The Anesthesia Workstation: Quo Vadis?

Ensuring adequate ventilation and oxygenation and delivering inhaled anesthetic agent to the patient remain core responsibilities of the anesthesia provider during general anesthesia. Because of the emphasis placed on physiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, and administrative duties, the stellar anesthesia workstation technology may be underutilized by the anesthesia community. Target-controlled O2 and agent delivery and automated end-expired CO2 control have entered the clinical arena, with only cost, luddism, and administrative hurdles preventing their more widespread use. This narrative review will explain technological aspects of existing and recently introduced anesthesia workstations. Concepts rather than particular anesthesia machines will be addressed, but examples will mostly pertain to the more recently introduced workstations. The anesthesia workstation consists of a ventilator, a carrier gas and agent delivery system, a scavenging system, and monitors. Mainly, the circle breathing circuit configuration, ventilator, and carrier gas and agent delivery technology are discussed. Occasionally, technical details are provided to give the reader a taste of the modern technology.

Inhaled anaesthetics and nitrous oxide: Complexities overlooked: things may not be what they seem.

This review re-examines existing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic concepts of inhaled anaesthetics. After showing where uptake is hidden in the classic FA/FI curve, it is argued that target-controlled delivery of inhaled agents warrants a different interpretation of the factors affecting this curve (cardiac output, ventilation and blood/gas partition coefficient). Blood/gas partition coefficients of modern agents may be less important clinically than generally assumed. The partial pressure cascade from delivered to inspired to end-expired is re-examined to better understand the effect of rebreathing during low-flow anaesthesia, including the possibility of developing a hypoxic inspired mixture despite existing machine standards. Inhaled agents are easy to administer because they are transferred according to partial pressure gradients. In addition, the narrow dose-response curves for the three end points of general anaesthesia (loss of response to verbal command, immobility and autonomic reflex control) allow the clinical use of MACawake, MAC and MACBAR to determine depth of anaesthesia. Opioids differentially affect these clinical effects of inhaled agents. The effect of ventilation-perfusion relationships on gas uptake is discussed, and it is shown how moving beyond Riley's useful but simplistic model allows us to better understand both the concept and the magnitude of the second gas effect of nitrous oxide. It is argued that nitrous oxide remains a clinically useful drug. We hope to bring old (but ignored) and new (but potentially overlooked) information into the educational and clinical arenas to stimulate discussion among clinicians and researchers. We should not let technology pass by our all too engrained older concepts.

Pulmonary carbon dioxide elimination for cardiac output monitoring in peri-operative and critical care patients: history and current status.

Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output as a central component of advanced haemodynamic monitoring has been increasingly recognised as a potential means of improving perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing major surgery. Methods based upon pulmonary carbon dioxide elimination are among the oldest techniques in this field, with comparable accuracy and precision to other techniques. Modern adaptations of these techniques suitable for use in the perioperative and critical are environment are based on the differential Fick approach, and include the partial carbon dioxide rebreathing method. The accuracy and precision of this approach to cardiac output measurement has been shown to be similar to other minimally invasive techniques. This paper reviews the underlying principles and evolution of the method, and future directions including recent adaptations designed to deliver continuous breath-by-breath monitoring of cardiac output.

Changing patterns in anesthetic fresh gas flow rates over 5 years in a teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: Reducing anesthetic fresh gas flows can reduce volatile anesthetic consumption without affecting drug delivery to the patient. Delivery systems with electronic flow transducers permit the simple and accurate collection of fresh gas flow information. In a 2001 audit of fresh gas flow, we found little response to interventions designed to foster more efficient use of fresh gas. We compared current practice with our earlier results. METHODS: Flow data were collected in areas with a mix of general and acute surgery in March and November 2001, and again during 2006, by recording directly from the Datex ADU to a computer every 10 s. We extracted the distribution of flow rates when a volatile anesthetic was being administered. Data collection in March 2001 and 2006 was not advertised. RESULTS: In 2001, the mean flow rates were 1.95 and 2.1 L/min with a median flow of 1.5 L/min. In 2006, the mean was 1.27 and the median in the range 0.5-1.0 L/min. Isoflurane use decreased from 47% in 2001 to 4% in 2006. CONCLUSIONS: Fresh gas flows used in our department have decreased by 35% over 4 years. Although the absolute change in flow rate is not large, this represents potential annual savings of more than $US130,000. This occurred without specific initiatives, suggesting an evolution in practice towards lower fresh gas flow. Improvements in equipment and monitoring, including a locally developed system, which displays forward predictions of end-tidal and effect-site vapor concentrations, may be factors in this change.

