Ethnic comparison in takotsubo syndrome: novel insights from the International Takotsubo Registry.

BACKGROUND: Ethnic disparities have been reported in cardiovascular disease. However, ethnic disparities in takotsubo syndrome (TTS) remain elusive. This study assessed differences in clinical characteristics between Japanese and European TTS patients and determined the impact of ethnicity on in-hospital outcomes. METHODS: TTS patients in Japan were enrolled from 10 hospitals and TTS patients in Europe were enrolled from 32 hospitals participating in the International Takotsubo Registry. Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between Japanese and European patients. RESULTS: A total of 503 Japanese and 1670 European patients were included. Japanese patients were older (72.6 ± 11.4 years vs. 68.0 ± 12.0 years; p < 0.001) and more likely to be male (18.5 vs. 8.4%; p < 0.001) than European TTS patients. Physical triggering factors were more common (45.5 vs. 32.0%; p < 0.001), and emotional triggers less common (17.5 vs. 31.5%; p < 0.001), in Japanese patients than in European patients. Japanese patients were more likely to experience cardiogenic shock during the acute phase (15.5 vs. 9.0%; p < 0.001) and had a higher in-hospital mortality (8.2 vs. 3.2%; p < 0.001). However, ethnicity itself did not appear to have an impact on in-hospital mortality. Machine learning approach revealed that the presence of physical stressors was the most important prognostic factor in both Japanese and European TTS patients. CONCLUSION: Differences in clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes between Japanese and European TTS patients exist. Ethnicity does not impact the outcome in TTS patients. The worse in-hospital outcome in Japanese patients, is mainly driven by the higher prevalence of physical triggers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT01947621.

Racial and ethnic disparities in the management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear if there remain racial/ethnic differences in the management and in-hospital outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) in contemporary practice. METHODS: We used the National inpatient Sample (2012-2017) to identify a cohort of adult AMI-CS hospitalizations. Race was classified as White, Black and Others (Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, Native Americans). Primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included use of invasive cardiac procedures, length of hospital stay and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Among 203,905 AMI-CS admissions, 70.4% were White, 8.1% were Black and 15.7% belonged to Other races. Black AMI-CS admissions were more often female, with lower socio-economic status, greater comorbidity, and higher rates of non-ST-segment-elevation AMI-CS, cardiac arrest, and multi-organ failure. Compared to White AMI-CS admissions, Black and Other races had lower rates of coronary angiography (75.3% vs 69.3% vs 73.6%), percutaneous coronary intervention (52.7% vs 48.6% vs 54.8%), and mechanical circulatory devices (48.3% vs 42.8% vs 43.7%) (all p < 0.001). Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was comparable between White (33.3%) and Black (33.8%) admissions, but lower for other races (32.1%). Adjusted analysis with White race as the reference identified lower in-hospital mortality for Black (odds ratio [OR] 0.85 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.82-0.88]; p < 0.001) and Other races (OR 0.97 [95% CI 0.94-1.00]; p = 0.02). Admissions of Black race had longer hospital stay, and less frequent discharges to home. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous studies, we identified Black and Other race AMI-CS admissions had lower in-hospital mortality despite lower rates of cardiac procedures when compared to White admissions.

Frequency of Management of Cardiogenic Shock With Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices According to Race.

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has influenced the management of cardiogenic shock (CS), but the association between race and MCS utilization is unknown. We sought to evaluate the effect of race on MCS utilization in CS and whether there are racial differences in in-hospital outcomes. Our study was a population-based retrospective cohort study that enrolled patients with CS, defined by International classification of disease, ninth Revision, clinical modification (ICD-9-CM) codes, between 2013 and 2015 from the National Inpatient Sample. Race was adjudicated by National Inpatient Sample and included White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American. The primary outcomes were the utilization of MCS devices in CS with and without acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and in-hospital mortality by race. The statistical adjustment was performed for clinical co-morbidities as well as in-hospital events using multivariate logistic regressions. Among 332,885 patients with CS, there were 71% white and 14% black patients, and AMI was present in 42% and MCS was utilized in 23% of patients. There was less utilization of MCS only in Black patients with CS, and with AMI after adjustment (odds ratio [OR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI][0.79 to 0.89] and OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.92, respectively). In addition, only Black patients had greater in-hospital mortality in AMI after adjustment (OR 1.16, 95% CI [1.06 to 1.27]) whereas there was no statistically significant increase in in-hospital mortality in any other race. In conclusion, these results suggest that there is less utilization of MCS devices and, in parallel, increased odds of in-hospital mortality in Black patients in comparison to other races. Further steps may be needed to address possible implicit bias in acute clinical scenarios as new devices emerge, which carries new opportunities to improve clinical outcomes but there is a lack of clear guidelines.

