Pimavanserin for negative symptoms of schizophrenia: results from the ADVANCE phase 2 randomised, placebo-controlled trial in North America and Europe.

BACKGROUND: Negative symptoms of schizophrenia are associated with adverse clinical outcomes, but there are few effective treatments. We aimed to assess the effects of pimavanserin, a selective 5-HT2A inverse agonist and antagonist, on negative symptoms of schizophrenia. METHODS: The ADVANCE study was a phase 2, 26-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of pimavanserin in stable outpatients with schizophrenia aged 18-55 years with predominant negative symptoms. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) across 83 sites (18 in North America and 65 in Europe) to receive pimavanserin or placebo daily, added to an ongoing antipsychotic medication, per a computer-generated schedule (stratification by geographical region). Eligible patients had a score of at least 20 on the sum of seven Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder negative factor items (and scores of ≥4 on at least three or ≥5 on at least two of negative symptom items). The starting dosage of 20 mg of pimavanserin or placebo could be adjusted to 34 mg or 10 mg within the first 8 weeks of the study, after which dosage remained stable until the end of the study. Both pimavanserin and placebo were administered orally once daily as two individual tablets (pimavanserin tablets were either 10 mg or 17 mg). The primary endpoint was change in total score using the 16-item Negative Symptom Assessment (NSA-16) from baseline to week 26. Primary outcomes were analysed in patients who received at least one dose of the study drug and had NSA-16 assessments at baseline and at least once post-baseline (full analysis set). Safety outcomes were analysed in patients who had received at least one dose of the study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02970305, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Nov 4, 2016, and April 16, 2019, we randomly assigned 403 patients to pimavanserin (n=201; 131 [65%] male; 187 [93%] White) or placebo (n=202; 137 [68%] male, 186 (92%) White), of whom 400 were included in the efficacy analysis (199 in the pimavanserin group, 201 in the placebo group). Mean age was 37·7 years (SD 9·4) in the pimavanserin group and 36·7 (9·2) years in the placebo group. The change in total NSA-16 score from baseline to week 26 was significantly improved with pimavanserin (least squares mean -10·4 [SE 0·67]) versus placebo (least squares mean -8·5 [0·67]; p=0·043; effect size: 0·211). The number of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar between groups: 80 (40%) patients experienced TEAEs in the pimavanserin group and 71 (35%) in the placebo group. Most TEAEs were headache (6% [n=13] vs 5% [n=10]) and somnolence (5% [n=11] vs 5% [n=10]). One patient from the placebo group reported severe headache (0·5%), rhinorrhoea (0·5%), cough (0·5%), and influenza (0·5%). In the pimavanserin group, one patient reported severe toothache (0·5%), and two patients had worsening of schizophrenia (1%). Mean change in QTcF interval was higher with pimavanerin (4·5 ms [SD 18·0]) than with placebo (0·0 ms [16·0]). INTERPRETATION: Stable patients with predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia showed a reduction in negative symptoms after treatment with pimavanserin. However, given the small effect size, further investigation with optimised dosing is warranted to determine the clinical significance of this effect. FUNDING: Acadia Pharmaceuticals.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MT-1207, a novel multitarget blocker of α1 receptor, 5-HT2A receptor, and calcium channel, in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: MT-1207 is a novel multitarget blocker of α1 receptor, 5-HT2A receptor, and calcium channel that is currently under development for the treatment of hypertension. In this study, we evaluated the tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of MT-1207 in healthy Chinese subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined the effects of a single-ascending dose (SAD) of MT-1207 (5-40 mg) and MT-1207 (40 mg) administered in combination with food in 56 healthy subjects. RESULTS: No serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events (related to MT-1207) occurred in either study. MT-1207 was rapidly absorbed (median Tmax: 0.5-1.25 h). The mean t1/2 of MT-1207 was approximately 4-7 hours. Systemic exposure (Cmax and AUC) to MT-1207 increased in proportion to dose. Food had little effect on the pharmacokinetics of MT-1207, such as t1/2 and AUC. For 4h-24 h after administration, the blood pressure reduction in the MT-1207 group was higher than that in the placebo group, showing the antihypertensive effect. Blood pressure reduction after MT-1207 administration showed some dose-dependent trend in the 5-20 mg groups. CONCLUSIONS: MT-1207 was well tolerated in all subjects. PD measurements demonstrated the antihypertensive effects of MT-1207.

