Combretastatin A4-phosphate and its potential in veterinary oncology: a review.

For many years, research on anticancer therapy has focussed almost exclusively on targeting cancer cells directly, to selectively kill them or restrict their growth. But limited advances in this strategy have led researchers to shift their attention to other potential targets. Active research is now on-going on targeting tumour stroma. Vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) appear a promising class of anticancer drugs that are currently under investigation as a sole or combined therapy in human cancer patients. This article will briefly touch on the history and biology of combretastatin A4-phosphate (CA4P) as a typical example of VDAs and will concentrate on the side effects that can be expected when used in veterinary patients. Particularly, the pathogenesis of these side effects and how they may be prevented and/or treated will be discussed. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the potentials of CA4P as anticancer therapy in veterinary oncology patients.

Cardiovascular toxicity profiles of vascular-disrupting agents.

BACKGROUND: Vascular-disrupting agents (VDAs) represent a new class of chemotherapeutic agent that targets the existing vasculature in solid tumors. Preclinical and early-phase trials have demonstrated the promising therapeutic benefits of VDAs but have also uncovered a distinctive toxicity profile highlighted by cardiovascular events. METHODS: We reviewed all preclinical and prospective phase I-III clinical trials published up to August 2010 in MEDLINE and the American Association of Cancer Research and American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting abstracts of small-molecule VDAs, including combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P), combretastatin A1 phosphate (CA1P), MPC-6827, ZD6126, AVE8062, and ASA404. RESULTS: Phase I and II studies of CA1P, ASA404, MPC-6827, and CA4P all reported cardiovascular toxicities, with the most common cardiac events being National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 3) grade 1-3 hypertension, tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, and myocardial infarction. Cardiac events were dose-limiting toxicities in phase I trials with VDA monotherapy and combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Early-phase trials of VDAs have revealed a cardiovascular toxicity profile similar to that of their vascular-targeting counterparts, the angiogenesis inhibitors. As these agents are added to the mainstream chemotherapeutic arsenal, careful identification of baseline cardiovascular risk factors would seem to be a prudent strategy. Close collaboration with cardiology colleagues for early indicators of serious cardiac adverse events will likely minimize toxicity while optimizing the therapeutic potential of VDAs and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

Myocardial stunning following combined modality combretastatin-based chemotherapy: two case reports and review of the literature.

Myocardial stunning, known as stress cardiomyopathy, broken-heart syndrome, transient left ventricular apical ballooning, and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, has been reported after many extracardiac stressors, but not following chemotherapy. We report 2 cases with characteristic electrocardiographic and echocardiographic features following combined modality therapy with combretastatin, a vascular-disrupting agent being studied for treatment of anaplastic thyroid cancer. In 1 patient, an ECG performed per protocol 18 hours after drug initiation showed deep, symmetric T-wave inversions in limb leads I and aVL and precordial leads V(2) through V(6). Echocardiography showed mildly reduced overall left ventricular systolic function with akinesis of the entire apex. The patient had mild elevations of troponin I. Coronary angiography revealed no epicardial coronary artery disease. The electrocardiographic and echocardiographic abnormalities resolved after several weeks. The patient remains stable from a cardiovascular standpoint and has not had a recurrence during follow-up. An electrocardiogram performed per protocol in a second patient showed deep, symmetric T-wave inversions throughout the precordial leads and a prolonged QT interval. Echocardiography showed mildly reduced left ventricular function with hypokinesis of the apical-septal wall. Acute coronary syndrome was ruled out, and both the electrocardiographic and echocardiographic changes resolved at follow-up. Although the patient remained pain-free without recurrence of anginal symptoms during long-term follow-up, the patient developed progressive malignancy and died.

Phase I clinical trial of weekly combretastatin A4 phosphate: clinical and pharmacokinetic results.

PURPOSE: A phase I trial was performed with combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P), a novel tubulin-binding agent that has been shown to rapidly reduce blood flow in animal tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The drug was delivered by a 10-minute weekly infusion for 3 weeks followed by a week gap, with intrapatient dose escalation. Dose escalation was accomplished by doubling until grade 2 toxicity was seen. The starting dose was 5 mg/m2. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients received 167 infusions. CA4P was rapidly converted to the active combretastatin A4 (CA4), which was further metabolized to the glucuronide. CA4 area under the curve (AUC) increased from 0.169 at 5 mg/m2 to 3.29 micromol * h/L at 114 mg/m2. The mean CA4 AUC in eight patients at 68 mg/m2 was 2.33 micromol * h/L compared with 5.8 micromol * h/L at 25 mg/kg (the lowest effective dose) in the mouse. The only toxicity that possibly was related to the drug dose up to 40 mg/m2 was tumor pain. Dose-limiting toxicity was reversible ataxia at 114 mg/m2, vasovagal syncope and motor neuropathy at 88 mg/m2, and fatal ischemia in previously irradiated bowel at 52 mg/m2. Other drug-related grade 2 or higher toxicities seen in more than one patient were pain, lymphopenia, fatigue, anemia, diarrhea, hypertension, hypotension, vomiting, visual disturbance, and dyspnea. One patient at 68 mg/m2 had improvement in liver metastases of adrenocortical carcinoma. CONCLUSION: CA4P was well tolerated in 14 of 16 patients at 52 or 68 mg/m2; these are doses at which tumor blood flow reduction has been recorded.