Long-term outcomes of an extracorporeal irradiated autograft for limb salvage operations in musculoskeletal tumours: over ten years' observation.

AIMS: We analyzed the long-term outcomes of patients observed over ten years after resection en bloc and reconstruction with extracorporeal irradiated autografts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 27 patients who underwent resection en bloc and reimplantation of an extracorporeal irradiated autograft. The mean patient age and follow-up period were 31.7 years (9 to 59) and 16.6 years (10.3 to 24.3), respectively. The most common diagnosis was osteosarcoma (n = 10), followed by chondrosarcoma (n = 6). The femur (n = 13) was the most frequently involved site, followed by the tibia (n = 7). There were inlay grafts in five patients, intercalary grafts in 15 patients, and osteoarticular grafts in seven patients. Functional outcome was evaluated with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system. RESULTS: There were no recurrences in the irradiated autograft and the autograft survived in 24 patients (88.9%). Major complications included nonunion (n = 9), subchondral bone collapse (n = 4), and deep infection (n = 4). Although 34 revision procedures were performed, 25 (73.5%) and four (11.8%) of these were performed less than five years and ten years after the initial surgery, respectively. The mean MSTS score at the last follow-up was 84.3% (33% to 100%). CONCLUSION: Considering long-term outcomes, extracorporeal irradiated autograft is an effective method of reconstruction for malignant musculoskeletal tumours Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1151-1159.

Bone morphogenetic protein activity preservation with extracorporeal irradiation- and liquid nitrogen freezing-treated recycled autografts for biological reconstruction in malignant bone tumor.

Recycled autografts have been commonly used in biological reconstruction in conjunction with wide bone resection. Extracorporeal irradiation (ECIR) and freezing are the two major options for pretreating tumor-bearing autografts before transplant. This study, for the first time, compared the effects of these two techniques on bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 activity. Bone tissue extracted from human femoral heads were treated through either ECIR at different doses (5000, 15,000, and 30,000 rad) or liquid nitrogen (LN) freezing for different durations (5, 10, and 15 min). The amount of BMP was analyzed through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA assay). Furthermore, we also used tandem mass spectrometry to analyze change of BMP-2 and BMP-7 expression after high dosage of irradiation (30,000 rad) and long-time of freezing (15 min). To directly evaluate the effect of ECIR or LN freezing treatment on the activity of BMP, commercial recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) was added to the culture of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). The post-treatment activity of rhBMP-2 was quantitated by measuring the osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs with Alizarin Red S staining. Through Western blotting, the activation of the BMP signaling pathway by phospho-Smad antibodies was analyzed. Our results showed that post-treatment levels of BMP did not differ among the ECIR and LN freezing treatments in ELISA assay, but tandem mass spectrometry showed significantly lower expression of BMP-2 after 30,000 rad of irradiation. Both ECIR and freezing lowered the expression of regulatory factors involved in the BMP-activated signaling cascades and similar results were also observed in osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs. However, LN freezing preserved better bioactivity of rhBMP-2 whereas dosage-dependent declination was observed in ECIR groups. In conclusion, considering BMP-2 activity, LN freezing-treated autografts may result in a better osteoinduction outcomes than those treated using ECIR. Further investigation of the factors involved in bone formation is required.

Autograft or Allograft? Irradiated or Not? A Contrast Between Autograft and Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes and adverse events associated with irradiated and nonirradiated allografts in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled trials from January 1990 to March 2018 to compare autograft with allograft in ACL reconstruction. Both objective and subjective outcomes of the function and adverse events were meta-analyzed. Two comparisons were summarized: (1) autograft and nonirradiated allograft and (2) autograft and irradiated allograft. The bias risk was based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The overall risk ratio or weighted mean difference was calculated using a fixed- or random-effects model. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated by the Q and the I2 statistics. RESULTS: Eleven trials were included in this review for meta-analysis. A total of 1,172 patients were involved (465 autograft and 461 nonirradiated allograft; 141 autograft and 138 irradiated allograft patients). The average follow-up varied from 2 to >10 years. The mean patient age varied from 22 to 32.8 years. The total failure rate was 2.5%. Our analyses demonstrated better clinical outcomes in autograft than irradiated allograft, which could be observed clearly through the International Knee Documentation Committee score (3.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.93-5.76; P < .0001; I2 = 0%), Lysholm score (2.94; 95% CI, 0.66-5.22; P = .01; I2 = 0%), and Tegner score (0.14; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.36; P = .22; I2 = 0%) with fewer adverse events 0.20 (95% CI, 0.11-0.39; P < .00001; I2 = 0%). There were no significant differences in autograft and nonirradiated allograft groups (P = .47, P = .27, P = .24, and P = .24, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Autograft offered greater advantages in functional outcomes and adverse events than irradiated allograft in ACL reconstruction; however, there were no significant differences between autograft and nonirradiated allograft in ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, meta-analysis of Level I and Level II studies.

