Fludarabine-treosulfan versus fludarabine-melphalan or busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning in older AML or MDS patients - A clinical trial to registry data comparison.

A randomized study (acronym: MC-FludT.14/L Trial II) demonstrated that fludarabine plus treosulfan (30 g/m²) was an effective and well tolerated conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). To further evaluate this regimen, all 252 study patients aged 50 to 70 years were compared with similar patients, who underwent allo-HCT after fludarabine/melphalan (140 mg/m²) (FluMel) or busulfan (12.8 mg/kg)/cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) (BuCy) regimens and whose data was provided by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. In 1:1 propensity-score matched-paired analysis (PSA) of AML patients, there was no difference in 2-year-relapse-incidence after FluTreo compared with either FluMel (n = 110, p = 0.28) or BuCy (n = 78, p = 0.98). However, 2-year-non-relapse-mortality (NRM) was lower compared with FluMel (p = 0.019) and BuCy (p < 0.001). Consequently, 2-year-overall-survival (OS) after FluTreo was higher compared with FluMel (p = 0.04) and BuCy (p < 0.001). For MDS patients, no endpoint differences between FluTreo and FluMel (n = 30) were evident, whereas 2-year-OS after FluTreo was higher compared with BuCy (n = 25, p = 0.01) due to lower 2-year-NRM. Multivariate sensitivity analysis confirmed all significant results of PSA. Consequently, FluTreo (30 g/m²) seems to retain efficacy compared with FluMel and BuCy, but is better tolerated by older patients.

Finding a balance in reduced toxicity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for thalassemia: role of infused CD3+ cell count and immunosuppression.

We performed a retrospective analysis on 124 patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia who were registered in the German pediatric registry for stem cell transplantation. All patients underwent first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) between 2011 and 2020 and belonged mainly to Pesaro risk class 1-2. Four-year overall (OS) and thalassemia-free survival (TFS) were 94.5% ± 2.9% and 88.0% ± 3.4% after treosulfan-fludarabine-thiotepa- and 96.9% ± 3.1% (P = 0.763) and 96.9% ± 3.1% (P = 0.155) after busulfan-fludarabine-based conditioning. Mixed chimerism below 75% occurred predominantly in treosulfan-based regimens (27.5% versus 6.2%). OS and TFS did not differ significantly between matched sibling, other matched family and matched unrelated donor (UD) HSCTs (OS: 100.0%, 100.0%, 96.3% ± 3.6%; TFS: 96.5% ± 2.4%, 90.0% ± 9.5%, 88.9% ± 6.0%). However, mismatched UD-HSCTs performed less favorable (OS: 84.7% ± 7.3% (P = 0.029); TFS: 79.9% ± 7.4% (P = 0.082)). We generated a scoring system reflecting the risk to develop mixed chimerism in our cohort. The main risk-reducing factors were a high CD3+ cell count (≥6 × 107/kg) in the graft, busulfan-conditioning, pre-conditioning therapy and low-targeted ciclosporin A trough levels. Acute GvHD grade III-IV in treosulfan-based concepts predominantly occurred in patients with UD and reduced GvHD prophylaxis but not in the context of high CD3+ cell doses. Taken together, this information might be used to develop more risk-adapted HSCT regimens for thalassemia patients.

Long-Term Complications after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Treosulfan- or Busulfan-Based Conditioning in Pediatric Patients with Acute Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Results of an Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica Retrospective Study.

Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for hematologic malignancies during childhood have an increased risk of developing long-term sequelae that are in part attributable to the conditioning regimen. The present study aimed to assess the occurrence of long-term toxicities in a population of children who underwent HSCT for hematologic malignancies using either treosulfan or busulfan in the conditioning regimen. The cumulative incidences of growth impairment, altered gonadal function, altered thyroid function, cataracts, secondary malignant neoplasia, and altered pulmonary function were evaluated retrospectively by univariable and multivariable analyses in a population of 521 pediatric patients with acute leukemias or myelodysplastic syndromes treated in 20 Italian transplant centers affiliated with the Associazione Italiana Ematologia ed Oncologia Pediatrica (AIEOP). The median duration of follow-up for the entire study population was 7.1 years (range, 1 to 16 years). Overall, a larger proportion of patients given busulfan developed long-term toxicities compared to patients treated with treosulfan (34% versus 20%; P = .01). In univariable analysis, gonadal toxicity developed in 10% of patients who received treosulfan (95% confidence interval [CI], 3% to 15%), compared with 38% (95% CI, 24% to 39%) of busulfan-treated patients (P = .02), and this finding was confirmed by multivariable analysis (relative risk, .51; 95% CI, .34 to .76; P = .0009). We did not find any statistically significant associations between the occurrence of other long-term toxicities and the use of either busulfan or treosulfan. This study provides evidence that the use of treosulfan is correlated with a reduced incidence of gonadal toxicity in children undergoing HSCT for hematologic malignancies.

