Standardizing Methods of Reading CT Maximum Aortic Diameters Amongst Experts Reduces Variations and Discordance, Improving Accuracy.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the method of obtaining abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) maximum diameters based on computed tomographic angiography, and the reproducibility and accuracy of different methods have recently been debated due to advancements in imaging. This study compared the two most common methods based on orthogonal planes and centerline of flow to determine the discordances and accuracy amongst experiences readers. METHODS: The computed tomographic angiography max diameters of 148 AAAs were measured by three experienced observers, including a vascular surgeon, a radiologist and an imaging cardiologist. Observers used two different methods with standardized protocols: multiplanar reformations based on orthogonal planes, and a software using 3D aortic reconstructions to create centerline flow lumen providing diameters based on cross sections perpendicular to this lumen. Agreements and reliability of measurement methods were assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient and Bland - Altman analysis. Discordances between measurements of the methods and the original reported measurement, as well as outside hospitals were compared. RESULTS: The average age of the cohort was 75 years and aortic diameters ranged from 3.8 to 9.6 cm. For orthogonal readings, there were agreements within 3 mm between 86% and 92% of the time, while centerline - reading agreement was between 88% and 94%, which was not statistically significant. The intra-class correlation coefficient was high between method type and between readers. Within methods, agreement was between 0.96 and 0.97, while within - reader agreement measures was between 0.96 and 0.98. In comparison to the original and the outside hospital reports, 10% ≥ of the original and 20% ≥ of the outside hospital reported measurements were discordant between the readers. CONCLUSION: Maximal AAA measurements can have substantial variability leading to clinical significance and change in patient management and outcomes. Based on the results, orthogonal and centerline measurement methods have equally high agreements and concordance within 3 mm and low variations at a high volume center. However, when compared to the official read reports, there is high discordance rates that can significantly alter patient outcomes. A standardized method of measurement maximum diameter can reduce variations and discordances among different methods.

Radiation dose during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR): upgrade of an angiographic system from standard to Eco mode.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiation dose reduction during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) after the reconfiguration of a Philips AlluraXper FD20 X-ray system. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2015, we implemented a low-dose protocol (Eco dose) increasing the filtration with 1 mm of Al and 0.1 of Cu on both fluoroscopy and fluorography and halving the frames per second in fluoroscopy. The switch was complemented by hybrid operating room staff education and training in radiation protection. We compared two samples of 50 patients treated before the switch (normal dose) with 50 patients treated after the switch (Eco dose). Procedures were categorized into two different grades of complexity, standard and complex, intended as fenestrated/chimney/snorkel and EVAR plus additional embolization to prevent endoleak type II. We evaluated patient demographics, Air Kerma (AK), dose area product (DAP), and procedural data (fluoroscopy time, number of fluorographies, and iodinated contrast). Staff radiation dose was measured with film badge dosimeter on C-arm. RESULTS: The Eco-dose protocol witnessed a DAP reduction of 53% in standard EVARs and of 57% in complex EVARs and an AK reduction of 45% in standard and 57% in complex EVAR. The image quality in 2016 was perceived acceptable, as proven by the fact that fluoroscopy time, number of fluorographies, and contrast medium volumes did not have to be increased. We achieved a reduction in staff dose of 25.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Optimized angiographic system setting significantly reduced the radiation dose both to the patients and to the staff assuring safe EVAR procedures.