Irradiated allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis and systematic review of prospective studies.

BACKGROUND: Irradiated allografts and autografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The outcomes between these two grafts are controversial. This meta-analysis and systematic review of prospective comparative studies was performed to compare the clinical outcomes, including knee functionality, stability, subjective evaluation, complications, and failure, of irradiated allografts and autografts in primary ACL reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to 12 August 2017 to identify prospective studies that compared irradiated allografts with autografts for primary ACL reconstruction. Randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Prospective cohort studies were included in the systematic reviews. Two reviewers independently assessed the study quality and extracted relevant data. Statistical heterogeneity among the trials was evaluated by the chi-square and I-square tests. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials and two prospective cohort studies involving 18,835 patients met the inclusion criteria. In the meta-analysis, significant differences were observed in knee stability and subjective evaluation with respect to the KT-2000 score (p < .0001), pivot shift test (p = .001), anterior drawer test (p = .0001), Lachman test (p = .0002), subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (p < .0001), Cincinnati knee score (p = .04), Lysholm score (p = .01), and Tegner score (p = .03). However, the differences in functional assessment in terms of the overall IKDC score (p = .21), range of motion (p = .94), Harner's vertical jump test (p = .09), Daniel's one-leg hop test (p = .50), and complication rate (p = .34) were not significant between the two groups. Failure was reported in two prospective cohort studies in 302 of 14,829 (2%) patients in the autograft group and 157 of 3941 (4%) patients in the irradiated allograft group. CONCLUSION: Irradiated allografts are inferior to autografts for patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with respect to knee stability and subjective evaluation. However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of function and complication. The robustness of the findings might need to be further validated because of the limited number of randomized controlled trials. More randomized controlled trials with longer follow-ups are required to further evaluate the failure rate in the two groups.

Microvascular transplants in head and neck reconstruction: 3D evaluation of volume loss.

BACKGROUND: Despite oversized latissimus dorsi free flap reconstruction in the head and neck area, esthetic and functional problems continue to exist due to the well-known occurrence of transplant shrinkage. The purpose of this study was to acquire an estimation of the volume and time of the shrinkage process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The assessment of volume loss was performed using a 3D evaluation of two postoperative CT scans. A retrospective review was conducted on all latissimus dorsi free flap reconstructions performed between 2004 and 2013. Inclusion criteria for the assessment were: resection of an oral carcinoma and microsurgical defect coverage with latissimus dorsi free flap; a first postoperative CT (CT1) performed between 3 weeks and a maximum of 3 months after reconstruction surgery; and an additional CT scan (CT2) performed at least one year postoperatively. The exclusion criterion was surgical intervention in the local area between the acquisition of CT1 and CT2. The effect of adjuvant radiation therapy was considered. Volume determination of the transplant was carried out in CT1 and CT2 by manual segmentation of the graft. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were recruited. 3D evaluation showed an average volume loss of 34.4%. In the consideration of postoperative radiotherapy the volume reduction was 39.2% in patients with radiotherapy and 31.3% in patients without radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: The reconstruction flap volume required for overcorrection of the surgical defect was investigated. This study indicates that a volume loss of more than 30% could be expected one or more years after latissimus dorsi free flap reconstruction. Clinical trial number DRKS00007534.

The use of extracorporeally irradiated autografts in pelvic reconstruction following tumour resection.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and oncological outcome of extracorporeally irradiated autografts used to reconstruct the pelvis after a P1/2 internal hemipelvectomy. The study included 18 patients with a primary malignant bone tumour of the pelvis. There were 13 males and five females with a mean age of 24.8 years (8 to 62). Of these, seven had an osteogenic sarcoma, six a Ewing's sarcoma, and five a chondrosarcoma. At a mean follow-up of 51.6 months (4 to 185), nine patients had died with metastatic disease while nine were free from disease. Local recurrence occurred in three patients all of whom eventually died of their disease. Deep infection occurred in three patients and required removal of their graft in two while the third underwent a hindquarter amputation for extensive flap necrosis. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score of the 16 patients who could be followed-up for at least 12 months was 77% (50 to 90). Those 15 patients who completed the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score questionnaire had a mean score of 71% (53 to 85). Extracorporeal irradiation and re-implantation of bone is a valid method of reconstruction after an internal hemipelvectomy. It has an acceptable morbidity and a functional outcome that compares favourably with other available reconstructive techniques.

