Trends in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsies in Patients With Inflammatory Breast Cancer in the US.

Importance: The standard of care for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is neoadjuvant chemotherapy, total mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and postmastectomy radiation therapy. Existing studies suggest that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may not be reliable in IBC. The use and frequency of SLNB in women with IBC is not well characterized. Objective: To determine the frequency and temporal trend of SLNB in patients with IBC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used the National Cancer Database, a nationwide hospital-based cancer registry, and included women who were diagnosed with nonmetastatic IBC and underwent axillary surgery from 2012 to 2017. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to May 2021. Exposures: Any SLNB, including SLNB alone and SLNB followed by ALND, and ALND alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: Scatterplot fit with a linear regression model were used to evaluate the yearly increase of any SLNB use. Multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the association of study variables with the outcome of any SLNB. Results: This study included a total of 1096 women (mean [SD] age, 56.1 [12.9] years) who were 18 years or older with nonmetastatic IBC diagnosed between 2012 and 2017. Of the 186 of 1096 women (17%) who received any SLNB, 137 (73.7%) were White individuals; and of the 910 of 1096 women (83%) who received an ALND only, 676 (74.3%) were White individuals. Among women undergoing any SLNB, 119 of 186 (64%) did not undergo a completion ALND. There was a statistically significant increasing trend in the use of SLNB from 2012 to 2017 (22 of 205 patients [11%] vs 32 of 148 patients [22%]; P = .004). In multivariable analysis, the use of SLNB was associated with diagnosis year (2017 vs 2012; odds ratio [OR], 2.26; 95% CI, 1.26-4.20), clinical nodal status (cN3 vs 0; OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.67), and receipt of reconstructive surgery (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.09-2.96). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that there is frequent and increasing use of SLNB in patients with IBC that is not evidence-based or supported by current treatment guidelines.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for stage II endometrial cancer: Recent utilization and outcome in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends and outcomes related to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for stage II endometrial cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational cohort study querying the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. The study population was 6,314 women with T2 endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy from 2010-2018. Exposure allocation was based on nodal evaluation type: lymphadenectomy (LND; n=4,915, 77.8%), SLN biopsy (n=340, 5.4%), or no surgical nodal evaluation (n=1,059, 16.8%). The main outcomes were (i) trends and characteristics related to nodal evaluation assessed by multinomial regression, and (ii) overall survival (OS) assessed by an inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score analysis. A sensitivity analysis was performed to examine concurrent LND in women who underwent SLN biopsy. RESULTS: The utilization of SLN biopsy increased from 1.6% to 16.1%, while the number of LND decreased from 81.5% to 65.7% between 2010-2018 (P<0.05). In multivariable analysis, the utilization of SLN biopsy increased 45% annually (adjusted-odds ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-1.54, P<0.001). The frequency of SLN biopsy alone exceeded the frequency of SLN biopsy with concurrent LND in 2017 (6.8% versus 3.4%), followed by continued increase in SLN biopsy alone (11.2% versus 4.9%) in 2018. In the weighted model, the 3-year OS rate was 79.9% for the SLN biopsy group and 78.6% for the LND group (hazard ratio 0.98, 95%Cl 0.80-1.20, P=0.831). Similarly, the SLN biopsy alone without concurrent LND had comparable OS compared to the LND group (hazard ratio 0.90, 95%CI 0.59-1.36, P=0.615). CONCLUSION: Utilization of SLN biopsy in stage II endometrial cancer increased significantly over time, and SLN biopsy-incorporated nodal assessment was not associated with worsened short-term survival outcome.

[Surgical de-escalation in gynecologic oncology]. / Désescalade chirurgicale en oncologie gynécologique.

The evolution of knowledge in gynecologic oncology is leading to surgical de-escalation in several areas, particularly in lymph node staging. Sentinel lymph node biopsy that was initially used in low and intermediate risk endometrial cancer, has now been extended to high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy plays also an important role in the nodal staging of early-stage cervical cancer. The radicality of hysterectomies in patients with early cervical cancer is under debate. Similarly, surgical staging with para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer should be performed only for few cases. Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced ovarian cancers is not recommended anymore.

Axillary surgery for breast cancer: past, present, and future.

