Association of urine oncofetal fibronectin levels with urology's most common disorders.

UNLABELLED: Urine oncofetal fibronectin (OnfFN) has proven useful in the assessment of malignant diseases such as transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder. This study aimed to explore whether OnfFN may identify benign and common urinary diseases. METHODS: The urine OnfFN concentrations from patients who had bladder TCC (8 patients), benign urinary diseases (10 benign prostatic enlargement [BPE] patients, 10 urolithiasis patients), or controls (10 healthy individuals) were determined by ELISA and compared. RESULTS: The urine OnfFN concentration was significantly higher in patients with bladder TCC and lithiasis (mean ± SE 0.43 ± 0.18 and 0.45 ± 0.23 ug/mL) than in patients with BPE and in healthy individuals (0.15 ± 0.06 and 0.10 ± 0.02 ug/mL, p<0.05). The urine OnfFN level (cutoff value 0.038 µg/mL), was able to identify 75% of patients with bladder TCC, 60% of patients with BPE and 80% of patients with urolithiasis, achieving a sensitivity of 0.75 for the recognition of either cancer or a urinary disorder. The OnfFN level had a high sensitivity (0.9) for the identification of urolithiasis. CONCLUSION: The urine OnfFN level proved helpful in the identification of bladder TCC patients. However, it had a better performance for the identification of urolithiasis, highlighting the potential usefulness of OnfFN as a biomarker for urothelial inflammation and repair.

Patients with a negative cystoscopy and negative Nmp22® Bladderchek® test are at low risk of missed transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a prospective evaluation

OBJECTIVES: Urine based tumor markers have uncertain utility in diagnosis or surveillance of patients with bladder cancer while cytology is commonly used. We evaluated whether cytology provides additional diagnostic information in patients with a negative NMP22® BladderChek® test (BladderChek) and negative cystoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed subset analyses of 2 large prospective multi-center databases evaluating BladderChek for UCB detection and surveillance. These cohorts were analyzed for presence of cancer and result of urine cytology in setting of a negative cystoscopy and negative BladderChek. Subsequently, we prospectively performed cystoscopy, cytology and BladderChek on 434 patients at our institution being evaluated for UCB. RESULTS: In the detection database (n = 1331), 1065 patients had a negative cystoscopy and BladderChek. There were 3 cancers (stages Ta, Tis and T1) and cytology was atypical in one and reactive in two. In the surveillance cohort (n = 668) patients, 437 patients had negative cystoscopy and BladderChek. Cancer was found in 2 patients (stages Tis and Ta). The patient with Tis has dysplastic cytology and Ta tumor had reactive cytology. In our cohort of 434 patients, 288 pts had negative cystoscopy and BladderChek. One cancer was missed, a Ta ureteral urothelial carcinoma with a reactive cytology. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with negative cystoscopy and BladderChek, very few cancers are missed and cytology was not effective in detection. Use of a point-of-care test in conjunction with cystoscopy in lieu of cytology could decrease cost, provide immediate results, improve negative predictive value and reduce the uncertainty that results from inconclusive cytologic results.

Testing for urinary hyaluronate improves detection and grading of transitional cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to establish a method for the diagnosis and grading of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), which is responsible for 90% of bladder tumors, using a recently developed ultrasensitive assay for the measurement of hyaluronan (HA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urine samples were collected prior to surgery (cystoscopy, transurethral resection for bladder cancer (TURBT), and cystectomy) in 350 patients. After the procedure, pathologic examination revealed that 160 patients had TCC. HA was measured directly in the urine by a noncompetitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-like fluorometric assay. Using the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC), t-test, Dunn test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney test, we evaluated the differences between groups (those with TCC vs. those without TCC). RESULTS: By analyzing the ROC curve, we chose a urinary HA cutoff value of 13.0 µg/l for indicating risk of TCC. Using the value this of 13.0 µg/l, we found that this test had an overall sensitivity of 82.3% and an overall specificity of 81.2%. The positive predictive value of this assay was 78.9%, the negative predictive negative value was 84.2%, and the predictive accuracy was 81.7%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that every 1 µg/l increase in HA increased a patient's likelihood of having TCC by 3.9%. The sensitivity of this test to detect superficial tumors was 76.6%, whereas its sensitivity for detecting invasive tumors was 94.6%. The urinary HA excretion of patients with TCC, classified according to the TNM staging system and the World Health Organization (WHO) grading system, were compared, and a significant difference was observed between the HA levels of patients with superficial tumors compared with invasive tumors (P = 0.005) as well as between patients with low- vs. high-grade carcinomas (P < 0.001). Patients with urinary HA levels >35 µg/l had a 4.63 times increased risk of having an aggressive, invasive, high grade tumor (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the postulate that urinary HA may be used as a tumor marker to aid in the diagnosis and grading of TCC. Additionally, more invasive tumors produce and release more HA in urine than superficial tumors, thus higher HA levels indicate more aggressive disease.

Patients with a negative cystoscopy and negative Nmp22® Bladderchek® test are at low risk of missed transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a prospective evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: Urine based tumor markers have uncertain utility in diagnosis or surveillance of patients with bladder cancer while cytology is commonly used. We evaluated whether cytology provides additional diagnostic information in patients with a negative NMP22® BladderChek® test (BladderChek) and negative cystoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed subset analyses of 2 large prospective multi-center databases evaluating BladderChek for UCB detection and surveillance. These cohorts were analyzed for presence of cancer and result of urine cytology in setting of a negative cystoscopy and negative BladderChek. Subsequently, we prospectively performed cystoscopy, cytology and BladderChek on 434 patients at our institution being evaluated for UCB. RESULTS: In the detection database (n = 1331), 1065 patients had a negative cystoscopy and BladderChek. There were 3 cancers (stages Ta, Tis and T1) and cytology was atypical in one and reactive in two. In the surveillance cohort (n = 668) patients, 437 patients had negative cystoscopy and BladderChek. Cancer was found in 2 patients (stages Tis and Ta). The patient with Tis has dysplastic cytology and Ta tumor had reactive cytology. In our cohort of 434 patients, 288 pts had negative cystoscopy and BladderChek. One cancer was missed, a Ta ureteral urothelial carcinoma with a reactive cytology. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with negative cystoscopy and BladderChek, very few cancers are missed and cytology was not effective in detection. Use of a point-of-care test in conjunction with cystoscopy in lieu of cytology could decrease cost, provide immediate results, improve negative predictive value and reduce the uncertainty that results from inconclusive cytologic results.

