Recurrent disseminated coccidioidal meningitis in two subsequent pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: Recurrent disseminated coccidioidal meningitis in two subsequent pregnancies is rare and can pose a challenge in ensuring the health of both mother and baby. In this unique case we highlight this rare occurrence and subsequent treatment. CASE REPORT: A 29-year-old G4P1021 with a history of disseminated coccidioidomycosis in a previous pregnancy presented at 8 weeks gestation with nausea, headache, and neck pain. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis was positive for recurrent coccidioidal infection. She was started on Amphotericin and discharged. She re-presented at 30 week's gestation with phonophobia and photophobia, emesis, neck pain and swelling. MRI showed evidence of ventriculomegaly with communicating hydrocephalus. She was treated with therapeutic lumbar punctures throughout her pregnancy and a ventriculoperitoneal shunt following delivery. She had a spontaneous vaginal delivery at 38 weeks and 3 days with no complications. CONCLUSION: This unique case highlights the susceptibility of recurrent disseminated coccidioidomycosis in subsequent pregnancies and treatment thereof.

Long-term effectiveness of transforaminal anterolateral approach CT-guided cervical epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy treatment.

AIM: To evaluate the long-term clinical effectiveness of computed tomography (CT)-guided transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injection using an anterolateral approach for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy (CR) using well-established robust clinical scoring systems for neck pain and neck disability. Despite its widespread use, evidence to support the long-term benefit of routine cervical epidural steroid injection is currently very limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 113 patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed CR who underwent a steroid injection at a single cervical level via a unilateral transforaminal anterolateral approach. Pain was assessed quantitatively at pre-injection, 15 minutes post-injection, 1 month, 3 months, and at 1 year. Neck disability was assessed using the Oswestry Neck Disability Index (NDI) at pre-injection, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year time points. RESULTS: Eighty patients completed the study. Sixty per cent reported reduced neck pain (mean pain reduction, 55%), which was clinically significant in 45% cases. Furthermore, 66% reported an improvement in neck disability (mean improvement, 51%), which was clinically significant for 56% patients. Clinically significant good outcomes in both neck pain and neck disability were evident from as early as 1-month, and importantly, were independent both of pre-treatment CR characteristics (including severity of pre-injection neck pain or disability) and of findings on pre-injection MRI imaging. CONCLUSION: Transforaminal anterolateral approach CT-guided epidural steroid injection resulted in a clinically significant long-term improvement in both neck pain and disability for half of the present cohort of patients with unilateral single-level CR. This improvement was independent of the severity of the initial symptoms and pre-injection MRI findings.

Comparison of Selective Nerve Root Pulsed Radiofrequency Vs Paramedian Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Painful Cervical Radiculopathy.

BACKGROUND: Although there are studies evaluating ultrasound-guided selective nerve root pulsed radiofrequency (ULSD-SNRPRF) and fluoroscopy-guided paramedian cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection (FL-CIESI) for the treatment of chronic cervical radicular pain, no study has compared the efficacy of these 2 methods. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of these 2 methods, their superiority to each other, and the incidence of adverse events. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient department of a single-center pain clinic. METHODS: Sixty patients who did not respond to conservative treatments for lower cervical radicular pain were randomly divided into 2 groups. One group underwent ULSD-SNRPRF (Group U), and the other underwent paramedian FL-CIESI (Group F). Patients were evaluated pretreatment, and 3 and 6 months posttreatment. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) was used to assess clinical improvement, The Neck Disability Index (NDI) to assess improvement in functional disability, and the Self-Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Score (S-LANSS) to assess the treatment's effect on neuropathic pain. Clinically significant pain relief was defined as a 50% or more pain reduction in the NRS-11. The posttreatment reduction in medication consumption was assessed using the Medication Quantification Scale Version III (MQS III). We also evaluated whether there was a difference in treatment-related characteristics, such as procedure time and adverse events. RESULTS: The procedure time was significantly longer in Group U. Blood aspiration was observed in 2 patients in Group U and vascular spread in one patient in Group F, with no significant difference. At 3 and 6 months posttreatment, NRS-11 and NDI scores showed a significant decrease compared to the pretreatment scores in both groups; there was no difference between the groups. Both treatments effectively improved neuropathic pain, with no significant difference between the S-LANSS scores. There was no difference in the reduction of medication consumption between the groups. LIMITATIONS: There was no sham or control group, and the follow-up period was limited to 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Pain relief, functional improvement, and safety were similar between groups. ULSD-SNRPRF and paramedian FL-CIESI are 2 different effective techniques for chronic cervical radicular pain. The choice of method should depend on various factors, such as patient preference, operator experience, and availability of resources. An advantage of ULSD over fluoroscopy is that patients and physicians are not exposed to radiation.

