[Problems and thoughts in clinical safety evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine].

Amid the modernization and internationalization of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), the safety of TCM has attracted much attention. At the moment, the government, scientific research teams, and pharmaceutical enterprises have made great efforts to explore methods and techniques for clinical safety evaluation of TCM. Although considerable achievements have been made, there are still many problems, such as the non-standard terms of adverse reactions of TCM, unclear evaluation indicators, unreasonable judgment methods, lack of evaluation models, out-of-date evaluation standards, and unsound reporting systems. Therefore, it is urgent to further deepen the research mode and method of clinical safety evaluation of TCM. Based on the current national requirements for the life-cycle management of drugs, this study focused on the problems in the five dimensions of clinical safety evaluation of TCM, including normative terms, evaluation modes, judgment methods, evaluation standards, and reporting systems, and proposed suggestions on the development of a life-cycle clinical safety evaluation method that conformed to the characteristics of TCM, hoping to provide a reference for future research.

Evaluating the performance of drug-repurposing technologies.

Drug-repurposing technologies are growing in number and maturing. However, comparisons to each other and to reality are hindered because of a lack of consensus with respect to performance evaluation. Such comparability is necessary to determine scientific merit and to ensure that only meaningful predictions from repurposing technologies carry through to further validation and eventual patient use. Here, we review and compare performance evaluation measures for these technologies using version 2 of our shotgun repurposing Computational Analysis of Novel Drug Opportunities (CANDO) platform to illustrate their benefits, drawbacks, and limitations. Understanding and using different performance evaluation metrics ensures robust cross-platform comparability, enabling us to continue to strive toward optimal repurposing by decreasing the time and cost of drug discovery and development.

Evidence-Based Guidelines for Drug Interaction Studies: Model-Informed Time Course of Intestinal and Hepatic CYP3A4 Inhibition by Clarithromycin.

Drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies are mandated in drug development; however, protocols for evaluating the impact of cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibition on new molecular entities are currently inconsistent. This study utilised validated physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) software to define the optimal dose, frequency, and duration of clarithromycin to achieve optimal characterisation of CYP3A4 inhibition in a study population. The Simcyp® Simulator (Version 19.0) was used to simulate clarithromycin-mediated CYP3A4 inhibition in healthy virtual cohorts. Between trial variability in magnitude and time course of CYP3A4 activity was assessed following clarithromycin dosing strategies obtained from the University of Washington Drug Interaction Database. Heterogeneity in CYP3A4 inhibition was evaluated across sex, race, and age. Literature review identified 500 mg twice daily for 5 days as the most common clarithromycin dosing protocol for CYP3A4 inhibition studies. On simulation, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily resulted in the largest steady-state inhibition of hepatic (percent mean inhibition [95%CI] = 80 [77-83]) and small intestine (94 [94-95]) CYP3A4 activity (as compared to 500 mg once daily, 400 mg once/twice daily, or 250 mg once/twice daily). Additionally, 500 mg twice daily was associated with the shortest time for 90% of individuals to reach 90% of their minimum hepatic (4 days) and small intestine (1 days) CYP3A4 activity. The study presented herein supports that clarithromycin dosing protocol of 500 mg twice daily for 5 days is sufficient to achieve maximal hepatic and small intestine CYP3A4 inhibition. These findings were consistent between sex, race, and age differences.

Flexibility in Drug Product Development: A Perspective.

The process of bringing a drug to market involves innumerable decisions to refine a concept into a final product. The final product goes through extensive research and development to meet the target product profile and to obtain a product that is manufacturable at scale. Historically, this process often feels inflexible and linear, as ideas and development paths are eliminated early on to allow focus on the workstream with the highest probability of success. Carrying multiple options early in development is both time-consuming and resource-intensive. Similarly, changing development pathways after significant investment carries a high "penalty of change" (PoC), which makes pivoting to a new concept late in development inhibitory. Can drug product (DP) development be made more flexible? The authors believe that combining a nonlinear DP development approach, leveraging state-of-the art data sciences, and using emerging process and measurement technologies will offer enhanced flexibility and should become the new normal. Through the use of iterative DP evaluation, "smart" clinical studies, artificial intelligence, novel characterization techniques, automation, and data collection/modeling/interpretation, it should be possible to significantly reduce the PoC during development. In this Perspective, a review of ideas/techniques along with supporting technologies that can be applied at each stage of DP development is shared. It is further discussed how these contribute to an improved and flexible DP development through the acceleration of the iterative build-measure-learn cycle in laboratories and clinical trials.

