Estrogen-free oral hormonal contraception: benefits of the progestin-only pill.

Although combined oral contraceptives (COCs) are commonly used and highly effective in preventing pregnancy, they may not be suitable for some women. COC use is associated with increased rates of cardiovascular events and is not recommended in nonbreastfeeding women in the immediate postpartum period or in breastfeeding women during the initial 6 months of breastfeeding. Moreover, estrogen-related adverse effects, such as headache, are common. Estrogen-free progestin-only pills (POPs) are a valuable option in women who prefer to take an oral hormonal contraceptive, but are ineligible for, or choose not to use, COCs. Although some POPs have been associated with lower contraceptive effectiveness than COCs, the POP containing desogestrel has shown similar contraceptive effectiveness to COCs. The most commonly reported complaints in women using all POPs are bleeding problems. Counseling women interested in using POPs about the variable bleeding patterns associated with this method may improve compliance and acceptance.

Post abortion contraception and its effect on repeat abortions in Auckland, New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Many misconceptions still prevail about the appropriateness of use of the intrauterine device (IUD), particularly for younger women. This study examines the factors associated with post abortion IUD use as compared to the combined oral contraceptive pill (COC). It then examines the effect of type of post abortion contraception with the likelihood of seeking subsequent abortions. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective cohort study followed, for a period of 3 years, 1422 women who had a first trimester surgical abortion between November 2004 and January 2005 in Auckland's public abortion clinic. RESULTS: Compared to women who left the clinic with COC, those leaving with an IUD (OR 0.3) at baseline were less likely to return for a subsequent abortion. Among women who had not had a previous termination, younger women were less likely than older women to have had an IUD inserted post abortion. With every additional live birth, women were three times as likely to have left the abortion clinic with an IUD. Among women who had had a previous termination, age was no longer significantly associated with post abortion IUD insertion. However, parity was still significantly associated, as was having a negative sexually transmitted infection test. CONCLUSIONS: Young and nulliparous women are less likely to use an IUD as a method of contraception following an abortion. However, those women who have an IUD inserted following an abortion are much less likely to return for a subsequent abortion. IUDs are a safe and effective method of contraception that are currently still underused among the younger population.

Efectos beneficiosos no anticonceptivos de la píldora anticonceptiva / No disponible

El primer objetivo del uso de un anticonceptivo oral combinado (AOC) es el de evitar un embarazo. En ocasiones el AOC se asocia a efectos secundarios, pero cada día se conocen mejor los efectos beneficiosos no anticonceptivos del mismo. Existe evidencia de una buena calidad que asocia el uso de AOC con la mejoría de la dismenorrea, la disminución del sangrado menstrual y la mejoría del síndrome premenstrual. También se sabe que el uso de AOC protege frente a la enfermedad inflamatoria pélvica (EIP) y el embarazo ectópico, reduce la pérdida mineral ósea y es eficaz en el tratamiento del acné leve y moderado. Además, la AOC disminuye la incidencia de cáncer de ovario y cáncer de endometrio. Conocer estos efectos beneficiosos resulta de interés tanto para los profesionales sanitarios como para las mujeres (AU)

The first objective of using a combined oral contraceptive(COC) is that of avoiding pregnancy. COC is sometimes associated to side effects, but its non-contraceptive beneficial effects are becoming known day by day. There is evidence of the good quality associated to the use of COC with the improvement of dysmenorrhea, decrease of menstrual bleeding and improvement of premenstrual syndrome. It is also known that the use of COC protects against pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and ectopic pregnancy, reduces bone mineral loss and is effective in the treatment of mild and moderate acne. Furthermore, COC decreases the incidence of ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer. Knowing these beneficial effects is of interest, both for the health care professionals and for women (AU)