Intramuscular paravertebral oxygen-ozone therapy for chronic neck pain and low back pain: evaluation of 6-month clinical outcomes.

Spinal pain is recognized as the most common cause of disability, work absenteeism and need of healthcare services worldwide. Although many strategies have been developed for conservative treatment of spinal pain, its increasing prevalence diagnosis highlights the need for new treatments. Oxygen-ozone (O2-O3) therapy is considered to be an alternative therapy due to its analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. This retrospective study evaluated the effects of O2-O3 intramuscular paravertebral injections in 76 patients with chronic neck pain or low back pain, in terms of pain and disability reduction, quality of life improvement, and analgesic drug intake. Patients were evaluated before, at the end of the treatment, and at 1, 3 and 6 months after the last treatment, using Numeric Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index or Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form-12 Health Survey. There were significant beneficial effects of O2-O3 therapy in reducing pain and disability reduction and improving quality of life during the 6-month follow-up period. O2-O3 therapy was associated with a reduction in analgesic drug intake at each assessment. Our results allow us not only to support treatment with O2-O3 intramuscular paravertebral injections as a safe and beneficial treatment for chronic low back pain, but also to consider it as a valuable conservative therapy for patients with chronic neck pain.

Does That Go There? A Rare Occurrence of Spontaneous Sternocleidomastoid Abscess without Trauma in a Diabetic Individual.

BACKGROUND Spontaneous abscesses are generally typical in patients with significant risk factors and have been linked to numerous muscle groups. The sternocleidomastoid muscle, however, piqued our interest as an unusual location, especially in this patient who, other than diabetes mellitus, had no associated risk factors or signs of trauma. CASE REPORT A 61-year-old man appeared with neck pain, erythema, and swelling that had been present for 9 days and for which he had previously been examined in the Emergency Department. He was discharged on oral doxycycline after initial computed tomography (CT) of the neck revealed infiltration without collection. He returned with worsening symptoms and new-onset fever and chills. Vital signs were normal on assessment, with no evidence of trauma. Swelling was observed near the right sternocleidomastoid muscle insertion. A repeat CT scan of the neck revealed an abscess 2.5 cm in diameter. He was originally treated with empiric antibiotics before being moved to targeted medications. Incision and drainage were completed without complication. The patient was given a 6-week course of oral antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS Spontaneous intramuscular abscesses are uncommon in people who have had no previous trauma or other known risk factors, but could be encountered in diabetic patients with non-optimal blood glucose levels, due to bacteremia. As a result, these cases require a high level of suspicion to be recognized and treated early. The scarcity of literature on this illness makes determining the cause challenging. However, by highlighting this case, we intend to raise awareness and facilitate early diagnosis and treatment.

Estudio comparativo de una asociación de diclofenac, betametasona y vitamina b12 (blokium b12®) con diclofenac (sin asociar) en el tratamiento de patología dolorosa de columna con compromiso neural / COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AN ASSOCIATION OF DICLOFENAC, BETAMETASONE AND VITAMIN B12 (BLOKIUM B12®) WITH DICLOFENAC (WITHOUT ASSOCIATION) IN THE TREATMENT OF PAINFUL SPINE PATHOLOGY WITH NEURAL COMMITMENT