Antiplatelet Effect of Mirtazapine via Co-blocking of the 5-HT2A and α2-Adrenergic Receptors on Platelets.

Mirtazapine (MTZ) is a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant. MTZ is reportedly associated with an increased risk of bleeding. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the antiplatelet effect of MTZ in mice via light transmission aggregometry to elucidate the mechanism of MTZ-induced bleeding. The results of the ex vivo study showed that the oral administration of MTZ (20 or 100 mg/kg) significantly suppressed platelet aggregation mediated by the synergic interaction of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and adrenaline. Additionally, MTZ significantly suppressed platelet aggregation, mediated by the synergic interaction of ADP and 5-HT or adrenaline. Similar results were obtained in vitro, under the condition of 5-HT- and adrenaline-induced platelet aggregation. Overall, the results suggest that MTZ exerts antiplatelet effect by co-blocking 5-HT2A and α2-adrenergic receptors on platelets and suppresses platelet aggregation mediated by ADP, increased by either 5-HT or adrenaline. Thus, a detailed monitoring of bleeding is recommended for patients taking MTZ.

An Open-Label, 8-Week Study of Safety and Efficacy of Pimavanserin Treatment in Adults with Parkinson's Disease and Depression.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience depression. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate pimavanserin treatment for depression in patients with PD. METHODS: Pimavanserin was administered as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor in this 8-week, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study (NCT03482882). The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 8 in Hamilton Depression Scale-17-item version (HAMD-17) score. Safety, including collection of adverse events and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (MDS-UPDRS III) scores, was assessed in patients who received ≥1 pimavanserin dose. RESULTS: Efficacy was evaluated in 45 patients (21 monotherapy, 24 adjunctive therapy). Mean (SE) baseline HAMD-17 was 19.2 (3.1). Change from baseline to week 8 (least squares [LS] mean [SE]) in the HAMD-17 was -10.8 (0.63) (95% CI, -12.0 to -9.5; p < 0.0001) with significant improvement seen at week 2 (p < 0.0001) and for both monotherapy (week 8, -11.2 [0.99]) and adjunctive therapy (week 8,-10.2 [0.78]). Most patients (60.0%) had ≥50% improvement at week 8, and 44.4% of patients reached remission (HAMD-17 score ≤7). Twenty-one of 47 patients experienced 42 treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common by system organ class were gastrointestinal (n = 7; 14.9%) and psychiatric (n = 7; 14.9%). No negative effects were observed on MMSE or MDS-UPDRS Part III. CONCLUSION: In this 8-week, single-arm, open-label study, pimavanserin as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy was well tolerated and associated with early and sustained improvement of depressive symptoms in patients with PD.

Blinded SAPS-PD Assessment After 10 Weeks of Pimavanserin Treatment for Parkinson's Disease Psychosis.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP) is a common nonmotor symptom that affects up to 60% of patients. Pimavanserin, a selective 5-HT2A inverse agonist/antagonist, is approved for treating hallucinations and delusions associated with PDP. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of pimavanserin in an open-label extension (OLE) study. METHODS: Patients completing a pivotal 6-week placebo-controlled trial (Core Study) could enroll in the OLE. All patients pimavanserin 34 mg once daily, blinded to previous treatment allocation. Prespecified blinded assessments at Week 4 were the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) PD version and SAPS H + D scales, Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Improvement and Severity scales. RESULTS: Of 171 who entered the OLE, 148 (87%) completed Week 4. Among patients who received placebo in the Core Study, mean (SD) change from OLE baseline to OLE Week 4 for the SAPS-PD was - 3.4 (6.3); p < 0.0001. Mean change from Core Study baseline to OLE Week 4 for SAPS-PD was similar among prior pimavanserin- and placebo-treated patients (-6.9 vs. -6.3). Improvement was similar with CGI-I, CGI-S, CBS, and SAPS-H + D in patients previously treated with placebo. Adverse events occurred in 92 (53.8%) patients during the 4-week OLE. CONCLUSION: Improvements at OLE Week 4 from pretreatment baseline were similar with placebo and pimavanserin in the Core Study. The beneficial effects observed with pimavanserin in the 6-week Core Study were maintained for 4 weeks in the blinded OLE, supporting the durability of response with pimavanserin 34 mg for PDP over 10 weeks.

