The fate of the malrotated elbow supracondylar fractures in children: is varus really a problem?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the functional and cosmetic effects of elbow supracondylar fractures (SCF) in children with residual rotational deformity. METHODS: Retrospective review cohort of patients with evidence of malrotation after treatment for SCF. An analysis of the postoperative X-ray of 305 consecutive SCF type 3 treated surgically during five years identified 46 elbows with rotational deformity that fulfilled the selection criteria and were recalled for review; only 27 patients agreed to participate. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Clinically, the elbow and shoulder ROM were assessed. The postoperative fracture rotation (PFR) was radiologically measured using the Berdis method. Results were categorized according to Flynn criteria, and functional outcomes were evaluated with the QuickDASH questionnaire. On final assessment, a radiograph of both elbows was obtained, and measures were compared. Descriptive analysis was made calculating median, range, proportions, and confidence intervals. Non-parametric tests were used to test the association between variables. RESULTS: The group had a median age of four years and a median follow-up of 52 months. Shoulder rotation was asymmetrical in 13 patients; six patients presented a change on carrying angle > 5° (4 varus/2 valgus). The higher the residual rotation, the higher the chances of an altered shoulder rotation (for each degree of PFR, the shoulder rotation was changed to 0.4°). However, there was a low correlation between the amount of rotation and the final carrying angle (r = 0.37). According to Flynn's criteria, over 95% had excellent or good results. CONCLUSION: There was a weak correlation between varus and rotational malalignment. Patients with moderate residual malrotation could be expected to have a good outcome even if some shoulder rotation changes persist.

Augmented Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Structural Bioinductive Scaffold: A Biomechanical Study.

BACKGROUND: Elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair with suture brace augmentation shows good time-zero biomechanical strength and a more rapid return to play compared with UCL reconstruction. However, there are concerns about overconstraint or stress shielding with nonabsorbable suture tape. Recently, a collagen-based bioinductive absorbable structural scaffold has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for augmentation of soft tissue repair. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to assess the initial biomechanical performance of UCL repair augmented with this scaffold. We hypothesized that adding the bioinductive absorbable structural scaffold to primary UCL repair would impart additional time-zero restraint to the valgus opening. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eight cadaveric elbow specimens-from midforearm to midhumerus-were utilized. In the native state, elbows underwent valgus stress testing at 30o, 60o, and 90o of flexion, with a cyclical valgus rotational torque. Changes in valgus rotation from 2- to 5-N·m torque were recorded as valgus gapping. Testing was then performed in 4 states: (1) native intact UCL-with dissection through skin, fascia, and muscle down to an intact UCL complex; (2) UCL-transected-distal transection of the ligament off the sublime tubercle; (3) augmented repair with bioinductive absorbable scaffold; and (4) repair alone without scaffold. The order of testing of repair states was alternated to account for possible plastic deformation during testing. RESULTS: The UCL-transected state showed the greatest increase in valgus gapping of all states at all flexion angles. Repair alone showed similar valgus gapping to that of the UCL-transected state at 30° (P = .62) and 60° of flexion (P = .11). Bioinductive absorbable scaffold-augmented repair showed less valgus gapping compared with repair alone at all flexion angles (P = .021, P = .024, and P = .024 at 30°, 60°, and 90°, respectively). Scaffold-augmented repair showed greater gapping compared with the native state at 30° (P = .021) and 90° (P = .039) but not at 60° of flexion (P = .059). There was no difference when testing augmented repair or repair alone first. CONCLUSION: UCL repair augmented with a bioinductive, biocomposite absorbable structural scaffold imparts additional biomechanical strength to UCL repair alone, without overconstraint beyond the native state. Further comparative studies are warranted. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As augmented primary UCL repair becomes more commonly performed, use of an absorbable bioinductive scaffold may allow for improved time-zero mechanical strength, and thus more rapid rehabilitation, while avoiding long-term overconstraint or stress shielding.