El dolor lumbar bajo y el dolor cervical con o sin irradiación son causas muy comunes de consulta a los médicos generalistas en los países desarrollados. La discopatía aguda y el dolor por estenosis del canal espinal son los diagnósticos más frecuentes. La postura tradicional ha sido la de administrar antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINES) para estas lumbalgias o cervicalgias agudas. Cuando existe irradiación neural por compresión radicular es usual asociar al AINE un corticoide a baja dosis, así como un antineurítico, para lograr un mejor resultado. Con el objeto de documentar la utilidad de esta práctica habitual, efectuamos en 142 pacientes ambulatorios un estudio multicéntrico randomizado que compara la efectividad y la tolerancia de una asociación a dosis fija de diclofenac, betametasona y cianocobalamina administrada por vía oral versus la administración de diclofenac como monofármaco en el tratamiento de la patología dolorosa de la columna lumbar y cervical asociada a compresión neural. La asociación demostró ser más eficaz en controlar el dolor y mejorar la funcionalidad de los pacientes que la administración de diclofenac en forma aislada y se asoció a escasos efectos colaterales, principalmente digestivos

Low back pain and neck pain with or without radiation are very common causes of consultation with general practitioners in developed countries. Acute discopathy and pain due to spinal canal stenosis are the most frequent diagnoses. The traditional approach has been to administer non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for these acute low back or cervical pain. When there is neural radiation due to root compression, it is usual to associate a low-dose corticosteroid with the NSAID, as well as an antineuritic, to achieve a better result. In order to document the usefulness of this routine practice, we conducted a randomized multicenter study in 142 outpatients that compared the effectiveness and tolerance of a fixed-dose combination of diclofenac, betamethasone, and cyanocobalamin administered orally versus the administration of diclofenac as Monopharmaceutical in the treatment of painful pathology of the lumbar and cervical spine associated with neural compression. The association proved to be more effective in controlling pain and improving the functionality of patients than the administration of diclofenac in isolation and was associated with few side effects, mainly digestive

Síndrome de Eagle hacia la delimitación clínica / Eagle syndrome: Toward a clinical delimitation

Objetivos: El dolor orofacial y cervical es un motivo de consulta frecuente, y puede deberse a múltiples procesos patológicos. Entre ellos se encuentra el síndrome de Eagle, entidad muy infrecuente cuyo origen se atribuye a una osificación del ligamento estilohioideo o una elongación de la apófisis estiloides. Presentamos una serie de cinco pacientes con dicho diagnóstico.Material y métodosSe describen las características demográficas y clínicas de cinco pacientes atendidos en la Unidad de Cefaleas de dos hospitales terciarios por un cuadro compatible con síndrome de Eagle, y su respuesta a distintos tratamientos.ResultadosSe trata de tres varones y dos mujeres de entre 24 y 51 años, con dolor de localización predominante en un oído y la región amigdalina ipsilateral, de cualidad sorda y de gran intensidad. En todos ellos el patrón temporal era crónico y continuo, con exacerbaciones desencadenadas por la deglución. Cuatro pacientes habían realizado múltiples consultas en servicios de otorrinolaringología, y uno de ellos había recibido tratamiento antibiótico ante la sospecha de tubaritis. En todos los casos la palpación de la fosa amigdalina resultó dolorosa. En tres de los pacientes se demostró elongación de la apófisis estiloides y/o calcificación del ligamento estilohioideo mediante tomografía computarizada. Cuatro mejoraron con tratamiento neuromodulador (duloxetina, gabapentina, pregabalina) y solo uno precisó cirugía con escisión de la apófisis estiloides.ConclusionesEl síndrome de Eagle es una causa de dolor craneofacial poco frecuente y posiblemente infradiagnosticada. Aportamos cinco nuevos casos que permiten delimitar tanto la semiología como los posibles tratamientos. (AU)