COVID-19 Vaccines: Current Understanding on Immunogenicity, Safety, and Further Considerations.

The world has entered the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and its intensity is significantly higher than that of the first wave of early 2020. Many countries or regions have been forced to start the second round of lockdowns. To respond rapidly to this global pandemic, dozens of COVID-19 vaccine candidates have been developed and many are undergoing clinical testing. Evaluating and defining effective vaccine candidates for human use is crucial for prioritizing vaccination programs against COVID-19. In this review, we have summarized and analyzed the efficacy, immunogenicity and safety data from clinical reports on different COVID-19 vaccines. We discuss the various guidelines laid out for the development of vaccines and the importance of biological standards for comparing the performance of vaccines. Lastly, we highlight the key remaining challenges, possible strategies for addressing them and the expected improvements in the next generation of COVID-19 vaccines.

Evaluación positiva de medicamentos: enero, febrero y marzo de 2020 / Positive assessment of drugs: January, February, March 2020

Se reseñan los medicamentos evaluados y con dictamen positivo por comisión de expertos de la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios o de la Agencia Europea del Medicamento hechos públicos en abril y junio de 2020, y considerados de mayor interés para el profesional sanitario. Se trata de opiniones técnicas positivas que son previas a la autorización y puesta en el mercado del medicamento

The drugs assessed by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products or European Medicines Agency made public in April and June of 2020, and considered of interest to the healthcare professional, are reviewed. These are positive technical reports prior to the authorization and placing on the market of the product

Evaluación positiva de medicamentos: abril, mayo y junio 2020 / Positive assessment of drugs: April, May and June 2020

Se reseñan los medicamentos evaluados y con dictamen positivo por comisión de expertos de la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios o de la Agencia Europea del Medicamento hechos públicos en abril, mayo y junio de 2020, y considerados de mayor interés para el profesional sanitario. Se trata de opiniones técnicas positivas que son previas a la autorización y puesta en el mercado del medicamento

The drugs assessed by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products or European Medicines Agency made public in April, May and June 2020, and considered of interest to the healthcare professional, are reviewed. These are positive technical reports prior to the authorization and placing on the market of the product

Generic selection criteria for safety and patient benefit [IX]: Evaluation of "feeling of use" of sodium hyaluronate eye drops using the Haptic Skill Logger (HapLog®) wearable sensor for evaluating haptic behaviors.

We compared the pharmaceutical properties, such as surface tension, drop volume, nozzle inner diameter, and force to push the drug product out of the container (squeeze force), of purified sodium hyaluronate eye drops preparations of one brand-name (Hyalein) and 11 generic drugs used for treatment of keratoconjunctiva epithelial disorders, and examined product selection based on the needs of the patient. The surface tension of Nissin (51.0 dyn/cm) and Nitten (52.3 dyn/cm) was significantly lower than that of Hyalein (62.8 dyn/cm), whereas Nitten PF (69.5 dyn/cm) was significantly higher than Hyalein. The drop volume of Tearbalance (42.4 mg), Nissin (43.7 mg), and Nitten (42.7 mg) was significantly lower than that of Hyalein (50.4 mg). We compared the squeeze force using a wearable touch sensor (Haptic Skill Logger: HapLog®) and digital force gauge (DF). The squeeze force of HapLog® showed values of about 1.7- to 3.5-fold higher than that of DF. Moreover, the squeeze force of Eyecare (34.0 N), Kyorin (35.4 N), and Nitten PF (44.3 N) by HapLog® was significantly higher than that of Hyalein (10.5 N). In contrast, the squeeze force of Kyorin (20.8 N) and Nitten PF (25.0 N) by DF was significantly higher than that of Hyalein (12.2 N). Two questionnaire surveys on the feeling of instillation of eye drops revealed a strong negative correlation between feeling of use and squeeze force.

WHO implementation workshop on guidelines on procedures and data requirements for changes to approved biotherapeutic products, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 25-26 June 2019.

