Clinical Presentations of Bupropion Prescription Drug Misuse: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Among prescribers, bupropion is considered a substance of low misuse potential, with some studies showing lesser misuse potential than caffeine. However, several case reports exist of recreational bupropion misuse and diversion. Our goal is to understand at-risk populations, clinical courses, interventions, and outcomes after acute ingestion of bupropion via oral, intravenous route, and insufflation. METHODS: The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO on August 5, 2023. We conducted a systematic literature search on July 30, 2023, utilizing 8 databases with the help of the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) term "Bupropion" in the context of misuse and abuse. Ultimately, we found 17 articles with qualitative synthesis relevant to our study objective and meeting our inclusion/exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Bupropion insufflation and intravenous injection occur almost exclusively in patients with a substance use disorder history, with a preponderance of patients with stimulant use disorder or multiple substance use disorders. Additionally, many were dual-diagnosis patients with a history of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and stimulant use disorder, treated with bupropion. Patients describe the effects of bupropion insufflation/IV injection as a milder "cocaine-like" high that is brief, with less severe withdrawal effects of anxiety and agitation. The most common side effect at presentation was tachycardia, followed by seizures responsive to IV benzodiazepines. IV injection seems particularly insulting to the vascular system, with cellulitis, tissue necrosis, and digital ischemia as documented adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights the bupropion misuse potential in certain patient populations and serves to increase awareness among clinicians. Additional patient screening, monitoring and follow-up, surveillance, and further research are needed to investigate and prevent bupropion misuse in at-risk patient populations entirely.

Suicide ideation and male-female differences in major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore male-female differences in suicide ideation (SI) and suicide risk factors in major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: We analysed 482 adults (sample 1) and 438 elderly outpatients (sample 2) with MDD. Sample 1 was treated with different antidepressant combinations (escitalopram; bupropion plus escitalopram; venlafaxine plus mirtazapine) and assessed by means of the Concise Health Risk Tracking (SI), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Altman Mania Rating Scale and Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire. Sample 2 was treated with venlafaxine and assessed using the Hamilton scale for depression, Anxiety Sensitivity Index and Penn State Worry Questionnaire for anxiety, Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation and Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. RESULTS: In sample 1, females had greater depression severity (O.R 0.961 99%CI: 0.929 - 0.995), males reported more alcohol abuse (O.R 1.299 99%CI: 1.118 - 1.509) and active SI (O.R 1.109 99%CI: 1.005 - 1.255). In sample 2 men showed more severe SI (O.R 1.067; 99%CI: 1.014 - 1.122) and weight loss (OR = 5.89 99%CI: 1.01 - 34.19), women more gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In these selected samples, although women had more severe depression, men had more suicide risk factors. Such differences might contribute to men's increased suicide risk.

In major depressive disorder sex differences affect the clinical expression of depressive episodes. In comparison to men, women endorse higher levels of overall depression in adult MDD and more somatic anxiety and gastrointestinal symptoms in late-life MDD.After controlling for confounding variables, males have more severe SI and a larger number of suicide risk factors (eg. alcohol abuse; weight loss). The association between male sex and SI is detectable in both adults and elderly patients with MDD.Further studies are necessary to elucidate how sex differences in suicide ideation and suicide risk factors are related to men's increased suicide risk.

Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching in patients with treatment-resistant depression or major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: To report the first and largest systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) or major depressive disorder(MDD). METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature retrieval via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane until April 2023 for RCT, which evaluated the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching for patients with TRD or MDD. Outcomes measured were changes in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), response and remission rate, and serious adverse events. RESULTS: Five RCTs, including 4480 patients, were included for meta-analysis. Among them, two RCTs were rated as "high risk" in three aspects (allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel and blinding of outcome assessment) because of the non-blind method, and the quality evaluation of the remaining works of literature was "low risk". Augmentation treatment with Aripiprazole (A-ARI) was associated with a significant higher response rate compared with augmentation treatment with bupropion (A-BUP) (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.25; P = 0.0007; I2 = 23%). Besides, A-ARI had a significant higher remission rate compared with switching to bupropion (S-BUP) (RR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.49; P = 0.05; I2 = 59%) and A-BUP had a significant higher remission rate compared with S-BUP (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.36; P = 0.0004; I2 = 0%). In addition, there was no significant difference in remission rate(RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.17; P = 0.42; I2 = 33%), improvement of MADRS(WMD: -2.07; 95% CI: -5.84, 1.70; P = 0.28; I2 = 70%) between A-ARI and A-BUP. No significant difference was observed in adverse events and serious adverse events among the three treatment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: A-ARI may be a better comprehensive antidepressant treatment strategy than A-BUP or S-BUP for patients with TRD or MDD. More large-scale, multi-center, double-blind RCTs are needed to further evaluated the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching treatment strategies.

