Ceftazidime/avibactam serum concentration in patients on ECMO.

OBJECTIVES: The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may alter blood levels of several drugs, including antibiotics, leading to under dosing of these drugs and thus to potential treatment failure. No data exist on pharmacokinetics of new antimicrobial, in particular ceftazidime/avibactam. We therefore perform this study to evaluate ceftazidime/avibactam blood levels in ECMO patients and find factors associated with underdosing. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of patients on ECMO having received ceftazidime/avibactam and in whom trough blood levels of ceftazidime and avibactam were available. Main outcome measurement was the number of patients with ceftazidime and avibactam blood levels above predefined cut-off values, derived from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, namely 8 mg/L for ceftazidime and 4 mg/L for avibactam, and explored factors associated with underdosing. RESULTS: Twenty-three ceftazidime/avibactam trough levels were available in 14 ECMO patients, all of them having received veno-venous ECMO for SARS-CoV-2-associated pneumonia. Although ceftazidime levels were above 8 mg/L in all except one patient, nine (39%) of the avibactam dosages were below 4 mg/L. Increased renal clearance (creatinine clearance > 130 mL/min) was the main factor associated with under dosing, since 7 out of the 10 dosages below the predefined cut-offs were measured in patients with this condition. CONCLUSIONS: In ECMO patients receiving ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftazidime and avibactam serum levels are above EUCAST breakpoints in most cases, justifying the use of normal dosing in ECMO patients. Increased renal clearance may lead to ceftazidime and avibactam under dosing.

Subcutaneous administration of ceftazidime at 20 and 40 mg/kg produces theoretically therapeutic plasma concentrations for at least 120 hours in red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of SC ceftazidime administered at 20 and 40 mg/kg to red-eared sliders. ANIMALS: 8 adult red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans). METHODS: In a sequential, 2-period study with a 3-week washout period between treatments, ceftazidime was administered SC to turtles at 20 and 40 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected from the subcarapacial sinus at 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours after ceftazidime administration. Plasma ceftazidime concentrations were quantified using reversed-phase HPLC. RESULTS: Mean plasma half-life after 20- and 40-mg/kg dosing was 39.75 ± 8.0 hours and 33.03 ± 6.56 hours, respectively. Mean maximum plasma concentration after 20- and 40-mg/kg dosing was 71.0 ± 15.93 µg/mL and 120.0 ± 30.62 µg/mL, respectively. Mean plasma ceftazidime concentrations remained ≥ 8 µg/mL, the theoretical MIC for various reptile pathogens for all time points. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicate that ceftazidime dosed at either 20 or 40 mg/kg produces plasma concentrations exceeding the theoretical MIC of various reptile pathogens for at least 120 hours. An ideal dosing interval could not be determined, as all plasma concentrations remained above the threshold of interest for all time points. Follow-up studies should focus on establishing a dosing interval and more rigorous monitoring for potential adverse effects.

Citrobacter koseri. Una endoftalmitis exógena inusual / Citrobacter koseri, an unusual exogenous endoftalmitis

Citrobacter koseri es un bacilo gramnegativo que causa endoftalmitis de forma muy infrecuente y agresiva, asociando mal pronóstico visual. Solo el 6% de las endoftalmitis son por gramnegativos y nuestro germen representa un pequeño porcentaje. Presentamos un varón de 65 años que trabaja en un laboratorio de animales. Acude a urgencias por pérdida de visión del ojo izquierdo debido a una hemorragia vítrea y desprendimiento de retina. Se practica una vitrectomía y 3 días después, desarrolla una endoftalmitis. Se realiza tratamiento intravítreo con inyecciones de vancomicina y ceftazidima así como tratamiento antibiótico tópico. Veinticuatro horas después, regresa con perforación corneal y una extrusión del cristalino. Ante la gravedad del cuadro se realiza una evisceración. El cultivo de las muestras confirman el microorganismo. Suponemos que la puerta de entrada del germen fueron las esclerotomías por el material de sutura expuesto, tras la manipulación de heces de roedores.(AU)