Long-terms outcomes of radial head arthroplasty using a bipolar prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: In acute treatment of radial head fractures, a radial head prosthesis can be considered if open reduction and internal fixation are not technically feasible. METHODS: We reviewed the data of 27 consecutive bipolar Judet radial head prostheses implanted in patients with unreconstructable radial head fractures and no other concomitant fractures (coronoid or olecranon factures). The lesions of the lateral collateral ligament were rated according to the McKee classification. Twenty-three patients with more than ten-year follow-up participated in this retrospective study All patients underwent assessments for pain, range of motion and stability using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the QuickDash questionnaire and a Visual Analogue Scale for pain. Radiography assessment was performed to determine the correct setting of the implant, presence of periprosthetic loosening, prosthetic disassembly, heterotopic ossification, capitellum and ulnohumeral degenerative changes. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 149 months (± 12.2). Mean range of motion in flexion-extension was 111° (± 10.55), mean extension was 18° (± 14.32) and mean flexion was 130° (± 11.4). Mean arc of motion in supination-pronation was 150° (± 12.26). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 88, the mean QuickDash score was 7.3; 86% of the patients were satisfied. Seven patients (26%) required secondary surgery. The most frequent complication was heterotopic ossification, which had negative consequences on the functional result. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar radial head prostheses are an option for acute treatment of isolated unreconstructable radial head fractures. During follow-up, three patients required implant revision and removal; the capitellum surface presented severe degenerative changes and the prosthesis was not replaced. Another complication was the risk of implant dislocation, in relation to implant design, incorrect positioning of the radial head stem or else to inadequate reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament. Further work is needed to establish the long-term follow-up results of Judet implants in complex elbow fractures.

Early range of motion results in good elbow function following conservative treatment of non-displaced radial head fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the range of motion (ROM), elbow function and predictors for good elbow function after conservative treatment of non-displaced radial head fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with non-displaced radial head fractures (displacement < 2 mm), that were diagnosed between January 1st 2017 and December 31st 2021 in a level I trauma center, were included in this retrospective case series and the charts were evaluated for ROM and elbow function. Elbow function was categorized as "good" or "bad" depending on the ROM measured defined by Morrey et al. Overall, 73 patients (33 male, 40 female) with an average age of 38 years (+/- 13 years) could be included. RESULTS: Conservative treatment had good clinical results for ROM and elbow function. After 6 weeks mean flexion was 131° (SD 13°), extension 8° (SD 7°), Pronation 83° (SD 11°) and Supination 83° (SD 13). Patients with a good elbow function after one week showed a good elbow function after completing the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical assessment after one week should always be performed and the study showed that it is a good predictor for good elbow function. In cases of bad elbow function further controls should be considered.

Does the ulnohumeral angle have a role in the aetiopathogenesis of lateral epicondylitis?

The pathophysiology of lateral epicondylitis (LE) remains not fully elucidated, as it involves a complex interaction of anatomical structures. The primary objective of the research is to identify a potential relationship between LE and the ulnohumeral angle (UHA), which demonstrates the coronal alignment of the elbow. Patients diagnosed with LE between September 1st, 2020, and September 1st, 2023, were retrospectively examined. Demographic information and UHA measurements of patients meeting the inclusion criteria and a control group with similar criteria were collected. Measurements were independently conducted by 2 orthopedists at a 2-week interval and compared. Among 413 patients meeting the inclusion criteria and the control group comprising 420 patients, there were no significant differences in age, gender, and side (P = .447, P = .288, P = .159, respectively). The mean UHA for the LE group was 13.49 ±â€…4.24, while for the control group, it was 12.82 ±â€…9.19, showing a significant difference (P = .026). The inter-observer and intraobserver reliability of the angle measurements were both above 0.80. We hypothesize that the increase in UHA in patients with LE reflects an adaptive change secondary to compressive forces acting on the lateral aspect of the elbow. This study is the first to describe the relationship between LE and UHA based on anatomical-biomechanical foundations, suggesting a cause-and-effect relationship. Further studies are warranted to delve deeper into this relationship.

Does the coronoid fracture in terrible triad injury always need to be fixed?