Clinical Evaluation of the Effect of Encorafenib on Bupropion, Rosuvastatin, and Coproporphyrin I and Considerations for Statin Coadministration.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Encorafenib is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma or metastatic colorectal cancer, respectively, with selected BRAF V600 mutations. A clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) study was designed to evaluate the effect of encorafenib on rosuvastatin, a sensitive substrate of OATP1B1/3 and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), and bupropion, a sensitive CYP2B6 substrate. Coproporphyrin I (CP-I), an endogenous substrate for OATP1B1, was measured in a separate study to deconvolute the mechanism of transporter DDI. METHODS: DDI study participants received a single oral dose of rosuvastatin (10 mg) and bupropion (75 mg) on days - 7, 1, and 14 and continuous doses of encorafenib (450 mg QD) and binimetinib (45 mg BID) starting on day 1. The CP-I data were collected from participants in a phase 3 study who received encorafenib (300 mg QD) and cetuximab (400 mg/m2 initial dose, then 250 mg/m2 QW). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis was performed using noncompartmental and compartmental methods. RESULTS: Bupropion exposure was not increased, whereas rosuvastatin Cmax and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) increased approximately 2.7 and 1.6-fold, respectively, following repeated doses of encorafenib and binimetinib. Increase in CP-I was minimal, suggesting that the primary effect of encorafenib on rosuvastatin is through BCRP. Categorization of statins on the basis of their metabolic and transporter profile suggests pravastatin would have the least potential for interaction when coadministered with encorafenib. CONCLUSION: The results from these clinical studies suggest that encorafenib does not cause clinically relevant CYP2B6 induction or inhibition but is an inhibitor of BCRP and may also inhibit OATP1B1/3 to a lesser extent. Based on these results, it may be necessary to consider switching statins or reducing statin dosage accordingly for coadministration with encorafenib. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03864042, registered 6 March 2019.

Midostaurin drug interaction profile: a comprehensive assessment of CYP3A, CYP2B6, and CYP2C8 drug substrates, and oral contraceptives in healthy participants.

PURPOSE: Midostaurin, approved for treating FLT-3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia and advanced systemic mastocytosis, is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 to two major metabolites, and may inhibit and/or induce CYP3A, CYP2B6, and CYP2C8. Two studies investigated the impact of midostaurin on CYP substrate drugs and oral contraceptives in healthy participants. METHODS: Using sentinel dosing for participants' safety, the effects of midostaurin at steady state following 25-day (Study 1) or 24-day (Study 2) dosing with 50 mg twice daily were evaluated on CYP substrates, midazolam (CYP3A4), bupropion (CYP2B6), and pioglitazone (CYP2C8) in Study 1; and monophasic oral contraceptives (containing ethinylestradiol [EES] and levonorgestrel [LVG]) in Study 2. RESULTS: In Study 1, midostaurin resulted in a 10% increase in midazolam peak plasma concentrations (Cmax), and 3-4% decrease in total exposures (AUC). Bupropion showed a 55% decrease in Cmax and 48-49% decrease in AUCs. Pioglitazone showed a 10% decrease in Cmax and 6% decrease in AUC. In Study 2, midostaurin resulted in a 26% increase in Cmax and 7-10% increase in AUC of EES; and a 19% increase in Cmax and 29-42% increase in AUC of LVG. Midostaurin 50 mg twice daily for 28 days ensured that steady-state concentrations of midostaurin and the active metabolites were achieved by the time of CYP substrate drugs or oral contraceptive dosing. No safety concerns were reported. CONCLUSION: Midostaurin neither inhibits nor induces CYP3A4 and CYP2C8, and weakly induces CYP2B6. Midostaurin at steady state has no clinically relevant PK interaction on hormonal contraceptives. All treatments were well tolerated.