Citrobacter koseri is a bacillus that causes infrequent endophthalmitis. Six percent of cultures in endophthalmitis are Gram -, and as in these, Citrobacter koseri is associated with a poor visual prognosis. We present a 65-year-old man who works in an animal laboratory. He went to emergencies with loss of vision in his left eye due to a vitreous hemorrhage. A vitrectomy was performed and 3 days later, endophthalmitis was diagnosed. Vancomycin and ceftazidime were applied in eye drops and in two intravitreal injections. Twenty-four hours later he returned with a lens extrusion. Due to the severity of the condition, an evisceration was performed. Subsequently, the samples confirm the microorganism. We assume that the entry point for the bacterium was the sclerotomies through the exposed suture material, after handling rodent feces.(AU)

Eficacia y seguridad de ceftazidima-avibactam en pacientes pediátricos de 3 meses a más con sepsis causada por bacterias Gram-negativas productoras de carbapenemasas y resistentes a colistina / Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in pediatric patients aged 3 months and older with sepsis caused by Gram-negative carbapenemase-producing bacteria resistant to colistin

ANTECEDENTES: En el marco de la metodología ad hoc para evaluar solicitudes de tecnologías sanitarias, aprobada mediante Resolución de Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación N° 111-IETSI-ESSALUD-2021 y ampliada mediante Resolución de Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación N° 97-IETSI-ESSALUD2022, se ha elaborado el presente dictamen, el cual expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de ceftazidima-avibactam en pacientes pediátricos de 3 meses a más con sepsis causada por bacterias Gram-negativas productoras de carbapenemasas y resistentes a colistina. Así, el Dr. Michael Algio Quispe Huarcaya y la Dra. Mabel Rubi Carhuana Salazar, médicos especialistas en gastroenterología pediátrica del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins (HNERM), siguiendo la Directiva N° 003-IETSIESSALUD-2016, enviaron al Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación ­ IETSI las solicitudes de autorización de uso del producto farmacéutico ceftazidima-avibactam no incluido en el Petitorio Farmacológico de EsSalud. ASPECTOS GENERALES: La sepsis se define como una disfunción orgánica potencialmente mortal causada por una respuesta desregulada del huésped a la infección (Pomerantz y Weiss 2022). Se caracteriza por un síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica (SRIS) en respuesta a una infección, que en pacientes pediátricos consiste en: i) temperatura anormal' y/o recuento anormal de leucocitos, más ii) el ritmo cardiaco anormal2y/o frecuencia respiratoria anormalmente alta' (DynaMed 2022). La sepsis no tratada tempranamente, puede ocasionar daño irreversible a los tejidos, shock séptico, insuficiencia orgánica múltiple y poner en riesgo la vida (OPS 2022). Se estima que la mortalidad hospitalaria en pacientes pediátricos con sepsis es 2 % al 10 %, mientras que en pacientes pediátricos cuya sepsis se complica a sepsis grave (sepsis con disfunción de órganos diana) o shock séptico (sepsis con disfunción cardiovascular), la mortalidad es de 14 % al 50 % (DynaMed 2022; Weiss et al. 2020). METODOLOGÍA Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica exhaustiva con el objetivo de identificar la mejor evidencia disponible sobre la eficacia y seguridad de C-A, en comparación con la mejor terapia de soporte, en pacientes pediátricos de 3 meses a más con sepsis causada por bacterias Gram-negativas productoras de carbapenemasas y resistentes a colistina (población objetivo). La búsqueda bibliográfica se llevó a cabo en las bases de datos: PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science y LILACS. Asimismo, se realizó una búsqueda manual dentro de las páginas web pertenecientes a grupos que realizan evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS) y guías de práctica clínica (GPC) incluyendo el National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), la Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), el Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), el Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), el Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Healthcare (IQWiG por sus siglas en alemán), la International Database of GRADE Guideline, el Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológica en Salud (CENETEC), la Guidelines International Network (GIN), el National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), la Cancer Guidelines Database, el New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG), el Instituto de Evaluación Tecnológica en Salud (IETS), el Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), la Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA), la Organización Mundial de la Salud y el Ministerio de Salud del Perú (MINSA). Además, se realizó una búsqueda de GPC de las principales sociedades o instituciones especializadas en infectología, tales como: la European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), la European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), la Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) y la Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Finalmente, se realizó una búsqueda en la página web de registro de ensayos clínicos (EC) www.clinicaltrials.gov, para identificar EC en curso o que no hayan sido publicados aún. RESULTADOS: Luego de la búsqueda bibliográfica hasta noviembre de 2022, se identificaron dos GPC elaboradas por la IDSA (Tamma et al. 2022) y la ESCMID (Paul et al. 2022), una ETS elaborada por NICE (NICE 2022) y un estudio observacional publicado por Wang et al. (Wang et al. 2022). Cabe mencionar que se excluyeron un ECA (Bradley et al. 2019) y dos GPC (Weiss et al. 2020; NICE 2017). Este ECA fue excluido porque evaluó pacientes pediátricos con infección urinaria complicada donde no se describe si los pacientes presentaron o no sepsis. Además, no se especifica si dichas infecciones fueron o no por bacterias productoras de carbapenemasas o al menos si fueron o no resistentes a carbapenémicos; por lo tanto, no brinda información que permita responder a la pregunta PICO del presente dictamen. Respecto a las GPC, estas dos guías (Weiss et al. 2020; NICE 2017) fueron excluidas porque sus recomendaciones no están dirigidas a la población objetivo del presente dictamen (pacientes con sepsis por bacterias gram-negativas productoras de carbapenemasas). CONCLUSIÓN: Por lo expuesto, el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación aprueba el uso de ceftazidima-avibactam para pacientes pediátricos de 3 meses a más con sepsis causada por bacterias Gram-negativas productoras de carbapenemasas y resistentes a colistina, como producto farmacéutico no incluido en el Petitorio Farmacológico de EsSalud, según lo establecido en el Anexo N° 1. La vigencia del presente dictamen preliminar es de un año a partir de la fecha de publicación. Así, la continuación de dicha aprobación estará sujeta a la evaluación de los resultados obtenidos y de mayor evidencia que pueda surgir en el tiempo.