Bleeding pattern, tolerance and patient satisfaction with a drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive evaluated in 3488 women in Europe, the Middle East and Canada.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess the bleeding pattern, tolerance and patient satisfaction associated with an oral contraceptive (OC) containing 3 mg of drospirenone and 30 mcg of ethinyl estradiol under real-life conditions. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, prospective and observational six-cycle study was conducted in 12 countries in Europe, the Middle East and Canada. The efficacy variables included an assessment of bleeding patterns, premenstrual symptoms of water retention and patient satisfaction as determined by a visual analog scale. RESULTS: A total of 3488 women was enrolled in the study. The percentage of women with intermenstrual bleeding decreased from 27.9% at baseline to 5.4% at the end of Cycle 6, while dysmenorrhea decreased from 67% to 17.7%. Also, amenorrhea decreased from 21.3% to 7.5%. The decreases in all three parameters were statistically significant (p<.0001). Approximately 70% of the women reported abdominal bloating and/or breast tenderness at baseline and less than 38% did so at the end of Cycle 6 (p<.0001). Patient satisfaction increased for all investigated items. Upon completion of the study, 86.2% of the women answered "yes" to continuing treatment with this OC. CONCLUSION: The OC containing 3 mg of drospirenone and 30 mcg of ethinyl estradiol has beneficial effects on bleeding pattern, symptoms of water retention and patient satisfaction.

Combined oral contraceptives: a comprehensive review.

Millions of women use birth control pills for contraceptive and noncontraceptive reasons. Although there have been reports of rare adverse events, birth control pills do offer well-documented health benefits, including a decrease in the risk of ovarian and endometrial carcinoma. In addition, manufacturers continue to modify birth control pills to reduce side effects and medical risks.

Efficacy and safety of a low-dose 24-day combined oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone.

The aim of this open-label, multicenter, noncomparative study was to determine the efficacy, safety and bleeding profile of a new low-dose, monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone administered daily for 24 days followed by a 4-day hormone-free interval. Contraceptive efficacy was analyzed for 1018 women completing 11,140 treatment cycles. Eleven pregnancies occurred, giving a Pearl Index (PI) of 1.29 (upper limit of the 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.30); of these pregnancies, five were considered due to method failure, giving an adjusted PI of 0.72 (upper limit of the 95% CI, 1.69). A total of 7 (0.7%) women discontinued study medication because of irregular bleeding, suggesting a favorable bleeding profile. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated with an excellent safety profile. The majority of women (86%) stated that they were satisfied or very satisfied with the treatment and over 70% of women would have continued with the study medication.

FFPRHC Guidance (October 2003): First prescription of combined oral contraception.

The Guidance provides information for clinicians on the steps to be taken before providing a woman with her first prescription for combined oral contraception. It updates and replaces previous Faculty Guidance. A key to the grades of recommendations, based on levels of evidence, is given at the end of this document. Details of the methods used by the Clinical Effectiveness Unit (CEU) in developing this Guidance, and evidence tables summarising the research basis of the recommendations, are available on the Faculty website (www.ffprhc.org.uk). Abbreviations used include: blood pressure (BP), body mass (BMI), bone mineral density (BMD), breakthrough bleeding (BTB), British National Formulary (BNF), combined oral contraception (COC), Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM), confidence interval (CI), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), emergency contraception (EC), ethinyl oestradiol (EE), Faculty Aid to Continuing Professional Development Topics (FACT), Family Planning Association (fpa), follicule-stimulating homone (FSH), general practitioner (GP), intermenstrual bleeding (IMB), luteinising hormone (LT), microgram, myocardial infarction (MI), odds ratio (OR), oral contraception (OC), pulmonary embolism (PE), relative risk (RR), Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN), sexually transmitted infection (STI), Summary of Product Characteristics (SPCs), venous thomboembolism (VTE), World Health Organization (WHO), WHO Medical Eligibility Criteria (WHOMEC), WHO Selected Practice Recommendations (WHOSPR).

Contraceptive efficacy and cycle control with the Ortho Evra/Evra transdermal system: the analysis of pooled data.

