Composite performance indicators for helmet and seat-belt enforcement as imprecise data.

OBJECTIVES: Composite road safety performance indicators (RSPIs) are useful tools in regional road safety planning. Among the indicators and data calculated by the World Health Organization (WHO), information on the effectiveness of law enforcement on various risk factors for road casualties were provided, which can be considered as qualitative indicators. The purpose of this study is to analyze the performance indicators related to the percentage of helmet and seat-belt use versus the qualitative enforcement scores attributed by WHO. METHODS: This analysis was performed for 30 member states of WHO and will show how and with what degree of efficiency the qualitative output of the enforcement score acts versus the input percentage of seat-belt and helmet use. The qualitative nature of the output index has led us to depart the traditional analysis of crisp numerical indicators related to road safety performance and to consider data as imprecise or fuzzy indices. In this study we used two methods including imprecise DEA-based CIs and fuzzy DEA-based CIs, respectively. RESULTS: Results show that the clear score achieved by the Imprecise DEA-based CI model is easy to interpret and use. Whereas, in the Fuzzy DEA-based CI model, the fuzzy indicator scores obtained based on the level of several probabilities are strong in capturing the uncertainties related to human behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Both RSPIs are applicable with slight differences that were in the order of countries and the ease of reading the results. We also found that each method has different strengths and that the FDEA-based CIs method is more accurate and more in line with the inputs than the IDEA-based CIs method.

Psychological Constructs Related to Seat Belt Use: A Nationally Representative Survey Study.

Seat belt use can significantly reduce fatalities in motor vehicle crashes (Kahane, 2000). Nevertheless, the current U.S. seat belt use rate of 89.6% (Enriquez & Pickrell, 2019) indicates that a relatively small but pervasive portion of the population does not wear seat belts on a full-time basis. Whereas much is known about the demographic predictors of seat belt use, far less is understood about psychological factors that predict individual proclivities toward using or not using a seat belt. In this study, we examined some of these potential psychological predictors. A probability-based web survey was conducted with 6,038 U.S. residents aged 16 or older who reported having driven or ridden in a car in the past year. We measured self-reported seat belt use and 18 psychological constructs and found that delay of gratification, life satisfaction, risk aversion, risk perception, and resistance to peer influence were positively associated with belt use. Impulsivity and social resistance orientation were negatively associated with belt use. Prior research has shown that psychological factors like delay of gratification, risk aversion/perception, and impulsivity predict other health behaviors (e.g., cigarette smoking, sunscreen use); our results extend this literature to seat belts and can aid the development of traffic safety programs targeted at non-users who-due to such factors-may be resistant to more traditional countermeasures such as legislation and enforcement.

Revisiting the relationship between traffic accidents, real economic activity and other factors in Spain.

This paper analyzes the relationship between road traffic accidents and real economic activity in Spain, using data on accidents, fatalities and injuries from January 1975 to December 2016. Our results show the historical asymmetric cyclical behavior of traffic accidents variables. This relationship is more evident for accidents and injuries, while fatalities have shown a different pattern since 2002. Besides using aggregate data, we have analyzed urban and nonurban accidents separately. We analyze the effect of economic variables, public policy interventions and other potential factors affecting traffic series. Regarding policy interventions, we confirm a permanent reduction in all accident rates associated with the mandatory use of seatbelts on car passengers since 1992. However, the penalty points system introduced in July 2006 has only had temporary effects. We have also shown the effect of economic variables such as Industrial Production Index, gasoline and diesel consumption and registration of new vehicles and, as a novelty, the benefits of using the composite coincident and leading indicators of the Spanish economy.

The impact of state laws on motor vehicle fatality rates, 1999-2015.

BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle crash (MVC) fatalities have been declining while states passed various legislation targeting driver behaviors. This study assesses the impact of state laws on MVC fatality rates to determine which laws were effective. METHODS: Publically available data were collected on driver-related motor vehicle laws, law strengths, enactment years, and numbers of verified-trauma centers. Prospective data on crash characteristics and MVC fatalities 16 years or older from Fatality Analysis Reporting System 1999 to 2015 (n = 850) were obtained. Generalize Linear Autoregressive Modeling was used to assess the relative contribution of state laws to the crude MVC fatality rate while controlling for other factors. RESULTS: Lowering the minimum blood alcohol content (BAC) was associated with largest declines for all ages, especially the older cohorts: 16 years to 20 years (B = 0.23; p < 0.001), 21 years to 55 years (B = 1.7; p < 0.001); 56 years to 65 years (B = 3.2; p < 0.001); older than 65 years (B = 4.1; p < 0.001). Other driving under the influence laws were also significant. Per se BAC laws accompanying a reduced BAC further contributed to declines in crude fatality rates: 21 years to 55 years (B = -0.13; p < 0.001); older than 65 years (B = -0.17; p < 0.05). Driving under the influence laws enhancing the penalties, making revocation automatic, or targeting social hosts had mixed effects by age. Increased enforcement, mandatory education, vehicle impoundment, interlock devices, and underage alcohol laws showed no association with declining mortality rates. Red light camera and seatbelt laws were associated with declines in mortality rates for all ages except for older than 65 years cohort, but speed camera laws had no effect. Graduated Driver License laws were associated with declines for 16 years to 21 years (B = -0.06; p < 0.001) only. Laws targeting specific risks (elderly, motorcycles, marijuana) showed no effect on declining MVC mortality rates during the study period. CONCLUSION: States have passed a wide variety of laws with varying effectiveness. A few key laws, specifically laws lowering allowable BAC, implementing red light cameras, and mandating seatbelt use significantly reduced MVC mortality rates from 1999 to 2015. Simply adding more laws/penalties may not equate directly to lives saved. Continued research on state laws will better inform policy makers to meet evolving public health needs in the management of MVC fatalities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, Level III.

Using change in a seat belt law to study racially-biased policing in South Carolina.

Seat belt laws have increased seat belt use in the US and contributed to reduced fatalities and injuries. However, these policies provide the potential for increased discrimination. The objective of this study is to determine whether a change in seat belt use enforcement led to a differential change in the number of stops, arrests, and searches to White, Black and Hispanic drivers in one US state. We used data on 1,091,424 traffic stops conducted by state troopers in South Carolina in 2005 and 2006 to examine how the change from secondary to primary enforcement of seat belt use in December 2005 affected the number of stops, arrests, and searches to White, Black, and Hispanic drivers using quasi-Poisson and logistic regressions. We found that the policy led to a 50% increase in the number of non-speeding stops for White drivers, and that this increase was 5% larger among Black drivers [RR (95% CI) = 1.05 (1.00, 1.10)], but not larger among Hispanic drivers [1.00 (0.93, 1.08)]. The policy decreased arrests and searches among non-speeding stops, with larger decreases for Black vs. White drivers [RR searches = 0.86 (0.81, 0.91) and RR arrests = 0.90 (0.85, 0.96)]. For Hispanic drivers, effects of the policy change were also found among stops for speeding, which failed the falsification test and suggested that other changes likely affected this group. These findings may support the hypothesis of differential enforcement of seat belt policy in South Carolina for Black and White drivers.

Self-reported factors that influence rear seat belt use among adults.

INTRODUCTION: While seat belt use among front seat occupants has significantly increased overtime a substantial usage gap still exists between front and back seat occupants. This study aims to identify factors that predict rear seat belt use among adult back seat passengers. METHODS: We examined data from the 2016 Motor Vehicle Occupant Safety Survey, conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, to determine the influence of front seat belt use, support of and belief of rear seat belt use laws, peer perception of seat belt use, nighttime belt use, and demographic factors on self-reported rear seat belt use. Rao-Scott chi-squared tests were used to determine significant associations between self-reported rear belt use and each predictor. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios and determine the influence of significant predictors on rear seat belt use. Sampling weights were applied to produce nationally representative estimates; all statistical significance tests accounted for the complex survey design. RESULTS: Among adults who reported riding in the back seat, 63% reported always using a rear seat belt. Front seat belt use, support and belief of state seat belt laws, nighttime seat belt use, age, and education were significantly associated with rear seat belt use. Multivariate regression results showed that adults who supported rear seat belt laws, reported front seat belt use and believed their state has a rear seat belt law were significantly more likely to report full-time use in the back seat. CONCLUSIONS: Seat belt laws and front seat belt use had the strongest association with reporting full-time use in the back seat. Practical Applications: Increasing familiarity with existing laws directed towards rear seat belt use as well as increasing awareness about the benefits of seat belts in all seating positions may help improve rear seat belt use.