In breast cancer surgery, there has been a major shift toward less invasive local treatment. Although axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was an integral part of surgical treatment for breast cancer, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy was developed as an accurate method for axillary staging. ALND can be avoided not only in patients with negative SLNs but also in those with one or two positive SLNs receiving breast and/or axillary radiation. On the other hand, ALND has remained the standard treatment for patients with clinically positive nodes. However, axillary reverse mapping (ARM) was developed to map and preserve arm lymphatic drainage during ALND and/or SLN biopsy. This procedure allowed reduction of the rate of arm lymphedema without increasing axillary recurrence, although patients receive postoperative chemotherapy and high-risk patients undergo axillary radiation. Standard ALND may not be necessary even for patients with clinically positive nodes who receive axillary radiation and systemic therapy. Thus, the extent of axillary surgery in breast cancer has been decreased with increased use of systemic and radiation therapy.

Axillary observation alone versus sentinel node biopsy: past, present and future perspectives.

The evolution of axillary surgery in breast cancer has led from complete axillary dissection (AD) to sentinel node biopsy (SNB). It has not stopped yet but continues with a progressive de-escalation of surgical procedures aiming at axillary conservation. In parallel, the meaning of axillary surgery has changed as well. Over time, the dual role of both a therapeutic and a staging procedure has decreased leaving room to other modalities to treat and stage breast cancer. Although, the gold standard for axillary staging in early breast cancer remains SNB, the idea that axillary surgery could be even omitted has been proposed. The concept of abandoning axillary surgery is revolutionary but not new. Historical literature provides interesting data on patients who did not receive any axillary treatment at all with no impact on their survival. Starting from this, several ongoing trials are working to demonstrate that in selected breast cancer cohorts the information deriving from axillary surgery is superfluous and "axillary observation" alone is as effective as SNB. Whilst surgery has been de-escalated to less invasive procedures, systemic treatment, radiotherapy, multigene assays and advanced imaging modalities have gained ground in the management of breast cancer. New research is expected to help select the subgroups of patients for whom axillary surgery is not necessary anymore. This is a qualitative review reporting the most relevant literature data from historical trials on the omission of axillary surgery to the most recent and ongoing ones.

Axillary management after neoadjuvant treatment.

Since its introduction nearly 30 years ago, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become the standard technique to stage the axilla for the great majority of patients with early breast cancer. While the accuracy of SLNB in clinically node-negative patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is similar to the upfront surgery setting, modifications of the technique to improve the false negative rate are necessary in node-positive patients at presentation. Currently, patients who present with matted nodes, cN1 patients who fail to downstage to cN0 with NAC and those with pathological residual disease have an indication to undergo axillary lymph node dissection. Ongoing trials will confirm if extensive nodal irradiation can replace surgery in patients with residual nodal disease after NAC and if nodal radiotherapy can be omitted in patients who achieve nodal pathological complete response. The aim of this review was to focus on the open questions on the management of the axilla after NAC.

Ongoing clinical trials on axillary management.

INTRODUCTION: Within the last 50 years the management of patients with breast cancer has changed dramatically with a significant de-escalation of the role and magnitude of surgery, both for the management of the primary tumor and for the management of the axilla. In the management of the axilla of patients with early stage breast cancer (EBC) and clinically uninvolved axilla (cN0), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was gradually replaced by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) saving more than 60-70% of patients from an unnecessary dissection. Further studies confirmed that isolated tumor cells or micrometastases found on the SLN had no further benefit from ALND sparing even more patients from an unnecessary ALND. Eventually, the Z0011 and other studies showed that even patients with 1-2 positive SLN can be spared from ALND provided they fulfill certain criteria. Still though there were many flaws in these studies and further research was necessary to generalize the results of these studies to a wider target group. Meanwhile, there is a clear view that many low risk patients if they have their axilla evaluated via US and are not found to have suspicious nodes, it is highly unlikely to have involved axilla. This let to studies evaluating the non-surgical management of the axilla. Finally, in the post neoadjuvant setting 3 randomized controlled trials showed that under certain circumstances SLNB can be done after the NAC even in patients who initially had involved axilla and was converted to clinically uninvolved (cN1→cN0). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Library Controlled Trials Register as well as National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.Gov database have been consulted up to May 2020. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We studied and described the ongoing trials on patients not undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and we discussed the eligibility criteria, the comparison arms and the expected outcomes. We further examined the ongoing trials on patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the same manner. CONCLUSIONS: Although we have covered a long way in the journey of eliminating axillary surgery, there are still lots of questions to be answered and trials to be conducted. We anticipate the results of the ongoing trials to provide the necessary evidence to safely de-escalate more the axillary surgery, both in the non-neoadjuvant as well as in the neoadjuvant setting, hoping that in the not so far future the axillary surgery will eventually perish.