BACKGROUND: The ideal treatment of terrble triad injuries and whether fixation of coronoid process fractures is needed or not are still debated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate if terrible triad injuries necessitate coronoid fracture fixation and evaluate if non-fixation treatments have similar efficacies and outcomes as fixation-treatments in cases of terrible triad injuries. METHODS: From August 2011 to July 2020, 23 patients with acute terrible triad injuries without involvement of the anteromedial facet of the coronoid process were included to evaluate the postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes (minimum follow-up of 20 months). According to the preoperative height loss evaluation of the coronoid process and an intraoperative elbow stability test, seven patients underwent coronoid fracture fixation, and the other eight patients were treated conservatively. The elbow range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and modified Broberg-Morrey score were evaluated at the last follow-up. In addition, plain radiographs were reviewed to evaluate joint congruency, fracture union, heterotopic ossification, and the development of arthritic changes. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, the mean arcs of flexion-extension and supination-pronation values were 118.2° and 146.8° in the fixation group and 122.5° and 151.3° in the non-fixation group, respectively. The mean MEPSs were 96.4 in the fixation group (excellent, nine cases; good, tow cases) and 96.7 in the non-fixation group (excellent, ten cases; good, two cases). The mean modified Broberg-Morrey scores were 94.0 in the fixation group (excellent, sevev cases; good, four cases) and 94.0 in the non-fixation group (excellent, ten cases; good, tow cases). No statistically significant differences in clinical scores and ROM were identified between the two groups. However, the non-fixation group showed a significantly lower height loss of the coronoid process than the fixation group (36.3% versus 54.5%). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the fixation and non-fixation groups in terrible triad injuries.

Radiologic, clinical, and functional evaluation of children with displaced T-condylar fractures treated by closed reduction and percutaneous fixation using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.

PURPOSE: T-condylar (T-C) fractures of the distal humerus are rare in children. There is no accepted treatment for such an injury, and there is a lack of reports evaluating the outcome of T-C fractures treated by closed reduction and percutaneous fixation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of closed reduction and percutaneous K-wire and screw (CRPKS) fixation in patients with type II and III T-C fractures according to the Toniolo-Wilkins classification modified by Canavese et al. (TWC classification). METHODS: The clinical data of 12 consecutive patients (8 males, 4 females) who were younger than 14 years of age and who had a T-C fracture that was managed by CRPKS were retrospectively evaluated. Fractures were classified according to the TWC classification. The baseline information of the patients, carrying angle (CA) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were used to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes; related complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The mean age at the time of injury was 11.6 ± 1.8 years (range, 8-14). The time from injury to surgical treatment was 1.5 ± 1.0 days (range, 0-3), and the mean follow-up duration was 33.7 ± 12.3 months (range, 18-61). Surgery lasted 45.7 ± 7.6 min on average (range, 35-58). All fractures healed in 4.9 ± 1.0 weeks on average (range, 4-7). At the last follow-up visit, the CA was 12.6° ± 5.8° on the injured side and 13.8° ± 1.8° on the uninjured side (p=0.432). The MEPS was 100 (95, 100) on the injured side and 100 (100, 100) on the uninjured side (p=0.194). Three complications were recorded. CONCLUSION: Good functional and radiological outcomes can be expected in pediatric patients with type II and III T-C fractures treated by CRPKS. The technique is relatively simple to perform and has a lower rate of complications.

Conversion from Spanning External Fixation to Open Reduction Internal Fixation Contributes to Healing of Soft Tissues and Fractures in Open Distal Humeral Fractures.

BACKGROUND Open distal humeral fractures (DHFs) often lead to loss of elbow function, thereby seriously affecting patient quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes of 2 surgical techniques to determine the better method for repairing open DHFs. Both groups were treated with immediate debridement first, and then group I had only internal fixation (IF), while group II underwent initial external fixation (EF) followed by IF surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study included 32 patients who had open DHFs between 2013 and 2018. Twelve patients underwent thorough debridement and temporary EF treatment and converted to IF as the ultimate treatment. Twenty patients were treated with immediate open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Data of final treatment outcomes were analyzed at the latest follow-up. A comparative analysis of radiological results, function observations, and complications was performed for the 2 surgical groups. RESULTS All DHFs and osteotomized olecranon united after a mean of 5.2±1.21 months. No significant differences were observed in other preoperative demographic data between the 2 groups. Moreover, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications, elbow range of motion, or fracture healing time between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS The evidence provided by our study highlights the efficacy of definitive IF in treating open DHFs, which is recommended whenever possible. Furthermore, the combination of EF and ORIF, according to the type of soft tissue damage, may be a promising treatment option with a low revision rate for patients with open DHFs.