Motor vehicle injury prevention in eight American Indian/Alaska Native communities: results from the 2010-2014 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Tribal Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention Program.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to increase seat belt (SB) use and reduce motor vehicle (MV) injuries and death; eight tribal communities implemented evidence-based strategies from the Guide to Community Preventive Services during 2010-2014. STUDY DESIGN: SB use was measured through direct observational surveys and traffic safety activity data. Traffic safety activities included enhanced enforcement campaign events, ongoing enforcement of SB laws, and media. The number of MV injuries (including fatal and non-fatal) was measured through MV crash data collected by police. RESULTS: Percentage change increases in SB use were observed in all eight projects; average annual increases of three projects were statistically significant (ranging from 10% to 43%). Four of the eight projects exceeded their goals for percentage change increases in SB use. Approximately 200 media events and 100 enforcement events focused on SB use were conducted across the eight projects. Five projects had an annual average of ≥100 SB use citations during the project period. MV injuries (fatal and non-fatal combined) significantly decreased in three projects (ranging from a 10% to 21% average annual decrease). CONCLUSIONS: Increases in SB use and decreases in the number of MV injuries can be achieved by tailoring evidence-based strategies to tribal communities.

The role of perceived risk, reasons for non-seat belt use and demographic characteristics for seat belt use on urban and rural roads.

Despite the well-documented benefits of seat belt use, a large number of drivers fail to fasten their seat belts in Iran. Efforts to improve seat belt use can be enhanced by identifying factors that motivate seat belt use. The main aims of this study were to assess the relationship between perceived risk of being ticketed and seat belt use among adult drivers on urban and rural roads and to identify reasons for not wearing a seat belt while exploring the relationship between these reasons and demographic information of adult drivers. An additional aim was to explain seat belt use on these two types of roads based on the perceived risk of being ticketed, demographic characteristics of drivers and the reasons for not wearing a seat belt. A total of 546 questionnaires were distributed including demographic information, items measuring the perceived risk of being ticketed and inquiry about the reasons for refusing to wear a seat belt. The results from valid questionnaires (n = 397) revealed that the perceived risk of being ticketed was not a predictor of seat belt use on urban and rural roads while controlling for age, gender, the influence of being ticketed and discomfort were predictors of seat belt use on urban roads. Meanwhile, older drivers, being ticketed in the past 3 years, having vehicle crashes in the past 3 years and discomfort were sole predictors of seat belt use on rural roads. Also, the findings suggested that there were differences between groups of respondents based on their demographic characteristics in the perceived risk of being ticketed and reported reasons for not wearing seat belts. The findings of this article extended the outcomes of previous studies in factors affecting seat belt use separately for drivers on urban and rural roads, which can help policy-makers promote seat belt use rates.

Would Stronger Seat Belt Laws Reduce Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths?: A Semi-Bayesian Analysis.

BACKGROUND: For policy questions where substantial empirical background information exists, conventional frequentist policy analysis is hard to justify. Bayesian analysis quantitatively incorporates prior knowledge, but is not often used in applied policy analysis. METHODS: We combined 2000-2016 data from the Fatal Analysis Reporting System with priors based on past empirical studies and policy documents to study the impact of mandatory seat belt laws on traffic fatalities. We used a Bayesian data augmentation approach to combine information from prior studies with difference-in-differences analyses of recent law changes to provide updated evidence on the impact that upgrading to primary enforcement of seat belt laws has on fatalities. RESULTS: After incorporating the evidence from past studies, we find limited evidence to support the hypothesis that recent policy upgrades affect fatality rates. We estimate that upgrading to primary enforcement reduced fatality rates by 0.37 deaths per billion vehicle miles traveled (95% posterior interval -0.90, 0.16), or a rate ratio of 0.96 (95% posterior interval 0.91, 1.02), and increased the proportion of decedents reported as wearing seat belts by 7 percentage points (95% posterior interval 5, 8), or a risk ratio of 1.18 (95% posterior interval 1.13, 1.24). CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian methods can provide credible estimates of future policy impacts, especially for policy questions that occur in dynamic environments, such as traffic safety.