OBJECTIVE: To present efficacy and cycle control data pooled from three pivotal studies of the contraceptive patch (Ortho Evra/Evra). DESIGN: Three multicenter, open-label, contraceptive studies that included up to 13 treatment cycles. SETTING: 183 centers. PATIENT(S): 3,319 women. INTERVENTION(S): Three consecutive 7-day patches (21 days) with 1 patch-free week per cycle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Contraceptive efficacy and cycle control. RESULT(S): Overall and method failure life-table estimates of contraceptive failure through 13 cycles were 0.8% (95% CI, 0.3%-1.3%) and 0.6% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.9%), respectively. Corresponding Pearl indices were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.44-1.33) and 0.7 (95% CI, 0.31-1.10). Contraceptive failure among women with a body weight < 90 kg (<198 lb) was low and uniformly distributed across the weight range. A subgroup of women with body weight > or = 90 kg (> or = 198 lb) may have increased risk of pregnancy. The incidence of breakthrough bleeding was low and decreased over time. CONCLUSION(S): In contraceptive patch users, the overall annual probability of pregnancy was 0.8% and the method failure probability was 0.6%. The efficacy of the patch was high and similar across age and racial groups. Among women < 90 kg (<198 lb), contraceptive failure was low and uniformly distributed across the range of body weights. In women > or = 90 kg (> or = 198 lb), contraceptive failures may be increased. Efficacy and cycle control have been shown to be comparable to an established oral contraceptive.

A comparative and pooled analysis of the safety and tolerability of the contraceptive patch (Ortho Evra/Evra).

OBJECTIVE: To review the safety and tolerability of the contraceptive patch (Ortho Evra/Evra) versus a standard oral contraceptive (Triphasil) and to present the pooled safety and tolerability of the patch across three pivotal studies. DESIGN: Three open-label, contraceptive studies of up to 13 treatment cycles. SETTING: 183 centers. PATIENT(S): Comparative study (812 patch, 605 oral contraceptive); pooled analysis (3,330 patch). INTERVENTION(S): The patch regimen was three consecutive 7-day patches (21 days) followed by 1 patch-free week per cycle; the oral contraceptive was dosed according to the U.S. physician package insert. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, and body weight. RESULT(S): The incidence of most events was similar between the patch and oral contraceptive groups, with the exception of a higher incidence of application site reactions, breast discomfort (cycles 1 and 2 only), and dysmenorrhea in the patch group. Pooled analysis demonstrated that most application site reactions (92%) and breast symptoms (86%) were mild or moderate in severity, and <2% of participants discontinued the patch because of either event. Only 7 (0.2%) participants experienced a serious adverse event classified as possibly, probably, or likely related to the patch. The mean change in body weight from baseline to the end of treatment was an increase of 0.3 kg. CONCLUSION(S): Overall, the contraceptive patch is well tolerated and has a side effect profile similar to an established oral contraceptive.

An open-label, multicenter study to evaluate Yasmin, a low-dose combination oral contraceptive containing drospirenone, a new progestogen.

This open-label, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and cycle control of Yasmin, a new low-dose, monophasic oral contraceptive containing the unique progestogen drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg and ethinyl estradiol (EE) 30 microg. DRSP is a synthetic progestogen that has antiandrogenic and antimineralocorticoid effects. In this study, 326 women were evaluated and 220 (67%) completed all 13 treatment cycles. The corrected Pearl Index was 0. 407. Of the 151 subjects who experienced intermenstrual bleeding at any time during the study, the majority (64%) had bleeding during only one or two pill cycles. Breakthrough bleeding without spotting occurred in 1% of all cycles, spotting without breakthrough bleeding in 9.3% of all cycles, and breakthrough bleeding with spotting in 3% of all cycles. Amenorrhea was observed in 3% of all cycles. In all, 20 subjects (6%) discontinued participation in the study because of adverse events. No serious adverse events related to the study drug were reported. No clinically significant changes in weight, blood pressure, or lipids were reported. The impact of the new progestogen DRSP on the women's self-perception of menstrual health was also evaluated. Subjects reported that symptoms of water retention, negative affect, and increased appetite significantly improved at cycle 6 from baseline. This study demonstrates that Yasmin is an effective oral contraceptive that is safe and well tolerated.

Efficacy, cycle control, and side effects of low- and lower-dose oral contraceptives: a randomized trial of 20 micrograms and 35 micrograms estrogen preparations.