Low rate of nonrelapse mortality in under-4-year-olds with ALL given chemotherapeutic conditioning for HSCT: a phase 3 FORUM study.

ABSTRACT: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is highly effective for treating pediatric high-risk or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). For young children, total body irradiation (TBI) is associated with severe late sequelae. In the FORUM study (NCT01949129), we assessed safety, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) of 2 TBI-free conditioning regimens in children aged <4 years with ALL. Patients received fludarabine (Flu), thiotepa (Thio), and either busulfan (Bu) or treosulfan (Treo) before HSCT. From 2013 to 2021, 191 children received transplantation and were observed for ≥6 months (median follow-up: 3 years). The 3-year OS was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.52-0.72) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64-0.84) for Flu/Thio/Bu and Flu/Thio/Treo (P = .075), respectively. Three-year EFS was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.41-0.61) and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.39-0.62), respectively (P = .794). Cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and relapse at 3 years were 0.06 (95% CI, 0.02-0.12) vs 0.03 (95% CI: <0.01-0.09) (P = .406) and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.31-0.52) vs 0.45 (95% CI, 0.34-0.56) (P = .920), respectively. Grade >1 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 29% of patients receiving Flu/Thio/Bu and 17% of those receiving Flu/Thio/Treo (P = .049), whereas grade 3/4 occurred in 10% and 9%, respectively (P = .813). The 3-year incidence of chronic GVHD was 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03-0.13) vs 0.05 (95% CI, 0.02-0.11), respectively (P = .518). In conclusion, both chemotherapeutic conditioning regimens were well tolerated and NRM was low. However, relapse was the major cause of treatment failure. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01949129.

Treosulfan-based Reduced-intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adults With Primary Immunodeficiency: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We report three adult patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) treated with reduced-intensity allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with fludarabine/treosulfan conditioning and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis with alemtuzumab and a calcineurin inhibitor. CASE REPORT: Patient 1, a 51-year-old male, had common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) with protein-losing enteropathy. Patient 2 was a 29-year-old woman with STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3)-dependent hyper-IgE syndrome (HIES). Patient 3 was a 25-year-old male with XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis)-deficiency presenting as treatment-refractory granulomatous enteropathy. Engraftment occurred in all three patients, with 100% donor chimerism in blood. Two patients survived, whereas the patient with CVID died due to infection. CONCLUSION: This series highlights issues of transplantation for PID in adults and treosulfan-based conditioning, which is feasible for PID patients; infectious complications are the major issue of concern.

Busulfan and cyclophosphamide-based conditioning regimen still holds the promise of being a safe and efficacious regimen for allogeneic transplantation in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia, even in high risk.

Busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BuCy)-based regimen has been used as a standard myeloablative chemotherapy for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in thalassemia. However, treosulfan-based conditioning regimen has emerged due to concerns of toxicities. We retrospectively analysed the safety and efficacy of fludrabine/Bu/Cy/antithymocyte globulin (ATG) versus treosulfan/thiotepa/fludrabine regimens for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) in transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) conducted at our institute (2013-2021). In 75 patients, 36 (48%) received Flu/Bu/Cy/ATG whereas 39 (52%) received Treo/Thio/Flu. Median age was 6 (1-12) and 9 (1-15) years, respectively. Number of patients with Classes I, II, and III were 14, 10, and 12 in Flu/Bu/Cy/ATG versus 2, 19, and 18 in Treo/Thio/Flu group, respectively. Graft was growth factor mobilized bone marrow in Flu/Bu/Cy/ATG versus peripheral blood stem cell in Treo/Thio/Flu group. Mean stem cell dose was 3.82 (2.2-9.1) versus 5 (1.65-8.01) 106 /kg in Flu/Bu/Cy/ATG versus Treo/Thio/Flu group, respectively. Neutrophils and platelets engrafted at a median of 16 (14-21) and 16 (9-47) days in Flu/Bu/Cy/ATG and 15 (10-20) and 13 (9-41) days in Treo/Thio/Flu group. Median duration of follow-up was 28 (23-32.9) months. Five (6.6%) patients had rejection (all secondary). Venoocclusive disease was observed in 2 (5.7%) versus 4 (10.3%) patients (p = .047), respectively. Flu/Bu/Cy/ATG had 4 (11.4%) patients with acute GVHD versus 15 (38.5%) patients which had significant impact on survival (p = .038). We observed chronic GVHD in 4 (11.4%) and 11 (28.2%) patients, respectively, with significant impact on survival (p = .031). Four (5.1%) patients had TRM in Treo/Thio/Flu group, in contrast to none in Flu/Bu/Cy/ATG group. Mixed chimerism was common in Flu/Bu/Cy/ATG {20 (57.1%)} versus Treo/Thio/Flu group {12 (30.1%)}. Five-year Event Free Survival (EFS) and OS of entire cohort were 87% + 4% and 94% + 3%, respectively. Estimated TFS, EFS, OS of Flu/Bu/Cy/ATG versus Treo/Thio/Flu was 97.1% + 2.9% versus 89.2% + 5.1% (p = .251), 97 + 3% versus 80.7 + 6% (p = .041) and 100% versus 90.4 + 5% (p = .067), respectively. In our experience, Flu/Bu/Cy/ATG regimen is safe and effective even in high-risk TDT. However, one needs to be vigilant for mixed chimerism.

A retrospective study of treosulfan versus busulfan-based conditioning in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of treosulfan-based vs busulfan-based conditioning regimens in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients. METHODS: Retrospective study of all consecutive patients (2012-2019) treated with allogenic HSCT and treosulfan- or busulfan-based conditioning regimens at a single center. RESULTS: A total of 101 HSCT were included: 66 HSCT with busulfan and 35 with treosulfan. In malignant diseases (n = 62), busulfan-based conditioning was more commonly employed than treosulfan: 82.3% vs 17.7%. However, the use of treosulfan for malignant diseases increased over time: 6.5% of HSCT in 2012-2015 vs 29% of HSCT in 2015-2019 (p = .02). The cohort of treosulfan had more children under 1-year of age than the busulfan cohort (31 vs 13%; p = .033). The percentage of patients who received serotherapy was 73 and 89% in the nonmalignant and malignant groups, respectively. The engraftment, time to neutrophil, and platelet engraftment were not significantly different between the busulfan and the treosulfan cohorts. Rate of grade II-IV acute GvHD was significantly higher in the busulfan cohort than the treosulfan cohort (39% vs 15%; p = .016). No differences were observed in endothelial damage complications, chronic GvHD, relapse, overall survival, and transplant-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Busulfan-based conditioning regimens are used more frequently for children undergoing allogenic HSCT, but treosulfan-based conditioning is gaining acceptance. Treosulfan-based conditioning is associated with lower rates of acute GvHD, and no significant differences on overall survival were observed compared with busulfan.

Late endocrine effects after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with nonmalignant diseases.

The number of children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for nonmalignant diseases has increased in recent years. Endocrine complications are common after HSCT for malignant diseases, while little is known about long-term prevalence and risk factors in children transplanted for nonmalignant diseases. We retrospectively evaluated gonadal function, near adult height and thyroid function in 197 survivors of pediatric HSCT for hemoglobinopathies (n = 66), inborn errors of immunity/metabolism (n = 74) and bone marrow failure disorders (n = 57); median follow-up was 6.2 years (range 3.0-10.5). Gonadal dysfunction occurred in 55% of (post)pubertal females, was still present at last assessment in 43% and was more common after busulfan- than treosulfan-based conditioning (HR 10.6, CI 2.2-52.7; adjusted for HSCT indication). Gonadal dysfunction occurred in 39% of (post)pubertal males, was still present at last assessment in 32% and was less common in those who were prepubertal compared to (post)pubertal at HSCT (HR 0.11; CI 0.05-0.21). Near adult height was more than 2 SDS below mean parental height in 21% of males and 8% of females. Hypothyroidism occurred in 16% of patients; 4% received thyroxin treatment. In conclusion, endocrine complications, especially gonadal dysfunction, are common after pediatric HSCT for nonmalignant conditions. In females, treosulfan seems less gonadotoxic than busulfan. Careful long-term endocrine follow-up is indicated.