Standardization of a Carbon Dioxide Automated System for Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is presently the preferred treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm; however, it requires the injection of a contrast medium, which can hamper the renal function. Other nontoxic agents such as carbon dioxide (CO2) have been sporadically tested in this setting with uncertain results. The aim of the study is to investigate the efficacy of a new standardized CO2 injection method in standard EVAR procedures. METHODS: Between August and October 2016, 31 consecutive patients (median age 76.1 [interquartile range {IQR}: 7.4] years) were submitted to standard EVAR. Proximal and distal endograft landing zones were identified by the injection of 100 mL of CO2 at 300 mm Hg, through an 11 cm 10F femoral sheath by a specifically manufactured automated injection device (Angiodroid Srl, San Lazzaro, Bologna, Italy). Before EVAR deployment, a confirmative injection with a conventional contrast medium was accomplished. The possibility of precisely visualizing the proximal and distal landing zones by CO2 digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was evaluated considering the contrast medium injection obtained in the same procedure as a gold standard. Similarly, the possible presence of endoleak was assessed at the end of the procedure by the 2 techniques. RESULTS: CO2 DSA allowed to identify the juxtarenal landing zone of the endograft in 19/31 cases (61%) and the distal one in 31/31 (100%). In 12 (39%) cases, CO2 injection failed to visualize at least the lowest renal artery. This occurred in large aneurysms with scarce thrombotic apposition and a luminal volume greater than 95.9 (IQR: 25.2) mm3. Completion CO2 DSA detected type II endoleaks (ELIIs) in 10 cases compared with 2 of conventional contrast media. CONCLUSIONS: The injection of nontoxic CO2 through an automated device allowed to perform EVAR procedures effectively, in the majority of cases. In some cases, a single injection of a minimum amount of conventional contrast medium can be used to overcome the lack of renal artery visualization by CO2. ELIIs are more frequently visualized with CO2 compared with standard contrast medium. Although the CO2 injection technique needs further amelioration particularly in the renal arteries detection, this technique appears promising and possibly substitutive of the standard contrast medium, with significant benefit for the renal function.

The Impact of Compliance with Imaging Follow-up on Mortality After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Population Based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Compliance with regular imaging follow-up after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is inconsistent, and evidence of benefit from scheduled long-term surveillance is limited. This study sought to characterize the association between post-EVAR imaging frequency and long-term survival. METHODS: Using administrative health databases for the province of Ontario, Canada, a cohort of patients was identified who underwent EVAR between 2004 and 2014. Minimum appropriate imaging follow-up (MAIFU) was defined as a CT scan or ultrasound of the abdomen within 90 days of EVAR as well as every 15 months thereafter. Multivariate time to event analyses characterized the association between compliance with MAIFU over time and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: 4988 patients treated by EVAR were identified. Median follow-up was 3.4 years (IQR 2.0-5.3 years) and 90 day mortality was 1.6%. Among those who survived over 90 days, 87% (N = 4251 of 4902) underwent at least one CT scan or ultrasound of the abdomen within 90 days, but only 58% (N = 2859 of 4902) went on to meet MAIFU criteria. Infrequent imaging correlated with lower follow-up by a vascular surgeon, but not with infrequent primary care or specialist consultations. Consistently meeting MAIFU criteria was associated with a lower risk of death when compared with missing the first imaging follow-up within 90 days (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.96, p = .014), or when compared with having first imaging follow-up within 90 days but subsequently not meeting MAIFU criteria (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.91, p = .001). A larger proportion of the follow-up period meeting MAIFU criteria was associated with a lower risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: These data support efforts to improve compliance with imaging surveillance after EVAR.

Diagnosis of Aortic Graft Infection: A Case Definition by the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC).

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The management of aortic graft infection (AGI) is highly complex and in the absence of a universally accepted case definition and evidence-based guidelines, clinical approaches and outcomes vary widely. The objective was to define precise criteria for diagnosing AGI. METHODS: A process of expert review and consensus, involving formal collaboration between vascular surgeons, infection specialists, and radiologists from several English National Health Service hospital Trusts with large vascular services (Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration [MAGIC]), produced the definition. RESULTS: Diagnostic criteria from three categories were classified as major or minor. It is proposed that AGI should be suspected if a single major criterion or two or more minor criteria from different categories are present. AGI is diagnosed if there is one major plus any criterion (major or minor) from another category. (i) Clinical/surgical major criteria comprise intraoperative identification of pus around a graft and situations where direct communication between the prosthesis and a nonsterile site exists, including fistulae, exposed grafts in open wounds, and deployment of an endovascular stent-graft into an infected field (e.g., mycotic aneurysm); minor criteria are localized AGI features or fever ≥38°C, where AGI is the most likely cause. (ii) Radiological major criteria comprise increasing perigraft gas volume on serial computed tomography (CT) imaging or perigraft gas or fluid (≥7 weeks and ≥3 months, respectively) postimplantation; minor criteria include other CT features or evidence from alternative imaging techniques. (iii) Laboratory major criteria comprise isolation of microorganisms from percutaneous aspirates of perigraft fluid, explanted grafts, and other intraoperative specimens; minor criteria are positive blood cultures or elevated inflammatory indices with no alternative source. CONCLUSION: This AGI definition potentially offers a practical and consistent diagnostic standard, essential for comparing clinical management strategies, trial design, and developing evidence-based guidelines. It requires validation that is planned in a multicenter, clinical service database supported by the Vascular Society of Great Britain & Ireland.