Estrogen content represents a tradeoff between cycle control and side effects, but few direct comparisons of 20 and 30/35 micrograms preparations are available. To address this issue, we conducted a randomized, open-label multicenter clinical trial comparing Alesse (20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol [EE]), Mircette (20 micrograms EE), and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (35 micrograms EE) among 463 OC starters or switchers. Bloating, breast tenderness, and nausea were approximately 50% more common in women using 35 micrograms EE as compared to 20 micrograms EE preparations. Cycle control was similar in all products, although during the first two cycles among starters; users of Mircette and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (Tri-Cyclen) exhibited better cycle control than Alesse users. Discontinuation and pregnancy rates were not significantly higher in 35 micrograms EE users.

PIP: Estrogen content represents a tradeoff between cycle control and side effects, but few direct comparisons of 20 and 30/35 mcg preparations are available. To address this issue, researchers conducted a randomized, open-label multicenter clinical trial comparing Alesse (20 mcg ethinyl estradiol [EE]), Mircette (20 mcg EE), and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (35 mcg EE) among 463 oral contraceptive starters or switchers. Bloating, breast tenderness, and nausea were approximately 50% more common in women using 35 mcg EE as in those using 20 mcg EE preparations. Cycle control was similar in all products, although during the first two cycles among starters, users of Mircette and Ortho Tri-Cyclen (Tri-Cyclen) exhibited better cycle control than Alesse users. Discontinuation and pregnancy rates were not significantly higher in 35 mcg EE users.

Combined oral contraceptives: do we know all of their effects?

Combined oral contraceptives are undoubtedly popular. By the end of the 1980's, an estimated 63 million married women around the world were using this method of contraception. In Britain, perhaps 95% of all sexually active women have used the pill at some time before their 30th birthday. Commensurate with such widespread usage, huge amounts of money have been spent during the past 35 years investigating the health effects of this method of contraception. Since it appears that all of the potential risks and benefits have now been identified, can we divert resources from pill-related research into new areas of activity. While this proposition may be attractive to funding bodies, and other researchers competing for increasingly scarce resources, it ignores the fact that several major uncertainties remain concerning the safety of combined oral contraceptives.

PIP: Despite hundreds of research studies, definitive answers on the long-term health risks associated with combined oral contraceptives (OCs) remain elusive. There is general agreement that the adverse vascular effects of first-generation OCs containing 50 mcg or more of estrogen are not influenced by duration of use and do not persist once OC use is stopped. On the other hand, the pill's protective effect against endometrial and epithelial ovarian cancer is strengthened with prolonged use and persists after discontinuation. Less certain is the impact of long-term OC use by young, nulliparous women on breast cancer risk. Also in need of investigation is the association between pill use and cervical cancer--the most common malignancy among women in developing countries. As the first generation of OC users reaches the age where long-term effects become evident, these risks can be more definitively assessed. However, the risks associated with the new, low-dose OCs will remain uncertain for several decades. Of concern is the finding that users of low-dose OCs have a greater risk of breast cancer than users of the earlier, high-dose formulations. In addition, the new pills are less suppressive of plasma gonadotropin levels and ovarian activity, raising concerns about ovarian cancer risk. Given these uncertainties, continued funding for OC research is urged.

The effect on blood pressure of a monophasic oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and gestodene.

To obtain an overview of the effect of monophasic gestodene on blood pressure and to determine the frequency of "OC elevated BP/hypertension," the results of blood pressure monitoring from four clinical studies of contraceptive efficacy and safety have been retrospectively analyzed. A total of 1930 women took part in the studies, which recorded BP for up to 24 cycles. Analysis of results revealed that 97 women (5.0%) showed an increase in blood pressure from previously normal to elevated values while taking monophasic gestodene, with only 26 (1.35%) fulfilling the criteria of "OC elevated BP/hypertension." Only four women dropped out of the trials due to hypertensive blood pressure values, while 67 women (3.5%) experienced a normalization of previously elevated blood pressure measurements. In conclusion, this analysis has confirmed that gestodene has a negligible effect on blood pressure, with increased BP a relatively rare event.