Detection of survivin mRNA in urine of patients with superficial urothelial cell carcinomas.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to assess if the presence of survivin mRNA in exfoliated cells present in urine samples can be a reliable marker of the presence of bladder tumour and recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urine samples from 30 patients with superficial urothelial cell carcinomas (UCC) were collected prior to transurethral resection (TUR) of the tumour and in the first routine follow-up, three months after TUR. Detection of survivin mRNA was performed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS: No correlation was observed between survivin detection and the clinicopathological variables analysed, nevertheless, when patients were grouped into low-grade (G1) and high-grade (G2+G3) tumours, statistically significant differences were found between both groups (p=0.04). When we analysed the results of survivin detection and urinary cytology together, we observed that informative cases rose from 27.8% to 44.4%. Also, Kaplan-Meier curves for patients with negative cytology in the first followup, categorised according to survivin detection, revealed that survivin mRNA positive cases recurred earlier than negative ones. CONCLUSIONS: From our results we can conclude that detection of survivin expression can be a reliable tumour marker, but more studies are needed to clarify the potential of survivin to predict recurrences. These results showed that survivin detection in combination with conventional urinary cytology can be a useful tool to increase the sensitivity in detecting the presence of a recurrence after TUR.

Urinary hyaluronan as a marker for the presence of residual transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report is to evaluate the value of urinary hyaluronan (HA) as a maker of residual transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Urine samples were collected from 83 patients hospitalized for transurethral resection (TUR). Patient ages ranged from 36 to 86 years. Samples were taken both before and after surgery. HA analysis was performed using an "ELISA-like" fluorometric assay. RESULTS: Patients were divided into two groups: a control group whose previous diagnosis was negative for tumors (n=22) and another with positive diagnosis for tumors (n=61) which was further sub-divided into with and without residual tumor. After the second procedure 47 individuals did not display residual tumor, whereas 14 (23%) did. The average HA in the control group was 8.3 microg/L pre- and 7.1 post-operatively, hence, no change occurred (p=0.471). In the group with TCC patients, the HA dropped from 885.5 microg/L to 215.3 microg/L with residual tumors and from 234.3 microg/L to 11.2 microg/L for those without residual tumor. Using a cut-off value of 20 microg/L, the sensitivity to detect residual tumor is 92.9% and specificity is 83%. CONCLUSION: HA in addition to being one of the best markers for the initial evaluation of bladder carcinoma can be used to determine the presence of a residual tumor. This is associated with poor prognosis.

Nitric oxide in patients with transitional bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: One of the current challenges in clinical oncology is the identification of patients with superficial transitional bladder carcinoma (TBC) at high risk of recurrence or myoinvasive disease. Recently, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression was detected in urinary bladder cancers. Because iNOS produces a high concentration of nitric oxide (NO), we thought it possible that urine from TBC patients produces high levels of NO. The aim of this study was to determine urine NO levels in TBC compared with healthy controls and with patients bearing other nonrelated tumors, as well as to examine iNOS expression in bladder cancer tissue. METHODS: This study evaluated patients with TBC (n = 33), with gynecological tumors (GT) (n = 19), TBC patients with no evidence of tumor (no evidence of disease [NED]) (n = 19), and healthy subjects (n = 39). Urine NO levels were determined by Griess reagent, expressed as microM NO(2) (-)/100 mg creatinine. RESULTS: TBC patients produced significantly higher urine NO median values (4.2 microM; range, 2.1-91.6) than were produced by healthy individuals (2.1 microM; range, 0.4-4.9), by the NED group (1.7 microM; range 1.2-5.4), and by GT patients (2.0 microM; range, 0.8-58.1) (P = 0.000, Kruskal-Wallis test). iNOS was detected by Western blot in 52% (13/25) of bladder tumors examined. CONCLUSIONS: Although a wider study is necessary, our results suggest that the enhanced NO levels could perhaps be considered as a putative marker in TBC patients.

Cathepsin B levels in urine from bladder cancer patients.

There is accumulating evidence that cysteine proteinase activity plays an important role in cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Previously we demonstrated that cathepsin B (CB) plasma activity is increased in patients with transitional bladder cancer (TCC). In this work we have attempted to determine whether urine CB protein levels could be used as tumor marker in bladder cancer patients. Urine CB levels were evaluated employing a dot blot method, in 30 patients with TCC, 21 patients successfully treated from TCC without evidence of disease at the moment of urine collection (NED) and in 30 healthy volunteers. The median value (Md) of the control group was 3.8 microg CB/ml. Significantly higher urine CB values (Md: 5.9 microg/ml) were found in the TCC group. A high CB value was also found in the NED group (5.0 microg/ml). Urine CB values over the 5.2 microg/ml (cut-off point) were observed in 63% of TCC patients, 48% of NED and 8% of the control group. Only 4% NED patients had CB values over 13.0 microg/ml while 33% of TCC patients surpassed this value. Thus, urine CB might be a potential marker for transitional bladder cancer diagnosis.