Increase in the use of rebreathing gas flow systems and in the utilization of low fresh gas flows in Finnish anaesthetic practice from 1995 to 2002.

BACKGROUND: The use of rebreathing systems together with low fresh gas flows saves anaesthetic gases, reduces the costs of anaesthesia, causes less environmental and ergonomic adverse effects, i.e. less air contamination in the operating room, and has favourable physiological effects. We assessed whether the use of non-rebreathing vs. rebreathing gas flow systems and high vs. lower fresh gas flows has changed during recent years. METHODS: The use of rebreathing and non-rebreathing systems and the utilization of fresh gas flows were evaluated by sending a questionnaire to the heads of anaesthesia departments at all public health care hospitals in Finland in 1996 and 2003. The data was gathered from the previous years 1995 and 2002, respectively. RESULTS: The use of rebreathing systems increased from 62% to 83% of all instances of general anaesthesia (P < 0.001). In rebreathing gas flow systems, there was a significant shift from high fresh gas flows (3 l min(-1) and more) towards lower fresh gas flows (between 1 to 2 l min(-1) and even below 1 l min(-1)) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of low fresh gas flows have now been achieved in most instances of rebreathing system anaesthesia, which was not the case in 1995.

Priming of anesthesia circuit with xenon for closed circuit anesthesia.

Xenon is an inert gas with a practical anesthetic potency (1 MAC = 71%). Because it is very expensive, the use of closed circuit anesthesia technique is ideal for the conduction of xenon anesthesia. Here we describe our methods of starting closed circuit anesthesia without excessive waste of xenon gas. We induce anesthesia with intravenous agents, and after endotracheal intubation, denitrogenate the patient for approximately 30 min with a high flow of oxygen. This is done to minimize accumulation of nitrogen in the anesthesia circuit during the subsequent closed-circuit anesthesia with xenon. Anesthesia is maintained with an inhalational anesthetic during this period. Then, we discontinue the inhalation agent and start xenon. For this transition, we feel it is unacceptable to simply administer xenon at a high flow until the desired end-tidal concentration is reached because it is too costly. Instead we set up another machine with its circuit filled in advance (i.e., primed) with at least 60% xenon in oxygen and switch the patient to this machine. To prime the circuit, we push xenon using a large syringe into a circuit, which was prefilled with oxygen. Oxygen inside the circuit is pushed out before it is mixed with xenon, and xenon waste will thus be minimized. In this way, we can achieve close to 1 MAC from the beginning of xenon anesthesia, and thereby minimize the risk of light anesthesia and awareness during transition from denitrogenation to closed-circuit xenon anesthesia.

[Closed circuit anesthesia: its foundation and application].

The basic theory of closed circuit anesthesia (CCA) was founded by Dr. H Lowe in 1970's. The introductory textbook he and his colleague wrote was published in 1981, which, surprisingly, has not been revised since then. Furthermore, there are no other monographs on this subject, reflecting a decline in the interest of many anesthesiologists in CCA. However, CCA has been drawing more and more attention recently because of the introduction of new and expensive inhalational anesthetics and growing concern over environmental pollution. In this review, we aimed at explaining the basis on which how Dr. Lowe derived his original theory of CCA called square root method, and what limitations this theory has in applying CCA to our clinical practice. Then, we proposed a practical modification of Lowe's approach, introducing a statistical method called "Bayesian updating" to predict a changing variables during anesthesia. We conclude this review by discussing future perspective of CCA, taking Xenon as an example of an ideal anesthetic agent that may be introduced into our clinical practice in the near future.

[Closed circuit anesthesia: a perspective in clinical practice].

"Care for the Earth" is a topic which everyone on this planet has to keep in mind, and anesthesiologist is no exception. More and more emphasis has been placed on minimization of air pollution. This inevitably influences our daily practice of anesthesia since many gaseous and volatile anesthetics are air pollutants. It is, therefore, high time to review closed circuit anesthesia (CCA), because CCA produces minimal (or, by definition, no) waste of anesthetics. Based on our extensive experience since 1977, we believe that CCA is not only safe to perform but also easy to learn once the differences and similarities between CCA and semi-closed circuit anesthesia (SCA) are clearly understood. This review focuses on fundamental principles of CCA with emphasis on some new concepts on how anesthesiologists control the depth of anesthesia during CCA and SCA. We hope these concepts help the readers overcome the traditional but unfounded impression that CCA is a highly specialized mode of anesthesia.