PIP: Schering AG (manufacturer of a monophasic oral contraceptive [OC] containing 75 mcg gestodene plus 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol) in Berlin, Germany, conducted a retrospective analysis of blood pressure measurements from 4 clinical trials of the contraceptive efficacy and safety of monophasic gestodene to examine gestodene's effect on blood pressure and the incidence of OC-related blood pressure/ hypertension. (OC-related blood pressure/hypertension is defined as: women with neither history of hypertension nor elevated blood pressure before OC use develop increased blood pressure or hypertension that is reversible once OC use ceases.) The clinical trials recorded the blood pressure of 1930 women for up to 24 cycles. Most women (89.9%) experienced no change in their blood pressure during OC use. 97 women (5%) experienced an increase in blood pressure. 26 women (1.35%) had OC-elevated blood pressure/hypertension. Four women left the trials due to hypertension. 67 women (3.5%) who had elevated blood pressure before OC use attained normalization of blood pressure during OC use. These results show that the gestodene-containing OC had an insignificant effect on blood pressure and that elevated blood pressure rarely occurred.

A multicentred phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1 given monthly by intramuscular injection to Chinese women. I. Contraceptive efficacy and sid effects.

A phase III clinical study was carried out among 5680 fertile Chinese women to evaluate efficacy and side effects of three monthly injectable contraceptives: Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Chinese Injectable No. 1. When used in a once-a-month treatment schedule (part 1 of study), the effectiveness of Chinese Injectable No. 1 was unacceptably low; 36 pregnancies occurred during the first 1743 women-months of use, 16 before the second injection. The study was restarted with a revised injection schedule for Injectable No. 1: two injections separated by 9 +/- 1 days during the first month and subsequent injections given 10-12 days after the onset of bleeding, or if no bleeding occurred, 28 days after previous injection. In part 2 of the study, 988, 990 and 992 subjects were provided Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1, respectively. Life-table pregnancy rates at one year were 0.41%, 0% and 0.77% (p < 0.05), respectively; the overall discontinuation rates at one year were 13.9%, 19.1% and 20.4% (p < 0.001). Discontinuation rates for bleeding problems were significantly different between the groups: discontinuation rates for amenorrhea were 0.58%, 3.71% and 0.68% (p < 0.001) for Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1; for other bleeding problems, the rates were 4.88%, 8.38% and 12.64% (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding discontinuation for other medical or non-medical reasons. Mean weight changes after one year of use were small: 0.73, 0.86 and 0.17 kg for the three groups, respectively. Both Mesigyna and Cyclofem were very effective for contraception, but Mesigyna appeared to be tolerated slightly better with regard to cycle control; the modified dose regimen for Injectable No. 1 also gave a low pregnancy rate but was associated with higher rates of discontinuation.

A multicentred phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1 given by intramuscular injection to Chinese women. II. The comparison of bleeding patterns.