Belief about seat belt use and seat belt wearing behavior among front and rear seat passengers in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Unrestrained drivers and passengers represent almost half of all passenger vehicle occupant deaths in the United States. The current study assessed the relationship between the belief about importance of seat belt use and the behavior of always wearing a seat belt. METHOD: Data from 2012 ConsumerStyles were analyzed separately for front and rear passenger seating positions. Multivariable regression models were constructed to identify the association between seat belt belief and behavior (i.e., always wears seat belt) among adults. Models controlled for type of state seat belt law (primary, secondary, or none). RESULTS: Seat belt use was higher in front passenger seats (86.1%) than in rear passenger seats (61.6%). Similarly, belief that seat belt use was very important was higher in reference to the front passenger seat (84.2%) versus the rear passenger seat (70.5%). For the front passenger seat, belief was significantly associated with seat belt use in states with both primary enforcement laws (adjPR 1.64) and secondary enforcement laws (adjPR 2.77). For the rear passenger seat, belief was also significantly associated with seat belt use, and two 2-way interactions were observed (belief by sex, belief by region). CONCLUSIONS: Despite overall high rates of seat belt use in the United States, certain groups are less likely to buckle up than others. The study findings suggest that efforts to increase seat belt use among high-risk populations, such as those who live in states with secondary or no seat belt laws and those who ride in rear seats (which include people who utilize taxis or ride-hailing vehicles) could benefit from interventions designed to strengthen beliefs related to the benefits of seat belt use. Practical applications: Future research that uses a theoretical framework to better understand the relationship between beliefs and behavior may inform interventions to improve seat belt use.

Neighborhood-level factors affecting seat belt use.

Despite the well-known safety benefits of seat belt use, some vehicle occupants still do not use them. This is a challenge in Tennessee, which has a lower seat belt use rate compared to the United States national average. Roadside observations and interviews are the two main sources for estimating seat belt use rate and have several limitations (e.g., small sample size, social desirability bias). To address these limitations, we attributed seat belt use of individuals who were involved in traffic crashes (N = 542,776) to their corresponding home-addresses. Home-addresses were retrieved from police crash reports and were geocoded, and assigned to their corresponding census tract revealing added information about the spatial distribution of seat belt use and socioeconomics of the areas surrounding the crash victim's home. The average seat belt use rate in the metropolitan area was 88% and for the non-metropolitan area was 87%. A Tobit model was used to evaluate the relationship between the seat belt use rate for both drivers and passengers over 16 years old, with neighborhood sociodemographic variables. Population, age cohorts, race, household vehicles' ownership, household size, and education were among the predictors of the seat belt use rate. Results of this analysis could be used in safety campaign design to reach specific geographic areas and groups with a lower seat belt use rate.

States Consider Cameras and Seat Belts to Increase School Bus Safety.

(1) More than 25 million children ride in a school bus every weekday in the U.S. (2) School buses are the safest way to transport students. (3) Nearly 60 school bus passengers died in crashes, and almost 100 pedestrians under 18 were killed in crashes related to school transportation, between 2007 and 2016.

Seatbelt wearing rate in a Chinese city: Results from multi-round cross-sectional studies.

