Pharmacokinetic study of solid-lipid-nanoparticles of altretamine complexed epichlorohydrin-ß-cyclodextrin for enhanced solubility and oral bioavailability.

Altretamine is a synthetic drug approved for treatment of ovarian cancer. The only drawback with its formulation is poor aqueous solubility and low oral bioavailability. In the present work an attempt has been made to prepare inclusion complex of altretamine with epichlorohydrin beta cyclodextrin. The complexes were prepared by kneading, co-evaporation and freeze-drying method and were confirmed by FTIR, XRD, DSC, drug content and dissolution study. Kneaded complex possess maximum solubilizing efficiency of 82.63 in 25mM Epi-ß-CD solution. SLNs of pure altretamine and ALT complexed with Epi-ß-CD were prepared by modified emulsification-ultrasonication method. The particle size and zeta potential was found to be 151.5nm and -21.3mV. The drug release pattern of SLNs was bi-phasic in nature; with an initial burst release followed by sustained drug release. Pharmacokinetic study showed that the average Cmax was found to be 0.94µg/ml, which was 2.47 times higher as compared to the pure drug. The AUCt for SLNs was 150minµgh/ml and 54minµgh/ml for pure ALT suspension which proved that the SLNs exhibited greater absorption compared to the pure drug. Thus, smaller particle size, higher entrapment efficiency and enhanced aqueous solubility led to improvement in oral bioavailability of ALT.

Liposomes incorporating sodium deoxycholate for hexamethylmelamine (HMM) oral delivery: development, characterization, and in vivo evaluation.

Liposomes incorporating sodium deoxycholate (NaDC) were prepared by the method of reverse phase evaporation and used for drug delivery by the oral route. Hexamethylmelamine (HMM), an anti-tumor agent, was chosen as a model drug and encapsulated into liposomes incorporating NaDC (NaDC-Lip). Several properties of NaDC-Lip containing HMM (HMM NaDC-Lip), such as particle size, entrapment efficiency, pinacyanol chloride (PIN) spectral characteristics with various molar ratio of NaDC/PC, as well as the vesicle stability measurements with calcein were evaluated. In vivo, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve obtained from the pharmacokinetics study of HMM NaDC-Lip was found to be approximately 9.76- and 1.21-fold higher than that of HMM solution and HMM Lip, respectively, indicating that NaDC-Lip can be used as a potential carrier for oral drug administration.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of altretamine.

Altretamine (hexamethylmelamine) is an antitumour drug with demonstrated antitumour activity in refractory ovarian cancer. Due to its poor water solubility, the drug has been given by the oral route. In all animal species, including humans, altretamine undergoes oxidative N-demethylation with the formation of hydroxymethyl derivatives as intermediates. Hydroxymethylmelamines are believed to be responsible for the cytotoxic and antitumour activity of the drug. The inter-hand intrapatient variability of the bioavailability of altretamine after oral administration represents an important drawback for effective clinical use of this drug. The variability appears to be mostly related to the first-pass effect and therefore may be overcome by intravenous administration of the drug. Although attempts to administer the drug intravenously have not been successful in the past, some investigations on the use of the new parental formulation of altretamine are in progress.

Altretamine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in cancer chemotherapy.

Altretamine (hexamethylmelamine) is a cytotoxic antineoplastic agent which appears to require metabolic activation. Metabolic intermediates may act as alkylating agents; however, altretamine is not directly cross-resistant with classical alkylating agents. Objective response rates to orally administered altretamine as salvage therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer were 0 to 33%, with disease stabilisation in a further 8 to 78% of patients. Response rates appear to be higher in patients who have responded to previous alkylating agent or cisplatin-based therapy. There is some evidence that addition of altretamine to platinum-based combination regimens used for induction therapy of advanced ovarian cancer may improve long term survival, particularly in patients with limited residual disease. Although altretamine displays some activity in small cell lung cancer, it is unlikely to have any clinical role in the management of non-ovarian cancer. Altretamine appears to be relatively well tolerated, with gastrointestinal, neurological and haematological toxicities being the main dose-limiting adverse effects. However, assessment of accurate incidence rates for these effects is complicated by the use of altretamine with cisplatin. On the basis of the emerging body of clinical evidence, altretamine appears to have a limited role in the treatment of persistent or recurrent advanced ovarian cancer, primarily in patients who are potentially platinum sensitive yet intolerant of platinum analogues. Additionally, altretamine may be added to platinum-based regimens for induction therapy of advanced ovarian cancer. At the doses currently recommended, altretamine offers a reasonably well tolerated regimen that can be administered orally and is suitable for use on an outpatient basis.