Between 1988 and 1992, a randomized phase III clinical trial was conducted in China to compare three monthly injectable contraceptives: Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1. This paper presents a detailed analysis of the menstrual diaries provided by 5098 (89%) of the subjects. In total, 902, 903 and 913 diaries were analyzed to compare bleeding patterns induced by Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1. The first withdrawal bleeding usually occurs 14-20 days after the first injection for all three of these preparations. Thereafter, 50% of Mesigyna users had precisely 3 bleeding/spotting episodes every 90 days, 50% of Cyclofem users had 2-3 and 50% of Injectable No. 1 users had 3-4 episodes every 90 days. Relative to users of Mesigyna or Cyclofem, Injectable No. 1 users had 2-3 more bleeding/spotting days, and a shorter length of bleeding/spotting-free intervals in each period. 63.7%, 41.4% and 60.6% of subjects using Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1, respectively, had bleeding patterns similar to their untreated patterns in the first 90-day period. The percentages increased to 82.2% 67.8% and 75.0% in the fourth 90-day period. A total of 1815 diaries for Mesigyna and 1802 for Cyclofem were analyzed for more in depth comparison of these two methods. The number of bleeding/spotting days over four periods showed little difference between the two group, but there were more spotting days and there was greater individual variability among Cyclofem users.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PIP: Between October 1988 and July 1990, a randomized multicentered phase III clinical trial was conducted in three provinces of China to compare three monthly injectable contraceptives (Mesigyna [50 mg norethisterone enanthate + 5 mg estradiol valerate], Cyclofem [25 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate + 5 mg estradiol cypionate], and Injectable No.1 [250 mg 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate + 5 mg estradiol valerate]). A detailed analysis of the menstrual diaries of 5098 women aged 18-35 years compared the vaginal bleeding patterns associated with the injectables. Women in all three groups experienced more bleeding/spotting (B/S) days, more bleeding episodes, shorter bleeding-free intervals, and larger variability during the first 90 days than during the following three 90-day periods (p 0.001). 90% of Cyclofem users had 1-4 B/S episodes. 90% of Mesigyna users had 2-4.2 B/S episodes. Cyclofem users had more spotting days than did Mesigyna users in each 90-day period (5-8 vs. 5-6). Acceptable bleeding patterns (i.e., bleeding patterns similar to untreated patterns) predominated, on the most part, in all four periods (63.7-82.2% for Mesigyna users, 41.4-67.8% for Cyclofem users, and 60.6-75% for Injectable No.1 users). Acceptability increased with each 90-day period for all three injectables. Acceptability of bleeding patterns was much higher among Mesigyna users than Cyclofem users (p 0.001). Prolonged bleeding, followed by irregular bleeding and frequent bleeding, were the most common bleeding disturbances. Irregular bleeding decreased with time. 79.1% of Mesigyna and Cyclofem users who finished the study had an acceptable pattern. 70.7% of women who stopped for non-bleeding reasons had an acceptable pattern compared to 31.3% of those who stopped for bleeding reasons. These findings show that Mesigyna users experienced better cycle control and more acceptable bleeding patterns than did the users of the other two injectables.

Prescribing oral contraceptives.

The combined oral contraceptive pill is the most popular method of contraception worldwide, with modern low-dose formulations significantly improving tolerability. Breakthrough bleeding is the most significant adverse event associated with the low-dose combined oral contraceptives. Monophasic, biphasic, triphasic and progestogen-only preparations are available, and the choice of formulation should be tailored to best suit the patient. Any areas of uncertainty or concern that the patient has should be addressed, and the patient should be clearly informed of how to use the oral contraceptive effectively, the likely initial adverse effects and what to do if a pill is missed.

Climacteric symptoms and control of the cycle in women aged 35 years or older taking an oral contraceptive with 0.150 mg desogestrel and 0.020 mg ethinylestradiol.

In a multicenter prospective trial, 58 healthy women aged between 35 and 49 years were studied for one year (639 cycles) while taking an oral contraceptive (OC) containing desogestrel 0.150 mg and ethinylestradiol (EE) 0.020 mg. Efficacy, control of the cycle, side effects, complaints, and climacteric symptoms were monitored after 3, 6, 9 and 12 cycles. No pregnancies occurred during the study period. Spotting gradually decreased from 29.3% in cycle 1 to 4.2% in cycle 12, while breakthrough bleeding (BTB) disappeared after cycle 7. One case of superficial thrombophlebitis and 3 cases of minor side effects were registered. With regard to the complaints, breast tenderness, headache, and depression gradually decreased during the study (basal vs. 12-month data: 50.9% vs. 31.2%, 48.3% vs. 18.7%, 39.6% vs. 20.8%, respectively), while nausea disappeared after three months. A significant treatment-dependent reduction of climacteric symptoms was obtained after cycle 3 and this tendency was maintained up to cycle 12. No changes were registered in body mass index (BMI) or blood pressure.

Twelve years of clinical experience with an oral contraceptive containing 30 micrograms ethinyloestradiol and 150 micrograms desogestrel.