Effect of automated tube voltage selection, integrated circuit detector and advanced iterative reconstruction on radiation dose and image quality of 3rd generation dual-source aortic CT angiography: An intra-individual comparison.

PURPOSE: To compare, on an intra-individual basis, the effect of automated tube voltage selection (ATVS), integrated circuit detector and advanced iterative reconstruction on radiation dose and image quality of aortic CTA studies using 2nd and 3rd generation dual-source CT (DSCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 32 patients who had undergone CTA of the entire aorta with both 2nd generation DSCT at 120kV using filtered back projection (FBP) (protocol 1) and 3rd generation DSCT using ATVS, an integrated circuit detector and advanced iterative reconstruction (protocol 2). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Image quality was subjectively evaluated using a five-point scale. Radiation dose parameters were recorded. RESULTS: All studies were considered of diagnostic image quality. CNR was significantly higher with protocol 2 (15.0±5.2 vs 11.0±4.2; p<.0001). Subjective image quality analysis revealed no significant differences for evaluation of attenuation (p=0.08501) but image noise was rated significantly lower with protocol 2 (p=0.0005). Mean tube voltage and effective dose were 94.7±14.1kV and 6.7±3.9mSv with protocol 2; 120±0kV and 11.5±5.2mSv with protocol 1 (p<0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Aortic CTA performed with 3rd generation DSCT, ATVS, integrated circuit detector, and advanced iterative reconstruction allow a substantial reduction of radiation exposure while improving image quality in comparison to 120kV imaging with FBP.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance reference ranges for the heart and aorta in Chinese at 3T.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) reference ranges have not been well established in Chinese. Here we determined normal cardiac and aortic reference ranges in healthy Singaporean Chinese and investigated how these data might affect clinical interpretation of CMR scans. METHODS: In 180 healthy Singaporean Chinese (20 to 69 years old; males, n = 91), comprehensive cardiac assessment was performed using the steady state free precision technique (3T Ingenia, Philips) and images were analysed by two independent observers (CMR42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging). Measurements were internally validated using standardized approaches: left ventricular mass (LVM) was measured in diastole and systole (with and without papillary muscles) and stroke volumes were compared in both ventricles. All reference ranges were stratified by sex and age; and "indeterminate/borderline" regions were defined statistically at the limits of the normal reference ranges. Results were compared with clinical measurements reported in the same individuals. RESULTS: LVM was equivalent in both phases (mean difference 3.0 ± 2.5 g; P = 0.22) and stroke volumes were not significantly different in the left and right ventricles (P = 0.91). Compared to females, males had larger left and right ventricular volumes (P < 0.001 for all). Indexed LVM was significantly higher in males compared to females (50 ± 7 versus 38 ± 5 g/m2, respectively; P < 0.001). Overall, papillary muscles accounted for only ~2% of the total LVM. Indexed atrial sizes and aortic root dimensions were similar between males and females (P > 0.05 for all measures). In both sexes, age correlated negatively with left and right ventricular volumes; and positively with aortic sinus and sinotubular junction diameters (P < 0.0001 for all). There was excellent agreement in indexed stroke volumes in the left and right ventricles (0.1±5.7 mL/m2, 0.7±6.2 mL/m2, respectively), LVM (0.6±6.4 g/m2), atrial sizes and aortic root dimensions between values reported in clinical reports and our measured reference ranges. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive sex and age-corrected CMR reference ranges at 3T have been established in Singaporean Chinese. This is an important step for clinical practice and research studies of the heart and aorta in Asia.