Altretamine.

Altretamine is a National Cancer Institute-designated group C antineoplastic agent used in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Altretamine is a highly lipid-soluble drug available only for oral administration as a capsule. The drug is activated through metabolic oxidation to intermediate methylol derivatives and formaldehyde. It is unclear which metabolite is the major species responsible for cytotoxicity or the primary mechanism of cytotoxicity. As a single agent in the treatment of ovarian cancer, altretamine demonstrates a response rate similar to other active agents in this disease (21-39 percent). The major utility of altretamine is in combination with other agents such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil, melphalan, and cisplatin. However, few randomized trials have evaluated the contribution of altretamine in these multiagent combinations. Dose-limiting toxicities include gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting, anorexia), hematologic, and neurotoxic (peripheral neurotoxicity). The therapeutic role of altretamine is limited because of a toxicity profile similar to that of cisplatin, one of the more active agents in ovarian cancer. Its use should be reserved for patients who are not candidates for more standard platinum-based regimens.

Phase I and clinical pharmacological evaluation of a parenteral hexamethylmelamine formulation.

Hexamethylmelamine has been evaluated in single agent and combination regimen studies for many years, but only following p.o. administration. Pharmacological studies in animals and humans have shown that systematic availability of parent drug following p.o. administration is relatively low and variable due to extensive first-pass metabolism rather than due to poor absorption. Two Phase I clinical trials, with accompanying pharmacokinetic studies, have been conducted by using a parenteral formulation in which hexamethylmelamine was prepared by Intralipid 10%. The parenteral formulation was well tolerated by all patients receiving hexamethylmelamine by 1-day and by daily for 5-days schedules. Nausea and vomiting were the dose-limiting toxicities. Maximally tolerated doses on the 1-day and daily for 5-days schedules were approximately 850 mg/m2 and 630 mg/m2/day, respectively. No responses were observed in either study. Following i.v. administration of 540 mg/m2 hexamethylmelamine, plasma elimination was best described by a three-compartment open model with terminal half-life, total body clearance, and steady-state volume of distribution values of 10.4 h, 0.75 liter/min/m2 and 460 liters/m2, respectively. Twenty-four h urinary recoveries of parent drug were less than 1% for all patients. Accumulation of hexamethylmelamine during the 5-day treatment at 945 mg/m2 suggested possible saturation of parent drug elimination at that dose. Phase II studies are currently under way with the parenteral formulation of hexamethylmelamine.

The bioavailability of three altretamine formulations.

The bioavailability of two altretamine preparations was studied in a randomized cross-over design. The two preparations were compared with a third in a parallel design. Dissolution differences between the preparations were observed, which could give rise to differences in bioavailability caused by the extensive first-pass effect of altretamine. The in vivo data showed a trend to differences in bioavailability.

Tumor pharmacokinetics of hexamethylmelamine in CDF1 mice bearing P388 leukemia.

The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of hexamethylmelamine (HMM) have been studied in CDF1, mice bearing P388 leukemia. The results obtained for this tumor, which is naturally resistant to HMM, were compared with data on HMM sensitive RC tumor and plasma. The pharmacokinetic parameters, estimated by an original algorithm (FADHA), indicated that HMM Cmax and AUC were very high in RC and P388 tumors as compared to plasma values, but could not be directly correlated with HMM activity. Hydroxymethylpentamethylmelamine (HMPMM), a potentially anticancer metabolite of HMM, was easily detected in P388 leukemia while very poorly detected in RC tissue. This finding led us to make the hypothesis that HMM activity could correlate with HMPMM ability to interact irreversibly with DNA and proteins in tumors.

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of hexamethylmelamine in mice bearing renal cell tumors.

The pharmacokinetics of hexamethylmelamine (HMM) and its main metabolites hydroxymethylpentamethylmelamine (HMPMM), pentamethylmelamine (PMM), and 2,2,4,6, tetramethylmelamine (2,2,4,6 TetrMM) were studied in renal cell (RC) tumor tissues and plasma of CDF1 mice that had received IP bolus injections of the maximally tolerated dose (200 mg/kg) of HMM. HMM, PMM, and 2,2,4,6 TetrMM concentrations determined in RC tissues were much higher than the plasma values, as indicated by the pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax and AUC). On the other hand, very low levels of HMPMM, generally considered to be a potentially active antitumor compound, were detected in the target tissues, whereas this hydroxylated metabolite was stable and easily determined in plasma. High HMM concentrations in RC tissues could correlate with the high sensitivity of the tumor to this drug. However, the behavior of HMPMM remains unclear; related hypotheses are presented in this paper.