Lo clásico y lo nuevo en el tratamiento del sobrepeso y la obesidad / The classic and the new in the treatment of overweight and obesity

Así como planteamos en la primera entrega de esta serie de artículos de actualización sobre la obesidad, resulta urgente revisar el abordaje tradicional que la comunidad médica le ofrece a las personas con cuerpos gordos. En este segundo artículo desarrollaremos en profundidad diferentes alternativas terapéuticas para los pacientes que desean bajar de peso:plan alimentario, actividad física, tratamiento farmacológico y cirugía metabólica. (AU)

As we proposed in the first issue of this series of articles, it is urgent to review the traditional approach that the medical community offers to people with fat bodies. This second article will develop different therapeutic alternatives for patients who want to lose weight: eating plans, physical activity, pharmacological treatment, and metabolic surgery. (AU)

Uso indebido de bupropión por insuflación nasal con desenlace fatal: reporte de un caso y revisión / Abuse of bupropion by nasal insufflation with fatal outcome: report of a case and review

Introducción. El bupropión es la única catinona sintética aprobada por la FDA, con una creciente popularidad en la práctica clínica debido a su amplio rango de acción y la falta de efectos secundarios sexuales. Sin embargo, su efecto estimulante similar al de las anfetaminas ha hecho crecer la preocupación respecto a su uso recreativo. Objetivos y métodos. En este manuscrito informamos un caso de uso indebido de bupropión mediante insuflación nasal con desenlace fatal y realizamos una breve revisión deluso recreativo de bupropión. Resultados. Presentamos el caso de un hombre de unos50 años, con abuso prolongado de bupropión principalmente por insuflación nasal, que falleció súbitamente unas dos semanas después de ser dado de alta por un infarto agudo de miocardio tipo 2 secundario a sobredosis de bupropión. A lo largo de las últimas décadas, varios estudios han informado un uso indebido cada vez mayor de bupropión por vías no orales, especialmente a través de la insuflación nasal, y el uso intravenoso, particularmente en pacientes con antecedentes de abuso de sustancias, adolescentes o en entornos penitenciarios. A pesar de que la mayoría de los pacientes tienen efectos secundarios de leves a moderados, consecuencias devastadoras, tales como convulsiones refractarias o shock cardiogénico refractario, pueden ocurrir en caso de sobredosis, lo que exige un reconocimiento oportuno y un enfoque rápido para prevenir estos resultados importantes. En caso de sobredosis, no existe un antídoto específico disponible ni un tratamiento curativo aprobado, su manejo se centra en el tratamiento de los síntomas. Conclusiones. El bupropión es un antidepresivo eficaz, sin embargo, tiene potencial para uso recreativo, especialmente en grupos de alto riesgo. Este documento alerta a todos los médicos sobre el problema emergente relacionado con el uso indebido de bupropión y agrega algunas ideas sobre su reconocimiento y manejo oportunos. (AU)

The compulsion zone explains the self-administration of cocaine, RTI-55 and bupropion in rats.

Rats that reliably self-administered cocaine also reliably self-administered the cocaine analog RTI-55 and bupropion. The inter-injection intervals of these dopamine transporter (DAT) inhibitors were regular at a given unit dose and increased as a function of unit dose. However, the mean rate of intake differed widely, ranging from 731 to 459 to 2.1 nmol/kg∙min-1 for bupropion, cocaine and RTI-55 respectively, a dramatic 348-fold range. An analysis of inter-injection intervals as a function of unit dose generated values for the mean satiety threshold of 50.6, 5.1 and 0.7 nmol/kg and t1/2 of 56.7, 9.3 and 255.6 min for bupropion, cocaine and RTI-55, respectively. The difference in rate of intake of bupropion and RTI-55 relative to cocaine is a product of their 0.1 and 7.3 fold difference in PD potency and their 6.1 and 27.5 fold difference in t1/2. Additionally, the relative durations of lever-pressing following termination of drug access correlated with the t1/2 estimates. It is hypothesized this duration represents the time required for the drug concentration to fall from the satiety threshold below the priming threshold (the minimum DAT inhibitor level that will induce lever-pressing). This indicates that the time needed for an animal to cease lever pressing following termination of access to the DAT inhibitor is predominately a function of the PK properties of the agonist. The self-administration behavior paradigm in the context of the compulsion zone theory can be used as a bioassay to determine the PK/PD properties of indirect dopamine receptor agonists.