Endothelial Activation and Stress Index-Measured Pretransplantation Predicts Transplantation-Related Mortality in Patients with Thalassemia Major Undergoing Transplantation with Thiotepa, Treosulfan, and Fludarabine Conditioning.

The use of thiotepa-treosulfan-fludarabine conditioning regimen and peripheral blood stem cell grafts is associated with improved outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with high-risk thalassemia major. However, there remains a need to identify predictors of poor outcomes in this cohort to further optimize outcomes. The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) is a biomarker shown to predict survival in various settings, including graft-versus-host disease, veno-occlusive disease, and nonrelapse mortality following allogeneic HCT. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the role of EASIX-PreTx (measured before conditioning therapy) as a biomarker in predicting day +100 transplantation-related mortality (TRM+100) in 281 patients with thalassemia major who underwent HCT with a uniform conditioning regimen using thiotepa-treosulfan-fludarabine at our center between January 2012 and December 2019. The median patient age was 9 years (range, 1 to 25 years), and 109 (38.8%) were females. According to the Pesaro classification (with Vellore modification), 3 patients (1.1%) were class I, 34 (12.1%) were class II, 134 (47.7%) were class III low risk, and 110 (39.1%) were class III high risk. Stem cell donors were matched sibling (n = 218; 77.6%), matched related nonsibling (n = 23; 8.2%), or matched unrelated (n = 40; 14.2%). Five patients (1.8%) received a bone marrow graft, and the others received a peripheral blood stem cell graft. Thirty-eight patients (13.5%) had TRM+100. EASIX-PreTx was available for 184 patients (65.5%). The median EASIX-PreTx was significantly higher in patients with TRM+100 compared with those without TRM+100 (1.09 versus .75; P = .008). An EASIX-PreTx cutoff of .85 had 70.4% sensitivity and 62% specificity for predicting TRM+100. The TRM+100 for patients with EASIX-PreTx >.85 was significantly higher than those with EASIX <.85 (24.4% versus 7.5%; P = .003). In a uniform subgroup of class III patients undergoing allogeneic HCT (n = 156), EASIX-PreTx was an independent predictor of TRM+100.

Treosulfan plus fludarabine versus TEAM as conditioning treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) has been proven to be feasible and efficient in several types of malignancies before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Given its favorable reduced toxicity profile, we introduced Treo/Flu as conditioning before autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT) in patients with B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Treo/Flu in comparison to TEAM. Fifty-seven patients with NHL received auto-HSCT after conditioning with either Treo/Flu (n = 22) or TEAM (n = 35). All patients achieved sustained engraftment. PFS, EFS and OS were not significant in both groups. Of note is that patients in the Treo/Flu group were less dependent on thrombocyte transfusions (p = 0.0082), significantly older (in median 11 years, p < 0.0001) and suffered less frequently from infectious complications (p = 0.0105), mucositis and stomatitis (p < 0.0001). This study is the first to present efficacy, feasibility, and safety of conditioning with Treo/Flu preceding auto-HSCT in patients with NHL. Since it demonstrated a lack of significant difference in comparison to TEAM conditioning it might be a valuable alternative especially in elderly patients with B-cell NHL and comorbidities. Further evaluation by prospective clinical trials is warranted.

Comparison of fludarabine-melphalan and fludarabine-treosulfan as conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation-a registry study on behalf of the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party.