Impacto da unitarização de ceftazidima + avibactam em um hospital público universitário durante a pandemia de COVID-19 / Impact of ceftazidime + avibactam unitarization in a university public hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introdução: A pandemia de COVID-19 fez aumentar a demanda de medicamentos utilizados em hospitais, como a Ceftazidima + Avibactam. Nesse contexto, a Central de Misturas Intravenosas (CMIV) de um hospital público universitário passou a unitarizar as doses prescritas. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o impacto da unitarização no consumo deste antibacteriano de alto custo em um hospital público universitário. Métodos: Trata-se de uma análise farmacoeconômica de custos diretos, sobre a utilização de frascos-ampola de Ceftazidima + Avibactam no período de 01/07/2020 a 31/05/2021. Foram unitarizadas todas as doses que correspondiam a uma fração da dose total do frasco-ampola, em Cabine de Segurança Biológica classe II B2. Os frascos-ampola foram utilizados à exaustão, através do compartilhamento e organização dos horários de manipulação. Resultados: O número total de preparos realizados pela CMIV do referido hospital no período foi de 837. O consumo projetado sem a centralização dos preparos seria de 837 (um frasco por dose). Entretanto, o consumo real foi de 437 frascos. A eficiência de unitarização foi de 101%, com economia real de 400 frascos (R$ 244.832,00) para a instituição. Conclusão: A pandemia de COVID-19 sobrecarregou os sistemas de saúde do mundo todo, sendo que a atuação farmacêutica foi fundamental para garantir o acesso aos medicamentos essenciais. A CMIV assumiu a unitarização da Ceftazidima + Avibactam, antibiótico em risco de desabastecimento, gerando um consumo 47,8% menor, contribuindo para o acesso deste medicamento de forma ininterrupta durante os 11 meses avaliados na referida instituição.

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic has increased the demand for drugs used in hospitals, such as Ceftazidime + Avibactam. In this context, the Central of Intravenous Admixtures (CMIV) of a public university hospital started to unitarize the prescribed doses. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of unitarization on the consumption of this high-cost antibacterial in a public university hospital. Methods: This is a pharmacoeconomic analysis of direct costs, on the Ceftazidime + Avibactam vials use, in the period from 07/01/2020 to 05/31/2021. All doses that corresponded to a fraction of the entire vial were unitarized in a Class II B2 Biological Safety Cabin. The vials were used to exhaustion, by sharing them, and organizing the manipulation schedules. Results: The total number of preparations made by the CMIV of that hospital in the period was 837 doses. The projected consumption would be 837 vials (one vial per dose). However, the actual consumption was 437 vials. The unitarization efficiency was of 101%, with real savings of 400 vials (R$ 244,832.00) for the institution. Conclusion: COVID-19 pandemic has overburdened health systems around the world, and pharmaceutical actions have been fundamental to guaranteeing access to essential medicines. CMIV took over the unitarization of Ceftazidime + Avibactam, an antibiotic at risk of shortages, leading to a 47.8% lower consumption, contributing to uninterrupted access to this drug during the 11 months evaluated at that institution.