Changes in elbow joint contact area in symptomatic valgus instability of the elbow in baseball players.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the joint contact area of the dominant side and that of the non-dominant side without valgus instability in symptomatic pitchers. Ten symptomatic elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) deficient baseball pitchers participated in this study. Computed tomography (CT) data from the dominant and non-dominant elbows were obtained with and without elbow valgus stress. The CT imaging data of each elbow joint were reconstructed using a 3D reconstruction software package, and the radiocapitellar and ulnohumeral joint contact areas were calculated. The center of the contact area and the translation from the position without stress to the position with valgus stress were also calculated. With elbow valgus stress, the contact area changed, and the center of the radiocapitellar joint contact area translated significantly more laterally in the dominant elbow than in the non-dominant elbow (p = 0.0361). In addition, the center of the ulnohumeral joint contact area translated significantly more posteriorly in the dominant elbow than in the non-dominant elbow (p = 0.0413). These changes in contact areas could be the reason for cartilage injury at the posterior trochlea in pitchers with UCL deficiency.

Radiocapitellar joint pressures following transradial amputation increase during elbow motion.

This study aimed to compare the contact area, mean pressure, and peak pressure of the radiocapitellar joint (RCJ) in the upper limb after transradial amputation with those of the normal upper limb during elbow flexion and forearm rotation. Testing was performed using ten fresh-frozen upper limbs, and the transradial amputation was performed 5 cm proximal to the radial styloid process. The specimens were connected to a custom-designed apparatus for testing. A pressure sensor was inserted into the RCJ. The biomechanical indices of the RCJ were measured during elbow flexion and forearm rotation in all specimens. There was no significant difference in the contact area between the normal and transradial amputated upper limbs. However, in the upper limbs after transradial amputation, the mean pressure was higher than that in the normal upper limbs at all positions of elbow flexion and forearm rotation. The peak pressure was significantly higher in the upper limbs after transradial amputation than in the normal upper limbs, and was especially increased during pronation at 45° of elbow flexion. In conclusion, these results could cause cartilage erosion in the RCJ of transradial amputees. Thus, methods to reduce the pressure of the RCJ should be considered when a myoelectric prosthesis is developed.

Lateral entry pins and Slongo's external fixation: which method is more ideal for older children with supracondylar humeral fractures?

OBJECTIVE: The standard surgical treatment for supracondylar humeral fractures in children is closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Given the need for greater fixation strength and higher risk of joint stiffness for children older than 8 years, external fixation is often performed for treating supracondylar humeral fractures in older children. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of lateral entry pins and Slongo's external fixation for treating supracondylar humeral fractures in older children. METHODS: Children older than 8 years who underwent surgery for supracondylar humeral fractures at our hospital for surgery from January 2016 to December 2020 are to be retrospectively assessed. One group (n = 36) underwent internal fixation and percutaneous pinning with three lateral Kirschner wires, and the other group (n = 32) underwent Slongo's external fixator surgery. The demographic data, operation duration, number of fluoroscopies, and fracture healing time were compared between both groups. The elbow joint function was evaluated 6 months after the surgery on the basis of fracture healing time, lifting angle, elbow joint range of motion (ROM), and Flynn score. The incidence of postoperative complications was also recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two patient groups in terms of the demographic parameters. Compared to external fixation surgery, Kirschner wire surgery required shorter duration and fewer fluoroscopies (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, the fracture healing time was significantly less (P < 0.05), and the elbow ROM and Flynn scores were higher in the external fixator group compared to the Kirschner wire fixation group (P < 0.05). There was one case of secondary fracture displacement in the Kirschner wire group and one of pin tract infection in the external fixator group. No other iatrogenic injuries or complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Maybe Slongo's external fixator is a suitable alternative treatment option for supracondylar humeral fractures in children older than 8 years since it can achieve better fixation strength and early restoration of elbow joint movement with a lower risk of joint stiffness.

