillator shocks for recurrent VT/VF episodes. Three-dimensional maps before and after ajmaline determined the arrhythmogenic electrophysiological substrate (AES) as characterized by prolonged fragmented ventricular potentials. Primary end point was identification and elimination of AES leading to ECG pattern normalization and VT/VF noninducibility. Extensive areas of AES were found in the right ventricle epicardium, which were wider in group 1 (P=0.007). AES increased after ajmaline in both groups (P<0.001) and was larger in men (P=0.008). The increase of type-1 ST-segment elevation correlated with AES expansion (r=0.682, P<0.001). Radiofrequency ablation eliminated AES leading to ECG normalization and VT/VF noninducibility in all patients. During a median follow-up of 10 months, the ECG remained normal even after ajmaline in all except 2 patients who underwent a repeated effective procedure for recurrent VF. CONCLUSIONS: In Brugada syndrome, AES is commonly located in the right ventricle epicardium and ajmaline exposes its extent and distribution, which is correlated with the degree of coved ST-elevation. AES elimination by radiofrequency ablation results in ECG normalization and VT/VF noninducibility. Substrate-based ablation is effective in potentially eliminating the arrhythmic consequences of this genetic disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02641431.

Long-term prognosis of drug-induced Brugada syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Patients with drug-induced Brugada syndrome (BS) are considered at a lower risk than those with a spontaneous type I pattern. Nevertheless, they can present arrhythmic events. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate their clinical characteristics, long-term prognosis and risk factors. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 343 patients with drug-induced BS was included and compared with 78 patients with a spontaneous type I pattern. RESULTS: The mean age was 40.7 ± 18.3 years. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) was the clinical presentation in 13 (3.8%) and syncope in 86 (25.1%); 244 (71.1%) were asymptomatic. Patients with drug-induced BS were less frequently men (180 (52.5%) vs 63 (80.8%); P < .01), were more frequently asymptomatic (244 (71.1%) vs 44 (56.4%); P < .01), and had less ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) induced during electrophysiology study (41 (13.2%) vs 31 (42.4%); P < .01). An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted in 128 patients (37.3%). During a median follow-up of 62.5 months (interquartile range 28.9-115.6 months), 34 patients presented arrhythmic events. The event rate was 1.1% person-year (vs 2.3% person-year in patients with a spontaneous type I pattern; P < .01). Presentation as SCD and inducible VAs were independent risk factors significantly associated with arrhythmic events (adjusted hazard ratio 22.0 and 3.5). Drug-induced BS was related to a better prognosis only in asymptomatic individuals. CONCLUSION: Drug-induced BS has a good prognosis if asymptomatic; however, SCD is possible. Clinical presentation as SCD and inducible VAs during electrophysiology study are independent risk factors for arrhythmic events. In asymptomatic patients, proband status and inducible VAs can help to identify patients at higher risk, but further evidence is needed.

Cholestatic hepatitis after diagnostic ajmaline challenge.

We report a cholestatic hepatitis in an elderly woman after ajmaline challenge during electrophysiological testing for Brugada syndrome. No other medication was reported in the previous 6 months of the onset of jaundice. Liver biopsy showed a cholestatic hepatitis with mild biliary damage. Liver enzymes normalized within 2 weeks as well as jaundice. To the best of our knowledge this is the second case of histologically proved cholestatic hepatitis induced by intravenous ajmaline testing.

Yield and Pitfalls of Ajmaline Testing in the Evaluation of Unexplained Cardiac Arrest and Sudden Unexplained Death: Single-Center Experience With 482 Families.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the yield of ajmaline testing and assessed the occurrence of confounding responses in a large cohort of families with unexplained cardiac arrest (UCA) or sudden unexplained death (SUD). BACKGROUND: Ajmaline testing to diagnose Brugada syndrome (BrS) is routinely used in the evaluation of SUD and UCA, but its yield, limitations, and appropriate dosing have not been studied in a large cohort. METHODS: We assessed ajmaline test response and genetic testing results in 637 individuals from 482 families who underwent ajmaline testing for SUD or UCA. RESULTS: Overall, 89 individuals (14%) from 88 families (18%) had a positive ajmaline test result. SCN5A mutations were identified in 9 of 86 ajmaline-positive cases (10%). SCN5A mutation carriers had positive test results at significantly lower ajmaline doses than noncarriers (0.75 [range: 0.64 to 0.98] mg/kg vs. 1.03 [range: 0.95 to 1.14] mg/kg, respectively; p < 0.01). In 7 of 88 families (8%), it was concluded that the positive ajmaline response was a confounder, either in the presence of an alternative genetic diagnosis accounting for UCA/SUD (5 cases) or noncosegregation of positive ajmaline response and arrhythmia (2 cases). The rate of confounding responses was significantly higher in positive ajmaline responses obtained at >1 mg/kg than in those obtained at ≤1 mg/kg (7 of 48 vs. 0 of 41 individuals; Fisher's exact test: p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In line with previous, smaller studies, a positive ajmaline response was observed in a large proportion of UCA/SUD families. Importantly, our data emphasize the potential for confounding possibly false-positive ajmaline responses in this population, particularly at high doses, which could possibly lead to a misdiagnosis. Clinicians should consider all alternative causes in UCA/SUD and avoid ajmaline doses >1 mg/kg.

