Evaluation of putative inhibitors of mitochondrial permeability transition for brain disorders--specificity vs. toxicity.

Inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition (mPT) has emerged as a promising approach for neuroprotection and development of well-tolerated mPT inhibitors with favorable blood-brain barrier penetration is highly warranted. In a recent study, 28 clinically available drugs with a common heterocyclic structure were identified as mPT inhibitors e.g. trifluoperazine, promethazine and nortriptyline. In addition, neuroprotection by structurally unrelated drugs e.g. neurosteroids, 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen and trimetazidine has been attributed to direct inhibition of mPT. The regulation of mPT is complex and highly dependent on the prevailing experimental conditions. Several features of mPT, such as swelling, depolarization or NADH oxidation, can also occur independently of the mPT phenomenon. Here, in isolated rodent brain-derived and human liver mitochondria, we re-evaluate drugs promoted as potent mPT inhibitors. We address the definition of an mPT inhibitor and present strategies to reliably detect mPT inhibition in vitro. Surprisingly, none of the 12 compounds tested displayed convincing mPT inhibition or effects comparable to cyclophilin D inhibition by the non-immunosuppressive cyclophilin inhibitor D-MeAla(3)-EtVal(4)-Cyclosporin (Debio 025). Propofol and 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2-APB) inhibited swelling in de-energized mitochondria but did not increase calcium retention capacity (CRC). Progesterone, trifluoperazine, allopregnanolone and 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen dose-dependently reduced CRC and respiratory control and were thus toxic rather than beneficial to mitochondrial function. Interestingly, topiramate increased CRC at high concentrations likely by a mechanism separate from direct mPT inhibition. We conclude that a clinically relevant mPT inhibitor should have a mitochondrial target and increase mitochondrial calcium retention at concentrations which can be translated to human use.

Phase 1 clinical study of cyclophilin B peptide vaccine for patients with lung cancer.

Cyclophilin B (CypB) possesses two antigenic epitopes (CypB(84-92) and CypB(91-99) ) recognized by HLA-A24-restricted and tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). To determine the safety of CypB-derived peptides and its ability to generate antitumor immune responses, patients with advanced lung cancer received subcutaneous vaccinations of these peptides or their modified peptides. All 16 patients were vaccinated with CypB(91-99) or its modified peptide, whereas only two patients were vaccinated with the modified CypB(84-92), as immediate-type hypersensitivity to CypB(84-92) or its modified peptide was observed in the remaining patients. No severe adverse events were associated with the vaccination. No significant increase in cellular responses to either peptides or tumor cells was observed in the postvaccination PBMCs by the conventional CTL assays in any patients tested. These results suggest that the vaccination of CypB(91-99) peptide was safe, but failed to induce objective immune responses at this regimen.