A double-closed wedge broken-line osteotomy for cubitus varus deformity.

ABSTRACT: Various osteotomy methods have been proposed in the treatment of cubitus varus. We designed an improved stepped osteotomy to achieve improved deformity correction. We refer to this new approach as double-closed wedge broken-line osteotomy and report a series of clinical and imaging results (deformity correction, range of motion [ROM], function, osteotomy healing, and complications) of patients with cubitus varus treated with this technique.Between July 2014 and July 2019, we treated 9 cases of cubitus varus using the new technique. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Shenzhen Children's Hospital. We obtained written parental consent for the minors before the study was begun. We compared preoperative and postoperative clinical and imaging parameters (humeral elbow-wrist angle, elbow ROM) in all patients. Postoperative evaluation was performed by telephone interview and outpatient review. The median follow-up was 23.2 months (range, 3-63 months).The median humeral elbow-wrist angle modified from -14.27 to 15.15. The median clinical and imaging parameters after correction of deformity were not different from that of the normal side. Using our rehabilitation program, all patients recovered preoperative elbow ROM at the last follow-up.Our double-closed wedge broken-line osteotomy has a larger cancellous bone contact surface. The deformity correction is satisfactory, the osteotomy healing is reliable, and the incidence of complications is low.Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Characteristics of Cubitus Varus Deformity after Lateral Condylar Fracture of the Humerus.

Background: Lateral humeral condylar fractures often heal with some residual elbow deformity. However, details of angulation or tilting angle of the lateral condyle after the fracture have not been evaluated so far. Methods: Between 2008 and 2016, we followed up 80 mild fractures of the lateral humeral condyle for more than a year. Thirty fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with Kirschner wires. Fifty cases were treated with a long arm splint for 3 weeks (Fig. 1). The average age of the patients at the time of the injury was 5.5 years. The humerus-elbow-wrist angle (HEWA), Baumann's angle (BA), and tilting angle (TA) were measured on the radiographs. The active range of motion (ROM) was clinically assessed at unaffected and affected sides at the final follow-up. Results: No significant differences were detected between the sides about TA or ROM at the final follow-up. However, HEWA/ BA showed more significant loss of correction. There were significant differences in BA at the affected side between the ORIF and splint groups. Conclusions: Cubitus varus deformity after lateral humeral condylar fracture is not accompanied by a change in TA or ROM, unlike the deformity after supracondylar or distal epiphyseal fracture of the humerus (Fig. 2). Operative treatment to precisely correct and fix the lateral condylar fracture still retained some cubitus varus deformity, although it might lessen or prevent the deformity when compared to conservative treatment with a splint.