In recent years considerable variations in conditioning protocols for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) protocols have been introduced for higher efficacy, lower toxicity, and better outcomes. To overcome the limitations of the classical definition of reduced intensity and myeloablative conditioning, a transplantation conditioning intensity (TCI) score had been developed. In this study, we compared outcome after two frequently used single alkylator-based conditioning protocols from the intermediate TCI score category, fludarabine/melphalan 140 mg/m2 (FluMel) and fludarabine/treosulfan 42 g/m2 (FluTreo) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete remission (CR). This retrospective analysis from the registry of the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) database included 1427 adult patients (median age 58.2 years) receiving either Flu/Mel (n = 1005) or Flu/Treo (n = 422). Both groups showed similar 3-year overall survival (OS) (54% vs 51.2%, p value 0.49) for patients conditioned with FluMel and FluTreo, respectively. However, patients treated with FluMel showed a reduced 3-year relapse incidence (32.4% vs. 40.4%, p value < 0.001) and slightly increased non-relapse mortality (NRM) (25.7% vs. 20.2%, p value = 0.06) compared to patients treated with FluTreo. Our data may serve as a basis for further studies examining the role of additional agents/ intensifications in conditioning prior to allo-HCT.

Treosulfan compared with reduced-intensity busulfan improves allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes of older acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients: Final analysis of a prospective randomized trial.

The phase III study was designed to compare event-free survival (EFS) after treosulfan-based conditioning with a widely applied reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) busulfan regimen in older or comorbid patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). A previously reported confirmatory interim analysis of the randomized clinical study including 476 patients demonstrated statistically significant noninferiority for treosulfan with clinically meaningful improvement in EFS. Here, the final study results and pre-specified subgroup analyses of all 570 randomized patients with completed longer-term follow-up are presented. Patients presenting HCT-specific comorbidity index >2 or aged ≥50 years were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous (IV) fludarabine with either treosulfan (30 g/m2 IV) or busulfan (6.4 mg/kg IV) after stratification by disease risk group, donor type, and participating institution. The primary endpoint was EFS with disease recurrence, graft failure, or death from any cause as events. EFS of patients (median age 60 years) was superior after treosulfan compared to RIC busulfan: 36-months-EFS rate 59.5% (95% CI, 52.2-66.1) vs. 49.7% (95% CI, 43.3-55.7) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.49-0.84), p = 0.0006. Likewise, overall survival (OS) with treosulfan was superior compared to busulfan: 36-month-OS rate 66.8% vs. 56.3%; HR 0.64 (95% CI, 0.48-0.87), p = 0.0037. Post hoc analyses revealed that these differences were consistent with the confirmatory interim analysis, and thereby the treosulfan regimen appears particularly suitable for older AML and MDS patients.

Conditioning with fludarabine and treosulfan compared to FLAMSA-RIC in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myeloid malignancies: a retrospective single-center analysis.

Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and reduced toxicity conditioning (RTC) regimens enable allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) to more patients due to reduction in transplant-related mortality (TRM). The conditioning regimens with fludarabine and treosulfan (Flu/Treo) or fludarabine, amsacrine, cytarabine (FLAMSA)-RIC have shown their efficacy and tolerability in various malignancies. So far, no prospective study comparing the two regimens is available. Two studies compared the regimens retrospectively, in which both provided similar outcome. In this retrospective, single-center analysis, these two regimens were compared with regard to outcome, rate of acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GvHD), and engraftment. 113 consecutive patients with myeloid malignancies who received Flu/Treo or FLAMSA-RIC conditioning prior to alloSCT between 2007 and 2019 were included. Except for age, previous therapies, and remission status before alloSCT, patient characteristics were well balanced. The median follow-up time within this analysis was 44 months. There was no significant difference in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) or platelet engraftment between the two conditioning regimens. Overall survival (OS), the relapse-free survival (RFS), and the TRM were not significantly different between the two cohorts. The rate of GvHD did not differ between the two groups. In summary, this retrospective analysis shows that there is no major difference regarding tolerability and survival between the Flu/Treo and FLAMSA-RIC regimens. Despite several limitations due to uneven distribution concerning age and remission status, we demonstrate that Flu/Treo and FLAMSA-RIC provide similar outcomes and are feasible in older and intensively pre-treated patients.