Putative role of pharmacogenetics to elucidate the mechanism of tardive dyskinesia in schizophrenia.

Identifying biomarkers which can be used as a diagnostic tool is a major objective of pharmacogenetic studies. Most mental and many neurological disorders have a compiled multifaceted nature, which may be the reason why this endeavor has hitherto not been very successful. This is also true for tardive dyskinesia (TD), an involuntary movement complication of long-term treatment with antipsychotic drugs. The observed associations of specific gene variants with the prevalence and severity of a disorder can also be applied to try to elucidate the pathogenesis of the condition. In this paper, this strategy is used by combining pharmacogenetic knowledge with theories on the possible role of a dysfunction of specific cellular elements of neostriatal parts of the (dorsal) extrapyramidal circuits: various glutamatergic terminals, medium spiny neurons, striatal interneurons and ascending monoaminergic fibers. A peculiar finding is that genetic variants which would be expected to increase the neostriatal dopamine concentration are not associated with the prevalence and severity of TD. Moreover, modifying the sensitivity to glutamatergic long-term potentiation (and excitotoxicity) shows a relationship with levodopa-induced dyskinesia, but not with TD. Contrasting this, TD is associated with genetic variants that modify vulnerability to oxidative stress. Reducing the oxidative stress burden of medium spiny neurons may also be the mechanism behind the protective influence of 5-HT2 receptor antagonists. It is probably worthwhile to discriminate between neostriatal matrix and striosomal compartments when studying the mechanism of TD and between orofacial and limb-truncal components in epidemiological studies.

Pimavanserin in Alzheimer's Disease Psychosis: Efficacy in Patients with More Pronounced Psychotic Symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Pimavanserin is a 5-HT2A receptor inverse agonist/antagonist and is approved in the United States for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy of pimavanserin on symptoms of psychosis in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Nursing home residents. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with AD psychosis. INTERVENTIONS: Pimavanserin 34 mg or placebo daily for 12 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline at Week 6 on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home Version psychosis score (NPI-NH-PS). In the prespecified subgroup analysis, the mean change in NPI-NH-PS and the responder rates among those with baseline NPI-NH-PS ≥12 were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 181 patients randomized (n=90 pimavanserin; n=91 placebo), 57 had baseline NPI-NH-PS ≥12 (n=27 pimavanserin; n=30 placebo). In this severe subgroup, large treatment effects were observed (delta=-4.43, Cohen's d=-0.73, p=0.011), and ≥30% improvement was 88.9% vs. 43.3% (p<0.001) and ≥50% improvement was 77.8% vs. 43.3% (p=0.008) for pimavanserin and placebo, respectively. The rate of adverse events (AEs) in the severe subgroup was similar between treatment groups, and urinary tract infection, fall, and agitation were most frequent. Serious AEs was similar with pimavanserin (17.9%) and placebo (16.7%) with fewer discontinuations due to AEs with pimavanserin (7.1%) compared to placebo (10.0%). Minimal change from baseline occurred for the mean MMSE score over 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Pimavanserin demonstrated significant efficacy in AD psychosis in patients with higher baseline severity of psychotic symptoms (NPI-NH-PS ≥12). Treatment with pimavanserin showed an acceptable tolerability profile.

Guidance for switching from off-label antipsychotics to pimavanserin for Parkinson's disease psychosis: an expert consensus.

Patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP) are often treated with an atypical antipsychotic, especially quetiapine or clozapine, but side effects, lack of sufficient efficacy, or both may motivate a switch to pimavanserin, the first medication approved for management of PDP. How best to implement a switch to pimavanserin has not been clear, as there are no controlled trials or case series in the literature to provide guidance. An abrupt switch may interrupt partially effective treatment or potentially trigger rebound effects from antipsychotic withdrawal, whereas cross-taper involves potential drug interactions. A panel of experts drew from published data, their experience treating PDP, lessons from switching antipsychotic drugs in other populations, and the pharmacology of the relevant drugs, to establish consensus recommendations. The panel concluded that patients with PDP can be safely and effectively switched from atypical antipsychotics used off label in PDP to the recently approved pimavanserin by considering each agent's pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, receptor interactions, and the clinical reason for switching (efficacy or adverse events). Final recommendations are that such a switch should aim to maintain adequate 5-HT2A antagonism during the switch, thus providing a stable transition so that efficacy is maintained. Specifically, the consensus recommendation is to add pimavanserin at the full recommended daily dose (34 mg) for 2-6 weeks in most patients before beginning to taper and discontinue quetiapine or clozapine over several days to weeks. Further details are provided for this recommendation, as well as for special clinical circumstances where switching may need to proceed more rapidly.