Importance of detection of capitellar cartilage injuries concomitant with isolated radial head fractures: A retrospective clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the injury pattern and clinical importance of concomitant capitellar cartilage defects (CCDs) among patients treated surgically for radial head fracture (RHF). METHODS: A total of 74 patients who were treated surgically for isolated RHFs were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 12 patients with CCDs (16.2%) were classified as Group I (10 men; mean age, 41.3±12.8 years) and the remaining 62 patients without CCD as Group II (control group) (48 men; mean age, 50.8±13 years). The mean follow-up was 21.3±3.2 months in Group I and 18.7±6.4 in Group II. In Group I, 11 patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation, whereas 1 patient was treated by radial head resection. The preoperative range of motion (ROM) was recorded; the severity of RHF was assessed using the Mason classification. The location, size, and thickness of CCD injuries at the time of surgery were also documented. At the final follow-up, radiological assessment was performed to determine the bone union, and clinical measurements, including ROM and the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), were performed. The clinical features of the 2 groups were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: In Group I, 10 patients showed limited forearm rotation. CCD was located posterolaterally in 11 patients and anterolaterally in 1 patient. At the final follow-up, 11 patients from Group I who underwent open reduction and internal fixation showed complete union of RHF and full recovery of pronation and supination. According to the MEPS, 9 patients exhibited excellent results, and 3 patients exhibited good results. In Group I, RHFs were classified as Mason type II in 7 patients (58.3%) and type III in 4 patients (58.3%). In Group II, RHFs were type II in 45 patients (72.6%) and type III in 17 patients (27.4%). In comparative analyses, there was a significant difference in age (41.3±12.8 versus 50.8±13.0, p=0.041) between the 2 groups. Preoperative pronation/supination was higher in Group II (131.7±36.2) than in Group I (106.3±31.6) (p=0.021). There were no significant differences in sex (p=0.097), follow-up period (p=0.326), Mason type (p=0.482), preoperative extension/flexion (102.3±43.3 [Group I] versus 107.6±44.9 [Group II]) (p=0.584), final follow-up extension/flexion (133.3±10.7 [Group I] versus 126.9±21.2 [Group II]) (p=0.384), pronation/supination (151.2±9.1 [Group I] versus 151.2±13.3 [Group II]) (p=0.558), and the MEPSs (92.9±6.6 [Group I] versus 93.3±7.5 [Group II]) (p=0.701). CONCLUSION: If a thorough physical examination of a patient with RHF reveals limited forearm rotation, effort must be made to identify the cause, and the possibility of CCD must be considered. Moreover, there is a need for careful observation during RHF surgery for not only fracture reduction or fixation but also possible CCD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Surgical Reconstruction of Isolated Upper Trunk Brachial Plexus Birth Injuries in the Presence of an Avulsed C5 or C6 Nerve Root.

BACKGROUND: Avulsion of either the C5 or C6 root with intact middle and lower trunks in brachial plexus birth injury is rare. In these cases, only 1 proximal root is available for intraplexal reconstruction. The purpose of the present study was to determine the outcomes of these patients when single-root reconstruction was balanced across the anterior and posterior elements of the upper trunk. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data for patients with brachial plexus birth injury who underwent primary nerve reconstruction between 1993 and 2014. Patients were included who had isolated upper-trunk injuries with intact middle and lower trunks. The study group had avulsion of either the C5 or C6 root. The control group had neuroma-in-continuity or ruptures of the upper trunk. Outcomes were assessed with use of the Active Movement Scale and the Brachial Plexus Outcome Measure. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized to evaluate changes across treatment. RESULTS: Ten patients with brachial plexus birth injury were included in the avulsion cohort. Surgical reconstruction entailed neuroma resection and nerve grafting from the single available root balanced across all distal targets with or without spinal accessory-to-suprascapular nerve transfer. Significant improvements were observed across treatment for both the avulsion and control groups in terms of shoulder abduction, shoulder flexion, external rotation, elbow flexion, and supination. At a mean follow-up of 54.5 ± 8.8 months, patients in the avulsion group achieved Active Movement Scale scores of 6.8 ± 0.4 for elbow flexion and 6.5 ± 0.9 for shoulder flexion and abduction, with lesser recovery observed in external rotation (3.3 ± 2.8). All patients available for Brachial Plexus Outcome Measure assessments demonstrated functional movement. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of avulsion of 1 upper-trunk root, nerve reconstruction by grafting of the upper trunk from the other upper-trunk root provides improved movement, high Active Movement Scale scores, and satisfactory function according to the Brachial Plexus Outcome Measure. These data provide support for a strategy that ensures the entire upper trunk is adequately reconstructed in the setting of upper-trunk lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Relationship between upper limb injuries and hip range of motion and strength in high school baseball pitchers.

