Discrepancies between upper GI symptoms described by those who have them and their identification by conventional medical terminology: a survey of sufferers in four countries.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a self-administered questionnaire for upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms using lay vocabulary uninfluenced by established medical terminology or concepts and to conduct a survey of symptom occurrence among sufferers in four countries. METHODS: The questionnaire was designed by integrating information gained from the vocabulary used by 38 upper GI symptom sufferers. There was no medical input to its development. The questionnaire was then used, after appropriate translation, in Brazil, Russia, the UK and the USA. Details of 10 659 symptom episodes were obtained from 2665 individuals. RESULTS: Nine symptoms described in lay vocabulary were identified during questionnaire development. Of these, one corresponded to regurgitation, whereas two that were distinguished by survey participants might both be interpreted as heartburn. One chest symptom for which a corresponding medical term was uncertain occurred in ∼30% of the respondents. Five different 'stomach' or abdominal symptoms were identified. The predominant symptom and the pattern of concurrent symptoms often varied from one symptom episode to another. Use of the terms 'heartburn', 'reflux', 'indigestion' and 'burning stomach' to describe symptoms varied between countries. CONCLUSION: Some common upper GI symptoms described by those who suffer them have no clear counterpart in conventional medical terminology. Inadequacy of the conventional terminology in this respect deserves attention, first, to characterize it fully, and thereafter to construct enquiry that delivers more precise symptom identification. Our results suggest that improvement may require the use of vocabulary of individuals suffering the symptoms without imposing conformity with established symptom concepts.

Overlap of functional heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux disease with irritable bowel syndrome.

Several studies indicate a significant degree of overlap between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Likewise, both functional heartburn (FH) and IBS are functional digestive disorders that may occur in the same patients. However, data establishing a solid link between FH and IBS are lacking, mainly because the clinical definition of FH has undergone substantial changes over the years. The available literature on the overlap between GERD or FH and IBS highlights considerable heterogeneity in terms of the criteria and diagnostic procedures used to assess heartburn and IBS. In particular, several epidemiological studies included patients with concomitant IBS and GERD without any attempt to distinguish FH (as defined by the Rome III criteria) from GERD via pathophysiological investigations. Independent of these critical issues, there is preliminary evidence supporting a significant degree of FH-IBS overlap. This underscores the need for studies based on updated diagnostic criteria and accurate pathophysiological classifications, particularly to distinguish FH from GERD. This distinction would represent an essential starting point to achieving a better understanding of pathophysiology in the subclasses of patients with GERD and FH and properly assessing the different degrees of overlap between IBS and the subcategories of heartburn.The present review article intends to appraise and critically discuss current evidence supporting a possible concomitance of GERD or FH with IBS in the same patients and to highlight the pathophysiological relationships between these disorders.

Functional heartburn: clinical characteristics and outcome.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with heartburn and normal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, normal oesophageal acid exposure, no symptom-reflux association and who fail to respond to a proton-pump inhibitor are classified as having functional heartburn (FH). This study aimed (i) to characterize the symptoms and functional abnormalities of patients with FH and (ii) to describe their clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among all patients referred for 24 h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH), patients with FH were identified. The clinical characteristics and high-resolution oesophageal pressure topography recordings of FH patients were analyzed at the time of the 24-h MII-pH test. A symptom-related and health-related quality-of-life questionnaire was then sent to FH patients to assess the long-term outcome. RESULTS: Forty patients fulfilled the criteria for FH, representing 8.5% of the referred population. Twenty-two months after initial testing, 66% of patients still suffered from heartburn. The rate of mixed reflux (liquid/gas) was higher in patients with persisting heartburn at the final evaluation (63 vs. 50%, P=0.04). Sixty-six per cent of patients had one or more manometric abnormalities. Acid clearance time in MII-pH was significantly higher in patients with weak peristalsis than patients with normal peristalsis (60 ± 45 vs. 31 ± 19 s, P=0.03). A high rate of mixed reflux and/or a manometric abnormality were associated with a higher risk of persistent heartburn. CONCLUSION: FH is a chronic disorder with persisting symptoms in two-thirds of patients. An increased rate of mixed reflux and/or the presence of manometric abnormalities are associated with a higher risk of persisting symptoms and may help to identify the population with unmet therapeutic needs.