In Vitro Activity of Various Sulbactam Compounds and Piperacillin/Tazobactam against Clinical Isolates of Different Gram-Negative Bacteria.

To provide direction for clinical application and pharmaceutical exploitation, the in vitro activity of sulbactam compounds and PIP/TAZ 8 : 1 against clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB, n = 976) was evaluated according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2019. By minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), the resistance rate of all GNB to AMP/SBT 2 : 1 (56.9-100%) was significantly higher than other drugs, except the resistance rate of Acinetobacter baumannii (Aba, n = 204) to piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ 8 : 1, 78.4%) which was close to it (76.5%). Additionally, the resistance rate of Aba to other compounds except AMP/SBT 2 : 1 differed greatly, but that of Klebsiella pneumonia (Kpn, n = 205) varied rarely. In addition, Escherichia coli (Eco, n = 204) and Kpn demonstrated low and high resistance rates, respectively. Compared with cefoperazone/sulbactam (CPZ/SBT 2 : 1), PIP/TAZ 8 : 1 had advantage in anti-Eco (RR = 0.5and OR = 2.17) and anti-Kpn activity (RR = 0.88and OR = 1.27), while its activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae: n = 194, RR = 0.91, and OR = 1.12), Aba (RR = 1.31 and OR = 0.41), and other Enterobacteriaceae (other Ebc: n = 169, RR = 1.40, and OR = 0.62) was not better than CPZ/SBT 2 : 1. Although it had advantage against Eco (RR = 0.60 and OR = 1.78), Pae (RR = 0.67 and OR = 1.63), and Aba (RR = 0.70 and OR = 2.05), the inhibition effect of piperacillin/sulbactam (PIP/SBT 2 : 1) against Kpn (RR = 0.94 and OR = 1.12) and other Ebc was just similar with CPZ/SBT 2 : 1 (RR = 0.93 and OR = 1.10). Furthermore, the anti-Eco (RR = 0.70 and OR = 1.50), anti-Kpn (RR = 0.89 and OR = 1.24), and anti-Pae (RR = 0.74 and OR = 1.46) activities of ceftazidime/sulbactam (CAZ/SBT 1 : 1) had a weak advantage, while its activity against Aba (RR = 0.94 and OR = 1.15) and other Ebc (RR = 0.79 and OR = 1.36) was just close to CPZ/SBT 2 : 1. Moreover, the inhibitory effect of PIP/SBT 1 : 1 against all tested clinical species was more active than CPZ/SBT 2 : 1, while that of CAZ/SBT 2 : 1 against all species of bacteria analyzed was weaker than the controls.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling to evaluate the efficacy of various dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with pneumonia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae: a multicentre study in northern China.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) in patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) pulmonary infections. METHODS: A total of 70 KPC-Kp strains were isolated from sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage samples of patients with pulmonary infections in three hospitals in northern China from April 2015 to October 2015. Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) was performed using population pharmacokinetic parameters of CZA combined with the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions gained from antimicrobial susceptibility testing to predict the efficacy of different dosing regimens. Various CZA dosing regimens were modelled using MCS. RESULTS: The in vitro study showed potent activity of CZA against KPC-Kp strains with MIC50/90 values of 1/2 mg/L, with a susceptibility rate of 95.7%. The values of cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for bactericidal (50%fT>5 × MIC) target were as follows: for patients with creatinine clearance (CLCr) >51 mL/min, the CFR was 96.01% for 2.5 g CZA every 12 h (q12h) and 97.14% for 2.5 g CZA every 8 h (q8h); and for patients with moderate renal impairment (CLCr >30 to ≤50 mL/min), the CFR was 95.75% for 1.25 g CZA q12h and 97.09% for 1.25 g CZA q8h. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that the recommended dose of CZA can provide adequate pharmacodynamic exposure for treating KPC-Kp pneumonia.

