Lamelloplasts and minichloroplasts in Begoniaceae: iridescence and photosynthetic functioning.

Iridoplasts (modified plastids in adaxial epidermal cells) reported from Begonia were originally hypothesized to cause iridescence, which was broadly accepted for decades. However, several species of Begonia with iridoplasts are not iridescent causing confusion. Here chloroplast ultrastructure was observed in 40 taxa of Begoniaceae to explore the phenomenon of iridescence. However, 22 Begonias and Hillebrandia were found to have iridoplasts, but only nine display visually iridescent blue to blue-green leaves. Unexpectedly, a new type of plastid, a 'minichloroplast,' was found in the abaxial epidermal cells of all taxa, but was present in adaxial epidermal cells only if iridoplasts were absent. Comparative ultrastructural study of iridoplasts and a shading experiment of selected taxa show that a taxon with iridoplasts does not inevitably have visual iridescence, but iridescence is greatly affected by the spacing between thylakoid lamellae (stoma spacing). Thus, we propose instead the name 'lamelloplast' for plastids filled entirely with regular lamellae to avoid prejudging their function. To evaluate photosynthetic performance, chlorophyll fluorescence (F v /F m ) was measured separately from the chloroplasts in the adaxial epidermis and lower leaf tissues by using leaf dermal peels. Lamelloplasts and minichloroplasts have much lower photosynthetic efficiency than mesophyll chloroplasts. Nevertheless, photosynthetic proteins (psbA protein of PSII, RuBisCo and ATPase) were detected in both plastids as well as mesophyll chloroplasts in an immunogold labeling. Spectrometry revealed additional blue to blue-green peaks in visually iridescent leaves. Micro-spectrometry detected a blue peak from single blue spots in adaxial epidermal cells confirming that the color is derived from lamelloplasts. Presence of lamelloplasts or minichloroplasts is species specific and exclusive. High prevalence of lamelloplasts in Begoniaceae, including the basal clade Hillebrandia, highlights a unique evolutionary development. These new findings clarify the association between iridescence and lamelloplasts, and with implications for new directions in the study of plastid morphogenesis.

Ultrastructure and development of non-contiguous stomatal clusters and helicocytic patterning in Begonia.

Background and Aims: Helicocytic stomata are characterized by an inward spiral of mesogenous cells surrounding a central stomatal pore. They represent a relatively rare feature that occurs in some drought-tolerant angiosperm species. In some Begonia species with thick leaves, the stomata are not only helicocytic but also clustered into groups that are spaced apart by at least one cell. This paper presents a detailed ontogenetic study of this characteristic non-contiguous stomatal patterning in a developmental and phylogenetic context. Methods: Light microscopy and both scanning and transmission electron microscopy were used to examine stomatal development in several species of Begonia. Published reports of stomatal development in Begonia and other angiosperms were reviewed to provide a comprehensive discussion of the evolution of stomatal patterning. Key Results: Helicocytic stomata develop from meristemoids that undergo a series of oriented asymmetric divisions to produce a spiral of mesogene stomatal lineage ground cells (SLGCs) surrounding a stoma. A clear developmental similarity between anisocytic and helicocytic stomata is positively correlated with the number of iterations of amplifying divisions that result in SLGCs. Stomatal clusters develop from asymmetric divisions in neighbouring SLGCs. Within each cluster, non-contiguous spacing of meristemoids is maintained by asymmetric divisions oriented away from each developing meristemoid. Conclusions: Formation of non-contiguous stomatal clusters in Begonia relies on two primary developmental factors in the epidermis: an inwardly spiralling series of amplifying divisions that result in helicocytic stomata, and the development of a variable number of meristemoids from neighbouring SLGCs within each cluster. Optimization of these features on an angiosperm phylogeny indicates that the occurrence of amplifying divisions could be pre-adaptive for these factors. Both factors have been thoroughly studied in terms of developmental genetics in Arabidopsis, suggesting gene orthologues that could be implicated in Begonia stomatal patterning.

Following the initiation and development of individual leaf primordia at the level of the shoot apical meristem: the case of distichous phyllotaxis in Begonia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: By using the technique of replicas of a developing apex it is possible to obtain a direct measure of phyllotactic parameters (plastochrone and platochronic ratio) involved in the initiation of two successive primordia at the level of the SAM. The goal of this study is to compare, in a real time setting, the value of phyllotactic parameters in distichous systems using Begonia as a case study, with the value of the same parameters in spiral phyllotactic systems. METHODS: To determine the real-time sequence of events at the level of the SAM, replicas were made of the developing apex at different intervals using previously described techniques. Impression moulds were made at 24-h intervals. The following phyllotactic parameters were measured: plastochrone, angle of divergence, plastochrone ratio and ratio between the diameter of the leaf and the apex. RESULTS: The time between the appearance of two successive leaves is 15-20 d. The average value of the plastochrone ratio (R) is 1.3, and the ratio of the leaf to the diameter of the apex (Gamma) is 2.5. The angle of divergence varies from 165 masculine to 180 masculine. The speed of advection of the primordium from the apex, varies from 0.28 to 0.37 microm d(-1). CONCLUSIONS: The speed of advection of primordia in Begonia is lower than that of Anagalis. This is not in accordance with theoretical simulations that predict the opposite. In Begonia, the plastochrone ratio does not reflect the real time of appearance of two successive primordia. The time separating the appearance of two primordia is not directly related to the distance of these two primordia from the centre of the apex but is related instead to the enlargement of leaves.