Effect of LLLT on autogenous bone grafts in the repair of critical size defects in the calvaria of immunosuppressed rats.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the bone repair of critical size defects (CSDs) filled with autogenous bone in the calvaria of immunosuppressed rats. A 5 mm-diameter CSD was created in the calvaria of 30 rats. The animals were divided into 5 groups (n = 6): Control (C)--the defect was filled with a blood clot; Dexamethasone (D)--dexamethasone treatment, and the defect was filled with a blood clot; Autogenous bone (AB)--dexamethasone treatment, and the defect was filled with autogenous bone; LLLT--dexamethasone treatment, and the defect received LLLT (660 nm; 35 mW; 24.7 J/cm(2)); and AB + LLLT--dexamethasone treatment, and the defect was filled with autogenous bone and received LLLT. All animals were euthanized at 30 postoperative days. Histometric and histological analyses were performed. The new bone area (NBA) was calculated as the percentage of the total area of the original defect. Data were analysed statistically (an analysis of variance and Tukey's test; P < 0.05). The AB + LLLT group showed the largest NBA of all groups (P < 0.05). The use of LLLT with AB effectively stimulated bone formation in CSDs in the calvaria of immunosuppressed rats.

New bone formation around implants inserted on autologous and xenografts irradiated or not with IR laser light: a histomorphometric study in rabbits.

Use of biomaterials and light on bone grafts has been widely reported. This work assessed the influence of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on bone volume (BV) and bone implant contact (BIC) interface around implants inserted in blocks of bovine or autologous bone grafts (autografts), irradiated or not, in rabbit femurs. Twenty-four adult rabbits were divided in 8 groups: AG: autograft; XG: xenograft; AG/L: autograft + laser; XG/L: xenograft + laser; AG/I: autograft + titanium (Ti) implant; XG/I: xenograft + Ti implant; AG/I/L: autograft + Ti implant + laser; and XG/I/L: xenograft + Ti implant + laser. The animals received the Ti implant after incorporation of the grafts. The laser parameters in the groups AG/L and XG/L were λ=780 nm, 70 mW, CW, 21.5 J/cm 2 , while in the groups AG/I/L and XG/I/L the following parameters were used: λ=780 nm, 70 mW, 0.5 cm 2 (spot), 4 J/cm 2 per point (4), 16 J/cm 2 per session, 48 h interval × 12 sessions, CW, contact mode. LLLT was repeated every other day during 2 weeks. To avoid systemic effect, only one limb of each rabbit was double grafted. All animals were sacrificed 9 weeks after implantation. Specimens were routinely stained and histomorphometry carried out. Comparison of non-irradiated and irradiated grafts (AG/L versus AG and XG/L versus XG) showed that irradiation increased significantly BV on both grafts (p=0.05, p=0.001). Comparison between irradiated and non-irradiated grafts (AG/I/L versus AG/I and XG/I/L versus XG/I) showed a significant (p=0.02) increase of the BIC in autografts. The same was seen when xenografts were used, without significant difference. The results of this investigation suggest that the use of LLLT is effective for enhancing new bone formation with consequent increase of bone-implant interface in both autologous grafts and xenografts.

New Bone Formation around Implants Inserted on Autologous and Xenografts Irradiated or not with IR Laser Light: A Histomorphometric Study in Rabbits

Use of biomaterials and light on bone grafts has been widely reported. This work assessed the influence of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on bone volume (BV) and bone implant contact (BIC) interface around implants inserted in blocks of bovine or autologous bone grafts (autografts), irradiated or not, in rabbit femurs. Twenty-four adult rabbits were divided in 8 groups: AG: autograft; XG: xenograft; AG/L: autograft + laser; XG/L: xenograft + laser; AG/I: autograft + titanium (Ti) implant; XG/I: xenograft + Ti implant; AG/I/L: autograft + Ti implant + laser; and XG/I/L: xenograft + Ti implant + laser. The animals received the Ti implant after incorporation of the grafts. The laser parameters in the groups AG/L and XG/L were λ=780 nm, 70 mW, CW, 21.5 J/cm 2 , while in the groups AG/I/L and XG/I/L the following parameters were used: λ=780 nm, 70 mW, 0.5 cm 2 (spot), 4 J/cm 2 per point (4), 16 J/cm 2 per session, 48 h interval × 12 sessions, CW, contact mode. LLLT was repeated every other day during 2 weeks. To avoid systemic effect, only one limb of each rabbit was double grafted. All animals were sacrificed 9 weeks after implantation. Specimens were routinely stained and histomorphometry carried out. Comparison of non-irradiated and irradiated grafts (AG/L versus AG and XG/L versus XG) showed that irradiation increased significantly BV on both grafts (p=0.05, p=0.001). Comparison between irradiated and non-irradiated grafts (AG/I/L versus AG/I and XG/I/L versus XG/I) showed a significant (p=0.02) increase of the BIC in autografts. The same was seen when xenografts were used, without significant difference. The results of this investigation suggest that the use of LLLT is effective for enhancing new bone formation with consequent increase of bone-implant interface in both autologous grafts and xenografts.