Evaluation of Ceftazidime/Avibactam Administration in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections by Monte Carlo Simulation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the administration regimen of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) for bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CZA against Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa isolated from blood cultures at member hospitals in BRICS (Blood Bacterial Resistant Investigation Collaborative System) in 2019 were determined by broth micro-dilution methodology. A 10,000-patient Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) was used to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for different CZA dosage regimens to evaluate their efficacies and optimize the best initial dosage regimen. RESULTS: Altogether, 6487 Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa strains were isolated from the blood cultures. The overall CZA resistance rate was 2.31%, of which the Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa rates were 1.57% and 14.29%, respectively. The MCS showed that the greater the MIC value, the worse the therapeutic effect. When the CZA MIC was ≤8 mg/L, the standard dose (2.5g iv q8h) achieved 90% PTA in the subset of patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) values from 51 to 120 mL/min. Although the high-dose regimen (3.75g iv q8h) achieved 90% PTA in patients with CrCl values from 121 to 190 mL/min, implementing the low-dose regimen (1.25g iv q8h) was also effective for patients in the 51-89 mL/min CrCl range. Generally, the high-dose regimen (3.75g iv q8h) reached 90% CFR against all of the strains. Conversely, in patients with CrCl values of 121-190 mL/min, the standard dose (2.5g iv q8h) failed to reach 90% CFR against some Enterobacteriaceae members and P. aeruginosa. When the dose was reduced to the low-dose regimen (1.25g iv q8h), no patients reached 90% CFR against some Enterobacteriaceae members and P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSION: CZA has good antibacterial activity against Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa in bloodstream infections. Clinicians could make individualized treatment regimens in accordance with the sensitivity of the strains and the level of renal function in their patients to best predict the drug-related clinical responses.

The Potential Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Against Carbapenem Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates Harboring Different Carbapenemase Types in a Thai University Hospital.

PURPOSE: MBL and OXA-48 genes in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) have emerged as a major public health problem worldwide, including Thailand. Due to the lack of susceptibility data and dosing regimens of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) against CRE in Thailand, especially in colistin-resistant era, we aimed to demonstrate in vitro susceptibility data of CZA and optimal dose based on Monte Carlo simulation of CZA to expand the treatment options. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected 49 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) clinical isolates from unique patients at Phramongkutklao Hospital (June-October 2020). CZA disk diffusion and E-test testing were performed to obtain minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Each drug regimen was simulated using the Monte Carlo technique to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR). RESULTS: The most common genotypes of CRKP were blaOXA-48 (53.1%) and blaOXA-48 +blaNDM (42.8%). CZA showed 47.7% and 90.5% susceptible rate against all genotypes of carbapenemases and OXA-48 type CRKP isolates. The MIC50 and MIC90 of CZA against CRKP were 2 and >256 µg/mL. The categorical agreement (CA) between disk diffusion and E-test testing of CZA against CRKP was 95.4%. The CZA dosing regimens of 2.5 g infused 2-3 h every 8 h achieved ≥90% of the target of free ceftazidime plasma concentration over MIC (%fTime >MIC) ≥50% and 100% against isolates MICs of ≤8 and ≤8 µg/mL, respectively. The avibactam regimens also provided 100%fTime at 0.5 µg/mL. Based on CFR ≥90%, no CZA regimens were effective against all of the studied CRKP isolates except CRKP carrying OXA-48. CONCLUSION: CZA exhibited a fairly susceptible rate among the OXA-48-positive isolates in Thailand. The current suggested dose of CZA with prolonged infusion appears appropriate to achieve the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets of ceftazidime and avibactam against CRKP carrying blaOXA-48 .

Successful treatment of infective endocarditis due to pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae with ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam.

Pandrug-resistant (PDR) K. pneumoniae refractory to conventional treatment has been reported worldwide, causing a huge burden on the healthcare system, patient safety and the economy. K. pneumoniae is a prominent opportunistic pathogen causing hospital-acquired and community-acquired infections, but is rarely associated with infective endocarditis. Currently, there are sparse data guiding the optimal regimen when commonly used antibiotics fail, notably for the treatment of endocarditis infections. Here we report our experience in treating a 40-year-old female with PDR K. pneumoniae infection of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) and right-sided infective endocarditis. Initial susceptibility testing of the incriminated pathogen showed an apparent susceptibility to colistin but the prolonged course of colistin, gentamicin and meropenem did not resolve the infection. However, the synergistic combinations of aztreonam with ceftazidime-avibactam was able to overcome resistance and clear the infection rapidly. Genome sequencing showed that the PDR K. pneumoniae isolate belongs to the international high-risk clone ST14. The isolate harbored genes encoding NDM-1, OXA-48, CTX-M-14b, SHV-28 and OXA-1, explaining resistance to all ß-lactams, including carbapenems. It carried the armA gene conferring resistance to all clinically important aminoglycosides and had alterations in GyrA, ParC and MgrB, explaining resistance to ciprofloxacin and colistin.