Objectives: Orofacial and cervical pain are a frequent reason for neurology consultations and may be due to multiple pathological processes. These include Eagle syndrome (ES), a very rare entity whose origin is attributed to calcification of the stylohyoid ligament or elongation of the temporal styloid process. We present a series of five patients diagnosed with ES.Material and methodsWe describe the demographic and clinical characteristics and response to treatment of 5 patients who attended the headache units of two tertiary hospitals for symptoms compatible with Eagle syndrome.ResultsThe patients were three men and two women aged between 24 and 51, presenting dull, intense pain, predominantly in the inner ear and the ipsilateral tonsillar fossa. All patients had chronic, continuous pain in the temporal region, with exacerbations triggered by swallowing. Four patients had previously consulted several specialists at otorhinolaryngology departments; one had been prescribed antibiotics for suspected Eustachian tube inflammation. In all cases, the palpation of the tonsillar fossa was painful. Computed tomography scans revealed an elongation of the styloid process and/or calcification of the stylohyoid ligament in three patients. Four patients improved with neuromodulatory therapy (duloxetine, gabapentin, pregabalin) and only one required surgical excision of the styloid process.ConclusionsEagle syndrome is a rare and possibly underdiagnosed cause of craniofacial pain. We present five new cases that exemplify both the symptoms and the potential treatments of this entity. (AU)

Disfonía como efecto secundario dosis dependiente del tratamiento con duloxetina / Dysphonia as side-effect dose-dependent during treatment with duloxetine

La duloxetina es un antidepresivo inhibidor de la recaptación de serotonina y noradrenalina (IRSN) utilizado para el tratamiento de la depresión mayor, así como el dolor neuropático. La dosis recomendada para el dolor neuropático es de 60 mg una vez al día

Duloxetine is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) is indicated for the management of major depressive disorder and neuropathic pain. The dose recommended for neuropathic pain is 60 mg once a day

Espondilodiscitis cervical / Cervical spondylodiscitis

No disponible

Estudio controlado, doble ciego, randomizado, multicéntrico, para evaluar la eficacia de la combinación fija tiocolchicósido más diclofenaco potásico en contracturas / Multicentered, randomized, double-blind and controlled study for the evaluation of efficacy of a set combination of thiocolchicoside plus potasium diclofenac in spams

Objetivo: determinar la eficacia y la tolerabilidad de la combinación a dosis fija, en una sola tableta, de tiocolchicósido 4 mg más diclofenaco potásico 50 mg en la reducción de la contractura muscular aguda estriada dolorosa comparado contra placebo y el uso de paracetamol tabletas de 500 mg como medicación de rescate. Métodos: fueron reclutados 97 pacientes de 2 ciudades ecuatorianas, Quito y Guayaquil, en tres centros de investigación, públicos y privados, con cervicalgia, dorsalgia y lumbalgia, principalmente de causa funcional. Los pacientes fueron asignados al azar en dos grupos: 1) grupo medicación activa, tiocolchicósido más diclofenaco potásico, 50 pacientes, 2) grupo placebo 47 pacientes. La eficacia en ambos grupos se evaluó por la reducción de la contractura muscular apreciada por inspección, palpación y reducción del dolor medido por una escala visual análoga, después de 5 días de tratamiento. Resultados: la evolución del grado de contractura muscular en el grupo medicación activa por evaluación visual pasó de un 100 por ciento con contractura visible con o sin actividad antiálgica fija a 96 por ciento sin signos visibles de contractura; de un 82 por ciento de contractura moderada a severa con o sin dolor evocado por palpación a un 74 por ciento de contractura leve sin dolor y 26 por ciento de ausencia de contractura. El promedio de dolor según la escala visual análoga disminuyó de 6,66 cm antes del tratamiento a 0,86 cm al finalizar el quinto día de tratamiento. Los efectos adversos fueron leves en el grupo tratado. Conclusiones: la combinación fija de tiocolchicósido 4 mg más diclofenaco potásico 50 mg en una sola tableta, administrado dos veces al día, es eficaz en el manejo de la contractura muscular aguda dolorosa de diversa etiología de manera estadísticamente significativa, bien tolerada y no altera el rendimiento psicomotor(AU)