The role of sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial carcinoma.

Endometrial cancer is the most commonly diagnosed gynecological malignancy in developing countries, and the second malignancy after cervical cancer in developing countries. The primary treatment is based on surgical and pathologic staging including extrafascial type A radical hysterectomy bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic and latero-aortic lymphadenectomy. Minimally invasive surgery is the most widely used technique. Sentinel node biopsy is part of this concept and has reached the management of endometrial cancer. The aim of this review was to describe the history, the different injection techniques and results of sentinel node biopsy, and analyze the future role of this technique in endometrial carcinoma.

Analysis of Surgical Trends for Axillary Lymph Node Management in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using the NSQIP Database: Are We Following National Guidelines?

BACKGROUND: For patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), multiple national cancer organizations recommend that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) be offered when treated with mastectomy, but not when treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study analyzes national surgical trends of SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in DCIS patients undergoing breast surgery with the aim to quantify deviations from national guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2017 identified patients with DCIS. Patients were categorized by their primary method of breast surgery, i.e. mastectomy or BCS, then further categorized by their axillary lymph node (ALN) management, i.e. no intervention, SLNB, or ALND. Data analysis was conducted via linear regression and a non-parametric Mann-Kendall test to assess a temporal trend and Sen's slope. RESULTS: Overall, 43,448 patients with DCIS met the inclusion criteria: 20,504 underwent mastectomy and 22,944 underwent BCS. Analysis of DCIS patients from 2005 to 2017 revealed that ALND decreased and SLNB increased in every subgroup, regardless of surgical treatment modality. Evaluation in the mastectomy group increased overall: mastectomy alone increased from 57.1 to 65.8% (p < 0.01) and mastectomy with immediate reconstruction increased from 58.5 to 72.1% (p < 0.01). Increases also occurred in the total BCS population: partial mastectomy increased from 14.0 to 21.1% and oncoplastic surgery increased from 10.5 to 23.0% (both p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite national guideline recommendations for the management of ALN surgery in DCIS patients, approximately 20-30% of cases continue to not follow these guidelines. This warrants further education for surgeons and patients.

Twenty-five years of change in the management of the axilla in breast cancer.

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is now used worldwide. It has led to many changes in how we manage the axilla in patients with breast cancer. This review covers four areas of management of the axilla in breast cancer: assessing the clinically node-negative axilla, managing the clinically negative axilla found to be involved at SLN biopsy, management of the clinically positive axilla in the context of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and treatment of the diseased axilla when radical therapy is required. We suggest that the evidence supports an optimum number of 3 nodes to be removed for accurate SLN biopsy. Breast cancer departments that have not adopted Z0011 patient management cannot continue to avoid change. The evidence is clear: Not all patients with limited axillary nodal disease on sentinel node biopsy need axillary lymph node dissection. For patients who do need axillary treatment, axillary radiotherapy continues to be under-used. Patients undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy can be safely assessed by post-therapy SLN biopsy, with retrieval of any previously biopsied involved nodes by targeted axillary dissection. There is much to support the trend to doing less in the axilla. We are obliged to act based on the available robust clinical trial data in a way that limits morbidity while at the same time does not increase the risk of disease recurrence.

[Research progress of sentinel lymph node biopsy and regional dissection in melanoma].

Melanoma is a malignant tumor derived from the skin and mucous membrane, the epidemiological data showed that the incidence of melanoma elevated rapidly in the last decade. Early lymph node metastasis is a distinguishing characteristic of melanoma. The assessment of regional lymph nodes is a vital factor for melanoma staging and comprehensive therapeutic strategies. The sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) plays an important role in this comprehensive diagnosis and treatment system. Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) with positive sentinel lymph node was accepted by traditional theories. But it has recently been questioned via the latest global clinical trial. CLND limited the benefit for melanoma specific survival. However, SLNB is the reliable procedure for staging and prognostic evaluation of melanoma patients with positive sentinel lymph node, and CLND can significantly improve the local control and decrease the regional recurrence according to the evidence-based medicine. The authors summary the recently correlational research of SLNB and CLND in melanoma in this review.