Demographic, clinical, and psychological characteristics of the heartburn groups classified using the Rome III criteria and factors associated with the responsiveness to proton pump inhibitors in the gastroesophageal reflux disease group.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The diagnostic criteria for nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and functional heartburn (FH) have been changed. We investigated demographic, clinical, and psychological characteristics of the heartburn groups classified using the Rome III criteria and factors associated with the responsiveness to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) group. METHODS: Ninety-five patients with heartburn underwent endoscopy, 24-hour esophageal pH-metry and then a PPI test. NERD was diagnosed when % time with pH <4 was >4%, a symptom index (SI) >or=50% or a positive PPI test in patients without erosive esophagitis. Patients without such findings were classified as FH. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients had erosive reflux disease (ERD), 36 had NERD, and 23 had FH. The proportion of males was significantly higher in ERD than in FH. Atypical symptoms and IBS were more prevalent in FH than in ERD. Anxiety was more prevalent in FH than in NERD. The prevalence of pathologic acid reflux, a positive SI and a positive PPI test was similar between ERD and NERD patients. In the ERD and NERD groups, depression was independently associated with nonresponsiveness to PPIs. CONCLUSIONS: FH is a different entity from ERD or NERD, particularly in terms of gender, acid reflux patterns, psychological profiles, and the responsiveness to PPIs.

Non-erosive reflux disease, functional heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux disease; insights into pathophysiology and clinical presentation.

Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) has emerged as a real entity in the spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and may, indeed, represent the most common manifestation of reflux disease. Recent information indicates NERD can be further subclassified based on the results of pH studies and suggests that functional heartburn needs to be differentiated as that subgroup of patients in which there appears to be no relationship between symptoms, however 'typical' of GERD, and acid exposure. Other aspects of NERD need to be appreciated, including overlap with functional dyspepsia and the potential variations in response to such therapeutic interventions as acid-suppressive therapy and fundoplication. It seems quite possible that our failure to separate functional heartburn from NERD, in general, has contributed, in large measure, to diagnostic difficulties and therapeutic disappointment in GERD. An appreciation of the range of entities, of different etiology and pathology, within NERD will foster the development of effective approaches to the assessment and therapy of this challenging disorder.

Heartburn in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Germany and Sweden: a study on patients' burden of disease.

BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is widespread in the general population and presents in most cases with heartburn as the main symptom. The severity of symptoms is not necessarily related to erosive damage to the oesophagus due to acid reflux, but the frequency and severity of symptoms have an impact on the health-related QOL (HR-QOL) of the patient. OBJECTIVE: To characterise patients with GORD who consult a physician because of heartburn with respect to medical background and burden of disease in Germany and Sweden. METHODS: A total of 1011 patients who had been experiencing symptoms of GORD, including heartburn, for at least 1 year were recruited by physicians, who collected data on the patients' previous diagnosis and treatment. The patients themselves were interviewed by telephone about their heartburn. The EuroQOL 5-dimensional HR-QOL questionnaire (EQ-5D) and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) were used to measure patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: About half of the patients had been experiencing symptoms of GORD for >5 years. The majority (54%) perceived the severity of their heartburn as moderate. Thirty-eight percent of the patients had been examined by endoscopy during the last 12 months and 79% of these had macroscopic oesophagitis. Medical treatment for heartburn had been prescribed to 88% of the patients. The mean annual number of days with heartburn was assessed as 170 days per patient, with the majority of patients (64%) experiencing heartburn every week. HR-QOL was reduced in these patients as expressed by EQ-5D scores compared to scores for a general population. Patients with GORD had problems related to gastrointestinal symptoms as rated by GSRS scores. More severe heartburn was associated with a greater number of symptom days and reduced HR-QOL scores, whereas a relationship between the findings at endoscopy and the severity of symptoms or HR-QOL could not be found. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that heartburn confers a significant burden on patients with GORD, related to the frequency and severity of symptoms and reflected in the reduction in HR-QOL as perceived by the patients.

