RESUMO
The Forensic Databases Advisory Board (FDAB), an independent board that assists the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG), has presented a First Report on ethical aspects of the following Forensic Genetic Frequency Databases (FGFD): EMPOP, STRidER and YHRD. The FDAB designed an ethical framework to evaluate the content of these FGFD, and the factors to be considered for retention and acceptance of submissions. The FDAB framework proposes to categorize submissions according to the risk of having contravened the universal ethical principles outlined by international organizations, and the guidelines adopted by the ISFG. The report has been open to discussion by the scientific community since 2023. Herein we present the conception and development of the First Report along with a summary of its content, with consideration of the feedback received.
Assuntos
Genética Forense , Humanos , Genética Forense/ética , Frequência do Gene , Bases de Dados Genéticas , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/ética , Impressões Digitais de DNA/éticaAssuntos
Atitude , Confidencialidade , Espermatozoides , Doadores de Tecidos/psicologia , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/ética , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Triagem e Testes Direto ao Consumidor/ética , Triagem e Testes Direto ao Consumidor/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Masculino , Motivação , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Doadores de Tecidos/legislação & jurisprudência , Doadores de Tecidos/estatística & dados numéricos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/ética , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados UnidosRESUMO
This article examines the moralistic language and arguments used in relation to genetics. The focus is on three practices: (1) the claims that there is a duty to know about one's own genetic makeup, (2) assertions that genetic information should be used to inform reproductive decisions, and (3) the proposition that there are moral reasons to participate in biobank research. With these three, the author contends that there are equally good, if not better, arguments to challenge them from a Millian perspective. Furthermore, especially in the current political climate, there is a need to respect people's privacy concerns.
Assuntos
Saúde , Genética Humana , Princípios Morais , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/ética , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Privacidade , ReproduçãoRESUMO
On April 24, 2018, a suspect in California's notorious Golden State Killer cases was arrested after decades of eluding the police. Using a novel forensic approach, investigators identified the suspect by first identifying his relatives using a free, online genetic database populated by individuals researching their family trees. In the wake of the case, media outlets reported privacy concerns with police access to personal genetic data generated by or shared with genealogy services. Recent data from 1,587 survey respondents, however, provide preliminary reason to question whether such concerns have been overstated. Still, limitations on police access to genetic genealogy databases in particular may be desirable for reasons other than current public demand for them.
Assuntos
Criminosos , Genética Forense/métodos , Genealogia e Heráldica , Polícia , Adolescente , Adulto , California , Criminosos/legislação & jurisprudência , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/ética , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Genética Forense/ética , Genética Forense/legislação & jurisprudência , Privacidade Genética/ética , Privacidade Genética/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Masculino , Linhagem , Polícia/ética , Polícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/ética , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Genética Forense/ética , Genética Forense/legislação & jurisprudência , Acesso à Informação/ética , Acesso à Informação/legislação & jurisprudência , Big Data , Comércio/ética , Segurança Computacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Impressões Digitais de DNA , Mineração de Dados/ética , Mineração de Dados/legislação & jurisprudência , Privacidade Genética/ética , Privacidade Genética/legislação & jurisprudência , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Disseminação de Informação/legislação & jurisprudência , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Cooperação Internacional , FenótipoRESUMO
This review describes the social and ethical responses to the history of innovations in forensic genetics and their application to criminal investigations. Following an outline of the three recurrent social perspectives that have informed these responses (crime management, due process, and genetic surveillance), it goes on to introduce the repertoire of ethical considerations by describing a series of key reports that have shaped subsequent commentaries on forensic DNA profiling and databasing. Four major ethical concerns form the focus of the remainder of the paper (dignity, privacy, justice, and social solidarity), and key features of forensic genetic practice are examined in the light of these concerns. The paper concludes with a discussion of the concept of "proportionality" as a resource for balancing the social and ethical risks and benefits of the use of forensic genetics in support of criminal justice.
Assuntos
Genética Forense/ética , Genética Forense/legislação & jurisprudência , Impressões Digitais de DNA/ética , Impressões Digitais de DNA/legislação & jurisprudência , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/ética , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Privacidade Genética/ética , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/ética , Direitos Humanos/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Autonomia PessoalRESUMO
Public variant databases support the curation, clinical interpretation, and sharing of genomic data, thus reducing harmful errors or delays in diagnosis. As variant databases are increasingly relied on in the clinical context, there is concern that negligent variant interpretation will harm patients and attract liability. This article explores the evolving legal duties of laboratories, public variant databases, and physicians in clinical genomics and recommends a governance framework for databases to promote responsible data sharing.Genet Med advance online publication 15 December 2016.