Randomized Controlled Phase II Evaluation of Two Dose Levels of Bupropion Versus Placebo for Sexual Desire in Female Cancer Survivors: NRG-CC004.

PURPOSE: Because of the negative impact of cancer treatment on female sexual function, effective treatments are warranted. The purpose of this multisite study was to evaluate the ability of two dose levels of extended-release bupropion, a dopaminergic agent, to improve sexual desire more than placebo at 9 weeks, measured by the desire subscale of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and to evaluate associated toxicities. METHODS: Postmenopausal women diagnosed with breast or gynecologic cancer and low baseline FSFI desire scores (< 3.3), who had completed definitive cancer therapy, were eligible. Women were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg or 300 mg once daily of extended-release bupropion or a matching placebo. t-tests were performed on the FSFI desire subscale to evaluate whether there was a significantly greater change from baseline to 9 weeks between placebo and each bupropion arm as the primary end point. Sixty-two patients per arm provided 80% power using a one-sided t-test. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty women were randomly assigned from 72 institutions through the NRG Oncology NCORP network. At 9 weeks, there were no statistically significant differences in change of the desire subscale scores between groups; participants in all three arms reported improvement. The mean changes for each arm were placebo 0.62 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.18), 150-mg once daily bupropion 0.64 (SD = 0.95), and 300-mg once daily bupropion 0.60 (SD = 0.89). Total and subscale scores on the FSFI were low throughout the study, indicating dysfunction in all groups. CONCLUSION: Bupropion was not more effective than placebo in improving the desire subscale of the FSFI. Subscale and total scores of the FSFI demonstrated dysfunction throughout the 9 weeks of the study. More research is needed to support sexual function in female cancer survivors.

Inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes and uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferases by vicagrel in human liver microsomes: A prediction of potential drug-drug interactions.

Vicagrel, an antiplatelet drug candidate targeting platelet P2Y12 receptor and has finished its phase II clinical trial. The inhibition of six major cytochrome P450 enzymes (P450) (CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4) and six UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) (UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7) by vicagrel was evaluated using pooled human liver microsomes and specific probe substrates. Physiology-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) simulation was further applied to predict the in vivo drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential between vicagrel and bupropion as well as S-mephenytoin. The results suggested that vicagrel inhibited CYP2B6 and CYP2C19 potently with apparent IC50 values of 1.6 and 2.0 µM, respectively. In terms of mode of reversible inhibition, vicagrel exhibited mixed-type inhibition of CYP2B6-catalyzed bupropion hydroxylation and noncompetitive inhibition of CYP2C19-mediated S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation with Ki values of 0.19 µM and 1.2 µM, respectively. Vicagrel displayed profound time-dependent inhibition towards CYP2B6 with maximal rate constant of inactivation (kinact) and half-maximal inactivator concentration (KI) values of 0.062 min-1 and 1.52 µM, respectively. No time-dependent inhibition by vicagrel was noted for CYP2C19. For UGT, negligible to moderate inhibition by vicagrel was observed with IC50 values of >50.0, >50.0, 28.2, 8.7, >50.0 and 28.2 µM for UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9 and UGT2B7, respectively. In terms of mode of reversible inhibition, vicagrel exhibited mixed-type inhibition of UGT1A6-catalyzed N-Acetylserotonin ß-D-glucuronidation with a Ki value of 5.6 µM. No time-dependent inhibition by vicagrel was noted for UGT1A6. PBPK simulation indicated that neither altered AUC nor Cmax of bupropion and S-mephenytoin was observed in the presence of vicagrel. Our study provides inhibitory constants for future DDI prediction between vicagrel and drug substrates of CYP2B6, CYP2C19 and UGT1A6. In addition, our simulation suggests the lack of clinically important DDI between vicagrel and bupropion or S-mephenytoin.