The first global workshop on implementation of the WHO guidelines on procedures and data requirements for changes to approved biotherapeutic products adopted by the WHO Expert Committee in 2018 was held in June 2019. The workshop participants recognized that the principles based on sound science and the potential for risk, as described in the WHO Guidelines on post-approval changes, which constitute the global standard for product life-cycle management are providing clarity and helping national regulatory authorities in establishing guidance while improving time-lines for an efficient regulation of products. Consequently, the regulatory situation for post-approval changes and guideline implementation is changing but there is a disparity between different countries. While the guidelines are gradually being implemented in some countries and also being considered in other countries, the need for regional workshops and further training on post-approval changes was a common theme reiterated by many participants. Given the complexities relating to post-approval changes in different regions/countries, there was a clear understanding among all participants that an efficient approach for product life-cycle management at a national level is needed to ensure faster availability of high standard, safe and efficacious medicines to patients as per the World Health Assembly Resolution 67.21.

'Becoming-with' a repeat healthy volunteer: Managing and negotiating trust among repeat healthy volunteers in commercial clinical drug trials.

Recent sociological research has raised important sociological and ethical questions about the role of financial rewards in terms of healthy volunteer involvement in clinical trials. Research suggests that it would be parochial to assume financial rewards alone are sufficient to explain repeat healthy volunteering. This paper explores other factors that might explain repeat healthy volunteering behaviours in phase I clinical drug trials. Drawing on qualitative research with healthy volunteers, the paper argues that while healthy volunteers make rational decisions to take part in drug trials, understanding how they become repeat volunteers requires considering varied relationships and networks involved. Drawing on Deleuze's concept of 'event' and 'becoming-with', the paper illustrates the relational, processual and embodied nature of trust in repeat healthy volunteer involvement in clinical drug trials. The paper concludes that repeat healthy volunteering is a constant flux of negotiating trust and mistrust. The paper contributes to sociological debates about trust and public engagement with technological innovations to illustrate trust among healthy volunteers as processual and changeable.

OECD approaches and considerations for regulatory evaluation of endocrine disruptors.

Identifying the potential endocrine disruptor hazard of environmental chemicals is a regulatory mandate for many countries. However, due to the adaptive nature of the endocrine system, absence of a single method capable of identifying endocrine disruption, and the latency between exposure to endocrine disrupting chemical during sensitive life stages and the manifestation of adverse responses, satisfying the regulatory requirement needed to identify a chemical as an endocrine disruptor is a challenge. There are now a variety of validated regulatory tests that can be used in combination to provide evidence that a chemical affects the oestrogen, androgen, thyroid, and steroidogenic pathways of vertebrates, but most rely (at least to some extent) on animal testing and require considerable cost and time to produce the necessary data. Emerging research methods are able to evaluate other endocrine pathways, incorporate more sensitive endpoints, and combine multiple alternative methods to predict in vivo outcomes. Some research approaches may also bridge gaps that have been identified in current endocrine regulatory testing. For the near term, considering new endpoints in a regulatory context may require adding them to existing test methods in order to establish relationships between the traditional and the innovative. From the outset, endocrine testing has always required integration of multiple methods that provide data on different levels of biological organisation, thus, the area of endocrine disruption is particularly adaptable to adverse outcome pathway (AOP) frameworks and integrated test methods built around AOPs. Herein, we provide a review of the status of endocrine disruptors in the OECD context, examples where innovation from research is needed to improve or bridge gaps in endocrine testing, and suggestions for regulators and researchers to facilitate uptake of innovate methods for endocrine disruptor regulatory testing. The increase in several human complex human disorders that include an endocrine component and the alarming decrease in wildlife biodiversity are commanding directives to include the best, most informative, innovative approaches to accelerate the rate and throughput of chemical evaluation for endocrine disruption.

Evaluación positiva de medicamentos: marzo, abril y mayo 2019 / Possitive assesment of drugs: March, April and May 2019

Se reseñan los medicamentos evaluados y con dictamen positivo por comisión de expertos de la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios o de la Agencia Europea del Medicamento publicados en marzo y abril de 2018, considerados de mayor interés para el profesional sanitario. Se trata de opiniones técnicas positivas que son previas a la autorización y puesta en el mercado del medicamento

The drugs assessed by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products or European Medicines Agency made public in March, April and May of 2018, and considered of interest to the healthcare professional, are reviewed. These are positive technical reports prior to the authorization and placing on the market of the product

Long-Term Engineered Cultures of Primary Mouse Hepatocytes for Strain and Species Comparison Studies During Drug Development.