Assuntos
Bases de Dados Genéticas/ética , Bases de Dados Genéticas/legislação & jurisprudência , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/ética , Curadoria de Dados/normas , Bases de Dados Genéticas/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/tendências , Variação Genética , Genômica/ética , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Disseminação de Informação/ética , Disseminação de Informação/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
During the last decade, DNA profiling and the use of DNA databases have become two of the most employed instruments of police investigations. This very rapid establishment of forensic genetics is yet far from being complete. In the last few years novel types of analyses have been presented to describe phenotypically a possible perpetrator. We conducted the present study among German speaking Swiss residents for two main reasons: firstly, we aimed at getting an impression of the public awareness and acceptance of the Swiss DNA database and the perception of a hypothetical DNA database containing all Swiss residents. Secondly, we wanted to get a broader picture of how people that are not working in the field of forensic genetics think about legal permission to establish phenotypic descriptions of alleged criminals by genetic means. Even though a significant number of study participants did not even know about the existence of the Swiss DNA database, its acceptance appears to be very high. Generally our results suggest that the current forensic use of DNA profiling is considered highly trustworthy. However, the acceptance of a hypothetical universal database would be only as low as about 30% among the 284 respondents to our study, mostly because people are concerned about the security of their genetic data, their privacy or a possible risk of abuse of such a database. Concerning the genetic analysis of externally visible characteristics and biogeographical ancestry, we discover a high degree of acceptance. The acceptance decreases slightly when precise characteristics are presented to the participants in detail. About half of the respondents would be in favor of the moderate use of physical traits analyses only for serious crimes threatening life, health or sexual integrity. The possible risk of discrimination and reinforcement of racism, as discussed by scholars from anthropology, bioethics, law, philosophy and sociology, is mentioned less frequently by the study participants than we would have expected. A national DNA database and the widespread use of DNA analyses for police and justice have an impact on the entire society. Therefore the concerns of lay persons from the respective population should be heard and considered. The aims of this study were to draw a broader picture of the public opinion on DNA databasing and to contribute to the debate about the possible future use of genetics to reveal phenotypic characteristics. Our data might provide an additional perspective for experts involved in regulatory or legislative processes.
Assuntos
Atitude , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/organização & administração , Genética Forense/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Impressões Digitais de DNA/métodos , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/ética , Feminino , Genética Forense/ética , Genética Forense/normas , Alemanha/etnologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , SuíçaRESUMO
Pursuant to federal statutes and to laws in all fifty states, the United States government has assembled a database containing the DNA profiles of over eleven million citizens. Without judicial authorization, the government searches each of these profiles one-hundred thousand times every day, seeking to link database subjects to crimes they are not suspected of committing. Yet, courts and scholars that have addressed DNA databasing have focused their attention almost exclusively on the constitutionality of the government's seizure of the biological samples from which the profiles are generated. This Note fills a gap in the scholarship by examining the Fourth Amendment problems that arise when the government searches its vast DNA database. This Note argues that each attempt to match two DNA profiles constitutes a Fourth Amendment search because each attempted match infringes upon database subjects' expectations of privacy in their biological relationships and physical movements. The Note further argues that database searches are unreasonable as they are currently conducted, and it suggests an adaptation of computer-search procedures to remedy the constitutional deficiency.
Assuntos
Acesso à Informação/legislação & jurisprudência , Direitos Civis/legislação & jurisprudência , Impressões Digitais de DNA/legislação & jurisprudência , Bases de Dados Factuais/legislação & jurisprudência , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Privacidade Genética/legislação & jurisprudência , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação/legislação & jurisprudência , Acesso à Informação/ética , Direitos Civis/ética , Direito Penal/ética , DNA/análise , Impressões Digitais de DNA/ética , Bases de Dados Factuais/ética , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/ética , Governo Federal , Medicina Legal/ética , Medicina Legal/legislação & jurisprudência , Privacidade Genética/ética , Humanos , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação/métodos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The Vanderbilt DNA repository, BioVU, links DNA from leftover clinical blood samples to de-identified electronic medical records (EMRs). After initiating adult sample collection, pediatric extension required consideration of ethical concerns specific to pediatrics and implementation of specialized DNA extraction methods. In the first year of pediatric sample collection, more than 11,000 samples from individuals younger than 18 years were included. We compared data from the pediatric BioVU cohort with those from the overall Vanderbilt University Medical Center pediatric population and found similar demographic characteristics; however, the BioVU cohort had higher rates of select diseases, medication exposures, and laboratory testing, demonstrating enriched representation of severe or chronic disease. The fact that the sample accumulation is not balanced may accelerate research in some cohorts while limiting the study of relatively benign conditions and the accrual of unaffected and unbiased control samples. BioVU represents a feasible model for pediatric DNA biobanking but involves both ethical and practical considerations specific to the pediatric population.