Standardized Protocol to Analyze Computed Tomography Imaging of Type B Aortic Dissections.

PURPOSE: To propose a standard measuring protocol for type B aortic dissections so as to improve comparability between studies reporting aortic dimensions. METHODS: Fifteen computed tomography (CT) scans of type B aortic dissections were measured with a standard protocol by 2 independent observers using postprocessing software. The following parameters were assessed: true, false, and total lumen diameter; true and false lumen volume; and entry tear size, location, and number. Diameters were measured in a perpendicular plane at 2, 10, and 20 cm from the left subclavian artery and 5 cm from the most distal renal artery. True lumen volume was assessed from the left subclavian artery to the aortic bifurcation, while the false lumen volume was from the start to end up to the aortic bifurcation. Entry tear location was assessed in relation to the left subclavian artery. Intra- and interobserver repeatability and agreement were evaluated using the Bland-Altman method, an a priori set of acceptable differences, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC). RESULTS: Intra- and interobserver mean differences for aortic diameter and true and false lumen volumes were generally within the limits of agreement and the a priori differences; the LCCC showed excellent agreement. Entry tear location, size, and number were difficult to measure in a repeatable manner, with inconsistent correlation coefficients, especially between the 2 observers. CONCLUSION: This protocol showed acceptable repeatability for aortic diameter and aortic volume measurements. Assessment of entry tears proved challenging and associated with less favorable results. Additionally, investigators are urged to be more transparent regarding the measurement methodology used in studies describing aortic dimensions.

The Need for Standardized Methods for Measuring the Aorta: Multimodality Core Lab Experience From the GenTAC Registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate variability in aortic measurements with multiple imaging modalities in clinical centers by comparing with a standardized measuring protocol implemented in a core laboratory. BACKGROUND: In patients with aortic disease, imaging of thoracic aorta plays a major role in risk stratifying individuals for life-threatening complications and in determining timing of surgical intervention. However, standardization of the procedures for performance of aortic measurements is lacking. METHODS: To characterize the diversity of methods used in clinical practice, we compared aortic measurements performed by echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the 6 GenTAC (National Registry of Genetically Triggered Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Cardiovascular Conditions) clinical centers to those performed at the imaging core laboratory in 965 studies. Each center acquired and analyzed their images according to local protocols. The same images were subsequently analyzed blindly by the core laboratory, on the basis of a standardized protocol for all imaging modalities. Paired measurements from clinical centers and core laboratory were compared by mean of differences and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: For all segments of the ascending aorta, echocardiography showed a higher ICC (0.84 to 0.93) than CT (0.84) and MRI (0.82 to 0.90), with smaller mean of differences. MRI showed higher ICC for the arch and descending aorta (0.91 and 0.93). In a mixed adjusted model, the different imaging modalities and clinical centers were identified as sources of variability between clinical and core laboratory measurements, whereas age groups or diagnosis at enrollment were not. CONCLUSIONS: By comparing core laboratory with measurements from clinical centers, our study identified important sources of variability in aortic measurements. Furthermore, our findings with regard to CT and MRI suggest a need for imaging societies to work toward the development of unifying acquisition protocols and common measuring methods.