Uptake of sentinel lymph node procedures in women with vulvar cancer over time in a population based study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate trends in uptake of sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedures over time and associated factors in women with vulvar cancer. METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort study identified women with invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the vulva using health administrative data for the province of Ontario, Canada, between 2008 and 2016. Patients who underwent SLN procedures were compared to those who had groin node dissection (GND). Multivariable analysis was used to identify factors associated with SLN procedures. RESULTS: 1385 patients with SCC of the vulva were identified; 1079 had a surgical procedure. Only those with groin node assessment were included in the study cohort (n = 732, 68%). SLN procedures were done in 52%. When comparing SLN versus GND, the rate of SLNs was significantly different by year of diagnosis (P < 0.001), associated comorbidity (P < 0.001) and institution (P < 0.0001). The rates of SLNs by institution with gynecologic oncologist were variable and ranged from 32% to 79% among 9 centers. There were no differences in age, income quintile, and urban/rural residence. The proportion of SLN procedures increased from 30.1% (CI 18.9-45.6) in 2008 to 65.2% (CI 36.5-107.6) in 2016. On multivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with SLN procedures were more recent year of diagnosis (OR 7.9, CI 2.7-23.5) associated comorbidities (OR 2.7, CI 1.5-5.0) and institution (Site 5, OR 19.6 [CI 3.6-108.3] and Site 6, [OR 6, CI 1.1-33.4]). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of SLN procedures in women with vulvar cancer has increased over time, but uptake is not uniform across institutions. Barriers to uptake should be explored.

Trends in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Enactment for Cutaneous Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Over recent years, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) recommendations in guidelines for cutaneous melanoma have changed considerably. We aimed to assess trends in enactment of SLNB to evaluate to what extent guidelines were adhered to, and to identify clinical and pathological determinants of (non-)adherence. METHODS: Clinicopathological data from the Dutch nationwide network and registry of histopathology and cytopathology were retrieved from patients diagnosed with primary cutaneous melanoma in The Netherlands between 2003 and 2014. SLNB enactment was analyzed per year. Multivariable regression models were developed to assess the determinants of SLNB enactment. RESULTS: A total of 51,510 primary cutaneous melanomas in 49,514 patients were diagnosed, of which 24,603 melanomas were eligible for SLNB as they were staged T1b or higher. In practice, only 9761 (39.7%) patients underwent SLNB, with an increasing trend from 39.1% in 2003 to 47.8% in 2014 (p < 0.001). A total of 759 (2.9%) of 26,426 patients without SLNB indication underwent SLNB anyway. Variables significantly associated with enactment of SLNB were male sex, younger age, and melanoma on sites other than the head and neck. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was an increasing trend in time in SLNB enactment, enactment of SLNB did not comply well with recommendations in (inter)national guidelines. Female sex, higher age, and melanoma located on the head and neck were associated with non-enactment of SLNB.

[Breast cancer management before 40 years: what change in one decade? A retrospective study at the "Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine": 2002-2012]. / Prise en charge du cancer du sein avant 40 ans : quelle évolution en une décennie ? Étude rétrospective réalisée à l'Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine : 2002-2012.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer of young women has medico-psychological issues, particularly in the perspective of "after cancer" period. The objective of the study was to analyze the changes in management, in a decade including the publication of Cancer Plans I and II. METHODS: This retrospective unicentric study involved two populations of women aged 40 and treated at the "Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine" in 2002-2004 (P1) and 2012-2014 (P2). Epidemiological-demographic, histological, diagnostic and therapeutic sequences were analyzed. RESULTS: 216 patients were included. The mean age was 35.7 years (range 22-40), with no significant epidemiological difference, except for an increased rate of obesity in P2. Preoperative biopsies became almost systematic and the pre-therapeutic care plan rate increased over the decade from 3.8% to 8% (p < 0.001). The rate of breast-conserving treatment remained stable. The sentinel lymph node rate increased from 4.4% in P1 to 31.9% in P2 (p < 0.001), while the rate of lymph node dissection decreased (p < 0.001) between the two periods. Resort to breast nurses, psycho-oncologists, fertility experts and oncogenetic consultations has also increased. CONCLUSION: There is an improvement in the care and management of young women under 40 because of the first Cancer Plans. A study about the impact on the prognosis and a reflection to improve the experience of illness for these women are to lead.

Precisión, también en el tratamiento locorregional / Precision, also in locoregional treatment

No disponible