Systematic ajmaline challenge in patients with long QT 3 syndrome caused by the most common mutation: a multicentre study.

AIMS: Overlap syndromes of long QT 3 syndrome (LQT3) and the Brugada syndrome (BrS) have been reported. Identification of patients with an overlapping phenotype is crucial before initiation of Class I antiarrhythmic drugs for LQT3. Aim of the present study was to elucidate the yield of ajmaline challenge in unmasking the Brugada phenotype in patients with LQT3 caused by the most common mutation, SCN5A-E1784K. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive families in tertiary referral centres diagnosed with LQT3 caused by SCN5A-E1784K were included in the study. Besides routine clinical work-up, ajmaline challenge was performed after informed consent. A total of 23 subjects (11 female, mean age 27 ± 14 years) from 4 unrelated families with a family history of sudden cardiac death and familial diagnosis of the SCN5A-E1784K mutation underwent ajmaline challenge and genetic testing. Sixteen subjects (9 female) were found to be heterozygous carriers of SCN5A-E1784K. Ajmaline challenge was positive in 12 out of the 16 (75%) mutation carriers, but negative in all non-carriers. Following ajmaline, a significant shortening of the rate-corrected JT (JTc) interval was observed in mutation carriers. The baseline JTc interval was significantly longer in mutation carriers with a positive ajmaline challenge compared with those with a negative one. CONCLUSION: Overlap of LQT3 and BrS in patients carrying the most common mutation is high. Therefore, ajmaline challenge represents an important step to rule out potential BrS overlap in these patients before starting sodium channel blockers for the beneficial effect of QT shortening in LQT3.

Pharmacological Provocation of Outflow-Tract Tachycardia in a Patient With Brugada Syndrome.

We present a case of a symptomatic patient with Brugada syndrome, who had sustained right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia after pronounced exercise-induced ST segment elevation in V1 and V2. In electrophysiological study he developed right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia provoked by combined infusion of ajmaline and orciprenaline. After ablation no further arrhythmia was provoked by pharmacological stimulation.

Ventricular arrhythmia during ajmaline challenge for the Brugada syndrome.

The Brugada syndrome is a genetic disease characterized by an abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) and an elevated risk of sudden cardiac death. Sodium channel blockers (SCBs), such as ajmaline, are used to unmask the characteristic type 1 Brugada electrocardiographic pattern. We review the literature on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) during SCB challenge. We evaluate the clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics of these patients as well as their prognosis. All articles published from January 2000 until August 2015, in which the incidence and predictors of VAs during SCB challenge were reported, are reviewed. The occurrence of VA during SCB challenge ranges from 0 to 17.8%. The weighted average for induction of any VA during sodium blocking challenge is 2.4%; for non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), it is 0.34% and for sustained VT 0.59%. No fatal cases were reported. Predictors may be young age, conduction disturbance at baseline ECG, and mutations in the SCN5A gene. All other clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics failed to be consistent predictors. Life-threatening arrhythmias during SCB challenge are not an exceptional event. Therefore, provocation testing must necessarily be performed in an appropriate environment in which advanced life support facilities are present. Patients who have a higher risk for induced arrhythmias might be those who display a conduction disturbance at baseline ECG or have certain SCN5A mutations or are of a younger age. However, survivors of these induced arrhythmias do not seem to suffer from a worse prognosis.