Compliance of postendovascular aortic aneurysm repair imaging surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: Imaging surveillance after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is critical. In this study we analyzed compliance with imaging surveillance after EVAR and its effect on clinical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 565 EVAR patients (August 2001-November 2013), who were followed using duplex ultrasound and/or computed tomography angiography. Patients were considered noncompliant (NC) if they did not have any follow-up imaging for 2 years and/or missed their first post-EVAR imaging over 6 months. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare compliance rates in EVAR patients with hostile neck (HN) vs favorable neck (FN) anatomy (according to instructions for use). A multivariate analysis was also done to correlate compliance and comorbidities. RESULTS: Forty-three percent were compliant (7% had no follow-up imaging) and 57% were NC. The mean follow-up for compliant patients was 25.4 months (0-119 months) vs 31.4 months for NC (0-140 months). The mean number of imaging was 3.5 for compliant vs 2.6 for NC (P < .0001). Sixty-four percent were NC for HN patients vs 50% for FN patients (P = .0007). The rates of compliance at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years for all patients were 78%, 63%, 55%, 45%, and 32%; and 84%, 68%, 61%, 54%, and 40% for FN patients; and 73%, 57%, 48%, 37%, and 25% for HN patients (P = .009). The NC rate for patients with late endoleak and/or sac expansion was 58% vs 54% for patients with no endoleak (P = .51). The NC rate for patients with late reintervention was 70% vs 53% for patients with no reintervention (P = .1254). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that patients with peripheral arterial disease had an odds ratio of 1.9 (P = .0331), patients with carotid disease had an odds ratio of 2 (P = .0305), and HN patients had an odds ratio of 1.8 (P = .0007) for NC. Age and residential locations were not factors in compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, compliance of imaging surveillance after EVAR was low, particularly in HN EVAR patients, and additional studies are needed to determine if strict post-EVAR surveillance is necessary, and its effect on long-term clinical outcome.

Imaging After Nellix Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing: A Consensus Document.

Endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) using the Nellix system is a new and different method of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Normal postoperative imaging has unique appearances that change with time; complications also have different and specific appearances. This consensus document on the imaging findings after Nellix EVAS is based on the collective experience of the sites involved in the Nellix EVAS Global Forward Registry and the US Investigational Device Exemption Trial. The normal findings on computed tomography (CT), duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiography are described. With time, endobag appearances change on CT due to contrast migration to the margins of the hydrogel polymer within the endobag. Air within the endobag also has unique appearances that change over time. Among the complications after Nellix EVAS, type I endoleak usually presents as a curvilinear area of flow between the endobag and aortic wall, while type II endoleak is typically small and usually occurs where an aortic branch artery lies adjacent to an irregular aortic blood lumen that is not completely filled by the endobag. Procedural aortic injury is an uncommon but important complication that occurs as a result of overfilling of the endobags during Nellix EVAS. The optimum imaging surveillance algorithm after Nellix EVAS has yet to be defined but is largely CT-based, especially in the first year postprocedure. However, duplex ultrasound also appears to be a sensitive modality in identifying normal appearances and complications.

Comparative assessment of ascending aortic aneurysms in Marfan patients using ECG-gated computerized tomographic angiography versus trans-thoracic echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is routinely used as a complementary technique to trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) for assessing thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA). However different measures can be obtained on CT and there are no recommendations on which to use. The objective was to determine which CT measurements most closely match reference TTE measurements in Marfan patients with TAA. METHODS: TTE measurements were obtained using the leading edge-to-leading edge technique in end-diastole on the parasternal longitudinal view. ECG-gated CT measurements were obtained, using the inner-to-inner technique in end-diastole by double oblique reconstruction: on three-cavity view (3C), left ventricle-aorta view (LVAo), and strict transverse plane passing through the maximal diameter "cusp to commissure" and "cusp to cusp" for each cusp. CT and TTE were performed within one month. RESULTS: 44 Marfan patients (39 ± 19 years, 48% men) were included. Dilatation of the ascending aorta was maximal at the level of the sinuses (TTE diameters: mean 47.5 ± 5.3 mm). TTE diameters were similar to 3C, LVAo (mean differences: 2.2 and -0.1 mm, p=NS) and to the three "cusp to cusp" diameters (mean differences ranging from 0 to 1.1mm, p=NS), whereas "cusp to commissure" diameters were all statistically smaller than TTE (3.6 mm, 2.9 mm and 3.7 mm, p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Inner-to-inner "cusp to cusp" diameter measured on an ECG-gated CT should be used for comparison with 2D TTE aortic diameter at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms.

Aortic 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake pattern at 60 min (early) and 180 min (delayed) acquisition in a control population: a visual and semiquantitative comparative analysis.