Advances in novel antibiotics to treat multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections.

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing threat to public health and an increasingly common problem for acute care physicians to confront. Several novel antibiotics have been approved in the past decade to combat these infections; however, physicians may be unfamiliar with how to appropriately utilize them. The purpose of this review is to evaluate novel antibiotics active against resistant gram-negative bacteria and highlight clinical information regarding their use in the acute care setting. This review focuses on novel antibiotics useful in the treatment of infections caused by resistant gram-negative organisms that may be seen in the acute care setting. These novel antibiotics include ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilistatin/relebactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, eravacycline, and omadacycline. Acute care physicians should be familiar with these novel antibiotics so they can utilize them appropriately.

POPULATION PHARMACOKINETICS OF CEFTAZIDIME AFTER A SINGLE SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION AND NORMAL ORAL AND CLOACAL BACTERIAL FLORA SURVEY IN EASTERN HELLBENDERS (CRYPTOBRANCHUS ALLEGANIENSIS ALLEGANIENSIS).

Population pharmacokinetics utilizing sparse sampling were used to determine pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) due to their slow growth rate and the limited number of appropriately sized individuals in the zoo-housed population. Twenty-five eastern hellbenders received a single subcutaneous injection of ceftazidime at 20 mg/kg. Each animal had blood samples collected up to four times between 0 and 192 hr postinjection. Plasma samples were analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography. A nonlinear mixed-effects model was fitted to the data to determine typical values for population parameters, an ideal method due to the sampling limitation of each hellbender. Results indicate an elimination half-life of 36.63 hr and volume of distribution of 0.31 L/kg. Antibiotic concentrations were above a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 8 µg/ml for 120 hr. Prior to antibiotic administration, six hellbenders had oral and six other individuals had cloacal swabs taken for aerobic culture. Fifty-five bacterial isolates were obtained (24 cloacal, 31 oral) with 10/12 (83%) individuals growing three or more different isolates and 11/12 (92%) growing Shewanella putrefaciens. Twelve isolates had susceptibility testing performed and all were susceptible to ceftazidime. These results indicate that ceftazidime is an appropriate choice of antibiotic in hellbenders and when given at a dosage of 20 mg/kg subcutaneously, maintains concentrations above the MIC of susceptible bacteria for up to 5 days.

Evaluation of the post-antibiotic effect in vivo for the combination of a ß-lactam antibiotic and a ß-lactamase inhibitor: ceftazidime-avibactam in neutropenic mouse thigh and lung infections.

The post-antibiotic effect (PAE) of ceftazidime-avibactam in vivo was evaluated using models of thigh- and lung-infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in neutropenic mice. In thigh-infected mice, the PAE was negative (-2.18 to -0.11 h) for three of four strains: caused by a 'burst' of rapid bacterial growth after the drug concentrations had fallen below their pre-specified target values. With lung infection, PAE was positive, and longer for target drug concentrations in ELF (>2 h) than plasma (1.69-1.88 h). The time to the start of regrowth was quantified as a new parameter, PAER, which was positive (0.35-1.00 h) in both thigh- and lung-infected mice. In the context that measurements of the PAE of ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations in vivo have not previously been reported, it is noted that the negative values were consistent with previous measurements of the PAE of ceftazidime-avibactam in vitro and of ceftazidime alone in vivo.

Meta-analysis: combination of meropenem vs ceftazidime and amikacin for empirical treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia.