We aimed to examine the relationship between hip range of motion (ROM) and abduction strength and throwing-related shoulder/elbow injuries in high school baseball pitchers. The study included 135 baseball pitchers. We asked them to fill out a questionnaire at the checkups, that included the dominant arm and the years of baseball experience. To avoid a confirmation bias, the examiners were blinded to the participants' hand dominance. All players underwent physical function measurements, such as height, weight, shoulder and hip strength, and shoulder and hip ROM. Shoulder and elbow injury was defined as shoulder and elbow pain that the patient had been aware of in the past 3 years. The results of injured and non-injured pitchers were compared. Eighty-five pitchers had experienced a shoulder or elbow injury in the past 3 years. The shoulder ROM and strength in the injured and non-injured groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent. The hip external rotation ROM on the dominant side, the hip abduction strength on the non-dominant side, and the hip abduction strength on the dominant side were significantly lower in the injured group than in the non-injured group. The results may contribute to reducing the incidence of these injuries.

Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Older Children: Success of Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of supracondylar humerus (SCH) fracture declines and fracture types change as children grow. Optimal treatment method is unclear in older children. The aim of the study was to determine if fracture type and configuration of distal humerus fractures changes as patients approach skeletal maturity, and to assess the success of closed reduction and percutaneous pin (CRPP) in extra-articular SCH fractures in this transitional age group. METHODS: Inclusion criteria for this retrospective review were (1) distal humerus fractures with extension types 2 and 3, flexion type, T-type; (2) surgically managed, and (3) modified Sauvegrain score ≥1. Reviewed parameters included fracture type and configuration, grade of skeletal maturity, fixation technique, and loss of reduction. Primary analysis was to determine the distribution of fracture type and configuration with age or grade of skeletal maturity. Secondary analysis was used to determine the factors affecting treatment success of CRPP in extra-articular fractures. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients were included (58 males and 84 females). Fracture types revealed significant changes with increased age (P=0.031) and skeletal maturity grade (P<0.005). Skeletal maturity was a better predictor of changing fracture type than chronological age. T-type fractures were only seen in patients with modified Sauvegrain score ≥6 and flexion-type fractures were only seen in patients with modified Sauvegrain score ≤4. Loss of reduction rate after CRPP was 5%. The success of CRPP was not affected by age, sex, modified Sauvegrain score, fracture type, direction of displacement, coronal fracture pattern, number of pins or medial pin use. Fracture obliquity in the sagittal plane (P=0.05), suboptimal pin spread (P<0.01), and lack of bicolumnar fixation (P<0.01) were found as statistically significant factors associated with failed CRPP. CONCLUSION: The distribution of fracture type changed with increased age and skeletal maturity. CRPP of extra-articular fractures in older children is a reliable option regardless of the stage of skeletal maturity. Determinants of a good outcome include optimal pinning technique with adequate pin spread at the fracture site and bicolumnar fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective case series.

Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis for lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Biceps tenotomy and biceps tenodesis are 2 most common surgical procedures for long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology, but debate still exists regarding the choice of treatment. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare clinical results between tenotomy and tenodesis for the treatment of lesions of LHBT. It was hypothesized that there is no difference in outcomes of tenotomy and tenodesis for lesions of LHBT. METHODS: A comprehensive search of literature published between 1980 and April 2020 was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tenotomy and tenodesis for LHBT lesions were included. The primary outcomes were Constant score and Popeye deformity. The secondary outcomes included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, muscle strength, cramping pain, and operative time. For primary outcomes, trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to reduce the risk of random errors and the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations) approach was used to assess the quality of the body of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 9 RCTs were included. In pooled analysis, statistical significance was observed in the Constant score (mean difference [MD], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-3.14; P = .04), Popeye deformity (risk ratio [RR], 0.33; 95% CI, 0.22-0.49; P < .00001) and operative time (MD, 9.94; 95% CI 8.39-11.50; P < .00001). However, there were no significant differences between the tenodesis and tenotomy in ASES score (P = .71), VAS for pain (P = .79), cumulative elbow flexion strength (P = .85), cumulative elbow supination strength (P = .23), and cramping pain (P = .61) TSA revealed that the results for Constant score was inconclusive. CONCLUSION: For the treatment of LHBT lesions, with the exception of constant score, there was no significant benefit of tenodesis over tenotomy. Although tenotomy is affected by a higher risk of Popeye sign, it is more timesaving.