18F-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (F-FDG) PET/CT acquisition is generally performed 60 min after injection. The normal biodistribution pattern of F-FDG includes activity in the aortic territory due to blood pool activity, which could interfere in the diagnosis of aortic diseases by overlapping the wall uptake. The aim of the study was to evaluate the change over time of F-FDG uptake by the aortic wall and the activity in the lumen in a control population and to establish normal reference values. This prospective study included 15 control patients (mean age: 58.2 years). PET/CT was acquired 60 min (early scan) and 180 min (delayed scan) after an F-FDG injection at a dose of 7 MBq/kg. A visual and semiquantitative analysis of the F-FDG aortic wall uptake was carried out, and lumen activity and the aortic wall to lumen ratio [target-to-background ratio (TBR)] were determined. In the visual analysis all patients showed F-FDG activity at the aortic territory at 60 and 180 min. The pattern of uptake at 60 min was diffuse in all 15 patients (100%), without delineation of the aortic wall uptake; however, at 180 min the uptake pattern of the aortic wall changed to lineal in 14 patients (93.3%). The aortic wall maximum standardized uptake value decreased from 2.07±0.34 to 1.7±0.46 during the delayed acquisition (P=0.0279) and the lumen maximum standardized uptake value decreased highly significantly (1.99±0.35 vs. 1.36±0.32, P=0.0001). Therefore, TBR also increased highly significantly from 1.04±0.06 to 1.25±0.16 (P<0.0001). The high decrease in blood pool activity from 60 to 180 min provides a better delineation of the aortic wall uptake, which corresponds to the normal pattern at that time. The TBR increased significantly at 180 min, and 1.25±0.16 is suggested as the threshold for diagnostic purposes, especially for the diagnosis of vasculitis.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pulsatile abdominal mass, suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Clinical palpation of a pulsating abdominal mass alerts the clinician to the presence of a possible abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Generally an arterial aneurysm is defined as a localized arterial dilatation ≥50% greater than the normal diameter. Imaging studies are important in diagnosing the cause of a pulsatile abdominal mass and, if an AAA is found, in determining its size and involvement of abdominal branches. Ultrasound (US) is the initial imaging modality of choice when a pulsatile abdominal mass is present. Noncontrast computed tomography (CT) may be substituted in patients for whom US is not suitable. When aneurysms have reached the size threshold for intervention or are clinically symptomatic, contrast-enhanced multidetector CT angiography (CTA) is the best diagnostic and preintervention planning study, accurately delineating the location, size, and extent of aneurysm and the involvement of branch vessels. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) may be substituted if CT cannot be performed. Catheter arteriography has some utility in patients with significant contraindications to both CTA and MRA. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria(®) are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Assessment of aortic root dimensions in patients with suspected Marfan syndrome: intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced and non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography with echocardiography.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to evaluate intraindividually the performance of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and non-contrast MRA for aortic root diameter measurements and to compare the results with routinely performed echocardiography in patients with suspected Marfan syndrome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Aortic roots were examined prospectively in 51 consecutive patients with suspected Marfan syndrome by using contrast-enhanced MRA and non-contrast MRA at 1.5 T. Two readers independently measured aortic root diameters at the annulus, sinuses of Valsalva and sinutubular junction in both data sets and compared results with echocardiographic data. Intraclass correlation coefficient, Pearson correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman, and two-sided t-test were used to assess agreement between observers and methods. RESULTS: 38 (74.5%) of the 51 patients (25 female, 26 male; mean age 37.1 ± 13.7 years) had Marfan syndrome. Both, contrast-enhanced MRA and non-contrast MRA measurements of the sinuses of Valsalva revealed a strong correlation with echocardiography (r=0.850 and r=0.893, respectively). Intraclass correlation was markedly better for non-enhanced MRA (r=0.904) when compared to contrast-enhanced MRA (r=0.690). Image quality (p<0.001) as well as interobserver agreement (p<0.0042) of measurements of the sinuses of Valsalva was significantly better for non-enhanced MRA than for contrast-enhanced MRA. CONCLUSION: Non-contrast MRA was more reliable and more valid than contrast-enhanced MRA for assessment of aortic root dimensions in patients with suspected Marfan syndrome. Therefore contrast agents can be omitted for establishing the diagnosis of aortic involvement in Marfan syndrome.