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Bupropion Add-on to Olanzapine or Risperidone in Overweight Individuals With Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Weight gain due to antipsychotics is a challenging clinical problem because, to date, no effective pharmacological strategies have been found. Bupropion is often used in people with schizophrenia for smoking cessation and is well tolerated. However, studies on its use as weight loss treatment are scarce. The aim of the study was to examine the effectiveness of bupropion as a single weight loss treatment in overweight individuals maintained on long-term olanzapine or risperidone. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week study included 26 overweight (body mass index ≥27 kg/m2) individuals with schizophrenia maintained on olanzapine (10-20 mg/d) or risperidone (2-4 mg/d). Participants were randomly allocated to a study group that received bupropion (150-300 mg/d) or to a placebo group. The positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale were used to assess severity of psychosis at baseline and end of study (8 weeks). RESULTS: Bupropion addition, but not placebo, was associated with a significant reduction in body weight. Severity of psychotic symptoms was not altered in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the efficacy of bupropion, compared with placebo, in patients maintained on chronic treatment with olanzapine or risperidone, both known to be major contributors to significant weight gain.

Frequently Reported Adverse Events With Smoking Cessation Medications: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence, severity, and clinical course of frequently reported adverse events (AEs) after treatment with smoking cessation pharmacotherapies. METHODS: This was a multinational, multicenter, post hoc analysis of frequently reported treatment-emergent AEs from a large, phase 4, double-blind, randomized, triple-dummy, placebo-controlled trial (EAGLES), conducted between November 30, 2011, and January 13, 2015, that included smokers with and without psychiatric disorders (N=8144). Treatments were varenicline 1 mg twice daily, bupropion sustained-release 150 mg twice daily, and nicotine patch 21 mg once daily with tapering (12-week treatment, 12-week nontreatment follow-up), with incidence, time to onset, and duration of frequently reported AEs (≥5% of participants in any treatment group) measured. Risk differences for AEs for varenicline and bupropion vs nicotine patch were compared. RESULTS: Across frequently reported AEs, nausea, insomnia, abnormal dreams, anxiety, irritability, dry mouth, fatigue, and application site pruritus differed significantly in active treatment vs placebo groups. Risk differences were as follows: for nausea with varenicline vs nicotine patch, 15.50% (95% CI, 13.20% to 17.80%); for insomnia with bupropion vs nicotine patch, 2.58% (CI, 0.65% to 4.51%); and for abnormal dreams with varenicline and bupropion vs nicotine patch, -2.49% (CI, -4.35% to -0.64%) and -5.60% (CI, -7.27% to -3.93%), respectively. Frequently reported AEs of severe intensity and treatment discontinuation were experienced by less than 1.5% and less than 3% of participants across all groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Active treatments were well tolerated with comparable AE profiles. Most AEs are not clinically important, and prescribers can reassure patients that those experienced will be manageable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01456936.

Medication Use in the Management of Comorbidities Among Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder From a Large Nationwide Insurance Database.