Assuntos
Bancos de Espécimes Biológicos/ética , Pesquisa Biomédica/ética , DNA/sangue , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/ética , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/ética , Adolescente , Adulto , Bancos de Espécimes Biológicos/normas , Pesquisa Biomédica/normas , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/normas , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Lactente , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Adulto JovemRESUMO
There are an increasing number of population studies collecting data and samples to illuminate gene-environment contributions to disease risk and health. The rising affordability of innovative technologies capable of generating large amounts of data helps achieve statistical power and has paved the way for new international research collaborations. Most data and sample collections can be grouped into longitudinal, disease-specific, or residual tissue biobanks, with accompanying ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI). Issues pertaining to consent, confidentiality, and oversight cannot be examined using a one-size-fits-all approach-the particularities of each biobank must be taken into account. It remains to be seen whether current governance approaches will be adequate to handle the impact of next-generation sequencing technologies on communication with participants in population biobanking studies.
Assuntos
Privacidade Genética/legislação & jurisprudência , Genoma Humano , Acesso à Informação , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/ética , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Privacidade Genética/ética , Variação Genética , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Internacionalidade , População , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Bancos de Tecidos/ética , Bancos de Tecidos/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
Few studies have explored public perspectives on community advisory board (CAB) involvement in biobank-based research. This study held focus groups (n = 7) with 48 individuals residing in the catchment of an emerging comprehensive tissue and DNA biobank in the state of Iowa. Participants recognized benefits of bringing CABs into biobank oversight, including additional levels of protection they could afford research participants. Yet, CAB goals of protecting participants were also seen as potentially antithetical to research and medical progress. Participants expressed uncertainty about the relationship of CABs to IRBs, communities, and industry. Findings suggest members of the public are in principle supportive of CAB involvement in biobanking, yet anticipate a range of problems and concerns. These perceptions will need to be proactively addressed.
Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Bancos de Espécimes Biológicos/ética , Participação da Comunidade , Confidencialidade/ética , Ética em Pesquisa , Opinião Pública , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/ética , Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa , Objetivos , Humanos , IowaRESUMO
Today, the production of knowledge in the experimental life sciences relies crucially on the use of biological data collections, such as DNA sequence databases. These collections, in both their creation and their current use, are embedded in the experimentalist tradition. At the same time, however, they exemplify the natural historical tradition, based on collecting and comparing natural facts. This essay focuses on the issues attending the establishment in 1982 of GenBank, the largest and most frequently accessed collection of experimental knowledge in the world. The debates leading to its creation-about the collection and distribution of data, the attribution of credit and authorship, and the proprietary nature of knowledge-illuminate the different moral economies at work in the life sciences in the late twentieth century. They offer perspective on the recent rise of public access publishing and data sharing in science. More broadly, this essay challenges the big picture according to which the rise of experimentalism led to the decline of natural history in the twentieth century. It argues that both traditions have been articulated into a new way of producing knowledge that has become a key practice in science at the beginning of the twenty-first century.
Assuntos
Acesso à Informação/ética , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/ética , Genoma Humano , História Natural , HumanosRESUMO
Over the past decade or more, DNA databases have been a focal point of development for the forensic field. Using this approach, forensic and law enforcement agencies have aided millions of investigations, many of which would remain unsolved but for the intelligence links provided from DNA database comparison. However, despite their widespread use and increasingly broad legislative and operational reach, there has been limited overarching performance modeling or reflection on drivers of operational or financial efficiency. This study derives an inferential model for DNA database performance using data from major national DNA database programs. Parameters that optimize desirable database outputs (matches) are isolated and discussed, as is an approach for maximizing financial efficiency and minimizing ethical impact. This research takes important steps toward identifying measures of performance for forensic DNA database operations.
Assuntos
Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos , Modelos Estatísticos , Crime , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/economia , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos/ética , Medicina Legal , HumanosRESUMO
In this brief report, the authors argue that while a lot of concerns about forensic DNA databases have been raised using arguments from biomedical ethics, these databases are used in a complete different context from other biomedical tools. Because they are used in the struggle against crime, the decision to create or store a genetic profile cannot be left to the individual. Instead, this decision is made by officials of a society. These decisions have to be based on a policy that is the concretisation of some of society's most fundamental ideas about its own nature and function. Individuals wanting to influence these decisions have to try to influence this policy, within the bounds of a state's own self-concept. This article is an attempt to reorient the discussion about forensic DNA databases from a biomedical debate to a more political-philosophical one.