Clinical characterisation and long-term prognosis of women with Brugada syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Brugada syndrome (BS) in women is considered an infrequent condition with a more favourable prognosis than in men. Nevertheless, arrhythmic events and sudden cardiac death (SCD) also occur in this population. Long-term follow-up data of this group are sparse. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis of women with BS. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 228 women presenting with spontaneous or drug-induced Brugada type I ECG at our institution were included and compared with 314 men with the same diagnosis. RESULTS: Mean age was 41.5±17.3 years. Clinical presentation was SCD in 6 (2.6%), syncope in 51 (22.4%) and the remaining 171 (75.0%) were asymptomatic. As compared with men, spontaneous type I ECG was less common (7.9% vs 23.2%, p<0.01) and less ventricular arrhythmias were induced during programmed electrical stimulation (5.5% vs 22.3%, p<0.01). An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was implanted in 64 women (28.1%). During a mean follow-up of 73.2±56.2 months, seven patients developed arrhythmic events, constituting an event rate of 0.7% per year (as compared with 1.9% per year in men, p=0.02). Presentation as SCD or sinus node dysfunction (SND) was risk factor significantly associated with arrhythmic events (hazard risk (HR) 25.4 and 9.1). CONCLUSION: BS is common in women, representing 42% of patients in our database. Clinical presentation is less severe than men, with more asymptomatic status and less spontaneous type I ECG and prognosis is more favourable, with an event rate of 0.7% year. However, women with SCD or previous SND are at higher risk of arrhythmic events.

Unmasked Brugada pattern by ajmaline challenge in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1.

BACKGROUND: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) generates missplicing of the SCN5A gene, encoding the cardiac sodium channel (Nav 1.5). Brugada syndrome, which partly results from Nav 1.5 dysfunction and causes increased VF occurrence, can be unmasked by ajmaline. We aimed to investigate the response to ajmaline challenge in DM1 patients and its potential impact on their sudden cardiac death risk stratification. METHODS: Among 36 adult DM1 patients referred to our institution, electrophysiological study and ajmaline challenge were performed in 12 patients fulfilling the following criteria: (1) PR interval >200 ms or QRS duration >100 ms; (2) absence of complete left bundle branch block; (3) absence of permanent ventricular pacing; (4) absence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD); (5) preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction >50%; and (6) absence of severe muscular impairment. Of note, DM1 patients with ajmaline-induced Brugada pattern (BrP) were screened for SCN5A. RESULTS: In all the 12 patients studied, the HV interval was <70 ms. A BrP was unmasked in three patients but none carried an SCN5A mutation. Ajmaline-induced sustained ventricular tachycardia occurred in one patient with BrP, who finally received an ICD. The other patients did not present any cardiac event during the entire follow-up (15 ± 4 months). CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to describe a high prevalence of ajmaline-induced BrP in DM1 patients. The indications, the safety, and the implications of ajmaline challenge in this particular setting need to be determined by larger prospective studies.

The clinical impact of ajmaline challenge in elderly patients with suspected atrioventricular conduction disease.

BACKGROUND: The effects and the safety of ajmaline challenge in elderly patients with suspected atrioventricular (AV) conduction disease have not been systematically investigated. The purpose of this study was to assess the response of intravenous administration of ajmaline in patients older than 75 years suspected to be affected by AV conduction disease with respect to unmask high-degree His-Purkinje block or the typical Brugada ECG pattern. METHODS: Consecutive patients older than 75 years having undergone in our centre an electrophysiologic study with intravenous ajmaline administration were eligible for this study. RESULTS: A total of 162 consecutive patients older than 75 years (84 males; mean age: 78±4 years) were included. Ajmaline induced prolongation of the H-V interval up to 100 ms or more in 25 patients (15%). High degree His-Purkinje block was produced in 5 patients (3%). Moreover, ajmaline challenge unmasked a Brugada type 1 ECG in 12 patients (7%). No ventricular tachyarrhythmia was observed during the pharmacologic challenge and no severe side effects occurred. Among the study population, 56 (34%) and 6 patients (4%) underwent a PM and ICD implantation, respectively. For the patients with BS, a family screening was performed in a total of 37 individuals. Eighteen family members (48%) presented a positive ajmaline test and 1 (3%) a spontaneous Brugada type 1 ECG. CONCLUSIONS: Ajmaline challenge in the elderly is a safe procedure to unmask AV conduction disease and can lead to an unexpected diagnosis of BS. Although the clinical impact is obvious, the therapeutic management remains controversial.