Effects of Flibanserin on the Pharmacokinetics of a Combined Ethinylestradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Premenopausal Women: A Randomized Crossover Study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of steady-state exposure to flibanserin, a 5-HT1A agonist/5-HT2A antagonist approved for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women, on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of the contraceptive steroids ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel in healthy premenopausal women. METHODS: Healthy female volunteers (N = 24) received 2 single doses of a combined oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol 30 µg and levonorgestrel 150 µg, either alone (reference) or preceded by treatment with flibanserin 100 mg once daily for 14 days (test). The 2 treatments were given in randomized order, with a 4-week washout period following the last administration of the first treatment. Plasma concentrations of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel were measured over 48 hours after dosing for the determination of pharmacokinetic parameters; the primary end points were Cmax and AUC0-∞ of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel. FINDINGS: Of the 24 women enrolled (mean age, 38.0 years), 23 completed the study. Mean (SD) Cmax and AUC0-∞ values of ethinylestradiol were 66.7 (16.3) pg/mL and 693 (268) pg · h/mL, respectively, following the oral contraceptive alone, and 72.7 (25.5) pg/mL and 740 (235) pg · h/mL, respectively, when the oral contraceptive was preceded by flibanserin. In both cases, the 90% CIs of the reference/test ratios of Cmax and AUC0-∞ were within the range of 80% to 125%, indicating that flibanserin had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetic properties of ethinylestradiol. Similarly, the mean (SD) Cmax and AUC0-∞ values of levonorgestrel were 5.0 (1.6) ng/mL and 52.2 (18.7) ng · h/mL, respectively, with the oral contraceptive alone, and 5.0 (1.6) ng/mL and 53.3 (20.4) ng · h/mL, respectively, following flibanserin; again, in both cases, the 90% CIs of the reference/test ratios were within the range of 80% to 125%, indicating that flibanserin had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetic properties of levonorgestrel. All adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity (incidence: 12.5% and 70.8% with ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel treatment alone and following administration of flibanserin, respectively). IMPLICATIONS: Pretreatment with flibanserin 100 mg once daily for 2 weeks did not produce a clinically relevant change in oral contraceptive drug exposure following single-dose administration of ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel. This finding is relevant to women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder who might prefer oral contraceptives to other forms of birth control. EudraCT No: 2006-006960-46.

Pimavanserin for the treatment of Parkinson's disease psychosis: number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to describe the efficacy and tolerability of pimavanserin, a highly selective serotonin 5-HT2A receptor inverse agonist/antagonist indicated for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP), using the metrics of number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH). METHODS: Categorical efficacy and tolerability data were extracted from the clinical trial databases of the double-blind placebo-controlled studies of pimavanserin in persons with PDP. NNT and NNH values were calculated with their respective 95% confidence intervals. The likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH) was then calculated contrasting therapeutic response versus discontinuation because of an adverse event. RESULTS: NNT values for pimavanserin 34 mg/d versus placebo for several definitions of clinical response are 10, and/or are not statistically significant, and/or show an advantage for pimavanserin over placebo (such as for postural hypotension). In terms of LHH, pimavanserin 34 mg/d is about five times more likely to result in clinical response (as measured by a ≥3 point decrease from baseline on the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms adapted for Parkinson's disease) versus discontinuation due to an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Using the metrics of NNT, NNH, and LHH, pimavanserin 34 mg/d for the treatment of PDP appears to have a compelling benefit/risk profile.

Decreased 5-HT2cR and GHSR1a interaction in antipsychotic drug-induced obesity.