OBJECTIVE: Road traffic crashes impose a heavy burden in China's most populous city, Shanghai. Since early 2016, Shanghai police have started deploying high-resolution cameras and an object-detection algorithm in seatbelt enforcement. Around the same time, an international consortium on road safety launched a series of capacity trainings for law enforcement accompanied by infrastructure renovation and social marketing campaigns in Shanghai. Our objective is to assess the level and trend of seatbelt use in Shanghai over 2015-2017. METHODS: Ongoing observational studies evaluate seatbelt use within the city. Data are collected at eight randomly selected locations throughout the city, stratified by road type and geographic locations. Data collection covers most times of the day on both business days and weekends, providing a full representation of varying traffic models during both rush hours and non-rush hours. At each site, trained field workers observe seatbelt use of occupants in all passing motorized vehicles. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed to analyze the data. FINDINGS: From October 2015 to December 2017, six rounds of data collection were completed with a total sample size of 77,641 drivers and passengers of motor vehicles. The seatbelt use rate has steadily increased over time, from 60.8% (95% CI: 59.9%-61.7%) in round 1 to 84.9% (84.3%-85.4%) in round 6 (p-value < 0.01). The increase is substantial and statistically significant for both drivers and passengers (p-value < 0.01). Results from the multivariate logistic regression show an annual growth rate of seatbelt use of 8.8% (8.4%-9.1%); the wearing rate was 49.8% (49.0%-50.5%) lower among passengers than drivers; 3.5% (2.9%-4.1%) lower in peri-urban areas than central urban areas; 16.3% (14.3%-18.4%) higher among 18-24-year and 18.9% (17.0%-20.9%) higher among 25-59-year olds than other age groups. CONCLUSION AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Seatbelt use in Shanghai has been boosted during a short period of time through a combined strategy that includes training of police, social marketing campaign, and the deployment of computer vision assisted enforcement. Large cities in China and other countries facing similar challenges with seatbelt wearing may learn from Shanghai's experience.

Impact of child restraint policies on child occupant fatalities and injuries in Chile and its regions: An interrupted time-series study.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the effectiveness of the child restraint legislation (CRL) introduced in Chile in December 2005 and the National Decree enacted in February 2007, which regulated the technical characteristics of child restraint devices with the goal of reducing child occupant fatalities and severe injuries nationally and within Chile's regions. METHODS: An interrupted time-series design was used to measure the effect of CRL and the National Decree on two dependent variables-number of child occupant deaths in traffic collisions and number of child occupants severely injured in traffic collisions per vehicle fleet from 2002 to 2014 (police data). Our analyses compared the incidence of these outcomes in the post-intervention period (2006 to 2014) with the period prior to these interventions (2002-2005) nationally and by region, controlling for several confounders. RESULTS: Nationally, the child restraint policies were associated with a 39.3% (95% CI: 4.7; 73.9) reduction in child occupant fatalities, but no significant decrease was observed in child severe injuries. These interventions were associated with a 75.3% (95% CI: 15.6; 135.1) reduction in the rate of child occupant fatalities in the southern regions, and a 32.9% (95% CI: 1.1; 67.0) reduction in the rate of children severely injured in the northern regions. CONCLUSION: In the short term, the CRL and the National Decree were associated with fewer child occupant fatalities, at the national level and in the southern regions, and severely injured child occupants in traffic collisions in Chile's northern regions. These results demonstrate a limited temporal and territorial impact. This suggests that to effectively protect vulnerable populations across all territories, efforts should be expanded more consistently and sustained over time.

Factors involved in the assessment of paediatric traffic injuries and deaths.

Motor-vehicle collisions are the leading cause of unintentional injury and death in children in many parts of the world, including Europe, North America and Australia. The number of fatal collisions has decreased considerably in countries where safety measures such as child restraints, seat belts and air bags have been introduced, providing protection for children within vehicles, although it is recognised that there have been concomitant improvements in emergency responses and techniques, and in hospital treatments. Helmets and changes in external vehicle designs have been implemented to protect paediatric pedestrians and cyclists. However, despite the development of safety guidelines and technologies, injuries still occur. This paper provides an overview of the role of motor-vehicle collisions in paediatric morbidity and mortality to analyse the nature and aetiology of common fatal and non-fatal injuries in children that may present for forensic assessment as passengers, pedestrians or cyclists.

The effect of verified pediatric trauma centers, state laws, and crash characteristics on time trends in adolescent motor vehicle fatalities, 1999-2015.

BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle crashes are a leading cause of adolescent death from trauma. A recent study found American College of Surgeons-verified pediatric trauma centers (vPTC) were inversely correlated with pediatric mortality, but the analysis was limited to a single year. This study assesses the contribution of vPTCs, crash characteristics, and state driver laws on 15- to 17-year-old motor vehicle crash mortality for all 50 states from 1999 to 2015. METHODS: Prospective data on motor vehicle fatalities, crash characteristics, state driving laws, and American College of Surgeons-verified trauma centers were collected from publicly available sources for 50 US states from 1999 to 2015. A mixed fixed/random effects multivariate regression model was fitted to assess the relative contribution of crash characteristics, state laws, and vPTCs while controlling for state variation and time trends. RESULTS: The final regression model included driver and crash characteristics, verified trauma centers, and state laws. Camera laws ([B = -0.57 [p < 0.001]) were associated with a 57% decrease in the rate of change in adolescent crude fatalities. The lagged Level 1 vPTC crude rate (B = -0.12 [p < .001]) was protective and contributed independently to a 12% decline in the rate of change in teen fatalities over the time period. Seat belt laws (B = -0.15 [p < 0.001]), graduated driver's license passenger restrictions (B = -0.07[p < 0.001]), graduated driver's license learner permit period (B = -0.04 [p < 0.002]), nondeployed airbag (B = -0.003 [p < 0.001]), and Hispanic heritage (B = -0.003 [p < 0.05]) were protective. Increased risk of fatality was associated with minivan (B = 0.01 [p < 0.001]), speed > 90 mph (B = 0.004 [p < 0.001]), rural roads (B = 0.002 [p < 0.002], unknown seat belt compliance (B = 0.004 [p < 0.001]), and dry road surface (B = 0.005 [p < 0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: State camera laws during the study time frame are associated with a 57% decrease in the rate of change in adolescent crude fatalities; vPTCs during the study time period reduced overall rate of change in the crude fatality rate by 12%. State laws, restrictions on teenage passengers and longer learner's permit periods, and seat belt laws are associated with significant decreases in the crude teen mortality rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective study and prevention, level III.

The effectiveness of child restraint and seat belt legislation in reducing child injuries: The case of Serbia.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine the short- and long-term impacts of Serbia's 2009 update of child restraint and seat belt legislation on the incidence of pediatric motor vehicle-related injury. With this new law, the use of child restraints in children age 0-3 became mandatory, and children 4-12 had to wear seat belts in the rear seats. METHODS: A unique data set with assembled information from public institutions of the Republic of Serbia from January 2004 to December 2014 and analyses based on interrupted time series were carried out. Eight outcome variables were assessed: monthly rate of injured children for 2 age groups 0-3 and 4-12 per child population, number of registered motor vehicles, number of passengers transported, and number of passengers' kilometers traveled. Independent variables were short- and long-term impacts of Serbia's legislation update (June 2009). Data on injuries were obtained from Serbia's Road Traffic Safety Agency. Child population and other transport-related data were obtained from the Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. We excluded fatalities from the analysis. RESULTS: In the first year of the updated legislation there was a reduction of 2.0% (confidence interval [CI], 0.1; 3.9) of injured children aged 0-3 and a reduction of 2.5% (CI, 0.6; 4.3) of injured children aged 4-12. Six years after enactment of the legislation, a significant reduction of 8.2% (CI, 3.5; 13.0) of injured children aged 4-12 was observed, but a nonsignificant reduction of 1.1% (CI, -5.8; 3.5) was found for injured children aged 0-3. By December 2014, 369 (CI, 186; 555) injuries among children aged 4-12 were avoided. CONCLUSIONS: The case of Serbia suggests that the new law was effective in reducing injuries among children aged 0-3 in the short term and injuries among children aged 4-12 in both the short term and long term. To understand these results, we suggest 2 hypotheses. First, low proper usage of child restraint and weak police enforcement were likely to explain the short-term effect among children aged 0-3. Second, access to seat belts in rear seats was probably a condition that facilitated the use of these devices among children aged 4-12, protecting them during the period of the study.

Burden of road traffic injuries related to delays in implementing safety belt laws in low- and lower-middle-income countries.