BACKGROUND: Meropenem monotherapy vs ceftazidime plus amikacin have been approved for use against febrile neutropenia. To assess the effectiveness and safety of them for empirical treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials on ceftazidime plus amikacin, or/and monotherapy with meropenem for the treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia were identified by searching Cochrane Library, PubMed, Science Direct, Wiley Online, Science Citation Index, Google (scholar), National Center for Biotechnology Information, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Data on interventions, participants' characteristics and the outcomes of therapy, were extracted for statistical analysis. Seven trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. RESULT: The treatment with ceftazidime plus amikacin was more effective than meropenem (OR = 1.17; 95% CI 0.93-1.46; 1270 participants). However, the treatment effects of the 2 therapy methods were almost parallel in adults (OR = 1.15; 95% CI 0.91-1.46; 1130 participants older than 16). Drug-related adverse effects afflicted more patients treated with ceftazidime plus amikacin (OR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.52-1.15; 1445 participants). The common responses were nausea, diarrhea, rash, and increased in serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase and bilirubin. CONCLUSION: Ceftazidime plus amikacin should be the first choice for empirical treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia, and meropenem may be chosen as a last defense against pathogenic bacteria.

Pioderma gangrenoso ampollar como forma de presentación de leucemia mieloide agudo: informe de un caso / Acute myeloid leukemia presented in the form of bullous pyoderma gangrenosum: a case report

El pioderma gangrenoso ampollar es una variedad infrecuente de pioderma gangrenoso, que se asocia en el 50-70% de los casos con trastornos oncohematológicos. Se comunica el caso de una paciente de 59 años, que consultó por fiebre y ampollas purpúricas de rápida progresión, con compromiso cutáneo mucoso. Con sospecha de una enfermedad neutrofílica, ampollar, o infección por gérmenes oportunistas, se realizó biopsia de piel para estudio histopatológico, inmunofluorescencia directa y cultivo. Los cultivos y la inmunofluorescencia directa fueron negativos, y la anatomía patológica reveló un denso infiltrado inflamatorio con predominio neutrofílico en dermis. Ante el diagnóstico de pioderma gangrenoso ampollar, se realizó una punción-aspiración de médula ósea cuyo resultado fue compatible con leucemia mieloide aguda. Se instauró tratamiento con corticosteroides sistémicos, a pesar de lo cual la paciente evolucionó desfavorablemente y falleció a los 15 días de su ingreso hospitalario. Este caso ilustra la asociación de esta enfermedad cutánea con trastornos oncohematológicos y el mal pronóstico que esto implica a corto plazo. (AU)

Bullous pyoderma gangrenosum is an infrequent type of pyoderma gangrenosum, associated with onco hematological diseases in 50-70% of cases. We present the case of a 59-year-old patient with fever and mucocutaneous hemorrhagic bullous of rapid progression. A biopsy for histopathology, direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and skin culture was made, considering the possibility of neutrophilic dermatoses, bullous dermatosis or an opportunistic infection. The results of both the culture and the DIF were negative. The histopathological examination of the specimen revealed a dense dermal polymorphic infiltrate composed primarily of neutrophils. Considering bullous pyoderma gangrenosum as a potential diagnosis, a bone-marrow biopsy was performed. This study revealed an acute myeloid leukemia. Although systemic corticosteroid therapy was begun, the patient presented an unfavorable evolution that led to her death 15 days after her admission at the hospital. This case shows the association between bullous pyoderma gangrenosum and onco hematological diseases. In addition, it highlights the poor prognosis related to these diseases in the short term. (AU)

Experience of Ceftazidime/avibactam in a UK tertiary cardiopulmonary specialist center.

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial resistance is a major threat to public health. New drugs such as Ceftazidime/avibactam have been developed for the treatment of Multi-Drug resistant (MDR) pathogens. Susceptibility can be variable and inappropriate use can add a financial strain on the National Health Service (NHS). There is a pressing need to ensure these new and invaluable antimicrobials are preserved and used effectively. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective observational study to assess the use of Ceftazidime/avibactam and evaluated prescribing against applied standards. RESULTS: Between August 2017 and January 2019, 28 patients received 31 courses of Ceftazidime/avibactam. Prescribing according to the approved indications was observed for 68% of prescriptions (p < 0.0001). Duration of therapy was often prolonged but improved with Antimicrobial stewardship interventions. We observed 56% susceptibility (15/27 isolates) of MDR organisms (Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, Burkholderia, Enterobacter aerogenes, Achromobacter). We also report first in vivo experience to treat pulmonary disease caused by Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Ceftazidime/avibactam was well tolerated, with no evidence of development of resistance at 6-months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that Antimicrobial stewardship interventions led to a more appropriate use of Ceftazidime/avibactam (as measured by duration of therapy), preserving it as a treatment option for MDR infections.