Second generation antipsychotics (SGAs), notably atypical antipsychotics including olanzapine, clozapine and risperidone, can cause weight gain and obesity side effects. Antagonism of serotonin 2c receptors (5-HT2cR) and activation of ghrelin receptor type 1a (GHSR1a) signalling have been identified as a main cause of SGA induced obesity. Here we review the pivotal regulatory role of the 5-HT2cR in ghrelin-mediated appetite signalling. The 5-HT2cR dimerizes with GHSR1a to inhibit orexigenic signalling, while 5-HT2cR antagonism reduces dimerization and increases GHSR1a-induced food intake. Dimerization is specific to the unedited 5-HT2cR isoform. 5-HT2cR antagonism by SGAs may disrupt the normal inhibitory tone on the GHSR1a, increasing orexigenic signalling. The 5-HT2cR and its interaction with the GHSR1a could serve as the basis for discovering novel approaches to preventing and treating SGA-induced obesity.

Effect of Flibanserin Treatment on Body Weight in Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women with Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder: A Post Hoc Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Flibanserin, a 5-HT1A agonist and 5-HT2A antagonist, is indicated for the treatment of acquired, generalized hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in premenopausal women. This post hoc analysis evaluated the effect of flibanserin treatment on body weight in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with HSDD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This analysis included three 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of flibanserin 100 mg each bedtime (qhs) in premenopausal women, a similarly designed study in postmenopausal women, and a 52-week, open-label extension study in premenopausal women. RESULTS: In a pooled analysis of premenopausal women, mean baseline body mass index (BMI) was 27.0 kg/m2 in the flibanserin group (n = 1227) and 26.8 kg/m2 in the placebo group (n = 1238). Among patients who completed 24 weeks of treatment, least squares (LS) mean weight change was -1.4 kg in the flibanserin group (n = 1010) and -0.1 kg in the placebo group (n = 1066; p < 0.0001). Weight loss ≥5% from baseline was reported in 21.0% of patients who received flibanserin and 7.8% of patients who received placebo; weight loss ≥10% was reported in 3.8% and 2.0% of patients, respectively. In postmenopausal women, mean baseline BMI was 27.7 kg/m2 in the flibanserin group (n = 467) and 27.3 kg/m2 in the placebo group (n = 480). LS mean weight change at week 24 was -1.8 kg in the flibanserin group (n = 385) and -0.1 kg in the placebo group (n = 425; p < 0.0001), with weight loss ≥5% reported in 24.7% and 7.3% of patients, respectively, and weight loss ≥10% reported in 5.2% and 1.7%, respectively. In HSDD patients with >12 months (n = 880) and >18 months (n = 637) of exposure to flibanserin, mean weight change was -1.0 and -1.2 kg, respectively; 25.4% and 26.9% of patients, respectively, experienced weight loss ≥5% from baseline, and 7.8% and 8.4%, respectively, experienced weight loss ≥10%. CONCLUSIONS: Women treated with flibanserin for HSDD may experience weight loss.

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of extended release lorcaserin for the treatment of obesity.

INTRODUCTION: Lorcaserin is a serotonin 2C receptor antagonist that was FDA approved in 2012. Lorcaserin is recently available as an extended-release (ER) formulation for the treatment of obesity as an adjunct to lifestyle modification. Areas covered: The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of lorcaserin ER will be reviewed. Expert opinion: Lorcaserin ER 20mg daily provides drug exposure bioequivalent to lorcaserin immediate release (IR) 10mg twice daily. Lorcaserin IR is associated with 3.3 and 3.0% placebo-subtracted weight loss in patients without and with diabetes, respectively. A1C was reduced by 0.9% in patients with diabetes. Common side effects include headache, dry mouth, constipation, dizziness, fatigue, and nausea. Lorcaserin provides potential advantages over other antiobesity medications in regards to tolerability and simplicity of medication initiation, but may not be as effective as other options. Lorcaserin ER offers improved ease of administration and anticipated adherence compared to the IR formulation. The place in therapy for lorcaserin ER and other antiobesity medications will be further clarified by results of pending clinical trials addressing cardiovascular outcomes as well as the role pharmacogenomics and comorbid disease states may play in choosing patient-specific therapy.