Synergy between low-dose ranitidine and antacid in decreasing gastric and oesophageal acidity and relieving meal-induced heartburn.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of recurrent postprandial heartburn and the basis for the effectiveness of antacids or low doses of histamine H2-receptor antagonists have not been well studied. METHODS: The selected subjects (n=26) had heartburn more than four times a week for at least 2 months, which was responsive to antacids. Gastric pH and oesophageal pH were measured for 1 h before, during, and 4.5 h after ingestion of a meal over 0.5 h. Heartburn severity was assessed at 15-min intervals beginning at the end of the meal. Each subject randomly received placebo, 75 mg ranitidine, 420 mg calcium carbonate, and ranitidine plus calcium carbonate. Values for pH were converted to acid concentration (mM) and integrated acidity was calculated from the cumulative, time-weighted means of the acid concentrations for every second of the postprandial recording period. RESULTS: There was a close temporal relationship between heartburn and oesophageal acidity. Most oesophageal acid exposure occurred over a 90-min period that began approximately 45 min after the end of the meal. During this period the gastric acid concentration was less than 5% of maximal. Ranitidine significantly decreased gastric but not oesophageal acidity, whilst antacid significantly decreased oesophageal but not gastric acidity. Ranitidine plus antacid significantly decreased both gastric and oesophageal acidity. Antacid alone and ranitidine plus antacid significantly decreased heartburn severity. CONCLUSIONS: Determining integrated gastric and oesophageal acidity provides novel information regarding the pathophysiology of meal-induced heartburn as well as the actions of low-dose ranitidine and antacid. For subjects with meal-induced heartburn, treatment with low-dose ranitidine plus antacid is particularly effective in decreasing gastric and oesophageal acidity as well as heartburn severity.

Young patients with Barrett's oesophagus experience less reflux complaints.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Barrett's oesophagus can be expected to be more resistant to the effects of acidic refluxate, and, hence, it can be postulated that patients with Barrett's oesophagus experience less reflux complaints. A cross-sectional study in consecutive patients presenting with Barrett's oesophagus and reflux oesophagitis was done in order to test this hypothesis. METHODS: Patients received a standardized questionnaire, and overall and specific symptom scores were assessed on a five-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Reflux oesophagitis was diagnosed in 128 patients and Barrett's oesophagus in 42. Patients with reflux oesophagitis had statistically significantly higher symptom scores than patients with Barrett's oesophagus (mean +/- SD): 9.1 +/- 6.3 vs. 6.2 +/- 5.4 (p = 0.01). The scores for heartburn and acid regurgitation were significantly higher in reflux oesophagitis, while there was a trend for epigastric pain, retrosternal pain, and vomitus. The symptom scores of patients with Barrett's oesophagus older than 60 years were not different from patients with reflux oesophagitis older than 60 years: 5.2 +/- 4.8 vs. 7.4 +/- 6.4. However, the symptom scores of patients younger than 60 years were significantly higher in those with reflux oesophagitis: 10.2 +/- 5.7 vs. 7.2 +/- 5.7 (p = 0.04). Odynophagia, heartburn, and acid regurgitation scored significantly higher in patients with reflux oesophagitis younger than 60 years as compared with Barrett patients younger than 60 years. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Barrett's oesophagus indeed suffer less from reflux complaints. However, this is only true for those younger than 60 years.

Clinical effectiveness and quality of life with ranitidine vs placebo in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients: a clinical experience network (CEN) study.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), often characterized as heartburn, is a highly common presenting complaint to family physicians. This study is the first large, prospective, nationwide family practice outpatient evaluation of the effectiveness of the histamine (H2)-receptor antagonist ranitidine as medical therapy for this disorder. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, 6-week study was designed to evaluate the effect of ranitidine on clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with GERD. Eligible patients included those who were at least 18 years old and had at least a 3-month history of heartburn or heartburn therapy and a minimum of 4 days with at least one heart-burn episode in the week preceding the baseline visit. Quality-of-life effects were measured using a general health status instrument and a previously validated heartburn-specific questionnaire. RESULTS: Ranitidine treatment conferred clinically and statistically significant reductions in mean heartburn pain scores within the first 24 hours (P < or = .001) and mean number of heartburn episodes within the first 48 hours (P < or = .001). These reductions were maintained throughout the 6-week trial, during both daytime and nighttime. Compared with patients receiving placebo, patients treated with ranitidine also used significantly fewer doses of antacids (P < or = .003). Further, both ranitidine-treated patients' and their physicians' global assessments of decreases in heartburn severity, as well as clinical improvement on ranitidine, proved superior to those of controls (P < or = .001). The rate of adverse events associated with ranitidine and placebo was low and similar. Ranitidine-treated patients had more favorable scores on the general health status dimensions of physical functioning, bodily pain, and vitality (P < .05), and more favorable scores on all dimensions of the heartburn-specific questionnaire (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Twice-daily treatment with ranitidine 150 mg is a valuable therapy for GERD in a typical family practice setting. It reduces the frequency and severity of symptoms within the first 24 to 48 hours of treatment and diminishes the use of nonprescription antacids while improving the quality of life as measured by both a general health status instrument and a disease-specific instrument.