OBJECTIVE: Delayed implementation of effective road safety policies must be considered when quantifying the avoidable part of the fatal and nonfatal injuries burden. We sought to assess the avoidable part of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost due to road traffic injuries related to delays in implementing road safety laws in low- and lower-middle-income countries. METHODS: We chose one country for each of the regions of the World Health Organization (WHO) and World Bank (WB) country income levels. We used freely available data sets (WHO, International Traffic Safety Data and Analysis Group, the WB). Delays in implementation were calculated until 2013, from the year mandatory use of safety belts by motor vehicle front seat occupants was first introduced worldwide. We used life expectancy tables and age groups as social values in the DALY calculation model. From the estimated total burden, avoidable DALYs were calculated using estimates of the effectiveness of seat belt laws on fatal and nonfatal injuries combined, as extracted from published international reviews of evidence. RESULTS: From the reference year 1972, implementation delays varied from 27 years (Uzbekistan) to 41 years in Bolivia (no seat belt law as of 2013). During delays, total absolute numbers of DALYs lost due to road traffic injuries reached 8,462,099 in Nigeria, 7,203,570 in Morocco, 4,695,500 in Uzbekistan, 3,866,391 in Cambodia, 3,253,359 in Bolivia, and 3,128,721 in Sri Lanka. Using effectiveness estimates ranging from 3 to 20% reduction, the avoidable burden of road traffic injuries for car occupants was highest in Uzbekistan (avoidable part from 1.2 to 10.4%) and in Morocco (avoidable part from 1.5 to 12.3%). In countries where users of public transport and pedestrians were the most affected by the burden, the avoidable parts ranged from 0.5 to 4.4% (Nigeria) and from 0.5 to 3.4% (Bolivia). Burden of road traffic injuries mostly affected motorcyclists in Sri Lanka and Cambodia where the avoidable parts were less than 2% in both countries. In all selected countries, burden of traffic injuries mostly affected men (about 80%) as well as young people (15-34 years). CONCLUSIONS: Despite limited data availability in low- and middle-income countries, the avoidable part of the burden related to delayed intervention is measurable. These results can be used to convince countries to avoid delaying the provision of better protection to road users.

Seat belt and child restraint use in a developing country metropolitan city.

Seat belt and child restraint use is noted to be poor in developing countries such as Ghana. An unobstructive observational survey guided by the Theory of Planned Behaviour was therefore conducted to assess seat belt and child restraint use in the Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana. The observational survey was carried out at the entrances of four nursery schools in medium and high class residential areas in the Metropolis to determine seat belt use by drivers and accompanied child being transported/dropped off in school. The results revealed that a total of 1922 vehicles comprising 826(43.0%) cars, 350(18.2%) SUV, 644(33.5%) taxis and 102(5.3%) mini buses with 3844 vehicle occupants comprising 1922 drivers and child apiece were successively observed. The majority of the drivers (53.1%) did not use the seat belt with 13.2% of the children been restrained. The gender of the driver has a relationship with the seat belt use. The vehicle type has a relationship with the child restraint use and the gender of the driver has a significant relationship with child restraint use. The enforcement of the Road Traffic Act 2004 and Road Traffic Regulation 2180 by the officials of Motor Transport and Traffic Department(MTTD) of the Ghana Police Service in collaboration with National Road Safety Commission (NRSC) can establish social norms that may have a greater potential to enhance seat belt and child restraint use in the Metropolis.

Effectiveness of child restraints and booster legislation in Israel.

INTRODUCTION: 96 countries in the world have enacted child restraints and booster legislation (CRBL). Yet, findings regarding the effectiveness of CRBLs are mixed. The current study is the first to examine the association between Israel's CRBL, implemented in November 2004, and the traffic injury and fatality rates among children aged 0-9 years. We extend on previous studies by accounting for risk exposure and by comparing populations of children affected by the legislation to those who were not. METHODS: We used an interrupted time series design of kilometre driven-based traffic injury rates for children aged 0-4 years and children aged 5-9 years using childred aged 10-14 years as a comparison group. We estimated the effects of Israel's CRBL using monthly injury and fatality count data from the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics. The sample includes all child vehicle occupants injured and killed in crashes in Israel between January 2003 and December 2011. RESULTS: Children aged 0-4 years experienced a 5.17% yearly reduction in traffic injury rate (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.94(95% CI 0.92 to 0.96); p=0.000), and the injury rate for children aged 5-9 years was associated with a 4.10% yearly reduction (IRR: 0.95(95% CI 0.93 to 0.98); p=0.001). The comprehensive CRBL implemented in Israel was associated with a 6.3% (95% CI -7.2% to5.5%; p=0.001) reduction in traffic injuries and fatalities for children aged 0-9 years. CONCLUSION: This is the first study comparing traffic injury rates per kilometre driven for motor vehicle-occupant children before and after the implementation of the CRBL in Israel.