High-Dose Treosulfan and Melphalan as Consolidation Therapy Versus Standard Therapy for High-Risk (Metastatic) Ewing Sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Ewing 2008R3 was conducted in 12 countries and evaluated the effect of treosulfan and melphalan high-dose chemotherapy (TreoMel-HDT) followed by reinfusion of autologous hematopoietic stem cells on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival in high-risk Ewing sarcoma (EWS). METHODS: Phase III, open-label, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Eligible patients had disseminated EWS with metastases to bone and/or other sites, excluding patients with only pulmonary metastases. Patients received six cycles of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide induction and eight cycles of vincristine, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide consolidation therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive additional TreoMel-HDT or no further treatment (control). The random assignment was stratified by number of bone metastases (1, 2-5, and > 5). The one-sided adaptive-inverse-normal-4-stage-design was changed after the first interim analysis via Müller-Schäfer method. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2018, 109 patients were randomly assigned, and 55 received TreoMel-HDT. With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, there was no significant difference in EFS between TreoMel-HDT and control in the adaptive design (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.32, intention-to-treat). Three-year EFS was 20.9% (95% CI, 11.5 to 37.9) in TreoMel-HDT and 19.2% (95% CI, 10.8 to 34.4) in control patients. The results were similar in the per-protocol collective. Males treated with TreoMel-HDT had better EFS compared with controls: median 1.0 years (95% CI, 0.8 to 2.2) versus 0.6 years (95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9); P = .035; HR 0.52 (0.28 to 0.97). Patients age < 14 years benefited from TreoMel-HDT with a 3-years EFS of 39.3% (95% CI, 20.4 to 75.8%) versus 9% (95% CI, 2.4 to 34); P = .016; HR 0.40 (0.19 to 0.87). These effects were similar in the per-protocol collective. This observation is supported by comparable results from the nonrandomized trial EE99R3. CONCLUSION: In patients with very high-risk EWS, additional TreoMel-HDT was of no benefit for the entire cohort of patients. TreoMel-HDT may be of benefit for children age < 14 years.

Busulfan-fludarabine- or treosulfan-fludarabine-based myeloablative conditioning for children with thalassemia major.

Significant advances in supportive care for patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia major (TDT) have improved patients' life expectancy. However, transfusion-associated iron overload remains a significant barrier to long-term survival with good quality of life. Today, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the current curative standard of care. Alongside selection of the best available donor, an optimized conditioning regimen is crucial to maximize outcomes for patients with TDT undergoing HSCT. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the role of busulfan-fludarabine-based and treosulfan-fludarabine-based conditioning in TDT patients undergoing HSCT. We included 772 patients registered in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) database who underwent first HSCT between 2010 and 2018. Four hundred ten patients received busulfan-fludarabine-based conditioning (median age 8.6 years) and 362 patients received treosulfan-fludarabine-based conditioning (median age 5.7 years). Patient outcomes were retrospectively compared by conditioning regimen. Two-year overall survival was 92.7% (95% confidence interval: 89.3-95.1%) after busulfan-fludarabine-based conditioning and 94.7% (95% confidence interval: 91.7-96.6%) after treosulfan-fludarabine-based conditioning. There was a very low incidence of second HSCT overall. The main causes of death were infections, graft-versus-host disease, and rejection. In conclusion, use of busulfan or treosulfan as the backbone of myeloablative conditioning for patients with TDT undergoing HSCT resulted in comparably high cure rates. Long-term follow-up studies are warranted to address the important issues of organ toxicities and gonadal function.

Evaluation of the drug-drug interaction potential of treosulfan using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling approach.