The pharmacodynamic effects of combined administration of flibanserin and alcohol.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Flibanserin is a serotonin 5-HT1A agonist and 5-HT2A antagonist approved for the treatment of acquired, generalized hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in premenopausal women. Because of the increased risk of hypotension- and syncope-related adverse events (AEs) observed with coadministration of flibanserin and alcohol, alcohol use is contraindicated. To provide a more comprehensive understanding of the interaction between flibanserin and alcohol, the results of a dedicated phase 1 alcohol-interaction study and a pooled analysis of phase 3 studies of premenopausal women with HSDD are presented. METHODS: In the phase 1 study, healthy participants (males [n=23] and females [n=2]) were randomly assigned to one of five sequence groups, which determined the order in which they were to receive flibanserin 100 mg or placebo, with or without ethanol 0.4 g/kg or 0.8 g/kg. Change from baseline in seated blood pressure, orthostatic vital signs, AEs and visual analogue scale sedation outcomes were examined. Blood samples were collected at baseline and for up to 4 hours after dosing to determine flibanserin area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 hours (AUC0-4 ). Pooled data from five phase 3 studies of patients receiving flibanserin 100 mg once daily (n=1543), or placebo (n=1905), were analysed. RESULTS: In the phase 1 study, the incidence of hypotension and syncope increased when flibanserin was coadministered with ethanol. Sedation increased 20% and 27% from baseline with flibanserin plus ethanol 0.4 g/kg and 0.8 g/kg, respectively, at 4 hours post-dose. In the pooled analysis of phase 3 studies, 58.2% and 63.6% of participants receiving flibanserin or placebo, respectively, reported baseline alcohol use. In patients receiving flibanserin, fatigue and dizziness occurred more frequently in patients with vs. without alcohol use. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Results from this study suggest that increased incidence of hypotension- and syncope-related events may result from a pharmacodynamic interaction between flibanserin and alcohol, although the clinical significance of these interactions in real-world populations remains unclear.

Effect of sarpogrelate, a selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, on characteristics of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sarpogrelate, a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 2A antagonist, is a potential antiplatelet agent. We performed a randomized study to evaluate the effect of sarpogrelate on vascular health in Korean patients with diabetes. METHODS: Forty diabetic patients aged 58.6 ± 6.8 years with 10-75% coronary artery stenosis, as assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography, were randomly assigned to sarpogrelate 300 mg/day plus aspirin 100 mg/day (SPG + ASA group) or aspirin 100 mg/day alone (ASA group) for 6 months. The primary endpoint of this study was the change in coronary artery disease including the calcium score (CACS), maximal stenosis, and plaque volume (calcified vs. noncalcified). The secondary endpoints were changes in biochemical parameters related to glucose and lipid metabolism, and in subclinical atherosclerosis assessed by ankle-brachial index and pulse wave velocity. RESULTS: After 6-month treatment, there was no significant difference in the changes in CACS, coronary stenosis, ankle-brachial index, and pulse wave velocity, between groups. The total plaque volume decreased from 82.4 ± 14.5 mm3 to 74.6 ± 14.4 mm3 in the SPG + ASA group, but increased from 64.9 ± 16.0 mm3 to 68.6 ± 16.3 mm3 in the ASA group (p < 0.05), mainly driven by changes in the noncalcified component (SPG + ASA group 15.6 ± 4.6 mm3 to 11.2 ± 3.7 mm3vs. ASA group 21.2 ± 6.2 mm3 to 22.8 ± 6.6 mm3, p < 0.01). Serum C-reactive protein levels and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance tended to decrease in the SPG + ASA group, but they were not altered in the ASA group. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that sarpogrelate treatment may decrease coronary artery plaque volume, particularly the noncalcified portion, in patients with diabetes.

An original pharmacoepidemiological-pharmacodynamic method: application to antipsychotic-induced movement disorders.