Objective: to determine the efficacy and tolerability of a combination at a set dose in a single tablet of thiocolchicoside 4 mg plus potassium diclofenac 50 mg in the reduction of painful acute muscle spasm compared with the placebo and the use of 500 mg paracetamol as rescue medication. Methods: ninety seven patients from two Ecuador cities, named Quito and Guayaquil, were recruited in three research centers, both public and private. They suffered cervical pain, low back pain and dorsal pain, mainly of functional cause. The patients were randomly assigned in two groups 1) active medication group with 50 patients treated with thiocolchicoside plus potassium diclofenac and 2) placebo group with 47 patients. The efficacy of both groups was evaluated by the reduction of muscle spams observed in checking, palpation and pain reduction measured in an analogue visual scale after 5 days of treatment. Results: the progress of the muscle spasm degree in the active medication group according to visual evaluation went from 100 percent with visible spasm with or without fixed antialgic activity to 96 percent with no visible signs of spasm; from 82 percent of moderate spasm to severe with or without evoked pain by palpation to 74 percent of mild spasm without pain and 26 percent of spasm-free muscle. The pain average according to the visual scale decreased from 6.66 cm before treatment to 0,86 cm after the 5th day. The adverse effects were mild in t he treated group. Conclusions: the fixed combination of thiocolchicoside 4mg plus potassium diclofenac 50 mg in a single tablet, administered two times a day is efficacious in the painful acute muscle spasm of diverse etiology in a statistically significant way, well-tolerated and with no alteration of the psychomotor performance(AU)

Clinical Outcomes of Epidural Neuroplasty for Cervical Disc Herniation

Cervical disc herniation is a common disorder characterized by neck pain radiating to the arm and fingers as determined by the affected dermatome. This condition has a favorable prognosis, but pain can have a serious detrimental impact on daily activities. Epidural neuroplasty has been applied as a treatment option for cervical disc herniation; however, no study has addressed the clinical outcomes. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical outcomes of epidural neuroplasty on 128 patients for the treatment of cervical disc herniation. To measure pain-related disabilities over time, the changes of pain scores in neck and arm were evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) and the neck disability index (NDI). Compared with preprocedural values, the pain NRS of neck and arm demonstrated significant improvement at day 1, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure (P < 0.001). Likewise, the NDI was significantly reduced at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure (P < 0.001). There were no serious complications. Cervical epidural neuroplasty shows good clinical outcomes in the treatment of cervical disc herniation and can be considered a treatment modality for cervical disc herniation refractory to conservative treatment.

Mesoterapia como opción terapéutica en patología dolorosa del aparato locomotor / Mesotherapy as a therapeutic option in painful condition of locomotor apparatus

Introducción. La mesoterapia es una técnica que consiste en la aplicación de múltiples inyecciones intradérmicas (dermis profunda) con diferentes fármacos según las patologías a tratar. Es utilizada en distintas especialidades médicas, siendo especialmente interesante su uso en dolor, síntoma prevalente en nuestra especialidad. Introducción. El objetivo de este trabajo es valorar la eficacia y seguridad de este tratamiento en pacientes con patología dolorosa crónica del aparato locomotor. Material y métodos. Realizamos un estudio prospectivo de los resultados obtenidos con la aplicación de esta técnica en 59 pacientes, derivados a la consulta de Rehabilitación y afectos de distintas patologías. Los fármacos utilizados para el tratamiento del dolor fueron una combinación de Piroxicam, Lidocaína al 1% y Pentoxifilina. Para evaluar resultados utilizamos al inicio y final del proceso la Escala Visual Analógica (EVA), el Cuestionario de salud EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D tarifa) y la medición del diámetro de la zona dolorosa. El análisis estadístico se realizó con el programa informático SPSS V15.0 y el método consistió en una comparación de medias utilizando una t de student para datos emparejados de cada uno de las tres instrumentos de medida utilizados. Resultados y conclusiones. Ningún paciente abandonó el tratamiento. Edad media: 46 años. El 74,5% de pacientes fueron mujeres. La cervicalgia fue la patología más frecuentemente tratada. Demostramos una mejoría estadísticamente significativa (p<0,001) de la patología dolorosa del aparato locomotor tras el tratamiento con mesoterapia, con unos descensos medios de 52,28mm (IC 95%: 44,78–59,79) en la EVA y de 45,86cm (IC 95%: 30,97–60,75) en el diámetro de la lesión y un aumento medio en el EQ-5D tarifa de 0,3550 (IC 95%: 0,2924–0,4177). Como únicos efectos secundarios, un 26% de pacientes presentaron hematomas en la zona de aplicación que se resolvieron espontáneamente. Resultados y conclusiones. La mesoterapia es un método de tratamiento eficaz y seguro para el tratamiento de la patología dolorosa crónica del aparato locomotor(AU)