In vitro pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of continuous ceftazidime infusion alone and in combination with colistin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm.

OBJECTIVES: The pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion (CI) beta-lactams for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm infections has not been defined. This study evaluated the efficacy of several dosage regimens of CI ceftazidime, with or without colistin, an antibiotic with a potential antibiofilm effect, against biofilm-embedded P. aeruginosa. METHODS: Mature biofilms of the reference strain PAO1 and the clinical isolate HUB8 (both ceftazidime- and colistin-susceptible) were investigated over 54h using a dynamic CDC biofilm reactor. CI dosage regimens were ceftazidime monotherapy (4, 10, 20 and 40 mg/L), colistin monotherapy (3.50 mg/L), and combinations of colistin and ceftazidime (4 or 40 mg/L). Efficacy was evaluated by changes in log10colony-forming units (cfu)/mL and confocal microscopy. RESULTS: At 54 h, the antibiofilm activity of ceftazidime monotherapies was slightly higher for ceftazidime 20 mg/L (-2.84 log10cfu/mL) and 40 mg/L (-3.05) against PAO1, but no differences were seen against HUB8. Ceftazidime-resistant colonies emerged with 4 mg/L regimens in both strains and with other regimens in PAO1. Colistin monotherapy had significant antibiofilm activity against HUB8 (-3.07), but lower activity against PAO1 (-1.12), and colistin-resistant strains emerged. Combinations of ceftazidime and colistin had higher antibiofilm activity at 54 h compared with each monotherapy, and prevented the emergence of resistance to both antibiotics; higher antibiofilm activity was observed with ceftazidime 40 mg/L plus colistin compared with ceftazidime 4 mg/L plus colistin (-4.19 vs. -3.10 PAO1; -4.71 vs. -3.44 HUB8). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that, with %T>MIC=100%, CI ceftazidime displayed concentration-dependent antibiofilm activity against P. aeruginosa biofilm, particularly in combination with colistin. These results support the use of high-dosage regimens of CI ceftazidime with colistin against biofilm-associated infections with ceftazidime-susceptible P. aeruginosa.

Antibiotic therapeutic drug monitoring in intensive care patients treated with different modalities of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and renal replacement therapy: a prospective, observational single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Effective antimicrobial treatment is key to reduce mortality associated with bacterial sepsis in patients on intensive care units (ICUs). Dose adjustments are often necessary to account for pathophysiological changes or renal replacement therapy. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly being used for the treatment of respiratory and/or cardiac failure. However, it remains unclear whether dose adjustments are necessary to avoid subtherapeutic drug levels in septic patients on ECMO support. Here, we aimed to evaluate and comparatively assess serum concentrations of continuously applied antibiotics in intensive care patients being treated with and without ECMO. METHODS: Between October 2018 and December 2019, we prospectively enrolled patients on a pneumological ICU in southwest Germany who received antibiotic treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, meropenem, or linezolid. All antibiotics were applied using continuous infusion, and therapeutic drug monitoring of serum concentrations (expressed as mg/L) was carried out using high-performance liquid chromatography. Target concentrations were defined as fourfold above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of susceptible bacterial isolates, according to EUCAST breakpoints. RESULTS: The final cohort comprised 105 ICU patients, of whom 30 were treated with ECMO. ECMO patients were significantly younger (mean age: 47.7 vs. 61.2 years; p < 0.001), required renal replacement therapy more frequently (53.3% vs. 32.0%; p = 0.048) and had an elevated ICU mortality (60.0% vs. 22.7%; p < 0.001). Data on antibiotic serum concentrations derived from 112 measurements among ECMO and 186 measurements from non-ECMO patients showed significantly lower median serum concentrations for piperacillin (32.3 vs. 52.9; p = 0.029) and standard-dose meropenem (15.0 vs. 17.8; p = 0.020) in the ECMO group. We found high rates of insufficient antibiotic serum concentrations below the pre-specified MIC target among ECMO patients (piperacillin: 48% vs. 13% in non-ECMO; linezolid: 35% vs. 15% in non-ECMO), whereas no such difference was observed for ceftazidime and meropenem. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO treatment was associated with significantly reduced serum concentrations of specific antibiotics. Future studies are needed to assess the pharmacokinetic characteristics of antibiotics in ICU patients on ECMO support.