AIMS: Pharmacovigilance databases are usually used to detect new potential signals that are relevant for drug safety. They are seldom used for explanatory purposes, e.g. to understand the mechanisms of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The aim of the present study was to combine pharmacovigilance and pharmacodynamic data to investigate the association between dopamine D2, serotonin 5HT2A, and muscarinic M1 receptor occupancy and the risks of antipsychotic drug (AP)-induced movement disorders. METHODS: First, we performed a case-noncase analysis using spontaneous reports from the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) database, VigiBase®. We thus measured the risk of reporting movement disorders compared with all other ADRs [expressed as a reporting odds ratio (ROR)] for APs. Second, we performed a linear regression analysis to explore the association between the estimated risk of reporting for individual drugs and their receptor occupancy properties, for D2, 5HT2A and M1 receptors. RESULTS: Compared with second-generation APs, first-generation APs were found to be significantly more associated with the reporting of movement disorders in general but also with dystonia, Parkinsonism, akathisia and tardive dyskinesia, irrespective of gender. A significant inverse correlation was found between the ROR for movement disorders and the receptor occupancy of 5HT2A [P < 0.001; R2  = 0.51; slope = -0.014; 95% confidence interval (CI) (-0.029, 0.001)], M1 (P < 0.001; R2  = 0.56; slope = -0.014; 95% CI (-0.028, 0.001) but not D2 dopamine (P = 0.54; R2  = 0.02; slope = -0.003; 95% CI (-0.007, 0.001) receptors. CONCLUSIONS: Using the example of AP-induced movement disorders, the present study underlines the value of the pharmacoepidemiological-pharmacodynamic method to explore ADR mechanisms in humans and real-life settings.

Preparation and in vivo evaluation of a gel-based nasal delivery system for risperidone.

The aim of this study was to prepare a nasal gel of risperidone and to investigate the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of the drug in rats. Compared with oral dosing, the risperidone nasal gel exhibited very fast absorption and high bioavailability. Maximal plasma concentration (cmax) and the time to reach cmax (tmax) were 15.2 µg mL-1 and 5 min for the nasal gel, 3.6 µg mL-1 and 30 min for the oral drug suspension, respectively. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as tmax', cmax and AUC of oral and nasal routes were significantly different (p < 0.01). Relative bioavailability of the drug nasal preparation to the oral suspension was up to 1600.0 %. Further, the in vitro effect of the risperidone nasal gel on nasal mucociliary movement was also investigated using a toad palate model. The risperidone nasal formulation showed mild ciliotoxicity, but the adverse effect was temporary and reversible.

A Case Report of Probable Paliperidone ER-Induced Serotonin Syndrome in a 17-Year-Old Taiwanese Female With New Onset Psychosis.

A 17-year-old female with new-onset psychosis was treated with paliperidone. After increasing the paliperidone dose to 12 mg per day the patient developed a series of side effects; Tachycardia (140 bpm), severe drooling, restlessness, diaphoresis, whole-body tremor, inducible foot clonus, predominant lower limbs rigidity, bilateral pupil dilation, increased bowel sounds with watery diarrhea, and muscle hypertonicity. The symptoms subsided after stopping the paliperidone, and recurred after resuming paliperidone 9 mg per day. To our knowledge, this is the first case of a very clear and close relationship between the symptoms of serotonin syndrome and the use of paliperidone. We have to cautiously consider the diagnosis of serotonin syndrome in potential cases.

Safety of antipsychotic drugs: focus on therapeutic and adverse effects.

INTRODUCTION: Schizophrenia is a chronic psychiatric disease, which is treated by antipsychotic drugs. These drugs are mostly D2 and 5-HT2A antagonists and have extrapyramidal side effects depending on the D2 antagonistic effect. Recently admitted antipsychotic drugs also have systemic side effects. Clozapine, which has the strongest antipsychotic effect, can cause neutropenia. A problem in the treatment of schizophrenia is poor patient compliance leading to the recurrence of psychotic symptoms. AREAS COVERED: A search was carried out in Medline using the following terms: antipsychotic drugs, antipsychotic effect, risperidone, olanzapine, clozapine, ziprasidone, aripiprazol, asenapine, questiapine, cariprazine, lurasidone, arrythmia, diabetes mellitus, weight gain, epileptic activity, extrapyramidal symptoms, sexual activity, clinical trials and tolerability. EXPERT OPINION: Most clinical trials describe a good antipsychotic effect of the currently used antipsychotic drugs. The efficacy and safety of the antipsychotic drugs also depend on the form of schizophrenia, for example, the chronic recurrent form of schizophrenia. Clozapine and olanzapine have the safest therapeutic effect, while the side effect of neutropenia must be controlled by 3 weekly blood controls. If schizophrenia has remitted and if patients show a good compliance, the adverse effects can be controlled. The pharmacological treatment should be combined with social therapies and psychoeducation in order to reach a good therapeutic outcome.