Introduction. Mesotherapy is a technique that consists in the application of multiple intradermal injections (deep dermis) with different drugs according to the conditions to be treated. It is used in different medical specialties, its use being especially interesting in pain, a prevalent symptom in our specialty. Introduction. This work has aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of this treatment in patients with chronic painful condition of the locomotor apparatus. Material and methods. We conducted a prospective study of the results obtained with the application of this technique in 59 patients, referred from the Rehabilitation Service, suffering from different conditions. The medications used for pain treatment were a combination of Piroxicam, Lidocaine 1% and Pentoxifylline. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Health Questionnaire EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D Index score) and the measurement of the painful zone diameter were used to evaluate the results. The statistical analysis was conducted with the SPSS V15.0 computer program and the method consisted in a comparison of means, using the Student's T test for matched data of each of the 3 measurement instruments used. Results and conclusions. None of the patients dropped out of the treatment. Their mean age was 46 years old and 74.5% of the patients were women. Neck pain was the most frequently treated condition. We have demonstrated a statistically significant improvement (p<0.001) of the painful condition of the locomotor apparatus after mesotherapy treatment, with mean decreases of 52.28mm (95% CI: 44.78–59.79) in the VAS, 45.86cm (95% CI: 30.97–60.75) in the lesion diameter and average increase in the EQ-5D Index score of 0.3550 (95% CI: 0.2924–0.4177). As side effects, 26% of the patients had hematomas in the application zone that resolved spontaneously. Results and conclusions. Mesotherapy is a safe and effective method for the treatment of chronic painful condition of the locomotor apparatus(AU)

Epidurales cervicales: ¿Cómo, dónde, cuándo y por qué? La controversia continua / Cervical epidural injections: How, where, when and why? Still a controversial matter

Las inyecciones cervicales epidurales de esteroides se realizan comúnmente en pacientes con cuadros dolorosos en esa región, incluyendo patología discal degenerativa, síndrome post-laminectomía, dolores cervicales radiculares, etc. El mecanismo de acción aún no se conoce con claridad, pero se especula que los esteroides inyectados cerca del área afectada disminuyen el proceso inflamatorio responsable del dolor. El propósito de este procedimiento puede ser terapéutico o diagnóstico, y realizarse por vía interlaminar o transforaminal. En los últimos años, se han informado complicaciones severas con el uso de este tipo de inyecciones. En esta revisión discutiremos las bases anatómicas por las cuales una técnica puede preferirse a otra, así como los pro y contra de cada uno de estos procedimientos, con una breve visión general acerca de las mejores alternativas y sugerencias para evitar complicaciones catastróficas.

Epidurales cervicales: ¿Cómo, dónde, cuándo y por qué? La controversia continua / Cervical epidural injections: How, where, when and why? Still a controversial matter

Las inyecciones cervicales epidurales de esteroides se realizan comúnmente en pacientes con cuadros dolorosos en esa región, incluyendo patología discal degenerativa, síndrome post-laminectomía, dolores cervicales radiculares, etc. El mecanismo de acción aún no se conoce con claridad, pero se especula que los esteroides inyectados cerca del área afectada disminuyen el proceso inflamatorio responsable del dolor. El propósito de este procedimiento puede ser terapéutico o diagnóstico, y realizarse por vía interlaminar o transforaminal. En los últimos años, se han informado complicaciones severas con el uso de este tipo de inyecciones. En esta revisión discutiremos las bases anatómicas por las cuales una técnica puede preferirse a otra, así como los pro y contra de cada uno de estos procedimientos, con una breve visión general acerca de las mejores alternativas y sugerencias para evitar complicaciones catastróficas. (AU)