The clinical experience with a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 150 micrograms desogestrel and 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol is reviewed. Fourteen clinical trials have been reported involving over 44,000 women for more than 190,000 cycles. None of the 17 pregnancies which occurred (overall Pearl Index 0.12) were due to method failure. The incidences of breakthrough bleeding and spotting after 6 treatment cycles varied from 0.1-6.0% and 2.8-11% of subjects, respectively, and at this time they were not significantly different from pretreatment in most trials. About 90% of subjects maintained regular cycles. The incidence of subjective side effects (approximately 5% for headache, 4% for breast tenderness, 2% for nausea) was low. No significant changes occurred in body weight or blood pressure. In all trials, the COC was well accepted and the rates of discontinuation were similar to those in other COC trials. Pharmacodynamic effects have been widely investigated. There were no significant changes in glucose metabolism or in haematological factors except for possibly minor increases in factors VII and X, fibrinogen and plasminogen. Over thirty studies of the effect of the COC on lipid metabolism have been published; significant increases occur in serum triglycerides, HDL-C and apoprotein A1. SHBG concentrations increase 2-3 fold with a consequent decrease in the levels of free testosterone. This effect can be particularly important therapeutically in women with hyperandrogenic skin disorders and 14 trials in women with these disorders have demonstrated significant clinical improvement with the COC. The findings from the various trials show the COC to be effective and acceptable with no adverse metabolic effects.

Comparative evaluation of the androgenicity of four low-dose, fixed-combination oral contraceptives.

Changes in endogenous androgen metabolism were compared in healthy women taking one of four low-dose modern oral contraceptives (OCs). One hundred women were randomized to (1) 35 micrograms ethinyl estradiol (EE) + 250 micrograms norgestimate (Cilest); (2) 20 micrograms EE + 150 micrograms desogestrel (Mercilon); (3) 30 micrograms EE + 150 micrograms desogestrel (Marvelon); or (4) 30 micrograms EE + 75 micrograms gestodene (Femodene). During the luteal phase of the pretreatment cycle, body weight and blood pressure were recorded, and plasma levels of the following variables were recorded: sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), cortisol-binding globulin (CBG), testosterone, free testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, androstenedione, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), and hydroxyprogesterone. The free androgen index was also calculated. These variables were remeasured during the third week of OC intake and during the fourth and sixth cycles. There were no statistically significant differences in androgenic variables among the four OCs. The DHEAS concentration decreased less with the 20 micrograms EE + desogestrel formulation compared with either 30 micrograms EE + desogesterel or norgestimate-containing formulations (20% vs. 45%). Concentrations of SHBG and CBG increased significantly in all four groups (average 263 +/- 119% and 94 +/- 26%, respectively); CBG increased less in women taking 20 micrograms EE + desogestrel (about 75%) than in the other formulations (about 100%). The four modern, low-dose OCs tested had similar impacts on endogenous androgen metabolism, yielding significant decreases in testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, androstenedione, and DHEAS. All of these formulations may be beneficial in women with androgen-related syndromes such as acne and hirsutism. Large studies are under way to establish which of the third-generation OCs is the least androgenic. In vitro studies suggest that norgestimate has the least androgenic profile.

Multicenter study in Hungary with a 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol- and 150 micrograms desogestrel-containing monophasic oral contraceptive.

Among the countries in Central and Eastern Europe, Hungary has a high oral contraceptive prevalence rate. Until recently, however, Hungarian women have not had access to combined oral contraceptives with new, third-generation progestogens. Marvelon (30 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 150 micrograms desogestrel) was first introduced in 1981 in Western Europe and has, in a number of different studies, proven an effective and well-tolerated oral contraceptive with no effect on blood pressure and a favorable lipid profile. Marvelon was introduced in Hungary in October 1991. Prior to its introduction, a multicenter study was undertaken in Hungary with Marvelon to confirm the clinical results of studies from other countries. The present study confirmed Marvelon to be an effective, well-tolerated combined oral contraceptive with no relevant effect on blood pressure. Remarkable improvements were noted, especially with regard to side-effects, in switchers from other oral contraceptives. It is concluded that Marvelon is a valuable extension of the range of contraceptive methods available in Hungary.