O uso de biomateriais e luz em enxertos ósseos têm sido relatados. Esse trabalho avaliou a influência do laser baixa potência - LBP no volume ósseo (VO) e superfície de contato osso-implante (COI) ao redor de implantes dentários inseridos em blocos de enxerto bovino ou autólogos incorporados, irradiados ou não, em fêmures de coelho. Vinte e quatro coelhos adultos foram divididos em 8 grupos: EA: enxerto autólogo; EX: enxerto xenógeno; EA/L: enxerto autólogo + laser; EX/L: enxerto xenógeno + laser; EA/I: enxerto autólogo + implante; EX/I: enxerto xenógeno + implante; EA/I/L: enxerto autólogo + implante de titânio + laser; EX/I/L: enxerto xenógeno + implante de titânio + laser. Os animais receberam um implante de titânio após a incorporação dos enxertos. Os parâmetros de laser nos grupos EA/L e EX/L foram λ =780 nm, 70 mW, CW, 21,5 J/cm 2 ), enquanto que nos grupos EA/I/L e EX/I/L os seguintes parâmetros de laser foram utilizados: λ =780 nm, 70 mW, 0,5 cm 2 (spot), 4 J/cm 2 por ponto (4), 16 J/cm 2 por sessão, intervalo de 48 h × 12 sessões, CW, modo contato. O LBP foi repetido a cada 48 h (2 semanas). Para evitar efeito sistêmico apenas um membro de cada coelho foi duplamente enxertado. Todos os animais foram sacrificados 9 semanas após o implante. Os espécimes foram corados rotineiramente e histomorfometria foi realizada. A comparação dos enxertos não-irradiados e irradiados (EA/L versus EA e EX/L versus EX) mostrou que a irradiação aumentou significantemente (p=0,02) o VO para ambos os tipos de enxertos (p=0,05, p=0,001). A comparação dos enxertos não-irradiados e irradiados (EA/I/L versus EA/I e EX/I/L versus EX/I) mostrou um aumento significante (p=0,02) do COI nos enxertos autólogos e xenógenos sem diferença estatística. Os resultados desta investigação sugerem que o uso de LBP é efetivo para aumentar a neoformação óssea com consequente aumento do COI em enxertos autólogos e xenógenos.

Neural regeneration in a novel nerve conduit across a large gap of the transected sciatic nerve in rats with low-level laser phototherapy.

This study proposes a biodegradable nerve conduit comprising 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) cross-linked gelatin annexed with ß-tricalcium phosphate (ß-TCP) ceramic particles (EDC-gelatin-TCP, EGT). For this study, the EGT-implant site in rats was irradiated using 660-nm GaAlAsP laser diodes (50 mW) for trigger point therapy to investigate the use of low-level laser (LLL) stimulation in the regeneration of a 15-mm transected sciatic nerve. Animals were divided into three groups: a control group undergoing autologous nerve graft (autograft); a sham-irradiated group (EGT), and an experimental group undergoing laser stimulation (EGT/LS). Two trigger points on the surgical incision along the sciatic nerve were irradiated transcutaneously for 2 min daily for 10 consecutive days. Twelve weeks after implantation, walking track analysis showed a significantly higher sciatic functional index (SFI; p < 0.05) and improved toe spreading development in the autograft and EGT/LS groups, compared to the EGT group. In the electrophysiological measurement, the mean recovery index (peak amplitude and area) of the compound muscle action potential curves in the autograft and EGT/LS groups showed significantly improved functional recovery than in the EGT group (p < 0.05). Compared with the EGT group, the autograft and EGT/LS groups showed a reduction in muscular atrophy. Histomorphometric assessments showed that the EGT/LS group had undergone more rapid nerve regeneration than the EGT group. Therefore, motor function, electrophysiological reaction, muscular reinnervation, and histomorphometric assessments demonstrate that LLL therapy can accelerate the repair of a 15-mm transected peripheral nerve in rats after being bridged with the EGT nerve conduit.