Testing drugs in isogenic rodent strains to satisfy regulatory requirements is insufficient for derisking organ toxicity in genetically diverse human populations; in contrast, advances in mouse genetics can help mitigate these limitations. Compared to the expensive and slower in vivo testing, in vitro cultures enable the testing of large compound libraries toward prioritizing lead compounds and selecting an animal model with human-like response to a compound. In the case of the liver, a leading cause of drug attrition, isolated primary mouse hepatocytes (PMHs) rapidly decline in function within current culture platforms, which restricts their use for assessing the effects of longer-term compound exposure. Here we addressed this challenge by fabricating mouse micropatterned cocultures (mMPCC) containing PMHs and 3T3-J2 murine embryonic fibroblasts that displayed 4 weeks of functions; mMPCCs created from either C57Bl/6J or CD-1 PMHs outperformed collagen/Matrigel™ sandwich-cultured hepatocyte monocultures by ∼143-fold, 413-fold, and 10-fold for albumin secretion, urea synthesis, and cytochrome P450 activities, respectively. Such functional longevity of mMPCCs enabled in vivo relevant comparisons across strains for CYP induction and hepatotoxicity following exposure to 14 compounds with subsequent comparison to responses in primary human hepatocytes (PHHs). In conclusion, mMPCCs display high levels of major liver functions for several weeks and can be used to assess strain- and species-specific compound effects when used in conjunction with responses in PHHs. Ultimately, mMPCCs can be used to leverage the power of mouse genetics for characterizing subpopulations sensitive to compounds, characterizing the degree of interindividual variability, and elucidating genetic determinants of severe hepatotoxicity in humans.

Evaluación positiva de medicamentos: septiembre, octubre y noviembre 2018 / Possitive assesment of drugs: September, October and November 2018

Se reseñan los medicamentos evaluados y con dictamen positivo por la comisión de expertos de la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios o de la Agencia Europea del Medicamento hechos públicos en septiembre, octubre y noviembre de 2018. Se trata de opiniones técnicas positivas previas a la autorización y puesta en el mercado del medicamento

The drugs assessed by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products or European Medicines Agency made public in September, October and November of 2018, and considered of interest to the healthcare profesional, are reviewed. These are positive technical reports prior to the authorization and placing on the market of the product

Did we see it Coming? An Evaluation of the Swedish Early Awareness and Alert System.

BACKGROUND: Early awareness and alert systems have been established in many countries but evidence on their ability to accurately prioritize new medicines (for early assessment) is limited. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the Swedish Early Awareness and Alert System identified and prioritized (i.e., produced early assessment reports for) new medicines that would go on to have substantial economic impact. METHODS: We adapted a study design commonly used in the assessment of diagnostic test accuracy. The prioritization made by the Swedish Early Awareness and Alert System prior to marketing authorization comprised the index test and the national drug sales data in the second year post-authorization served as the reference standard. All initial marketing authorization applications for medicinal products processed by the European Medicines Agency between 2010 and 2015 (study population) were classified using the index test and the reference standard. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-three new medicinal products processed by the European Medicines Agency comprised the study population. Of these, 71 were prioritized by the Swedish Early Awareness and Alert System and 21 were classified as having substantial economic impact. The sensitivity and positive predictive value were 76.2% and 22.5%, respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the accuracy of prioritization, in terms of sensitivity, was 100% for antineoplastic/immunomodulating agents. CONCLUSIONS: The Swedish Early Awareness and Alert System identified all new medicines that would go on to have substantial economic impact and prioritized most of these medicines. Our findings provide reassurance to decision makers who rely on the outputs of the Swedish Early Awareness and Alert System to keep informed about new medicines. Moreover, this study also provides valuable insights to stakeholders willing to establish or evaluate their own early awareness and alert activities and systems.

Evaluación positiva de medicamentos: mayo, junio y julio 2018 / Positive assessment of drugs: May, June and July 2018

Se reseñan los medicamentos evaluados y con dictamen positivo por comisión de expertos de la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios o de la Agencia Europea del Medicamento hechos públicos en mayo, junio y julio de 2018, y considerados de mayor interés para el profesional sanitario. Se trata de opiniones técnicas positivas que son previas a la autorización y puesta en el mercado del medicamento

The drugs assessed by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products or European Medicines Agency made public in May, June and July of 2018, and considered of interest to the healthcare professional, are reviewed here. These are positive technical reports prior to the authorization and placing on the market of the product