Importance: Although there is no pharmacological treatment for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) itself, behavioral and pharmacological therapies have been used to address its symptoms and common comorbidities. A better understanding of the medications used to manage comorbid conditions in this growing population is critical; however, most previous efforts have been limited in size, duration, and lack of broad representation. Objective: To use a nationally representative database to uncover trends in the prevalence of co-occurring conditions and medication use in the management of symptoms and comorbidities over time among US individuals with ASD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study mined a nationwide, managed health plan claims database containing more than 86 million unique members. Data from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019, were used to analyze prescription frequency and diagnoses of comorbidities. A total of 26 722 individuals with ASD who had been prescribed at least 1 of 24 medications most commonly prescribed to treat ASD symptoms or comorbidities during the 6-year study period were included in the analysis. Exposures: Diagnosis codes for ASD based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision. Main Outcomes and Measures: Quantitative estimates of prescription frequency for the 24 most commonly prescribed medications among the study cohort and the most common comorbidities associated with each medication in this population. Results: Among the 26 722 individuals with ASD included in the analysis (77.7% male; mean [SD] age, 14.45 [9.40] years), polypharmacy was common, ranging from 28.6% to 31.5%. Individuals' prescription regimens changed frequently within medication classes, rather than between classes. The prescription frequency of a specific medication varied considerably, depending on the coexisting diagnosis of a given comorbidity. Of the 24 medications assessed, 15 were associated with at least a 15% prevalence of a mood disorder, and 11 were associated with at least a 15% prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. For patients taking antipsychotics, the 2 most common comorbidities were combined type attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (11.6%-17.8%) and anxiety disorder (13.1%-30.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: This study demonstrated considerable variability and transiency in the use of prescription medications by US clinicians to manage symptoms and comorbidities associated with ASD. These findings support the importance of early and ongoing surveillance of patients with ASD and co-occurring conditions and offer clinicians insight on the targeted therapies most commonly used to manage co-occurring conditions. Future research and policy efforts are critical to assess the extent to which pharmacological management of comorbidities affects quality of life and functioning in patients with ASD while continuing to optimize clinical guidelines, to ensure effective care for this growing population.

Napabucasin Drug-Drug Interaction Potential, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics Following Oral Dosing in Healthy Adult Volunteers.

Napabucasin is an orally administered reactive oxygen species generator that is bioactivated by the intracellular antioxidant nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate:quinone oxidoreductase 1. Napabucasin induces cell death in cancer cells, including cancer stem cells. This phase 1 study (NCT03411122) evaluated napabucasin drug-drug interaction potential for 7 cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and the breast cancer resistance protein transporter/organic anion transporter 3. Healthy volunteers who tolerated napabucasin during period 1 received probe drugs during period 2, and in period 3 received napabucasin (240 mg twice daily; days 1-11) plus a phenotyping cocktail containing omeprazole (CYP2C19), caffeine (CYP1A2), flurbiprofen (CYP2C9), bupropion (CYP2B6), dextromethorphan (CYP2D6), midazolam (CYP3A) (all oral; day 6), intravenous midazolam (day 7), repaglinide (CYP2C8; day 8), and rosuvastatin (breast cancer resistance protein/organic anion transporter 3; day 9). Drug-drug interaction potential was evaluated in 17 of 30 enrolled volunteers. Napabucasin coadministration increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval]) of caffeine (124% [109.0%-141.4%]), intravenous midazolam (118% [94.4%-147.3%]), repaglinide (127% [104.7%-153.3%]), and rosuvastatin (213% [42.5%-1068.3%]) and decreased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity of dextromethorphan (71% [47.1%-108.3%]), bupropion (79% [64.6%-97.0%]), and hydroxybupropion (45% [15.7%-129.6%]). No serious adverse events/deaths were reported. Generally, napabucasin is not expected to induce/inhibit drug clearance to a clinically meaningful degree.

The role of uptake and degradation in the regulation of peripheral serotonin dynamics in Gulf toadfish, Opsanus beta.

The neurotransmitter serotonin (5-hyroxytryptamine, 5-HT) is involved in a variety of peripheral processes. Arguably most notable is its role as a circulating vasoconstrictor in the plasma of vertebrates. Plasma 5-HT is maintained at constant levels under normal conditions through the processes of cellular uptake, degradation, and excretion, known collectively as clearance. However, the degree to which each individual component of clearance contributes to this whole animal response remains poorly understood. The goal of this experiment was to determine the extent to which transporter-mediated uptake and intracellular degradation contribute to 5-HT clearance in the model teleost Gulf toadfish (Opsanus beta). Fish that were treated with the 5-HT transport inhibitors fluoxetine, buproprion, and decynium-22 had 1.47-fold higher plasma 5-HT concentrations and a 40% decrease in clearance rate compared to control fish. In contrast, fish treated with the MAO inhibitor clorgyline had a 1.54-fold increase in plasma 5-HT with no change in clearance rate. The results show that transporter-mediated 5-HT uptake plays an important role in controlling circulating 5-HT and whole body 5-HT homeostasis.