AIMS: The aim of this work is the development of a mechanistic physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model using in vitro to in vivo extrapolation to conduct a drug-drug interaction (DDI) assessment of treosulfan against two cytochrome p450 (CYP) isoenzymes and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrates. METHODS: A PBPK model for treosulfan was developed de novo based on literature and unpublished clinical data. The PBPK DDI analysis was conducted using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) DDI index drugs (probe substrates) midazolam, omeprazole and digoxin for CYP3A4, CYP2C19 and P-gp, respectively. Qualified and documented PBPK models of the probe substrates have been adopted from an open-source online model database. RESULTS: The PBPK model for treosulfan, based on both in vitro and in vivo data, was able to predict the plasma concentration-time profiles and exposure levels of treosulfan applied for a standard conditioning treatment. Medium and low potentials for DDI on CYP3A4 (maximum area under the concentration-time curve ratio (AUCRmax = 2.23) and CYP2C19 (AUCRmax = 1.6) were predicted, respectively, using probe substrates midazolam and omeprazole. Treosulfan was not predicted to cause a DDI on P-gp. CONCLUSION: Medicinal products with a narrow therapeutic index (eg, digoxin) that are substrates for CYP3A4, CYP2C19 or P-gp should not be given during treatment with treosulfan. However, considering the comprehensive treosulfan-based conditioning treatment schedule and the respective pharmacokinetic properties of the concomitantly used drugs (eg, half-life), the potential for interaction on all evaluated mechanisms would be low (AUCR < 1.25), if concomitantly administered drugs are dosed either 2 hours before or 8 hours after the 2-hour intravenous infusion of treosulfan.

Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms.

PURPOSE: Treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) were successfully introduced into toxicity-reduced conditioning for SCT. However, the risk of post-SCT relapse remains a matter of concern. We report the results of a novel individual treatment approach with Treo/Flu and cytarabine (Treo/Flu/AraC) conditioning prior to allogeneic SCT in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). METHODS: Seventy-seven patients (median age 54 years) at high risk of disease relapse due to unfavorable cytogenetics or failure to achieve complete remission prior to SCT were included. Median follow-up was 3.2 years. RESULTS: The 1-, 2- and 3-year RFS rates were 49.4%, 41.7%, and 37.6% and OS rates were 59.3%, 49.3%, and 45.4%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of NRM was 10% at 100 days, 18.8% at 1 year and 20.1% at 2 years. The cumulative incidence of relapse increased from 31% at 1 year to 38.5% after 3 years. The cumulative incidences of engraftment, chimerism, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and toxicities were acceptable and comparable with similar patients conditioned with Treo/Flu or FLAMSA-RIC. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, Treo/Flu/AraC provides tolerable, feasible, and effective conditioning for patients with AML, MDS or MPN, even in advanced disease states. The incidence of NRM and relapse is acceptable in this heavily pre-treated population with high-risk disease. Future research will aim to confirm these initial findings and include a larger number of participants in a prospective trial.

Impact of Treosulfan Exposure on Early and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Treosulfan-based conditioning has gained popularity in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) because of its presumed favorable efficacy and toxicity profile. Treosulfan is used in standardized dosing regimens based on body surface area. The relationships between systemic treosulfan exposure and early and long-term clinical outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT for nonmalignant diseases remain unclear. In this a multicenter, prospective observational study, we assessed the association between treosulfan exposure and early and, in particular, long-term clinical outcomes. Our study cohort comprised 110 pediatric patients with nonmalignant diseases who underwent HSCT between 2011 and 2019 in Leiden, The Netherlands and Rome, Italy. Blood samples were collected, and treosulfan area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC0-∞) was estimated as a measure of exposure. Cox proportional hazard survival analyses were performed to assess the relationships between treosulfan exposure and overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). The predictive value of systemic treosulfan exposure for the occurrence of toxicity within 28 days was evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. In the overall cohort, OS and EFS at 2 years were 89.0% and 75.3%, respectively, with an excellent OS of 97% in children age <2 years. The occurrence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease, the level of 1-year whole blood chimerism, and 2-year OS and EFS were not correlated with treosulfan exposure. The occurrence of skin toxicity (odds ratio [OR], 3.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-13.68; P = .02) and all-grade mucositis (OR, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.43-15.50; P = .02), but not grade ≥2 mucositis (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.52 to 4.58; P = .46) was related to high treosulfan exposure (>1750 mg*h/L). Our study demonstrates that standardized treosulfan-based conditioning results in a favorable OS and EFS in infants and children with nonmalignant diseases, independent of interindividual variation in treosulfan exposure. These outcomes can be achieved without the need for therapeutic drug monitoring, thereby emphasizing the advantage of treosulfan use in this category of patients. Although higher treosulfan exposure increases the risk of skin toxicity, there is no absolute necessity for therapeutic drug monitoring if proper preventive skin measures are taken. More research is needed to assess whether deescalation of treosulfan doses is possible to minimize early and long-term toxicity without compromising efficacy.