[Risk factors and treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock].

Aim: To assess risk factors and prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) in Poland. Methods: Data from The Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (PL-ACS) were analysed in 2008-2012. A total of 57400 consecutive STEMI patients included. The results of treatment and prognosis of patients with and without CS were compared. An additional analysis of the prognosis of men and women with CS was performed. Results: There were 34.2% of women and 65.8% of men. CS was diagnosed in 3589 (6.3%) patients (females 7.3% vs. males 5.7%, p<0.003). In multivariate analysis CS was the strongest factor affecting both inhospital (OR 2.51; 95%CI 2.25-2.80; p<0.0001) and 12-month (OR 2.09; 95%CI 1.96-2.24; p<0.0001) mortality. The worst prognosis was associated with pulmonary edema, advanced age, left or right bundle branch block, atrial fibrillation, and anterior MI. An early invasive strategy up to six hours from the symptom onset were the only factors reducing in-hospital and 12-month mortality. Despite of high female ratio in the group with CS and higher mortality in the female group, the female sex did not influence the in-hospital prognosis. Conclusion: In spite of enormous progress in the treatment of STEMI cardiogenic shock remains an important complication affecting the in-hospital and long-term prognosis. A symptom onset-to-treatment time is the key element in the management of patients with CS. Proper diagnosis and management including wide interventional strategy implementation increase the survival chance. An intensive study on novel treatment modalities and on effective identification methods of patients at risk and are warranted.

Age adjusted nationwide trends in the incidence of all cause and ST elevation myocardial infarction associated cardiogenic shock based on gender and race in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Recent improvement in the care of patients with myocardial infarction should lead to better outcome. The goal of this study was to evaluate the incidence of all cause cardiogenic shock (CS) and CS occurring in the setting of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the United States. METHOD: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was utilized to calculate the age-adjusted incident rate of CS from 1996 to 2006 based on ICD-9 coding in the setting of STEMI. Furthermore, we evaluated this trend based on race and gender. RESULTS: A total population of 52,784,917 patients was available between 1996 and 2006. We found that the incidence of all cause CS has not changed over time. However, in the setting of STEMI, CS has been declining slowly over the last 10 years. The age-adjusted rate for CS was 4.3 per 100,000 in 1996 which remained steady with an incidence of 3.1 per 100.000 in 2006 (p<0.01). This decline was persistent across different race or gender. However, African Americans and female gender had persistently lower rate of CS. CONCLUSION: Advancement in the treatment of acute STEMI has led to gradual reduction in the incidence of STEMI related cardiogenic shock irrespective of ethnicities or gender suggesting improving outcome of patients presenting with STEMI in recent years.

Gradual decline in the age-adjusted in-hospital mortality rate from STEMI-related cardiogenic shock irrespective of cause, race or gender with persistent higher mortality rates in women despite multivariate adjustment.

BACKGROUND: Recent improvements in the care of critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) should be associated with improved outcomes. The goal of this study was to evaluate the trends of age-adjusted mortality rates for all-cause and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-related CS in the United States. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was utilized to calculate the age-adjusted mortality rate of all-cause and STEMI-related CS from 1996 to 2006. We used specific ICD- 9 codes for CS and STEMI based on race and gender. RESULTS: We found a gradual decrease in mortality over the 10-year period in patients suffering from all causes or STEMI-related CS irrespective of gender and race with a persistently higher mortality rates in women and African Americans. However, after multivariate adjustment, only female gender remains associated with persistently higher mortality. The age-adjusted mortality rate from STEMI-related CS in women was 2.2% in 1996, with a gradual reduction to the lowest level of 1.7% in 2006 (P<.01). Likewise, the age-adjusted mortality rate from STEMI-related CS in men was 1.7% in 1996, which declined to the lowest level of 1.4% in 2006 (P<.01). CONCLUSION: Regardless of gender and race, age-adjusted in-hospital mortality is gradually declining in patients presenting with all causes or STEMI-related CS. However, as compared to men, women suffer from persistently higher mortality rates in the setting of STEMI-related CS despite multivariate adjustment.