Dose-Dependent Inhibition of CYP2D6 by Bupropion in Patients With Depression.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential dose-dependent CYP2D6 inhibition by bupropion (BUP) in patients with depression. METHODS: Patients combining BUP with venlafaxine were included from a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database at the Diakonhjemmet Hospital (Oslo, Norway). The O/N-desmethylvenlafaxine metabolic ratio measured in TDM samples was used as a biomarker for CYP2D6 phenotype and was compared between patients treated with BUP 150 mg/d and 300 mg/d or greater. In addition, reference groups of venlafaxine-treated patients genotyped as CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PMs, no CYP2D6 activity) and normal metabolizers (NMs, fully functional CYP2D6 activity) were included. FINDINGS: A total of 221 patients were included in the study. The median O/N-desmethylvenlafaxine metabolic ratio was significantly higher in patients treated with BUP 150 mg/d (n = 59) versus 300 mg/d or greater (n = 34, 1.77 vs 0.96, P < 0.001). In CYP2D6 NMs (n = 62) and PMs (n = 66), the median metabolic ratios were 40.55 and 0.48, respectively. For patients treated with BUP 150 mg/d, 11 (19%) of the 59 patients were phenoconverted to PMs, whereas this was the case for 17 (50%) of the 34 patients treated with BUP 300 mg/d or greater. CONCLUSIONS: Bupropion exhibits a clear dose-dependent CYP2D6 inhibitory effect during treatment of patients with depression. This finding is of clinical relevance when adjusting dosing of CYP2D6 substrates during comedication with BUP. Half of the patients treated with high-dose BUP are converted to CYP2D6 PM phenotype. Because of the variability in CYP2D6 inhibition, TDM of CYP2D6 substrates should be considered to provide individualized dose adjustments during comedication with BUP.

Clinical effects of intravenous bupropion misuse reported to a regional poison center.

Bupropion is an antidepressant medication with expanding indications including smoking cessation, weight loss, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, seasonal affective disorder, and amphetamine dependence. Despite its increasing popularity among providers, it has a well-known narrow therapeutic window which can lead to delayed onset of symptoms with extended-release formulations and devastating consequences in overdose. We have noticed some patients misusing bupropion via intravenous use and had difficulty guiding decisions regarding clinical monitoring in these patients. As this route entirely changes the kinetics of bupropion, this has caused concern within our group. We reviewed all the cases of intravenous bupropion use reported to a single poison center without any other coingestants. The majority (66.7%) of patients had moderate effects and one patient had a seizure. No deaths were reported. All patients were symptomatic by the time of initial call to the poison center if they had any reported symptoms due to bupropion. This case series describes the clinical effects reported, and the timing of these effects, after intravenous bupropion use.

Efficacy of dextromethorphan for the treatment of depression: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: The large percentage of adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) insufficiently responding and/or tolerating conventional monoamine-based antidepressants invites the need for mechanistically novel treatments. Convergent evidence implicates glutamatergic signaling as a potential therapeutic target in MDD. AREAS COVERED: The synthesis herein of preclinical and clinical studies indicates that dextromethorphan (DXM) is well tolerated and exhibits clinically significant antidepressant effects; DXM combined with bupropion has demonstrated replicated and relatively rapid onset efficacy in adults with MDD. DXM efficacy has been preliminarily reported in adults with bipolar depression. The combination of DXM and bupropion represents a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic synergy which may account for the rapidity of action in MDD. EXPERT OPINION: The combination of DXM and bupropion is a safe, well tolerated and efficacious treatment option in adults with MDD. Priority questions are whether DXM/bupropion is uniquely effective across discrete domains of psychopathology (e.g. anhedonia, reward processing, general cognitive systems) and/or whether it is able to significantly improve patient-reported outcomes (e.g. quality of life, psychosocial functioning). The availability of ketamine/esketamine and DXM/bupropion instantiates the relevance of glutamate as a treatment target in MDD. Studies in bipolar depression with DXM/bupropion are warranted as well as in MDD with suicidality.